Sildenafil versus the vacuum erection device: patient preference

PURPOSE: We evaluated the preference of patients with erectile dysfunction who had been effectively treated with a vacuum erection device and then switched to sildenafil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 52 patients with erectile dysfunction who achieved satisfactory erectile function according to the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) while using a vacuum erection device were switched to an increasing dose of sildenafil (range 25 to 100 mg.) until satisfactory erection was maintained at least twice a week for at least 1 month. The 2 treatment methods were not used concomitantly. A total of 36 patients with a mean age of 59 years (range 35 to 77) who claimed to have achieved satisfactory erections with a vacuum erection device and sildenafil reported their preference to continue sildenafil or resume the use of a vacuum erection device, reasons for the choice and any adverse side effects. RESULTS: Of the 36 participants in whom the efficacy of sildenafil was similar to that of a vacuum erection device according to the IIEF scores (mean plus or minus standard deviation 61.6 +/- 10.4 and 62.5 +/- 6, respectively), 12 (33.3%) decided to resume use of a vacuum erection device (group 1) while 24 (66.6%) preferred to continue sildenafil (group 2). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding patient age or the etiology and duration of erectile dysfunction. The increase in the IIEF score while using a vacuum erection device was higher in group 1 than 2, with a mean of 66.75 versus 60.4, respectively (p = 0.002). The adverse side effects of sildenafil were the main reasons for preferring a vacuum erection device. Fewer ejaculatory difficulties, efficacy, comfort and ease of use were the main reasons for choosing sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Even in an era of effective oral medication, the vacuum erection device remains a preferred treatment option for a substantial number of patients with erectile dysfunction.     

Regaining of morning erection and sexual confidence in patients with erectile dysfunction

Aim:To investigate how erectile dysfunction(ED)medications affect morning erection in patients with ED and howthey respond to the return of morning erection.Methods:This study was conducted in 120 patients who experi-enced successful intercourse with either tadalafil or sildenafil.Using a random face-to-face interview and a question-naire(about the quality and number of days getting morning erection after using the two medications),the impact ofthe medications on the morning erections was investigated,and the participants were asked about their feelings onregaining morning erection.Results:Of the respondents,81%(68% of those with sildenafil and 99% of those withtadalafil)experienced morning erections after taking an oral ED medication.The men who took tadalafil mainly for2 days with one dose,while those who took sildenafil experienced morning erections mainly for 1 day.The majorsentiment upon regaining a morning erection was,"having more confidence as a man"(74%).Among the 96 respon-dents who experienced morning erections with tadalafil,52% preferred tadalafil over sildenafil,not only because offreedom from concerns about a specific time to have relations,but also regaining morning erection.Conclusion:Regaining a morning erection affects the recovery of confidence as a man and influences the preference for tadalafilover sildenafil.(Asian J Andro12006 Nov;8:703-708)     

Efficacy of oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of sildenafil for patients with erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Fifty patients with erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy were treated with sildenafil. Their median age was 68 years (range 54 to 78). All were treated with a three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy approach, and the median dose prescribed to the planning target volume was 75.6 Gy. Patients were initially given 50 mg of sildenafil and instructed to use the medication on at least three occasions. They were then contacted to ascertain the efficacy of and tolerance to the medication. RESULTS: Significant improvement in the firmness of the erection after sildenafil was reported in 37 patients (74%), 2 (4%) had partial improvement, and 11 (22%) had no response. Significant improvement in the durability of the erection was reported in 33 patients (66%), 3 (6%) had partial improvement, and 14 (28%) reported no improvement. Patients with partial or moderate erectile function before using sildenafil were more likely to benefit from the medication compared with those with absent function. Among 29 patients with erections classified as partial after radiotherapy, 26 (90%) had a significant response to the medication. In contrast, only 11 (52%) of 21 with erections classified as flaccid after radiotherapy had a significant response to the medication (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil improved erectile function in greater than two thirds of patients with postradiotherapy impotence. Patients with less severe dysfunction are most likely to benefit from this intervention.     

