Rape trauma syndrome – Time to open the floodgates?

The conviction rate in rape cases remains remarkably low, leading many to believe a new approach is needed to prosecuting such crimes. Many important steps have been taken in relation to the collection and retention of evidence and the setting up of specialist rape prosecutors, but important evidential weaknesses remain present in the system alongside Victorian attitudes to sexual conduct. The British Home Office is currently consulting on a number of measures, including the admissibility of evidence showing the presence of rape trauma syndrome. This paper examines the history of this controversial evidential debate.     

Intra vitam trauma pattern: changing the paradigm of forensic anthropology?

International Journal of Legal Medicine - This study aims to improve a previous study that reported new traits to characterize a perimortem fracture pattern in human long bones. This second study...     

Imaging of the thoracic and lumbar spine in a high volume level 1 trauma center: are reformatted images of the spine essential for screening in blunt trauma?

Reformatted CTs of the thoracic and lumbar spine (CT T/L) from CTs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT body) may be performed for screening the thoracolumbar spine in patients sustaining blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the rate of detection of spinal fractures on CTs of the body compared to the reformatted T/L spine. A secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether cases dictated by trainees improved fracture detection rate. We reviewed the records of 250 consecutive blunt trauma patients that received CTs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT body) with concurrent CT T/L reformats. Each report was reviewed to determine if there was a thoracolumbar fracture and whether a trainee had been involved in interpreting the CT body. If a fracture was identified on either report, then the number, type, and location of each fracture was documented. Sixty-nine fractures, from a total of 38 patients, were identified on either the CT of the body or the CT T/L. Sensitivity for CT body interpretations was 94 % (95 % CI: 86–98 %) compared to a 97 % (95 % CI: 89–100 %) sensitivity for the CT T/L (p > 0.5). Although the sensitivity was 97 % (95 % CI: 88–100 %) when a trainee was involved in interpreting the body CT, there was no statistically significant improvement. The results suggest that with careful scrutiny most spine fractures can be diagnosed on body CT images without the addition of spine reformats. The most commonly missed finding is an isolated non-displaced transverse process fracture, which does not require surgical intervention and does not alter clinical management. The results suggest that thin section reformats do not need to be routinely ordered in screening blunt trauma patients, unless a bony abnormality is identified on the thicker section body CT images.     

Heart disease vis-à-vis trauma

Virtually all forensic experts deal not only with criminal, suspicious, accidental and suicidal deaths, but are also confronted with a wide range of deaths where a significant natural element is revealed at autopsy. The assaulted victim that dies suddenly or unexpectedly from a stroke during or immediately succeeding the receipt of some non-fatal injuries, or otherwise suffers a clinically unexplained death, can pose far greater difficulties over causation than a gun-shot or a stabbing. This paper presents an analysis of the problem and an approach for determining the cause of death in cases of concurrent trauma with heart disease, and in cases with a substantial natural element of disease but exclusion of trauma. Relevant cases with history, autopsy findings, histopathological findings and toxicological findings are presented in order to illustrate the issue from a practical angle.     

Blunt trauma to the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: is there a role for helical CT in the decision-making process?

The CT diagnosis of bowel and mesenteric injuries is difficult and warrants optimal technique and skilled interpretation. We retrospectively reviewed 36 consecutive patients with blunt traumatic injuries to the bowel and mesentery at our regional level I trauma center during the past 3 years. Physical examination, laboratory, Computed tomographic (CT), and intraoperative findings were compared. Surgically proven bowel injuries (13 cases) occurred in the duodenum (three cases), ileum (two cases), jejunum (two cases), colon (three cases), and stomach (three cases). CT findings considered specific of bowel rupture were observed in 5/13 patients including: extraluminal oral contrast or luminal content extravasation (four cases) and discontinuity of hollow viscus wall (one case). In the remaining 8/13 CT findings considered suggestive of bowel injury consisted of: pneumoperitoneum (six), gas bubbles close to the injured hollow viscus (three), thickened (>4-5mm) bowel wall (five), bowel wall hematoma (three), intraperitoneal fluid of unknown source (three). Mesenteric injury (23 cases) were surgically observed at the level of the mesenteric vessels (17 cases), legament of Treitz (two cases), gastro-duodenal artery (one case), transverse (one case) and sigmoid mesocolon (one case). CT finding considered specific of mesenteric laceration was active extravasation of contrast material from the mesenteric vessels (10 cases). CT findings suggestive of mesenteric injury (13 cases) consisted of: mesenteric hematoma (five) and/or high attenuation fluid collections, within the mesenteric root (eight) and folds (four). Helical CT is sensitive in the identification of bowel and mesenteric injury after blunt trauma providing a wide spectrum of findings. However, CT cannot be used as the sole indicator in cases with isolated thichened bowel wall, mesenteric hematoma, bowel hematoma, pneumoperitoneum or gas bubbles. Persistent, active extravasation of intravenous constrast medium from the mesenteric vessels, in isolation or associated with further injuries, requires immediate exploration and repair; disruption of bowel wall and extravasation of oral contrast are definite signs of bowel rupture. Close clinical observation, monitoring, and surgical expertise are mandatory for appropriate management.     

