Colostomy closure after Hartmann's procedure with fast-track rehabilitation

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of postoperative multimodal rehabilitation after colostomy closure after Hartmanns procedure. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients scheduled for colostomy closure after Hartmanns procedure received continuous postoperative epidural analgesia, laxative, and enforced oral liquids, protein drinks, and mobilization. RESULTS: Defecation occurred at a median 2 days postoperatively. Mean and median postoperative stay was 3 days, with two readmissions (1 anastomotic dehiscence and 1 social) increasing mean total 1-month hospital stay to 4.3 (median, 3) days. No other complications occurred except three superficial wound infections. CONCLUSION: Postoperative hospital stay and morbidity may be reduced with multimodal rehabilitation after open colostomy closure after Hartmanns resection.     

The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial

PURPOSE: Colorectal surgery is associated with postoperative ileus, which contributes to delayed discharge. This study was designed to investigate the effect of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia on gastrointestinal function after colorectal surgery under standardized controlled postoperative care. METHODS: Forty-two patients diagnosed with either colonic cancer, diverticulitis, polyps, or adenoma, and scheduled for elective colorectal surgery, were randomly assigned to either postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine (n=21) or epidural analgesia with a mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl (n=21). Postoperative early oral feeding and assistance to mobilization were offered to all patients. Pain visual analog scale (1–100 mm), passage of flatus and bowel movements, length of hospital stay, and readiness for discharge were recorded. RESULTS: Pain visual analog scale (visual analog scale, 1–100 mm) at rest, on coughing, and daily on mobilization was significantly lower in the epidural group compared with the patient-controlled analgesia group. Median values for the visual analog scale group were 7 (95 percent confidence interval, 2–18) mm, 19 (95 percent confidence interval, 4–38) mm, and 10 (95 percent confidence interval, 5–33) mm, respectively, and, for the patient-controlled analgesia group, were 24 (95 percent confidence interval, 18–51) mm, 59 (95 percent confidence interval, 33–74) mm, and 40 (95 percent confidence interval, 29–79) mm, respectively (P<0.01). Intake of protein and calories and time out of bed were similar in both groups. Mean time intervals ± standard deviation from surgery to first flatus and first bowel movement occurred earlier in the epidural group, 1.9±0.6 days and 3.1±1.7 days, respectively, compared with patient-controlled analgesia, 3.6±1.5 days and 4.6 ± 1.6 days, respectively (P<0.01). Postoperative complications occurred in 33 percent of the patient-controlled analgesia group and 28 percent of the epidural group. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups with a mean of 7.3±3.7 days in the patient-controlled analgesia group and 8.5±4.2 days in the epidural group. Readiness for discharge was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia has distinct advantages over patient-controlled analgesia morphine in providing superior quality of analgesia and shortening the duration of postoperative ileus. However, discharge home was not faster, indicating that other perioperative factors influence the length of hospital stay.Supported by the Royal Victoria Hospital Research Institute and by research funds from the Departments of Anesthesia and Surgery, McGill University Health Centre.Presented at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.     

Colonic Surgery With Accelerated Rehabilitation or Conventional Care

BACKGROUND For patients undergoing colonic surgery, the postoperative hospital stay is usually 6 to 10 days, and the morbidity rate is 15 to 20 percent. Fast-track rehabilitation programs have reduced the hospital stay to 2 to 3 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcome after colonic resection with conventional care compared with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation.METHODS One hundred thirty consecutive patients receiving conventional care (group 1) in one hospital were compared with 130 consecutive patients receiving multimodal, fast-track rehabilitation (group 2) in another hospital. Outcomes were time to first defecation after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity during the first postoperative month.RESULTS Median age was 74 years (group 1) and 72 years (group 2). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was significantly higher in group 2 (P < 0.05). Defecation occurred on day 4.5 in group 1 and day 2 in group 2 (P < 0.05). Median hospital stay was 8 days in group 1 and 2 days in group 2 (P < 0.05). The use of a nasogastric tube was longer in group 1 (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate (35 patients) was lower in group 2 (P < 0.05), especially cardiopulmonary complications (5 patients; P < 0.01). Readmission was necessary in 12 percent of cases for group 1 and 20 percent in group 2 (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS Time to first defecation, hospital stay, and morbidity may be reduced after colonic resection with fast-track multimodal rehabilitation.Reprints are not available.     

Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse

PURPOSE: Objectives of this study were to describe the technique of laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and audit the clinical outcomes, including review of functional results. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for duration of operation, time to passage of flatus and feces postoperatively, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Follow-up was performed by an independent assessor using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were also assessed by clinical review or telephone interview. RESULTS: During a four-year period, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse, of which 30 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy. Median duration of the operations was 185 minutes, median time for passage of flatus was two days postoperatively, and median length of hospital stay was five days. Morbidity was 13 percent and mortality rate was 3 percent. Comparison between the first ten patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and the last ten revealed a significant reduction in both median duration of operating time (224vs. 163 minutes;P<0.005) and length of stay (6vs. 4 days;P<0.015). Follow-up study conducted at a median time of 18 months revealed that most patients (92 percent) felt that the operation had improved their symptoms, that incontinence was improved in 14 of 20 patients with impaired continence (70 percent), and that constipation was improved in 64 percent. Symptoms of incomplete emptying and the need to strain at stool were both improved in 62 and 59 percent of patients, respectively. No full-thickness recurrences have occurred, but two patients have had mucosal prolapse detected (7 percent) and treated. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy is feasible and safe, with acceptable recurrence rates and functional results compared with the open procedure in the surgical literature. There is rapid return of intestinal function associated with an early discharge from hospital.Read at the meeting of The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Brisbane, Australia, May 11 to 15, 1997.     

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse

PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to evaluate the role of laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection as a safe and effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. METHOD: Data were prospectively collected and analyzed on 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectopexy without resection for full-thickness rectal prolapse between October 1994 and July 1998. Four patients had conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery. Two patients had recurrent prolapse previously managed by Delorme's procedure. Another two patients had solitary rectal ulcer syndrome associated with their full-thickness rectal prolapse. There were a total of three males. Mean age was 72 (range, 37–89) years. The preoperative and postoperative course of each patient was followed up, with attention paid to first bowel movement, hospital stay, duration of surgery, fecal incontinence, constipation, recurrent prolapse, morbidity, and mortality. Follow-up was made by clinic appointments and, if necessary, by telephone review. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 26 (range, 1–41) months. Mean duration of surgery was 96 (range, 50–150) minutes. Postoperatively, the median time for first bowel movement was four (range, 2–10) days. Median hospital stay was seven (range, 3–23) days. Overall, 15 patients (60 percent) either improved or remained unchanged with respect to continence. There was an improvement in 10 of 20 patients (50 percent) among those with continence Grade 2 or more (P<0.05). Seven patients (28 percent) remained incontinent. No patient became more incontinent after surgery. Constipation, which was present in 9 patients (36 percent) preoperatively, affected 11 patients (44 percent) after rectopexy (P>0.05; not significant). Postoperative morbidity included a port site hernia and deep venous thrombosis in one patient, a repaired rectal perforation, a retroperitoneal hematoma with prolonged ileus (1 case), and a superficial wound infection (1 case). One patient with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in the laparoscopic surgery group remained unhealed despite resolution of the rectal prolapse after rectopexy and required abdominoperineal resection. Two patients (laparoscopic surgery = 1 and open surgery = 1) had severe constipation after surgery and both required loop colostomies. There were no cases of operative mortality or recurrent prolapse. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is both safe and effective in this frequently frail population and offers a minimally invasive approach that may have potential advantages for selected groups of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.Mr. Hartley was supported by an education grant from Autosuture UK.Presented in part to the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Brighton, United Kingdom, May 4 to 7 1999.     

