Dispersion of refractoriness in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Evaluation with simultaneous endocardial recordings from both atria

This article studies the role of dispersion of atrial refractoriness (DAR) in the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). A 20-polar Halo catheter or a 40-polar basket catheter was placed in the right atrium and a 10-polar catheter in the coronary sinus in 21 patients with paroxysmal AF. Bipolar electrograms during AF were recorded from 7 to 16 sites in both atria. As control, electrograms during AF induced by extra-stimulation or burst pacing were also recorded from 4 to 14 sites in both atria in 12 patients with supraventricular tachycardias but without history of AF. The local atrial fibrillation intervals (AFI) during a period of 10 s or 20 s were measured and the mean, median and the 5th, 10th and 15th percentile AFIs at each site were calculated as estimates of the local effective refractory period (AERP). The maximum dispersion and variance of the estimated AERP among the 7-16/4-14 sites were used as measures of the DAR. The maximum dispersion and variance of the 5th and 10th percentile AFIs were significantly greater in the AF group than those in the control group, which were mainly due to the shortening of the minimum 5th and 10th percentile AFIs. No significant differences in dispersion and variance of the mean and median AFIs were shown between the 2 groups. The dispersion and variance of atrial refractoriness during AF estimated from the measurement of short AFIs were significantly greater in patients with paroxysmal AF than in those without clinical AF. The increased dispersion of refractoriness in patients with AF was mainly due to the shortening of the minimum AFIs. These findings suggest the involvement of an increased dispersion of atrial refractoriness in the genesis of paroxysmal AF.     

Intravenous sotalol decreases transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans: assessment of the electrophysiological effects by biatrial basket electrodes

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to assess the effects of sotalol on the transthoracic cardioversion energy requirement for chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and on the atrial electrograms during AF recorded by two basket electrodes. BACKGROUND: The effects of sotalol infusion on transthoracic electrical cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation in humans have not been well investigated. METHODS: We included 18 patients with persistent AF for more than three months. Atrial electrograms were recorded by two basket electrodes positioned in each atrium respectively. Transthoracic cardioversion was performed before and after sotalol 1.5 mg/kg i.v. infusion. RESULTS: In the 14 patients whose AF could be terminated by cardioversion before sotalol infusion, the atrial defibrillation energy was significantly reduced after sotalol infusion (236 +/- 74 jules [J] vs. 186 +/- 77 J; p < 0.01). Atrial fibrillation was refractory to cardioversion in four patients at baseline and was converted to sinus rhythm by cardioversion after sotalol infusion in two of them. We further divided the patients into two groups. Group A consisted of 10 patients in whom the energy requirement was decreased by sotalol while group B consisted of eight patients in whom the energy requirement was not decreased. The mean A-A (atrial local electrogram) intervals during AF were significantly increased after sotalol infusion in both groups, but the increment of A-A interval was significantly larger in group A than it was in group B patients (36 +/- 13 ms vs. 22 +/- 8 ms for the right atrium; 19 +/- 7 ms vs. 9 +/- 7 ms for the left atrium; both p < 0.05). The spatial and temporal dispersions of A-A intervals were not significantly changed after sotalol infusion in both atria in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sotalol decreases the atrial defibrillation energy requirement by increasing atrial refractoriness but not by decreasing the dispersion of refractoriness.     

