A randomized trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and home intervention in the care of hospitalized patients

OBJECTIVE: to prove the effectiveness of geriatric evaluation and management for elderly, hospitalized patients, combined with post-discharge home intervention by an interdisciplinary team. DESIGN: randomized controlled trial with outcome and costs assessed for 12 months after the date of admission. SETTING: university-affiliated geriatric hospital and the homes of elderly patients. SUBJECTS: 545 patients with acute illnesses admitted from home to the geriatric hospital. INTERVENTIONS: patients were randomly assigned to receive either comprehensive geriatric assessment and post-discharge home intervention (intervention), comprehensive geriatric assessment alone (assessment) or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: survival, functional status, rehospitalization, nursing home placement and direct costs over 12 months. RESULTS: the intervention group showed a significant reduction in length of hospital stay (33.49 days vs 40.7 days in the assessment group and 42.7 days in the control group; P < 0.05) and rate of immediate nursing home placement (4.4% vs 7.3% and 8.1%; P < 0.05). There was no difference in survival, acute care hospital readmissions or new admissions to nursing homes but the intervention group had significantly shorter hospital readmissions (22.2 days vs 34.2 days and 35.7 days; P < 0.05) and nursing home placements (114.7 days vs 161.6 days and 170.0 days; P < 0.05). Direct costs were lower in the intervention group [about DM 7000 (US $4000) per person per year]. Functional capacities were significantly better in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: comprehensive geriatric assessment in combination with post-discharge home intervention does not improve survival, but does improve functional status and can reduce the length of the initial hospital stay and of subsequent readmissions. It can reduce the rate of immediate nursing home admissions and delay permanent nursing home placement. It may also substantially reduce direct costs of hospitalized patients.     

Causes for in-hospital treatment of nursing home residents

The high rates of hospitalization in nursing home residents are as well known as the hazards of in-hospital treatment especially in this group of frail older people. Moreover, hospital admissions cause considerable costs. The objective of the study was to analyze why nursing home residents are admitted for in-hospital geriatric care, and to form hypotheses of how to prevent these admissions without loss of quality of care. Reason of admission, comorbidity, competence and length of in-hospital stay were assessed in all nursing home residents referred to the Geriatric Centre at the University Hospital of Heidelberg over 12 months. There were 245 admissions of 231 nursing home residents (83.1% female; age 84.2 +/- 7.10 years). Comorbidity was substantial (77% urinary incontinence, 69% dementia, 40% stool incontinence, 22% pressure ulcers), and 56% of residents needed assistance in using the toilet before admission. Mean length of in-hospital stay was 32.6 days (median 29 days). Out of a total amount of 7983 days of in-hospital care, 3627 (45%) were caused by falls and fractures, 2039 (26%) by cardiovascular events (mainly ischemic stroke), 835 (11%) by infections and 495 (6%) by problems concerning nutrition. Most of the leading causes of admission of nursing home residents to in-hospital geriatric care might be affected by improvements in nursing home care. Thus, data suggest that hospitalization rates might be substantially reduced by targeted prevention and therapy as well as by structural measures to improve case management in the nursing homes. Such interventions should be developed and proved in controlled studies.     

Does the mini nutritional assessment predict hospitalization outcomes in older people?

BACKGROUND: the Mini Nutritional Assessment is a validated clinical tool for the assessment of nutritional status in older people. Moderate to severe malnutrition is common in elderly patients in hospital and is associated with a poor outcome. OBJECTIVES: to determine whether the Mini Nutritional Assessment can predict the outcome of hospital stay in older individuals. SETTING: a tertiary-care geriatric hospital. METHODS: we evaluated nutritional status using the Mini Nutritional Assessment in 1319 patients (mean age 84.2, 70% women) admitted between February 1996 and January 1998; 1145 complete assessments were available for analysis. The assessment was carried out on admission and studied in relation to length of stay and in-hospital mortality for all patients, and discharge to a nursing home for those living at home before admission. RESULTS: Mini Nutritional Assessment scores averaged 19.9+/-3.8 (mean+/-SD) with a range of 8.0-27.5, and a median of 20.5. A score below 17, corresponding to malnutrition, was associated with an almost threefold increase in mortality and in the rate of discharge to a nursing home; this contrasted with a score above 24, which indicates satisfactory nutritional status (11.3% vs 3.7%; P<0.01 and 20.3% vs 7.7%; P<0.001, respectively). Length of stay was longer in the low scoring group (42.0 days vs 30.5 days; P<0.0002). CONCLUSION: Poor nutritional status as measured by the Mini Nutritional Assessment was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, a higher rate of discharge to nursing homes and a longer length of stay.     

