Combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo describe the response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile of combination gemcitabine, platinum, and bevacizumab (GPB) for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).MethodsA chart review of all patients with recurrent EOC who were treated with D1, D15 GPB in a 28-day cycle at a single institution was performed. Standard doses were gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², cisplatin 30 mg/m² or carboplatin AUC 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. All patients were analyzed for toxicity. RR and PFS were assessed in all patients who received at least 2 cycles of GPB.ResultsThirty-five patients were identified, and 33 received at least 2 cycles of GPB. The majority of patients (80%) were platinum sensitive. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of GPB (range 1–24). Sixteen patients (48%) had a complete response (CR), and 10 patients (30%) had a partial response (PR), for a total RR of 78%. An additional 5 patients (15%) had stable disease, and only 2 (6%) patients had progressive disease. The median overall PFS was 12 months (95% CI 7–15), with a median follow-up time of 10 months (2–22). Two patients (6%) had bowel perforations, and both survived. Hematologic toxicities were most common, with 29% and 14% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia respectively.ConclusionsThe combination of GPB demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment of recurrent EOC. However, serious toxicities occurred, and the safety profile of this combination requires further study.     

A phase II and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion in patients with platinum-resistant and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND: As suggested by preclinical trials, prolonged administration of topotecan, a reversible inhibitor of topoisomerase-I, may have a therapeutic advantage. Following a phase I trial of weekly 72-h topotecan infusion, we performed a phase II trial utilizing this schedule in ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Eligibility included platinum-/paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, measurable disease, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. A dose of 2.0 mg/m(2) of topotecan was administered as a 72-h infusion weekly via an ambulatory pump. Plasma topotecan concentrations were determined prior to and at the completion of each weekly course. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered and 23 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Two hundred eighteen weekly courses of therapy were administered (median 7 weeks, range 4-46 weeks). Toxicity was mild with grade 3 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia occurring in 13, 13, and 17% of patients, respectively. Two of 23 patients (9.1%) (CI 1-28%) had partial responses of 2 and 3 months' duration and 6 had stable disease. Steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations were a median of 1.2 ng/ml (range 0.4-8.00 ng/ml) following the first week of infusion. Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were highest in 2 patients with partial responses. Mean steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations after the first week of infusion were 4.6, 2.0, and 1.3 ng/ml for partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease, respectively. An analysis of variance of steady state plasma topotecan concentrations after the first week of infusion over all administered cycles demonstrated a significant difference in steady state plasma topotecan lactone concentrations between patients with partial response and stable disease and between partial response and no response (significant at the 0.05 level after adjustment for multiple comparisons). Controlling for cycle number, steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are significantly greater for patients with responding or stable disease than those with progressive disease (P = 0.0003) and have a lower bound of > or = 1.9 ng/ml (95% confidence level). CONCLUSION: Steady state topotecan lactone concentrations are associated with responding or stable disease in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer. Steady state topotecan concentrations could potentially be utilized to modify tumor exposure and response.     

Phase 2 evaluation of topotecan administered on a 3-day schedule in the treatment of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to investigate the toxicity and efficacy of a more convenient topotecan administration schedule (in contrast to the "standard" 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days q 21 days) in the management of platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with clinically defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer participating in this phase 2 trial conducted by the Gynecologic Cancer Program of the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center received topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day x 3 days on a 21-day schedule. Both dose escalations and reductions were permitted in the protocol design. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (median age: 61; range: 43-80) were treated with this modified topotecan schedule. These individuals had received a median of two prior regimens (range: 1-4) (retreatment with a platinum agent or paclitaxel considered a single regimen). The median number of topotecan courses delivered was 3 (range: 1-7). Major toxicity included grade 4 neutropenia (24% of patients); neutropenic fever (10%); grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10%); and requirement for blood transfusion (14%). Dose escalation was possible, and dose reductions required, in 14 and 28% of patients, respectively. Two patients exhibited evidence of a clinically relevant response to treatment. CONCLUSION: This 3-day topotecan program is more convenient and less toxic than the standard 5-day regimen. The limited level of activity observed is not inconsistent with that previously reported for the 5-day topotecan infusion schedule in platinum/paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer. Further investigation will be required to document the clinical utility of a 3-day topotecan schedule in a less heavily pretreated and more chemosensitive patient population.     