Postoperative ileus--an update on preventive techniques

This article reviews techniques currently used to prevent or reduce the duration of postoperative ileus (POI), which is considered an undesirable stress response to major abdominal surgery that leads to discomfort, morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. In several randomized studies, a number of techniques have been demonstrated to reduce the occurrence and/or duration of POI: thoracic epidural analgesia with local anesthetics, peripheral opioid antagonists, laxatives, chewing gum, intravenous and incisional local anesthetics, and avoidance of routine nasogastric intubation and fluid excess. Early institution of oral feeding and laparoscopic surgery might also be effective, but there is less clear evidence available to support their use. When some of these techniques are combined as part of the concept of multimodal postoperative rehabilitation (fast-track surgery), the duration of POI after open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery can be reduced to 24-48 h in most patients. There is a need for data on the effect of these techniques on POI when applied to major upper abdominal surgeries and emergency abdominal operations (e.g. trauma, peritonitis, etc.).     

腹部弧形切口行乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤切除术45例分析

目的探讨腹部弧形切口行乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤手术治疗中的应用价值。 方法回顾性分析齐齐哈尔市第一医院肿瘤外科2014年7月至2016年6月间45例行腹部弧形切口乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤治疗患者的临床资料。 结果45例患者均行腹部弧形切口并顺利完成手术,无副损伤出现,中位术后镇痛时间1.8天,中位排气时间3.2天,中位淋巴结清扫数14枚,中位切口长度11 cm,手术时间、出血量及并发症、住院时间与以往的传统手术相比并无明显增加。 结论腹部弧形切口能够有效完成乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤手术,具有手术切口隐蔽、美观、术后疼痛感轻的优点、符合快速康复外科及美容外科的理念,并且手术操作较简单便于基层医院开展,而手术风险及并发症并未增加。因此腹部弧形切口值得在临床中推广应用。     

Open <Emphasis Type="Italic">vs.</Emphasis> Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Prolapse

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse. METHODS: A case-control study was undertaken. The case group consisted of a consecutive series of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse between February 1993 and June 2000. The control group underwent open prolapse repair between October 1987 and January 2000. RESULTS: There were 53 patients in each group. The groups were matched according to operation type, gender, and age. Median operative time was longer in the case group than in the control group (resection rectopexy 210 vs. 117 minutes, rectopexy 127.5 vs. 72 minutes, respectively). Median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the case group than in the control group (resection rectopexy 5 vs. 7 days, rectopexy 4.5 vs. 7 days, respectively). Median intraoperative bleeding was minor in the case group (resection rectopexy 35 vs. 300 ml, rectopexy 15 vs. 100 ml, respectively). Mortality (0 vs. 4 percent), complications (23 vs. 30 percent), late complications (4 vs. 13 percent), and the rate of recurrent prolapse (6 vs. 13 percent) did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse is technically feasible and can be performed with mortality and morbidity rates comparable to those of the conventional technique. The main advantages of the laparoscopic approach appear to be a shorter hospital stay and lessened intraoperative blood loss. Recurrence rate is not increased in the short term.     

Complete rectal prolapse

Optional treatment for complete rectal prolapse remains controversial. PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience over a 19-year period to assess trends in choice of operation, recurrence rates, and functional results. METHODS: We identified 372 patients who underwent surgery for complete rectal prolapse between 1976 and 1994. Charts were reviewed and follow-up (median, 64; range, 12–231 months) was obtained by mailed questionnaire (149 patients; 40 percent) and telephone interview (35 patients; 9 percent). Functional results were obtained from 184 responders (49 percent). RESULTS: Median age of patients was 64 (11–100) years, and females outnumbered males by nine to one. One-hundred and eighty-eight patients (51 percent) were lost to follow-up; 183 patients (49 percent) underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy, and 161 patients (43 percent) underwent abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection. The percentage of patients who underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy increased from 22 percent in the first five years of the study to 79 percent in the most recent five years. Patients undergoing perineal rectosigmoidectomy were more likely to have associated medical problems as compared with patients undergoing abdominal rectopexy (61vs. 30 percent,P=0.00001). There was no significant difference in morbidity, with 14 percent for perineal rectosigmoidectomyvs. 20 percent for abdominal rectopexy. Abdominal procedures were associated with a longer length of stay as compared with perineal rectosigmoidectomy (8vs. 5 days,P=0.001). Perineal procedures, however, had a higher recurrence rate (16vs. 5 percent,P=0.002). Functional improvement was not significantly different, and most patients were satisfied with treatment and outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that abdominal rectopexy with bowel resection is associated with low recurrence rates. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy provides lower morbidity and shorter length of stay, but recurrence rates are much higher. Despite this, perineal rectosigmoidectomy has appeal as a lesser procedure for elderly patients or those patients in the high surgical risk category. For younger patients, the benefits of perineal rectosigmoidectomy being a lesser procedure must be weighed against a higher recurrence rate.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996, and at the Tripartite Meeting, London, United Kingdom, July 8 to 10, 1996.     