Right atrial modification of maze surgery does not affect refractoriness and conduction patterns of human lone atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Tissue mass and structure are relevant for initiation and persistence of fibrillation. Modification of the right atrium during maze surgery may change the arrhythmogenic substrate of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Epicardial mapping was performed in 9 patients undergoing unmodified maze III surgery for lone paroxysmal AF. Simultaneous recording of AF on the right and left atrium was carried out with two spoon-electrodes each harbouring 64 terminals. Activation maps of AF were made to study AF wavelet organization. The recording position on right and left atria was outside the surgical field and remained unchanged before and after surgery. Before surgery, mean right and left fibrillatory intervals were 174+/-23 ms, and 175+/-26 ms, respectively, and did not differ. After completed right atrial surgery, these fibrillary intervals remained unchanged. Mean right and left atrial dispersion of refractoriness (expressed as the coefficient of variation) were 4.2+/-0.8 and 5.2+/-3.8 ms. Only right atrial dispersion of refractoriness increased significantly after right-sided surgery. Prior to surgery, activation patterns of the left atrium were more complex than that of the right atrium. The left activation patterns became less complex afterwards; the right atrial activation patterns did not change. CONCLUSION: The right atrial modification of maze III surgery neither affects atrial refractoriness during human lone AF nor changes AF wavelet organization. Thus, right atrial surgery does not modify the arrhythmogenic substrate of AF. These findings may imply that maze surgery can be restricted to the left atrium.     

Electrophysiologic Characteristics of a Dilated Atrium in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

This study investigated the difference of atrial electrophysiologic characteristics between a normal and dilated atrium and compared them among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter. Twenty-seven patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 28 patients with paroxysmal atrial flutter were divided into four subgroups, according to the presence of a normal atrium or bilateral atrial enlargement. Thirty patients without atrial arrhythmia (20 patients with normal atrium and 10 patients with bilateral atrial enlargement) were included in control group. The atrial refractoriness in patients with a dilated atrium was longer than those with normal atrial size. In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and patients of control group, the P-wave duration and interatrial conduction velocity with or without atrial enlargement were similar. However, in patients with paroxysmal atrial flutter, P-A_PCS (86 ± 10 ms vs. 73 ± 9 ms, p < 0.05) and P-A_DCS (109 ± 9 ms vs. 95 ± 9 ms, p < 0.05) in patients with a dilated atrium were longer than in patients with a normal atrium. The patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter all demonstrated longer P-wave duration and interatrial conduction time than control group. Among the groups with a normal atrium or a dilated atrium, atrial refractoriness in patients with paroxysmal atrial flutter was shorter than that in control group. Moreover, in the patients with a normal atrium, the potential minimal wavelength in control group (6.6 ± 1.7) was longer than that of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (5.3 ± 1.1), or atrial flutter (5.0 ± 1.2). These findings suggest that atrial electrophysiologic characteristics of a dilated atrium were different from those of normal atrium, and these changes were different between paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter. Multiple factors are considered to be related to the genesis of atrial tachyarrhythmias.     

Increased dispersion and shortened refractoriness caused by verapamil in chronic atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the effect ofverapamil on atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length and spatial dispersion of refractoriness in patients with chronic AF. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that verapamil prevents acute remodeling by AF. The effects of verapamil in chronic AF are unknown. METHODS: During electrophysiologic study in 15 patients with chronic AF (duration >1 year), 12 unipolar electrograms were recorded from right atrial free wall, right atrial appendage and coronary sinus, along with monophasic action potential recordings from the right atrial appendage. The mean fibrillatory interval at each atrial recording site was used as an index for local refractoriness. Dispersion of refractoriness was calculated as the standard deviation of all local mean fibrillatory intervals expressed as a percentage of the overall mean fibrillatory interval. After baseline measurements, verapamil (0.075 mg/kg intravenous in 10 min) was infused and the measurements were repeated. RESULTS: After administration ofverapamil, mean fibrillatory intervals shortened by a mean of 16.6 +/- 3.3 ms (p < 0.001) at the right free wall, 15.0 +/- 3.5 ms (p < 0.001) at the appendage and 17.1 +/- 3.2 ms (p < 0.01) in the coronary sinus. Monophasic action potential duration decreased by 15.9 +/- 4.0 ms (p < 0.01). Dispersion of refractoriness increased in all patients from 3.8 +/- 0.8 to 5.1 +/- 1.8 (p < 0.001). A strong correlation between mean fibrillatory intervals and action potential duration was found, both before and after verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: Verapamil caused shortening of refractoriness and increase in spatial dispersion of refractoriness in patients with chronic AF. This implies that verapamil is not useful in reversing the remodeling process in these patients.     

