����-�����������ƴ������������������������Ч�ȽϷ���

目的比较手术—正畸联合治疗唇侧和腭侧上颌埋伏阻生尖牙的临床疗效。方法对广东省深圳市宝安区人民医院口腔正畸门诊2004—2009年收治的60例埋伏阻生尖牙患者(均为单颗埋伏阻生尖牙患者,共60颗牙),根据全口曲面断层片和X线定位片分为唇侧组和腭侧组各30颗牙,通过手术开窗去除阻力骨、暴露部分牙冠、黏结正畸附件,在固定矫正技术的牵引下将埋伏阻生的尖牙纳入正常牙弓内。对比两组治疗的成功率和治疗所需的时间。结果治疗成功率唇侧组为80.0%,腭侧组为96.7%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后正畸牵引的时间腭侧组为(9.2±3.2)个月,而唇侧组为(15.1±4.1)个月,明显长于腭侧组,两组比较差异亦有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论经手术开窗正畸牵引,上颌埋伏阻生尖牙的成功率腭侧组大于唇侧组,牵引到位的时间腭侧组也较唇侧组短。     

上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的临床分析

目的对上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的患病特点及治疗结果进行分析,以期为临床治疗上颌尖牙埋伏阻生提供参考数据。方法在北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院正畸科门诊2001年1月至2005年1月期间诊治的10505例错(牙合)畸形患者中,经CT检查选出上颌尖牙埋伏阻生患者215例(汉族),共有埋伏阻生尖牙248颗。统计上颌尖牙埋伏阻生在正畸患者中所占比例,χ~2检验分别比较患者性别、唇腭侧阻生以及相应治疗情况的差异。结果上颌尖牙埋伏阻生在正畸门诊患者中约占2．05%,女性：男性为1．8∶1,唇侧：腭侧为2．1∶1。“外科手术暴露+正畸牵引”的方式在治疗中占主导地位。“外科手术拔除”的治疗方式在腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙中的应用多于唇侧,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论本组患者上颌尖牙埋伏阻生以女性、唇侧多见,临床对唇腭侧尖牙埋伏阻生的治疗存在一定差异。     

正畸牵引联合牙槽外科矫治上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的临床观察

目的 观察正畸牵引联合牙槽外科手术矫治上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的临床疗效。方法 对30例上颌尖牙埋伏阻生病例,利用正畸牵引联合牙槽外科手术进行矫治。结果 6例埋伏尖牙,经开拓间隙或减数助萌治疗,3～5个月后自然萌出;24例行牙槽外科开窗术配合正畸牵引,8～12个月后萌出。牙髓活力正常,牙龈形态美观,牙周情况良好。结论 正畸牵引联合牙槽外科手术,可快速有效地矫治上颌埋伏阻生尖牙。     

上颌阻生尖牙牵引治疗后邻近切牙牙根吸收情况的研究

目的 分析上颌阻生尖牙正畸牵引治疗后邻近切牙的牙根吸收情况及可能的相关因素。方法 选取上颌尖牙阻生且符合标准的43例患者,年龄10～23岁,共60颗上颌埋伏阻生尖牙。上颌阻生尖牙正畸牵引治疗前后分别拍摄锥形束CT,分析阻生尖牙邻近切牙的牙根吸收程度,并对可能存在的相关因素进行分析。结果 上颌阻生尖牙正畸牵引治疗后,上颌中切牙发生轻、中、重度牙根吸收的概率分别为71.7%、15.0%、13.3%,上颌侧切牙发生轻、中、重度牙根吸收的概率分别为48.3%、36.7%、15.0%,上颌中切牙与侧切牙牙根吸收严重程度存在差异(P<0.05)。位于腭侧及颌骨内、低位且靠近面中线的阻生尖牙,在正畸牵引治疗后,侧切牙牙根吸收程度较重(P<0.05)。低位阻生尖牙牵引治疗后,中切牙牙根吸收较重(P<0.05)。牵引时间较长时,中切牙牙根吸收程度较重(P<0.05)。治疗前已发生牙根吸收的切牙,在阻生尖牙牵引治疗后发生的牙根吸收程度较重(P<0.05)。结论 上颌侧切牙在阻生尖牙正畸牵引治疗后,发生的牙根吸收程度较重。上颌阻生尖牙正畸牵引治疗后,邻近切牙牙根吸收情况与阻生尖...     

