Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine and buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief]

The efficacy for postoperative analgesia and side-effect of combined epidural infusion of bupivacaine and buprenorphine in comparison with each of these drugs alone were evaluated in 150 patients. All patients received initially bupivacaine 8 ml and buprenorphine 0.1 mg. In a random order, epidural infusion of 5 micrograms.ml-1 buprenorphine 1 ml.h-1 (group A; n = 50), 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml.h-1 (group B; n = 50), or a combination of the two drugs 1 ml.h-1 (group C; n = 50) was continued for 48 h by a portable disposable device. The analgesic efficacy in group C was superior to that in group A or group B. No significant difference in the incidence of side-effect was found among the three groups. We conclude that epidural analgesia with the combination of buprenorphine and bupivacaine is safe, and easy to manage, giving pain relief superior to that provided by each of these drugs alone.     

Epidural buprenorphine--a double-blind study of postoperative analgesia and side effects

Epidural buprenorphine was investigated as a postoperative analgesic in a randomized double-blind study of 158 patients given epidural analgesia with mepivacaine or bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery of the lower extremity. At the end of surgery, patients were given either 0.15 mg of epidural buprenorphine (n = 38), 0.3 mg (n = 37) in 15-ml saline, or no further epidural injections (n = 47, control group) after 2% mepivacaine for intraoperative anesthesia. A fourth group (n = 36) received 0.3 mg of buprenorphine in 15-ml saline, after the intraoperative use of 0.5% bupivacaine. The patients rated postoperative pain. The need for additional analgesics as well as side effects were recorded. Analgesia after 0.15 mg buprenorphine was superior to that after no reinjection for 6 hr after surgery (P less than 0.05). Buprenorphine (0.3 mg) was superior both to no reinjection and to 0.15 mg of buprenorphine until the twelfth hour (P less than 0.05). Analgesia after bupivacaine followed by 0.3 mg of buprenorphine was not significantly different than analgesia seen after mepivacaine followed by 0.3 mg of buprenorphine. There was an increase of PaCO2 of 2-5 mm Hg between 1.5-3.5 hr after 0.3 mg of buprenorphine without any evidence for late respiratory depression. Other side effects, e.g., disturbances of micturition, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and headache, were comparably common in all groups. The epidural administration of 0.3 mg buprenorphine may be recommended for postoperative analgesia following orthopedic surgery of the lower extremity.     

Spinal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section

Two doses of intrathecal buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia have been compared. Forty-five women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into three groups. Group A (controls, n = 15) received hyperbaric bupivacaine; Groups B and C received the same but with the addition of 0.03 mg or 0.045 mg buprenorphine, respectively. Patients receiving buprenorphine had a longer pain-free interval than the controls (P less than 0.01). Within the buprenorphine groups, patients receiving the higher dose had a longer effect (420 min s.d. 24) than those receiving the lower dose (173 min s.d. 31) (P less than 0.01) without any increase in side-effects.     

Improvement in postoperative pain relief by the addition of midazolam to an intrathecal injection of buprenorphine and bupivacaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Intrathecal injections of the benzodiazepine midazolam have been reported to cause antinociception in animals and pain relief in human beings, including the potentiation of opioid analgesia. This study compared the efficacy of the addition of midazolam to a mixture of buprenorphine and bupivacaine used for spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: The study was prospective, randomized, and observer blinded. It involved 60 patients (30 per group), ASA I and II, age 20-40 yr, undergoing minor and intermediate lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomized into two groups: the control group received a spinal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine (15 mg) plus buprenorphine (0.15 mg) and the experimental group received a spinal injection of the same two drugs and doses but supplemented with intrathecal midazolam (2 mg). RESULTS: The duration of postoperative analgesia in the control group was 9.24 +/- 2.57 h (mean +/- SEM), and 21.33 +/- 12.69 h in the midazolam treated group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with intrathecal midazolam had better pain relief judged by visual analogue score on coughing (P = 0.0013) and a nursing mobility score (P < 0.0001). Adverse effects were minor and their incidence was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that intrathecal midazolam 2 mg improves the quality and duration of postoperative pain relief afforded by intrathecal buprenorphine and bupivacaine.     