A short comprehensive assessment to predict outcome of elderly patients after hip fracture

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hip fractures result in significant functional impairment and a high rate of institutionalization. The aim of our study was to evaluate in patients with a recent hip fracture the contribution of a short (15-min) comprehensive assessment to predict the length of stay and the risk of discharge to a nursing home. METHODS: Prospective clinical study conducted in a rehabilitation ward of the Geriatric Hospital. Functional assessment included basic activities of daily living (BADL), cognitive status (MMSE) and a 4-item geriatric depression scale (Mini-GDS). Information on demographic data, living situation, diagnosis and illness burden was also collected. RESULTS: The mean age of the 86 patients (67W/19M) was 84.2 +/- 6.8 years. In a multiple regression analysis, the length of stay in a geriatric hospital was significantly associated with both marital status (living alone) (p = 0.035) and the intervention of a caregiver on a regular basis (p = 0.036), but not with Charlson's comorbidity score. In a logistic regression model, adjusted for age, gender, marital status, intervention of a caregiver on a regular basis, BADL, Mini-GDS and Charlson's comorbidity score, the only independent predictor of nursing home admission was a MMSE < 24, which increased by 10.7-fold (2.2-50.9) the risk of being admitted to a nursing home (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A short comprehensive assessment completed a few days after a hip fracture is useful in predicting length of stay and risk of nursing home admission.     

Treatment of dementia patients with fracture of the proximal femur in a specialized geriatric care unit compared to conventional geriatric care

To prove the efficiency of a specialized geriatric ward (cognitive geriatric unit, CGU) for patients with a fracture of the proximal femur and additional dementia, we conducted a matched-pair analysis comparing 96 patients with fracture of the proximal femur and additional dementia matched for age, sex, surgical treatment and the degree of cognitive impairment by MMSE score. A total of 48 patients were treated in the CGU, offering extended geriatric assessment, special education of staff, and architecture appropriate for patients with cognitive decline. Target criteria were a gain in the Barthel index and Tinetti score, the length of stay, new admissions to nursing home, the frequency of neuroleptic, antidepressant, and antidementive medication, and the number of specified clinical diagnoses for the dementia syndrome. Length of stay was significantly longer in the CGU. The increase of the Tinetti score was significantly higher in the patients in the CGU, regardless of the length of stay (analysis of covariance: treatment (CGU/non-CGU): F(1/93)?=?9.421, p?=?0.003; covariate (length of stay): F(1/93)?=?3.452, p?=?0.066, η(2)?=?3.6%). In the intervention group, the number of definite diagnoses concerning the dementia syndrome was also higher. Comparison of drug treatment and the percentage of new admission to a nursing home did not differ between groups. Treatment in a specialized, "cognitive geriatric unit" seems to result in better mobility of demented patients with proximal fractures of the femur.     

The prevalence of eye disease in nursing home and non-nursing home geriatric populations

The objective of this study was to determine whether rates of eye disease among the elderly are higher for residents of nursing homes than for persons who reside elsewhere. Articles reporting the prevalence of eye disease in geriatric populations (classified as nursing home or non-nursing home) were identified through a Medline search and a search of articles' bibliographies. Identified articles were reviewed, and the relevant data compared with prevalence rates obtained from 738 residents of two nursing homes in New York City. Each of the nursing home residents received an ocular examination upon admission that determined the presence or absence of four varieties of eye disease-i.e. cataracts, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy. Demographic data were obtained through chart review. Results indicate that prevalence rates of eye disease found in geriatric nursing home populations are generally higher than those found in other geriatric populations. With the exception of the rates for diabetic retinopathy, the rates found in the combined nursing home population sampled in this study were much higher than those reported in any previous study. It is concluded that eye disease is a more serious problem for elderly residents of nursing homes than for the elderly who reside in the community. Possible reasons for this are discussed.     

