Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a new virtual colon dissection 3D visualization technique for CT colonography has a shorter analysis time and better sensitivity for detection of colonic polyps than interpretation of axial CT images. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. CT colonography was performed in 22 patients using 4-MDCT followed by conventional colonoscopy on the same day. The CT colonography data sets were analyzed by virtual colon dissection, which virtually bisects and unfolds the colon along its longitudinal axis to inspect the inner colonic surface for polyps. The same CT data sets were independently evaluated using axial interpretation. All data sets were independently interpreted by two radiologists in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed 31 colonic lesions in 20 patients. Twenty two of the lesions were smaller than 10 mm; nine were 10 mm or larger. Two of the original 22 patients were excluded, one because of residual stool and fluid and the other because of an impassable stenosing rectal wall cancer. For virtual colon dissection, the per-lesion sensitivity was 42% for observer 1 and 68% for observer 2; for axial interpretation, the respective sensitivities were 48% and 61%. For polyps 10 mm or larger, the respective sensitivities were 67% and 89% for virtual colon dissection and 89% and 100% for axial interpretation. The average time for reconstruction and analysis of virtual colon dissection was 36.8 min versus 29.2 min for axial images. Virtual colon dissection was feasible in both the supine and the prone positions in 45.5% of colonic segments, in either the supine or the prone position in 24.5%, and in neither position in 30% of segments. CONCLUSION: Although virtual colon dissection may facilitate detection of colonic polyps in isolated cases, its detection rate is not superior to axial interpretation, which is mainly attributable to failed rendering of insufficiently distended colonic segments or regions with residual feces. Virtual colon dissection is also the more time-consuming of the two procedures. With further improvement of path-finding and image segmentation, however, virtual colon dissection has the potential to be a useful interpretation tool for CT colonography.     

Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography

PURPOSE: To improve the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) colonography in the detection of polyps by comparing the 3D reconstruction tool "colon dissection" and endoluminal view (virtual colonoscopy) with axial 2D reconstructions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients (22 M, 26 F, mean age 57 +/- 21) were studied after intra-anal air insufflation in the supine and prone positions using a 16-slice helical CT (16 x 0.625 mm, pitch 1.7; detector rotation time 0.5 s; 160 mAs und 120 kV) and conventional colonoscopy. Two radiologists blinded to the results of the conventional colonoscopy analyzed the 3D reconstruction in virtual-endoscopy mode, in colon-dissection mode, and axial 2D slices. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy revealed a total of 35 polyps in 15 patients; 33 polyps were disclosed by CT methods. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting colon polyps were 94% and 94%, respectively, when using the "colon dissection", 89% and 94% when using "virtual endoscopy", and 62% and 100% when using axial 2D reconstruction. Sensitivity in relation to the diameter of colon polyps with "colon dissection", "virtual colonoscopy", and axial 2D-slices was: polyps with a diameter >5.0 mm, 100%, 100%, and 71%, respectively; polyps with a diameter of between 3 and 4.9 mm, 92%, 85%, and 46%; and polyps with a diameter < 3 mm, 89%, 78%, and 56%. The difference between "virtual endoscopy" and "colon dissection" in diagnosing polyps up to 4.9 mm in diameter was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: 3D reconstruction software "colon dissection" improves sensitivity of CT colonography compared with the endoluminal view.     

CT colonography using different reconstruction modi

OBJECTIVE: Performing computed tomography (CT) colonography, we compared different reconstruction modi for the detection of colorectal polyps. METHODS: The CT data of 48 patients using 16-slice helical CT were analysed in axial slices, virtual-endoscopy and colon-dissection modus. RESULTS: The sensitivity (specificity) for the detection of colonic polyps was 94% (80%) if using "colonic-dissection" tool and 89% (80%) if using "virtual-endoscopy" tool. The difference between the virtual endoscopy and colon dissection, considering polyps up to 4.9 mm, was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction software colon dissection improves the sensitivity of CT colonography.     

Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography

This retrospective study was institutional review board approved; the requirement for informed patient consent was waived. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare a two-dimensional (2D) data interpretation technique with a three-dimensional (3D) colon dissection technique in terms of interpretation time and sensitivity for colonic polyp detection, with colonoscopy as the reference standard. Ninety-six patients (56 men, 40 women; mean age, 54.8 years) underwent colonoscopy and multidetector computed tomographic (CT) colonography on the same day. Two radiologists independently analyzed the data on a per-polyp and per-patient basis. The sensitivity of both approaches was compared by using the McNemar test. The time required to interpret CT colonographic data with each technique was also assessed. Compared with the conventional 2D colonic polyp detection method, primary 3D interpretation with use of virtual dissection software for CT colonography revealed comparable per-polyp (77% and 69% for two readers) and per-patient (77% and 73% for two readers) sensitivities and comparable per-patient specificity (99% and 89% for two readers) for the detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger and involved a shorter interpretation time.     

Detection of flat colorectal polyps at screening CT colonography in comparison with conventional polypoid lesions

Background Although the screening of small, flat polyps is clinically important, the role of CT colonography (CTC) screening in their detection has not been thoroughly investigated. Purpose To evaluate the detection capability and usefulness of CTC in the screening of flat and polypoid lesions by comparing CTC with optic colonoscopy findings as the gold standard. Material and Methods We evaluated the CTC detection capability for flat colorectal polyps with a flat surface and a height not exceeding 3 mm (n = 42) by comparing to conventional polypoid lesions (n = 418) according to the polyp diameter. Four types of reconstruction images including multiplanar reconstruction, volume rendering, virtual gross pathology, and virtual endoscopic images were used for visual analysis. We compared the abilities of the four reconstructions for polyp visualization. Results Detection sensitivity for flat polyps was 31.3%, 44.4%, and 87.5% for lesions measuring 2-3 mm, 4-5 mm, and ≥6 mm, respectively; the corresponding sensitivity for polypoid lesions was 47.6%, 79.0%, and 91.7%. The overall sensitivity for flat lesions (47.6%) was significantly lower than polypoid lesions (64.1%). Virtual endoscopic imaging showed best visualization among the four reconstructions. Colon cancers were detected in eight patients by optic colonoscopy, and CTC detected colon cancers in all eight patients. Conclusion CTC using 64-row multidetector CT is useful for colon cancer screening to detect colorectal polyps while the detection of small, flat lesions is still challenging.     

64层螺旋CT在结肠病变中的临床应用价值

目的:探讨64层螺旋CT三维重建与仿真肠镜在结肠病变诊断中的应用价值。方法:应用Siemens Somatom 64层螺旋CT对83例患者行一次屏气全结肠容积扫描,并利用工作站进行后处理以获取CT仿真肠镜(CTVC),多平面重建(MPR),表面阴影成像(SSD)和透明显示(Raysum)图像,并结合原始横断面等图像进行分析,并与结肠镜或术后病理对照。结果:CTVC检出14例结肠镜确诊为正常结肠中的13例,1例误诊为结肠息肉。CTVC检出37例结直肠癌中的34例,敏感度为91.89%,特异度为92.86%,假阳性率为7.14%,假阴性率为8.11%。CTVC检出21例42枚结直肠息肉中38枚,敏感度为90.48%,特异度为92.86%,假阳性率为7.14%,假阴性率为9.52%。还包括:家族性腺瘤性息肉病2例,溃疡性结肠炎2例,节段性肠炎1例,子宫内膜异位1例,肠梗阻5例。结论:64层螺旋CT三维重建及仿真内镜对结直肠病变的诊断有其独特的优越性,为临床提供比纤维结肠镜更丰富的信息,很有必要广泛应用于临床。     

Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of and improve a computer algorithm to automatically detect colonic polyps in real human computed tomographic (CT) colonographic data sets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with known polyps underwent CT colonography in the supine position. CT colonographic data were processed by using a shape-based algorithm that depicts masses that protrude into the lumen. We studied nine shape criteria and three isosurface threshold settings. Results were compared with those of conventional colonoscopy performed the same day. RESULTS: There were 50 polyps (28 were > or =10 mm in size; 12, 5-9 mm; 10, <5 mm). The sensitivity with optimal settings for detecting polyps 10 mm or greater was 64% (18 of 28). Sensitivity improved to 71% (10 of 14) for polyps 10 mm or greater in well-distended colonic segments. Performance decreased for polyps less than 10 mm, poorly distended colonic segments, and other shape algorithms. There was a mean of six false-positive lesion sites per colon. These sites were reduced 39% to 3.5 per colon by sampling CT attenuation at the lesion site and discarding sites having attenuation less than a threshold. CONCLUSION: Automated detection of colonic polyps, especially clinically important large polyps, is feasible. Colonic distention is an important determinant of sensitivity. Further increases in sensitivity may be achieved by adding prone CT colonography.     

Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography

PURPOSE: To compare thin-section multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) colonography with conventional colonoscopy in the evaluation of colorectal polyps and cancer in asymptomatic average-risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight asymptomatic men (age > 50 years) scheduled to undergo screening colonoscopy were enrolled in this study. CT colonography was followed by conventional colonoscopy, performed on the same day. Supine and prone CT colonography were performed after colonic insufflation with room air. A gastroenterologist measured all polyps, which were categorized as 1-5, 6-9, or over 10 mm. Biopsy and histologic evaluation were performed of all polyps. CT colonography and colonoscopy results were compared for location, size, and morphology of detected lesions. Point estimates and 95% CIs were provided for specificity and sensitivity of CT by using results at conventional colonoscopy as the reference standard. RESULTS: At colonoscopy, 98 polyps were identified in 39 patients; 21 (21.4%) of 98 were detected at CT colonography. Sensitivity was 11.5% (nine of 78) for polyps 1-5 mm, 52.9% (nine of 17) for polyps 6-9 mm, and 100% (three of three) for polyps over 10 mm. Results at colonoscopy were normal in 29 (42.6%) of 68 patients; at CT colonography, results were correctly identified as normal in 26 of these 29 patients. In one of these patients, a lesion larger than 10 mm was detected at CT colonography. The per-patient specificity of CT was 89.7% (26 of 29; 95% CI: 72.7%, 97.8%). The mean time for CT image interpretation was 9 minutes. CONCLUSION: In patients at average risk for colorectal cancer, CT colonography is a sensitive and specific screening test for detecting polyps 10 mm or larger; the sensitivity for detecting smaller polyps is decreased. Examination findings can be interpreted in a clinically feasible amount of time.     

Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics

Virtual colonoscopy (CT colonography) promises to become a primary method for colorectal cancer screening and return radiologists to a major role in colon cancer prevention. Results from major centers in the United States show accuracy to be comparable to conventional colonoscopy for detection of polyps of significant size--that is, greater than 10 mm--with few false-positives. The advent of virtual colonoscopy has also heightened awareness of the natural history of colonic polyps, particularly in terms of identifying an appropriate target size for detection in colorectal screening programs. Small polyps (<10 mm) are often either hyperplastic on histology or are unlikely to progress to frank cancer in the patient's lifetime and are therefore of little clinical significance for the average adult. Thus, the rationale for detecting and removing each and every colonic polyp regardless of size has come under increasing scrutiny in the context of cost-benefit analysis of various test strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Virtual colonoscopy may allow patients to obtain reliable information about the status of their colonic mucosa noninvasively and thus make a more informed decision as to whether to proceed to conventional colonoscopy for polypectomy.     

Subtraction CT colonography: feasibility in an animal model

AIM: To determine, in an in vitro animal model, the feasibility of subtracting residual faecal material, during virtual colonoscopy, by uniform mixing of the colonic contents with barium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Segments of animal colon containing simulated soft-tissue polyps, measuring 3-10 mm, were filled with a faecal substitute consisting of a barium and peanut butter mix that had an attenuation value greater than 200 Hounsfield units. The colonic segments were then examined by CT using 3-10 mm beam collimations, and at pitch factors of 1 and 2. Using subtraction cut-off levels varying from 100-250 Hounsfield units, the barium and peanut butter mix was then subtracted to reveal the underlying polyps. RESULTS: Our optimal technical parameters required 3-mm beam collimation, a helical pitch factor of 2, reconstruction intervals of 3 mm, and a subtraction cut-off level of 150 Hounsfield units. The subtraction technique, in this animal model, had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 80% for polyps measuring greater than 3 mm. CONCLUSION: In this limited animal model, the subtraction technique utilized was technically feasible and had an acceptable sensitivity.     