The Spatial Dispersion of Atrial Refractoriness and Atrial Fibrillation Vulnerability

The local dispersion of conduction and refractoriness has been considered essential for induction of atrial arrhythmias. This study sought to determine whether a difference of refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation between trabeculated and smooth as well as high and low right atrium may contribute to initiation of atrial fibrillation in dogs.In 14 healthy mongrel dogs weighing 22.4 ± 1 kg, closed-chest endocardial programmed stimulation was performed from four distinct right atrial sites. Atrial refractory periods and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation or premature atrial complexes were determined during a basic cycle length of 400 and 300 ms and an increasing pacing current strength.For a pacing cycle length of 300ms, atrial refractory periods were longer on the smooth, as compared to the trabeculated right atrium (102 ± 25 vs. 97 ± 17ms, p < 0.05), whereas for a pacing cycle length of 400ms, there was no significant difference. The duration of the vulnerability zone for induction of atrial fibrillation was longer on the smooth right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (40 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 22 ms; p < 0.05) and 300 ms (33 ± 25 vs. 23 ± 21 ms; p < 0.01). When comparing high and low right atrium, refractory periods were longer on the the low right atrium, for a cycle length of both 400 ms (111 ± 23 vs. 94 ± 24ms; p < 0.01) and 300 ms (104 ± 20 vs. 96 ± 23ms; p < 0.01). For a pacing cycle length of 300 ms, the duration of the atrial fibrillation vulnerability zone was longer for the high, as compared to the low right atrium (34 ± 22 vs. 22 ± 22, p < 0.01). Seven dogs with easily inducible episodes of atrial fibrillation demonstrated significantly shorter refractory periods as compared to 7 non-vulnerable dogs, regardless of pacing site and current strength.In conclusion, significant differences in refractoriness and vulnerability for induction of atrial fibrillation can be observed in the area of the crista terminalis in healthy dogs. Thus, local anatomic factors may play a role in the initiation of atrial fibrillation.     

Dispersion of atrial repolarization in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

To study the role of the dispersion of atrial repolarization (DAR) in the genesis of atrial fibrillation (AF), monophasic action potentials (MAP) were recorded simultaneously from a catheter at the high lateral right atrium (HLRA) and a catheter moving around the high, middle and low lateral right atrium (RA) the high, anterior and posterior septal RA and the RA appendage in 15 patients with paroxysmal AF and 15 patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) or concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) without history of AF. After recordings during sinus rhythm (SR), MAPs were recorded during programmed stimulation (PS) via the HLRA catheter at a drive cycle length (CL) of 500 ms. Thus, MAPs were recorded simultaneously from 2 sites at a time and sequentially from 4 to 12 sites during SR, drive pacing and PS. Taking the MAP at the HLRA as reference, the dispersion of repolarization time (dispersion of RT) and its two components, the dispersions of activation time (dispersion of AT) and MAP duration (dispersion of MAP duration) among the 4 to 12 sites were calculated and taken as parameters of DAR. RESULTS: During SR and PS, the maximal dispersion of RT was significantly greater in AF than in control patients, 113+/-49 ms vs 50+/-28 ms (P<0.001) and 114+/-56 vs 70+/-43 ms (P<0.05) respectively. The increased dispersion of RT in the AF group was caused by increases in both dispersion of MAP duration and dispersion of AT. CONCLUSION: During SR and PS, DAR increased in patients with paroxysmal AF due to increases in dispersion of MAP duration and dispersion of AT, which suggests the involvement of both repolarization and conduction disturbances in the development of paroxysmal AF.     