The utility of sildenafil citrate for infertile men with sexual dysfunction: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use the sildenafil citrate, recognized as a first-line therapy for men with erectile dysfunction (ED), and which is safe and effective in men with various causes and severity of ED, including psychogenic ED, in a population of infertile men with sexual dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infertility is a major source of life stress and might be associated with sexual dysfunction through the erosion of self-esteem and self-confidence, and in stimulating discord in a relationship. Men presenting for evaluation of fertility who on questioning by the physician reported the recent onset of sexual dysfunction, had a history taken, a physical examination, hormonal profile, and completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), a validated inventory for assessing sexual dysfunction. Thirty men with a score of <26 on the erectile function domain of the IIEF, or who complained of new onset rapid or delayed ejaculation, were treated with sildenafil with no randomization or placebo control. The evaluation was repeated and the IIEF completed again > or =3 months after starting treatment. RESULTS: For men complaining of ED, subjective erectile rigidity, duration of erection, and the percentage of successful penetration attempts significantly improved with sildenafil. The mean (sd) IIEF domain scores for erection and satisfaction, at 18 (4) vs 27 (3), and 12 (2) vs 16 (3) (both P = 0.01), and orgasm, at 4 (1) vs 6 (3) (P = 0.001), respectively, significantly improved after treatment. In patients with ejaculatory dysfunction, the function improved in 64% after sildenafil therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We identified the nature of sexual dysfunction associated with male-factor infertility, and showed the efficacy of sildenafil therapy in men with this condition.     

Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction of various etiologies

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose oral sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) of various etiologies. METHODS: In a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study, 514 men (mean age 56 years) with ED were randomized to receive 25, 50, or 100 mg of sildenafil or placebo. The primary etiology of ED was determined to be organic in 32% of men, psychogenic in 25%, or mixed in 43%. Sildenafil or placebo was taken in the home setting approximately 1 hour before sexual activity, not more than once daily. Efficacy was determined by responses to question 3 (ability to achieve an erection) and question 4 (ability to maintain an erection) of the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Other measures of efficacy included the five sexual function domains of the IIEF, a global efficacy question, event log data, and a partner questionnaire. RESULTS: Sildenafil significantly increased patients' ability to achieve and maintain erections (P <0.0001), with efficacy increasing with increasing dose. Significant improvements were also observed in the IIEF domains for erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall sexual satisfaction (P <0.0001). The proportion of subjects who felt that treatment with sildenafil improved their erections was significantly greater (67% to 86%) than that with placebo treatment (24%, P <0.0001). The proportion of successful attempts at sexual intercourse also increased significantly with sildenafil treatment (P <0.001). Partner responses corroborated patient reports. Sildenafil was well tolerated at the three doses studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oral sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for ED of various etiologies.     

Male erectile dysfunction following spinal cord injury: a systematic review

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To review sexuality in persons with spinal cord injuries (SCIs), and to report the effectiveness of erectile interventions. METHODS: Reports from six databases (1966-2003), selected annual proceedings (1997-2002) and manufacturer's information were screened against eligibility criteria. Included reports were abstracted and data pooled from case-series reports regarding intracavernous injections and sildenafil. RESULTS: From 2127 unique reports evaluated, 49 were included. Male sexual dysfunction was addressed in these reports of several interventions (behavioural therapy, topical agents, intraurethral alprosatadil, intracavernous injections, vacuum tumescence devices, penile implants, sacral stimulators and oral medication). Penile injections resulted in successful erectile function in 90% (95% CI: 83%, 97%) of men. Sildenafil resulted in 79% (95% CI: 68%, 90%) success; the difference in efficacy was not statistically significant. Five case-series reports involving 363 participants with penile implants demonstrated a high satisfaction rate, but a 10% complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: A large body of evidence addressing sexuality in males focuses on erection. Penile injection, sildenafil and vacuum devices generally obviate the need for penile implants to address erectile dysfunction. Interventions may positively affect sexual activity in the short term. Long-term sexual adjustment and holistic approaches beyond erections remain to be studied. Rigorous study design and reporting, using common outcome measures, will facilitate higher quality research. This will positively impact patient care. SPONSORSHIP: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.     

