Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited to biological therapeutics

The administration of biological therapeutics can evoke some level of immune response to the drug product in the receiving subjects. An immune response comprised of neutralizing antibodies can lead to loss of efficacy or potentially more serious clinical sequelae. Therefore, it is important to monitor the immunogenicity of biological therapeutics throughout the drug product development cycle. Immunoassays are typically used to screen for the presence and development of anti-drug product antibodies. However, in-vitro cell-based assays prove extremely useful for the characterization of immunoassay-positive samples to determine if the detected antibodies have neutralizing properties. This document provides scientific recommendations based on the experience of the authors for the development of cell-based assays for the detection of neutralizing antibodies in non-clinical and clinical studies.     

Preclinical immunogenicity testing for recombinant therapeutic proteins

The assessment of the immunogenicity of recombinant therapeutic proteins (RTPs) has received more attention in the past 4 years than in the previous 20 years. The induction of clinically adverse events in RTP-treated patients and the subsequent measurement of antibodies to those RTPs has challenged the scientific community to re evaluate the methods and techniques used for determining the immunogenic potential of therapeutic proteins. One preclinical strategy for determining the relative immunogenicity of RTPs is the use of a comparative hyperimmunization technique in animals that optimizes an immunological response. This approach has utility for analyzing the immunogenic potential of different formulations as well as for potential adverse effects. The hyperimmunization model may also provide a source of antisera specific to the RTP that can be used during selection of the appropriate assay technique(s) and conditions for measuring the immune response. Solid- or liquid-phase, affinities and the frequency of washes, isotypes, and sensitivities are key parameters that have become the focus of assay development techniques. The techniques that will be discussed include enzyme-linked immunoassays, surface plasmon resonance (Biacore), and capillary electrophoresis.     

Immunogenicity issues in drug development

Immunogenicity is an important factor that manufacturers must consider as they develop new protein therapeutics. It is important to understand the immunogenicity of new proteins both at the preclinical phase and in the clinical phase of development. This paper provides an overview of the issues that manufacturers should consider including some of the potential reasons that some proteins induce an immune response, a discussion regarding current methodology used to understand immunogenicity, and some examples of marketed protein therapeutics with immunogenicity issues. Given the increasing scrutiny from regulatory agencies around the way immunogenicity is assessed by manufacturers, the strategy of detecting and characterizing antibodies that are formed against protein therapeutics is becoming an important topic. Screening assays are typically performed first on all serum samples collected in the course of a trial to detect the presence of antibodies that can bind to the protein therapeutic. There are several platforms in use: radioimmune precipitation assays (RIP), enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), electrochemiluminescent assays (ECL), and biosensor-based assays. Each has its advantages and disadvantages, and needs to be evaluated to identify the optimal platform for a specific therapeutic protein. Once antibodies are identified, a confirmatory assay is performed to verify and characterize the antibodies. A biological assay should be used next to test if these antibodies are capable of neutralizing the biological effect of the drug. Any sample that is positive for neutralizing antibodies, indicates that the antibody is probably having an impact on the patient's ability to derive full benefit from the therapeutic protein, and may be critical for patient safety.     

Immunogenicity of biotherapeutics-an overview

With the recent increase in the approval and use of biotherapeutics in clinical practice, management of the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) has become a key issue for effective long-term use of these drugs. In most instances, the clinical benefit derived from the use of the therapeutics outweighs the risk of developing ADA. In rare instances, however, safety issues accompany development of ADA. Although it is unclear why certain individuals generate an immune response while others tolerate the drug, growing experience from the clinic has facilitated a better appreciation of many patient-, disease- and product-related factors that contribute to immunogenicity. Furthermore, improvements in protein production, purification and delivery methods along with use of humanized or fully human recombinant proteins have helped to reduce the rates of immunogenicity considerably. This document provides an overview of the scientific reasons for developing an immunogenic response, factors that contribute to the immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, clinical impact of immunogenicity and general strategies used to manage this risk.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a Gag-Pol candidate HIV-1 DNA vaccine administered by a needle-free device in HIV-1-seronegative subjects

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a candidate HIV DNA vaccine administered using a needle-free device. DESIGN: In this phase 1, dose escalation, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 21 healthy adults were randomized to receive placebo or 0.5, 1.5, or 4 mg of a single plasmid expressing a Gag/Pol fusion protein. Each participant received repeat immunizations at days 28 and 56 after the first inoculation. Safety and immunogenicity data were collected. RESULTS: The vaccine was well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild injection site reactions, including pain, tenderness, and erythema. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. HIV-specific antibody response was not detected in any vaccinee by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. HIV-specific T-cell responses to Gag or Pol as measured by enzyme-linked immunospot assay and intracellular cytokine staining were of low frequency and magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: This candidate HIV DNA vaccine was safe and well tolerated. No HIV-specific antibody responses were detected, and only low-magnitude HIV-specific T-cell responses were detected in 8 (53%) of 15 vaccinees. This initial product led to the development of a 4-plasmid multiclade HIV DNA Vaccine Research Center vaccine candidate in which envelope genes expressing Env from clades A, B, and C and a Nef gene from clade B have been added.     