Pelvic imaging in the stable trauma patient: is the AP pelvic radiograph necessary when abdominopelvic CT shows no acute injury?

The purpose of the study was to determine the utility of anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs in stable trauma patients who will undergo or have undergone abdominopelvic CT as part of the initial trauma imaging evaluation. Radiology reports of all stable trauma patients who underwent both abdominopelvic CT and AP pelvic radiograph from 25 January through 30 April, 2003 were reviewed for findings of acute pelvic injuries. A total of 509 consecutive patients were included in this series. Of these, 449 patients (88.2%) had no acute pelvic injury revealed by abdominopelvic CT. CT showed 163 acute injuries in 60 patients. AP radiographs showed 132 acute injuries in 52 patients. No patients with a negative CT had an acute finding on the radiograph. There were eight false-negative pelvic radiographs (negative predictive value 98.25%). CT is highly accurate in excluding acute osseous pelvic injuries. In the stable trauma patient whose CT does not reveal an acute pelvic injury or who is scheduled to undergo an abdominopelvic CT as part of the initial imaging evaluation, the pelvic radiograph may be unnecessary.Comment Abstract originally presented at the American Society of Emergency Radiology 14th Annual Scientific Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, October 2003.     

Blunt splenic trauma: Can contrast enhanced sonography be used for the screening of delayed pseudoaneurysms?

Purpose

To assess the value of contrast-enhanced sonography (CES) for the detection of delayed post-traumatic splenic pseudo-aneurysms, usually considered an indication for angiographic embolization.

Methods

Sixty-three consecutive hemodynamically stable trauma patients in whom admission CT displayed a splenic injury of grade II or higher (AAST classification), without evidence of vascular involvement, were included in the study. CES of the spleen using a second generation contrast agent was systematically performed within 48–72 h after admission, for the detection of a pooling of contrast media suggestive of pseudoaneurysm. Within 6 h after contrast-enhanced sonography, all patients underwent an abdominal CT for control purposes. CES results were compared to CT findings, which were considered the reference standard. This study received approval from the institutional ethical board.

Results

CES showed a blush of contrast consistent with a pseudoaneurysm in 6 of the 63 patients. All were confirmed at subsequent control CT. Pooling of contrast was found at CT in 2 patients in whom contrast-enhanced sonography was negative. There was no false positive CES examination for the suspicion of pseudoaneurysms. When compared to CT, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CES to suggest a pseudoaneurysms, were 75% (6/8), 100% (55/55), 100% (6/6), and 96% (55/57), respectively.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that CES may be useful for the screening of delayed traumatic splenic pseudoaneurysms: if a negative CES does not absolutely rule out a pseudoaneurysm, a positive CES warrants an angiography, without need of control CT.     

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma: is vein imaging in vain?

Purpose

This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma.

Methods

CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18–89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together.

Results

Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%).

Conclusions

The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

     

Imaging of cervical spine trauma: are the anteroposterior and odontoid radiographs needed when CT of the entire cervical spine is routine?