Improvement in emotional well-being and relationships of users of sildenafil

PURPOSE: We estimated the association of sildenafil use with erectile function, relationship with sexual partner, functional status and emotional well-being in men with erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Letters were mailed to eligible patients at a university hospital urology and internal medicine clinic, and university affiliated community primary care clinics by the primary care provider or urologist inviting them to participate in the study. Of the eligible sample 124 men (53%) completed and returned a survey, including 85 who reported current sildenafil use. Change scores in these patients were calculated using the International Index of Erectile Function, marital interaction scale from the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Short Form, 5-item emotional well-being scale of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Sildenafil users reported an 88% increase in erectile function scores, 60% increase in overall sexual satisfaction and 36% increase in intercourse satisfaction related to the use of sildenafil (p <0.001). Of the respondents 38% indicated that using sildenafil had definitely improved quality of life. Likewise 29% of respondents indicated that using sildenafil had definitely improved the relationship with their partner. With sildenafil there was a statistically significant improvement in the scores of erectile and sexual function (p <0.001), sexual partner relationship (p = 0.007) and emotional well-being (p <0.001). In a multivariate model improved erectile function and sexual partner relationship were each significantly associated with improved emotional well-being (R2 = 0.20, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil users reported significant improvements in erectile and sexual function that were associated with positive changes in emotional well-being and the sexual partner relationships with their sexual partner.     

Efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction of newly-weds

To explore the efficacy of sildenafil on erectile dysfunction (ED) of newly-weds, the author studied 60 outpatients within a month of marriage, who suffered from sexual intercourse (SI) failure caused by ED and showed no improvement after receiving sex education and psychological consultation. The patients were given oral sildenafil, 100 mg for the first and second times, 50 mg for the third and fourth times, no more than once every day, with a 1- to 3-day break between every two times. Four times of sildenafil administration formed one course of treatment. Sildenafil was taken 1 h before SI and was aided with adequate sexual stimulation. The rates of successful SI due to improved erection during and after a course of sildenafil treatment were 93.3% (56/60) and 85% (51/60), both P  > 0.05. In the groups with one and more than one SI failure the successful SI rates after a sildenafil treatment course were 93.1% (27/29) and 77.4% (24/31), both P  > 0.05. Oral sildenafil with psychological therapy in the treatment of ED of newly-weds proves to be effective in restoring the patients' sexual function and relieving their mental pressure or stress.     

Rehabilitation of the cavernous smooth muscle in patients with organic erectile dysfunction

This study aimed at assessing the effect of regular use of intracorporeal injection (ICI), sildenafil citrate and vacuum constriction device (VCD) on cavernous smooth muscle and erectile activity. One hundred and sixty-five patients with organic erectile dysfunction were investigated for 3 months. The patient and his partner were classified prospectively after proper counselling: group I (n = 56) received ICI twice per week; group II (n = 55) received sildenafil 100 mg twice per week; and group III (n = 54) used VCD twice per week. Duplex ultrasound was carried out before and after treatment, and then, the patients were followed up for a month to assess the resumption of unaided erection. The results showed that there was significant improvement in mean peak systolic velocity (PSV) and mean cavernosal artery diameter (CAD) at the end of the treatment in all groups, being higher in the ICI group than in the other two groups. Also, the percentage of patients who resumed unaided intercourse were higher in the ICI group compared with the other two groups (17.9%, 9.1% and 3.7% respectively). It is concluded that repeated regular use of ICI, sildenafil or VCD by patients with organic erectile dysfunction has a positive impact on their cavernous blood flow and erectile activity.     

A dose-escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate in men with erectile dysfunction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra, Pfizer Inc., USA) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study over a period of 26 weeks in men with erectile dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 315 patients from five countries were randomized to receive treatment with placebo (156 men) or sildenafil (159 men). Significant concomitant medical conditions were hypertension (20%), a history of pelvic surgery (19%), diabetes mellitus (15%), and ischaemic heart disease (10%). Patients randomized to treatment received a starting dose of 25 mg of sildenafil or matching placebo, which could be increased to 50 mg and then to 100 mg of sildenafil, based on efficacy and tolerability. Assessments of efficacy comprised the 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), including question three (ability to achieve an erection) and question four (ability to maintain an erection), a partner questionnaire, an overall efficacy question, and event-log data. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 26%, 32% and 42% of patients were taking 25, 50 and 100 mg of sildenafil, respectively. A similar distribution of doses was reported after 26 weeks of treatment. Treatment with sildenafil significantly improved the patients' abilities to achieve and maintain an erection compared with treatment with placebo (P < 0.001). Scores for four of the five sexual function domains of the IIEF (erectile function, orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction and overall satisfaction) also improved significantly (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in the mean score for the erectile function domain, regardless of the aetiology of erectile dysfunction (P < 0.001). After 12 weeks and 26 weeks of treatment, 82% and 79% of patients receiving sildenafil reported improved erections, compared with 24% and 23% of patients receiving placebo, respectively (P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate and occurred in 27% of patients receiving sildenafil, compared with 8% of patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for men with erectile dysfunction of a broad spectrum of aetiology.     

