Quality of life in long-term survivors after liver transplantation: impact of recurrent viral hepatitis C virus hepatitis

Post liver transplant recurrence of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in approximately 50% of patients transplanted because of HCV-related liver disease. The aim of this study was to assess long-term quality of life, psychologic distress, and coping in patients with recurrent HCV after liver transplantation in comparison to patients transplanted for other etiologies of underlying liver disease. All liver transplant recipients transplanted at a University affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center who had greater than 6 months follow-up were sent a questionnaire investigating quality of life (assessed by Medical Outcomes study health survey SF-36), depression (assessed by Beck Depression Inventory), total mood disturbance (assessed by Profile of Mood States scale), coping (assessed by Billing and Moos Inventory of coping with illnesses), and employment status. Lower Beck Depression Inventory score (p = 0.001), lower mood disturbance score (p = 0.0001), overall satisfaction with present work (p = 0.0001), and lesser use of avoidant coping (p = 0.06) were predictors of better quality of life in long-term survivors of liver transplantation. At a mean follow-up of 4 yr after liver transplantation, patients with histopathologically diagnosed recurrent viral HCV hepatitis had significantly lower global quality of life score (mean score of 76.4 versus 86.2, p = 0.011) and physical functioning score (mean score 20 versus 25, p = 0.015), as compared to all other patients. In summary, quality of life and physical functioning were significantly impaired in liver transplant recipients with histopathologically diagnosed recurrent HCV hepatitis, as compared to those whose HCV hepatitis had not recurred or those transplanted for other reasons.     

Interactions Between Cytomegalovirus, Human Herpesvirus-6, and the Recurrence of Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation

Recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) following liver transplantation is common. Herpesvirus reactivation following transplant may have an immunomodulatory effect resulting in increased HCV replication. We studied whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) may be associated with HCV recurrence and viral load after transplant. We prospectively followed 66 HCV liver-transplant recipients with serial viral load testing for CMV and HHV-6. Infection and viral load were correlated with the development of biopsy-proven HCV recurrence and HCV viral loads. Histologic recurrence of HCV occurred in 41/66 (62.1%) patients. In the primary analysis, CMV infection and disease, and HHV-6 infection were not associated with HCV recurrence. Peak CMV and HHV-6 viral loads were not significantly different in patients with and without recurrence. No correlation was observed between HCV viral loads at 1 and 3 months post-transplant and peak HHV-6 or CMV viral loads. In a subgroup analysis, HHV-6 infection was associated with the development of more severe recurrence (hepatitis and/or fibrosis score > or = 2) (p = 0.01). Also, fibrosis scores at last follow up were higher in patients with CMV disease (1.67 vs. 0.56; p = 0.016) and in patients with HHV-6 infection (1.18 vs. 0.55; p = 0.031). In conclusion, HHV-6 and CMV infection and viral load were not associated with increased overall rates of HCV recurrence or HCV viral load after liver transplantation but may be associated with more severe forms of recurrence.     

Impact of human herpesvirus-6 on the frequency and severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus hepatitis in liver transplant recipients

A role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) In the immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been proposed. The novel herpes virus, human herpes virus-6 (HHV-6), is amongst the most potent inducers of cytokines, including TNF-alpha. The impact of HHV-6 viremia on the progression of recurrent HCV hepatitis was assessed in 51 HCV-positive liver transplant recipients. The frequency of recurrent HCV hepatitis did not differ between patients with HCV viremia (47.6%, 10/21) as compared with those without HCV viremia (46.7%, 14/30, p = 0.9). However, the patients with HHV-6 viremia had a significantly higher fibrosis score upon HCV recurrence than those without HHV-6 viremia (mean 1.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.01). An association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and HCV recurrence was not documented; 50% (15/30) of the patients with CMV viremia and 42.8% (9/21) of those without CMV viremia had recurrent HCV hepatitis (p > 0.5). Receipt of ganciclovir (administered upon the detection of CMV viremia) was associated with lower total Knodell score (mean 5.2 vs. 6.9, p = 0.05) and a trend towards lower fibrosis score (mean 0.44 vs. 1.00, p = 0.12) in patients with recurrent HCV hepatitis. Thus, HHV-6 viremia in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients identified a subgroup of patients at increased risk for early fibrosis upon HCV recurrence.     

