A phase I study of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic solid tumors

Introduction: This was a dose escalation phase I trial designed to establish the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).Methods: Standard eligibility criteria were required for patients with advanced malignancy to enrol. Gemcitabine was escalated from an initial dose of 800 mg/m². Gemcitabine was administered prior to leucovorin (25 mg/m²) followed by bolus 5-FU (600 mg/m²) every week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest.Results: Of 21 patients enrolled, 20 were eligible for MTD determination. Patients received a median of three 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (range: 1 to 8 cycles). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic or gastroenterologic. Four dose levels were studied. At a gemcitabine dose of 1,500 mg/m² systemic symptoms of fatigue accompanied hematologic toxicity and patients refused further therapy. At 1,250 mg/m², full dose intensity was not delivered during the first cycle in 7 of 8 patients treated. Therefore, 1,000 mg/m² was established as the recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine in this study. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels.Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-FU was tolerable at full doses of all 3 drugs with an expected toxicity profile. Recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m². Initial evidence of clinical activity was seen in a variety of tumor types.     

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouacil through dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial of eniluracil and 5-fluorouracil in advanced resistant colorectal cancer

Purpose. To investigate thehypothesis that a systemic agent designedto inhibit dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase(DPD), the first enzyme in thefluoropyrimidine degradative pathway, couldimprove the effective amount of5-fluorouracil (5-FU) delivered to a tumorresulting in enhanced response. Patients and methods. Eligibility includedcytologically or pathologically verifieddiagnosis of colorectal cancer thatrecurred during or within 12 months ofcompletion of adjuvant therapy,representing patients generally consideredresistant to fluorinated pyrimidinetherapy. Stratification was into twocohorts: recurrence while receivingadjuvant therapy, and relapse within 12months of completing adjuvant therapy.Treatment consisted of 28 days of oraltherapy every five weeks with eniluraciland 5-FU administered in a 10:1 ratio. Thedaily dose of eniluracil was 10 mg/m²with 5-FU 1 mg/m², divided into twodoses. Results. Twenty-five patientsare evaluable for response: 9 relapsedduring therapy and 16 relapsed within oneyear of adjuvant therapy. In the firstgroup, there was one partial response (9%;95% CI 0–41%); in the second cohort therewas one confirmed complete response (5%;95% CI 0–23%) and one unconfirmed partialresponse, for an overall response rate of10%. Conclusions. This regimen lackssignificant activity in this targetpopulation. Pre-treatment intratumoral DPDexpression was not assessed, therefore themechanism of fluorinated pyrimidineresistance cannot be specificallyattributed to elevated DPD levels.Attempting restoration of chemotherapysensitivity through blockade of enzymes orsignal transduction molecules responsiblefor resistance is rational, provided thattumor target expression is the basis fortrial entry.     

Tirofiban: an investigational plateletglycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist

Introduction: Fluoropyrimidines with oxaliplatin or irinotecan plus bevacizumab is the standard chemotherapy combination in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Gemcitabine acts synergistically with fluoropyrimidines to enhance the binding of thymidylate synthase and increase inhibition of DNA synthesis. The objective of this review is to evaluate the literature for evidence of efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus gemcitabine (FG) in patients with advanced CRC. Methods: Relevant studies were identified in PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane database and the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts using the following search terms: gemcitabine, fluorouracil, capecitabine and colorectal cancer. Only studies using the FG combination were selected. Results: Forty-two advanced CRC patients were evaluated in two Phase I studies and the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine was 900 – 1,000 mg/m² weekly with either bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine. A total of 216 advanced CRC patients were evaluated in six Phase II studies. Gemcitabine (750 – 1,250 mg/m²) with either 5-FU (continuous infusion or bolus) or capecitabine was administered as first-line therapy in two studies and as third-line therapy in three studies. The range reported for overall response rate was 30 – 38.3%, median time to progression was 4 – 8.3+ months and median survival was 9.8 – 18+ months. The most commonly reported grade 3 – 4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and mucositis. Conclusions: Fluoropyrimidine plus gemcitabine is clinically active in patients with refractory CRC demonstrating prolonged median time to progression and acceptable toxicity only when bolus 5-FU was not used. Studies are underway to evaluate the combinations of FG with other chemotherapy or targeted agents. Meanwhile, FG may be considered for patients with advanced CRC who are refractory to primary treatment without other options or who are not eligible for clinical studies.     

Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors: A phase-I-study

Summary Background: Gemcitabine is a pro-drug that has to be phosphorylated to gemcitabine-triphosphate in order to exhibit its antineoplastic activity. This reaction involves the enzyme deoxycytidine kinase which is saturated at plasma concentrations following standard 30-min infusions. Pharmacological studies indicate that prolonged administration of gemcitabine might result in higher intracellular concentrations of active metabolites. This phase I trial was therefore initiated to determine the optimal dose of gemcitabine administered over 4h in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with gemcitabine as 4h-infusion on day 1, 8 and 15 in 4 week intervals. The starting dose was 350 mg/m². Doses were escalated in 50 mg/m² increments.Results: Twenty-one patients were treated at doses ranging from 350 to 450 mg/m². The maximum tolerated dose was 400 mg/m² with neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis and elevation of liver enzymes being dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). Hematologic and nonhematological toxicities were generally mild to moderate. Most common side effects were myelosuppression, nausea, elevation of liver enzymes and asthenia. Objective responses were noted in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangio-carcinoma.Conclusion: In this phase I study of gemcitabine as 4h-infusion, DLTs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis and elevation of liver enzymes. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 400 mg/m².     

Pilot study of irinotecan/oxalipltin (IROX) combination chemotherapy for patients with gemcitabine- and 5-fluorouracil- refractory pancreatic cancer

Background Gemcitabine- and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- based chemotherapy is a commonly used adjuvant or palliative treatment for patients with pancreatic cancer. However, a standard chemotherapy regimen has yet to be developed for patients refractory to gemcitabine and 5-FU treatment. We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX) as a salvage treatment for patients with gemcitabine- and 5-FU- refractory pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were refractory to prior gemcitabine- and 5-FU- based chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. IROX chemotherapy was administered as follows: Irinotecan, 150 mg/m² on day 1; and oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m² on day 1 over 90 min every 2 weeks. Result From Mar. 2006 to Dec. 2008, a total of 14 patients were administered 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The male-to-female ratio of the patient group was 11:3. These patients ranged in age from 48 to 73 years (median 65.5 years old). 3 patients (21.4%) evidenced partial responses. four patients (28.6%) exhibited stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2–1.6) months and 4.1 (95% CI: 2.0–6.2) months, respectively. Major hematologic toxicities included grade 1–2 anemia (88%), neutropenia (36%), thrombocytopenia (30%), and grade 3–4 neutropenia (10%). The most frequently detected non-hematological toxicities were grade 3 diarrheas (14%). Conclusion The IROX regimen appears to constitute a feasible and tolerable salvage therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have been previously treated with gemcitabine- and 5-FU-based chemotherapy.     

A phase I study of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic solid tumors

INTRODUCTION: This was a dose escalation phase I trial designed to establish the MTD (maximum tolerated dose) and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). METHODS: Standard eligibility criteria were required for patients with advanced malignancy to enroll. Gemcitabine was escalated from an initial dose of 800 mg/m2. Gemcitabine was administered prior to leucovorin (25 mg/m2) followed by bolus 5-FU (600 mg/m2) every week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week of rest. RESULTS: Of 21 patients enrolled, 20 were eligible for MTD determination. Patients received a median of three 4-week cycles of chemotherapy (range: 1 to 8 cycles). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic or gastroenterologic. Four dose levels were studied. At a gemcitabine dose of 1,500 mg/m2 systemic symptoms of fatigue accompanied hematologic toxicity and patients refused further therapy. At 1,250 mg/m2, full dose intensity was not delivered during the first cycle in 7 of 8 patients treated. Therefore, 1,000 mg/m2 was established as the recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine in this study. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine, leucovorin and 5-FU was tolerable at full doses of all 3 drugs with an expected toxicity profile. Recommended phase II dose for gemcitabine was 1,000 mg/m2. Initial evidence of clinical activity was seen in a variety of tumor types.     

Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone in metastatic breast cancer: A phase-I-study

Background: Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone are active agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Due to different modes of action and a favorable toxicity profile they are suitable for combination therapy. This phase I trial was initiated to determine the optimal doses for the combination in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the regimen. Patients and methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine (1000–1400 mg/m²) on days 1, 8 and 15 and mitoxantrone (10–14 mg/m²) on day 8. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles. Doses were assigned at registration according to the escalation scheme. Results: Twenty-six patients received a total of 93 cycles at 5 different dose levels. The maximum tolerated doses were 1200 mg/m² gemcitabine and 14 mg/m² mitoxantrone with grade 4 neutropenia being the dose limiting toxicity. Recommended phase II doses, however, are gemcitabine 1200 mg/m² and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m² based on a similar median dose intensity and a more favorable toxicity profile. Predominant toxicity was myelosuppression. Most common non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, alopecia and elevation of liver enzymes. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response. Four patients achieved a partial response accounting for an overall response rate of 19%. In addition, 12 patients (57%) had stable disease and 5 patients (24%) failed to response to the treatment. Median duration of response and duration of clinical benefit were 14 and 9 months, respectively. Conclusion: In this phase I study of gemcitabine and mitoxantrone, the DLT was neutropenia. Recommended phase II doses are gemcitabine 1200 mg/m² and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m².     

Phase I/II trial of dipyridamole, 5-fluorouracil,leukovorin, and mitoxantrone in metastatic breast cancer

Summary Based upon the hypothesis that dipyridamole would potentiate the cytotoxicity of mitoxantrone and the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leukovorin, we performed a phase I/II trial of the combination of dipyridamole, 5-FU, leukovorin, and mitoxantrone in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The dose of dipyridamole was fixed at 175 mg/m² by mouth every 6 h (700 mg/m²/day), based upon a previous phase I trial of oral dipyridamole with 5-FU and leukovorin. Dipyridamole therapy began 24 h prior to the first dose of chemotherapy and continued until 24 h after the last dose of chemotherapy for each course of treatment. At the initial dose level, leukovorin 200 mg/m² was given intravenously immediately prior to 5-FU 375 mg/ m² intravenously on days 1–5. Mitoxantrone 6 mg/m² was given as a single dose on day 3. Unacceptable toxicity was observed at this dose level, leading to successive dose decrements rather than dose increments. The maximum tolerated dose was leukovorin 200 mg/m² days 1–2, 5-FU 375 mg/m² days 1–2, mitoxantrone 6 mg/m² on day 2, and dipyridamole 175 mg/m² every 6 h on days 0–3. Two responses were produced in 15 patients. This regimen is not recommended for further investigation in the treatment of breast cancer.     

Pharmacology of Fluorinated Pyrimidines: Eniluracil

The pharmacological inactivation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)represents one strategy to improve 5-FU therapy, which historically hasbeen associated with unpredictable pharmacological behavior andtoxicity. This is principally due to high interpatientdifferences in the activity of DPD, the enzyme that mediates theinitial and rate-limiting step in 5-FU catabolism. Byinactivating DPD and suppressing the catabolism of 5-FU,eniluracil has dramatically altered the pharmacological profileof 5-FU. The maximum tolerated dose of oral 5-FU given with oraleniluracil (1.0 to 25 mg/m²) is substantially lower thanconventional 5-FU doses. In the presence of eniluracil,bioavailability of 5-FU has increased to approximately 100%, thehalf-life is prolonged to 4 to 6 hours, and systemic clearanceis reduced > 20-fold to values comparable the glomerularfiltration rate (46 to 58 mL/min/m²). Renal excretion( 45% to 75%), instead of DPD-related catabolism, is theprincipal route of elimination of oral 5-FU given witheniluracil. Chronic daily administration of oral 5-FU 1.0mg/m² twice daily with eniluracil 20 mg twice dailyproduces 5-FU steady-state concentrations (8–38 ng/mL) similarto those achieved with protracted intravenous administration onclinically relevant dose-schedules. On a daily × 5regimen, higher 5-FU AUC values are related to neutropenia,whereas elevated 5-FU AUC and steady-state concentrations arerelated to diarrhea when oral 5-FU is given daily with eniluracilon a chronic schedule. The pharmacokinetic behavior of oraleniluracil is similar to that for oral 5-FU. Administration ofeniluracil 10 to 20 mg twice daily completely inactivates DPDactivity both in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and incolorectal tumor tissue, and prolonged inhibition of DPD afterdiscontinuation of eniluracil treatment has been noted. In thepresence of eniluracil, oral administration of 5-FU is feasibleand variation in 5-FU exposure is reduced, with the anticipationof further reduction in variation as dosing guidelines based onrenal function are formulated.     