The costs and efficacy of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer in heavily pretreated patients

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, chemotherapy agents demonstrating modest second-line activity against platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC) are frequently used in patients who have received multiple prior chemotherapy agents. Whether the response rates reported in selected patients can be expected in heavily pretreated patients is not known. Similarly, the costs of palliative chemotherapy are not known. We sought to determine the response, survival, and predictors of response in an unselected cohort of PROC patients receiving liposomal doxorubicin (LD) for relapsed disease, and the overall costs of delivering liposomal doxorubicin in this setting. METHODS: In a cohort of 62 consecutive patients who initiated LD as second- or greater-line therapy for PROC, the following variables were examined: age, number of prior regimens for relapse disease, duration of first clinical remission, time from last prior treatment, dose intensity of LD received, response/clinical benefit, time to progression, toxic effects, and survival. Multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of clinical benefit and overall survival. Direct medical charges were calculated and converted to costs, and major cost drivers determined. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients received a total of 174 cycles of LD. The mean number of cycles per patient was 2 (range, 1-8); the median number of prior regimens for recurrent PROC was 2 (range, 0-8); and the median duration of the first clinical remission was 6 months. Median dose intensity of LD delivered was 11.4 mg/m(2)/week (range, 2.8-16.7 mg/m(2)/week). Nine of sixty-two patients (14.5%) had an objective clinical response by CA-125 and/or CT scan (95% confidence interval, 6-23%). Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 11% of patients. In the full cohort, median time to progression was 2.2 months, and median overall survival, 9.6 months (range, 0.2-26 months). Dose intensity was the only independent predictor of overall response. Duration of first clinical remission and number of prior salvage regimens were associated with longer overall survival. The mean total direct medical cost per cycle of LD was $5763, and the major cost drivers were hospitalizations and drug acquisition/delivery costs. CONCLUSION: LD is an active agent in PROC, even when used as greater-than-second-line therapy. Among heavily pretreated patients, delivering a dose intensity of at least 9.0 mg/m(2)/week was associated with a higher probability of response. The cost per cycle of LD is driven by hospitalizations and drug acquisition/delivery costs.     

Weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: The records of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan after failure of > or =1 prior regimen were reviewed. Patients received topotecan (median starting dose approximately 2.5 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Antitumor response was assessed after 2 cycles by serial CA-125 levels. RESULTS: Thirty-five heavily pretreated patients received a mean of 5 cycles of topotecan (range, 1-13 cycles). Thirty-two patients had definable platinum sensitivity (16 sensitive, 8 resistant, 8 refractory). Median age was 56 years. A total of 177 cycles (534 weeks) of topotecan was administered. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild, and no grade 4 toxicities were observed. Grade 3 hematologic toxicity, including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, was observed in 2, 2, 1, and 0 patients, respectively. No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity. Based on serial CA-125 measurements, there were 1 (3%) complete and 5 (15%) partial responses, with 1 of the partial responses in a patient with platinum-refractory disease. Stable disease was reported in 13 (38%) patients, including 5 patients with platinum-resistant/refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan demonstrates activity and is well tolerated compared with historical data with the standard 5-day schedule. Higher doses may be warranted because of the high tolerability shown for weekly topotecan. Weekly topotecan may be an appropriate treatment option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, especially heavily pretreated patients who might require dosing schedules with improved tolerability.     

Pegfilgrastim for the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma—a cost-effectiveness analysis

The objective is to assess the cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim for the prevention of hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) receiving taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy. A decision analysis model evaluated a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients receiving six cycles of taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy for EOC. Three strategies were analyzed for the prevention of hospitalization due to FN: 1) dose modifications and delays after a hospitalization for FN without the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) (NO G-CSF); 2) all patients receive G-CSF with each chemotherapy cycle (1 degrees PROPHYLAXIS); 3) patients receive G-CSF for all subsequent chemotherapy cycles after a hospitalization for FN (2 degrees PROPHYLAXIS). The model was applied to two patient populations: 1) an average-risk population (FN hospitalization rate = 5%); 2) a high-risk population (FN hospitalization rate = 16%). Using baseline assumptions in an average-risk population, NO G-CSF was the least expensive strategy with a cost of $68 million and resulted in 2,860 hospitalizations for FN. 2 degrees PROPHYLAXIS resulted in 141 fewer hospitalizations than NO G-CSF at a cost of $76,288 per hospitalization prevented. 1 degrees PROPHYLAXIS was the most effective and resulted in 1,689 fewer hospitalizations for FN compared to NO G-CSF at a cost of $47,343 per hospitalization prevented. When this model is applied to a high-risk patient population, 1 degrees PROPHYLAXIS is more effective and less expensive than both NO G-CSF and 2 degrees PROPHYLAXIS. We conclude that in average-risk patients receiving chemotherapy for EOC the use of pegfilgrastim is effective at reducing hospitalizations due to FN, but at a significant cost. However, in high-risk patients, primary prophylaxis is the only cost-effective strategy and should be strongly considered.     