Results of live donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatitic C virus infection: the HCV 3 trial experience

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common disease indication for liver transplantation (LT). Outcomes are compromised by near universal recurrence of HCV. A prospective multi-center randomized study to evaluate immunosuppressive strategies in HCV+ transplant recipients provided the opportunity to assess impact of live donor (LD) LT. Two hundred and ninety-five patients undergoing LT for HCV (260 deceased donor [DD] recipients/35 LD recipients), randomized to three regimens, were followed for two yr for patient and graft survival and rate and severity of recurrent HCV. Biopsies were performed at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. One- and two-yr patient survival for LD recipients was 88.1% and 81.1% vs. 90.5% and 84.6% for DD recipients (p = 0.5665). One- and two-yr graft survival for LD recipients was 82.9% and 76.2% vs. 87.9% and 81.7% for DD recipients (p = 0.3921). Recurrent HCV did not account for more deaths or graft losses in the LD recipients. In this prospective study, controlled for immunosuppression, use of LD organs did not increase the rate or severity of HCV recurrence. The more elective nature of LDLT affords an opportunity to manipulate donor and recipient factors that can impact upon outcomes.     

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up

Biliary complications after liver transplantation remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. Direct invasive cholangiographic techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), have procedure-related complications. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is non-invasive, safe, and accurate. The aim of this study was to evaluate MRCP in detecting biliary complications following liver transplantation and comparing findings with ERCP and PTC. Twenty-seven consecutive liver transplant recipients who presented with clinical and biochemical, ultrasonographic, or histological evidence of biliary complications were evaluated with MRCP. Patients were followed up for a median period of 36 months. The presence of a biliary complication was confirmed in 18 patients (66.6%): anastomotic biliary stricture in 12 (66.6%); diffuse intrahepatic biliary stricture in 5 (27.7%): ischemic (n = 3), recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (n = 2), and choledocholithiasis in one. In nine patients (33.3%), MRCP was normal. Six patients underwent ERCP, and eight PTC. There was a statistically significant correlation between the MRCP and both ERCP and PTC (p = 0.01) findings. The sensitivity and specificity of the MRCP were 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively, and the positive and negative predictive values, 94.4% and 89.9%, respectively. MRCP is an accurate imaging tool for the assessment of biliary complications after liver transplantation. We recommend that MRCP be the diagnostic imaging modality of choice in this setting, reserving direct cholangiography for therapeutic procedures.     

Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quantitation of serum hepatitis C virus RNA in liver transplant recipients: Relationship with severity of histological recurrence and implications in the pathogenesis of HCV infection

The reasons for the wide variation of incidence and severity of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation are not clear. We have studied liver transplant recipients to assess the impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype and HCV RNA quantification on HCV recurrence after transplantation. Twenty-two patients received transplants for HCV cirrhosis and were followed up with virological and histological assessments. Mean follow-up was 39 months. HCV genotype was determined with line probe assay (Inno-Lipa). HCV RNA quantity was determined in serum samples by use of polymerase chain reaction nested assay. HCV genotype 1 was detected in 13 patients and other genotypes in 9. Histological recurrence rates were 69% in patients with genotype 1 and 66% in patients with other genotypes. All cases of severe histological injury (chronic active hepatitis or cirrhosis) were observed in patients with genotype 1. HCV RNA quantity was significantly higher in patients with genotype 1 (mean, 2.023 x 10³ copies/mL) than in patients with other genotypes (mean, 27,403 copies/mL). In conclusion, the severity of histological recurrence after liver transplantation for HCV disease was higher in patients infected by HCV genotype 1 than in those infected with other genotypes. The levels of viral replication were higher in patients with HCV genotype 1 than in those with other genotypes. (Liver Transpl Surg 1997 Sep;3(5):501-5)     

Cyclosporine A Protects Against Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) reoccurs in a proportion of patients following liver transplantation (LT). The aims of our study were to evaluate the risk factors associated with PBC recurrence and determine whether recurrent disease constitutes a negative predictor for survival. One hundred and eight patients receiving LT for end‐stage PBC were studied. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 28 patients (26%). Probability of recurrent PBC at 5 years was 13% and 29% at 10 years with an overall incidence of 3.97 cases per 100 patient years. By univariate Cox analysis use of tacrolimus (HR 6.28, 95% CI, 2.44–16.11, p < 0.001) and mycophenolate mofetil (HR 5.21, 95% CI, 1.89–14.33, p = 0.001) were associated with higher risk of recurrence; whereas use of cyclosporine A (CsA) and azathioprine were associated with reduced risk of recurrence (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05–0.35, p < 0.001 and HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11–0.64, p = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariate Cox analysis, only CsA was independently associated with protection against recurrence (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06–0.71, p = 0.02). Five‐year probability of survival was 83% and 96%, in patients without and with recurrence (log‐rank test, p = 0.3). Although PBC transplant recipients receiving CsA have a lower risk of disease recurrence, the development of recurrent PBC did not impact on long‐term patient survival.     

Smoking increases recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

Smoking is a common behavior among transplant candidates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of smoking on a range of complications after liver transplantation. We reviewed data about patient demographics and various complications after liver transplantation that were recorded in the McGill University Health Centre liver transplant database over a 14-year period. χ(2) and multivariate analyses were performed. Four hundred forty-four liver transplants were performed from 1990 to 2004, and 63 were repeat transplants. Only primary liver transplant recipients were included in our analysis. Smokers (ie, active or former smokers) were more likely to be male (77.9% versus 62.7%, P = 0.009) and Caucasian (88.4% versus 78.0%, P = 0.03). The median survival time was 13.23 years for smokers and was not estimable for nonsmokers because of censoring. The median recurrent viral hepatitis-free survival time was 0.87 years for smokers and 4.10 years for nonsmokers (P = 0.03). The following variables were not found to be associated with the smoking status: patient survival (P = 0.78), time to biliary complications after liver transplantation (P = 0.67), time to the first rejection episode after liver transplantation (P = 0.61), and time to depression after liver transplantation (P = 0.67). A Cox proportional hazards regression showed that recurrent viral hepatitis-free survival was still strongly associated with smoking [HR = 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-3.68, P = 0.018] and was marginally associated with East Asian race (HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.06-1.06, P = 0.06) and male sex (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.34-1.02, P = 0.06). In conclusion, recurrent viral hepatitis-free survival was decreased for smokers after liver transplantation, likely because of the adverse effects of tobacco on immunological host defenses. Overall, the biliary complication-free, depression-free, and rejection-free survival rates were similar for smokers and nonsmokers. These findings suggest that smoking cessation should be encouraged, particularly in recipients undergoing transplantation for viral hepatitis.     

Slowly tapering off steroids protects the graft against hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C represents a major clinical problem after liver transplantation, but factors influencing the recurrent disease have not been well characterized. We analyzed the clinical records of all the patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV)–related liver disease in our Center between 1991 and 1997. Eighty consecutive HCV-positive (+) patients (60 men, ages 28 to 64) survived more than 1 month after transplantation and were followed for a median of 45 months. Diagnosis of recurrent chronic hepatitis C was made in 38 patients (47.5%), of whom 22 had moderate/severe chronic hepatitis. Decompensated cirrhosis occurred in six patients (7.5%). No difference in patient survival was found between patients with and without hepatitis C recurrence. No association was found between recurrent hepatitis C and presumed risk factors. The method of tapering off corticosteroids was significantly associated with both hepatitis C recurrence and the severity of hepatitis. In patients receiving a higher daily prednisone dose, 12 months after transplantation, the proportion of recurrent hepatitis C was 35.7% versus 66.6% (P = .02; odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25 to 10.36), and among patients receiving a higher daily prednisone dose, 6 months after transplantation, the proportion of moderate/severe chronic hepatitis C was 40% versus 89% (P = .03; OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.008 to 0.84). Finally, prednisone dose at month six was significantly associated with disease-free survival of the liver graft. In conclusion, our results seem to indicate that in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients, a long-term treatment with corticosteroids, slowly tapered off over time, may prevent the more aggressive forms of recurrent liver disease. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:884-888.)     

Hepatitis C Positive Grafts may be used in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Matched Analysis

Hepatitis C (HCV)-positive liver grafts have been increasingly used in patients with decompensated liver disease from HCV because of critical shortage of available organs. Fifty-nine recipients of HCV-positive grafts were matched to patients who received HCV-negative grafts. All recipients were transplanted for HCV liver disease. Matching variables were (1) status, (2) pre-transplant creatinine, (3) recipient age, (4) donor age, (5) warm ischemia time, and (6) year of transplantation. Both unmatched and matched analyses were performed on patient survival, graft survival, and time to HCV recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in patient, graft, or HCV recurrence-free survival between recipients of HCV-positive and HCV-negative grafts with matched and unmatched analyses (p > 0.05). The 3-year estimates of HCV disease-free survival were 12% (+/- 9%) and 19% (+/- 7%) using HCV-positive and -negative grafts, respectively. The use of HCV-positive grafts in recipients with HCV does not appear to affect patient survival, graft survival, or HCV recurrence when compared with the use of HCV-negative grafts. Our results suggest that HCV-positive grafts can be used in a HCV liver transplant recipient.     

自身免疫性肝病与病毒性肝炎肝硬化肝移植预后差异配对分析

目的  分析自身免疫性肝病(AILD)与病毒性肝炎肝硬化肝移植的预后差异及预后影响因素。方法  回顾性分析2002年1月至2017年1月行肝移植的75例受者临床资料。将受者分为AILD组(25例)和病毒性肝炎肝硬化组(50例)。观察受者的术中情况,包括器官热缺血时间、冷缺血时间、手术时间、无肝期、输血量; 观察术后并发症发生情况,包括重度急性肾损伤(AKI)、感染、急性排斥反应、胆道相关并发症、血管相关并发症、移植后糖尿病(PTDM); 观察出院后随访情况。分析肝移植受者预后的影响因素。结果  AILD组与病毒性肝炎肝硬化组的器官热缺血时间、冷缺血时间、手术时间、无肝期比较,差异均无统计学意义(均为P > 0.05)。AILD组受者术后急性排斥发生率高于病毒性肝炎肝硬化组受者(P < 0.05),术后重度AKI发生率低于病毒性肝炎肝硬化组受者(P < 0.05)。AILD组术后1、3、5年生存率分别为92%、87%、87%,病毒性肝炎肝硬化组术后1、3、5年生存率88%、88%、88%,两组受者累积生存率的差异均无统计学意义(均为P > 0.05)。单因素分析结果显示年龄、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分、重度AKI、感染、胆道相关并发症等5个指标是受者预后的影响因素(均为P < 0.05)。结论  AILD组和病毒性肝炎肝硬化组受者移植术后总体生存预后无明显差异,年龄、MELD评分、重度AKI、感染、胆道相关并发症是影响肝移植预后风险因素。     

Should patients with chronic hepatitis C infection be transplanted?

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million people throughout the world and 2 to 3 million Americans. End-stage liver disease secondary to chronic HCV infection is the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in this country. Currently, the gold standard for treatment for immunocompetent patients is a combination of peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin for 6 to 12 months depending on the genotype. This treatment achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in 54% to 61% of patients overall. Almost 50% of patients do not respond or have recurrences posttreatment and progress in over 10 to 20 years into chronic liver disease and its complications. Liver transplantation is the only therapeutic modality that impacts on quality of life and survival of these patients. However, recurrence of HCV in the new allograft is universal with accelerated progression to cirrhosis in 5 to 10 years. Response to treatment is usually low (20% to 30%), and associated with significant side effects and depression. A significant percentage of patients with recurrent HCV after transplantation require retransplantation to control the complications of end-stage liver disease. Other solid organ transplants recipients already HCV-positive, or infected at the time of transplantation from blood transfusions or an infected graft, develop accelerated, progressive liver disease facilitated by the adverse effects of immunosuppression in addition to HCV replication. To prevent morbidity, mortality, and high costs related to the consequences of HCV infection, all solid organ transplant candidates should be tested for HCV infection and treated appropriately with PEG-IFN and ribavirin prior to transplantation.     

Impact of the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation on the long-term viability of the graft.

BACKGROUND: The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) on graft viability is still not accurately defined. Our study aims to evaluate the magnitude and rate of progression of HCV-induced liver damage after OLT in a single institution cohort of 122 HCV-infected recipients. METHODS: All patients transplanted at our institution between 1988 and 1996 with positive serum HCV antibodies before OLT, minimum postoperative survival of 6 months, and without hepatitis B virus coinfection or severe non-HCV-related graft complications were retrospectively included in the study. RESULTS: HCV infection recurrence was almost universal, and genotype 1b was observed in 87% of the cases. After a median histological follow-up of 43 months (range: 7-96), evidences of HCV-induced histological damage were found in 94% of the cases. The actuarial rates of severe graft damage (including cirrhosis, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and submassive liver necrosis) were 15%, 33%, and 44% at 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively, and among these patients, 52% developed decompensated liver disease during the follow-up and 36% lost their grafts. The biochemical severity at the onset of the recurrent hepatitis and the development of cholestasis or cytomegalovirus disease were independent predictors of severe HCV-related graft damage. No differences were found in graft and patient survival when positive-HCV OLT recipients were compared with a coetaneous cohort of 215 non-HCV OLT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection recurrence leads to severe liver damage and subsequently to clinical decompensation in a significant proportion of OLT recipients. Some clinical and biochemical characteristics can predict the severity of HCV-induced graft damage.     

Comparison of hepatitis C histological recurrence rates and patient survival between split and deceased donor liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists as to whether there is an increased severity or frequency of recurrent hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection in recipients of adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) grafts. We sought to examine the time to histological recurrence and survival in HCV (+) patients who underwent split liver transplantation (SLT), which is technically similar to what occurs in the LDLT procedure. METHODS: Twenty four HCV (+) adult recipients were identified through the UNOS database as having had SLT procedures at three centers: Mount Sinai Medical Center, University of Chicago, and University of California at Los Angeles. Of these, 17 patients with comprehensive data were matched to 32 HCV (+) patients who underwent whole deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) during the same time period. Outcome and time to initial HCV recurrence as documented by liver biopsy were assessed. Liver biopsy was performed when clinically indicated. RESULTS: Patients who had SLT were significantly older (P=.01). There was no difference in number of rejection episodes (P=.40). Fifteen of 17 SLT (88%) versus 24/32 DDLT (75%) patients had documented HCV recurrence by biopsy (P=.46). The time to median cumulative incidence of recurrence of HCV post-liver transplantation was 12.6 months (SLT) versus 39.8 months (DDLT) patients. There was no difference in survival between SLT and DDLT patients (47 vs 70 months, P=.62) nor in cumulative incidence of histological HCV recurrence at 1, 2, and 3 years (P=.198, .919, and .806, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in the cumulative incidence of histological recurrence of HCV post-liver transplant or in survival between recipients of deceased donor and split liver transplants.     

A cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen may be better than tacrolimus for long-term liver allograft survival in recipients transplanted for hepatitis C

Rapid recurrence of severe hepatitis C (HCV) after liver transplantation is a major barrier to survival of the transplanted liver. While cyclosporine (CsA) in vitro has been shown to suppress HCV replication, an effect is not seen with tacrolimus (Tac). Evidence is inconsistent whether or how this translates to clinical practice. To expand the evidence on this issue, we analyzed graft survival and histological outcomes after liver transplantation for HCV hepatitis. METHODS: Using our longitudinal database (1991 onward) graft outcomes for all liver transplant recipients with HCV were evaluated (105 grafts in 97 patients). Severe activity, severe fibrosis, and graft survival were analyzed. All liver biopsies were scored (blinded) according to the Ludwig scale. Immunosuppression was based on prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor (Tac n = 89, 85%; CsA n = 15, 14%). Comparisons of outcomes using CsA versus Tac therapy were done using survival analysis via the log-rank test. RESULTS: Graft survival was significantly better in the CsA group. Although there was no apparent difference in severe activity (grade 2), there was a statistically significant difference in graft survival without fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = .01) and a trend toward a difference in fibrosis-free survival (P = 0.1). The rate of sustained response to antiviral therapy was twice as high in the CsA group, 50% versus 22% (P = 0.16; NS). CONCLUSIONS: Graft survival in liver transplant recipients with HCV may be greater with CsA-based immunosuppression. There may also be a lower rate of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in this group.     

Effect of early recurrence of hepatitis C on late biliary anastomotic stricture after liver transplantation

The aim of the current study was to clarify whether recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) infection affects biliary complications after liver transplantation (OLT), with special reference to late biliary anastomotic strictures (LBAS). We reviewed 665 consecutive adult OLT recipients with a choledochocholedochostomy without T-tube placement between 1990 and 2005. Biliary anastomotic stricture was confirmed by ERCP. The LBAS was defined as stricture that occurred 30 days or more after OLT. Recurrence of HCV was diagnosed by histological examination using liver biopsy specimen and confirmed by the presence of HCV-RNA. Early HCV recurrence was defined as recurrence that occurred within 6 months after OLT; LBAS occurred in 54 patients (8% of total). Mean duration from OLT to occurrence of LBAS was 6.9 months (1-44 months). Patients with HCV infection had higher occurrence of LBAS than did non-HCV patients (11% vs 5%, P = .0093). Among HCV patients, those with early HCV recurrence had exclusively high rate of LBAS (16%). In multivariate analyses, early recurrence of HCV (P < .001, relative risk [RR] 6.4), as well as occurrence of HAT (P = .0018, RR 8.0), and prolonged CIT (P = .034, RR 3.3) were independent risk factors affecting LBAS. In conclusion, patients with HCV infection have increased occurrence of LBAS after OLT. Additionally, early recurrence of HCV contributes to a higher rate of LBAS.     

The effect of immunosuppressive regimens on the recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has been described in liver transplant recipients. Type of immunosuppression has been reported to influence the frequency of recurrence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the occurrence and pattern of recurrent PBC in our liver transplant recipients and determine any association of immunosuppressive agents with its recurrence. Patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for PBC were identified from the University of Chicago Liver Transplant Database. Recurrent PBC was diagnosed based on specific pathological criteria. Of 46 patients who underwent OLT for PBC between 1984 and 2000, a total of 7 patients (15%) were diagnosed with recurrent PBC at a median of 78 months (range, 27 to 120 months) after OLT. Forty-three percent of patients were administered cyclosporine, whereas 57% were administered tacrolimus before disease recurrence. Rates of recurrence were not different between patients maintained on cyclosporine therapy (16%) compared with those maintained on tacrolimus therapy (18%; P = 1.0). There also was no difference in frequency of rejection episodes or duration of corticosteroid therapy between those who did and did not have recurrent PBC. In conclusion, recurrent PBC developed in a small number of patients 2 years or longer after OLT. In our population, there was no difference in recurrence rates between those administered cyclosporine or tacrolimus for immunosuppression. (Liver Transpl 2003;9:733-736.)     

Liver transplantation using donors older than 80 years: a single-center experience

AIM: The shortage of organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has forced transplantation centers to expand the donor pool by using donors traditionally labeled as "extended criteria donors." One such example is OLT using a donor with advanced age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients who received a liver graft from cadaveric donors older than 80 years. We analyzed pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics, as well as the evolution of the recipients. RESULTS: All 10 donors were older than 80 years (median age, 83.5; range, 80-93). No steatosis (>30%) was accepted in the older donor group. Medium follow-up was 19.5 months. The most frequent cause for OLT was hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (8/10 patients). We had 1 case of primary nonfunction, 1 patient died immediately after surgery because of extrahepatic complications (cardiac arrest), and 2 other patients had a severe HCV recurrence and died after 1 and 2 years from OLT, respectively. Five patients had HCV recurrence and biliary complications were present in 60% of the patients. No cases of acute or chronic rejection were described. Overall survival rates after 1 and 3 years were 80% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Old donor age is not an absolute contraindication to OLT. Liver grafts from donors older than 80 years can be used knowing that there is a high risk of postoperative complications. Furthermore, the increased risk of developing severe HCV recurrence, related to older donor age, suggests that such livers should be used in HCV-negative recipients.     

Consequences of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in liver transplant recipients: a matched control study

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant recipients are at high risk for multi-drug resistant infections because of broad-spectrum antibiotic and immunosuppression. This study evaluates the clinical and financial impact of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Liver transplant recipients with VRE from 1995 to 2002 were identified and matched (age, gender, UNOS status, liver disease and transplant date) to controls. Demographics, clinical factors, co-infections, antibiotic use, length of stay, abdominal surgeries, biliary complications, survival and resource utilization were compared with matched controls. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were found to have 28 VRE infections via evaluation of microbiologic culture results of all liver transplant patients in the transplant registry. Thirty-eight non-VRE patients served as matched controls. The four most common sites VRE was cultured from included blood (35%), peritoneal fluid (35%), bile (20%), and urine (12%). Median time from transplant to infection was 48 d (range of 4-348). No significant differences in demographics were observed. The VRE group had a higher incidence of prior antibiotic use than the non-VRE group (95% vs. 34%; p < 0.05). The VRE group also experienced more abdominal surgery (20/19 vs. 3/38; p = 0.029), biliary complications (9/19 vs. 9/38; p = 0.018) and a longer length of stay (42.5 vs. 21.7 d; p = .005). Survival in the VRE group was lower (52% vs. 82%; p = 0.048). Six of the 19 VRE patients were treated with linezolid for eight infection episodes, and four of six patients survived. Eight patients were treated with quinupristin/dalfopristin for nine infections, and two of eight survived. Increased cost of care was observed in the VRE group. Laboratory costs were higher in the VRE group (6500 dollars vs. 1750; p = 0.02) as well. CONCLUSION: VRE was associated with prior antibiotic use, multiple abdominal surgeries, biliary complications and resulted in decreased survival compared to non-VRE control patients. VRE patients also utilized more hospital resources. Linezolid showed a trend toward improved survival.     

DR antigens influence graft outcome and HCV recurrence after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence following liver transplantation is universal. However, the severity of recurrence is highly variable between patients. We speculated that recipient DR antigens or the level of DR mismatching between the recipient and the donor might affect the severity of HCV recurrence and allograft survival. Clinical outcome was compared between HCV+ recipients with DR2, DR3, or DR5 versus HCV+ recipients with all other DR antigens. Recipients with DR3 had reduced allograft survival (P < .02), a higher rate of HCV recurrence (P < .05), and more severe liver disease (P < .05). Recipients with DR5 had superior allograft survival (P < .05), low rates of HCV recurrence (P < .05), and benign liver disease (P < .05). Clinical outcome of recipients with DR2 was equivalent (P = Ns) to the non-DR2, -3, -5 recipients. The incidence of acute rejection was equivalent (P = Ns) in all groups. The level of DR mismatching between donor and recipient did not affect HCV recurrence or severity. However, allograft survival was better (P < .05) in recipients with zero DR mismatches. The data show that host genetic factors play an important role in HCV recurrence and allograft outcome after liver transplantation. In addition, identification of DR antigens may help predict an HCV+ patient's relative risk for severe HCV recurrence.