达利珠单抗和OKT3预防肾移植术后急性排斥反应的比较

目的　比较达利珠单抗和OKT3预防肾移植术后早期急性排斥反应的效果。方法　肾移植受者在使用环孢素A(或他克莫司 )、霉酚酸酯及激素预防急性排斥反应的基础上加用达利珠单抗 (42例 )或OKT3(12 8例 ) ,观察 2个组肾移植术后 3个月内急性排斥反应发生率。结果　肾移植术后 3个月内 ,使用达利珠单抗者急性排斥反应发生率为 2 .4 % ,明显低于使用OKT3者的13.3% (P <0 .0 5 ) ,且前者无耐激素者 ,急性排斥反应的发生时间推迟 ,血肌酐恢复正常的时间也早于使用OKT3者。结论　达利珠单抗预防肾移植术后急性排斥反应的效果优于OKT3。     

Use of simulect can reduce the incidence of acute rejection and demonstrates with superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation

Background

Acute rejection is a major cause of graft loss in renal transplantation. Because the highest risk for acute rejection is in the first month posttransplantation, improved prophylaxis could be most beneficial in this period. Simulect administration provides 30 to 45 days of immunoprophylaxis against acute rejection during the critical period after transplantation.

Objectives

We sought to assess the incidence of acute rejection episodes and the safety and tolerability of Simulect plus Neoral immunosuppression. Patient and graft survival rates up to 3 years posttransplantation were evaluated.

Method

Forty-one transplant recipients received Simulect by intravenous infusion of an initial 20-mg dose on the day of renal transplantation and a second 20-mg dose on day 4 posttransplant. All renal recipients received immunosuppression with Neoral and steroid.

Results

There were eight cases (19.5%) of acute rejection within 1 year. The rejection episodes were easily reversed with steroid pulse therapy in seven patients except for graft loss. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival rates were 95%, 93%, and 88%, respectively. Overall, the 3-year patient survival rate was 100%.

Conclusions

Simulect in combination with Neoral and steroid-reduced the incidence of acute rejection without an increase in adverse events. The low incidence and severity of acute rejection may have led to the superior 3-year patient and graft survival rates in renal transplantation.     

Mycophenolate mofetil: ten years' experience of a renal transplant unit

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use in renal transplantation has allowed a significant decrease in early acute rejection rates. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of acute rejection episodes, renal function at the first year posttransplant, patient and graft survivals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rate, influence of the degree of sensitization, and number of MHC antigen mismatches on graft survival in two groups of patients receiving either MMF or azathioprine. Group 1 included 149 patients receiving cyclosporine, MMF, and prednisolone; group 2 included 191 patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, degree of sensitization (expressed as percentage of antibodies reactive to panel), MHC mismatch number, cold ischemia time, donor age, or anti-thymocyte globulin induction. In group 1 (MMF) there was a significant decrease in early acute rejection rate (19% vs 57%, P < .0001), longer graft survival at 10 years (92% vs 75%, P = .006), and higher rate of CMV infection (22% vs 12%, P = .004). Renal function at the first year posttransplant and patient survival during follow-up did not differ between the groups. The degree of sensitization influenced graft survival in group 2. The number of MHC mismatches did not influence graft survival in either group. With MMF, there was a significant reduction in early acute rejection rate, a significant increase in graft survival at 10-year follow-up, and diminished impact of the degree of sensitization on graft survival.     

Clear benefit of mycophenolate mofetil-based triple therapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after living donor renal transplantations.

