Feasibility of complex coronary intervention in combination with percutaneous aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic stenosis using percutaneous left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart®)

Coronary atherosclerosis is a common finding in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Indeed, aortic stenosis is associated with risk factors similar those of coronary atherosclerosis such as older age, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking. In light of the evolution of percutaneous aortic valve implantation (PAVI) and ongoing improvements in techniques of PCI, a combined approach using PCI and PAVI can be proposed for patients with complex coronary artery and aortic valve disease. This report describes the feasibility of the combination of percutaneous coronary intervention and percutaneous aortic valve implantation with peripheral left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart) support in 3 elderly patients with complex coronary altery disease and aortic stenosis considered too high risk for conventional surgical therapy. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

同时患有颈动脉和冠状动脉疾病的患者应先行颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术吗?

颈动脉与冠状动脉粥样硬化性病变常常并存.如何处理这2种病变,特别是为了降低围手术期卒中风险,是否有必要在冠状动脉旁路移植术前或同时对颈动脉病变进行治疗,在治疗颈动脉时支架置入血管成形术是否可取代颈动脉内膜切除术等,一直存在争论.文章就此进行了讨论.     

Novel approach to stenting the left anterior descending coronary artery through a retrograde approach via the left internal mammary artery graft in a patient with occlusion of the coronary ostium from a prior aortic valve replacement

Total occlusion of both coronary ostia is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication following surgical aortic valve replacement. This report presents a case of a patient with known total occlusion of both coronary artery ostia following combined coronary artery bypass graft surgery and aortic valve replacement who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention through a retrograde approach.     

Coronary artery disease and TAVI: Current evidence on a recurrent issue

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a frequent finding in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). Concomitant coronary artery bypass and aortic valve replacement is considered the gold standard treatment in surgical candidates. However, limited evidence is available regarding the role of coronary revascularization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). How to evaluate CAD severity in patients with AS, whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) needs to be performed and what is the timing for revascularization to minimize procedural risks, remains matters of debate. The aim of this review is to summarize epidemiology, diagnostic tools and possible options for CAD management in patients undergoing TAVI with specific focus on the pros and the cons of the different timing of PCI.     

Utility of the guideliner catheter for percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with prior transcatheter aortic valve replacement

The safety and utility of GuideLiner catheters in complex percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) has been well established. Patients with prior trans‐catheter aortic valve replacement especially with CoreValve, who present for PCI, pose a unique set of challenges. Not only does the operator often encounter difficulty with selective engagement of coronary ostia through the struts of the CoreValve, but also the complex nature of the underlying CAD in this high‐risk population. We present a case series to illustrate the use of GuideLiner catheter as an adjunctive tool for PCI in this patient population.     

Left circumflex artery injury postmitral valve surgery,single center experience

The left circumflex (LCX) artery is located close to the mitral valve (MV), making it susceptible to injury during MV surgery. We are reporting our experience in the diagnosis and management of this complication. We retrospectively reviewed our surgical and coronary angiography databases for patients with documented LCX artery injury during MV surgery between January 2000 and December 2016. The complication was associated with MV replacement (9/1313, 0.7%) but not MV repair (0/393, 0.0%). Eight patients (88.9%) were female and the mean age was 40.4?±?14.2?years. There was roughly similar distribution of left and right dominant coronary circulations (5 and 4 patients, respectively). Eight patients (88.9%) had ischemic changes on electrocardiogram and ventricular arrhythmias were documented on six patients (66.7%). Three patients (33.3%) were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention while six patients (66.7%) required redo surgery to graft the LCX artery. The 30-day mortality was high (33.3%). A high index of suspicion is required to diagnose this injury. At the moment, no consensus is available on the optimal treatment strategy. We propose percutaneous approach as the first option to spare the patients from undergoing open-heart surgery for the second time.     

Iatrogenic left main coronary artery stenosis following PTCA or valve replacement

We report three patients who developed iatrogenic severe left main coronary artery stenosis. In two, it was secondary to coronary cannulation during aortic valve replacement and in one it followed distention of the artery during balloon dilatation of a proximal lesion in the left anterior descending artery. In all three, the stenosis was clinically manifest a few months after the intervention. All were successfully treated by aortosaphenous coronary bypass. A common mechanism for the three cases may be mechanical distention of the left main coronary artery resulting in intimal damage with secondary fibrosis and stenosis. The percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty-related stenosis is, to our knowledge, the first reported case of this nature, and represents a previously unrecognized complication of this procedure.     

