空腹血糖受损并糖耐量受损患者血管内皮功能及代谢功能观察

目的：观察空腹血糖受损并糖耐量受损（ IFG＋IGT）患者血管内皮功能及代谢功能情况。方法选择IFG＋IGT者72例（ E组）,其中非肥胖30例（ E1组）,肥胖42例（ E2组）;另选择糖耐量正常的健康人群142例（ N组）,其中非肥胖75例（ N1组）、肥胖67例（ N2组）。做口服葡萄糖耐量试验及胰岛素释放试验检测血糖、免疫活性胰岛素,同时检测空腹血脂、游离脂肪酸、脂联素。采用免疫比浊法检测超敏C反应蛋白（ hs-CRP）,RIA法检测血清内皮素（ SET）。留取晨尿,采用未抽提法测定内皮素（ UET）,散射比浊法检测尿微量白蛋白（ MUA）。观察血压和腰围。彩超测定肱动脉休息时、加压及服用硝酸甘油后的内径变化,计算内皮依赖性血管舒张功能（ EDD）及内皮非依赖性血管舒张功能（ EID）指标（ΔD％、ΔD1％）。结果校正性别、年龄后,E和N组比较、E2与N2组比较及E1与N1组比较,MUA、hs-CRP、UET、SET、ΔD％、ΔD1％差异有统计学意义（P均＜0．05）;N2与N1组比较hs-CRP、UET和SET差异有统计学意义（P均＜0．05）;E2与E1组比较MUA、hs-CRP、UET和SET差异有统计学意义（P均＜0．05）。结论 IFG＋IGT患者大血管和微血管内皮功能均出现异常,尤以肥胖者为著;患者的代谢功能亦出现异常,主要表现为高血压、高血糖、脂代谢紊乱、胰岛素抵抗及胰岛分泌功能下降。     

空腹血糖受损与糖耐量减低的区别

1979年美国国家糖尿病资料组提出糖耐量减低（IGT）这个概念。1985年WHO将FPG〈7．0mmol／L，2hPG≥7．8mmol／L且〈11．1mmol／L作为IGT的一种临床分型。1997年美国糖尿病学会（ADA）提出了IFG，即FPG≥6．1mmol／L且〈7．1mmol／L同时2hPG〈7．8mmol／L的概念。1999年WHO提出的IFG和IGT的定义和诊断标准与ADA相同，且提出IFG的另一意思是非糖尿病性空腹高血糖状态。2003年ADA将IFG的FPG下调为5．6mmol／L。IFG与IGT都是指患者的血糖介于正常人与糖尿病患者血糖水平之间的一种中间代谢状态，有人将其称之为糖尿病（DM）前期（prediabetes），也称为糖调节受损（IGR），因此IGR包括IFG和IGT两种状态。我们复习相关文献，将IFG和IGT的主要区别总结如下。     

糖耐量受损患者肱动脉内皮依赖性血管舒张功能变化的研究

采用高分辨血管外超声检测糖耐量受损(IGT)患者肱动脉血流介导的内皮依赖性血管舒张功能(EDD)和硝酸甘油介导的内皮非依赖性血管舒张功能(EID)。IGT组EDD明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。EID在两组间无明显差异(P>0.05)。     

空腹糖耐量受损及空腹血糖偏低和老年人轻度认知障碍的关系探讨

目的探讨轻度认知障碍(MCI)风险与血糖代谢异常的相关性,并为MCI的预防提供依据。方法本研究对1074例认知功能正常且无糖尿病、高脂血症、痛风的老年门诊患者进行了调查。随访5年,根据简易智力状态检查量表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)进行认知功能评估,有121例受试者被诊断出患有MCI。此外,监测受试者每年血糖、糖化血红蛋白。结果入组的1074例受试者根据认知功能的不同分为MCI组和非MCI组,与非MCI组相比,MCI组中空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、三酰甘油(TG)和总胆固醇(TC)的平均值更高(均P<0.05)。在高血糖组中,FBG的临界值为6.2 mmol/L(敏感性=84.1%,特异性=90.9%,曲线下面积=0.875,P<0.001);在低血糖组中,FBG的临界值为4.5 mmol/L(灵敏性=77.4%,特异性=87.3%,曲线下面积=0.823,P<0.001)。HbA1c的临界值为5.5%(敏感性=76.0%,特异性=87.0%,曲线下面积=0.815,P<0.001)。多元Logistic回归分析MCI的风险增加与空腹血糖平均值<4.5 mmol/L和≥6.2 mmol/L(RR:1.69,95%CI:1.11~2.59;RR:1.81,95%CI:1.15~2.86)以及糖化血红蛋白平均值≥5.5%(RR:2.13,95%CI:1.51~2.99)相关。结论空腹糖耐量受损及空腹血糖偏低是老年人MCI发生风险的独立危险因素。     

