Safety and efficacy of peribulbar block as adjunct to general anaesthesia for paediatric ophthalmic surgery

METHODS: Fifty children (age 5-14 years, ASA I-II) undergoing elective ophthalmic surgery were chosen for the study. Of these, 25 received intravenous pethidine (control group) and 25 received a peribulbar block (block group) for perioperative analgesia, and were monitored intraoperatively and postoperatively by an investigator blinded to the analgesic technique. RESULTS: Intraoperative values of haemodynamic variables were significantly higher in the control group (P < 0.01). Requirement for intraoperative rescue analgesic and postoperative analgesia was higher in the control group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively). Children in the block group had lower postoperative pain scores at all times. Incidence of oculocardiac reflex was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the control group. Seventy-six percent of children in the control group had postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to 20% children in the block group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There were no complications related to the block. Peribulbar block appears to be a safe and useful analgesic technique for paediatric ophthalmic surgery.     

Articaine versus lidocaine plus bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery

Background. We compared the efficacy and safety of articaine2% with a mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% withouthyaluronidase for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. Method. In this double-blind randomized clinical study, 58 cataractpatients were allocated to receive either articaine 2% withepinephrine 1:200 000 or a mixture of equal parts of lidocaine2% with epinephrine 1.25:100 000 and bupivacaine 0.5%. Ocularand eyelid movement scores, the number of supplementary injections,total volume of solution used and pain and complications duringinjection and surgery were used as clinical end-points. Results. Articaine produced greater akinesia after 5 min (P=0.03).Eighteen patients (60%) in the articaine group and 26 (93%)in the lidocaine/bupivacaine group required a second injection(P=0.003). A third injection was needed by two patients (7%)in the articaine group and 12 (43%) in the lidocaine/bupivacainegroup (P=0.001). The total mean volume of local anaestheticrequired to achieve akinesia was mean 9.4 (SD 1.7) ml in thearticaine group and 11.28 (1.86) ml in the lidocaine/bupivacainegroup (P<0.001). Median pain score was lower in the articainegroup than in lidocaine/bupivacaine group during injection (P=0.004)and surgery (P=0.014). There was no difference between the groupsfor the incidence of complications. Conclusion. Articaine 2% without hyaluronidase is more advantageousthan a mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% withouthyaluronidase for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 231–4     

Comparison of 0.75% levobupivacaine with 0.75% racemic bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia

In a single centre, randomised, double-blind study 50 patients scheduled for intra-ocular surgery received 0.75% levobupivacaine or 0.75% racemic bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia. There were no significant differences in the mean (SD) volume of levobupivacaine (11 (2.7) ml) or racemic bupivacaine (10 (2.6) ml) required, time to satisfactory block (levobupivacaine-13 (5.6) min; racemic bupivacaine-11 (4.4) min), peri-operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. The safer side-effect profile of levobupivacaine may offer significant advantages in the elderly population undergoing cataract extraction in whom intercurrent disease is common.     

Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia

In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind study, we comparedthe efficacy of 2% articaine with that of a mixture of 0.5%bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataractsurgery, using a single medial canthus injection technique.Eighty-two patients were allocated randomly to receive 7–9 mlof a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine or an equalvolume of 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine. Hyaluronidase30 iu ml^–1 was added to both solutions. Thedegree of akinesia was scored 1, 5 and 10 min after theblock, at the end of surgery and at discharge from the day caseunit. Primary outcome measures were the difference in ocularmovement scores 5 min after block and the need for supplementaryinferolateral injections. There was greater akinesia in thearticaine group at 5 min (P=0.01). Ten patients (24%) inthe articaine group and 21 patients (51%) in the bupivacaine/lidocainegroup required a supplementary injection (P=0.02). The mean(SD) volume of local anaesthetic required to achieve adequateblock for surgery was 9.7 (2.1) ml in the articaine group and11.0 (2.2) ml in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group (P=0.01). Therewas a faster offset of akinesia after surgery in the articainegroup (P=0.01). There were no differences between groups inthe incidence of reported pain or of minor complications. Inour study, 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine wassafe and efficacious for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 584–7     