Percutaneous revascularization of left main

Refinement of interventional techniques, adjunctive pharmacological therapy, and the introduction of drug‐eluting stents have fostered new interest for the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. Several observational registries, some randomized trials and several meta‐analyses have consistently shown no difference in mortality and myocardial infarction between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with ULMCA stenosis, but a higher rate of target vessel revascularization in patients treated with PCI. As a consequence, PCI of ULMCA stenosis has been upgraded to class IIa or IIb indication in the current European or American practice guidelines. However, several critical issues should be properly addressed when pursuing a percutaneous strategy for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis, such as the use of IVUS for procedural guidance, assessment of disease location, optimal technique for distal ULMCA stenosis, risk of stent thrombosis, optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the most appropriate strategy for post‐procedure follow up. Multidisciplinary team approach remains essential to provide a balanced information to the patient and to offer the beast treatment option. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: an algorithm for percutaneous management.

Coronary perforation is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention. The use of both atheroablative technologies for coronary intervention and adjunctive platelet glycoprotein blockade pharmacology may increase the incidence of or risk for life-threatening bleeding complications following the occurrence of coronary artery perforation. The interventional database for 6,214 percutaneous coronary interventions performed between January 1995 and June 1999 was analyzed. Hospital charts and cine angiograms for all patients identified in the database as having had coronary perforation were reviewed. Coronary perforation complicated 0.58% of all procedures and was more commonly observed in patients with a history of congestive heart failure and following use of atheroablative interventional technologies (2.8%). There was no association of abciximab therapy with either the incidence of or classification for coronary perforation. Adverse clinical outcomes (death, emergency surgical exploration) were related to the angiographic classification of perforation and were more frequently observed in patients who experienced a class 3 coronary perforation. These data suggest that specific clinical and procedural demographic factors are associated with the occurrence and severity of angiographic coronary perforation. An angiographic perforation class-specific algorithm for treatment of coronary perforation is proposed.     

Comparative outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetics vs non-diabetics with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.

AIMS: To determine the influence of diabetes on outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from 1 January 1996, to 31 August 2000, were divided into two groups based on whether or not they had diabetes, excluding patients with acute infarction or shock. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to estimate the association between diabetes and adverse events. One thousand one hundred and fifty-three post-coronary artery bypass grafting percutaneous coronary intervention patients were identified (326 diabetics and 827 non-diabetics). Diabetics were younger, more likely to have hypertension, heart failure, and lower ejection fraction. Procedural characteristics and angiographic and procedural success rates were similar. Diabetes was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence intervals 1.10-2.27). Diabetes did not have a significant effect on mortality in patients treated for single-territory coronary disease (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% confidence intervals 0.69-3.02), but did in patients with multi-territory disease (hazard ratio 1.79, 95% confidence intervals 1.16-2.76). However, in diabetics with multi-territory disease who were completely revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention, mortality was comparable to non-diabetics (hazard ratio 1.32, 95% confidence intervals 0.57-3.03). CONCLUSION: Among percutaneous coronary intervention patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting, diabetes portends an adverse prognosis.     

Revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: Strategy selection and systematic risk assessment