BACKGROUND: According to a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical studies concerning the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) proved superior to azathioprine or placebo in conjunction with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. MMF-treated patients showed reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection, similar graft survival, and better graft function over 12 months. However, the multicenter trials did not include the Asian recipients of living donor kidneys. METHODS: To assess the efficacy of MMF as the third component of a triple therapy in addition to CsA-Neoral and steroids in living donor renal transplantation recipients in Asians, a total of 100 recipients were randomized to receive CsA-Neoral and steroids (control group, n=50), or MMF-based triple therapy (1.0 g of MMF twice daily from postoperative day 2, MMF group, n=50). The dosing plan for Neoral and steroids was essentially same between groups. During 12 months of follow-up, we compared the incidence of acute rejection, adverse events such as infections, and 12-month actual graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The graft and patient survival at 1 year was excellent in both groups: 96/98% in the control group and 98/100% in the MMF group, respectively. MMF significantly reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of acute rejection (34% in the control group vs. 14% in the MMF group), cumulative incidence of acute rejection episodes (46% vs. 16%), and requirement of antilymphocyte antibody (21.7% vs. 12.5%). In the MMF group, viral infection such as herpes zoster or chicken pox was more prevalent than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Like cadaveric renal transplantation, this open clinical trial showed MMF to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection if used in conjunction with Neoral and steroids after living donor renal transplantation in Asian ethnicity.     

Basiliximab (Simulect) in acute tubular necrosis high-risk kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect) therapy reduces acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation. Posttransplant acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is a predisposing factor for acute rejection and reduced graft survival. Anti-lymphocyte antibodies have been used to delay the use of calcineurin antagonists in patients receiving cadaveric renal transplants and to prevent acute rejection episodes. The aim of our study was to learn about the effects of Simulect on ATN in high-risk cadaveric renal transplantation recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 93 patients including, 45 who received Simulect (20 mg before transplantation and 20 mg at day 4 posttransplant and 48 patients who did not receive Simulect. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil, steroids, and cyclosporine (46%) or tacrolimus (54%). We defined ATN as the need for dialysis during the first week after transplantation. Risk factors for ATN were: cold ischemia time, donor and recipient age, donor cause of death as stroke, HLA matching, and panel-reactive antibodies. RESULTS: Among 54 patients who experienced ATN, 44% were in the Simulect group and 71% in the other group (P = .01). In the regression analysis, Simulect was shown to be a protective factor: 0.19 (0.05 to 0.62). Presence of de novo diabetes was more frequent in the group that did not receive Simulect (16 [33%] vs 6 [13%]; P = .02). Acute rejection episodes were similar in both groups: 2.5% in the Simulect group versus 4% in the other group (P = .34). CMV infections occurred in 15 patients (33%) from the Simulect group and in 20 patients (42%) in the other group. Seven patients died in the Simulect group, and five patients died in the other group. In general, Simulect was well tolerated and the degree of complications was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Simulect reduced the incidence of ATN among patients receiving a high-risk renal graft. It was well tolerated and no adverse effects were observed. The use of Simulect should be considered for patients receiving renal grafts at high risk for ATN.     

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on recurrent rejection in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable adjunctive agent in renal transplantation. However, due to intolerable adverse effects associated with MMF use in our transplant population, we have used MMF selectively in patients at high risk for recurrent graft rejection, since these patients are known to be at risk for poor long-term graft outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of MMF in preventing the recurrence of acute rejection following an initial rejection episode in kidney transplant patients in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were given MMF prospectively following treatment of their initial rejection episode to prevent recurrent rejection. MMF 1-2 g/d was given. Doses were adjusted based on tolerance; MMF therapy was to be continued for at least 6 months. The control group consisted of 124 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who had received standard anti-rejection therapy without the addition of MMF. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted predominantly of cyclosporine, prednisone+/-azathioprine. Anti-rejection therapy for both groups consisted of either corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. for 3 d or oral prednisone 2 mg/kg/d with rapid taper over 3 wk), OKT3 5 mg/d for 10 d or ATG 15 mg/kg/d for 10 d. All rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The majority of rejection episodes were characterized histologically as mild or moderate. Most patients (76%) received corticosteroids for treatment of their first rejection episode. There was a 68% reduction in the incidence of recurrent rejection episodes within the first year of transplant in patients receiving MMF; only 14% of recipients receiving MMF developed recurrent rejection compared to 44% of patients in the control group (p<0.05). Approximately 50% of patients developed MMF-associated adverse effects (leukopenia, GI toxicity). Only 52% of patients remained on MMF at 6 months. One-yr graft survival was 86% in the MMF group and 89% in the control group (p>0.05). One-year patient survival was 93 and 100%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MMF to maintenance therapy for patients experiencing acute renal allograft rejection may prevent recurrent rejection episodes in the subsequent follow-up year.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.     