Comparison of L-bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine 2% with bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine 2% for peribulbar anaesthesia

Background. L-Bupivacaine has a safer side-effect profile thanbupivacaine. We compared the efficacy of a mixture of L-bupivacaine0.75% and lidocaine 2% with bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine2% for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery. Methods. Ninety patients were allocated randomly to receive8 ml of a mixture of equal parts of bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine2% or an equal volume of L-bupivacaine and lidocaine 2%. Hyaluronidase15 IU ml^–1 was added to both solutions. Results. There were significant differences between the groupsin clinical end-points. The median time at which the block wasadequate to start surgery was 4 min (interquartile range4–8 min) in the bupivacaine group and 8 min (5–12min) in the L-bupivacaine group (P=0.002). Median ocular andeyelid movement scores were similarly significantly decreasedin the bupivacaine group compared with the L-bupivacaine groupat all times (P0.03). There was no difference between groupsin the incidence of minor complications. Conclusions. A mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine 2%provides faster onset time than a mixture of L-bupivacaine 0.75%and lidocaine 2%. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 512–14     

Single injection peribulbar anaesthesia. Total upper eyelid drop as an end-point marker

A prospective, observer blinded study on 51 patients undergoing cataract surgery was conducted to assess Total Upper Eyelid Drop as a new end-point marker to single injection peribulbar block. At present, no such clinical marker exists to stop clinicians injecting more than necessary volumes of local anaesthetic and therefore to prevent dangerous increases in intra-ocular pressure. Using this technique, satisfactory ocular akinesia was achieved in 90% of eyes 10 min after injection. Operating conditions were satisfactory in 98% of cases. The mean (range) volume injected was 9.1 (4-15) ml. The mean increase in intra-ocular pressure immediately after injection was 6.9 mmHg, decreasing to 0.7 mmHg after 5 min without the application of ocular compression. We found a negative correlation between the increase in intra-ocular pressure and the volume of injection (p < 0.002), which has never previously been reported. We conclude that Total Upper Eyelid Drop is a reliable endpoint marker for producing satisfactory operating conditions for cataract surgery while minimising increases in intra-ocular pressure and its use may therefore avoid the risks associated with ocular compression.     

Postoperative oxygenation in the elderly following general or local anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery

Peripheral oxygen saturation was recorded on the pre-operative night (between 2400 and 0600 h), the immediate postoperative period (first 60 min) and the first postoperative night (2400 to 0600 h) in 18 elderly patients aged 70 years or over presenting for elective ophthalmic surgery. Nine patients had surgery performed under general anaesthesia employing muscle relaxants and controlled ventilation and nine under local anaesthesia using a peribulbar block. The median (interquartile range) percentage of time during which the patients had an oxygen saturation of less than 90% was 0 (0-0.2) and 0.04 (0-0.4) on the pre-operative night, 0.7 (0-1.4) and 0.3 (0-1.2) in the immediate postoperative period, and 0.05 (0-0.16) and 0 (0-0.3) on the postoperative night in the general and local anaesthesia patients respectively. There were no significant differences between general and local anaesthesia in respect of these data and the overall incidence of significant desaturation was low. The present study could not demonstrate any adverse effect of general anaesthesia on oxygen saturation in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery.     

A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia

In a single centre, randomised, double-blind study, 54 patients underwent intraocular surgery under peribulbar anaesthesia with either ropivacaine 1% or a mixture of bupivacaine 0.75% and lignocaine 2%, both with hyaluronidase 7.5 iu.ml-1. There were no significant differences in volume of anaesthetic required, time to onset of block, peri-operative pain scores or frequency of adverse events between the ropivacaine group and the lignocaine and bupivacaine group.     

Brainstem anesthesia presenting as contralateral third nerve palsy following peribulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery

Brainstem anesthesia is a serious complication that has been reported to occur more commonly with retrobulbar anesthesia compared to peribulbar anesthesia. We herein report a case of contralateral third nerve palsy following administration of peribulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery. Two hours after the surgery, the patient recovered completely without any residual neurological deficit. The importance of immediate recognition of clinical signs and symptoms of central spread of the local anesthetic and the mechanical factors of the block that could have contributed to this complication are discussed in this report.     

Comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine or midazolam-bupivacaine mixtures with plain bupivacaine for caudal anaesthesia in children

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intensity and effectiveness of 0.75 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.25% with the addition of fentanyl or midazolam for caudal block in children undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Seventy-five children were allocated randomly to three groups to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 microg.kg(-1) (group BF) or with midazolam 50 microg.kg(-1) (group BM) or bupivacaine alone (group B) after induction of anaesthesia. Haemodynamic parameters, degree of pain, additional analgesic requirements and side-effects were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean systolic arterial pressure at 10, 20, 30 min after caudal block was higher in group B compared with groups BF and BM. Mean intraoperative heart rate was lower in group BF than the other groups. Adequate analgesia was obtained in all patients (100%) in group BF, 23 patients (92%) in group BM and 21 patients (84%) in group B (P > 0.05). The time to recovery to an Aldrete score of 10 was significantly shorter in group B than group BM (P < 0.05). Although not significant, it was also shorter in group B than group BF. There was no difference in additional analgesic requirements between the groups in the first 24 h. Sedation score was higher in the midazolam group at 60 and 90 min postoperatively than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Caudal block with 0.75 ml.kg(-1) 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 microg.kg(-1) midazolam or 1 microg.kg(-1) fentanyl provides no further analgesic advantages to bupivacaine alone when administered immediately after induction of anaesthesia in children undergoing unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy.     

Randomized double-blind comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine-fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery

BACKGROUND: Early studies have suggested that ropivacaine causes less motor block than bupivacaine, which might be advantageous in spinal anaesthesia for short procedures. The aim of this study was to compare plain ropivacaine 10 mg and plain bupivacaine 10 mg, both with fentanyl 15 microg, for spinal anaesthesia in urological surgery. Methods: This was a prospective randomized double-blind study. After written informed consent had been obtained, 34 ASA I-III patients scheduled for urological surgery were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal injection of either plain ropivacaine 10 mg with fentanyl 15 microg (ropivacaine group) or plain bupivacaine 10 mg with fentanyl 15 microg (bupivacaine group) using a combined spinal-epidural technique. RESULTS: All patients achieved sensory block to the T10 dermatome or higher at 15 min after intrathecal injection. One patient in the ropivacaine group was excluded because of unexpectedly prolonged surgery. The primary outcome, the duration of motor block, was shorter in the ropivacaine group (median, 126 min; interquartile range, 93-162 min) compared with the bupivacaine group (median, 189 min; interquartile range, 157-234 min; difference between medians, 71 min; 95% confidence interval, 28-109 min; P = 0.003). The duration of complete motor block was also shorter in the ropivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine group. There was no difference in the onset time of motor block. The characteristics of sensory block and the haemodynamic changes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Plain ropivacaine 10 mg plus fentanyl 15 microg provided similar sensory anaesthesia, but with a shorter duration of motor block, compared with plain bupivacaine 10 mg plus fentanyl 15 microg when used for spinal anaesthesia in urological surgery.     

Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine with and without adrenaline following caudal anaesthesia in infants

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of adrenaline 1/400000 added to 0.25% bupivacaine significantly delays the systemic absorption of the drug from the caudal epidural space in young infants. METHODS: Fifteen infants less than 5 months of age undergoing minor lower abdominal procedures under a standardised general anaesthetic were randomised to receive a caudal block with either 0.25% plain bupivacaine 2.5 mg/kg (n=7) or bupivacaine 0.25% with 1/400000 adrenaline (n=8). Blood samples were drawn at 30, 60, 90, 180, 240 and 360 min according to the infant's weight and analysed for total and free bupivacaine concentrations using a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) technique. RESULTS: The total C(MAX) and T(MAX) were comparable in both groups. The total bupivacaine concentration at t=360 min was significantly higher in the "adrenaline" group compared to the "plain" group, i.e. a median (range) 742 ng/ml (372-1423 ng/ml) vs. 400.5 ng/ml (114-446 ng/ml), P=0.0080. The median "apparent" terminal half-life (t1/2) was significantly longer in the "adrenaline" group (363 min; range 238-537 min) compared to the "plain" group (n=6) (165 min; range 104-264 min), P=0.0087. The free bupivacaine concentrations (n=3 in both groups) ranged between 13 ng/ml and 52 ng/ml, corresponding to a percentage of free bupivacaine between 1.3% and 6.7%. CONCLUSION: The addition of 1/400.000 adrenaline prolongs the systemic absorption of caudally administered bupivacaine in infants less than 5 months of age.     