全面康复:勃起功能障碍治疗的新目标

5型磷酸二酯酶(PDE5)抑制剂有效改善勃起功能障碍(ED)患者的勃起功能。枸橼酸西地那非的应用范围不断扩展,肺动脉高压已成为新的适应证。临床研究发现,西地那非能改善多种血管性疾病患者的内皮功能。在ED领域的研究进展包括:动物实验发现,西地那非可以改善海绵体内皮功能,增强磷酸化内皮型一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)蛋白表达,逆转缺血或缺氧导致的海绵体内压(ICP)降低。临床研究证实,西地那非可以使50%以上ED患者阴茎勃起恢复到最充分的硬度(4级勃起);使50%以上保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术后患者勃起功能康复,自发产生足以性交的勃起;使ED患者的自尊心、自信心和性关系满意度等社会心理功能恢复正常。从勃起功能到社会心理功能的全面恢复可能成为今后ED治疗的新目标。     

Sildenafil in the treatment of sexual dysfunction in spinal cord-injured male patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in spinal cord-injury (SCI) patients. Moreover, we looked for neurological conditions permitting therapeutic success and for the ideal dose needed to achieve sufficient erections. METHODS: 41 SCI patients were prospectively examined. Sexual dysfunction was assessed by means of anamnesis, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, and neurological examination. Psychogenic erection capacity was tested by audiovisual stimulation and reflexive erection using a vibrator device. Neurophysiological recordings and cystomanometry were performed in parallel to clinical examinations. Neurophysiological recordings included sympathetic skin responses (SSR), pudendus somatosensory evoked potentials (pSSEP), and bulbocavernous reflex (BCR). Urodynamics aimed at classifying the neurogenic bladder dysfunction (upper motoneuron lesion versus lower motoneuron lesion). Intracavernous injection tests with PGE1 were performed in all patients to exclude major organic disease. 50 mg sildenafil was first given 3 times. Thereafter, the doses were adapted according to patients' reports. RESULTS: Clinically, 28 subjects preserved either reflexive erections (24) or psychogenic erections (4), 11 had both types and only 2 presented with a complete loss of erection. 38 patients (93%) had a positive response to sildenafil and reached a penile rigidity sufficient to permit sexual intercourse. 3 patients dropped out because of non-response despite having increased the dosis up to 100 mg. 22 patients (58%) showed functional erections 1 h after 50 mg sildenafil, whereas 14 (37%) required higher doses of 75-100 mg. By comparing the IIEF questionnaire scores before and after therapy, there was a significant improvement in erectile function and intercourse satisfaction from 9.2+/-4.4 SD) and 4.5 (+/-2.5 SD) to 25.5 (+/-4.2 SD) and 10.5 (+/-2.1 SD) points, respectively (p<0.05). Nearly 10% (4/41) suffered from side effects such as headache or dizziness. Two of them stopped therapy because of the side effects. At least 36 patients (88%) continue treatment with sildenafil. Absence of both psychogenic (nonsomesthetic supraspinally elicited) and reflexive (somesthetic spinally elicited) erections, confirmed by urodynamical and electrophysiological findings (SSR perineum, BCR and pSSEP), seems to exclude a successful treatment. In contrast, SCI male patients with preserved function of at least one component of the erection phenomenon (psychogenic/reflexive) responded well to sildenafil and the dose required to achieve erections sufficient for sexual intercourse did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil proves to be a valuable and safe therapeutic management in ED of SCI patients. Therefore, patient acceptance and satisfaction are high. The most common dose required to achieve a satisfying erection is 50 mg. The efficacy of sildenafil depends on sparing of either sacral (S2-S4) or thoracolumbar (T10-L2) spinal segments which, in this study, have been shown to be of relevance in mediating psychogenic erections in male SCI patients. Complete disturbance of any neurogenic impulses excludes successful treatment.     

