A comparison of the cortisol suppression index and the dexamethasone suppression test in prepubertal children

Results of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and the cortisol suppression index (CSI) were compared in 50 depressed prepubertal children and 36 control subjects. The 4:00 p.m. DST, the two-point DST, and the 8:00 a.m. revised criterion CSI yielded the best results and had similar clinical utility and diagnostic confidence values.     

Comparison of the dexamethasone suppression test and the cortisol suppression index

Among 50 inpatients, the sensitivity and specificity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) were 51.7% and 85.7%, respectively. For the cortisol suppression index they were 10.3% and 91% at 8:00 a.m. and 51.7% and 57.1% at 4:00 p.m. Thus, the cortisol suppression index does not appear to be an adequate substitute for the DST.     

Use of saliva cortisol in the dexamethasone suppression test

In a sample of 26 inpatients (15 primary endogenous depressives and a heterogeneous comparison group of 11 psychiatric patients), results of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for endogenous depression were compared when cortisol was measured in plasma (total and free) and in saliva. Results showed a close linear relationship among plasma total and free cortisol, plasma total cortisol, and saliva cortisol, and between free plasma and saliva cortisol. A saliva cortisol cutoff point of 70 ng/dl achieved the same sensitivity (67%), specificity (91%), and diagnostic confidence (91%) as the best cutoff scores of plasma total cortisol (5 μ/dl) and plasma free cortisol (0.15 μ/dl). These results suggest that saliva cortisol, which directly reflects the biologically active fraction of cortisol, can be used as a reliable and more practical index in the DST, especially in outpatients.     

Comparison of plasma cortisol and corticosterone in the dexamethasone suppression test for melancholia

The suppression of plasma corticosterone (B), measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA), was compared to simultaneous suppression of plasma cortisol (F), measured as total corticoids by a competitive protein binding (CPB) assay, in the overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST). Baseline plasma B concentrations in IO control subjects were 4.04 ± 1.07 ng/ml (X ± S.D.) at 0800 hr and 1.51 ± 0.68 ng/ml at 1600 hr. Post-dexamethasone 1600 hr B levels in the controls were 0.46 ± 0.29 ng/ml. An early escape of plasma B (> 1.2 ng/ml), like that of F (> 5 μg/dl), during the overnight 24 hr 1.0 mg dose DST was noted in patients with melancholia (endogenous depression).Half-hourly catheter samples in a normal subject stimulated to escape from dexamethasone suppression showed that in general, plasma B concentrations parallel plasma F concentrations over a 12 hr period. Repeated weekly DSTs on two patients with different psychiatric diagnoses resulted in B: F correlations of 0.74 and 0.60. Overall agreement between B- and F-DST outcomes in all categories tested at 1600 and 2300 hr was 93%; the agreement in the melancholic and non-endogenous depressed groups was 100%.Post-dexamethasone, both B and F were suppressed 55–60% below the criterion level in controls. In those patients who escaped from dexamethasone suppression, the percentage increase in plasma B above the criterion level was significantly greater (+ 55%) than the corresponding percentage change in plasma F. Most patients with borderline abnormal F-DSTs (3.5–4.9 μg/dl) exhibited clearly abnormal B-DSTs (> 1.2 ng/ml). We conclude that the use of dexamethasone suppression of plasma B (using 1.2 ng/ml as the abnormal criterion value) is an additional indicator of an abnormal DST in depressed patients.     

Number of cortisol time-points and dexamethasone suppression test sensitivity for major depression

Failure to suppress cortisol secretion after administration of dexamethasone has been reported to be a diagnostic marker for major depression and to have prognostic implications when repeated after antidepressant treatment. The pulsatile pattern of cortisol secretion suggested to us that increasing the number of post-dexamethasone cortisol determinations might significantly increase the sensitivity of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for major depression. With a conventional two-point DST (1600 h and midnight), 5% of 20 normal volunteers, 8% of 13 inpatients with non-major depressions, and 31% of 65 inpatients with primary major depression failed to suppress. With six post-dexamethasone points (0800 h, 1200 h, 1600 h, 2000 h, 2200 h, midnight), the respective percentages were 10, 15 and 44%. The additional points increased the sensitivity from 31 to 44%, mostly by identifying more major depressives with a "late escape" pattern. If a clinician is using the DST to establish a marker for major depression that can be repeated to monitor response to treatment and the likelihood of relapse, then perhaps the increased sensitivity of the six-point DST would be helpful, despite a modest decrease in specificity from 94 to 88%.     

