Electrodiagnostic evaluation of fecal incontinence

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of electrodiagnostic testing (EDT) for the evaluation of fecal incontinence (FI). Over a 5-year period, 225 patients (174 females) with FI were prospectively studied with anal manometry, anal ultrasonography, anal electromyography (AEMG), and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) assessment. The mean age was 60 (range 12–94) years. Causes of FI identified by clinical evaluation were obstetric injuries (45), rectal prolapse (43), iatrogenic or other trauma (42), neurologic disease (23), and idiopathic (72). EDT revealed abnormalities in 76% of patients. The incidence of pudendal neuropathy (PN) was 36% (bilateral 21%, unilateral 15%). Patients with PN were older than were those with normal PNTML (mean 71 vs. 63 years; P < 0.002). No relationship between squeeze pressure and PN could be demonstrated (P = 0.9). Reduced motor unit potential (MUP) recruitment on AEMG was present in 60% and was associated with decreased squeeze pressure (P < 0.001) and increased MUP polyphasia (P < 0.001). Concurrence of AEMG and anal ultrasonographic findings was observed in 35 of 41 patients (84%). Defects were overlooked in one study but identified by the other on three occasions, each. Moreover, 8 of 22 patients with demonstrated sphincter defects had unsuspected PN or extensive sphincter injury on AEMG that precluded sphincter repair. In conclusion, EDT proved to be a valuable tool in the evaluation and subsequent treatment of patients with FI. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Semi‐automated vectorial analysis of anorectal motion by magnetic resonance defecography in healthy subjects and fecal incontinence

Background Inter‐observer variability limits the reproducibility of pelvic floor motion measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Our aim was to develop a semi‐automated program measuring pelvic floor motion in a reproducible and refined manner. Methods Pelvic floor anatomy and motion during voluntary contraction (squeeze) and rectal evacuation were assessed by MRI in 64 women with fecal incontinence (FI) and 64 age‐matched controls. A radiologist measured anorectal angles and anorectal junction motion. A semi‐automated program did the same and also dissected anorectal motion into perpendicular vectors representing the puborectalis and other pelvic floor muscles, assessed the pubococcygeal angle, and evaluated pelvic rotation. Key Results Manual and semi‐automated measurements of anorectal junction motion (r = 0.70; P < 0.0001) during squeeze and evacuation were correlated, as were anorectal angles at rest, squeeze, and evacuation; angle change during squeeze or evacuation was less so. Semi‐automated measurements of anorectal and pelvic bony motion were also reproducible within subjects. During squeeze, puborectalis injury was associated (P ≤ 0.01) with smaller puborectalis but not pelvic floor motion vectors, reflecting impaired puborectalis function. The pubococcygeal angle, reflecting posterior pelvic floor motion, was smaller during squeeze and larger during evacuation. However, pubococcygeal angles and pelvic rotation during squeeze and evacuation did not differ significantly between FI and controls. Conclusion & Inferences This semi‐automated program provides a reproducible, efficient, and refined analysis of pelvic floor motion by MRI. Puborectalis injury is independently associated with impaired motion of puborectalis, not other pelvic floor muscles in controls and women with FI.