Costs of treatment and outcomes associated with second-line therapy and greater for relapsed ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: Most women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) will develop disease progression or recurrence with resistance to platinum therapy. We report overall costs and treatment outcomes associated with topotecan or gemcitabine administration in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant EOC patients. METHODS: Patients who received topotecan (n = 51) or gemcitabine (n = 56) as second-line therapy or greater for platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant EOC were retrospectively identified. Per patient costs for each regimen were determined and compared. RESULTS: The mean total direct cost per cycle per patient of gemcitabine was $2732.28, with a median total direct cost per cycle of $1382.73. The mean total direct cost per cycle per patient of topotecan was $7832.07, with a median total direct cost per cycle of $4219.02. By comparison of the means, total direct cost per cycle per patient was significantly more expensive for topotecan (P = 0.001). Fifty-six patients received a total of 415 cycles of gemcitabine, median 5 cycles per patient (range, 1-59). Thirteen (23.2%; 95% CI, 11.9-34.5%) of 56 patients displayed clinical benefit, with median PFS of 1.8 months and median overall survival (OS) of 8.2 months. Fifty-one patients received topotecan, for a total of 264 cycles, median 4 cycles per patient (range, 1-42). Twenty-eight (56%; 95% CI, 42.0-70.0%) of 50 patients achieved clinical benefit, with PFS and OS medians of 3.6 and 16.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and topotecan are active agents in heavily pretreated, platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant EOC patients. Topotecan was more costly to deliver. Although a larger percentage of patients received clinical benefit with topotecan use, this likely reflects physician selection for use of topotecan earlier in the course of disease.     

Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of irinotecan hydrochloride and mitomycin C in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer: case reports

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and toxicity of salvage chemotherapy with a combination of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) and mitomycin C (MMC) for platinum-and paclitaxel-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer are reported. CASE REPORT: Three consecutive patients with platinum- and paclitaxel- resistant epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with 120 mg/m2 of CPT-11 (days 1 and 15) and 7 mg/m2 of MMC (days 1 and 15) every four weeks. In all three cases partial responses were achieved and overall survivals were 17 months or longer. Most of the adverse side-effects were manageable. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen could be administered even in heavily pretreated patients with platinum- and paclitaxel- resistance. Phase I and II studies are needed to confirm the feasibility of this treatment. The efficacy of most salvage treatments for platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer is disappointing, and our cases might be of interest from the perspective of treating platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer.     

A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer weekly paclitaxel has shown an equal efficiency and better toxicity profile compared to three-weekly paclitaxel in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. We wanted to study response rate, response duration and toxicity in platinum-resistant tumors with emphasis on tumors also resistant to three-weekly paclitaxel. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with platinum-resistant disease, treated with weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, 1-hour infusion, were evaluable for response and toxicity (Group A). Of these, 39 patients (Group B) had tumors resistant to paclitaxel as well. RESULTS: Overall response rate was 56% (12% CR, 44% PR, 19% SD, 25% PD) and 49% in group B: 5% CR, 44% PR, 23% SD, 28% PD. Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months and 4.0 months in group A and B, respectively. Median survival was 13.7 months in both groups. Toxicity was mild. Only two patients had grade 2 neutropenia and no neutropenic fever was recorded. No worsening in pre-existing neurotoxicity or hypersensitivity reactions was observed. CONCLUSION: Weekly administration of paclitaxel is associated with promising response rates in patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. The treatment is well tolerated with non-cumulative hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity.     

Improved therapeutic index of lower dose topotecan chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)) administered daily for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle is an established chemotherapeutic regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer. However, noncumulative myelosuppression has limited its use by many clinicians. We sought to determine whether a lower dose of topotecan could provide comparable tumor activity and higher tolerability in pretreated ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer patients with measurable disease or elevated cancer antigen 125 levels (evaluable disease). Patients were treated with topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2)) given by 30-min intravenous infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Treatment records from 37 women who had been treated with a median of 3 courses (range, 1 to 17) of lower dose topotecan were evaluated; all were evaluable for tolerability and 36 were evaluable for response. Patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1 to 6) previous treatments. The overall response rate was 22% (8/36); the response rates for patients with evaluable disease and measurable disease were 35.7 (5/14) and 13.6% (3/22), respectively. An additional 8 patients (22%) achieved stable disease. Grade 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 48.6, 5.4, and 5.4% of patients, respectively. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support was used in 37% of patients, including 5 who experienced febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Topotecan at 1.0 mg/m(2) x 5 days every 21 days is active in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer, with significant improvements in hematologic toxicity. In heavily pretreated patients-topotecan can be safely given at reduced doses without apparent loss of efficacy.     