Academic affiliation with a nursing home. Impact on patient outcome

In a prospective study, 46 patients discharged from a teaching hospital to a "teaching unit" nursing home, where primary medical care was provided by faculty geriatricians, medical students, and medical housestaff, were compared with 78 similar patients discharged to one of five community nursing homes without a teaching affiliation. At the time of hospital discharge, patients were determined to have a terminal, rehabilitative, or long stay prognosis based on a review of hospital discharge summaries using specific criteria. Among 34 study and 55 control patients with a long stay prognosis, ten of the study group compared with seven of the control group returned home (P = .03). Seven of 34 long stay patients in the study group were rehospitalized, while 15 of a matched control group of 34 required hospitalization (P = .04). There was no increase in mortality or emergency service use in the study population. Patients considered to be terminal or rehabilitative showed no difference in ultimate outcome or hospital use. In the study group patients experienced an average reduction in total medications prescribed from 6.2 to 5.3, while patients in the control group had an increase from 5.4 medications prescribed to 7.6 (P less than .001). Of 16 study patients discharged from the teaching unit nursing home, all remained home at least three months after discharge; only 12 of 18 control group patients discharged from the nursing home remained at home at three months (P less than .01). Long-term care by geriatric faculty, students, and housestaff appeared to have favorably influenced patient outcomes.     

Geropsychology training in a VA nursing home setting

There is a growing need for professional psychology training in nursing home settings, and nursing homes provide a rich environment for teaching geropsychology competencies. We describe the nursing home training component of our Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Predoctoral Internship and Geropsychology Postdoctoral Fellowship programs. Our training objectives for Interns and Fellows include: increased exposure and interest in nursing home practice; increased competencies in assessment, intervention, and consultation in this setting; and increased confidence in the role of the psychologist in medically oriented, geriatric care settings. We describe the local VA nursing home training setting and our training model, including expected competencies, training activities, special issues in supervision, and evaluation of competencies. We have found group supervision and peer support to be an important component of our nursing home training program. The VA healthcare system allows great flexibility for psychologists to both provide psychological services and training in the nursing home setting.     

Geriatrician input into nursing homes reduces emergency hospital admissions

Nursing home residents are often very dependent, very frail and have complex care needs. Effective partnerships between primary and secondary care will be of benefit to these residents. We looked at 1954 admission episodes to our Trust from April 2006 to March 2009 inclusive. 3 nursing homes had the highest number of multiple admissions (≥ 4). Four strategies to reduce hospital admissions were used at these nursing homes for 3 months. An alert was also sent to the geriatrician if one of the residents was admitted so that their discharge from hospital could be expedited. The project was then extended for another 4 months with 6 nursing homes. The results showed that geriatrician input into nursing homes had a significant impact on admissions from nursing homes (χ(2)(2)=6.261, p < 0.05). The second part of the project also showed significant impact on admissions (χ(2)(2) = 12.552, p < 0.05). Furthermore, in both parts of the project the length of stay in hospital for the residents was reduced. Geriatricians working together with co-ordinated multidisciplinary teams are well placed to manage the care needs of frail, elderly care home residents.     