Retrospective analysis of weekly topotecan as salvage therapy in relapsed ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of weekly topotecan in heavily pretreated patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data were collected by retrospective review of patient records. Eligible patients had received > or =2 prior regimens for ovarian cancer before treatment with weekly topotecan. Efficacy was determined by measurable disease or CA 125 levels. Adverse event and growth factor support data were also collected. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age, 61 years) were evaluable for safety and received a total of 244 4-week cycles of therapy (median, 3; range, 1-21 cycles). Most patients (84%) had measurable disease, and 30% had performance status of > or =2. Patients had received two to six prior treatments for ovarian cancer. Median weekly dose per patient was topotecan 3.7 mg/m(2). Grade 4 hematologic toxicities (generally manageable) occurred in 4% of patients. One patient had febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue in two (4%) patients. Forty-two patients were evaluable for response. Of 35 evaluable patients with measurable disease, 11 (31%) had a partial response (median duration, 3 months), and 15 (43%) patients had stable disease (median duration, 3.5 months). Of 41 evaluable patients with elevated CA 125 (median, 154 U/l; range, 47-7200 U/l), 11 (27%) had > or =50% decreases or normalization of CA 125 levels. Median time to progression in all patients with stable disease has not been reached (follow-up range, 1.5-17.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly topotecan is active and well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Prospective studies of this regimen are warranted.     

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE: In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.     

Early CA-125 fluctuations in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy

The objective of this study was to analyze retrospective populations with recurrent ovarian cancer to assess differences in CA-125 patterns during chemotherapy. The populations included all patients treated between January 1994 and January 2004, who received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan, and all patients treated between July 1997 and June 2001, who received carboplatin. Prognostic variables were abstracted from the medical records. Eighty-nine patients received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan therapy and 21 received carboplatin; of these, 59 (liposomal doxorubicin), 60 (topotecan), and 17 (carboplatin) patients had evaluable CA-125 patterns. Patients given liposomal doxorubicin were more likely to have received only one or two cycles of therapy (37/89 [42%]) than patients receiving either carboplatin (5/21 [24%]) or topotecan (20/89[22%]). In cycle 1, CA-125 increases in patients were carboplatin, 4/17 (24%); liposomal doxorubicin, 41/59 (69%); and topotecan, 11/60 (18%). In cycle 2, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 2/16 (13%); liposomal doxorubicin, 19/37 (51%); and topotecan, 9/50 (18%). In cycle 3, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 0/12 (0%); liposomal doxorubicin, 7/23 (30%); and topotecan, 6/38 (16%). Of patients having any CA-125 decrease and given two or more cycles, fewer declines were seen in those given liposomal doxorubicin precycle 2 (18/35[51%]) than in those given carboplatin (13/16[81%]) or topotecan (49/56[88%]). The most prominent delay in CA-125 decline was in patients given liposomal doxorubicin compared with those given topotecan or carboplatin. In the entire population, only 3 of 107 (2.8%) patients demonstrated first CA-125 decline precycle 4. Discontinuation of therapy solely on the basis of early CA-125 increase (precycle 3), particularly with liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy, may exclude some patients who will benefit from continued therapy.     

Ethnicity is a factor to be considered before dose planning in ovarian cancer patients to be treated with topotecan

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of topotecan in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer. A retrospective analysis on recurrent ovarian cancer patients receiving topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) daily for 5 consecutive days on a 21-day cycle from 1997 to 2002 was conducted. The patients included were all treated with at least two cycles of topotecan. The patient characteristics were compared in relation to their toxicity profile and their response to treatment. Response was evaluated by physical findings, imaging techniques, and serum CA125 level. A total of 60 patients were included in the study. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. A total of 361 cycles were given (median, 5 per patient; range 2-15). The major toxicity was neutropenia, which was grade 4 in 45.0% of the patients and 10.2% of the cycles. Age was the only covariate predicting the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia (logistic regression P= 0.046, CI 1.01-1.12). Neutropenic fever occurred in 8.3% of the patients. Eighteen (30%) patients were required to delay their chemotherapy and 11 (18.3%) required dose reduction. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. The overall response rate was 21.6%, with eight (13.3%) complete responses and five (8.3%) partial responses. The median duration of response and median time to progression were 11 and 5 months, respectively. The median survival was 14 months. Topotecan 1.25 mg/m(2) in a five-times-daily schedule was well tolerated in a cohort of Chinese patients. Myelotoxicity was the most important side effect in our study, but the incidence is much lower than that reported in other studies. Age was an independent factor predicting the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia.     