Refinement of interventional techniques, adjunctive pharmacological therapy, and the introduction of drug eluting stents have fostered new interest for the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis. Several observational registries, some randomized controlled trials and several meta‐analyses have consistently shown no difference in mortality and myocardial infarction between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients with ULMCA stenosis, but a higher rate of target vessel revascularization in patients treated with PCI. As a consequence, PCI of ULMCA stenosis has been upgraded to class IIa or IIb indication in the current European or American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines. Although these results are promising, they do not still represent enough evidence for extending PCI of ULMCA stenosis to current clinical practice. The EXCEL trial will address the value of PCI in relation to CABG for the treatment of ULMCA stenosis in more than 2000 patients. A major breakthrough of the SYNTAX trial has been the demonstration of an interaction between the coronary complexity and the revascularization strategy, suggesting that optimal risk stratification is a key element when deciding the best strategy of revascularization in this high‐risk group of patients. Multidisciplinary team approach remains essential to provide a balanced information to the patient and to offer the beast treatment option. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Bioprosthetic aortic valve leaflet disruption with high energy electrocautery to prevent coronary artery obstruction during valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well‐established for the treatment of bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis (AS) in high surgical risk patients. Coronary artery obstruction from displacement of the bioprosthetic valve leaflets during valve‐in‐valve (VIV) TAVR is a rare, but potentially fatal, complication. Recently, the bioprosthetic aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction (BASILICA) procedure was developed as a method for disrupting bioprosthetic leaflets in patients undergoing VIV TAVR at high risk for coronary obstruction. This case describes a successful VIV TAVR utilizing a simplified concept of the BASILICA technique in a patient where the full procedure could not be completed.     

A modified “Preclosure” technique after percutaneous aortic valve replacement

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of suture‐mediated closure devices using a modified “preclosure” technique for access site management after percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR). Background: PAVR using a retrograde transfemoral approach has recently evolved to an endovascular alternative to open surgery in high‐risk patients. However, large‐bore femoral artery access is required, commonly demanding surgical closure and general anesthesia. A truly percutaneous intervention would be desirable to reduce procedural complexity and diminish the need of vascular surgery and general anaesthesia. Methods: After direct puncture of the common femoral artery, three conventional suture‐mediated closure devices (6F Perclose) were deployed. The preloaded sutures were tied at the end of the procedure. If no immediate hemostasis was achieved, an additional device was deployed thereafter. Results: PAVR with percutaneous access site closure was attempted in 15 consecutive patients and could successfully be achieved in all patients allowing conscious sedation in all but three cases. Following complications occurred: one retroperitoneal bleeding caused by removal of the valve delivery sheath requiring surgical repair, as well as two cases of femoral and iliac artery dissection caused by delivery sheath introduction and treated by stenting and vascular surgery, respectively. Vascular surgery became only necessary due to total vessel occlusion after suture closure and remains the only closure‐related complication. However, treatment led to recovery in all patients. Conclusions: The modified “preclosure” technique is a feasible and safe method for hemostasis after PAVR improving procedural management and diminishing the need for general anesthesia. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Coronary Artery Perforation following PCI: An Interesting Finding into the Pericardial Space

Coronary artery perforation is a known complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and potentially life threatening. Normally, these perforations are small and localized. We report the successful surgical management of a coronary artery perforation following stent insertion with extrusion of an 8-cm endarterectomy length of the circumflex coronary artery with a brief review of the recent literature.     

Complications after Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Balloon‐Expandable Prosthesis: The Importance of Preventative Measures and Contingency Planning

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with balloon‐expandable Edwards‐SAPIEN valve was superior to standard therapy in inoperable patients and noninferior to surgical aortic valve replacement in high surgical‐risk, but operable patients, with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis in the randomized controlled PARTNER trial. Since the first case of TAVR with a balloon‐expandable valve in 2002, several groups have reported their experience with balloon‐expandable valves with high‐procedural success. In the United States, the balloon‐expandable Edwards‐SAPIEN valve is the only transcatheter heart valve approved by the FDA for commercial use. Moreover, this is only in high‐risk inoperable patients. Despite increasing experience with the TAVR procedure, it can be associated with complications, which can be technically challenging, even for an experienced operator. Complications associated with TAVR include vascular complications, valve malpositioning, regurgitation, embolization, coronary compromise, conduction abnormalities, stroke/transient ischemic attack, acute kidney injury, cardiac tamponade, and hemodynamic collapse. A thorough understanding of the procedure is essential for pre‐emptive planning for procedural complications and early identification and management of complications are necessary for procedural success. We hereby review our experience of transfemoral TAVR with balloon‐expandable valves, offer practical tips to maximize the likelihood of procedural success, describe pre‐emptive strategies to prevent peri‐procedural complications and bailout measures to manage them, should they occur. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Combined Surgical Treatment of Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease and Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patient with Concomitant Lipton’s R-III Type of Single Coronary Artery Anomaly

A single coronary artery is a very rare condition, commonly associated with other congenital anomalies. It could be generally considered as neither benign nor malignant form of congenital coronary artery anomalies since its pathophysiological and clinical implications grossly depend on different anatomical patterns defined by the site of origin and distribution of the branches. By presenting the patient who underwent successful coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement surgery in a presence of isolated single coronary artery, we intend to emphasize natural and procedural risks and distinguish casual from causal in this extremely rare clinical and surgical scenario.     

Simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy can be performed with low mortality rates

There is controversy over the best approach for patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease.1 Therapeutic strategies include isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), staged carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and CABG, reversed staged CEA and CABG, and simultaneous procedures under single anaesthesia.2Although reported experiences over three decades are available, combining CEA with CABG remains to be elucidated.3 Furthermore, risk of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), which is one of the major predictors of prognosis of CABG, has been reported to increase up to 14% in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis (> 80%).4-9Peri-operative neurological events such as stroke after CABG are the major neurological complications, which increase with age.10 The incidence of peri-operative stroke has been well documented at approximately 2% of all cardiac surgeries.11 Despite reduced overall complication rates over the years after CABG, the incidence of stroke remains relatively unchanged.10The aetiology of peri-operative stroke is multi-factorial including hypotension or hypoperfusion-induced reduced brain flow, atherosclerosis due to micro- or macro-embolisation, and intra- or extra-cranial vascular diseases.5 In addition, carotid artery disease is a critical factor; however, it is considered unlikely to be the only culprit for peri-operative strokes.12Although no consensus on the optimal management of patients with concomitant carotid and coronary artery disease has been reached,13 simultaneous CEA and CABG surgery is often associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity.14-17 In this study, we report our experience with simultaneous CEA and CABG surgery in our clinic in the light of data in the literature.     

经皮冠状动脉介入术联合微创瓣膜手术的杂交治疗

经皮冠状动脉介入术明显降低了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的病死率,微创瓣膜手术通过减少旁路搭桥和主动脉钳夹的时间,减少解剖学损伤,降低了患者的手术风险。对于高危患者,联合经皮冠状动脉介入术/微创瓣膜手术可减少手术风险和病死率。通过外科医生和内科介入医生的密切合作可给患者带来最佳的预后。     

药物洗脱支架年代无保护左主干病变血运重建策略的选择

冠状动脉旁路移植术一直被认为是治疗无保护左主干病变的金标准.近年来,由于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗技术及器械的迅速发展,特别是药物洗脱支架的广泛应用,使冠状动脉介入治疗术后由再狭窄导致的再次靶病变血运重建率明显降低,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变研究以及和冠状动脉旁路移植术疗效对比研究越来越多,并且显示药物洗脱支架对无保护左主干病变有良好的疗效,其安全性与冠状动脉旁路移植术相似,甚至在某些方面具有优势.现就近年来冠状动脉旁路移植术和冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干病变的研究进展做一综述,探讨在药物洗脱支架年代无保护左主干病变治疗策略的选择.     

Influence of coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention on mid‐term outcomes in patients with aortic valve stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BackgroundA high frequency of coronary artery disease (CAD) is reported in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the optimal management of CAD in these patients remains unknown.HypothesisWe hypothesis that AS patients with TAVI complicated by CAD have poor prognosis. His study evaluates the prognoses of patients with CAD and severe AS after TAVI.MethodsWe divided 186 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI into three groups: those with CAD involving the left main coronary (LM) or proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) lesion (the CAD[LADp] group), those with CAD not involving the LM or a LAD proximal lesion (the CAD[non‐LADp] group), and those without CAD (Non‐CAD group). Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.ResultsThe CAD[LADp] group showed a higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and all‐cause mortality than the other two groups (log‐rank p = .001 and p = .008, respectively). Even after adjustment for STS score and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before TAVI, CAD[LADp] remained associated with MACCE and all‐cause mortality. However, PCI for an LM or LAD proximal lesion pre‐TAVI did not reduce the risk of these outcomes.ConclusionsCAD with an LM or LAD proximal lesion is a strong independent predictor of mid‐term MACCEs and all‐cause mortality in patients with severe AS treated with TAVI. PCI before TAVI did not influence the outcomes.