Use of a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine vs lignocaine alone for male circumcision under local anaesthesia in Rakai, Uganda

Study Type – Therapy (case control) Level of Evidence 3a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Local anaesthetic drugs block the generation and the conduction of nerve impulses, presumably by increasing the threshold for electrical excitation in the nerve by slowing the propagation of the nerve impulse, and by reducing the rate of rise of the action potential. Lignocaine/Lidocaine has a rapid onset action and an intermediate duration of efficacy whereas Bupivacaine has a slower onset of action with a long duration of efficacy. A combination of the two drugs creates a mixture that has a short onset of action together with a long duration of action both of which are desirable qualities in provision of effective local anaesthesia. Documenting whether use of lignocaine alone predisposes men to more pain during and after surgery will inform policy makers on the type of local anaesthesia to recommend for male circumcision, especially as circumcision programs roll out. This is important since pain has been associated with reduced acceptance of the male circumcision procedure and therefore can negatively influence male circumcision roll out programs.

OBJECTIVE

• ? To assess self‐reported pain control during and after surgery with a mixture of lignocaine and bupivacaine compared with lignocaine alone among male circumcision (MC) service recipients in Rakai, Uganda.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? The two formulations of local anaesthesia for MC were used alternatively at weekly intervals in 360 patients; 179 received lignocaine alone and 181 received the lignocaine and bupivacaine mixture (LBmix).
• ? The proportions of men reporting pain during or after surgery, and the need for additional anaesthesia during surgery were determined for the LBmix vs lignocaine using Poisson adjusted rate ratios (RRs).
• ? Characteristics including age, weight, surgeon (medical officer vs clinical officer), surgical method and duration of surgery were compared between the arms using two‐sample t‐tests and chi‐square tests.

RESULTS

• ? Patient and provider characteristics were comparable between the two anaesthetic groups.
• ? A higher proportion of patients reported pain during surgery in the lignocaine group (adjusted RR 11.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5–37.9, P < 0.001), required additional anaesthesia (adjusted RR 4.8, 95% CI 1.4–17.1, P= 0.015), and were more likely to report pain during the immediate postoperative period (adjusted RR 3.4, 95% CI 2.3–5.0, P < 0.001).
• ? These differences were particularly marked among patients with MC times longer than the median (adjusted RR 13.4, 95% CI 3.1–57.0, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

• ? The LBmix significantly reduced pain associated with MC and the need for additional anaesthesia during MC.

     

Postoperative recovery after general anaesthesia with and without retrobulbar block in retinal detachment surgery

This study was to determine whether general anaesthesia plus retrobulbar block would be a better anaesthetic technique than general anaesthesia alone in retinal detachment surgery. Twenty-eight patients were allocated randomly to either general anaesthesia with retrobulbar block or general anaesthesia alone. The anaesthetist involved was blinded as to whether a retrobulbar block was performed or not. Significantly fewer patients in the general anaesthesia plus block group complained of postoperative pain than patients in the general anaesthesia group (21.4% as compared with 64.3%, p less than 0.05). Those who received general anaesthesia plus block recovered significantly more rapidly than those receiving general anaesthesia alone. The time to opening of eyes on command (p less than 0.05), telling the correct date of birth (p less than 0.01), reaching a full recovery score (p less than 0.005) and performing a simple motor task (p less than 0.025) was shorter in patients with general anaesthesia plus block. Thus general anaesthesia plus retrobulbar block was superior to general anaesthesia alone in terms of pain and recovery after operation.     