空腹血糖受损与糖耐量受损者胰岛β细胞功能及胰岛素抵抗的比较

对231例糖耐量正常（NGT），40例空腹血糖受损（IFG），196例糖耐量受损（IGT）和45例IGT兼有IFG的病例研究显示，IFG（FPG≥6．1mmol／L）组的胰岛素分泌缺欠和胰岛素抵抗比IGT组更严重；IGT组中仅19％例出现IFG。     

空腹血糖受损、糖耐量受损人群2年自然转归及其影响因素的研究

目的探讨空腹血糖受损(IFG)、糖耐量受损(IGT)人群发生糖尿病的危险性及其影响因素.方法对1999年7月～12月包钢集团公司2万余人糖尿病普查中IFG、IGT患者730人于2001年9～11月进行随访调查.测量身高、体重、腰围、血压,作过夜空腹75 g葡萄糖耐量试验,同时测定空腹胰岛素(FINS)及服糖后2 h胰岛素(PINS),血总胆固醇(TC),甘油三酯(TG),高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C).结果随访的656人中138人发生糖尿病.其中孤立性IFG(I-IFG)糖尿病年转变率为5.1%,孤立性(I-IGT)为11.5%,IGT为14.0%,IFG/IGT为20.2%.I-IGT、IGT及IFG/IGT糖尿病年转变率明显高于I-IFG(均P＜0.001).与I-IFG比较,I-IGT发生糖尿病的危险比为2.65,IFG/IGT为5.96.I-IFG转归为糖尿病的危险因素主要是年龄(OR 1.05)和BMI(OR 1.03).I-IGT是2h血糖(OR 2.02)、家族史(OR 2.19)及腰围(OR 1.08).各项临床指标2年的变化结果转归为I-IFG、I-IGT者2年前后的年龄、体重、腰围、BMI、血压、TC均值及其肥胖、腹型肥胖、血脂代谢紊乱、高血压的患病率均比NGT转归组高;I-IFG与I-IGT比较差异无显著性.结论 I-IGT发生糖尿病的危险性明显高于I-IFG,主要危险因素为腰围、餐后血糖、家族史.I-IFG发生糖尿病的危险因素则是年龄、BMI.故对IGT应给予积极的干预治疗,而对于IFG应定期随访.     

空腹血糖受损患者糖耐量异常及影响因素分析

目的了解空腹血糖受损(IFG)患者糖耐量异常(IGT)情况及其影响因素。方法纳入空腹血糖为5.6~6.1 mmol/L的IFG患者337例,检测患者口服75克葡萄糖后2小时血糖等资料,分析患者IGT情况及其影响因素。结果纳入的337例IFG患者中46.6%(157/337)伴有IGT。口服葡萄糖耐量异常和正常组超重和肥胖率分别为75.0%和63.1%(P0.05);口服葡萄糖耐量异常组甘油三酯水平显著高于正常组,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平低于正常组,均有统计学差异(P0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、体重指数、甘油三酯水平是IFG患者葡萄糖耐量异常的影响因素,相对危险分别为:1.06(95%CI:1.03~1.08);1.11(95%CI:1.05~119);1.58(95%CI:1.23~2.09)。进一步对体重正常者发生糖耐量异常的影响因素进行分析,除年龄外,甘油三酯水平是空腹血糖受损患者糖耐量异常的影响因素,相对危险为2.10(95%CI:1.29~3.43)。结论空腹血糖受损患者约半数伴有糖耐量异常,体重指数和甘油三酯水平是空腹血糖受损患者糖耐量异常的影响因素。     