Induction versus noninduction therapy in kidney transplantation: considering different PRA levels and different induction therapies

To evaluate the rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and long-term results in different levels of anti-HLA sensitization, using noninduction or different induction therapies, 763 patients who underwent transplantation from January 1995 to December 2001 were evaluated: 213 patients received induction therapy, 71 received Thymoglobulin (Thymo), 66 Simulect, and 44 OKT3. Follow-up time was at least 1 year for all groups. The Simulect group included older recipients and the OKT3 group had more female patients. Simulect and OKT3 groups had more black patients; Thymo and OKT3 groups had more retransplantations. PRA was low in the noninduction group (mean, 7%) and about the same in the Simulect and Thymo groups (mean, 30%). OKT3 was the most sensitized group (mean = 59%). Dialysis during the first posttransplantation week was more frequent among the induction groups (43% vs 65%; P <.005). Fewer patients experienced rejection episodes in the Thymo group (20% vs 50%; P =.02). Patients were classified according to their level of sensitization, and the Thymo group showed the lower rejection rates in all levels (mean, 20%; P =.001). When analyzing PRA >50%, the Thymo group showed lower rejection rates (12% vs 50%; P =.02). At this level of sensitization, there was no significant difference on graft loss and death with a functioning graft. There was a trend to more cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the Thymo group (33% vs 23%; P =.08). Two PTLD were diagnosed, both in the noninduction group. Renal function was better in the Thymo group (1.3 mg/dL). In conclusion, Thymo showed lower ACR rates in all PRA groups. No significant differences in CMV infection, tumors, and patient survival were observed.     

Sirolimus rescue therapy for refractory rejection in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera. METHODS: All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred). RESULTS: Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups. CONCLUSION: RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.     

A randomized, double-blind trial of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis plus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to assess whether immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) could reduce the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine. METHODS: Three hundred forty patients received either placebo or basiliximab at a dose of 20 mg, given intravenously on days 0 and 4. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included the safety and tolerability of basiliximab and placebo, 1-year patient and graft survival, and significant medical events up to 12 months. RESULTS: During the first 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection occurred in 20.8% of patients given basiliximab versus 34.9% of patients administered placebo (P=0.005). Similarly, there was a reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months in the patients receiving basiliximab (P=0.023). One-year patient survival was 97.6% with basiliximab and 97.1% with placebo, graft survival was 91.5% versus 88.4%, respectively (NS). The adverse-events profile of patients treated with basiliximab was indistinguishable from that of patients treated with placebo. The number of patients with infections was similar (65.5% for basiliximab vs. 65.7% for placebo), including cytomegalovirus infections (17.3% vs. 14.5%, P=0.245). Nine neoplasms (three in the basiliximab group, six in the placebo arm) were recorded up to 1 year from transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab in combination with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine triple therapy was highly effective in reducing the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection without increasing the incidence of infections and other side effects.     