A phase I trial of oxaliplatin and topotecan in recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Oxaliplatin and topotecan have demonstrated activity as single agents against recurrent platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer, as well as synergy in vitro. This was a dose-finding study of combination therapy with weekly topotecan and alternating-week oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients had a diagnosis of recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma, a performance status of 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. On days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) via intravenous infusion. On days 1, 8, and 15, patients received an escalating dose of intravenous topotecan (2.0-4.0 mg/m2). Five dose levels were planned with a minimum cohort of 3 patients at each level. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled and received a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated dose was 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3.0 mg/m2 of topotecan, and grade 3 neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Four of nine (44%) evaluable patients had stable disease or a partial response to the drug combination as assessed by cancer antigen-125 levels. CONCLUSIONS: A 28-day schedule of oxaliplatin and topotecan is safe and well tolerated. Because of the in vitro synergy observed between topoisomerase I inhibitors and platinum derivatives and the tolerability reported in the current study, this regimen warrants further investigation.     

A phase II study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES: Docetaxel is an inhibitor of microtubule depolymerization and has demonstrated activity in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer and gynecologic cancer. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a study of docetaxel in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma to determine its activity, and nature and degree of toxicity, in this cohort of patients. METHODS: Patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma, defined as progression while on or within 6 months of therapy, were eligible if they had measurable disease and had not received more than one chemotherapy regimen. Docetaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) was administered iv over 1 h every 21 days. A prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone 8 mg bid was begun 24 h before docetaxel administration and continued for 48 h thereafter. Hepatic function was strictly monitored. RESULTS: Sixty patients were entered and treated with a total of 256 courses, with all 60 evaluable for toxicity and 58 evaluable for response. Responses were observed in 22.4% of patients, with 5.2% achieving complete response and 17.2% achieving partial response (95% CI, 12.5-35.3%). The median duration of response was 2.5 months. The likelihood of observing a response did not appear to be related to the length of the prior paclitaxel-free interval or duration of prior paclitaxel infusions. The principal adverse effect of grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 75% of patients. There was one treatment-related death. Dose reductions were required in 36% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel is active in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and peritoneal cancer but, in view of significant hematologic toxicity, further study is warranted to ascertain its optimal dose and schedule.     

Weekly topotecan for recurrent endometrial cancer: a case series and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in ovarian and endometrial cancers when administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. Recently, topotecan has been studied on a weekly dosing schedule for the treatment of ovarian cancer and found to have efficacy with reduced toxicity. The aim of this study is to review the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) experience with weekly topotecan dosing in women with recurrent endometrial cancer. We have included a review of the literature of weekly topotecan in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancer. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we identified all women with recurrent endometrial cancer treated with topotecan at MSKCC from May 1996 to February 2004. Patients treated on a weekly schedule were assessed for toxicity and response. A review of the literature pertaining to weekly topotecan in the treatment of endometrial cancer was also performed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were treated with weekly topotecan during the study period, with doses ranging from 2.5-4.0 mg/m(2) on a 2- or 3-week schedule with 1 week off. The median age of the patients was 60 years old (range, 47-76 years), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. Six of the 11 patients were previously treated with more than three chemotherapy regimens and eight had received prior pelvic radiation. Ninety-seven percent of treatment doses were delivered as scheduled, and only two patients required dose reductions. One patient achieved a prolonged partial response for 54 weeks, and two patients had stabilization of disease for 15 weeks each. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan has antitumor activity and is well tolerated in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, including those patients with multiple prior treatments. Topotecan on a weekly bolus schedule should be evaluated in prospective trials to better establish its role in the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.     