Plasma cortisol, the dexamethasone suppression test and depression in normal adult males

This study of 33 normal adult males investigated the nature of relationships between plasma cortisol levels and depression. Both plasma cortisol levels and responses to the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) have been shown to be associated with clinical depression. However, relatively few studies have investigated the utility of either plasma cortisol measures or the DST for evaluating emotional distress in subjects without demonstrable psychiatric morbidity. The results of this study suggest that the traditional DST has little discriminatory power when used with psychologically healthy subjects. Conversely, plasma cortisol was shown to be positively correlated with clinical personality characteristics associated with emotional distress, particularly depression. These data suggest the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal irregularities are not only associated with clinical psychopathology but may also be related to emotional reactivity in normal, asymptomatic individuals.     

Clinical utility of the dexamethasone suppression test assessed by plasma and salivary cortisol determinations

Concentrations of cortisol in saliva and plasma were compared in matched samples during a standard 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test. The study involved 185 routine psychiatric admissions, all of whom were classified according to DSM-III criteria. In a group of 122 matched samples of saliva and plasma, there was a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.867 and a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.869. Medication with anticholinergic side effects had little effect on the correlation and was not associated with major difficulties in salivary sampling due to "dry mouth." In a group of 178 diagnoses where both saliva and plasma were obtained, results were almost identical. Although nonsuppression was found in all psychiatric conditions, there was a very significant association with major depressive episode with melancholia.     

A longitudinal evaluation of dexamethasone and cortisol plasma concentrations in the dexamethasone suppression test before and during treatment with antidepressant drugs

Thirty depressed in- and outpatients received serial dexamethasone suppression tests (DSTs). Plasma dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations were drawn at 1600 on the day following a 1-mg oral dose of dexamethasone. The first DST was performed after patients were drug-free for a period of 1 week; the second, third, and fourth DSTs while patients received antidepressant medication. Dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations drawn in the drug-free period correlated significantly. The cortisol to dexamethasone ratio changed significantly with time in DST nonsuppressors, suggesting that nonsuppression is associated with an altered pharmacodynamic response of the hypothalamopituitary-adrenal axis to dexamethasone during depression. When dexamethasone concentrations from the drug-free period were compared with those drawn during antidepressant treatment, no significant differences were noted.     

Plasma dexamethasone concentrations and the dexamethasone suppression test

Altered bioavailability or altered pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone (dex) may contribute to a positive Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) in psychiatric patients. We measured plasma dex and plasma cortisol concentrations in 32 patients with primary major depressive disorder (MDD), 14 patients with other psychiatric disorders, and 16 normal controls. Cortisol was measured by the competitive protein binding (CPB) assay and dex by RIA (IgG Corp.). Additionally, cortisol was measured by a fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) available on the Abbott TDx analyzer in an attempt to validate this method for use in the DST. The agreement between FPIA and CPB cortisol results was excellent. Depressed nonsuppressors, by definition, had significantly higher mean plasma cortisol concentrations than depressed suppressors, psychiatric controls, and normal volunteers at 8:00 AM, 3:00 PM, and 10:00 PM postdex. When DST nonsuppressors and suppressors were compared regardless of diagnostic group, plasma dex concentrations were significantly lower (p less than 0.01) in the DST nonsuppressors. There was a significant negative correlation between plasma cortisol levels and plasma dex levels across all subjects at 8:00 AM (r = -0.365, n = 44, p less than 0.05). When the subjects were sorted by diagnostic category, there was a strong, but not statistically significant, trend toward lower plasma dex concentrations in the melancholic nonsuppressors versus the melancholic suppressors and between the psychiatric control non-suppressors and the corresponding suppressor group. These relationships disappeared when we restricted our analyses to an empirically derived middle range of plasma dex concentrations within which the DST results were considered to be valid. We conclude that bioavailability or pharmacokinetics of dex may significantly contribute to DST results. Further investigation is needed to determine whether or not the quantification of dex and its metabolites and their determination at which specific timepoints during the DST will enhance the predictive or interpretive value of the DST in psychiatric patients.     

Comparisons of plasma and salivary cortisol determinations for the diagnostic efficacy of the dexamethasone suppression test

The current status of the saliva dexamethasone suppression test (DST) is discussed and results from the literature reviewed. Evidence is presented that demonstrates that the efficacy of the salivary-based test is equal to that of the plasma DST provided that specifically developed radioimmunoassays are used for determination of salivary cortisol. Such evidence relied on measurement of cortisol in 300 matched samples of plasma and saliva provided by patients admitted to a routine psychiatric ward over a 2-year period. The results according to diagnosis (DSM-III categories) were in line with those generally reported. The influence of anticholinergic medication was examined: this had no significant effects on the performance of the plasma or salivary-based DST.     