HLA mismatches remain risk factors for acute kidney allograft rejection in patients receiving quadruple immunosuppression with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies

BACKGROUND: New immunosuppressive drugs such as anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (aIL2R) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have reduced the incidence of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Whether matching donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens is still relevant in patients receiving modern immunosuppression has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and risk factors of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year and the impact of acute rejection on long-term graft survival in a cohort of 208 renal transplant patients treated with aIL2R (basiliximab, n=166; daclizumab, n=42), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, n=180; cyclosporin, n=28), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Graft and patient survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for acute rejection were analyzed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were treated for acute rejection (26 biopsy-proven) during the first posttransplant year. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of first-year acute rejection was 13.2%. The number of HLA mismatches (odds ratio [OR] 1.65 per HLA mismatch) and long periods of dialysis before transplantation (OR 3.1 for more than 4 years of dialysis) were the only independent risk factors for first-year acute rejection. First-year acute rejection was associated with a significant reduction in overall and death-censored graft survival at 5 years after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although infrequent in patients receiving modern immunosuppressive drugs, acute rejection remains an important risk factor for graft loss after renal transplantation. Our results suggest that better HLA matching and shorter periods of dialysis before transplantation could reduce acute rejection rates and further improve outcomes under current immunosuppressive regimens.     

骁悉、环孢素A和泼尼松在肾移植受者联合应用中最适剂量探讨

目的探讨国人肾移植后骁悉(MMF)、环孢素A(CsA)和泼尼松(Pred)联合应用的最适剂量。方法比较常规剂量组(104例)和低剂量组(96例)患者肾移植术后免疫抑制剂用量和急性排斥反应、肺部感染发生率和人/移植肾生存率。结果MMF和CsA用量在术后3个月、Pred用量在术后6个月内常规剂量组明显高于低剂量组。常规剂量组在6个月内包括活检证实、临床推断和亚临床排斥,其总的急性排斥发生率为17.3%,而低剂量组为19.8%,两组间差异无显著性意义(P=0.55)。两组患者在6个月内肺部感染发生率分别为40.4%和11.5%(P<0.0001),尤其是重症肺部感染发生率常规剂量组明显要高(26.9%比5.2%,P<0.0001)。两组患者人/肾1年生存率分别为87.4%/85.5%和97.9%/96.9%(P均<0.01)。排除感染所致的带功死亡后两组患者人/肾1年生存率差异无显著性意义。结论低剂量MMF、CsA和Pred联合应用并不增加急性排斥率、亚临床排斥发生率、排斥治疗逆转率和排斥反应的严重程度,但明显降低肺部感染发生率和病死率。     

Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the efficacy of interleukin-2-receptor blockers in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection in cyclosporine-treated kidney recipients when compared to patients not induced with an antibody product. The addition of daclizumab to a tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive protocol was tested to evaluate whether there might be an additional reduction of the risk of rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: Since March 1998, we studied the effect of daclizumab in a nonrandomized, prospective study of 233 sequential recipients of first renal transplant. They were retrospective compared with a control group of 225 renal transplant recipients receiving a 10-day course of OKT3 induction, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone maintenance. The study group received the same immunosuppressive regimen with the addition of daclizumab at 1 mg/kg for five doses over 10 weeks in the place of OKT3 therapy. There was at least 1HLA DR antigen compatibility match present between all donors and recipients. Patients were followed for 1 year after renal transplantation for the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 12 months, patient and graft survival for the daclizumab was 98 and 96 vs. 96 and 94% for the OKT3 group, respectively, and were not statistically different. Acute rejection rates (<6 months) were lower in the daclizumab group as compared with the OKT3 group, i.e., 5 (2.1%) vs. 16 (7.1%) (P=0.011) respectively. The incidence of infection requiring hospitalization appeared to be lower with daclizumab (7.3 vs. 16%, P<0.0036) with a similar trend with cyclomegalovirus infection, i.e., 1.6 vs. 4%, respectively (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids is safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection and without any increase in morbidity when compared to our previous protocol, which may have an eventual impact in long-term graft survival.     