Screening for frailty: criteria and predictors of outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of rapid screening by clinically derived geriatric criteria in predicting outcomes of elderly hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 985 patients screened at the time of hospital admission and followed for 1 year with respect to the outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, and nursing home utilization. SETTING: Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a tertiary care teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: Male patients 65 years of age and older admitted to the Medical and Surgical services during the period from October 1, 1985 through September 30, 1986. RESULTS: Patients were grouped by specific screening criteria into three groups of increasing frailty: Independent, Frail, and Severely Impaired. Each criterion focused on a geriatric condition and was designed to serve as a marker for frailty. Increasing frailty was significantly correlated with increasing length of hospital stay (P less than 0.0001), nursing home utilization (P less than 0.0001), and mortality (P less than 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the clinical groups were more predictive of mortality and nursing home utilization than were age or Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs). Rehospitalization was unrelated to age, clinical group, or DRG, suggesting that utilization may not be driven by the clinical factors measured in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid clinical screening using specific geriatric criteria is effective in identifying frail older subjects at risk for mortality and nursing home utilization. Our findings suggest that geriatric syndromes are more predictive of adverse outcomes than diagnosis per se. This well operationalized screening process is inexpensive as well as effective and could easily be introduced into other hospital settings.     

Predictors of immediate and 6-month outcomes in hospitalized elderly patients. The importance of functional status

This article presents results of a prospective multivariate study of hospitalized elderly patients at an acute-care Veterans Administration (VA) hospital to identify factors on hospital admission predictive of several short- and long-term outcomes: in-hospital and 6-month mortality, immediate and delayed nursing home admission, length of hospital stay, and 6-month rehospitalization. All patients aged 70 years and over admitted to acute-care beds on the medical service wards during a 1-year period were included in the study (N = 396). Factors most predictive of 6-month mortality (using logistic regression) were decreased functional status, admitting diagnosis, and decreased mental status. Factors most predictive of nursing home admission were decreased functional status, living location, and decreased mental status. Functional status was a stronger predictor of length of stay, mortality, and nursing home placement than was principal admitting diagnosis--of relevance to the current emphasis on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). These data may be helpful in improving discharge planning, in resource allocation, and in targeting patients for different specialized geriatric programs.     

Extended care in nursing homes: a program for a county teaching medical center

A continuity care program for patients in nursing homes using internal medicine residents in training has been developed in a county teaching hospital. Resident physicians on a paid basis assume primary care responsibility for 1000 patients in 29 private community nursing homes. A faculty internist coordinates the activities of the residents and monitors patient care through an extended care office in the county hospital. The program has produced a significant upgrading of the continuity and quality of care of patients in these nursing homes as well as providing medical residents with geriatric and nursing home experience. The increased sensitivity and concern for the needs of nursing home patients developed by the medical residents seems to continue after they complete their training.     

Standards of medical care for nursing home residents in Europe

ObjectiveNursing home inhabitants represent the most vulnerable and frail group of older people. They have more complex medical backgrounds and more significant care requirements. With an ever-ageing European population, the number of people requiring nursing home care will only increase. It is important then that we optimise the medical care of older people living in nursing homes.MethodsFormalized care standards are essential to optimal care but we feel that such guidelines are lacking. We decided to investigate this by means of a survey on nursing home care standards sent to the geriatric medicine societies around Europe.ResultsOnly five of 25 (20%) health services have a requirement for specific training in geriatric medicine for doctors in nursing homes, while only three of 25 (12%) countries have written medical care standards applicable to nursing home care provided by professional organizations. Four of 25 (16%) had a nursing home doctor society and one of these, The Netherlands, provided written medical care standards for nursing homes which were also adopted by the relevant general practitioner society.DiscussionThe Europe-wide deficiency of documented care standards for nursing homes is alarming. It should be a prerequisite that physicians dealing with these complex patients have undertaken some level of specific training in geriatric medicine. It is important that geriatricians, old age psychiatrists and family doctors across European countries engage more formally on the development of appropriate models for both developing care standards and specifying appropriate training and support for doctors working in nursing homes.     