Immediate CT pneumocolon for failed colonoscopy; comparison with routine pneumocolon

AIM: To assess the role and reliability of 2D CT pneumocolon in the diagnosis of colonic malignancy, and compare feasibility of referral sources.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 50 patients with suspected large bowel malignancy. Patients underwent bowel cleansing, rectal air insufflation and contrast enhanced CT with 5 mm collimation, 3 mm reconstruction and a pitch of 1.4. Subsequent correlation was with pathology (16), colonoscopy (13), barium enema (5), ERCP (1) and clinical follow-up alone (8).RESULTS: Diagnostic images were obtained in 43/50 patients (86% feasibility). Follow-up was obtained in 35/43 patients (one patient died of an unrelated cause, and seven patients were deemed unfit for further investigation). Seventeen colonic carcinomas were diagnosed (three false-positives: one ischaemic colitis, one diverticular stricture and one faecal mass), one diverticular stricture, one fistula, one pancreatic carcinoma and one ovarian malignancy. The remaining 14 were negative. Overall sensitivity was 100% (for lesions >1.5 cm) with a specificity of 94% for structural abnormalities, but only 82% for the correct identification of malignancy.CONCLUSION: Computed tomography (CT) pneumocolon is a reliable alternative to barium enema where colonoscopy is incomplete, with the advantage of extraluminal screening, and examination of the proximal bowel. In the frail elderly or young unfit patient, it is a valuable additional diagnostic tool.     

CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive technique for imaging the entire colon. Based on a helical thin-section CT of the cleansed and air-distended colon, two-dimensional and three-dimensional projections are used for image interpretation. Several clinical improvements in patient preparation, technical advances in CT, and new developments in evaluation software have allowed CTC to develop into a powerful diagnostic tool. It is already well established as a reliable diagnostic tool in symptomatic patients. Many experts currently consider CTC a comparable alternative to conventional colonoscopy, although there is still debate about its sensitivity for the detection of colonic polyps in a screening population. This article summarizes the main indications, the current techniques in patient preparation, data acquisition and data analysis as well as imaging features for common benign and malignant colorectal lesions.     

Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colonography for colorectal polyp and cancer detection by using colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred patients underwent CT colonography followed by standard colonoscopy. Bowel preparation consisted of magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol. After colonic air insufflation, patients underwent scanning in the supine and prone positions with 3-mm collimation during a single breath hold. The transverse CT images, sagittal and coronal reformations, and three-dimensional endoluminal images were interpreted by two radiologists independently, and then a consensus reading was performed. CT colonographic findings were correlated with standard colonoscopic and histologic findings. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for polyp detection were 90.1% (164 of 182) and 72.0% (85 of 118), respectively. By using direct polyp matching, the overall sensitivity was 69.7% (365 of 524). The sensitivity was 90% (74 of 82) for the detection of polyps 10 mm or larger, 80.1% (113 of 141) for polyps 5.0-9.9 mm, and 59.1% (178 of 301) for polyps smaller than 5 mm. The sensitivity was 94% (64 of 68) for the detection of adenomas 10 mm or larger, 82% (72 of 88) for adenomas 5.0-9.9 mm, and 66.9% (95 of 142) for adenomas smaller than 5 mm. CT colonography was used to identify all eight carcinomas. CONCLUSION: CT colonography has excellent sensitivity for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.     

Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies.

PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity of radiologist observers for detecting colonic polyps by using three different data review (display) modes for computed tomographic (CT) colonography, or "virtual colonoscopy." MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT colonographic data in a patient with a normal colon were used as base data for insertion of digitally synthesized polyps. Forty such polyps (3.5, 5, 7, and 10 mm in diameter) were randomly inserted in four copies of the base data. Axial CT studies, volume-rendered virtual endoscopic movies, and studies from a three-dimensional mode termed "panoramic endoscopy" were reviewed blindly and independently by two radiologists. RESULTS: Detection improved with increasing polyp size. Trends in sensitivity were dependent on whether all inserted lesions or only visible lesions were considered, because modes differed in how completely the colonic surface was depicted. For both reviewers and all polyps 7 mm or larger, panoramic endoscopy resulted in significantly greater sensitivity (90%) than did virtual endoscopy (68%, P = .014). For visible lesions only, the sensitivities were 85%, 81%, and 60% for one reader and 65%, 62%, and 28% for the other for virtual endoscopy, panoramic endoscopy, and axial CT, respectively. Three-dimensional displays were more sensitive than two-dimensional displays (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of panoramic endoscopy is higher than that of virtual endoscopy, because the former displays more of the colonic surface. Higher sensitivities for three-dimensional displays may justify the additional computation and review time.     

CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting

PURPOSE: To assess the methodologic quality of available data in published reports of computed tomographic (CT) colonography by performing systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched for colonography reports published between 1994 and 2003, without language restriction. The terms colonography, colography, CT colonoscopy, CT pneumocolon, virtual colonoscopy, and virtual endoscopy were used. Studies were selected if the focus was detection of colorectal polyps verified with within-subject reference colonoscopy by using key methodologic criteria based on information presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy (Boston, Mass). Two reviewers independently abstracted methodologic characteristics. Per-patient and per-polyp detection rates were extracted, and authors were contacted, when necessary. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity were calculated for different lesion size categories, and Forest plots were produced. Meta-analysis of paired sensitivity and specificity was conducted by using a hierarchical model that enabled estimation of summary receiver operating characteristic curves allowing for variation in diagnostic threshold, and the average operating point was calculated. Per-polyp sensitivity was also calculated. RESULTS: Of 1398 studies considered for inclusion, 24 met our criteria. There were 4181 patients with a study prevalence of abnormality of 15%-72%. Meta-analysis of 2610 patients, 206 of whom had large polyps, showed high per-patient average sensitivity (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%, 98%) and specificity (97%; 95% CI: 95%, 99%) for colonography; sensitivity and specificity decreased to 86% (95% CI: 75%, 93%) and 86% (95% CI: 76%, 93%), respectively, when the threshold was lowered to include medium polyps. When polyps of all sizes were included, studies were too heterogeneous in sensitivity (range, 45%-97%) and specificity (range, 26%-97%) to allow meaningful meta-analysis. Of 150 cancers, 144 were detected (sensitivity, 95.9%; 95% CI: 91.4%, 98.5%). Data reporting was frequently incomplete, with no generally accepted format. CONCLUSION: CT colonography seems sufficiently sensitive and specific in the detection of large and medium polyps; it is especially sensitive in the detection of symptomatic cancer. Studies are poorly reported, however, and the authors propose a minimum data set for study reporting.     

CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps

The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity, specificity, and postprocessing time of a colon dissection approach to regular 3D-endoluminal workup of computed tomography (CT) colonography for the detection of polypoid lesions. Twenty-one patients who had received conventional colonoscopy after CT colonography were selected; 18 patients had either colon polyps or colon cancer and three had no findings. CT colonography was performed using a 4-channel multi-detector-row (MDR) CT in ten cases and a 16-channel MDR-CT in 11 cases. A blinded reader retrospectively evaluated all colonographies using both viewing methods in a randomized order. Thirty-seven polyps were identified by optical colonoscopy. An overall per-lesion sensitivity of 47.1% for lesions smaller than 5 mm, 56.3% for lesions between 5 mm and 10 mm, and 75.0% for lesion larger than 10 mm was calculated using the colon dissection approach. This compared to an overall per-lesion sensitivity of 35.3% (<5 mm), 81.5% (5–10 mm), and 100.0% (>10 mm) using the endoluminal view. The average time consumption for CT colonography evaluation with the colon dissection software was 10 min versus 38 min using the endoluminal view. A colon dissection approach may provide a significant time advantage for evaluation of CT colonography while obtaining a high sensitivity. It is especially superior in the detection of lesions smaller than 5 mm.     

Role of CT virtual colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy in the evaluation of colonic polyps

Virtual colonoscopy is one of the recent advances in the field of CT post processing technique. It represents a type of 3D reconstruction technique which is capable of elaborating endoscopic endoluminal display of the colon without the use of real endoscope and hence it was named virtual colonoscopy. The aim of work is to evaluate the role of virtual colonoscopy in colonic polyps.     

Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography

PURPOSE: To optimize scanning parameters for virtual colonoscopy utilizing a multislice Helical CT scanner in an in vitro study (using a homemade colonic phantom) and in a preliminary clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A colonic phantom was built using a plastic tube and 12 plastiline polyps were placed inside. The colonic phantom was studied with a multislice Helical CT scanner. Axial images were obtained with the phantom parallel to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of ascending and descending colon): oblique images were acquired with the phantom at 45 degrees relative to the long axis of the moving table (in order to simulate the evaluation of sigmoid colon and colonic flexures). Four different scanning protocols were tested: 1) slice collimation, 5 mm; slice width, 7 mm; table speed, 25 mm; reconstruction index, 5 mm; 2) slice collimation, 2.5 mm; slice width, 3 mm; table speed, 15 mm; reconstruction index, 3 mm; 3) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 5 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm; 4) slice collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1.25 mm; table speed, 4 mm; reconstruction index, 1 mm. Quantitative analysis consisted in evaluation of the number of identified polyps and polyp size along the longitudinal axis. Qualitative analysis consisted in the evaluation of image artifacts and quality of 3D reconstructed images (step artifacts and polyp geometry distortion). This preliminary clinical study was performed in 12 patients (7 men and 5 women) who underwent multislice Helical CT colonography. We selected patients with clinical indications for conventional colonoscopy or after unsuccessful conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: Multislice Helical CT colonography was 100% sensitive in the detection of all polyps and in all scanning protocols. With oblique scans, only a 3-mm polyp was missed during protocol 1 (sensitivity: 92%). Polyp geometry distortion was observed on longitudinal reconstructions, whereas no distortion was seen on axial images. Image quality was graded as optimal for protocols 2, 3, and 4; protocol 1 was graded as good on transverse scans and as poor on oblique scans. In our preliminary clinical study, two colonic carcinomas and three polyps were identified. CONCLUSIONS: At present, the introduction of multislice technology in virtual colonoscopy permits to improve spatial resolution and image definition. The actual clinical advantage, in terms of increased diagnostic accuracy, needs further investigation in larger clinical studies.     

计算机辅助检测在结肠低剂量多层螺旋CT成像中的应用

目的 评估计算机辅助检测系统(CAD)设置不同的检测过滤器数值(SFV)时,在低剂量MSCT成像中对结肠病变的检测能力.方法 56例结肠癌和(或)结肠息肉患者行MSCT结肠成像扫描,依据结肠镜和外科手术结果,将病变分为4组:结肠癌、最长径≥10.0mm息肉、最长径5.1～9.9 mm息肉和最长径≤5.0 mm息肉,之后确定病变在CT图像上的部位及大小,作为评估结肠CAD系统检测病变的金标准.将CAD系统的SFV设为0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00共4个等级,分别检测CT结肠成像图像,记录CAD标注出的病灶的部位和大小,根据上述金标准评估CAD系统对结肠病变的检出率,采用x2检验比较不同SFV设置时CAD对各组病变的检出率.结果 56例患者共有159个阳性病灶,其中结肠癌为44个,最长径≥10.0mm息肉45个,最长径5.1～9.9 mm息肉32个,最长径≤5.0 mm息肉38个.将结肠CAD系统SFV分别设置为0.25、0.50、0.75和1.00时,病灶的检出率分别85.5%(136/159)、85.5%(136/159)、79.2%(126/159)和56.0%(89/159).SFV为0.25和0.50时,与SFV为1.00时,CAD对病灶检出率的差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).随着SFV数值的减低,病灶的检出率增高,假阳性数增加,但91.4%(138/151)～93.9%(31/33)的假阳性病灶很容易识别,仅有6.1%(2/33)～8.6%(13/151)的假阳性病灶,需借助MPR和3D仿真内镜识别.结论 在低剂量MSCT结肠成像中,结肠CAD系统可获得满意的病灶检出率,可调节CAD系统SFV数值,以便满足不同经验阅片者的需求.     

Virtual colonoscopy--chances for a screening procedure?

In principle, virtual colonoscopy is capable to be used as method for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), even if the accuracy of the method and radiation exposure are matters discussion in the radiological community. Virtual colonoscopy is able to detect any pathology which is relevant for early detection of CRC especially when using multislice CT, but also with single slice CT. The diagnosis of small lesions, less than 7 mm in diameter (polyps and flat lesions) is still problematic as it is in conventional colonoscopy. The exposure to x-rays in asymptomatic patients, without any increased risk of developing cancer is highly problematic and should be reduced to a minimum. Using special post processing filters on the volume dataset it can be shown that a tube current of 20 mAs is sufficient without any loss in accuracy. Measurements on the Alderson-phantom showed, that an effective dose exposure of 1.2 mSv is obtained using these reduced mAs values. It has to be differentiated between virtual colonoscopy for early detection of polyps and CRC in individual patients or as a screening examination of a large population. Virtual colonoscopy as a screening examination necessitates reduction of radiation dose, a high degree of automatization in 3D reconstructions as well as the assessment of the entire mucosa. High risk patients, whom refuse fibreoptic colonoscopy should undergo virtual colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy has a good chance to become an accepted tool for general screening, if efficient dose reduction, complete visualization of the colon mucosa and automatization of the post processing procedures can be achieved.