Efficacy and tolerability of lower-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer: a retrospective case review

Topotecan (1.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 consecutive days of a 21-day cycle) is an established recurrent ovarian cancer treatment, but myelosuppression can be dose limiting. This study evaluates the activity and tolerability of low-dose topotecan in our clinical experience. Case records were reviewed for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in first through third relapse. Eligible patients had received > or =2 cycles of < or =1.25 mg/m(2) topotecan. Adverse events were evaluated using laboratory and clinical evaluation data. Twenty-seven eligible patients, most with advanced disease, received a total of 209 cycles (median, six cycles). Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities during 184 cycles in 24 assessed patients were neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia in 35%, 28%, 36%, and 11% of cycles, and 21, 19, 16, and 10 patients, respectively. Only four grade 4 toxicities occurred: anemia (one) and thrombocytopenia (three). Myelosuppression was reversible, noncumulative, and manageable. Moreover, nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild to moderate, and the only two grade 3 events were constipation and deep vein thrombosis. Low-dose topotecan was active in this setting. Lower-dose topotecan is generally well tolerated and active in patients with pretreated ovarian cancer. Prospective clinical trials of low-dose topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer are warranted.     

Topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer: is sequence important?

Abstract.   Dupont J, Aghajanian C, Andrea G, Lovegren M, Chuai S, Venkatraman E, Hensley M, Anderson S, Spriggs D, Sabbatini P. Topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer: is sequence important? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16(Suppl. 1): 68–73.
A variety of agents have emerged to treat patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Most patients receive both topotecan (T) and liposomal doxorubicin (D); however, there are no data regarding the benefit of a sequence—D followed by T (DT) or T followed by D (TD). We identified 89 consecutive patients with recurrent EOC, who received both D and T from January 1994 to January 2004 at Memorial Hospital. We compared the duration of treatment, toxicity, and overall survival (OS) for patients who received either DT or TD. Sixty-four patients received DT, and 25 patients received TD. The groups were balanced regarding age, stage, surgical debulking, platinum sensitivity, prior therapy, and intervening drugs between D and T. Median numbers of cycles on DT and TD were seven and six, respectively ( P = 0.61); there was no difference in duration based on platinum sensitivity. Removal from therapy for toxicity was similar, DT (22%) and TD (36%) ( P = 0.18). Finally, there was no difference in median OS based on sequence, DT (18.28 months) and TD (17.75 months) ( P = NS). Platinum sensitivity did not affect median OS based on sequence. Based on duration, toxicity, and OS there is no advantage of one sequence of D and T when treating patients with recurrent EOC.     

Sorafenib as a third line therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a phase II study

Purpose

New agents are required for the patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who progress after first and second line of the treatment. Tumor vasculature targeted agents are potentially active in EOC. We aimed to assess the activity of sorafenib in patients with recurrent EOC who had received two prior therapies.

Patients and methods

A phase II non-randomized, open-label, single-arm study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerance of sorafenib monotherapy as a third line therapy in patients with EOC or primary peritoneal cancer (PPC). Sorafenib was administered as 400 mg twice daily on days 1–28 of each 4-week cycle. The primary end point of the study was to demonstrate the progression free survival (PFS).

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled. The median number of cycles was two. Among the 11 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, no patients experienced a partial response or complete response or stable disease lasting longer than 6 months according to RECIST criteria. Thus, the trial stopped at the end of the first stage of study design. The median PFS was 2.00 months (95% CI, 1,80–3,90). The median OS was 11.78 months (95% CI, 7.66 to 15.39). There were no grade 4 toxicities and few grade 3 toxicities.

Conclusion

Sorafenib fails to achieve sufficient objective response or sustained disease stabilization as third-line treatment for EOC.     