Kurzzeitpflege nach Krankenhausaufenthalt: Einflussfaktoren auf die Entlassung in die eigene Häuslichkeit

A special short-term care (KZP) in a nursing home is offered to patients who are not yet able to live independently after hospitalization. It was institutionalized in 1989. But its basic conditions changed in 1996 with the new Pflegeversicherungsgesetz (nursing insurance law): the maximal stay was limited to 4 weeks and cost were turned over to the new insurance system.The paper analyzes the part KZP plays in health care maintenance. It addresses the questions which kind of patients is referred to KZP and what factors influence discharge at home vs admission to end-term nursing homes.A total of 325 patient's records (female: 80.3%) from 5 KZP institutions in the city of Bremen were analyzed (nearly 50% of all clients, who were formerly hospitalized). Patient's mean age was 82.9 years. Hospitalization lasted three weeks with men staying 27.6 days and women staying 20.1 days. Nervous disorders (especially apoplexy) and cardiovascular diseases are very common. After the stay in KZP, 39.1% moved to nursing homes, 36.0% returned home. Predictors for nursing home admission are long-lasting hospitalization, predicted need of long-term care by physicians, and nervous disorders. The results show that short-term care is a useful concept in health care maintenance of patients with special diseases und complicates re-convalescence.     

Health Outcomes and Geriatric Assessment: Making Literature Reviews Relevant to Current Programs

The rationale for geriatric assessment programs includes a reduction in nursing home admissions, improved health outcomes and improved physical function. However the evidence for these benefits may not be directly transferable to all models of geriatric assessment programs. This study is a review of published studies of most relevance to aged care assessment teams with regard to one important outcome, nursing home admission. However the conclusions are limited in that no studies are directly comparable to the situation in which aged care assessment teams function. In addition, traditional outcome measures may not be appropriate in considering the effectiveness of similar models of geriatric assessment.     

The yield,reliability, and validity of a postal survey for screening community-dwelling older people

OBJECTIVES: To assess the yield, reliability, and validity of a postal survey developed to identify older persons in need of outpatient geriatric assessment and follow-up services. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient primary care clinic at a Department of Veterans Affairs teaching ambulatory care center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N = 2,382) aged 65 and older who returned a Geriatric Postal Screening Survey (GPSS) that screened for common geriatric conditions (depression, cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, falls, and functional status impairment). Validity and reliability testing was performed with subsamples of patients classified as high or lower risk based on responses to the GPSS. MEASUREMENTS: Test-retest reliability was measured by percentage agreement and kappa statistic. The diagnostic validity of the 10-item GPSS was tested by comparing single GPSS items to standardized geriatric assessment instruments for depression, mental status and functional status, as well as direct questions regarding falls, urinary incontinence, and use of medications. Validity was also tested against clinician evaluation of the specific geriatric conditions. Predictive validity was tested by comparing GPSS score with 1-year follow-up data on functional status, survival, and healthcare use. RESULTS: Respondents identified as high risk by the GPSS had scores that indicated significantly greater impairment on structured assessment instruments than those identified as lower risk by GPSS. The overall mean percentage agreement between the test and retest surveys was 88.3%, with a mean weighted kappa of 0.70. In comparison with a structured telephone interview and with a clinical assessment, individual items of the GPSS showed good accuracy (range 0.71-0.78) for identifying symptoms of depression, falls, and urinary incontinence. Over a 1-year follow-up period, the GPSS-identified high-risk group had significantly (P <.05) more hospital admissions, hospital days and nursing home admissions than the lower-risk group. CONCLUSION: A brief postal screening survey can successfully target patients for geriatric assessment services. In screening for symptoms of common geriatric conditions, the GPSS identified a subgroup of older outpatients with multiple geriatric syndromes who were at increased risk for hospital use and nursing home admission and who could potentially benefit from geriatric intervention.     