A phase I study of topotecan and gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors

Purpose Gemcitabine and topotecan are commonly used anti-tumor agents with a wide spectrum of activity in vitro and in vivo. A phase I trial of a combination of these two agents was initiated based on the premise that both gemcitabine and topotecan cause DNA damage and interfere with DNA repair by different mechanisms. Synergism has been demonstrated in vitro when gemcitabine and other topoisomerase I inhibitors have been combined. Patients and Methods Seventeen patients with advanced solid tumors signed consent and were treated on this study with at least one cycle. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine at doses of 400 to 625 mg/m² days 1 and 5 in combination with topotecan at doses of 0.8 to 1 mg/m² given on days 2 through 5 every 21 days. Results The dose limiting toxicities of granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were reached at the highest dose level of gemcitabine 625 mg/m² and topotecan 1 mg/m². A diffuse skin rash was also seen in four treated patients and responded well to treatment with steroids. One partial response and seven stable disease were seen as best response in 16 evaluable patients. Conclusion The combination of gemcitabine and topotecan was found to be tolerable with interesting preliminary activity. The recommended phase II dose for this combination is gemcitabine at 500 mg/m² on days 1 and 5 with topotecan at 0.8 mg/m² on days 2 to 5.     

Leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil,and gemcitabine: A phase I study

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent with efficacy in the treatment of lung, pancreas, bladder and breast cancer. It inhibits DNA synthesis by interfering with cytidine triphosphate production and also inhibits the activity of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine may potentiate fluorouracil's inhibition of thymidylate synthase. This inhibition would be expected to be sequence dependent, occurring only if gemcitabine were administered following fluorouracil (5FU).The combination of leucovorin, 5-FU, and gemcitabine was assessed in this phase I trial. Eligibility requirements included refractory solid tumor malignancy; adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic reserve; no prior therapy with the combination of leucovorin and 5FU, or with gemcitabine; ECOG performance status 0–2, and signed informed consent.Eleven men and nine women were eligible. The median age was 52.5 years and the median performance status was 1. All but three patients had prior chemotherapy. The starting doses were leucovorin 20 mg/m², 5FU 255 mg/m² and gemcitabine 600 mg/m². 5FU and gemcitabine were escalated in tandem to 340 mg/m² and 800 mg/m² and thereafter to 425 mg/m² and 1000 mg/m², respectively. Gemcitabine administration always followed that of 5FU by 30 minutes. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1–32). Two patients at the starting dose had disease progression within the first cycle with one death on day 28. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a partial response and remained on study for 40 months. There were no other responses.The maximum tolerated dose is leucovorin 20 mg/m², 5FU 340 mg/m², and gemcitabine 800 mg/m². The impact of drug sequence remains undetermined.     

A phase I trial of CEP-701 + gemcitabine in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas

Summary Introduction: Current standard therapy for advanced pancreas cancer includes the use of gemcitabine or a gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimen. Based on pre-clinical data, the combination of CEP-701, an inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including Flt-3, TRK-A/B and JCK-2, with gemcitabine appeared promising. Methods: Two clinical sites were chosen for this phase I trial, one scheduled to start gemcitabine prior to CEP-701 and one scheduled to start CEP-701 prior to gemcitabine. Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 1,000 mg/m² over 30 min each week for 3 weeks in a row followed by 1 week off. CEP 701 was taken orally twice daily at doses ranging from 20 mg bid to 40 mg bid. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were determined to assess for any drug–drug interactions. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled and 17 received at least one dose of study drug. Nine patients experienced serious adverse events, but only one patient’s toxicity was attributed as possibly secondary to study drug. No radiologic responses were seen. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed between gemcitabine and CEP 701. The combination was well-tolerated, and the MTD was not reached in this study. Conclusions: No unexpected toxicities were seen for this combination. Although too few patients were enrolled to fully evaluate efficacy, there was not significant evidence for pursuing this combination further in pancreas cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was not determined secondary to the early termination of the study.     