Low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the suitability and impact of adding intrathecal fentanyl

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anaesthesia has been used for lower limb surgery with a stable cardiovascular state and a short recovery unit stay. We sought to test the suitability of low-dose bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a procedure hitherto performed under general anaesthesia. Furthermore, we hypothesized that adding intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine may improve the quality of anaesthesia. METHODS: We randomly allocated, through computer-generated randomization, 108 patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy to receive either 7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/ml alone or with the addition of 10 microg of fentanyl. Drugs were given at the L(2)-L(3) interspace with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The patients remained in this position for 10 min, after which the sensory and motor blocks were assessed. Intra-operative analgesic supplementation, when deemed necessary, was achieved with intravenous fentanyl boluses (25 microg). RESULTS: The sensory and motor blocks after intrathecal bupivacaine and bupivacaine-fentanyl were similar. Sensory block, in both groups, reached the fifth and eighth thoracic dermatomes on the operative and non-operative sides, respectively. Deep motor block occurred on the operative side in all patients and in nearly 50% of patients on the non-operative side. The patients in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group required less intra-operative and post-operative analgesics, and both patients and endoscopists were better satisfied. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated, for the first time, that intrathecal low-dose bupivacaine and fentanyl offers a reliable neuraxial block for patients subjected to percutaneous nephrolithotomy, with stable haemodynamics, good post-operative analgesia and acceptable patient and endoscopist satisfaction.     

Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine in peribulbar anaesthesia for cataract surgery

Peribulbar anaesthesia with 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine, both with hyaluronidase, was assessed in a prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 100 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 22 subjects. Akinesia of the globe developed slightly more rapidly in the ropivacaine group, but this difference was only statistically significant at 2 min after injection of the local anaesthetic. Lid akinesia was significantly more complete in the ropivacaine group. There were no differences between the groups with respect to peri-operative analgesia or duration of akinesia. The dose-adjusted maximum concentration of ropivacaine was approximately twice that of bupivacaine with significantly higher values of the area under the concentration-time curves. No drug-related adverse effects were observed. We conclude that there are no clinically significant differences in the quality of the sensory and motor block between 1% ropivacaine and 0.75% bupivacaine when used for peribulbar anaesthesia.     

Thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. Effects on pulmonary mechanics

BACKGROUND: A lasting impairment of pulmonary function is common after cardiac surgery. Pain from the sternotomy may contribute to the impairment. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) can efficiently relieve pain in the postoperative phase, but may also affect respiratory muscle function if local anaesthetics are used. We examined the effects of TEA on pulmonary function and ventilation at rest, before and after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS: Thirty patients scheduled for CABG were randomized to receive either general anaesthesia alone or general anaesthesia with TEA. Before and after the operation the patients were examined by respiratory inductive plethysmography and spirometric tests. RESULTS: Before the operation, TEA caused significant reductions in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1), maximal inspiratory (PImax) and expiratory (PEmax) pressure. The rib cage contribution to tidal volume decreased significantly but the co-ordination of the thoracic and abdominal movements remained essentially unaffected. Minute volume and respiratory frequency did not change significantly. On the first postoperative day a decrease in maximal breathing efforts was found in both groups. No differences between the groups in FVC, FEV1 and PImax were found, but PEmax was significantly greater in the TEA group. Despite the impairment, breathing at rest was largely normal in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A better pain-relief from TEA after CABG may improve the ability to cough by a greater expiratory muscle strength. FVC, FEV1, PImax and breathing at rest are not affected by TEA after cardiac surgery.     

Sedation as an alternative to general anaesthesia

Dental patients are generally in good health, the procedures are often short, and it is fear and anxiety about pain rather than the nature of the procedure that dictates the use of sedation or general anaesthesia. Indications and contra-indications for sedation, appropriate agents and techniques, and facilities and personnel needed for managing and monitoring patients are discussed. Safe and effective use of sedation in combination with local anaesthesia is a realistic alternative to general anaesthesia for many outpatient procedures.