Retrospective analysis of weekly topotecan as salvage therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data were collected by retrospective review of patient records. Eligible patients had received > or =2 prior regimens for ovarian cancer before treatment with weekly topotecan. Efficacy was determined by measurable disease or CA 125 levels. Adverse event and growth factor support data were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age, 61 years) were evaluable for safety and received a total of 244 4-week cycles of therapy (median, 3; range, 1-21 cycles). Most patients (84%) had measurable disease, and 30% had performance status of > or =2. Patients had received two to six prior treatments for ovarian cancer. Median weekly dose per patient was topotecan 3.7 mg/m(2). Grade 4 hematologic toxicities (generally manageable) occurred in 4% of patients. One patient had febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue in two (4%) patients. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response. Of 35 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 11 (31%) had a partial response (median duration, 3 months), and 15 (43%) patients had stable disease (median duration, 3.5 months). Of 41 evaluable patients with elevated CA 125 (median, 154 U/l; range, 47-7200 U/l), 11 (27%) had > or =50% decreases or normalization of CA 125 levels. Median time to progression in all patients with stable disease has not been reached (follow-up range, 1.5-17.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan is active and well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Prospective studies of this regimen are warranted.     

Pilot study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan plus oral etoposide for platinum- and taxane-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with intravenous irinotecan and oral etoposide in women with platinum- and taxane-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Between October 2002 and September 2005, we studied 27 women with platinum- and taxane-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. Irinotecan was administered in an intravenous dose of 70 mg/m(2) as a 90-min infusion on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, and etoposide was administered in an oral dose of 50 mg/day on days 1 to 21. For heavily pretreated patients, the initial dose of irinotecan was lowered to 60 mg/m(2). Treatment cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: All 27 patients were eligible and assessable. There were 11 partial responses and 1 complete response for an overall response rate of 44.4%. The median durations of overall response and of stable disease were 11 months and 8 months, respectively. The major toxicity was neutropenia (grade 3, 22.2%; grade 4, 37.1%). Diarrhea was infrequent and mild, and gastrointestinal toxicity was moderate and manageable. Acute myeloid leukemia (M5) developed as a secondary malignancy in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our pilot study suggest that a combination of irinotecan and oral etoposide is effective and tolerable in women with platinum- and taxane-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.     

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

Effectiveness of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and toxicity of weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Twenty patients were treated with topotecan at a dose of 4 mg/m(2) weekly. Efficacy was determined according to the Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group criteria. Median age was 62 years (45-78). Patients had received 1-7 (median 3) prior chemotherapy lines. A total of 203 weekly treatments were administered. In 13 patients (65%) treatment delay was necessary due to bone marrow toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 11 patients (55%) and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four patients (20%). Six patients (30%) needed a dose reduction, and 42 cycles (21%) were given with dose reduction. No neutropenia, fever, or sepsis was observed. There was one complete response and one partial response (response rate 10%). All patients with response had platin-sensitive disease (three out of eight). Six patients needed blood transfusion. None of the patients required granulocyte/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. The median duration of response was 13 months. In addition, there were four patients (20%) with a stable disease lasting at least for 4 months. Based on the results of this Phase II study, the toxicity of weekly topotecan seems to be lower than with the 3-weekly topotecan. The response rate of 10% is low but was not expected to be higher as these patients were heavily pretreated.     

Weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan after failure of > or =1 prior regimen were reviewed. Patients received topotecan (median starting dose approximately 2.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Antitumor response was assessed after 2 cycles by serial CA-125 levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five heavily pretreated patients received a mean of 5 cycles of topotecan (range, 1-13 cycles). Thirty-two patients had definable platinum sensitivity (16 sensitive, 8 resistant, 8 refractory). Median age was 56 years. A total of 177 cycles (534 weeks) of topotecan was administered. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, and no grade 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, was observed in 2, 2, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Based on serial CA-125 measurements, there were 1 (3%) complete and 5 (15%) partial responses, with 1 of the partial responses in a patient with platinum-refractory disease. Stable disease was reported in 13 (38%) patients, including 5 patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan demonstrates activity and is well tolerated compared with historical data with the standard 5-day schedule. Higher doses may be warranted because of the high tolerability shown for weekly topotecan. Weekly topotecan may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, especially heavily pretreated patients who might require dosing schedules with improved tolerability.     

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the activity of single agent weekly paclitaxel in patients with both platinum and paclitaxel (delivered every 3 weeks)-resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer (defined as progression during, or recurrence < 6 months following, their prior treatment with both agents) received single agent weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2/week) until disease progression (assuming acceptable toxicity). Following the initial 12 weekly doses, treatment could be given for 3 weeks, with a 1 week break. RESULTS: In this chemoresistant population, the objective response rate was 20.9%. Serious adverse events were relatively uncommon (neuropathy-grade 2: 21%; grade 3: 4%; and grade 3 fatigue: 8%). CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of paclitaxel can be a useful management approach in women with both platinum and paclitaxel (given every 3 weeks)-resistant ovarian cancer. It would be appropriate to directly compare weekly to every 3-week paclitaxel delivery in the setting of primary chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer.     