Efficacy, safety and predictive factors of therapeutic success with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction in patients with different spinal cord injuries.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, open, prospective, before-after study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil therapy for erectile dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, and the association between the response to sildenafil and factors such as causes and levels of spinal cord injury, grade of ASIA deficit, time since injury, orgasmic perception, and degree of baseline erection. SETTING: Homes of outpatients of 16 spinal cord injury units in Spain. METHOD: One hundred and seventy patients with erectile dysfunction secondary to spinal cord injury, from whom baseline data were collected on their sexual function, and who started treatment with sildenafil 50 mg. An efficacy assessment was made by the patient and his partner, and the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) was recorded. RESULTS: It was reported by 88.2% of the patients and 85.3% of their partners that treatment with sildenafil had improved their erections, regardless of the baseline characteristics of the spinal cord injury and erectile function. In responders, this improvement was confirmed by an increase from 12.5 to 24.8 points (P<0.001) of the Erectile Function Domain of IIEF. A significant improvement was also seen in patients' satisfaction with sexual activity and general satisfaction derived from sexual life. Preservation of orgasmic perception and a baseline degree of erection of 3 or 4 (P=0.006) were predictors of therapeutic success. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction caused by spinal cord injury, regardless of the cause, neurological level, ASIA grade, and time since injury. SPONSORSHIP: Spanish Society of Paraplegia.     

Correlations between increased erection hardness and improvements in emotional well-being and satisfaction outcomes in men treated with sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction

To explore relationships between erection hardness and other outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). Pooled analyses were conducted on 27 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and six open-label trials from the worldwide sildenafil database. Outcomes included erection hardness graded subjectively, hardness and sexual satisfaction questions from the International Index of Erectile Function, general and sexually-specific emotional well-being from the self-esteem and relationship questionnaire, and the erectile dysfunction inventory of treatment satisfaction. Hardness outcomes improved (with a possible dose-response relationship for the achievement of fully hard and rigid erections) and correlated positively with the other outcomes. Sildenafil 100 mg produced optimal erection hardness (fully hard and rigid erections) in a substantial proportion of men with ED. Because optimal erection hardness correlated positively with some emotional well-being and satisfaction outcomes, sildenafil 100 mg may be the most appropriate dosage for treatment of ED for most men.     

Treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy with sildenafil citrate (Viagra)

Objectives. To determine whether the response to the new oral medication, sildenafil citrate (Viagra), was influenced by the presence or absence of the neurovascular bundles, as recent reports on its success did not specify the efficacy of the drug in patients with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.Methods. Baseline and follow-up data from 28 healthy patients presenting with erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy were obtained. Patients receiving any neoadjuvant/adjuvant hormones or adjuvant radiation therapy were excluded. Patients reported what their erectile status was before surgery, before sildenafil therapy, and after using a minimum of four doses of sildenafil. Both the patients and their spouses were interviewed using the Cleveland Clinic post-prostatectomy questionnaire, which includes questions about response to therapy, duration of intercourse, spousal satisfaction, side effects, and related topics. The patients were compared on the basis of the type of surgical procedure they had undergone—nerve sparing or non-nerve sparing. A positive response to sildenafil was defined as erection sufficient for vaginal penetration.Results. Of the 15 patients who had bilateral nerve-sparing procedures, 12 (80%) had a positive response to sildenafil, with a mean duration of 6.92 minutes of vaginal intercourse. These 12 patients also reported a spousal satisfaction rate of 80%. All 12 of the responders had a positive response within the first three doses, and 10 of the 12 responded with the first or second dose. None of the 3 patients who had undergone a unilateral nerve-sparing procedure responded, nor did any of the 10 patients who had undergone a non-nerve-sparing procedure. The two most common side effects of the drug were transient headaches (39%) and abnormal color vision (11%). No patients discontinued the medication because of side effects.Conclusions. Successful treatment of erectile dysfunction in a patient after prostatectomy with sildenafil citrate may depend on the presence of bilateral neurovascular bundles. No patient who had undergone a non-nerve-sparing procedure responded. Whether patients who undergo unilateral nerve-sparing procedures will respond to sildenafil is still unclear because of the small number of patients in our study. These findings should encourage urologists to continue to perform and perfect the nerve-sparing approach. The ability to restore potency with an oral medication after radical prostatectomy will impact our discussion with the patient on the surgical morbidity of radical prostatectomy.     