Immunogenicity against human papillomavirus type 16 virus-like particles is strongly enhanced by the PhoPc phenotype in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Recombinant Salmonella strains have been widely used to deliver heterologous antigens and induce immune responses in vaccinated animals and humans. It remains to be established, however, how these bacteria mount an immune response; this has prevented the rational design of vaccines. Here we report for the first time that a particular genetic program, PhoPc, is necessary for recombinant Salmonella strains to induce an antibody response to a heterologous antigen, the human papillomaviruses type 16 (HPV16) virus-like particle (VLP). The PhoPc phenotype results from a point mutation in phoQ, the gene encoding the sensor component of a two-component regulatory system (PhoP-PhoQ) that controls the expression of a number of virulence factors in Salmonellae. To demonstrate that immunogenicity of the viral antigen expressed by the bacterial vector was dependent on the PhoPc phenotype, we have expressed the phoQ mutant gene (phoQ24) in two differently attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains. Our data show extrachromosomal phoQ24 to be dominant over the chromosomal copy of the phoQ gene, conferring the PhoPc phenotype on the recipient strains. In addition, activation of PhoPQ-regulated genes by the plasmid-encoded PhoQ24 did not alter bacterial survival and conferred immunogenicity to the HPV16 VLP expressed in the two S. enterica serovar Typhimurium backgrounds, inducing the production of HPV-specific antibodies in mice. This strongly suggests that at least one of the PhoP-regulated genes is necessary for mounting an efficient antibody response to HPV16 VLP. This finding sets the stage for further development of a Salmonella-based vaccine against HPV infection and cervical cancer.     

Recommendations on risk-based strategies for detection and characterization of antibodies against biotechnology products

The appropriate evaluation of the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals is of major importance for their successful development and licensure. Antibodies elicited by these products in many cases cause no detectable clinical effects in humans. However, antibodies to some therapeutic proteins have been shown to cause a variety of clinical consequences ranging from relatively mild to serious adverse events. In addition, antibodies can affect drug efficacy. In non-clinical studies, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) can complicate interpretation of the toxicity, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Therefore, it is important to develop testing strategies that provide valid assessments of antibody responses in both non-clinical and clinical studies. This document provides recommendations for antibody testing strategies stemming from the experience of contributing authors. The recommendations are intended to foster a more unified approach to antibody testing across the biopharmaceutical industry. The strategies proposed are also expected to contribute to better understanding of antibody responses and to further advance immunogenicity evaluation.     

高活力人降钙素类似物vhCT的免疫原性研究

本研究用固相多肽合成法合成人降钙素类似物vhCT ,产物纯度达到等电聚焦均一 ,质谱测定分子量精确。生物活性为天然人降钙素的 2 0～ 2 5倍。用放射免疫法测定vhCT能与识别天然人降钙素的抗体起反应 ,产生IgG抗体的免疫原性随偶联的不同载体而有差异。但在BALB/C5 7小鼠体内不引起IgE增高。提示vhCT不产生IgE介导的过敏反应 ,具有药物应用前景。     

Pharmacology and safety assessment of humanized monoclonal antibodies for therapeutic use.

The humanization of monoclonal antibodies has generated a class of therapeutic products with improved safety, longer half-lives, and greatly diminished immunogenicity. These engineered proteins are highly species specific and in many cases only cross-react in humans. Where there is cross-reactivity in nonhuman primates or other species, it is not always clear that the pharmacologic effects reflect the potential actions in human volunteers or patients. As with other biologic products, the profile of humanized monoclonal antibodies dictates the preclinical strategy. The preclinical programs for the 2 humanized monoclonal antibodies described here, anti-HLA-DR (Hu1D10) and anti-CD3 (HuM291), demonstrate several unique aspects that affected their preclinical development strategy. Hu1D10 binds to a posttranslational form of HLA-DR and recognizes this antigen in some but not all human and nonhuman primates. The second antibody, HuM291, cross-reacts with CD3 only in the chimpanzee, which is not an optimal test species. In addition, a marketed anti-CD3 product exists (OKT3), and in the preclinical development of our antibody during testing of efficacy and safety, we needed to focus on adverse effects that might be similar to those of OKT3. In these studies, the safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacology (B- and T-cell depletion and recovery) of the 2 antibodies were evaluated. The focus in this review is on the safety and pharmacology testing and the current status of each drug.     