下调空腹血糖切点对诊断空腹血糖受损合理性的评估

广东省佛山市2512名20-94岁职工进行75gOGTT筛查研究显示，空腹血糖（FPG）5．51mmol／L是预测糖尿病的最佳切点，其敏感性和特异性均为80％。FPG5．15mmol／L是预测糖耐量减低（IGT）的最佳切点。因此，降低空腹血糖受损（IFG）的切点是合理的、有临床意义的。     

空腹血糖受损诊断标准下调的合理性分析

目的　探讨空腹血糖受损 (IFG)诊断点从 6.1mmol/L下调至 5 .6mmol/L的合理性。方法对1986年入选的 468名非糖尿病人群〔3 41例正常糖耐量 (NGT) ,12 7例糖耐量受损 (IGT)〕在 1988年 ,1990年和 1992年分别进行OGTT复查 ,测定空腹血糖 (FPG)及 2h血糖 (2hPG)。以COX模型分析不同基线血糖水平增加糖尿病的风险。结果　 (1) 10 9例 6年后发生糖尿病。COX成比例风险模型分析校正年龄、性别、体重指数 (BMI)影响后发现FPG与 2型糖尿病发病显著相关 (P =0 .0 0 0 1)。基线FPG 5 .6～ 6.0mmol/L组糖尿病发病危险性比FPG <5 .6mmol/L组已显著增加 ,RR为 3 .3 (95 %CI 2 .0～ 5 .3 ,P =0 .0 0 0 1)。 (2 )受试者工作特征 (ROC)曲线分析FPG预测糖尿病发病的最佳阈值是 5 .6mmol/L ,以FPG 5 .6mmol/L为诊断点IFG预报糖尿病发病的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值分别为 45 .0 % ,92 .8%和 65 .3 %。 (3 )NGT个体中COX成比例风险模型校正年龄、性别、BMI后显示 ,FPG分组 (5 .0～ 6.0mmol/L与 <5 .0mmol/L)与糖调节受损 (IGR ,包括IFG或IGT)发生显著正相关 (P =0 .0 0 7)。ROC曲线显示 ,FPG预测糖耐量恶化而进展为DM或IGR的最佳阈值为 5 .3mmol/L。结论　 (1)本组非糖尿病人群中FPG预测糖尿病发病的最佳阈值为 5 .6mmol/L     

Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance in urban population in India.

AIMS: To study prevalence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in urban Indians and their demographic and anthropometric characteristics. METHODS: Data on capillary blood glucose (OGTT), anthropometric and demography details were available in 10 025 subjects (M : F 4711 : 5314) aged > or = 20 years. Glucose tolerance was categorized as normal, isolated IFG, isolated IGT, IFG + IGT and diabetes using the fasting and 2-h blood glucose (2hBG; 75-g glucose load) values. Subjects with known diabetes were excluded. RESULTS: Age-standardized prevalences of IFG, IGT and newly detected diabetes were 8.7%, 8.1% and 13.9%, respectively. IFG was more prevalent in women (9.8%) than in men (7.4%) (chi2 = 13.62, P = 0.0002), while the gender differences in IGT (men 8.4%, women 7.9%) and diabetes (men 13.3%, women 14.3%) were not significant. Body mass index and waist circumference were higher in glucose-intolerant groups than in normal glucose tolerance (NGT). Prevalence of diabetes, IGT and IFG + IGT increased with age. Among the IFG, 4% had diabetes and 27.1% had IGT using 2hBG criteria. In IFG, the fasting and 2hBG values were not correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalences of IFG and IGT were similar in urban Indians and an overlap occurred in only less than half of these subjects. IFG was more common in women. Subjects with IFG were older and had more adverse anthropometric characteristics in comparison with NGT. IFG did not show an increasing trend with age.     