手辅助腹腔镜与传统开腹直肠癌根治术的对比研究

目的通过手辅助腹腔镜与开腹下直肠癌根治术的对比研究,评估手辅助腹腔镜在直肠癌根治手术中应用的优劣。 方法对本院103例接受手辅助腹腔镜和开腹手术的直肠癌患者的基本临床资料、手术切口、术中出血、手术时间、术后恢复、病理结果、近期疗效等进行统计学分析。 结果两组患者的基本临床资料无统计学差异,手辅助腹腔镜组的手术切口长度、手术出血量、术后住院天数、术后镇痛、术后排气时间等方面明显优于开腹组,两组在手术时间、术后并发症发生率等方面无统计学差异。术后两组患者平均随访26个月,各自出现2例远处转移及复发,无切口种植情况。 结论手辅助腹腔镜直肠癌根治术是安全的微创手术方式,具有住院时间短、进食及肠道功能恢复快,疼痛减轻,出血量较少,手术彻底性良好的特点。     

Limited cryoablation reduces hospital stay and opioid consumption compared to thoracic epidural analgesia after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum

pain following minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) is a critical concern that leads to a prolonged hospital stay and high doses of opiates administered to the patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative cryoanalgesia (cryoablation of the intercostal nerves) during MIRPE. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 64 patients who underwent MIRPE and received cryoanalgesia or epidural analgesia between January 2019 and January 2021. The oral morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was used to calculate the dosage of opioid agents. The median age was 15 years (range, 4–33 years). The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2–6 days), with a median oral MME consumption of 45 mg (ranging from 0 to 1360 mg). Cryoanalgesia was performed in 38 patients, and epidural analgesia was administered to the remaining 26 patients. The cryoanalgesia group had a significantly lesser pain score, shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower oral MME consumption than the epidural analgesia group (5 vs 2; P < .001, 3 days vs 5 days; P < .001, 19 mg vs 634 mg; P < .001). Cryoanalgesia appears to reduce postoperative hospital stay and opioid consumption compared with epidural analgesia. The outcomes of this study indicate that cryoanalgesia might be a safe and effective method for pain control following MIRPE.     

Effect of abdominal Ivalon® rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall

Bowel habit in 57 rectal prolapse patients was assessed before and after abdominal Ivalon rectopexy. There was a significant (chi-square = 8.7, P less than 0.01) increase in prevalence of constipation from 30 percent before to 51 percent after surgery. There were two explanations for this increased constipation. It was mainly the result of a 28 percent increase in prevalence of constipation among patients who were incontinent before rectopexy. Incontinent prolapse patients were more likely to acquire a predictable bowel habit after rectopexy if they became constipated. There was also a small (7 percent) increase in prevalence of constipation among continent patients, which could be attributed to the rectopexy procedure. In a subgroup of 15 patients, rectal wall thickness after rectopexy was assessed by pelvic computed tomographic scan carried out before and after surgery, or at more than one year after surgery. There was a significant (t = 4.5, P less than 0.001) increase in rectal wall thickness by 24 weeks after rectopexy, compared with before operation. This increase was also seen in a further five patients undergoing abdominal rectopexy without Ivalon sponge, suggesting that it was a consequence of rectal mobilization rather than the Ivalon sponge. This increased rectal wall thickness may impede the passage of formed stool into the lower rectum and contribute to the increased constipation found after rectopexy.     