Steroid Sparing with Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Renal Transplantation

Evidence suggests that steroid sparing in renal transplantation is associated with good outcomes, although there are limited data regarding steroid sparing in Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)-based regimes. In this study we describe the use of these agents in 101 consecutive patients undergoing renal transplantation using only a 7-day course of prednisolone. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 18-44). Patient and graft survival at 1 year were 100% and 98%, respectively. The acute rejection rate at both 6 and 12 months was 19%, with two episodes beyond 12 months. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (anti-CD25 mAb) was administered to 25 patients at high immunological risk: a trend toward a lower rejection rate was seen in these patients compared with those at lower risk but not receiving induction therapy (8% vs. 22%; p = 0.11). Two patients experienced recurrent rejection. Of the twenty-three rejection episodes in total, 26% showed vascular involvement. Allograft function was preserved at 12 months with a mean creatinine of 144 micromol/L and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 55 mL/min. At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 3.5%. This steroid-sparing regime is associated with excellent patient and graft outcomes, and a low incidence of side effects.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Early steroid withdrawal in pediatric renal transplant: five years of follow-up

This prospective, comparative trial investigated the impact on mean change in height standard deviation score (SDS), acute rejection rate, and renal function of early steroid withdrawal in 96 recipients with 5 years of follow-up. Recipients under basiliximab induction and steroid withdrawal (SW: TAC/MMF; n = 55) were compared with a matched steroid control group (SC: TAC/MMF/STEROID, n = 41). SW received steroids until Day 6, SC decreased to 10 mg/m(2) within 2 months post-transplant. Five years after SW, the longitudinal growth (SDS) gain was 1.4 ± 0.4 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3 for SC group (p < 0.02). Height benefits in prepubertal and pubertal status in both groups were demonstrated in the delta growth trends (mixed model; p < 0.01). Biopsy-proven acute rejection in SW was 11% and 17.5%, SC (p: ns). Mean eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at 5 years post-transplant was SW 80.6 ± 27.8 vs. 82.6 ± 25.1 for SC (p: ns). The death-censored graft survival rate at 1 and 5 years was 99 and 90% for SW; 98 and 96% for SC (p = ns). PTLD incidence in SW 3.3 vs. 2.5% in SC (p: ns). Five years post-transplant, early steroid withdrawal showed positive impacts on growth, stable renal function without increased acute rejection risk, and PTLD incidence.     

Pre-Transplant Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Activity is Associated with Clinical Outcome After Renal Transplantation

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity, is usually administered as a standard dose of 1 g b.i.d. after renal transplantation. Because MMF dose reductions are associated with inferior outcome, we investigated pre-transplant IMPDH activity, MMF dose reductions and outcome. IMPDH activity was determined in isolated peripheral mononuclear cells immediately prior to renal transplantation. We observed considerable inter-individual variability in pre-transplant IMPDH activity (9.35 +/- 4.22 nmol/mg/h). Thirty of 48 patients (62.5%) with standard MMF dose (1 g b.i.d.) had dose reductions within 3 years post-transplant; these patients also had significantly lower IMPDH activity. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) for prediction of dose reduction within 6 months post-transplant was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.89; p < 0.004). IMPDH activity above the cut-off value, MMF dose reduction and age of recipient were significant contributors for the occurrence of acute rejection in the multivariate logistic regression. Patients with high IMPDH activity and MMF dose reduction had the highest rejection rate (81.8% vs. 36.4%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with low IMPDH activity experienced more complications of MMF therapy. High pre-transplant IMPDH activity and MMF dose reductions were associated with rejection. Determination of IMPDH activity prior to transplantation may help to improve MMF therapy after renal transplantation.     