Evaluation and therapeutic regulation of erectile dysfunction with visual stimulation test. An objective approach by using sildenafil citrate test

AIM: An objective evaluation of the psychogenic cause of erectile dysfunction by performing the visual stimulation tumescence and rigidity (VSTR) test and sildenafil citrate test, together with the effectiveness of sildenafil citrate medication on impotence caused by different etiologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2000, a total of 36 men (12 patients with diabetic etiology, 5 patients with vasculogenic risk factor) were enrolled in this study. The mean age of patients was 53 (27-67) years. Following standard questionnaires, including a detailed anamnesis from an andrologic viewpoint, VST was performed in an ambulatory setting and beginning with a test dose of 50 mg. At the end of 2 h, the data was evaluated with computer assistance (Rigiscan device) and if a satisfactory erection had not occurred, an additional second dose of sildenafil citrate (50 mg) was given until there was a satisfactory erection. Results obtained from VST: results were classified as group I (fully rigidity, >10 min erection, >70% of rigidity, possible vaginal penetration), group II (unstable erection, 5 min erection, >70% of rigidity, possible vaginal penetration) and group III (tumescence without rigidity, <5 min erection, <70% of rigidity, impossible vaginal penetration). The results obtained during the first 1 h of the VSTR test were regarded as the patient's own erectile condition and later data was accepted as the real effect of sildenafil citrate. The Fisher exact test was used for statistical evaluation including pre- and post-sildenafil effect on erectile rigidity and duration of erection. RESULTS: The erection status of patients was sufficient in 17 (47.2%) in group I, it was insufficient but sufficient enough with an increased dose of sildenafil citrate in 10 (27.7%) in group II, and insufficient without/with full dose of sildenafil citrate in 9 (25%) in group III. Considering rigidity and total erectile period, there was a statistical significant difference between the first two groups with respect to the early and late sildenafil citrate effects on the VSTR test (p < 0.05). Again, 10 patients with known risk factors (diabetes mellitus 5 and vasculogenic 5) in the second group seemed to give a good response to repeated dosage of sildenafil citrate which has been found to be very interesting. However, the rest of the diabetic patients (n = 7) in the third group showed no erection despite the increasing and repeated doses of sildenafil citrate. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil citrate with the VSTR test has effective and reliable results which was regarded as very important to diagnose and determine objectively the amount of therapeutic doses in impotence. In accordance with the literature data, our results also confirm the reliability and the practical nature of the VSTR test, which is less time-consuming and cheaper than the nocturnal penile tumescence and rigidity (NPTR) test. In the VSTR test, necessary doses of medication needed for satisfactory erection were easily regulated in patients with certain kinds of impotence. Additionally, self-criticism advantage of the patients on erection and an unnecessary need for regular sexual partners may make this test preferable in the near future. However, we believe that a large group of patients with other definite parameters are certainly needed in order to obtain more reliable data.     

An open-label,multicenter, randomized,crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in Chinese men na?ve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy

The study was to compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in Chinese men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapies. This multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated whether Chinese men with ED preferred 20-mg tadalafil or 100-mg sildenafil. After a 4 weeks baseline assessment, 383 eligible patients were randomized to sequential 20-mg tadalafil per 100-mg sildenafil or vice versa for 8 weeks respectively and then chose which treatment they preferred to take during the 8 weeks extension. Primary efficacy was measured by Question 1 of the PDE5 Inhibitor Treatment Preference Questionnaire (PITPQ). Secondary efficacy was analyzed by PITPQ Question 2, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) erectile function (EF) domain, sexual encounter profile (SEP) Questions 2 and 3, and the Drug Attributes Questionnaire. Three hundred and fifty men (91%) completed the randomized treatment phase. Two hundred and forty-two per 350 (69.1%) patients preferred 20-mg tadalafil, and 108/350 (30.9%) preferred 100-mg sildenafil (P < 0.001) as their treatment in the 8 weeks extension. Ninety-two per 242 (38%) patients strongly preferred tadalafil and 37/108 (34.3%) strongly the preferred sildenafil. The SEP2 (penetration), SEP3 (successful intercourse), and IIEF-EF domain scores were improved in both tadalafil and sildenafil treatment groups. For patients who preferred tadalafil, getting an erection long after taking the medication was the most reported reason for tadalafil preference. The only treatment-emergent adverse event reported by > 2% of men was headache. After tadalafil and sildenafil treatments, more Chinese men with ED naïve to PDE5 inhibitor preferred tadalafil. Both sildenafil and tadalafil treatments were effective and safe.     