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 every 21 days for solid tumors: Result of a dose-intensity study

Summary Background: Three and 4-week cisplatin-gemcitabine schedules have shown similar dose-intensity (DI) and activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 3-week schedule is generally preferred because it enables better treatment compliance. To improve DI and compliance further, we delivered gemcitabine plus cisplatin over 4 days every 21 days. Methods: Patients with any stage NSCLC or epithelial neoplasms and an ECOG PS ≤2 were given gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin 70 mg/m² on day 2 of a 21-day cycle. Minimax design was used and a received DI for gemcitabine of ≥580 mg/m²/wk was considered successful. Results: Thirty-nine patients (34 NSCLC, 5 epithelial neoplasias) were enrolled. SWOG grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 17.9% and 12.8% of patients, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity was minimal. Twenty-eight (18%) of 158 cycles required dose modifications and/or delays. Twenty-five patients received a gemcitabine dose intensity of ≥580 mg/m²/wk. The received DIs were 601.8 mg/m²/wk for gemcitabine and 21.0 for cisplatin, with a relative DIs of 90.3% and 90.1%, respectively. The response rate of 27 evaluable patients with NSCLC was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.3 to 62.7%). Conclusions: The shorter schedule of gemcitabine on days 1 and 4 plus cisplatin on day 2 produces an effective DI and a toxicity profile comparable to that of weekly regimens.     

A Phase II study of celecoxib,gemcitabine, and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer

Summary Background. Pancreatic cancer is amongst the most chemoresistant malignancies. Expression of the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme plays a major role in tumor progression and resistance to therapy. A Phase II study was undertaken to determine the effect of gemcitabine by fixed-dose rate infusion (FDR), cisplatin and the COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, on the 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods. The eligibility criteria included a pathologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. No prior gemcitabine therapy was allowed. Patients received a combination of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² over 100 minutes, cisplatin 35 mg/m² I.V. on days 1 and 8, and celecoxib continuously at a daily dose of 800 mg. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Results. Twenty-two patients with metastatic pancreas cancer were enrolled (median age, 59.5 years; M:F, 13:9). The median number of cycles was 2 per patient. The median survival time was 5.8 months (90% CI, 3.6–7.6 months). The probability of survival at 6 months was 46% (90% CI, 27–62%). The major toxicity was neutropenia with grade 3 or 4 toxicities seen in 65% of patients. Conclusions. The addition of celecoxib to gemcitabine (by FDR) and cisplatin did not appear to increase activity of the chemotherapy doublet in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Celecoxib alone may not be sufficient to sensitize pancreatic cancer to the effects of conventional cytotoxic therapy.     

Phase I study of 17-allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin,gemcitabine and/or cisplatin in patients with refractory solid tumors

Purpose: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of 17-AAG, gemcitabine and/or cisplatin. Levels of the proteins Hsp90, Hsp70 and ILK were measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PMBC) lysates to assess the effects of 17-AAG. Experimental design: Phase I dose-escalating trial using a “3 + 3” design performed in patients with advanced solid tumors. Once the MTD of gemcitabine + 17-AAG + cisplatin was determined, dose escalation of 17-AAG with constant doses of gemcitabine and cisplatin was attempted. After significant hematologic toxicity occurred, the protocol was amended to evaluate three cohorts: gemcitabine and 17-AAG; 17-AAG and cisplatin; and gemcitabine, 17-AAG and cisplatin with modified dosing. Results: The 39 patients enrolled were evaluable for toxicity and response. The MTD for cohort A was 154 mg/m² of 17-AAG, 750 mg/m² of gemcitabine, and 40 mg/m² of cisplatin. In cohort A, DLTs were observed at the higher dose level and included neutropenia, hyperbilirubinemia, dehydration, GGT elevation, hyponatremia, nausea, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia. The MTD for cohort C was 154 mg/m² of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m² of gemcitabine, with one DLT observed (alkaline phosphatase elevation) observed. In cohort C, DLTs of thrombocytopenia, fever and dyspnea were seen at the higher dose level. The remaining cohorts were closed to accrual due to toxicity. Six patients experienced partial responses. Mean Hsp90 levels were decreased and levels of Hsp70 were increased compared to baseline. Conclusions: 17-AAG in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin demonstrated antitumor activity, but significant hematologic toxicities were encountered. 17-AAG combined with gemcitabine is tolerable and has demonstrated evidence of activity at the MTD. The recommended phase II dose is defined as 154 mg/m² of 17-AAG and 750 mg/m² of gemcitabine, and is currently being investigated in phase II studies in ovarian and pancreatic cancers. There is no recommended phase II dose for the cisplatin-containing combinations.     