Improved results using OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function remains a major problem in cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. We have used 2 different immunosuppressive induction regimens in patients with delayed graft function. The first regimen, used in 40 patients from January 1985 to December 1986, consisted of CsA (8 mg/kg/day, orally within 48 hr of cadaveric renal transplantation regardless of graft function), azathioprine (1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day), and steroids (methylprednisolone 375 mg on day 0, then prednisone tapered to 30 mg/day by day 10 with slow tapering to 7.5-10 mg/day over the first 6 months after transplantation). A second regimen, used from January 1987 to March 1989, employed the same doses of azathioprine and steroids; however, OKT3 (5 mg i.v./day for 7-21 days) was administered in the 34 patients who had delayed graft function. CsA was withheld until ATN resolved. The use of OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in patients with ATN led to a significant increase in 1-year graft survival (80% vs. 55%) while markedly decreasing the incidence of rejection episodes (44% vs. 82%) and the duration of nonfunction (9.4 vs. 14.9 days). There were 5 CMV infections in patients treated with OKT3. Antibodies to OKT3 developed in only 1 of 34 patients treated with OKT3. Five of 7 patients who received a second course of OKT3 successfully reversed the rejection episode. Patient survival (89%) was the same in the 2 groups. The benefit of OKT3 on long-term graft survival appears to stem from elimination of early rejection episodes that may be difficult to diagnose in a poorly functioning allograft. We conclude that OKT3 induction provides superior results over CsA induction at doses given in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function without a significant increase in morbidity or mortality and permits the reuse of OKT3 for treatment of rejection in most cases.     

Mycophenolate mofetil may allow cyclosporine and steroid sparing in de novo heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) provides superior prophylaxis against acute rejection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) in heart and renal transplantation. However, it remains unclear whether this results in improved survival or reduced morbidity after heart transplantation. METHOD: In a sequential study, 240 cardiac transplant patients were treated with either MMF (n=119) or AZA (n=121) both in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids after rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction. RESULTS: By protocol lower cyclosporine levels were targeted in the MMF group during the first year (e.g. 203+/-52 ng/mL MMF vs. 236+/-59 ng/mL AZA, P=0.0006 at 6 months). Patient survival at 1 year (82% MMF vs. 79% AZA, P=0.55) and at 3 years was similar in both groups. The cumulative probability of receiving antirejection treatment within 1 year was lower in the MMF group, as was biopsy-proven acute rejection with International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade > or =3A (24% vs. 35%, P=0.03). The MMF group also had fewer episodes requiring cytolytic therapy (6% vs. 13%, P=0.04) and more patients had steroids withdrawn by 1 year (66% vs. 32%, P<0.001). Renal function was better in the MMF group with lower creatinine levels at 1 year (133+/-45 vs. 155+/-46 micromol/L, P=0.0004). Calculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft and Gault formula) at 1 year was also better (MMF 74+/-32 mL/min vs. AZA 62+/-24 mL/min, P=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that immunosuppression with MMF rather than AZA may allow lower cyclosporine levels, better renal function, and increased steroid weaning at 1 year while also achieving better control of acute rejection.     

Antilymphocyte globulin versus OKT3 induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective randomized study.

Different induction therapies have been used in renal transplantation to avoid cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity and early acute graft rejection. This study compares the efficacy of a short course of prophylactic OKT3 to that of antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) in preventing acute renal allograft rejection when administered concomitantly with CsA and steroids. Between March 1988 and December 1990, 140 first-cadaver renal transplant recipients were randomly allocated to two immunosuppression groups--ALG group (n = 68): ALG 15 mg/kg just before transplant surgery, ALG 12 mg/kg the first day after transplant, followed by four doses of 10 mg/kg on alternate days; and OKT3 group (n = 72): OKT3 5 mg just before transplant, followed by four doses of 5 mg/d. Both groups included low-dose CsA and steroids. The incidence of rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was 15% in the ALG group and 19% in the OKT3 group (NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of patients free of rejection at 2 years was 85% in the ALG group and 77% in the OKT3 group (NS). The 3-year actuarial graft survival was 82% and 85% (NS), and 3-year patient survival was 97% and 98% (NS), in the ALG and OKT3 groups, respectively. These results indicate that the concomitant association of CsA and ALG or OKT3 constitutes a safe and effective therapeutic strategy that provides a low incidence of rejection and gives good results for patient and graft survival.