Differences in insulin resistance and pancreatic B‐cell function in obese subjects with isolated impaired glucose tolerance and isolated impaired fasting glucose

Aims To investigate changes in insulin action and insulin secretion in obese subjects with different categories of impaired glucose regulation (IGR): impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and combined IFG/IGT (CGI). Methods A total of 222 subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT); 100 had normal glucose tolerance (subdivided into 32 lean NGT, 68 obese NGT), and 122 were obese with IGR (82 IGT, 14 IFG and 26 CGI). The insulin sensitivity index (S_I) was assessed by Bergman's minimal model method with FSIGTT; insulin secretion was determined by acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg). The disposition index (DI), the product of AIRg and S_I, was used to determine whether AIRg was adequate to compensate for insulin resistance. Results S_I was similar in NGT and IGR obese subgroups. AIRg was significantly increased in obese NGT as compared with lean NGT, significantly reduced in IGT, and further reduced in IFG and CGI subjects as compared with obese NGT subgroups. DI was reduced in NGT obese individuals. Within the obese IGR subgroups, IFG and CGI subjects had even lower DI value than IGT subjects. Conclusions Obese Chinese subjects with IGR have a similar degree of insulin resistance but differ in insulin secretion. Subjects with IFG and CGI have a more prominent deficiency in insulin secretion than subjects with IGT.     

红细胞体积分布宽度与糖代谢异常/糖耐量异常和糖尿病相关

目的探讨红细胞体积分布宽度（RDW）与2型糖尿病（T2DM）、空腹血糖受损／葡萄糖耐量异常（IFG／IGT）的相互关系。方法对152例在我院定期进行健康体检或治疗的患者,依据血糖情况分为3组,其中T2DM组42例,IFG／IGT组38例,正常对照（NGT）组72例,采取空腹血,采用全自动血液分析仪测定RDW、血红蛋白,多功能血生化自动分析仪测定血总胆固醇、三酰甘油、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、血肌酐、血尿素氮和空腹血糖,同时统计高血压、冠心病的发病率并分析其关系。结果RDW在T2DM组、IFG／IGT组和NGT组之间比较具有统计学差异,其中T2DM组和NGT组、IFG／IGT组比较,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）,IFG／IGT组与NGT组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。多因素直线回归分析显示空腹血糖（P〈0．01）和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇（P〈0．05）是RDW的独立危险因子。结论T2DM患者RDW升高,RDW的变化与空腹血糖水平相关。     

Gender differences in the prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance in Mauritius. Does sex matter?

OBJECTIVE: To examine gender differences in the characteristics and prevalence of various categories of glucose tolerance in a population study in Mauritius. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 1998, a community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in Mauritius. Categories of glucose metabolism were determined in 5388 adults, with an oral glucose tolerance test given to those who did not have previously diagnosed diabetes (n=4036). Other cardiovascular risk factors were assessed among those without known diabetes. RESULTS: For men and women the prevalence of diabetes (22.0 vs. 21.8%, respectively) and the prevalence of coexisting impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (3.2 vs. 2.9%) were similar. However, men were twice as likely as women to have isolated IFG [5.1% (4.2-6.0) vs. 2.9% (2.3-3.5)], despite being younger, thinner and with lower plasma insulin but higher lipids. Conversely, the prevalence of isolated IGT was lower in men [9.0% (7.9-10.2) vs. 13.9% (12.6-15.1)]. Among non-diabetic individuals, fasting glucose was higher in men than women, whereas 2-h glucose was higher in women. In people without diabetes, women had significantly higher body mass index, beta cell function (HOMA-B), fasting and 2-h insulin than men and significantly lower waist-hip ratios, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S) and triglycerides. CONCLUSION: In Mauritius, the distribution of impaired glucose metabolism differs by sex. The observation that IFG is more prevalent in men and IGT more prevalent in women raises important questions about their underlying aetiology and the ability of the current glucose thresholds to equally identify men and women at high-risk of developing diabetes. IFG should be seen as a complimentary category of abnormal glucose tolerance, rather than a replacement for IGT.     

Progression to clinically diagnosed and treated diabetes from impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycaemia.