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of the anteroposterior (AP) and odontoid radiographs in cervical spine trauma when helical CT of the entire cervical spine is performed in routine screening. Methods: In part 1 of the study, 47 patients with cervical spine fracture (positive) and 92 patients without fracture (negative) were retrospectively assembled into a study population. For each patient, the lateral radiograph and the CT were evaluated for the presence or absence of fracture. The results were compared to the radiology report at the time of injury which was based on the lateral, AP, and odontoid radiographs plus the CT (gold standard). In part 2 of the study, the individual sensitivities of CT and each radiograph were determined by review of the 47 positive patients with the fracture locations known a priori. Results: In all 47 positive patients, the presence of fracture was correctly identified using only the lateral radiograph and the CT. In none of the 92 negative patients was the lateral radiograph plus CT incorrectly interpreted as positive for fracture. The sensitivities for fracture of CT, the lateral radiograph, the AP radiograph, and the odontoid radiograph were 100, 47, 28, and 18 % respectively. Conclusion: The AP and odontoid radiographs did not contribute to the evaluation of suspected cervical spine fracture when the lateral radiograph and helical CT of the entire cervical spine were performed in routine screening.     

Enteritis cystica profunda: is trauma the etiology? Interval development in the previously normal ileum: a case report and literature review

Although well described in the colon, enteritis cystica profunda is an extremely rare lesion of the small intestine with only a few cases documented in English medical literature. It is a benign condition most often associated with Crohn's disease or Peutz-Jeghers syndrome in the adult. It has been described presenting as ileoileal intussusception in the pediatric population. We report a case of enteritis cystica profunda found incidentally on exploratory laparotomy with evidence of interval development over a 5-month period confirming trauma as the etiology.     

One year's trauma mortality experience at Brooke Army Medical Center: is aeromedical transportation of trauma patients necessary?

The purpose of this study was to review whether air ambulance transportation of trauma patients to the Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) level I trauma center contributed to maintaining national mortality standards in the trauma care of these patients. Aeromedical transportation is considered a standard-of-care component of regional trauma systems throughout the United States. Pooled trauma database information from 792 consecutive ambulance-transported trauma patients received at BAMC during the fiscal year from October 1, 1995, to September 30, 1996, were reviewed. The 792 trauma patients were composed of 687 patients transported by ground ambulance and 105 patients who received helicopter aeromedical evacuation. Aeromedical evacuation was associated with increased levels of prehospital medical care and faster transportation than ground ambulance service. The mortality rates (immediate, early, and late deaths) of both ambulance groups were compared with national mortality standards using the internationally recognized Trauma and Injury Severity Score methodology, based on the Major Trauma Outcome Study in 1986 and validated in 1992. The Z test for independent populations demonstrated no statistically significant difference between BAMC trauma mortality rates for either ambulance group compared with national trauma mortality rates. The results suggest that aeromedical evacuation of the more severely injured patients farthest from the BAMC trauma center resulted in mortality rates that met national standards.     

Combined head and abdominal computed tomography for blunt trauma: which patients with minor head trauma benefit most?

The widespread availability of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and management of blunt trauma has created the possibility of overuse without clear indications. Some clinicians believe that patients with head injury, intoxication, and/or distracting injury have an unreliable abdominal examination and should undergo combined head and abdomen CT. The objective of this study was to evaluate which patients with minor head trauma benefit most from combined head and abdomen CT. Consecutive blunt trauma patients, with a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 14 or 15, who underwent concomitant head and abdomen CT upon admission to a level I trauma center over a 2-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, physical exam, hospital course, and radiological and laboratory findings were recorded. Patients were divided into four subgroups based upon the presence or absence of intracranial and/or intraabdominal injury detected by CT. Among the 1,478 blunt head trauma patients, only 18 (1%) patients had both head and abdominal injuries detected by combined CT. One-hundred twelve (8%) patients had only head injuries, and 131 (9%) had only intraabdominal injuries detected. Patients with a GCS of 14 were more likely to have isolated head injury [odds ratio (OR) 3.1, P=0.001], while those with loss of consciousness were more likely to have combined head and intraabdominal injury (OR 6.8, P=0.03) or isolated head injury (OR 1.7, P=0.02). Abdominal tenderness was associated with increased risk of isolated intraabdominal injury (OR 1.8, P=0.0015). Hematuria was associated with increased risk of combined head and intraabdominal injury (OR 8.3, P=0.0004) or isolated intraabdominal injury (OR 7.9, P=0.0001). Patients with loss of consciousness and/or GCS of 14 frequently undergo head CT. The addition of an abdomen CT scan in this patient population should be based on objective clinical criteria such as presence of abdominal tenderness and/or hematuria.This work was presented at the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, San Francisco, May 20, 2006.     