Monophasic action potentials of the right atrium in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

To investigate the mechanism of atrial fibrillation (AF), monophasic action potentials (MAPs) from the atrial myocardium were studied in 7 patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) and in 7 control individuals. The MAPs were recorded using a contact catheter during sinus rhythm and continuous pacing at the high right atrium (HRA) with pacing cycle lengths of 600, 500 and 400 ms. MAPs were obtained from 6 sites in each participant. The MAPD90 was measured from onset to 90% of MAP repolarization. Average, maximal and minimal MAPD90 (avMAPD90, maxMAPD90 and minMAPD90) were obtained from all participants. The dispersion of MAPD90 (dispMAPD90) was defined as the difference between maxMAPD90 and minMAPD90. The width of each atrial potential (WAP) and the wavelength index (WLI=MAPD90/WAP) were determined. Average, maximal and minimal WLI (avWLI, maxWLI and minWLI) were obtained from all participants. The avMAPD90 and maxMAPD90 did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The minMAPD90 in the PAF group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at HRA pacing with cycle lengths of 500 and 400 ms (210+/-18ms vs 245+/-14 ms, p<0.05; 207+/-23 ms vs 238+/-20 ms, p<0.05; respectively). The dispMAPD90 was significantly longer in the PAF group than in the control group during sinus and HRA pacing. The WAP value did not differ between the 2 groups. The minWLI in the PAF group was significantly smaller than that in the control group at HRA pacing with cycle lengths of 500 and 400 ms (3.3+/-0.5 vs 3.8+/-0.3, p<0.05; 3.2+/-0.4 vs 3.7+/-0.3, p<0.02). A shortened and widened dispersion of atrial refractoriness may play an important role in the genesis of AF. Furthermore, smaller wavelengths may form in the atrium of patients with PAF.     

阵发性心房颤动患者心房及肺静脉不应期离散度的变化

目的探讨阵发性房颤患者房颤相关组织的电生理特性改变情况。方法选取阵发性房颤患者10例(房颤组)和无房颤病史的左侧旁路有显性预激波患者15例(对照组)。将大头电极分别放置在两组患者左上肺静脉、左下肺静脉、右上肺静脉、右下肺静脉开口及左心房顶壁、前壁、后壁、高位右心房,分别测定各部位有效不应期(EPR)。结果①房颤组心房及肺静脉EPR离散度指数(DI)为0.117±0.028,对照组为0.074±0.029,两组比较,P<0.05。②房颤组左心房ERP为(234.00±28.72)ms,肺静脉ERP为(230.75±32.69)ms;对照组左心房ERP为(248.00±25.99)ms,肺静脉ERP为(244.33±26.78)ms,两组比较,P均<0.05。结论阵发性房颤患者DI明显增大,左心房、肺静脉ERP显著缩短。     

Atrial electrophysiologic properties in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Study conducted with the stimulation of 5 atrial sites