Addition of 0.1% bupivacaine to buprenorphine and droperidol in patient-controlled epidural analgesia improved postoperative pain scores on coughing after gynecological surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic efficacy of additional 0.1% bupivacaine to patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using buprenorphine and droperidol after gynecological surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Operating theater and general ward at Jichi Medical School Hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II scheduled for gynecological surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received combined general and epidural anesthesia for surgery and epidural analgesia for postoperative analgesia. Patients were assigned to receive PCEA with or without 0.1% bupivacaine. Group 1 (n = 15) received buprenorphine 20 microg and droperidol 0.1 mg diluted with saline, and group 2 (n = 15) received bupivacaine 2 mg, buprenorphine 20 microg, and droperidol 0.1 mg diluted with saline (0.1% bupivacaine solution) in a bolus dose of the PCEA, respectively. No background epidural infusion was used. MEASUREMENTS: Visual analog pain scale (VAPS) scores at rest and on coughing, and cumulative frequency of self-administrated analgesic solution in PCEA were recorded at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: There were no significant differences noted between the groups in VAPS scores at rest or in cumulative volumes of PCEA solution in 24 or 48 hours postoperatively. Median VAPS scores on coughing in group 2 were significantly lower than those values in group 1 at 24 hours (36 vs 65 mm, P < .001) and 48 hours (32 vs 54 mm, P = .036) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of 0.1% bupivacaine to PCEA using buprenorphine and droperidol provides better analgesia on coughing after gynecological surgery.     

Postoperative analgesia in children who have genito-urinary surgery A comparison between caudal buprenorphine and bupivacaine

A study conducted on 40 children, aged 1-11 years, who had genito-urinary surgery compared the quality and duration of analgesia after caudal blocks in two groups of patients. Group 1 (n = 20) received caudal bupivacaine 0.25% and group 2 (n = 20) caudal buprenorphine 4 micrograms/kg; each received 0.5 ml/kg body weight. Patients were operated on under general anaesthesia. Postoperative behaviour and severity of pain were measured on a 3-point scale. The results indicate that caudal buprenorphine provides excellent postoperative analgesia in children comparable to caudal bupivacaine in the early postoperative period. Buprenorphine proved better in the late postoperative period. Analgesia lasted from 20 hours to more than 24 hours after caudal buprenorphine with fewer side effects.     

Intra-articular buprenorphine after knee arthroscopy

Background: Demonstration of peripheral opioid receptors in inflamed synovia supports the concept of peripheral opioid analgesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of intra-articular administration of buprenorphine after knee arthroscopy.
Methods: In a double-blind randomised trial, 48 patients were assigned to four groups: group A patients received buprenorphine 100 μg i.a. and NaCl 0.9% i.m., group B patients received bupivacaine 0.25% 50 mg i.a. and NaCl 0.9% i.m., group C patients received NaCl 0.9% i.a. and buprenorphine 100 μg i.m., and group D patients received NaCl 0.9% i.a. and NaCl 0.9% i.m. Intensity of postoperative pain was evaluated by VAS at recovery (T₀) and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 h after operation (T₁, T₂, T₃, T₄, T₅), at rest and during passive 10° knee flexion. Total analgesic requirements and side effects related to study drugs were recorded.
Results: The VAS scores were significantly higher in groups C and D than in group A and B patients. The differences were significant at T₀, T₁, T₂ and T₃. At T₁, group C and D patients had greater analgesic requirement than groups A and B. No patients developed side effects.
Conclusion: Intra-articular buprenorphine and i.a. bupivacaine, both produced equally good postoperative pain control and allowed a significant reduction of analgesic requirement after knee arthroscopy.     

Combined subfascial and subcutaneous bupivacaine instillation for inguinal hernia wounds

OBJECTIVE: To determine if combined subfascial (SF) and subcutaneous (SC) bupivacaine is more effective than SC bupivacaine only in decreasing postoperative pain and opioid requirement for hernia wounds. METHODS: Sixty consecutive male patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in the SC group (S; n = 30) received SC instillation of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and SF instillation of 10 mL of 0.9% saline, while patients in the combination group (C; n = 30) received SF and SC instillation of 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine each. All injections were given in a standardized manner by the surgeon during wound closure. Postoperative pain was scored by means of a 100 mm visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Pain scores at 1, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively were significantly more in group S patients (53 vs. 30, 41 vs. 32 and 22 vs. 15, respectively, p < 0.0001). First time to analgesia was longer in group C (260 +/- 17 vs. 137 +/- 12 minutes, p < 0.0001). The consumption of pethidine was significantly lower in group C than in group S (23 +/- 34 mg vs. 55 +/- 42 mg, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: SF combined with SC instillation of bupivacaine during wound closure prolongs the first time to analgesia, reduces early postoperative opioid requirements and lowers pain in males undergoing open hernia repair.     

Buprenorphine added to the local anesthetic for brachial plexus block to provide postoperative analgesia in outpatients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the past 10 years, several studies have suggested that the addition of certain opiates to the local anesthetic used for brachial block may provide effective, long-lasting postoperative analgesia. One of these studies indicated that the agonist-antagonist, buprenorphine, added to bupivacaine provided a longer period of postoperative analgesia than the traditional opiates, but in this study, it is impossible to determine the relative contributions of the local anesthetic and the opiate to the postoperative analgesia because of the extremely long duration of the anesthesia provided by the local anesthetic, bupivacaine. By repeating the study using a local anesthetic of a shorter duration, the present study delineates more clearly the contribution of the buprenorphine to postoperative analgesia when added to a shorter-acting local anesthetic. METHODS: Forty, healthy, consenting adult patients scheduled for upper extremity surgery were enrolled in the study. Premedication was provided by intravenous midazolam 2 mg/70 kg and anesthesia by a subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block. The patients were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 equal groups based on the agents used for the blocks. The patients in group I received 40 mL of a local anesthetic alone, while those in group II received the same local anesthetic plus buprenorphine 0.3 mg. The study was kept double-blind by having 1 anesthesiologist prepare the solutions, a second anesthesiologist perform the blocks, and a third anesthesiologist monitor the anesthesia and analgesia thereafter, up to and including the time of the first request for an analgesic medication. The data were reported as means (+/- SEM), and differences between groups were determined using repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi(2), followed by the Fisher exact test for post hoc comparison. A P value of less than.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean duration of postoperative pain relief following the injection of the local anesthetic alone was 5.3 (+/- 0.15) hours as compared with 17.4 (+/- 1.26) hours when buprenorphine was added, a difference that was statistically (and clinically) significant (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of buprenorphine to the local anesthetic used for brachial plexus block in the present study provided a 3-fold increase in the duration of postoperative analgesia, with complete analgesia persisting 30 hours beyond the duration provided by the local anesthetic alone in 75% of the patients. This practice can be of particular benefit to patients undergoing ambulatory upper extremity surgery by providing prolonged analgesia after discharge from the hospital.     

Double-blind comparison of extradural block with three bupivacaine- ketamine mixtures in knee arthroplasty

We have compared 0.5% bupivacaine 75 mg (group A; n = 15) with three 0.5% bupivacaine 75 mg-ketamine mixtures for extradural block in 59 ASA I-III patients undergoing total knee replacement in a randomized, double-blind study. The following doses of preservative-free 1% ketamine were used: 0.3 mg kg-1 (group B: n = 14); 0.5 mg kg-1 (group C: n = 5); and 0.67 mg kg-1 (group D: n = 15). Level of sensory block, degree of motor weakness and sedation scores were recorded before and after operation. Duration of postoperative analgesia was also noted. There was no difference between groups in median maximum level of sensory block (group A: T4 (range T10-T2); group B: T4 (T10-T2); group C: T4 (T8-T2); and group D: T3 (T8-C3)) or in the degree of motor block. Thirty-three of the 44 patients who received ketamine showed signs of systemic absorption (blurred vision, sedation) within 10 min of injection. There was no significant difference between groups in median duration of analgesia (group A: 240 (range 115-340) min; group B: 198 (97-460) min; group C: 150 (122-448) min; and group D: 210 (130- 390) min). No patient suffered any adverse psychomimetic effects. We conclude that at the doses used, addition of ketamine to extradural bupivacaine did not improve extradural block in adult patients undergoing total knee replacement.      

Analgesic efficacy of two doses of intrathecal midazolam with bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery

OBJECTIVES: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 2 doses of intrathecal midazolam as an adjunct to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were allocated randomly to 3 groups: group B, 2 mL hyperbaric bupivicaine 0.5%; group BM1, 2 mL bupivacaine plus midazolam 1 mg (preservative free); and group BM2, 2 mL bupivicaine plus midazolam 2 mg. RESULTS: The mean duration of postoperative analgesia (determined by request for rescue medication) was 3.8 +/- 0.5 hours in group B compared with 4.3 +/- 0.7 hours in group BM1 (P = .18), and 6.1 +/- 1.0 hours in group BM2 (P = .001). Supplemental analgesic requirements with diclofenac were significantly less in group BM2 (93 +/- 29 mg) compared with group B (145 +/- 12 mg) and group BM1 (148 +/- 16 mg, P < .001). Time to block regression was longer in group B (182 +/- 30 minutes) compared with group BM1 (152 +/- 32 minutes) and group B (126 +/- 20 minutes) (both P < .001). Arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, sedation score, and time to first void were comparable between groups. Group B had a significantly higher incidence of nausea and vomiting than groups BM1 and BM2 (P = .02). No neurologic deficits were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal midazolam 2 mg provided a moderate prolongation of postoperative analgesia when used as an adjunct to bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Intrathecal midazolam, 1 mg and 2 mg, decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting.     

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major urologic surgeries. A comparison of tramadol with or without bupivacaine

The efficiency and safety of patient-controlled epidural analgesia by using tramadol alone and combined with bupivacaine were investigated for postoperative pain treatment after major urological surgeries. For PCEA: in group I (n = 17) a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with a continuous infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol at a rate of 8 ml/h was given. In group II (n = 17), patients received an initial loading dose of 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% and a supplemental continuous infusion of 8 ml/h. In group III (n = 17), a loading dose of 20 mg tramadol with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% were given and a supplemental infusion of 1 mg/ml tramadol in 20 ml bupivacaine 0.125% combination was begun with a rate of 8 ml/h. A demand epidural bolus dose of 5 ml with a lockout time of 30 min was also used in all patients. VAS for pain intensity, vital signs, sedation scale and side effects was monitored at 0, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h of the postoperative period. Statistical significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis, Fisher's exact, analysis of variance for repeated measurements and Tukey tests. The hemodynamic values and sedation scales were insignificantly different (p > 0.05). The adequate analgesia was provided in all patients. However VAS values were significantly lower in group III than in groups I and II at every measurement (p < 0.05). The incidence of side effects in all three groups was low (p > 0.05). In conclusion, we suggested that a combination of tramadol with bupivacaine can provide the most effective and safe postoperative analgesia with minimal risk for side effects.     

The optimal dose of ketamine for caudal epidural blockade in children

Sixty boys aged up to 9 years undergoing orchidopexy were randomly allocated to receive one of three solutions for caudal epidural injection: group A received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with 0.25 mg. kg⁻¹of preservative-free ketamine, group B received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with ketamine 0.5mg. kg⁻¹ and group C received 1 ml. kg⁻¹ of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg. kg⁻¹ of ketamine. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a modified Objective Pain Score and analgesia was administered if this score exceeded four. The median duration of caudal analgesia was 7.9h in group A, 11 h in group B and 16.5 h in group C. There were no differences between the groups in the incidence of motor block, urinary retention, postoperative vomiting or postoperative sedation. Group C had a significantly higher incidence of behavioural side effects, including slightly odd behaviour, vacant stares and abnormal effect than groups A and B.     

帕瑞昔布钠不同给药时机对胸科手术病人术后镇痛效果的影响

目的 探讨帕瑞昔布钠不同给药时机对胸科手术病人术后镇痛效果的影响.方法 采用前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲的研究方法.择期肺叶切除手术病人60例,采用随机数字表法,将病人随机分为3组(n=20),A组切皮前30 min和术毕前30 min静脉注射生理盐水2 ml;B组切皮前30 min静脉注射帕瑞昔布钠40 mg,术毕前30 min静脉注射生理盐水2 ml;C组切皮前30 min静脉注射生理盐水2 ml,术毕前30 min静脉注射帕瑞昔布钠40 mg.3组术后48 h内均行吗啡PCIA,维持VAS评分≤3分.术后随访,记录吗啡用量、病人镇痛满意度评分、体温、胸腔引流量及肝、肾和凝血功能情况,记录恶心、呕吐的发生情况.结果 与A组比较,B组和C组吗啡用量减少,病人镇痛满意度评分升高,体温降低(P＜0.05或0.01),B组与C组吗啡用量,镇痛满意度评分和体温比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).3组间凝血功能指标、肝肾功能指标、胸腔引流量和恶心呕吐发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 切皮前30 min与术毕前30 min静脉注射帕瑞昔布钠40 mg辅助术后镇痛效果相似,均可有效增强胸科手术病人术后吗啡镇痛效果,减少术后发热的发生.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the effect of different time administration of parecoxib sodium on the postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Methods This was a prospective,randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sixty ASA Ⅰ orⅡ patients aged 17-83 yr undergoing pulmonary lobectomy were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups (n=20 each):A, B and C groups. Group A received normal saline 2 ml at 30 min before skin incision and the end of operation. Group B received iv parecoxib sodium 40 mg at 30 min before skin incision and normal saline 2 ml at 30 min before the end of operation. Group C received normal saline 2 ml at 30 min before skin incision and iv parecoxib sodium 40 mg at 30 min before the end of operation. All the patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine and VAS score was maintained≤3. The patients were followed up after operation.The morphine consumption, patients' global evaluation of the postoperative analgesia (0-100, 0=worst pain, 100=no pain), nausea and vomiting, body temperature , volume o chest drainage, hepatic, renal and blood coagulation function were recorded. Results Compared with group A, the morphine consumption was significantly reduced, the patient' s satisfaction score increased and body temperature decreased in B and C groups(P＜0.05 or 0.01). There was no significant difference in the morphine consumption, patient's satisfaction score and body temperature between B and C groups(P＞0.05). No significant difference was found in the parameters of hepatic, renal and blood coagulation function, volume of chest drainage and incidence of nausea and vomiting among the three groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion When postoperative analgesia is assisted with iv parecoxib sodium 40 mg given at 30 min before skin incision or at 30 min beforethe end of operation,the efficacy is similar,and both can improve the postoperative analgesic efficacy of morphine and reduce fever after operation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.     

Alkalinisation of bupivacaine for sciatic nerve blockade

This double-blind study investigates the effect of pH adjustment of bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline 1:200,000 on block latency, duration of analgesia and systemic absorption of local anaesthetic after sciatic nerve blockade. Twenty-four adult patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups: Group A (n = 12) received bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 (pH 3.9) 2 mg/kg, while Group B (n = 12) received alkalinised bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 (pH 6.4) 2 mg/kg. Increasing the pH of the local anaesthetic solution significantly reduced block latency from 25 minutes in Group A to 12.5 minutes in Group B (p less than 0.001) and prolonged the duration of useful analgesia from 14.1 hours to 18.3 hours (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in plasma bupivacaine levels between the two groups. The results indicate that alkalinisation of bupivacaine reduces time to onset and prolongs the duration of useful analgesia when used for sciatic nerve blockade, without significantly increasing systemic absorption.     

Analgesic effects of epidurally administered fentanyl for postoperative pain relief--comparison with buprenorphine]

We did a retrospective study on 177 patients after upper and lower abdominal surgery, and compared the efficacy of epidural administration of fentanyl and that of buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief. In fentanyl (F) group, 73 patients received fentanyl 0.1 mg with saline 8 ml epidurally after operation, followed by a constant rate infusion of 0.025 mg.hr-1 for 18-24 hrs. In buprenorphine (B) group, 104 patients, received buprenorphine 0.2 mg with saline 9 ml epidurally. After upper abdominal surgery, 33 patients (76.7%) in F group and 27 patients (52.9%) in B group obtained satisfactory analgesia (P < 0.05). The difference of the degree of analgesia after lower abdominal surgery was not significantly different in both groups. Respiratory depression occurred in 19 patients in B group and 5 patients in F group (P < 0.05). It is concluded that epidural fentanyl delivered by continuous infusion offers a significant advantage compared with epidural buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief following upper abdominal surgery.     

布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛安全性探讨

目的探讨布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛的效果、并发症及安全陛。方法1600例行连续术后硬膜外镇痛的患者,按所用镇痛药物配伍不同分为：0．1％布比卡因＋5μg／ml芬太尼组（B组,n=920）和0．2％罗哌卡因＋2μg／ml芬太尼组（R组,n=680）。对两组镇痛效果（视觉模拟评分及患者对镇痛效果的满意度）、并发症和处理措施进行总结分析。结果视觉模拟评分两组无差异（P〉0．05）。患者对镇痛的满意度R组明显高于B组（P〉0．05）。并发症的发生率B组高于R组（P〉0．05）。两组内年龄≥60岁的患者低血压的发生率高于年龄〈60岁者（P〈0．05）;女性患者恶心呕吐的发生率高于男性（P〈0．05）;腰段硬膜外镇痛患者下肢乏力或麻木的发生率明显高于胸段硬膜外镇痛患者（P〈0．05）。结论布比卡因、罗哌卡因与芬太尼不同配伍均可安全有效地用于连续术后硬膜外镇痛,罗哌卡因组并发症较少,并发症的发生与镇痛药物、年龄、性别及硬膜外置管部位有关。     

Postoperative pain relief by continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine and buprenorphine]

Continuous postoperative pain relief produced by epidural block with bupivacaine and buprenorphine was evaluated in 12 patients after thoracotomy, 19 patients after upper abdominal surgery, and 14 patients after lower abdominal surgery. Patients initially received 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1 mg of buprenorphine at recovery room in operating theater and continuously received the mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 5 micrograms.ml-1 buprenorphine at a rate of 1 ml.h-1 using a portable pump. About fifty percent of the patients did not need additional narcotics during 48 postoperative hours. About ninety percent of the patients needed one additional narcotics during 48 postoperative hours. The authors conclude that epidural analgesia with the mixture of bupivacaine and buprenorphine produces satisfactory postoperative pain relief.     

Peripheral opioid analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Recent research has revealed that opioids can act directly on the peripheral terminals of afferent nerves to mediate antinociception. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of peripheral morphine administration on the nociception process in the postoperative period. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into 5 groups. Group M patients (n=30) received local infiltration at trocar insertion points with 2 mg morphine in 20 mL of 0.9% NaCl solution (5 mL of solution per point) 10 minutes before the operation. For group B patients (n=30), the solution used for infiltration was 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine; for group M+B patients (n=30), the solution was 2 mg morphine in 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine; and for group S patients (n=30), the solution was 20 mL 0.9% NaCl. For group S+M patients (n=30), trocar insertion points were infiltrated with 20 mL of 0.9% NaCl, and patients in this group were given 2 mg of subcutaneous morphine 10 minutes before the surgery. Postoperative analgesic therapy was provided by on-demand analgesia with tramadol. After surgery, the following were measured: pain intensity scored on the visual analog scale, total tramadol requirement, time from the end of the surgical procedure to the administration of the first dose of tramadol, and the frequency of undesirable side effects (sedation, nausea, and vomiting). RESULTS: Pain intensity and total tramadol requirement after surgery were lower in groups M, B, and M+B compared with groups S and S+M, but these differences were not statistically significant. The time from the completion of the operation to the administration of the first dose of tramadol was significantly longer in groups M, B, and M+B compared with groups S and S+M. CONCLUSION: Results of the study confirm the possibility of modifying the nociception process in the postoperative period through peripheral opioid administration.     

Spinal ropivacaine or bupivacaine for cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of ropivacaine and bupivacaine given intrathecally in combination with morphine for cesarean delivery. METHODS: With ethical committee approval and a written informed consent, 60 women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive spinal anesthesia with either 20 mg ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine (n = 30) or 15 mg bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine (n = 30). Profile of spinal block (onset and recovery times), cardiovascular effects, and quality of postoperative analgesia (patient-controlled morphine) were recorded by a blinded observer. RESULTS: The onset time of motor block was shorter after bupivacaine (8 +/- 2 min) than after ropivacaine (12 +/- 5 minutes) (P <.05), whereas duration of both sensory and motor blocks was longer after bupivacaine (139 +/- 37 minutes and 254 +/- 76 minutes) than after ropivacaine (112 +/- 27 minutes and 211 +/- 48 minutes) (P <.01 and P <.05, respectively). No differences in intraoperative quality of anesthesia and clinical hypotension requiring ephedrine administration were observed between the two groups. Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups; however median consumption of patient-controlled morphine during the first 24 hours after surgery was higher in patients of group Ropivacaine (5 mg; range, 0 to 18 mg) than in patients of group Bupivacaine (2 mg; range, 0 to 7 mg) (P <.01). CONCLUSION: Spinal anesthesia produced with 20 mg ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine is as effective and safe as that provided by 15 mg bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg morphine, with an earlier recovery of sensory and motor functions after surgery.