Gemcitabine reverses cisplatin resistance: demonstration of activity in platinum- and multidrug-resistant ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Preclinical models in an ovarian cancer cell line (A2780) demonstrate synergistic activity with the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin compared to either single agent alone. Platinum resistance is related to expression of excision repair proteins, one of which (ERCC-1) has been identified as playing a critical role in the synergy of gemcitabine and cisplatin. We evaluated the cisplatin and gemcitabine regimen in patients with platinum refractory and multidrug refractory ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. METHODS: Gemcitabine (750 mg/m(2)) was administered intravenously over 30 min followed by cisplatin (30 mg/m(2)) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Day 8 therapy was canceled for an absolute neutrophil count <1000/mm(3) or platelet count <75,000/mm(3). Sequential dose reductions of gemcitabine to 600, 400, and 300 mg/m(2) were prescribed in the event of canceled therapy, neutropenic sepsis, or severe thrombocytopenia (platelets <20,000/m(3)). RESULTS: Thirty-six platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant patients were studied. Thirty-five were evaluable for response, of which 6 had progressed on gemcitabine as a single agent. Fifteen of the patients responded (42.9%, 95% CI 28.0-59.1%). Eleven were partial clinical responses and 4 were complete clinical responses, with 4 of the 6 patients who had failed gemcitabine as a single agent responding. Among the responding patients the median response duration was 11 months (range 4-14 months). For all patients the progression-free interval was 6 months (range 1-14 months). The median survival was 12 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is active in patients who are platinum resistant. Additionally, activity is demonstrated even in patients who have previously been resistant to gemcitabine.     

A phase II study of gemcitabine,carboplatin and bevacizumab for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Purpose

The doublet gemcitabine and carboplatin is effective for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, while multi-agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab may add additional benefit. This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of a biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or tubal cancer (ROC).

Patients and methods

Eligible patients received concurrent gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², carboplatin area under the curve 3, and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 every 28 days for six cycles or up to 24 cycles if clinical benefit occurred. The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST, and safety; the secondary end points were objective response rates and overall survival.

Results

Overall, 45 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 15.3). The objective response rate was 69%. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (27%) and thrombocytopenia (2%). Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities included fatigue (18%), pain (9%), and nausea/vomiting (4%). There were 2 episodes of cerebrovascular accidents, 2 noted DVTs, and no episodes of bowel perforation. Median OS was 36.1 months (95% CI, 26.7 to 45.5).

Conclusion

Biweekly gemcitabine, carboplatin, and bevacizumab were an effective regimen in recurrent ovarian cancer, with comparable toxicity to recently reported day 1 gemcitabine, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and day 8 gemcitabine. Response rate and PFS are improved from reported outcomes of the gemcitabine carboplatin doublet. The degree to which biweekly dosing may present a more rationale schedule for this triplet should be evaluated further.     

Phase II study of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian,fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Platinum-sensitive or -resistant patients with recurrent or persistent EOC were eligible if they had received up to 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, including a platinum/taxane regimen without prior bevacizumab. Pemetrexed 500 mg/m² IV and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV were administered every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS); other endpoints included toxicities, PFS and overall survival (OS).

Results

Thirty-four patients received a median of 7 treatment cycles (range, 2–26). Median follow-up was 25.7 months (range, 3.0–47.2). Six month progression-free survival (PFS) was 56% (95% CI: 38–71). The following response rates were documented (%; 95% CI): 0 complete response, 14 partial responses (41%; 25–59), 18 stable disease (53%; 35–70) and 2 progressive disease (6%; 1–20). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI, 4.6–10.9), with a median OS of 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.4–29.8). Twenty-two patients (64.7%) had a platinum-free interval (PFI) of > 6 months prior to enrollment. Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (12%) and anemia (9%). Non-hematologic grade 3–4 toxicities included metabolic (29%), constitutional (18%), pain (18%) and gastrointestinal (15%). Two patients developed hematologic malignancies within one year of treatment.

Conclusions

Combination bevacizumab/pemetrexed is an active option for both platinum-sensitive and -resistant recurrent EOC. Further investigation of cost and novel toxicities associated with this regimen may be warranted.     

A phase I trial of gemcitabine and topotecan in previously treated ovarian or peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent cancer after treatment with a platinum and paclitaxel-containing regimen were eligible for this study. Initial treatment was gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and topotecan at a dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) on days 2-5, with cycles repeated every 28 days. Dose escalations were planned first for topotecan (Cohort I, Dose Levels 1-5) then for gemcitabine (Cohort II, Dose Levels 6-9) until the MTD was reached. RESULTS: Ten patients received a total of 29 cycles. When none of the first four patients could complete therapy as prescribed due to toxicity, doses for each drug were reduced by 1 day. The next six patients were treated at the modified schedule of gemcitabine days 1 and 8 and topotecan days 2-4 (Dose Level -1). Despite this modification, dose-limiting toxicities including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and stomatitis occurred at Dose Level -1, and the study was closed early. CONCLUSIONS: At both the initial dose schedule and an attenuated schedule, the combination of gemcitabine and topotecan produced dose-limiting toxicities in women with previously treated epithelial ovarian or peritoneal cancer.     