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer

Background: Because gemcitabine andvinorelbine have demonstrated single-agentactivity in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), we conducted this phase I/II studyto determine the maximum tolerated dose(MTD) and activity of these drugs combined. Patients and methods: Patients withinoperable or advanced NSCLC and no priorchemotherapy were treated with gemcitabineplus vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 every 21days. The initial doses of gemcitabine1,000 mg/m² and vinorelbine25 mg/m² were escalated by250 mg/m² and 5 mg/m²,respectively, in separate patient cohortsuntil the MTD was established. Results: In phase I, 32 patientsreceived a total of 115 cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropeniaand hepatotoxicity, occurring at the doselevel of 1,500 mg/m² and30 mg/m². Thus, the MTD used forphase II was 1,250 mg/m² and30 mg/m². Of 41 patients in phase II,16 (39%) achieved objective responses(95% confidence interval [CI] 24% to54%), with a median time to progression of4.2 months. Overall survival was 9 months(95% CI 5.7 to 12.7 months) and the 1-yearsurvival rate was 31%. World HealthOrganization (WHO) grade 3neutropenia and reversible thrombocytosisoccurred in 15% and 65% of patients,respectively. Non-hematologic toxicity wasmild at all dose levels. Grades 3 and 4hepatotoxicity were reported in one patienteach. Conclusion: The combination of1,250 mg/m² gemcitabine and30 mg/m² vinorelbine on days 1 and 8every 21 days is well tolerated and activein patients with NSCLC. These resultsshould be confirmed in comparativestudies.     

Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Summary   Purpose: This phase I trial assessed the safety and the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine given for 10 days prior to a combination of cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. It also evaluated the changes in cisplatin DNA adducts induced by capecitabine. Patients and Methods: Patients with refractory solid tumors who had not failed 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) analogs or topoisomerase I inhibitors were eligible. All cohorts of patients first received a 28-day cycle of cisplatin and irinotecan. Both drugs were given at a dose of 50 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, followed by irinotecan on days 8 and 15 at the same dose. The first cycle served as an internal control. Starting from the second cycle, patients received increasing doses per cohort of capecitabine from day 1 to 10 of each cycle, followed by cisplatin on day 11 and irinotecan on days 11, 18 and 25, both at same doses as the first cycle. Cycles were repeated every 38 days. The starting dose of capecitabine was 500 mg/m²/day which was escalated by 250 mg/m²/day in the subsequent cohort of patients to reach the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Later, additional patients were treated at the MTD of capecitabine to further evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and tumor response. Patients blood was tested for cisplatin-DNA adducts to determine the impact of capecitabine on cisplatin-based therapy. Results: Fifteen patients received at least 2 cycles of treatment. At 1,250 mg/m², two DLT of prolonged neutropenia of grade ≥3 were observed. The MTD for capecitabine was thus determined to be 1000 mg/m²/day. Fatigue and diarrhea of grade 1 or 2 were the most frequent toxicities at this dose level. No significant hematologic toxicity was observed at the MTD. Two complete and three partial remissions were observed. Four of the responders had received a platinum agent and/or 5-FU in the past. Conclusions: A sequential treatment with capecitabine followed by cisplatin and irinotecan is well tolerated and demonstrates clinical activity in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The influence of capecitabine, if any, on the efficacy of the cisplatin-irinotecan combination is not related to a variation in cisplatin-DNA adducts. Previous presentations: C. F. Verschraegen, F. C. Lee, I. Rabinowitz, A. Mangalik, C. Jennings, A. Maestas, Z. Shen. Phase I and translational study of capecitabine, cisplatin, and irinotecan in patients with solid tumors. Proc ASCO, A2114, 2004 H. Sayar, C. Verschraegen, H. Smith, I. Rabinowitz, F. C. Lee, Z. Shen. Phase I study of capecitabine in combination with cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Proc ASCO, AB-31962, 2008 Support: Supported by the Oxnard Foundation; Period of Support: 07/01/2003–06/30/2005     

A Phase II Trial of Etoposide, Leucovorin, 5-FU, and Interferon Alpha 2b (ELFI) + G-CSF for Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study (SWOG 9413)

