Disaster preparedness among vulnerable older adults with chronic diseases: Results from a cross‐sectional study in Incheon,Korea

About 80% of older adults have at least one chronic condition that makes them more vulnerable than healthy people during a disaster. This study examined the association of general health status and chronic disease status, respectively, with disaster preparedness among vulnerable older adults with chronic diseases. The 165 participants (100 females, 65 male) comprising the study population were taking a health course for chronic disease management at a public health center in Incheon, Korea from March to April 2012. A relatively small percentage of households had a complete set of disaster preparedness supplies, an emergency evacuation plan, and a three‐day supply of medications. Respondents with multiple chronic diseases were generally more likely to have a three‐day supply of medications in comparison with their healthier counterparts. To improve preparedness among vulnerable older adults, a “bottom up” assessment of directly canvassing the views of older people is necessary and should be transferred into practical conditions of disaster preparedness.     

Restraint use among nursing home residents: cross‐sectional study and prospective cohort study

Aims and objectives. To investigate (1) the prevalence of physical restraints and psychoactive medication, (2) newly administered physical restraints, frequency of application of the devices and frequency of psychoactive medication on demand during 12‐month follow‐up and (3) characteristics associated with restraint use in nursing homes. Background. High quality data on restraint use in German nursing homes are lacking so far. Such information is the basis for interventions to achieve a restraint‐free care. Design. Cross‐sectional study and prospective cohort study. Setting and subjects. Thirty nursing homes with 2367 residents in Hamburg, Germany. Methods. External investigators obtained prevalence of physical restraints by direct observation on three occasions on one day, psychoactive drugs were extracted from residents’ records and prospective data were documented by nurses. Results. Residents’ mean age was 86 years, 81% were female. Prevalence of residents with at least one physical restraint was 26·2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 21·3–31·1]. Centre prevalence ranged from 4·4 to 58·9%. Bedrails were most often used (in 24·5% of residents), fixed tables, belts and other restraints were rare. Prevalence of residents with at least one psychoactive drug was 52·4% (95% CI 48·7–56·1). The proportion of residents with at least one physical restraint after the first observation week of 26·3% (21·3–31·3) cumulated to 39·5% (33·3–45·7) at the end of follow‐up (10·4 SD 3·3 months). The relative frequency of observation days with at least one device ranged from 4·9–64·8% between centres. No characteristic was found to explain centre differences. Conclusions. The frequency of physical restraints and psychoactive drugs in German nursing homes is substantial. Pronounced centre variation suggests that standard care is possible without restraints. Relevance to clinical practice. Effective restraint minimisation approaches are urgently warranted. An evidence‐based guideline may overcome centre differences towards a restraint‐free nursing home care.     

Unintentional injuries among older adults in northern Sweden – a one‐year population‐based study

Scand J Caring Sci; 2011; 25; 185–193
Unintentional injuries among older adults in northern Sweden – a one‐year population‐based study Aim: To study the epidemiology of unintentional injuries in a population of 21 000 Swedish older adults (65+) and to compare the injury incidence with similar data collected two decades earlier. Method: This is a retrospective epidemiologic cross‐sectional study based on a 1‐year data set of all the 1753 registered injury events from a well‐defined population. Result: The injury rate per 1000 individuals was three times higher in the 85+ age group than in the 65–74 age group. The rate was also higher in women than in men aged 75 and older. Fractures, especially on lower and upper extremities, were the most common injuries. Falls in residential care facilities caused the most serious injuries. In transport areas, pedestrian falls and bicyclist crashes were much more common than car crashes. Of the 1753 people injured, 42% were treated as inpatients for a total of 11 569 days; 86% of these days were caused by injury events in the home (57%) or in residential care facilities (29%). Our 65+ age group occupied 69% of all hospital bed‐days for trauma in all ages (0–102 years). Conclusion: Over the last two decades, the injury and fracture rate per 1000 individuals has increased by 40–50%, especially in the older age groups. During this time, the nursing strategy for older adults has changed in Sweden. As a result, more people live in their homes nowadays. This increase is distressing especially when we consider the current knowledge of preventive measures. The high number and proportion (>2/3) of inpatient trauma days for these age groups are a heavy burden for the medical sector. These facts call for more effective preventive measures, especially in the home and in residential care facilities, to minimize the negative health effects and the rising health costs.