A phase I/II trial of weekly topotecan and carboplatin in potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Topotecan and carboplatin are active in relapsed ovarian cancer, but attempts to combine these agents are limited by myelotoxicity. This phase I/II trial combined weekly topotecan, which is less myelosuppressive than the standard 5-day regimen, with carboplatin in patients with potentially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma (PS-OVCa/PCa). METHODS: Eligible patients had PS-OVCa/PCa, performance status 0-2, and normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions. On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 5) followed by topotecan 2.0 mg/m2, both via 30-min intravenous infusion. Topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 also was administered on days 8 and 15. Treatment was withheld for neutropenia or thrombocytopenia on day 8 or 15. Dose escalation was planned. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received a total of 115 (median, 6) cycles of chemotherapy. With carboplatin AUC 4, neutropenia prevented dose escalation of topotecan; hematologic toxicity caused 34/105 (32%) weekly treatments to be withheld. However, carboplatin could be dose escalated to AUC 5 when the day 15 dose of topotecan was withheld. In the intent-to-treat population, there were 4 (24%) complete and 9 (53%) partial responses, 2 (12%) patients (at the carboplatin AUC 4 dose) with stable disease, and 2 (12%) nonevaluable patients. CONCLUSION: Carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 in combination with topotecan 2.0 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle is well tolerated and active in patients with PS-OVCa/PCa. A phase II trial comparing this with other carboplatin therapeutic doublets in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer is warranted.     

A phase II clinical trial of topotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

A phase II clinical trial conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of topotecan and carboplatin as first-line therapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was the objective of this study. Patients had histologically confirmed ovarian epithelial cancer with at least one measurable lesion. Patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 3 every 21 days for six cycles. All 42 patients enrolled were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median number of cycles delivered was six. Overall response rate was 71%, with 19 clinical complete responses (45%) and 11 clinical partial responses (26%). Median survival time was 47 months and 5-year survival was 42%. Myelosuppression was the predominant toxicity, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 100% of patients. However, this toxicity was transient and easily manageable; no patients experienced febrile neutropenia. The combination of topotecan and carboplatin is active in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Delay of therapy by 1 week or topotecan dose reduction to 1.25 mg/m(2) is the first-choice option to reduce topotecan toxicity without affecting the efficacy. Moreover, a chemotherapy regimen using weekly topotecan, which is currently being tested, should be considered.     

Third-line chemotherapy in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma patients

Ovarian carcinoma is a malignant disease with a high rate of recurrence, necessitating repeated chemotherapy treatments. We conducted a retrospective study in patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian, fallopian tubes and primary peritoneal carcinoma patients treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. We evaluated the responses, progression-free intervals, and overall survival duration of 51 patients after third-line chemotherapy treatment. The overall response rate was 16% (eight cases) with 2% complete response rate (one case) and 14% partial response rate (seven cases). Stable disease was achieved in 31% (16 cases). The progression-free intervals of 24 patients who had response and stable disease was 7.4 months (range, 1.4-18.4 months). The median overall survival of all patients was 15.8 months (95% CI, 8.1-23.4 months). The median survival duration of eight responders was not significantly different from that of 43 nonresponders, 18.9 months (95% CI, 2.4-35.4 months) versus 15.8 months (95% CI, 6.4-25.2 months), respectively (P = 0.73). In conclusion, third-line chemotherapy in our study results in a modest response and prolongation of progression-free interval without obvious impact on survival. The decision to utilize third-line chemotherapy will be a balance of the limited efficacy, toxicity of the agents, and the expertise of the clinician.     

Response and toxicity to topotecan in sensitive ovarian cancer cases with small residual disease after first-line treatment with carboplatinum and paclitaxel

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this open uncontrolled study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of topotecan in ovarian cancer cases with microscopic small residual disease to a first-line treatment, given as sequential treatment, including carboplatinum and paclitaxel. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were laparotomically or laparoscopically documented microscopic or macroscopic (<2 cm) residual disease after first-line chemotherapy including carboplatinum plus paclitaxel in patients with histologically documented epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage III or IV at first diagnosis. All patients had a response >50% after first-line treatment. Eligible patients received 1.25 mg/m(2)/day of topotecan intravenously as a 30-min infusion for 5 consecutive days every 21 days for four cycles. A total of 38 women entered the study. Surgical "third-look" laparotomy or laparoscopy was performed in patients without clinical/instrumental evidence of progressive disease within 1 month from the last topotecan administration. RESULTS: A complete response was observed in 10 cases (28.6%, 95% confidence interval, based on the Poisson's approximation, 15.6-59. 5), a partial response in 1 (2.5%), progressive disease in 11 (31. 4%) and no change/stable disease in 13. The median duration of response was 8 months (range 5-20). The overall 1-year survival after treatment was 82.8% (SE 6.4). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that sequential therapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel followed by topotecan, all given at standard doses, is feasible and provides favorable response rates.     