Phase II evaluation of a 3-day infusion of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients treated with topotecan at 2.0 mg/m2/day x 3 days every 3 weeks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with > or =6 months elapsed from time of prior platinum treatment. Patients were required to have a performance status of < or =2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity was assessed using standard criteria. Chi-square and Student's t tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The mean age of the patients was 63.2 years (range 43-85). Median time to progression from initial treatment was 11.8 months. A total of 286 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with an average of 7.1 cycles per patient. Overall median time to progression (TTP) with 3-day topotecan treatment was 21 weeks (range 6-43 weeks). Of the 33 patients with measurable disease, 24% (11-42%, 95% CI) demonstrated a response. Seven patients had CA-125 evaluable disease with a response of 43% (10-89%, 95% CI). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 weeks (range 12-21 weeks, 95% CI). Median overall survival was 106 weeks (range 76-117 weeks, 95% CI). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 90% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Administration of topotecan as a 3-day regimen is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. Critical comparison to the 5-day regimen in a randomized fashion is warranted.     

Sequence dependence of hematologic toxicity using carboplatin and topotecan for primary therapy of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Selection of a feasible sequence and schedule of carboplatin in combination with topotecan for evaluation in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stages III-IV EOC or primary peritoneal carcinoma without prior chemotherapy were assigned to consecutive cohorts evaluating a "forward" (carboplatin day 1, topotecan days 1-3), "reverse" (carboplatin day 3, topotecan days 1-3), or "extended reverse" sequence (carboplatin day 5, topotecan days 1-5). Patients received 4 cycles carboplatin-topotecan followed by 4 cycles carboplatin-paclitaxel. Feasibility was defined according to the cumulative proportion of patients with dose-limiting events (DLEs) during the first four cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled across 5 cohorts. The forward sequence demonstrated unacceptable hematologic DLEs at the lowest topotecan dose (0.75 mg/m2/day x 3 days). The reverse sequence was feasible at 1.25 mg/m2/day x 3 days, with only 1/15 patients experiencing a DLE within 4 cycles, and 14/15 patients were able to receive 4 subsequent cycles of carboplatin-paclitaxel. The extended reverse sequence was associated with excessive DLEs at 1.00 mg/m2/day x 5 days. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not required. CONCLUSION: Higher doses of topotecan could be safely administered with reduced toxicity over multiple cycles using the reverse sequence, which was selected for phase III evaluation. The relative efficacy of the forward and reverse sequence is unknown.     

Efficacy and toxicity of weekly topotecan in recurrent epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of once-weekly topotecan (Hycamtin; GlaxoSmithKline) for relapsed or persistent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC). METHODS: Patients with recurrent or persistent EOC and PPC previously treated with > or = 1 course of platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with weekly topotecan 4.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle in this prospective open-label, single-arm, phase II study. RESULTS: The median age of the 63 study patients was 63 years (range, 36-88); patients had been previously exposed to a median of 1 course (range, 1-4) of chemotherapy. A median of 5 courses (range, 1-16) were administered. Median follow-up time was 13. 2 month s (range, 1.5-39.0). The overall response rate (RR) was 23.8%, of which 17.5% (11 patients) represented a complete response and 6.3% (4 patients) a partial response. Patients with platinum-sensitive disease had a RR of 20%, whereas patients with platinum-resistant disease had a RR of 28.6%. Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval: 4.43, 7.97), and median survival from initiation of topotecan therapy was 22.3 months (95% confidence interval: 14.56, 30.04). Hematologic toxicities included grade 3 anemia in 3 (4.8%) patients, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 3 (4.8%) patients, and grades 3-4 neutropenia in 5 (7.9%) patients. Dose reductions, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and erythropoietin support were required by 10 (15.9%), 6 (9.5%), and 16 (25.4%) patients, respectively. The most frequent nonhematologic toxicities were grades 2-3 fatigue in 10 (15.9%) patients and grades 2-3 nausea/vomiting in 3 (4.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly administration of topotecan 4.0 mg/m2 is active and well tolerated by patients with recurrent or persistent EOC and PPC.