Functional Results of Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy for Symptomatic Rectal Intussusception

Purpose This study was designed to assess the role of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception in patients who failed medical treatment. The functional outcomes of laparoscopic resection rectopexy were evaluated. Methods Patients who underwent laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal intussusception between July 1998 and November 2004 were identified. All patients with obstructed defecation failing medical treatment were included. Data were prospectively collected for the perioperative period. A follow-up questionnaire was used to assess functional outcome. Results Between 1998 and 2004, a total of 56 patients (53 females (95 percent); age range, 23–83 years) underwent laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal intussusception. The median operative time was 123 minutes. Morbidity was 7 percent, and there was no mortality. Fifty-two patients were available for follow-up, and of these 33 (63 percent) reported an overall improvement in their function after surgery. Of 28 patients suffering constipation, 15 (53 percent) reported an improvement in bowel frequency. Sixty-seven percent of patients incontinent before surgery improved. Symptoms of incomplete evacuation resolved in 38 percent of affected patients. Thirty-six percent of patients needing to strain at stool did not have this problem after surgery. Median follow-up was 44 (range, 15–92) months. Conclusions The management of patients with rectal intussusception and obstructed defecation failing medical treatment is challenging. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy is an option that might offer symptomatic relief and improved function. Further studies are required to define the selection criteria to optimize the outcome in this patient group. Reprints are not available.     

Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted

INTRODUCTION: Readmission after discharge from the hospital is an undesirable outcome. In an attempt to prevent unplanned readmissions after abdominal or perineal colon resection, we proposed to identify risk factors associated with return to the hospital. METHODS: Study participants consisted of 249 patients who were operated on from July 1, 1996, to March 30, 1998. All patients who were readmitted within 90 days of discharge from the hospital after surgery were evaluated for the study. A retrospective review of charts was performed to assess whether readmission within 90 days was a direct consequence of the recent operation (unplanned related readmission). These patients were compared with a control group consisting of patients who were never readmitted or who were readmitted with an unrelated problem. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients, 59 (24 percent) were readmitted within 90 days of discharge from the hospital. Twenty-two (9 percent) were unplanned related readmissions. Ten patients were readmitted with unrelated emergencies, and 27 patients were readmitted electively. In the unplanned related group, there was no correlation between age, gender, admission diagnosis, activity status, or postoperative length of stay and the likelihood of readmission. Patients with multiple chronic medical problems or those who developed postoperative complications did not have a higher readmission rate. Patients with ulcerative colitis or those who underwent abdominoperineal resection or total/subtotal colectomy had a higher incidence of readmissions, although the difference was not significant. The mean interval between discharge from the hospital and readmission with a related complication was 19 days. Small-bowel obstruction was the most common reason for readmission, and all cases resolved with conservative management. Mean length of stay during all readmissions was 8 days. CONCLUSION: The incidence of unplanned related readmissions 90 days after abdominal or perineal colon resection is 9 percent, and these readmissions could not be predicted from the postoperative course. Because 82 percent of unplanned readmissions occurred within 30 days, this time frame is suitable for computerized comparative analysis.     

Laparoscopically-Assisted Resection Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: Ten Years’ Experience

PURPOSE This study has been undertaken to audit a single-center experience with laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The clinical outcomes and long-term results were evaluated.METHODS The data were prospectively collected for the duration of the operation, time to passage of flatus postoperatively, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. For follow-up, patients received a questionnaire or were contacted. The data were divided into quartiles over the study period, and the differences in operating time and length of hospital stay were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test.RESULTS Between March 1992 and October 2003, a total of 117 patients underwent laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. The median operating time during the first quartile (representing the early experience) was 180 minutes compared with 110 minutes for the fourth quartile (Kruskal-Wallis test for operating time = 35.523, 3 df, P < 0.0001). Overall morbidity was 9 percent (ten patients), with one death (<1 percent). One patient had a ureteric injury requiring conversion. One minor anastomotic leak occurred, necessitating laparoscopic evacuation of a pelvic abscess. Altogether, 77 patients were available for follow-up. The median follow-up was 62 months. Eighty percent of the patients reported alleviation of their symptoms after the operation. Sixty-nine percent of the constipated patients experienced an improvement in bowel frequency. No patient had new or worsening symptoms of constipation after surgery. Two (2.5 percent) patients had full-thickness rectal prolapse recurrence. Mucosal prolapse recurred in 14 (18 percent) patients. Anastomotic dilation was performed for stricture in five (4 percent) patients.CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse provides a favorable functional outcome and low recurrence rate. Shorter operating time is achieved with experience. The minimally invasive technique benefits should be considered when offering rectal prolapse patients a transabdominal approach for repair, and emphasis should now be on advanced training in the laparoscopic approach.Reprints are not available.Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004     

Long-Term Functional Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Rectopexy for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

Purpose  Laparoscopic rectopexy to treat full-thickness rectal prolapse has proven short-term benefits, but there is little long-term follow-up and functional outcome data available. Methods  Patients who had abdominal surgery for prolapse during a ten-year period were identified and interviewed to ascertain details of prolapse recurrence, constipation, incontinence, cosmesis, and satisfaction. Additional details on recurrences that required surgery and mortality were obtained from chart review and the State Death Registry. Results  Of 321 prolapse operations, laparoscopic rectopexy was performed in 126 patients, open rectopexy in 46, and resection rectopexy in 21 patients. At a median follow-up of five years after laparoscopic rectopexy, there were five (4 percent) confirmed full-thickness recurrences that required surgery. Actuarial recurrence rates of laparoscopic rectopexy were 6.9 percent at five years (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1–13.8 percent) and 10.8 percent at ten years (95 percent confidence interval, 0.9–20.1 percent). Seven patients underwent rubber band ligation for mucosal prolapse and seven required other surgical procedures. There was one recurrence after open rectopexy (2.4 percent) and one after resection rectopexy (4.7 percent), and there was no significant difference between groups. Overall constipation scores were not increased after laparoscopic rectopexy, with no significant difference to open rectopexy or resection rectopexy. Conclusions  This study has demonstrated that laparoscopic rectopexy has reliable long-term results for treating rectal prolapse, including low recurrence rates and no overall change in functional outcomes. Dr. Byrne was supported by the Notaras Fellowship from the University of Sydney, the Scientific Foundation of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and the training board of the Colorectal Society of Australasia. Presented at the Tripartite Colorectal meeting, Dublin, Ireland, July 5 to 7, 2005. Reprints are not available.     

Randomized clinical trial of local infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia vs. epidural analgesia following liver resection surgery

Objectives

Epidural analgesia is recommended for the provision of analgesia following major abdominal surgery. Continuous local anaesthetic wound infiltration may be an effective alternative. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to compare these two methods following open liver resection. The primary outcome was length of time required to fulfil criteria for discharge from hospital.

Methods

Patients undergoing open liver resection were randomized to receive either epidural (EP group) or local anaesthetic wound infiltration plus patient-controlled opiate analgesia (WI group) for the first 2 days postoperatively. All other care followed a standardized enhanced recovery protocol. Time to fulfil discharge criteria, pain scores, physical activity measurements and complications were recorded.

Results

Between August 2009 and July 2010, 65 patients were randomized to EP (n= 32) or WI (n= 33). The mean time required to fulfil discharge criteria was 4.5 days (range: 2.5–63.5 days) in the WI group and 6.0 days (range: 3.0–42.5 days) in the EP group (P= 0.044). During the first 48 h following surgery, pain scores were significantly lower in the EP group both at rest and on movement. Resting pain scores within both groups were rated as mild (range: 0–3). There was no significant difference between the groups in time to first mobilization or overall complication rate (48.5% in the WI group vs. 58.1% in the EP group; P= 0.443).

Conclusions

Local anaesthetic wound infiltration combined with patient-controlled opiate analgesia reduces the length of time required to fulfil criteria for discharge from hospital compared with epidural analgesia following open liver resection. Epidural analgesia provides superior analgesia, but does not confer benefits in terms of faster mobilization or recovery.     

Fast tracking after Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy

OBJECTIVES: We streamlined our care using an algorithm for the postoperative care of patients who undergo Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy to try to reduce hospital stay to 7 days and maintain safety and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A consecutive series of 90 patients who underwent elective esophageal resection by one general thoracic surgeon were studied. An algorithm to guide postoperative care was used, featuring avoidance of the ICU, early ambulation, jejunal tube feeds starting on postoperative day (POD) 1, removal of nasogastric tube and epidural on POD 3, a gastrograffin swallow on PODs 4 or 5, and discharge on POD 7. RESULTS: There were 90 patients (70 men). Fifty-two patients (58%) underwent preoperative radiation and chemotherapy. Esophagectomies were done for cancer or high-grade dysplasia. Forty-two of the last 55 patients (77%) went directly to the floor. Sixteen patients (17.7%) had major complications, which included pneumonia in 5 patients and aspiration pneumonia in 4 patients. There were no anastomotic leaks, and there were four operative deaths (4.4%). There was a greater incidence of failure to fast track, and to have a major complication in patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.025 and p = 0.048, respectively). Median hospital stay was 7 days (range, 6 to 74 days). Complications or mortality could not be definitively attributed to fast tracking. Ninety-seven percent reported excellent satisfaction with their hospital stay, and four patients were readmitted within 1 month of discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Fast tracking patients using an algorithm after esophageal resection is safe and delivers minimal morbidity and mortality, and a high patient satisfaction rate. A median hospital stay of 7 days is possible, and the ICU can be avoided in most patients.     

Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: Prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function

The effect of abdominal rectopexy on bowel function is difficult to assess in retrospective studies because preoperative bowel habit cannot be determined accurately. This study examined bowel symptoms and physiologic tests of anorectal function prospectively in 23 patients before and at three months after rectopexy. Rectopexy eliminated complete prolapse in all and stopped bleeding in 16 of 18 patients. Incontinence improved significantly. Constipation (<3 bowel actions per week or straining for more than 25 percent of defecation time) was relieved in 4 of 11 affected patients but developed in 5 of the 12 who were not constipated preoperatively. Since the median bowel frequency was 21 motions per week before surgery and 17 afterward, the main determinant of constipation was straining. Abdominal pain was relieved after rectopexy in 6 of 12 patients but developed in 3 of 13 who were pain-free before surgery. Three patients (13 percent) had a first-degree relative with rectal prolapse. Perineal descent decreased significantly. Maximal anal resting pressure increased significantly, but this did not correlate significantly with improved continence. Twenty-one patients (91 percent) could expel a 50-ml balloon preoperatively; 18 of those 21 could still do so postoperatively. The two patients who could not expel the balloon preoperatively were able to do so postoperatively. This study shows that rectal prolapse is associated with profoundly abnormal defecation and abdominal pain. While abdominal rectopexy improved continence, it may improve or worsen other bowel symptoms, including constipation.Support for this study was received from the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, ICI Pharmaceuticals (SA) Ltd., the St. Mark's Research Foundation, and the Medical Research Council of South Africa.     

Is epidural analgesia necessary after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy?

Most studies have shown that thoracic epidural analgesia reduces postoperative pain, but it carries potential risks. Recently, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has become an established technique that causes minimal postoperative pain. This report shows that thoracic epidural analgesia is not always necessary after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. From January to December 2007, 30 consecutive patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were examined retrospectively. We analyzed the necessity for routine thoracic epidural analgesia. The continuous subcutaneous analgesia catheter for morphine (2 mg in 48 h) was removed from 15 patients on postoperative day 1, and from the other 15 on day 2. We administered loxoprofen sodium hydrate, diclofenac sodium suppository, pentazocine hydrochloride, and mexiletine hydrochloride for postoperative analgesia, as needed. The mean pain score was no more than 1.0. The maximum score was 3.0 on day 0, and 2.0 on day 14; subsequently, no pain score exceeded 2.0. The postoperative hospital stay was 8.7 ± 0.8 days. All patients made uneventful postoperative recoveries. There is no need for thoracic epidural analgesia after every video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy because our patients recovered with no serious complication. Less invasive surgical approaches should require simpler postoperative pain management.