AIMS: To evaluate the risk of diabetes in subjects with impaired fasting glycemia (IFG) as compared with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and normal glucose tolerance. METHODS: Men (1223) and women (1370) aged 45-64 years and free of diabetes at baseline were followed-up for 10 years, with 26 737 person years accumulated. The incident diabetic cases were identified through the national Drug Register and the Hospital Discharge Register. RESULTS: During the 10 years of follow-up, 53 (4.3%) men and 47 (3.4%) women developed diabetes. IFG alone defined 22 (15.5/1000 person years) diabetic cases, which was higher than for subjects with normal fasting glucose. Subjects with isolated IGT identified an additional 34 cases (155% more) which could not be defined by IFG alone. The area under the ROC curve was larger for 2-h glucose (0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.82) than for fasting glucose (0.65, 0.58-0.71). The multivariate adjusted Cox hazard ratio was higher for isolated IGT (3.9, 95% CI 2.4-6.2) than for isolated IFG (2.3, 0.9-5.7) as compared with subjects with neither IFG nor IGT. CONCLUSION: Both IFG and IGT are risk predictors for diabetes, but IGT defines a much larger target population for prevention.     

High incidence of type 2 diabetes and increasing conversion rates from impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance to diabetes in Mauritius

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of different stages of glucose intolerance in a population from Mauritius followed over 11 years. RESEARCH DESIGN, METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Population-based surveys were undertaken in the multi-ethnic nation of Mauritius in 1987, 1992 and 1998 with 5083, 6616 and 6291 participants, respectively. Questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test were included. Three cohorts aged between 25 and 79 years with classifiable glucose tolerance data were identified; 3680 between 1987 and 1992, 4178 between 1992 and 1998, and 2631 between 1987 and 1998. Glucose tolerance was classified according to WHO 1999 criteria. RESULTS: The incidence rate of type 2 diabetes was higher between 1992 and 1998 than between 1987 and 1992. In men, the incidence was similar between cohorts (24.5 and 25.4 per 1000 person-years) whereas the incidence increased in women (23.3 and 16.4 per 1000 person-years). The incidence of diabetes peaked in the 45-54 year age group and then plateaued or fell. The incidences of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) decreased in both men and women. Of normoglycaemic subjects at baseline, more women than men developed IGT and more men than women developed IFG. Of those labelled as IFG in 1987, 38% developed diabetes after 11 years. The corresponding figure for IGT was 46%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we report changes in incidence rates of glucose intolerance over a 11-year period. In particular, differences between men and women were observed. The increased incidence of IGT in women compared with men, and increased incidence of IFG in men compared with women was consistent with, and explains the sex biases seen in the prevalences of these states.     

Psychosocial factors are independent risk factors for the development of Type 2 diabetes in Japanese workers with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance1

Aims We prospectively studied Japanese workers with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and analysed possible risk factors for diabetes, including psychosocial factors such as stress. Methods The participants were 128 male Japanese company employees (mean age, 49.3 ± 5.9 years) with IFG and/or IGT diagnosed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Participants were prospectively studied for 5 years with annual OGTTs. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox's proportional hazard model were used to analyse the incidence of diabetes and the factors affecting glucose tolerance, including anthropometric, biochemical and social–psychological factors. Results Of 128 participants, 36 (28.1%) developed diabetes and 39 (30.5%) returned to normal glucose tolerance (NGT) during a mean follow‐up of 3.2 years. Independent risk factors for diabetes were night duty [hazard ratio (HR) = 5.48, P = 0.002], higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels within 6.1–6.9 mmol/l (HR = 1.05, P = 0.031), stress (HR = 3.81, P = 0.037) and administrative position (HR = 12.70, P = 0.045), while independent factors associated with recovery were lower FPG levels (HR = 0.94, P = 0.017), being a white‐collar worker (HR = 0.34, P = 0.033), non‐smoking (HR = 0.31, P = 0.040) and lower serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (HR = 0.97, P = 0.042). Conclusions In addition to FPG levels at baseline, psychosocial factors (night duty, stress and administrative position) are risk factors for Type 2 diabetes, while being a white‐collar worker, a non‐smoker and lower serum ALT levels are factors associated with return to NGT in Japanese workers with IFG and/or IGT.