A phase II trial of weekly topotecan for patients with secondary platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma following the failure of second-line therapy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity associated with weekly topotecan administered to patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC) in the third-line setting. METHODS: Patients with measurable platinum-sensitive EOC following failure of second-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase II study. All patients were initially treated with cytoreductive surgery and platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Continuous, weekly topotecan was administered at a starting dose of 4 mg/m(2). Toxicity and efficacy were assessed at various time points after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Twenty nine patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Toxicity was acceptable with grade 1/2 nausea being the most commonly experienced side effect (52%). Nine patients (31%) had grade 3/4 leukopenia; however, only 3 patients had febrile neutropenia. Thirteen patients had a treatment delay and six required dose reductions. Twenty two patients were evaluable for efficacy. The overall response rate for weekly topotecan was 13.6% [95% CI; -0.7-27.9%] with 1 complete response, and 2 partial responses. Twelve patients (54.5%), including 2 with minor responses, had stable disease for a median duration of 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan at the current schedule in the third-line setting in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC has modest clinical activity. Toxicity associated with this regimen is acceptable but growth factor support, dose reductions, or schedule alterations may need to be considered in many of these patients.     

A phase I study of weekly topotecan and Paclitaxel in previously treated epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients

OBJECTIVE: We have previously reported on the feasibility of weekly topotecan as single-agent therapy in previously treated patients with ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly bolus intravenous (IV) topotecan combined with weekly paclitaxel in a comparable patient population. METHODS: Previously treated ovarian cancer patients with measurable disease and/or elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) received (as second-line or third-line therapy) weekly 30-min bolus IV topotecan starting at 2 mg/m(2) combined with weekly paclitaxel starting at a dose of 60 mg/m(2). In this intrapatient dose-escalation study, topotecan and paclitaxel were escalated in parallel until the MTD was reached, defined as the first dose level at which >or= 2 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 26 patients were evaluable for toxicity and received a total of 306 weeks of therapy (median, 13 weeks; range, 5 to 33 weeks). No significant dose-limiting toxicity was observed up to a weekly bolus IV topotecan dose of 3 mg/m(2) and a concurrent paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2). The MTD was topotecan 3.5 mg/m(2) plus 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicities included anemia and fatigue, with 10 of 21 patients receiving epoetin alfa for grade 3 or 4 anemia; only 1 patient required a blood transfusion. Two patients had a treatment delay of at least 1 week and only 1 patient required a dose reduction to maintain the weekly schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the recommended initial dose for this novel regimen is topotecan 3 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2). Further investigation of the efficacy of weekly topotecan plus paclitaxel in less heavily pretreated patients is warranted.     

Topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma

Abstract.   Piura B, Rabinovich A. Topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 612–617.
Topotecan has demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian carcinoma. This report examines the activity and toxicity of topotecan in 29 heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma. Topotecan 1.5 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1–5, every 21 days. It was second-line chemotherapy in 6 (20.7%) patients, third-line in 15 (51.7%), fourth-line in 4 (13.8%), fifth-line in 3 (10.3%), and seventh-line in 1 (3.4%). Median dose intensity was 1.667 mg/m²/week, and median relative dose intensity was 0.67. Disease complete response was observed in 5 (17.2%) patients, partial response in 1 (3.4%), stable disease in 12 (41.4%), and progressive disease in 11 (37.9%). CA-125 complete response was observed in 3 (10.3%) patients, partial response in 11 (37.9%), stable level in 5 (17.2%), and progressive level in 9 (31%), and no data were available in 1 (3.4%) patient. Toxicity was mainly hematologic: grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 20 (69%) patients, grade 3–4 leukopenia in 12 (41.4%), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 9 (31%), and grade 3–4 anemia in 2 (6.9%). It is concluded that topotecan has considerable activity and noncumulative hematologic toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinoma.