Risk of discontinuation of clopidogrel after 1 month following bare-metal stents: a propensity-score adjusted comparison with continued administration of clopidogrel after drug-eluting stents

In patients at high risk for bleeding undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) the use of bare-metal-stent (BMS) is considered an option that allows discontinuation of clopidogrel after 4 weeks. We sought to investigate the risk of early discontinuation of clopidogrel in patients with BMS as compared with a 6-month course of clopidogrel after DES in patients with or without high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). In 765 consecutive patients undergoing PCI after loading with clopidogrel 600 mg, HTPR was tested by optical aggregometry and defined as residual platelet reactivity?>?14%. On top of aspirin 100 mg, patients received clopidogrel 75 mg for 4 weeks after BMS or 6 months after DES. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) during 1 year. The 1-year incidence of death or MI was 3.5% with BMS (n?=?484), 0.9% with DES and no HTPR (n?=?211), and 7.1% with DES and HTPR (n?=?70; p?=?0.03). Landmark analyses for the first 6 months demonstrated that the risk of patients receiving BMS was similar as in patients receiving a DES with HTPR during this period (2.3 vs. 2.9%) but lowest in patients receiving a DES without HTPR (0.5%). The incidence of bleeding was similar in all three groups. These findings did not change after propensity score adjustment for stent type. After discontinuation of clopidogrel at 1 month, patients treated with BMS are at higher risk for death or MI than patients treated with a DES and sufficiently responding to clopidogrel planned for 6 months.ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00457236     

Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy

Although the safety profiles of coronary stents eluting sirolimus or paclitaxel do not seem to differ from those of bare metal stents in the short-to-medium term, concern has arisen about the potential for late stent thromboses related to delayed endothelialisation of the stent struts. We report four cases of angiographically-confirmed stent thrombosis that occurred late after elective implantation of polymer-based paxlitaxel-eluting (343 and 442 days) or sirolimus-eluting (335 and 375 days) stents, and resulted in myocardial infarction. All cases arose soon after antiplatelet therapy was interrupted. If confirmed in systematic long-term follow-up studies, our findings have potentially serious clinical implications.     

Long-term clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents in Chinese geriatric patients

Background & Objective Little is known about the relative efficacies of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome for geriatric patients who received either DES or BMS. Methods From January 2002 to October 2005, 199 consecutive Chinese geriatric patients (≥ 75 years old) underwent PCI with coronary DES or BMS implantation at our institution. We analyzed the major clinical end points that included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, and bleeding complications. Results The three-year cumulative rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction were significantly lower in the DES group (6.3%, 3.6%, 5.4%) compared with the BMS group (16.2%, 11.5%, 14.9%; P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the three-year cumulative rate for target lesion revascularization (6.3% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.61) or stent thrombosis (3.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.70). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in the cumulative rate for intracranial hemorrhage, or major and minor hemorrhage at three years. Conclusions DES-based PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the three-year cumulative rate of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction compared with BMS, without increased risk of TLR, stent thrombosis, or bleeding complications at three years in this group of Chinese geriatric patients.     

Late thrombosis following treatment of in-stent restenosis with drug-eluting stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.

Drug-eluting stent usage has become commonplace for the percutaneous treatment of de novo coronary lesions, but the safety and efficacy profile for their evolving usage in restenotic lesions is largely unknown. We report three cases of angiographically confirmed drug-eluting stent thrombosis following treatment of restenotic lesions that occurred late (193, 237, and 535 days) and shortly after interruption of antiplatelet therapy. All three patients suffered ST elevation myocardial infarction, and there was one death. Further studies are necessary to better define the associated risk and ideal duration of antiplatelet therapy necessary in this cohort of patients with restenotic lesions.     

Outcomes of stenting with overlapping drug-eluting stents versus overlapping drug-eluting and bare-metal stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary lesions

Introduction

We investigated the outcomes of stenting with overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) versus overlapping stenting with a combination of drug-eluting and bare metal stents (BMS) in very long ≥(≥ 25 mm).

Methods and Results

Fifty-two patients treated with either overlapping DES-DES (n = 22) or DES-BMS (n = 30) were selected from a registry of 588 patients with very long coronary lesions. Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) within the preceding 48 hours were excluded. The DES-DES combination was more frequently used for longer lesions compared with the DES-BMS group (47.95 ± 9.25 vs 39.98 ± 9.15 mm, p = 0.003). Left anterior descending artery lesions were also more frequently treated with the DES-DES combination (95.5 vs 66.7%, p = 0.02). In four patients in the DES-BMS group, overlapping stents were used for the coverage of dissections. Peri-procedural non-Q-wave MI occurred in one patient in the DES-BMS group. On follow up, only one case of non-fatal MI occurred in a patient with overlapping DES-DES.

Conclusion

Overlapping a BMS in the proximal part of a long DES instead of exclusive deployment of two or more overlapped DES seems to be a safe and feasible therapeutic strategy in our practice.     

Late loss of early benefit from drug-eluting stents when compared with bare-metal stents and coronary artery bypass surgery: 3 years follow-up of the ERACI III registry.

Aims: Long-term benefit from coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents (DES) relative to bare metal stents (BMS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not been established. One year follow-up of the ERACI III registry study showed better outcome with DES. To compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates in patients with multivessel cardiovascular disease (CVD) who received DES with those patients treated with BMS or CABG in the ERACI II trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with multivessel CVD who met the ERACI II trial, clinical and angiographic inclusion criteria were treated with DES and enrolled in the ERACI III registry. The primary endpoint was 3-year MACCE. ERACI III-DES patients (n = 225) were compared with the BMS (n = 225) and CABG (n = 225) arms of ERACI II. Patients treated with DES were older, more often smokers, more often high risk by euroSCORE and less frequently had unstable angina. They also had higher incidence of type C lesions and received more stents than the BMS-treated cohort. Three year MACCE was lower in ERACI III-DES (22.7%) than in ERACI II-BMS (29.8%, P = 0.015), mainly reflecting less target vessel revascularization (14.2 vs. 24.4%, P = 0.009). MACCE rates at 3 years were similar in DES and CABG-treated patients (22.7%, P = 1.0), in contrast to results at 1 year (12 vs. 19.6%, P = 0.038). MACCE rates in ERACI III-DES were higher in diabetics (RR 0.81, 0.66-0.99; P = 0.018). Death or non-fatal MI at 3 years trended higher in the DES (10.2%) than BMS cohort (6.2%, P = 0.08) and lower than in CABG patients (15.1%, P = 0.07). Sub-acute late-stent thrombosis (LST) (>30 days) occurred in nine DES patients and no BMS patients (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In patients with multivessel CVD, the initial advantage for PCI with DES over CABG observed at 1 year was not apparent by 3 years. Furthermore, despite continued lower incidence of MACCE, initial advantage over BMS appeared to decrease with time. LST occurred more frequent in DES-treated patients.     

Late angiographic stent thrombosis in a drug-eluting stent that occurred 20 months after premature discontinuation of clopidogrel administration

Late angiographic stent thrombosis (LAST) in a drug-eluting stent has been reported in several studies. Most LAST occur just after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. We report the first case of LAST that occurred 21 months after implantation of a Cypher stent and 20 months after discontinuation of clopidogrel, results that suggest a mechanism other than the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy might be responsible for LAST.     

Comparison of frequency of major adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents in their coronary arteries

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, the available evidence from clinical trial data are inconclusive. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the use of DESs versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in a consecutive real-world cohort of patients with AF. Of 8,962 unselected patients with AF seen in our institution from 2000 through 2010, 833 (9%) had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. BMSs were used for 678 patients (81%) and DESs for 155 (19%). During follow-up (median 688 days, interquartile range 1,114), all bleeding episodes, thromboembolism, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; i.e., death, acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) were recorded. Incidence of MACEs was similar in the 2 groups as was incidence of all-cause mortality. Results remained similar even after adjustment for age and other confounding factors. Factors independently associated with an increased risk of MACEs were older age (hazard ratio 1.024, 95% confidence interval 1.004 to 1.044, p = 0.02), implantation of stent during acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 2.99, p = 0.02), and stent diameter (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.18, p = 0.03). Implantation of DESs was not significantly associated with a higher risk of major bleeding and we observed a similar ratio of serious events at follow-up after DES compared to BMS implantation. In conclusion, in our cohort, systematic use of DESs does not seem to be justified in most patients with AF because it was not associated with any clear advantage compared to BMSs.     

药物洗脱球囊与第二代药物洗脱支架治疗药物支架内再狭窄的观察性研究

目的:对中国汉族人群中药物洗脱球囊(DEB)和第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)内再狭窄(ISR)的疗效进行非劣效性比较。方法:连续入选2014年9月至2015年8月,因DES-ISR而接受DEB或第二代DES治疗的患者,根据所接受的治疗策略将患者分别纳入DEB组和第二代DES组。记录两组患者住院期间主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率,并于术后12个月通过电话或门诊进行临床随访。结果:共纳入DES-ISR患者183例,包括DEB组74例,DES组109例;根据Mehran分型,非点状病变患者147例。住院期间两组患者均未发生MACE;(12.4±2.9)个月临床随访发现,DEB组共发生MACE 8例,包括心源性死亡1例、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)2例和靶血管血运重建(TVR)6例;第二代DES组MACE 3例,均为TVR。DEB组的MACE发生率高于第二代DES组(11.0%vs.2.8%,P=0.03),并且DEB组的无事件生存率劣于第二代DES组(89.0%vs.97.2%,P非劣效=0.94),而在非点状病变患者中,DEB组患者的无事件生存率仍劣于第二代DES组患者(87.9%vs.96.6%,P非劣效=0.92)。结论:药物洗脱球囊在中国汉族人群中治疗药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的疗效劣于第二代药物洗脱支架,且在非点状病变患者中仍劣于第二代药物洗脱支架。     

Late thrombosis of drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Purpose

Drug-eluting stents are commonly used for percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite excellent clinical efficacy, the association between drug-eluting stents and the risk for late thrombosis remains imprecisely defined.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis on 14 contemporary clinical trials that randomized 6675 patients to drug-eluting stents (paclitaxel or sirolimus) compared with bare metal stents. Eight of these trials have reported more than a year of clinical follow-up.

Results

The incidence of very late thrombosis (>1 year after the index procedure) was 5.0 events per 1000 drug-eluting stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (risk ratio [RR] = 5.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 19.52, P = .02). Among sirolimus trials, the incidence of very late thrombosis was 3.6 events per 1000 sirolimus stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (RR = 3.99, 95% CI, .45 to 35.62, P = .22). The median time of late sirolimus stent thrombosis was 15.5 months, whereas with bare metal stents it was 4 months. Among paclitaxel trials, the incidence of very late thrombosis was 5.9 events per 1000 paclitaxel stent patients, with no events in bare metal stent patients (RR = 5.72, 95% CI, 1.08 to 32.45, P = .049). The median time of late paclitaxel stent thrombosis was 18 months, whereas it was 3.5 months in bare metal stent patients.

Conclusions

Although the incidence of very late stent thrombosis more than 1 year after coronary revascularization is low, drug-eluting stents appear to increase the risk for late thrombosis. Although more of this risk was seen with paclitaxel stents, it remains possible that sirolimus stents similarly increase the risk for late thrombosis compared with bare metal stents.     

Impact of the metabolic syndrome on angiographic and clinical events after coronary intervention using bare-metal or sirolimus-eluting stents

Patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) are at increased risk for cardiovascular events. Although the number of patients with MS requiring coronary revascularization is increasing rapidly, the impact of MS on clinical events and restenosis in patients who undergo stent placement is not well defined. Seven hundred thirty-four consecutive patients with 734 de novo coronary lesions (<50 mm lesion length, reference vessel diameter <3.5 mm) were enrolled in this study. Four hundred thirty-seven patients were treated with bare-metal stents, and 297 patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Patients with bifurcation lesions, left main lesions, and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarctions were excluded from the study. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: those with (1) diabetes mellitus (DM), (2) MS without DM, and (3) no MS and no DM. MS was defined according to American Heart Association and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria (the presence of > or =3 of the following criteria: obesity, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and increased fasting glucose). Clinical follow-up was performed for > or =1 year (mean 27.5 +/- 18.1 months). One hundred sixty-four patients (22%) had DM, 180 patients (25%) had MS without DM, and 390 patients (53%) had no MS and no DM. Baseline clinical and angiographic parameters were comparable among the 3 groups, including lesion length and reference vessel diameter. In patients treated with bare-metal stents, the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 12 months were 14% in patients without DM or MS, 18% in those with MS but no DM, and 33% in those with DM (p = 0.046). In patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents, the MACE rates were 3% in patients without DM or MS, 4% in those with MS, and 13% in those with DM (p = 0.034). DM (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.48 to 3.07, p <0.001) and bare-metal stent (odds ratio 2.51, 95% confidence interval 1.49 to 4.22, p <0.001) implantation were independent predictors of MACEs during follow-up, whereas MS was not predictive. Similarly, MS was not a predictor of target lesion revascularization. In conclusion, patients with MS did not have an increased risk for target lesion revascularization or a greater MACE rate compared with control patients during a 12 month follow-up period after bare-metal or drug-eluting stent placement. In contrast, DM is associated with significantly increased event rates.     

Effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to synthesize the available evidence on the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents for bare-metal in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Although there is clinical evidence that drug-eluting stents are associated with better results than other treatments for in-stent restenosis, they are not yet approved for this indication. Meta-analysis of randomized trials may yield more precise estimates of treatment effects and enable a rapid adoption of effective treatments in clinical practice. METHODS: Data sources included PubMed and conference proceedings. Prespecified criteria were met by 4 randomized studies comparing sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents versus balloon angioplasty or vascular brachytherapy in 1,230 patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis. Studies reported the clinical outcomes of efficacy and safety during a minimum of 9 months. The primary outcome was target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: No significant heterogeneity was found across trials, thus showing a similar effect size regardless of the use of balloon angioplasty or vascular brachytherapy as comparators. The risk of target lesion revascularization (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.49; p < 0.001) and that of angiographic restenosis (odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.49; p = 0.001) were markedly lower in patients treated with drug-eluting stents. There were no differences between patients treated with drug-eluting stents and those treated with other techniques with respect to the composite of death or myocardial infarction (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.03; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Drug-eluting stents are markedly superior to conventional techniques (balloon angioplasty and vascular brachytherapy) and should be considered as first-line treatment for patients with bare-metal in-stent restenosis.