Programmed atrial stimulation at five atrial sites was performed to evaluate electrophysiologic atrial properties in 17 control patients (14 M, 3F, mean age 61 +/- 9 years) (Group A) and in 18 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (13 M, 5 F, mean age 61 +/- 5 years) (Group B) with normal sinus node function. The mean value of the P wave duration was similar in both groups. Programmed atrial stimulation was performed at five atrial sites: high, medium and low lateral wall, and high and low medial wall. We evaluated the following parameters: A) local conduction delay measured at the functional refractory period as the difference between A1-A2 and S1-S2 intervals; B) widening of local electrogram measured at the functional refractory period as the difference between A1-A2 interval measured at the end of each local electrogram and A1-A2 interval measured at the beginning of each local electrogram. We evaluated the mean and the maximum value of the two above-mentioned parameters; C) dispersion of effective refractory period and functional refractory period, determined as the longest minus the shortest refractory period from the range of refractory periods measured in each patient; D) the mean of effective refractory periods and functional refractory periods observed at five atrial sites. Mean and maximum local conduction delay, mean effective and functional refractory periods did not present significant differences in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prolonged fractionation of paced right atrial electrograms in patients with atrial flutter and fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the extent of fractionation of paced right atrial electrograms in patients with and without paroxysmal atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Slow conduction through nonuniform anisotropic atrial muscles, represented by fractionated electrograms, may favor the generation of atrial tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: This study included 10 control patients (Group 1), 8 patients with documented paroxysmal AFL (Group 2) and 10 patients with documented paroxysmal AF (Group 3). Five electrode catheters were placed in the different sites of the right atrium and one catheter was positioned at the coronary sinus ostium. Atrial pacing from one site was done by a constant drive train with an extrastimulus inserted every fourth beat while recording at the other five sites was performed. The delay of each fractionated potential in the high-pass filtered atrial electrogram in response to extrastimulation was determined and used to construct conduction curves of delay versus the S1S2 interval. RESULTS: The mean increase in electrogram duration between a coupling interval of 350 ms and 10 ms above atrial refractoriness was significantly greater in Groups 2 and 3 compared with that in Group 1 (8.5 +/- 2.5 vs. 11.0 +/- 2.7 vs. 5.9 +/- 2.3 ms, respectively, p < 0.001). The mean S1S2 interval at which delay increased suddenly was also longer in Groups 2 and 3 compared with Group 1 (326 +/- 9 vs. 343 +/- 12 vs. 307 +/- 17 ms, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Increased delays in the individual potential of the fractionated atrial electrograms may be related to the development of AFL and AF.     

Role of dispersion of atrial refractoriness in the recurrence of clinical atrial fibrillation; a manifestation of atrial electrical remodelling in humans?

AIMS: The mechanism of atrial fibrillation recurrence following cardioversion is unknown, although experimental studies have indicated that changes in dispersion of atrial refractoriness may play a role. The aims of this study were to assess (1) if dispersion of atrial refractoriness is relevant to atrial fibrillation recurrence and (2) if dispersion of refractoriness is part of the atrial electrical remodelling process in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients underwent internal cardioversion (CV1) of persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were monitored by daily transtelephonic recordings following discharge and if there was spontaneous atrial fibrillation recurrence they were rapidly admitted for repeat cardioversion (CV2). We used the 5th percentile of 100 consecutive atrial fibrillation cycle lengths (AFCL(P5)) and the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) as measures of atrial refractoriness at four different atrial sites. Dispersion of AFCL(P5)at CV1 was significantly higher in those who had subsequent recurrence of atrial fibrillation than in those who remained in sinus rhythm for at least 1 month after cardioversion (35+/-17 ms vs 9+/-13 ms;P<0.02). Dispersion of AFCL(P5)measured at CV2 was significantly lower than that measured in the same patients at CV1 (19+/-8 ms vs 35+/-11 ms;P=0.02). i.e. dispersion of AFCL(P5)had reduced following a period of sinus rhythm. In contrast, there was no difference in dispersion of AERP between the recurrers and non-recurrers. Dispersion of AERP between CV1 and CV2 did not change following a period of sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: Dispersion of AFCL is relevant to atrial fibrillation recurrence and may represent a manifestation of atrial electrical remodelling in humans. Treatment directed at AFCL dispersion may be useful in the suppression of atrial fibrillation recurrence following cardioversion.     

Different distribution of abnormal endocardial electrograms within the right atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome.

BACKGROUND--Prolonged and fractionated right atrial endocardial electrograms are characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (idiopathic or associated with sick sinus syndrome). The distribution of these abnormal atrial electrograms within the right atrium and the way it is related to the likelihood that patients with sick sinus syndrome will develop paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was studied. METHODS--Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm was performed in 41 control patients with normal sinus node function and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in 33 patients with sick sinus syndrome but without tachycardia, and in 27 patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group 3). The bipolar electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium and an abnormal atrial electrogram was defined as lasting > or = 100 ms and/or showing eight or more fragmented deflections. RESULTS--1195 atrial endocardial electrograms were assessed and quantitatively measured. In patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 54% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium, 28% from the mild right atrium, and 18% from the low right atrium. However, in patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia 78% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium and 22% from the mid right atrium. No abnormal electrograms were recorded from the low right atrium. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia abnormal atrial electrograms generally came from the high right atrium but in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation abnormal atrial electrograms were more widely distributed in the right atrium. In patients with sick sinus syndrome the greater the extent of the compromised atrial muscle, the greater the likelihood that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will develop.     

Interatrial transseptal electrical conduction: comparison of patients with atrial fibrillation and normal controls

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the electrophysiologic properties of interatrial transseptal electrical conduction at Bachmann's bundle and the ostium of the coronary sinus (CS os) in response to pulmonary vein (PV) stimuli, which mimicked spontaneous ectopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred for ablation (15 persistent AF and 25 paroxysmal AF) and 15 control patients were enrolled in the study. During decremental extra-stimulus pacing from the PVs, right atrial activation was analyzed using noncontact mapping and multipolar catheters. The refractory periods and conduction times were calculated for Bachmann's bundle, CS os, and left atrium. The dispersion of refractoriness was calculated as the difference between the refractory periods of Bachmann's bundle and the CS os. The refractory period at Bachmann's bundle was 244 msec in the persistent AF group, 213 msec in the paroxysmal AF group, and 199 msec for controls. The refractory period at the CS os was 220 msec in the persistent AF group, 201 msec in the paroxysmal AF group, and 193 msec for controls. The dispersion of refractoriness was 54 msec in the persistent AF group; this was significantly greater than in paroxysmal AF at 32 msec (P < 0.05) and controls at 13 msec (P < 0.01). During decremental pacing, lengthening of conduction times at both Bachmann's bundle and the CS os were significantly greater in the persistent AF group compared with paroxysmal AF or control groups. A higher dispersion of refractoriness was associated with a higher incidence of inducible AF and a lower rate of ablation success. CONCLUSION: There are differences between the left to right interatrial electrical connections between patients with persistent AF, paroxysmal AF and controls.     

Contraction-excitation feedback in the atria: a cause of changes in refractoriness

The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of an increase in atrial pressure on atrial refractoriness by determining the relation between the atrial pressure and effective refractory period of the atrium. In 21 open chest anesthetized dogs, after the blocking of atrioventricular (AV) conduction by formalin injection, the left atrium and left ventricle were paced sequentially at a fixed cycle length of 300 ms. The AV interval was varied from 0 to 280 ms in 20 ms steps during the recording of aortic and left atrial pressures and refractory period of the left atrium. Mean left atrial pressure was lowest (8.0 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, all values mean +/- SEM) at an AV interval of 47 +/- 3 ms, when refractory period was 135.5 +/- 2.6 ms. Mean left atrial pressure was highest (13.3 +/- 0.5 mm Hg) at an AV interval of 147 +/- 5 ms, when refractory period was 137.9 +/- 2.4 ms (p less than 0.01). Left atrial diameter measured by echocardiography increased from 33.7 +/- 1.8 mm at an AV interval of 47 ms to 37.8 +/- 1.8 mm (p less than 0.01, n = 10) at an AV interval of 147 ms, and mean aortic pressure decreased from 109 +/- 4 to 101 +/- 4 mm Hg. After surgical decentralization of vagal and sympathetic innervation to eliminate baroreflex influence on refractoriness, left atrial refractory period prolonged from 141.6 +/- 3.4 to 145.4 +/- 3.4 ms (p less than 0.01) when mean left atrial pressure increased from 9.5 +/- 0.4 to 15.2 +/- 0.6 mm Hg. A similar relation was noted between right atrial pressure and right atrial refractory period (n = 10) and between left atrial pressure and refractory period of the interatrial septum (n = 12). In six chronically instrumented conscious dogs, left atrial refractory period prolonged from 116.3 +/- 2.3 to 124.2 +/- 1.7 ms (p less than 0.01) when mean left atrial pressure increased from 4.0 +/- 0.8 to 9.0 +/- 0.3 mm Hg. Therefore, an increase in atrial pressure lengthens refractory period of both atria and the interatrial septum in anesthetized and conscious dogs.     

Different distribution of abnormal endocardial electrograms within the right atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome

Background—Prolonged and fractionated right atrial endocardial electrograms are characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (idiopathic or associated with sick sinus syndrome). The distribution of these abnormal atrial electrograms within the right atrium and the way it is related to the likelihood that patients with sick sinus syndrome will develop paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was studied.Methods—Endocardial catheter mapping of the right atrium during sinus rhythm was performed in 41 control patients with normal sinus node function and without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, in 33 patients with sick sinus syndrome but without tachycardia, and in 27 patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group 3). The bipolar electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium and an abnormal atrial electrogram was defined as lasting ≥100 ms and/or showing eight or more fragmented deflections.Results—1195 atrial endocardial electrograms were assessed and quantitatively measured. In patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation 54% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium, 28% from the mid right atrium, and 18% from the low right atrium. However, in patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia 78% of the abnormal atrial electrograms were recorded from the high right atrium and 22% from the mid right atrium. No abnormal electrograms were recorded from the low right atrium.Conclusions—In patients with sick sinus syndrome without tachycardia abnormal atrial electrograms generally came from the high right atrium but in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation abnormal atrial electrograms were more widely distributed in the right atrium. In patients with sick sinus syndrome the greater the extent of the compromised atrial muscle, the greater the likelihood that paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will develop.     

The repolarization-excitability relationship in the human right atrium is unaffected by cycle length, recording site and prior arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between repolarization and excitability in the human atrium under various conditions. BACKGROUND: Action potential duration (APD) measurements from monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings provide a surrogate for measuring the effective refractory period (ERP) in human ventricle. The relationship between repolarization and refractoriness in human atrium and the effect of prior atrial fibrillation/flutter on the ERP/APD correlation are unknown. METHODS: Seven patients with sinus rhythm and 15 patients after conversion of atrial flutter or fibrillation were evaluated. Monophasic action potentials were recorded at multiple right atrial sites and during different basic cycle lengths from 300 to 700 ms, while ERPs were determined by extrastimulus technique using the MAP recording-pacing combination catheter. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between ERP and APD at 70% repolarization (APD70, r = 0.97; p < 0.001) and 90% repolarization (APD90, r = 0.98; p < 0.001), respectively. Refractoriness occurred at a repolarization level of 72 +/- 8%. The ERP/APD70 and ERP/APD90 ratios averaged 1.06 +/- 0.10 and 0.86 +/- 0.08, respectively. These ratios were nearly constant over the entire range of basic cycle lengths, between different sites in individual patients and between different patients. Patients cardioverted from atrial fibrillation or flutter exhibited no significant differences in the ERP/APD relationship compared with patients with sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Effective refractory period and APD are closely related in the human right atrium. Using the MAP recording technique, atrial ERPs can be assessed by measurement of APDs. Effective refractory period is most closely reflected by APD70. Thus, MAP recordings allow investigation of the local activation and repolarization time course beat by beat, visualizing the excitable gap.     

Postcardioversion atrial electrophysiologic changes induced by oral verapamil in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to verify the effect of oral administration of verapamil on atrial electrophysiologic characteristics after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in humans. BACKGROUND: Discordant findings have been reported regarding the efficacy of verapamil in preventing the electrical remodeling induced by AF. METHODS: We determined the effective refractory periods (ERPs) at five pacing cycle lengths (300 to 700 ms) and in five right atrial sites after internal cardioversion of persistent AF (mean duration 238.1+/-305.9 days) in 19 patients. Nine patients received oral verapamil (240 mg/day) starting four weeks before the electrophysiologic study, whereas the other 10 patients were in pharmacologic washout. RESULTS: The mean ERPs were 202.0+/-22.7 ms in the washout group and 189.3+/-18.5 ms in the verapamil group (p < 0.0001). The degree of adaptation of refractoriness to rate was similar in the two groups (mean slope value in the washout group and verapamil group: 0.07+/-0.03 and 0.08+/-0.05, respectively), showing a normal or nearly normal adaptation to rate in the majority of the paced sites in both groups. The mean ERP was slightly longer in the septum than in the lateral wall and in the roof, both in the washout and verapamil groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, long-term administration of verapamil before internal cardioversion resulted in 1) shortening of atrial ERPs; 2) no change in refractoriness dispersion within the right atrium; and 3) no change in atrial ERP adaptation to rate.     

Inducibility of atrial fibrillation during electrophysiologic evaluation is associated with increased dispersion of atrial refractoriness

The impact of atrial dispersion of refractoriness (Disp_A) in the inducibility and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully resolved. AIM: To study the Disp_A and the vulnerability (A_Vuln) for the induction of self-limited (<60 s) and sustained episodes of AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF): 29 patients without structural heart disease and 18 with hypertensive heart disease. Atrial effective refractory period (ERP) was assessed at five sites--right atrial appendage and low lateral right atrium, high interatrial septum, proximal and distal coronary sinus. We compared three groups: group A - AF not inducible (n=13); group B - AF inducible, self-limited (n=18); group C - AF inducible, sustained (n=16). Age, lone AF, hypertension, left atrial and left ventricular (LV) dimensions, LV systolic function, duration of AF history, atrial flutter/tachycardia, previous antiarrhythmics, and Disp_A were analysed with logistic regression to determine association with A_Vuln for AF inducibility. The ERP at different sites showed no differences among the groups. Group A had a lower Disp_A compared to group B (47+/-20 ms vs 82+/-65 ms; p=0.002), and when compared to group C (47+/-20 ms vs 80+/-55 ms; p=0.008). There was no significant difference in Disp_A between groups B and C. By means of multivariate regression analysis, the only predictor of A_Vuln was Disp_A (p=0.04). Conclusion: In patients with PAF, increased Disp_A represents an electrophysiological marker of A_Vuln. Inducibility of both self-limited and sustained episodes of AF is associated with similar values of Disp_A. These findings suggest that the maintenance of AF is influenced by additional factors.     

Prolonged and fractionated right atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome

Intraatrial catheter mapping of the right atrium was performed during sinus rhythm in 92 patients: Group I = 43 control patients without paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or sick sinus node syndrome; Group II = 31 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation but without sick sinus node syndrome; and Group III = 18 patients with both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sick sinus node syndrome. Atrial electrograms were recorded at 12 sites in the right atrium. The duration and number of fragmented deflections of the atrial electrograms were quantitatively measured. The mean duration and number of fragmented deflections of the 516 atrial electrograms in Group I were 74 +/- 11 ms and 3.9 +/- 1.3, respectively. The criteria for an abnormal atrial electrogram were defined as a duration of greater than or equal to 100 ms or eight or more fragmented deflections, or both. Abnormal atrial electrograms were observed in 10 patients (23.3%) in Group I, 21 patients (67.7%) in Group II and 15 patients (83.3%) in Group III (Group II versus Group I, p less than 0.001; Group III versus Group I, p less than 0.001). The mean number of abnormal electrograms per patient with an abnormal electrogram was 1.3 +/- 0.7 in Group I, 2.5 +/- 1.9 in Group II and 3.5 +/- 2.5 in Group III (Group I versus Group II, p less than 0.01; Group II versus Group III, p less than 0.05). A prolonged and fractionated atrial electrogram characteristic of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation can be closely related to the vulnerability of the atrial muscle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)