Lithium augmentation increases post-dexamethasone cortisol in the dexamethasone suppression test in unipolar major depression

Although considerable evidence exists on the efficacy of lithium as an augmenting agent in refractory depression, the underlying neurobiology of this phenomenon is unknown. In patients with major depression, changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system have been detected by means of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), when administered during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. We investigated whether the DST also reveals alterations of the HPA system during lithium augmentation. We also sought to identify whether response to lithium augmentation can be predicted with the DST. Twenty-five patients with unipolar major depression, who did not respond to an adequate antidepressant monotherapy of at least 4 weeks, were measured for basal (pre-dexamethasone, 0800h) cortisol and ACTH levels and were administered the DST the day before initiation of lithium augmentation treatment. The same neuroendocrine procedures were repeated after 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria of response to lithium augmentation, defined as a reduction of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) score by > or =50% and an end point score of 9 or less, were determined by weekly HDRS ratings. The DST revealed a statistically significant increase of the post-dexamethasone cortisol values (P = 0.021) and an increase in the post-dexamethasone ACTH values (P = 0.051) during lithium augmentation as compared to pre-treatment baseline evaluations. The pre-dexamethasone hormone values were unchanged. The number of non-suppressors at baseline was one and increased to three at follow-up. Results of DST did not predict response to lithium augmentation, which occurred in 40% of subjects. Results suggest that lithium augmentation increases HPA system activity, as indicated by the increase of post-dexamethasone cortisol and ACTH levels measured by the DST. This is in contrast to the established decline of HPA system activity during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.     

Platelet serotonin, plasma cortisol, and dexamethasone suppression test in schizophrenic patients.

BACKGROUND: Serotonin (5-HT) regulates hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity. Abnormal response to the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and altered platelet 5-HT concentration have been shown in some schizophrenic patients. METHODS: Platelet 5-HT and plasma cortisol concentrations were determined simultaneously in 86 male schizophrenic patients before and after DST. Basal plasma cortisol and platelet 5-HT levels were also determined in 69 healthy male persons. RESULTS: Schizophrenic patients had higher plasma cortisol and platelet 5-HT concentrations than healthy persons. An abnormal escape from dexamethasone suppression was observed in 50% of patients. In these patients predexamethasone cortisol and platelet 5-HT concentrations were higher than in patients with normal DST. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that schizophrenic patients have the HPA axis dysregulation that could be connected with a disturbance in the 5-HT system.     

The dexamethasone and cortisol suppression test in depression: beta-endorphin as a useful marker

To investigate the mechanism underlying disturbances in hypothalamopituitary-adrenal (HPA) function in depressed patients, the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was compared with a cortisol suppression test (CST) and placebo treatment in depressed patients and control subjects. Plasma levels of cortisol, ACTH and beta-endorphin were assessed at 3 times during the day after treatment with a single dose of exogenous steroid. Both dexamethasone and cortisol treatment resulted in suppression of cortisol, ACTH and beta-endorphin in control subjects, while neither treatment had any effect on the hormone levels in those depressed patients who showed cortisol nonsuppression after dexamethasone. In the depressed patients who were cortisol suppressors after dexamethasone, cortisol treatment only slightly changed plasma levels of beta-endorphin, although they were suppressed after dexamethasone treatment. In addition, high levels of both cortisol and beta-endorphin were observed after placebo treatment in all depressed patients compared to control subjects, probably due to the absence of the normally occurring decrease of these hormones during the day in these patients. Cortisol treatment, but not dexamethasone treatment, discriminated depressed patients from controls with respect to their beta-endorphin plasma levels. However, it is not yet clear whether these different effects of the two steroids are related to a different mode of action of these steroids in depressed patients. beta-Endorphin seems to be a useful marker in detecting disturbances in HPA function among depressed patients.     

Situational depression and the dexamethasone suppression test

Neither baseline integrated 24 hr cortisol concentrations nor cortisol escape from dexamethasone suppression were able to distinguish a group of endogenously depressed patients who experienced precipitating events prior to their depression (situational) from a group of endogenously depressed patients with no discernible precipitating events (non-situational). Symptom severity, features of psychosis, and family history also were similar between the two groups. These results highlight the inadequacy of using the presence or absence of precipitating events for subtyping endogenous depression.     

Neuroendocrine aspects of primary endogenous depression: VI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the cortisol suppression index versus the dexamethasone suppression test in patients and matched controls

The cortisol suppression index (CSI), which is the ratio of the predexamethasone (DEX) serum cortisol concentration to the post-DEX cortisol concentration, has been investigated as an alternative means of analyzing the response of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis to DEX. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to examine the CSI versus the corresponding standard post-DEX cortisol values in a sample of 40 primary endogenous major depressives versus 40 matched normal control subjects who underwent a DEX suppression test (DST). The CSI was highly correlated with post-DEX cortisol values and showed no advantage in test performance over the standard DST across a wide range of criterion values. ROC analysis is a useful technique for determining the utility of the DST and other biological markers in psychiatry.     

Drug intake and the dexamethasone suppression test

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) is being used clinically as a diagnostic laboratory test for depression. Drug histories collected from 336 psychiatric inpatients revealed that 60% were taking one or more drugs suspected of altering DST results in either a false-positive or false-negative manner. Practical limitations of the DST as a biologic marker of affective syndromes in relation to patient drug use are discussed.