成人上颌埋伏阻生尖牙的治疗分析

尖牙与颌面部美观和咀嚼功能关系密切,上颌埋伏阻生尖牙的发生率约为1.5%～2%,保存尖牙并引导其到正常的位置至关重要。本文对成人上颌埋伏阻生尖牙行开窗术联合正畸治疗,取得较好效果,报道如下。     

应用全景片预测上颌阻生尖牙正畸治疗时间的探讨

目的： 应用全景片评估上颌阻生尖牙的特征（角度、线距和位置）对正畸牵引时间的影响。方法： 选取60例进行正畸牵引治疗的上颌单侧阻生尖牙患者,通过全景片测量治疗前患者上颌阻生尖牙的特征（角度、线距和位置）,采用SPSS19.0软件包中的多元回归分析影响正畸牵引时间的相关因素。结果： 治疗前阻生尖牙的角度、线距和位置与正畸牵引时间显著相关,性别和左右侧位置对牵引治疗时间无显著影响。结论： 阻生尖牙的角度、距离和位置可以预测正畸牵引时间。     

上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的外科-正畸联合治疗

目的:探讨尖牙埋伏阻生的外科-正畸联合治疗方法。方法:20例患者28颗上颌埋伏阻生尖牙,先用滑动直丝弓矫治器初步排齐牙列后,再局部间隙扩展,采用外科闭合式助萌技术,暴露埋伏尖牙牙冠,粘贴托槽,再进行正畸牵引导萌。结果:24颗埋伏尖牙均牵引入正常牙列,牙髓、牙周情况正常。有4颗尖牙因横位阻生和根冠成角采用外科拔除。结论:通过外科手术暴露和正畸牵引导萌联合治疗,能有效矫治埋伏阻生尖牙。     

上颌腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙 CBCT 导引下的牵引治疗

目的:探讨锥形束CT(CBCT)三维(3D)重建在上颌腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙牵引治疗中的指导作用。方法:对22例上颌尖牙(共26颗)腭侧埋伏阻生的青少年患者行CBCT检查。CBCT三维重建观察尖牙形态、腭侧埋伏状况,测量分析与邻近组织的位置关系及相邻切牙牙根吸收情况。结果:CBCT能够真实再现颌骨内埋伏的上颌尖牙。埋伏尖牙均近中倾斜,与平面平均成角61.1°±18.1°,近中异位分别为Ⅰ类埋伏尖牙8颗、Ⅱ类5颗、Ⅲ类3颗、Ⅳ类10颗。3颗相邻侧切牙及2颗中切牙因严重牙根吸收而拔除;26颗上颌腭侧埋伏尖牙均成功牵引至平面排入牙弓并建立正常咬合。结论:CBCT能立体再现上颌尖牙腭侧埋伏阻生特征及与邻近牙的关系等,对治疗方案的制定、开窗牵引具有指导作用,可提高疗效。     

上颌唇侧水平埋伏阻生尖牙正畸导萌的力学原理分析

目的：分析上颌唇侧埋伏阻生尖牙正畸导萌的力学原理，探讨上颌唇侧埋伏阻生尖牙的矫治力方向设计以及改良Nance弓的作用。方法：采用自行设计的改良Nance弓辅以直丝矫治器，对5例上颌唇侧水平埋伏阻生尖牙进行正畸一外科联合治疗，比较分析了直接牵引和改良Nance弓辅助牵引二种方式的矫治力方向，埋伏牙的移动方式及其力学原理。结果：5例上颌唇侧水平埋伏阻生尖牙顺利萌出至正常位置，尖牙及邻近侧切牙牙髓、牙周健康。力学原理分析显示采用改良Nance弓矫治方法，埋伏牙的移动方式更合理，所需矫治力更轻，支抗负荷更小。结论：矫治上颌唇侧水平埋伏阻生尖牙时，要合理设计矫治力方向，改良Nance弓是一种符合生理力学需要的辅助装置。     

上颌尖牙埋伏阻生正畸治疗的研究进展

埋伏阻生牙是正畸临床中经常遇到的问题,尤其是上颌尖牙,埋伏阻生的几率较高.埋伏阻生牙病因复杂,埋伏阻生的类型各异,临床表现不尽相同,正畸治疗较困难.本文对上颌尖牙埋伏阻生的病因、患病率、埋伏阻生类型、临床诊断定位以及正畸治疗方法作一综述.     

Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines.

This study was undertaken to examine the success rate and the length of orthodontic treatment of impacted maxillary canines in adult patients. A sample of 19 adults (mean age, 28.8 +/- 8.6 years; range, 20-47 years), who had been treated for a total of 23 impacted maxillary canines, was compared with a younger control group (mean age, 13.7 +/- 1.3 years; range, 12-16 years). The control subjects were chosen for a similar degree of impaction difficulty by carefully matching the positions of the impacted canines in the 3 planes of space. The success rate among the adults was 69.5% compared with 100% among the younger controls. The lower success rate was due to 5 canines that had failed to erupt and 2 canines that had been partially extruded but could not be aligned in the arch. The duration of treating the overall malocclusion of the adults and young subjects did not materially differ. However, the adults showed significant increases in the duration and number of treatment visits required for resolving the canine impaction, in both the simpler and the more difficult cases. When further divided by age, all the failed canines were found in the older (over 30) adult subgroup. It was concluded that the prognosis for successful orthodontic resolution of an impacted canine in an adult is lower than that in a younger patient and that the prognosis worsens with age. Furthermore, when such treatment is undertaken, its successful completion should be expected to take considerably longer.     

The closed eruption technique in cases of impaction of permanent maxillary canines

The impaction of permanent maxillary canines occurs frequently. In recent decades, research has led to 2 methods of treatment: the modified window technique and the closed eruption technique. Although these methods have been described in detail, it is still not clear which method is most effective. In a study involving 73 orthodontic patients with an impacted, palatally displaced permanent maxillary canine, this cuspid was exposed by means of a gingival flap and an orthodontic bracket was immediately fixed on the exposed canine, after which the gingival flap was repositioned using sutures. The patients were clinically and radiographically examined 3 months after the orthodontic treatment. In a control group consisting of 93 orthodontic patients, there were no cases of impacted permanent maxillary cuspids. The overall success rate for the treatment in the study group was 63%. Problems in adjacent teeth were correlated significantly with older age among the patients. There was a significant difference in the number of pockets around the teeth adjacent to the canines in the study group and in the control group.     

Factors that relate to treatment duration for patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines.

The objectives of this study were to determine the relationship between the initial position of a palatally impacted maxillary canine (as seen on a panoramic radiograph) and the duration of orthodontic treatment and to determine whether a difference in treatment duration existed between patients with bilateral palatally impacted canines and patients with unilateral impaction. A total of 47 adolescent subjects were chosen (9 subjects with unilateral impactions and 18 subjects with bilateral impactions). All subjects had full fixed orthodontic appliances placed. The treatment duration of this group was compared with that of a control group with similar characteristics but without the impacted canine. The results showed that the average duration of treatment was 22.4 months for the control group, 25.8 months for the unilateral-impacted group, and 32.3 months for the bilateral-impacted canine group. The length of treatment for the impacted canine sample was related to the age of the patient at the start of treatment; younger patients required a longer treatment. The younger the patient, the more severely impacted the canine. The bilateral-impacted canine group had at least 1 canine that was more severely impacted than the impacted canine in the unilateral-impacted group. If the canine was impacted less than 14 mm from the occlusal plane, treatment duration averaged 23.8 months; if the canine was impacted more than 14 mm from the occlusal plane, treatment duration averaged 31.1 months.     

Comparisons of different treatment methods and their outcomes for impacted maxillary and mandibular canines: A retrospective study

BackgroundImpacted canines may pose a functional and an esthetic problem for patients and can affect neighboring incisors. The aim of the study was to compare different treatment methods and their outcomes for impacted maxillary and mandibular canines.MethodsThe authors included 102 patients with 118 impacted canines (82 maxillary and 36 mandibular canines). Impacted canine were confirmed during clinical and radiologic examinations. Eighty-five patients (83%) with 97 impacted canines started the treatment. The authors analyzed treatment types and outcomes. Two maxillary and 4 mandibular canines were scheduled for extraction.ResultsOrthodontic extrusion was used most frequently to treat impacted maxillary canines (89%), whereas orthodontic extrusion and transalveolar transplantation were performed most frequently in impacted mandibular canines (33% and 37.5%, respectively). The treatment was successful in 96% of the maxillary and 95% of the impacted mandibular canines.ConclusionsDifferent methods were used for impacted maxillary and mandibular canines, but their overall success rate was high.Practical ImplicationsSuccessful outcome is determined via a well-planned and carefully executed orthodontic and surgical treatment. Early diagnosis is pivotal in facilitating spontaneous canine eruption and implementing transalveolar transplantation in a timely way.     

Traction of an impacted maxillary canine with corticotomy in a 53-year-old patient: Case report

The viability of orthodontic traction of impacted teeth in adults is often questioned by a large percentage of orthodontists who would rather consider the extraction of these teeth. Although possible, orthodontic traction of impacted canines in adults takes longer than in younger patients, present a poorer prognosis that worsens with age. Because of the prevalence of periodontitis in adults versus children, periodontal inflammation must be identified and resolved in order to keep attachment loss from progressing during orthodontic care. Likewise mucogingival changes need to be predicted and managed. This article reports a successful case of impacted maxillary right canine traction in an adult female, associated with alveolar corticotomies and the use of skeletal anchorage. At the end of treatment, the canine was ideally positioned in the occlusion, presenting excellent esthetics, function, and healthy periodontal tissues.     

Orthodontic treatment of palatally impacted maxillary canines

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of treating children with impacted maxillary canines by orthodontic treatment alone. The subjects were 28 children (mean age: 13.5 years, range 11.4-16.1 years) with between them 32 palatally impacted canines. The overlying primary canines were extracted between 0 and 42 months before the start of appliance treatment to open space in the arches for the impacted teeth. No other surgical procedures were carried out prior to the start of appliance treatment. Appliance treatment was deferred for at least six months if an impacted canine was the main reason for treatment, otherwise treatment was commenced according to the needs of the patient. In 94% of the cases, the severity of impaction lessened following extraction of the overlying primary canines and orthodontic treatment. The deepest impactions tended to occur in the oldest children. The majority (75%) of the canines emerged following orthodontic treatment to create space for them in the arch; the remainder were surgically exposed. Appliance treatment tended to take longer in children with the deepest impactions. It is concluded that fixed appliance treatment to create space for a palatally impacted canine is an effective management option for children with impacted maxillary canines.     

Initial vertical and horizontal position of palatally impacted maxillary canine and effect on periodontal status following surgical-orthodontic treatment

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of surgical-orthodontic treatment and the initial vertical and mesiodistal position of palatally impacted maxillary canines on the periodontal health of impacted canines and adjacent teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 32 patients with unilateral palatally impacted maxillary canines. The initial position of the impacted canines was assessed on panoramic images. The treatment protocol of the impacted canines included surgical exposure with the closed-eruption technique and fixed orthodontic appliances. RESULTS: A significant increase in pocket depth was found at the canine mesiopalatal point after surgical-orthodontic treatment. Also, a correlation was found between the initial mesiodistal and vertical position of the impacted canine and the posttreatment periodontal status of the impacted canine, the adjacent lateral incisor, and the first premolar. CONCLUSIONS: A combined surgical-orthodontic approach in the treatment of impacted maxillary canines produces clinically acceptable periodontal conditions. The average increase in pocket depth was less than 4 mm and clinically unimportant for most patients.     

改良Nance弓在矫治上颌腭侧埋伏尖牙的作用

目的 探讨改良Nance弓在矫治上颌腭侧埋伏尖牙时矫治力方向设计及支抗设计的作用.方法 7例单侧上颌腭侧埋伏尖牙均采用外科-正畸联合治疗.手术暴露埋伏尖牙牙冠,粘接舌侧扣;戴入改良Nance弓,利用改良Nance弓位于腭侧不锈钢丝上的附钩,先将尖牙冠向后牵引绕过侧切牙的牙根,直到位于正常尖牙间隙的腭侧,如尖牙间隙不足,则粘结上颌托槽,预备尖牙间隙;再采用直丝弓技术将埋伏尖牙向唇侧移动,排齐牙列,调整咬合关系.对治疗后牙齿的松动度、牙髓活力等进行观察.结果 7位埋伏尖牙均被牵引至牙弓的正常位置;牙髓活力测试正常,牙周附着良好.结论 改良Nance弓在矫治上颌腭侧埋伏尖牙时,在矫治力方向设计和支抗控制方面有独特优点和作用.