Development and characterization of a human antibody reference panel against erythropoietin suitable for the standardization of ESA immunogenicity testing

Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) has been used therapeutically for more than two decades in the treatment of anemia. Although EPO is generally well tolerated, in rare cases, patients have developed anti-EPO antibodies that can negatively impact safety and efficacy. Therefore, the detection of antibodies against EPO is a regulatory requirement during clinical development and post-approval. Although it is a rare phenomenon, antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) is a serious complication than can result from antibodies that develop and neutralize EPO as well as endogenous erythropoietin. Currently, there are no universally accepted analytical methods to detect the full repertoire of binding and neutralizing anti-EPO antibodies. A number of different methods that differ in terms of antibodies detected and assay sensitivities are used by different manufacturers. There is also a lack of antibody reference reagents, and therefore no consistent basis for detecting and measuring anti-EPO antibodies. Reference reagents, with established ranges, are essential to monitor the safety and efficacy of all erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) structurally related to human erythropoietin. This is the first report of the development and characterization of a panel of fully human antibodies against EPO suitable as reference reagents. The characteristics of antibodies within the panel were selected based on the prevalence of non-neutralizing IgG and IgM antibodies in non-PRCA patients and neutralizing IgG antibodies, including IgG1 and IgG4, in antibody-mediated PRCA subjects. The reference panel includes antibodies of high- and low-affinity with binding specificity to neutralizing and non-neutralizing erythropoietin epitopes. The subclass of human antibodies in this reference panel includes an IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4, as well as an IgM isotype. This antibody panel could help select appropriate immunogenicity assays, guide validation, and monitor assay performance. Further, this human anti-ESA antibody panel may help set the limits of each assay platform in terms of the full repertoire of the anti-ESA antibodies, and may facilitate standardization of ESA immunogenicity reporting across assay platforms.     

Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop

The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, hereafter the Comet assay, can be used to investigate the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The major advantages of this assay include the relative ease of application to any tissue of interest, the detection of multiple classes of DNA damage and the generation of data at the level of the single cell. These features give the Comet assay potential advantages over other in vivo test methods, which are limited largely to proliferating cells and/or a single tissue. The Comet assay has demonstrated its reliability in many testing circumstances and is, in general, considered to be acceptable for regulatory purposes. However, despite the considerable data published on the in vivo Comet assay and the general agreement within the international scientific community over many protocol-related issues, it was felt that a document giving detailed practical guidance on the protocol required for regulatory acceptance of the assay was required. In a recent meeting held in conjunction with the 4th International Comet Assay Workshop (Ulm, Germany, 22-25 July 2001) an expert panel reviewed existing data and recent developments of the Comet assay with a view to developing such a document. This paper is intended to act as an update to the more general guidelines which were published as a result of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures. The recommendations are also seen as a major step towards gaining more formal regulatory acceptance of the Comet assay.     

From the bench to clinical practice: understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals

Unlike conventional chemical drugs where immunogenicity typically does not occur, the development of anti‐drug antibodies following treatment with biologics has led to concerns about their impact on clinical safety and efficacy. Hence the elucidation of the immunogenicity of biologics is required for drug approval by health regulatory authorities worldwide. Published ADA ‘incidence’ rates can vary greatly between same‐class products and different patient populations. Such differences are due to disparate bioanalytical methods and interpretation approaches, as well as a plethora of product‐specific and patient‐specific factors that are not fully understood. Therefore, the incidence of ADA and their association with clinical consequences cannot be generalized across products. In this context, the intent of this review article is to discuss the complex nature of ADA and key nuances of the methodologies used for immunogenicity assessments, and to dispel some fallacies and myths.     

Targeting antigens to an invariant epitope of the MHC Class II DR molecule potentiates the immune response to subunit vaccines

Recombinant subunit and peptidic vaccines in general present a reduced immunogenicity in vaccinated individuals with respect to the whole pathogen from which they derived. The generation of strong immune responses to these vaccines requires the use of potent adjuvants, high antigen doses and repetitive vaccinations. In this report, we document the enhanced antibody response obtained against two recombinant subunit vaccines by means of targeting to antigen-presenting cells by a recombinant single chain antibody. This antibody, named APCH1, recognizes an epitope of MHC Class II DR molecule preserved in different animal species, including humans. We showed that vaccinal antigens translationally fused to APCH1 antibody and produced by recombinant baculoviruses in insect larvae (Trichoplusia ni), elicited an increased antibody response in comparison with the same antigens alone or fused to a carrier molecule. These results suggest that targeting of antigens to this invariant MHC Class II epitope has immunopotentiating effects that could circumvent the reduced potency of peptidic or subunit vaccines, opening the possibility of widespread application of APCH1 as a new adjuvant antibody of general use.     