Background. Chemotherapeutic treatments using combinationsof etoposide, leucovorin and 5-FU (ELF) have shown activity inthe treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Interferon alpha2b is known to have antiproliferative effects on several celllines and has well documented in vitro evidence ofsynergism with 5-FU. It was postulated that the combination ofELF and interferon alpha 2b would improve response rates andsurvival in patients with pancreas cancer. Methods. Fifty-five eligible patients with locally-advancedor metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received a regimenconsisting of: IV leucovorin at 300 mg/m²/day on Days 1-3(of 28-day cycle), IV etoposide at 80 mg/m²/day on Days 1-3, IV 5-FU at 500 mg/m²/day on Days 1-3, subcutaneousinterferon alpha 2b at 3 million units TIW, and subcutaneousG-CSF at 5 g/kg/day on Days 4-14 (or until WBC exceeds10,000/l). Patients with no evidence of disease progressioncontinued on treatment for a total of 6 cycles. Results. Complete response was demonstrated in 1 patient,partial response in 5 patients (11% confirmed response rate).The median survival was 5 months, and the six-month survival ratewas 40%. Ten patients completed all 6 cycles of treatment.Toxicity-related dose delays and reductions were necessary formost patients. Conclusions. Although the combination of ELF and interferonalpha 2b (ELFI) has modest activity in pancreatic cancer, it isa toxic and complex regimen that is not superior to othercurrently available approaches for the chemotherapeuticmanagement of pancreatic cancer. ELFI cannot be recommended asa standard therapy.     

Phase I trial of 5-fluorouracil by 24-hour infusion weekly

A novel schedule of 5-fluorouracil administration has been developed for biochemical modulation studies. In combination with the pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor PALA, 5-fluorouracil has been given as a 24-hour infusion, repeated weekly: a dose of 2600 mg/m² is well tolerated. To identify a suitable dose of 5-fluorouracil as a single agent on this schedule, we treated 26 patients at doses ranging from 2800 to 3400 mg/m² per week. Two-thirds of the patients had failed previous therapy, and most were symptomatic from their disease. Over half of the patients had metastatic colorectal cancer. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred at every level tested. Twenty-two of the 26 patients required therapy interruption because of toxicity. The severity of this toxicity indicated that escalation of 5-fluorouracil on this schedule beyond the 2600 mg/m² known to be tolerated in the PALA-containing regimen, would be impractical. Two patients, both with previously untreated colorectal cancer, had partial remissions lasting three and five months respectively. This dose-intense schedule of 5-fluorouracil administration will be explored further in large-scale randomized trials.     

Phase I trial of oblimersen (Genasense®) and gemcitabine in refractory and advanced malignancies

Background: Overexpression of Bcl-2 is associated with worse prognosis for a number of cancer types. The present study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oblimersen (antisense Bcl-2) and gemcitabine when administered to patients with refractory malignancies. Materials and methods: Sixteen patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies were treated with escalating doses of oblimersen continuous, 120-h intravenous infusion given every 14 days, with a fixed-dose-rate intravenous infusion of gemcitabine administered on day 5 of each cycle. Serial plasma samples were collected to calculate the pharmacokinetics of oblimersen and gemcitabine, and also to measure the effect of oblimersen on Bcl-2 expression. Results: 7 women and 9 men, median age 55 years (range 35–74 years), received a 5-day infusion of oblimersen at dose levels of 5 mg/kg/day (n = 4) or 7 mg/kg/day (n = 12). On the 5th day of the infusion, gemcitabine was given at 10 mg/m²/h for a total dose of 1,000 mg/m² (n = 7; cohorts I and II), 1,200 mg/m² (n = 3; cohort III), or 1,500 mg/m² (n = 6; cohort IV). Edema was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), necessitating expansion of cohort IV. No subsequent DLTs were noted. Thus, the maximum planned doses were well tolerated, and a formal MTD was not determined. Most hematologic toxicities were grade 1 or 2. There was low-grade fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and myalgias/arthralgias. Oblimersen C_ss and AUC increased in relation to the dose escalation, but gemcitabine triphosphate levels did not correlate well with dose. There were no objective responses, though 5 patients had stable disease. A >75% reduction in Bcl-2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear leucocytes was seen more frequently in patients who achieved stable disease than in progressing patients. Conclusions: The maximal planned dose levels of oblimersen and gemcitabine in combination were well tolerated. Only one DLT (edema) occurred. There was a correlation between Bcl-2 reduction and stable disease. The recommended doses of the drugs for future studies are 7 mg/kg/day of oblimersen on days 1–5, and gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m² on day 5, every two weeks.