Home from home: residents' opinions of nursing homes and long-stay wards

OBJECTIVE: To compare the levels of satisfaction expressed by residents of nursing homes with those of patients in geriatric long-stay wards. DESIGN: A structured satisfaction questionnaire containing 37 closed and two open questions was used to elicit responses from residents of nursing homes in the former South West Thames Regional Health Authority area. This was compared with a similar survey using the same questionnaire among patients in geriatric long-stay wards surveyed in 1989. SETTING: respondents came from a sample of nursing homes chosen to be representative of both size and geographical location. Nursing homes were stratified by number of beds (1-19, 20-29, 30+) and clustered by location (to reflect the urban, semi-rural and coastal nature of the region). SUBJECTS: A random sample was drawn from each grouping (size and location) to yield a resident sample of 850 in 36 nursing homes. This figure was similar to the number of patients (808) in geriatric long-staywards surveyed in 1989. All eligible nursing home patients were assessed for physical dependency. Mental confusion was ascertained by the Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS). Patients who scored three or less on the AMTS (indicative of severe confusion) or had dysphasia, profound deafness or concurrent serious illness were excluded from further study. RESULTS: 377 nursing home residents were able to complete the questionnaire and their answers were compared with those of 291 long-stay geriatric patients. The responses to the five themes--relations with staff, autonomy, amenities, privacy and social environment-show some minor differences between the two groups but what is more noticeable is the similarity of their views. This is important as much social policy assumes that the more 'homely' atmosphere of the nursing home should elicit higher levels of satisfaction than the 'institutional' setting of the hospital ward. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the difference between nursing homes and hospital wards in terms of their institutionalizing capacities is not as profound as policy-makers believe.     

The demand for homes in old age

A study is reported of the utilization of non-clinical institutional care (geriatric and old people's homes) by the elderly inhabitants of Mannheim (pop. 306,000). The aim of the research was to establish the probability of admission to institutional care of an elderly person from this population, and to examine the influence of socio-demographic features. Under the West German health insurance system, most of the long-stay care of the elderly is provided not in hospitals but in nursing and geriatric homes. Data were collected on age at admission, place of residence before admission, duration of stay, age at death and place of death, as well as on the financial basis of care. The data were gathered retrospectively, the sample consisting of all inhabitants of Mannheim over 65 years old who died in the year 1982 (N = 2,585). At any given time only about four per cent of the elderly population will be in institutional care. In this respect, Mannheim is typical for the Federal Republic of Germany. However, the research findings demonstrate that approximately one elderly person in five will spend the last period of his life in this type of care. Seen in this light, the geriatric and old people's homes acquire a much greater social significance than is revealed by the number of institutional places alone.     

New issues in geriatric care

The rapid growth of the elderly population has increased the need for improved geriatric care and prevention of disability. For example, the prevalence and severity of osteoporosis can be reduced significantly by the use of estrogen, with or without added progestin, in postmenopausal women. A common and devastating problem of frail elderly persons is urinary incontinence, most cases of which can be classified without referral for urologic services. Appropriate treatment can improve nearly half of all cases of persistent incontinence. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is effective in guiding the treatment of frail elderly patients and leads to significantly improved outcomes under appropriate conditions. The advent of the teaching nursing home has shed light on the medical problems of elderly residents of nursing homes, including malnutrition, dysregulation of water and electrolyte balance, falling, cognitive and affective illnesses, behavior disturbances, infections, and pathogenic drug use. The future application of advanced technology may revolutionize nursing home care.     

Presentation and Management Outcomes of Corneal and Scleral Perforations in Geriatric Nursing Home Residents

We compared the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of corneal and scleral perforations in geriatric nursing home residents, geriatric community residents, and non-geriatric population. The medical records of patients who were treated for corneal and scleral perforations at the Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong between January 1, 2004 and May 1, 2013, were reviewed retrospectively. Of 144 cases, 53 (37%) occurred in the geriatric population, of which 16 (11%) lived in nursing homes, and 37 (26%) were community residents. There were 91 (63%) patients in the non-geriatric group. The mean age of the patients in nursing home geriatric group was 86.5 years (87.5% females). The most common etiology of perforation was trauma. Rupture due to fall was more common in geriatric patients (P < 0.001) whereas laceration due to penetrating eye injury was more common in non-geriatric patients (P < 0.001). There were more cases of infection leading to spontaneous perforation in geriatric nursing home group compared to the other groups (P = 0.001). In the geriatric nursing home group, visual acuity at presentation (P < 0.001) and postoperative visual acuity (P = 0.012) was worse compared to the other groups. Our study showed that corneal and scleral perforations in the geriatric nursing home residents carry a poor visual prognosis. The causes and anatomical outcomes of such events in geriatric age group differ from those in the general population. In our study, geriatric patients residing in nursing homes had worse baseline as well as posttreatment visual acuity, compared to community residents.