Assessing the Immunogenicity of Biopharmaceuticals

Biopharmaceuticals have the potential to raise an immunogenic response in treated individuals, which may impact the efficacy and safety profile of these drugs. As a result, it is essential to evaluate immunogenicity throughout the different phases of the clinical development of a biopharmaceutical, including post-marketing surveillance. Although rigorous evaluation of biopharmaceutical immunogenicity is required by regulatory authorities, there is a lack of uniform standards for the type, quantity, and quality of evidence, and for guidance on experimental design for immunogenicity assays or criteria to compare immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Moreover, substantial technological advances in methods to assess immune responses have yielded higher immunogenicity rates with modern assays, and limit comparison of immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals outside of head-to-head clinical trials. Accordingly, research programs, regulatory agencies, and clinicians need to keep pace with continuously evolving analyses of immunogenicity. Here, we review factors associated with immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals, potential clinical ramifications, and current regulatory guidance for evaluating immunogenicity, and discuss methods to assess immunogenicity in non-clinical and clinical studies. We also describe special considerations for evaluating the immunogenicity of biosimilar candidates.     

Understanding and Applying Regulatory Guidance on the Nonclinical Development of Biotechnology-Derived Pharmaceuticals

Biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals are a well established and growing part of the therapeutic armamentarium. Beginning with recombinant versions of products such as insulin that were previously manufactured by extraction from animal and human sources, licensed biotechnology drugs and those in development now span an ever-increasing range of product types and therapeutic categories. As a consequence of this diversity, both general and product class-specific scientific guidelines have been developed on a regional (e.g. EU/US) or international (e.g. ICH - International Conference on Harmonization) basis. The current portfolio of nonclinical guidelines, particularly ICH S6, emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to the specific circumstances of the individual biotechnology product and its intended indication, taking into account factors not generally applicable to small-molecule drugs, such as pharmacodynamic responsiveness of safety and efficacy models, species specificity, and antibody formation. Guidelines developed principally with small-molecule drugs in mind may, nevertheless, have some applicability to biotechnology drugs on issues such as safety pharmacology, as well as on regulatory, procedural and dossier submission requirements. Scientific guidelines, such as those providing nonclinical guidance, are just one, albeit important, component of an increasingly complex legal/scientific environment in drug development.     

Strategies for detection,measurement and characterization of unwanted antibodies induced by therapeutic biologicals

An important aspect of evaluating the safety of therapeutic biologicals is the assessment of the unwanted immunogenicity of such biologicals in recipients. Properly planned immunogenicity studies with appropriately devised strategies are critical if valid conclusions concerning the unwanted immunogenicity are to be derived. Such studies need to be conducted using carefully selected and validated procedures. Several techniques are available for detection and measurement of immunogenicity including immunoassays, radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPAs), surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and bioassays. A combination of methods for characterization of the induced antibodies is usually necessary for a detailed understanding of the type(s) of antibodies generated against a therapeutic product. This review considers the benefits and limitations of the various techniques available for antibody detection and outlines a strategy for the assessment of unwanted immunogenicity of therapeutic products.     

Expression and serologic activity of a soluble recombinant Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein.

Plasmodium vivax Duffy binding protein (DBP) is a conserved functionally important protein. P. vivax DBP is an asexual blood-stage malaria vaccine candidate because adhesion of P. vivax DBP to its erythrocyte receptor is essential for the parasite to continue development in human blood. We developed a soluble recombinant protein of P. vivax DBP (rDBP) and examined serologic activity to it in residents of a region of high endemicity. This soluble rDBP product contained the cysteine-rich ligand domain and most of the contiguous proline-rich hydrophilic region. rDBP was expressed as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein and was isolated from GST by thrombin treatment of the purified fusion protein bound on glutathione agarose beads. P. vivax rDBP was immunogenic in rabbits and induced antibodies that reacted with P. vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi merozoites. Human sera from adult residents of a region of Papua New Guinea where malaria is highly endemic or P. vivax-infected North American residents reacted with rDBP in an immunoblot and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The reactivity to reduced, denatured P. vivax rDBP and the cross-reactivity with P. knowlesi indicated the presence of immunogenic conserved linear B-cell epitopes. A more extensive serologic survey of Papua New Guinea residents showed that antibody response to P. vivax DBP is common and increases with age, suggesting a possible boosting of the antibody response in some by repeated exposure to P. vivax. A positive humoral response to P. vivax DBP correlated with a significantly higher response to P. vivax MSP-1(19). The natural immunogenicity of this DBP should strengthen its usefulness as a vaccine.     

Quantitation of helper factor activity. I. Utilization of the ELISA method to measure helper activity in the secondary antibody response

We describe here a simple culture system for measuring the effects of regulatory cells or factors on the secondary antibody response which uses the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect antibody production. This technique offers several advantages over methods which measure hemolytic plaque-forming cells. Helper factors purified from the supernatant of in vitro primed helper cells were shown to specifically enhance antibody production from primed spleen cells by from 2- to 4-fold in this system.