High-resolution ultrasound of the supraclavicular brachial plexus—can it improve therapeutic decisions in patients with plexus trauma?

Patients with major traumatic brachial plexus lesions benefit from early surgery, but they are seldom isolated by today’s diagnostic workup. Subjects with ambiguous findings after such workups usually undergo a trial of conservative treatment and those without improvement delayed surgery. Our study focuses on this problem. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of high-resolution ultrasound (HR-US) on patient recruitment for non-delayed surgery. Twelve patients after blunt shoulder trauma and standardized HR-US assessment who underwent plexus surgery were included in this prospective observational study. Thereby, a total of 168 plexus elements were evaluated. All findings were compared to electrophysiological data if available and tested statistically against the gold-standard, i.e., surgical validation. Major plexus lesions were correctly detected by HR-US in nine patients (20 plexus elements). In two patients (five plexus elements), the lesion was underestimated by HR-US in relation to the gold standard (surgical inspection). Our analysis showed a high positive (1.0) and an acceptable negative predictive value (0.92) for the grading of traumatic plexus lesions with HR-US. Based on HR-US findings alone, 9 of 11 patients with objective major lesions would have undergone early surgery. In conclusion, HR-US proved a valuable tool for the triage of patients with traumatic lesions into surgical and non-surgical candidates.     

Fatal pediatric head injury due to toppled television: Does the injury pattern overlap with abusive head trauma?

Pediatric head injuries can occur from abusive head trauma (AHT) or accidents. Accidental pediatric head injuries caused by cathode-ray tube televisions (CRTT) toppling have become a 'silent epidemic'. Differentiation between a fatal case of AHT and CRTT toppling could be vexing when the historical and scene evidence are subtle. A 2-year-old girl was found unresponsive in her house and could not be resuscitated. A 27" CRTT was found fallen from its stand onto the floor at the scene. The siblings report that the deceased was climbing on the television stand when it toppled. Autopsy revealed a spectrum of head injuries including, contusions, fractures, bilateral acute subdural hemorrhages, subarachnoid hemorrhages, brain contusion-lacerations and corpus callosal hemorrhages. Microscopy of the eyes revealed bilateral acute retinal hemorrhages. The cause of death was given as crushing injuries of head and brain. The skull fracture pattern is compatible with an accident causing crush injury due to the toppled CRTT rather than AHT. The injury pattern reconfirms that the head is the most vulnerable site in case of CRTT tipover. Although there may be an overlap between the injury pattern in AHT and in CRTT tipover cases, a careful evaluation of the history and scene and autopsy findings such as the crushing nature of the skull fractures and distribution of injury, can solve this problem.     

Quality use of diagnostic imaging in trauma,and the impact on emergency medical practice—a retrospective clinical audit

Purpose

The current study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of the decisions made to order diagnostic imaging for emergency trauma patients.

Methods

A retrospective audit of 642 clinical decisions for 370 non-consecutive trauma cases was conducted at a level 1 adult trauma centre. Radiographs and computed tomography investigations were compared for compliance with the American College of Radiology/European Society of Radiology (ACR/ESR) imaging guidelines. The non-compliant imaging orders were evaluated for the following medical officer ranks: Junior Medical Officer (JMO), Senior Resident Medical Officer (SRMO), Emergency Medicine Registrar (EMR) and Consultants/Career Medical Officer (CMO). The time of imaging order (day/evening or night shift), whether the imaging led to conservative or surgical patient management, and whether the imaging order decisions led to a change in the clinical management of the patient were also considered.

Results

Non-compliance with the ACR/ESR guidelines was low. At least half of non-compliant decisions made by each level of medical officer resulted in a change in patient management. In total, 11 (65%), 25 (53%), 12 (63%) and 11 (52%) of non-compliant imaging orders placed by JMOs, SRMOs, EMRs and Consultants, respectively, resulted in change of patient management. JMOs and SRMOs ordered a significantly higher proportion of non-compliant imaging studies for conservatively managed patients in comparison to surgically managed patients.

Conclusion

This study highlighted that most non-compliant imaging orders benefited the patient.