Yohimbine enhances the effect of sildenafil on erectile process in rats

Combining the centrally acting drug yohimbine with the peripheral conditioner sildenafil might be an approach to erectile dysfunction cases in which sildenafil alone failed. This work aimed to investigate the effect of yohimbine on sildenafil-induced facilitation of erectile process. Erectile responses to electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve in anesthetized male rats were recorded. Intracavernosal pressure/systemic arterial pressure (ICP/SAP) was calculated, 1 and 5 min after intravenous administration of sildenafil, yohimbine or a combination of both. Changes in sexual arousal and copulatory performance indices were compared before and after these injections using behavioral mating experiments. It was shown that systemic administration of sildenafil produced a significant increase in ICP/SAP than control at doses >or=10 micromol kg(-1). Yohimbine alone failed to potentiate erectile responses but yohimbine (1 micromol kg(-1)) significantly potentiated the effect of sildenafil 1-10 micromol kg(-1) and 1 mmol kg(-1), 1 and 5 min after injection. Potentiation of ICP/SAP induced by their combination was greater than the sum of the effects of the corresponding doses of either drug at the same time interval. A nonsignificant additional decrease in SAP than sildenafil-induced was observed if administered with yohimbine. Addition of sildenafil to yohimbine significantly enhanced the effect of the latter on intromission frequency, intercopulatory interval and the number of ejaculations per session. It is concluded that yohimbine may enhance and prolong the effect of sildenafil on erectile process without additional hypotension. Sildenafil may enhance the central effects of yohimbine on erection; it amplifies the effect of yohimbine on male copulatory performance but not on sexual motivation. The potential beneficial effect of the combination was found to be more pronounced on the central component than on the peripheral component of the erectile process.     

A NEW METHOD FOR THE EVALUATION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION: SILDENAFIL PLUS DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY

PURPOSE: Of the various methods of hemodynamic studies performed to evaluate erectile dysfunction penile color Doppler ultrasound is currently considered the best. However, intracavernous injection is invasive and has adverse effects, such as prolonged erection. We evaluated whether sildenafil may be used as a substitute for intracavernous agents when assessing impotence on color Doppler ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients with erectile dysfunction underwent color Doppler ultrasound before and after intracavernous injection of 60 mg. papaverine with genital and audiovisual sexual stimulation. Peak flow and end diastolic velocity were measured in the recorded waveforms obtained 0, 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after injection. The patients also underwent color Doppler ultrasound after a 50 mg. oral dose of sildenafil with genital and audiovisual sexual stimulation not before 3 days after the papaverine study. The same parameters were measured at 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes, and compared with the values obtained after papaverine injection. RESULTS: Mean peak flow velocity significantly increased after oral sildenafil starting at 30 minutes and achieving a maximum value at 60 minutes. There were no significant differences in the 2 methods in mean peak velocity 1, 5, 10 and 20 minutes after papaverine injection, and 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes after oral sildenafil administration. Penile color Doppler ultrasound with intracavernous papaverine injection is accepted as the gold standard but color Doppler ultrasound with sildenafil has 90% sensitivity and 100% selectivity for demonstrating arterial insufficiency. Due to prolonged erection 5 patients (11.9%) in the papaverine group required pharmacological detumescence by intracavernous injection. No adverse effects of sildenafil were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil administration achieved increased peak flow velocity comparable to that after intracavernous papaverine injection. With no prolonged erection sildenafil emerges as a safer alternative compared to more invasive intracavernous injection.