Oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: an open randomized cress-over study

In an open, randomized cross-over study in 124 patients, we compared the efficacy, safety and patient preference of oral and subcutaneous sum triptan in the acute treatment of migraine. Patients were treated for 3 attacks or 3 months and then crossed over. Primary clinical efficacy was defined as a reduction in headache severity on a four-point self-rating scale from severe (3) or moderate (2) to mild (1) or none (0), or mild (1) to none (0). Efficacy was evaluated 2 h after the administration of subcutaneous and 4h after the administration of oral sumatriptan. Subcutaneous sumatriptan was significantly more effective than oral sumatriptan in relieving headache (over all three attacks 78% vs 61% improvement), improving clinical disability (55% vs 41 % improvement) and relieving nausea (69% vs 53%), vomiting (72% vs 32%) and phono- or photophobia (67% vs 49%). Median time to recurrence was shorter after subcutaneous (12.5 h) than after oral sumatriptan (18 h); the number of patients experiencing a recurrence was similar Patients reported more adverse events after subcutaneous sumatriptan (1.32 per attack) than after the oral form (0.85 per attack), but all adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and of short duration. Patient opinion was more often positive after subcutaneous sumatriptan. These results may be useful in counselling patients to choose between the available marketed formulations of sumatriptan.     

Risk factors for headache recurrence after sumatriptan: a study in 366 migraine patients

Headache recurrence (HR) is the major limitation of sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. The risk of HR is mainly patient dependent. We analyzed, in 366 migraine patients, clinical differences between patients who always have HR and patients who never have HR. We found remarkably few differences. HR more frequently occurred in patients with more severe attacks and longer untreated attack duration; in patients who experienced a sensation of a subclinically ongoing attack, despite headache relief after sumatriptan; and in females, mainly with menstruation-related migraine, most probably due to the more severe and longer lasting attacks these patients suffer, rather than due to hormonal factors. The incidence of HR was, among other factors, not related to the (other) clinical effects of sumatriptan, the timing of administration within the attack, the duration of use of sumatriptan, pharmacokinetic factors, or whether patients were experiencing HR after use of ergot alkaloids.     

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of subcutaneous sumatriptan in general practice

Objective. To evaluate the therapeutic response to sumatriptan in the acute migraine attack. Material and methods. Two hundred and thirty migraineurs diagnosed by their general practitioners in accordance with their usual practice were included in the study. The patients treated two migraine attacks at home by subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan or placebo for the first attack and the alternative medication, i.e. placebo or sumatriptan, for the second attack (crossover). Following treatment, a neurology resident interviewed and examined the patients, Results. When sumatriptan was compared to placebo, significantly more of the 209 evaluable patients reported headache relief at I h (56% vs 8%, p < 0.001) and 2 h (62% vs 15%, p < 0.001) after the first injection. Resolution of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia was significantly more common in patients on sumatriptan than in those on placebo ( p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The adverse events were usually transient and of mild or moderate severity; however, three patients withdrew due to adverse events. Ninety-five percent of patients evaluated by a neurology resident met the IHS criteria for migraine. Conclusion. In general practice, sumatriptan taken subcutaneously using an autoinjector at home was an effective and well tolerated acute treatment for migraine.     

Treatment of migraine attacks with intranasal alniditan:an open study

In this open phase-II clinical tolerability trial 17 neurologists enrolled a total of 112 patients and instructed them to administer a maximum of two doses of intranasal alniditan, a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, for the treatment of three consecutive migraine attacks of moderate to severe intensity. A second dose of the trial medication was allowed within 1-24 h after the first administration. At 1 h after intranasal administration, 70/103 (68%) patients had responded to treatment (reduction from severe or moderate headache before treatment to mild or no headache) after their first migraine attack, 65/94 (69%) after their second and 52/75 (71%) after their third. In 187/270 (69%) of all attacks, patients were considered responders at 1 h. The median time to onset of effect was 30 min. The migraine headache recurred in 44% (attack 1), 55% (attack 2) and 44% (attack 3) after 4-5 h. Sixty-eight per cent of the patients reported nasal irritation, 19% taste disturbance and 44% throat irritation. Alniditan 2 mg, administered via the intranasal route, was effective in relieving migraine headaches in over two-thirds of the patients at 1 h.     

Pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan tablets during and between migraine attacks

Gastric stasis during migraine attacks results in delayed absorption of several orally administered antimigraine agents. This study, as part of a larger trial, was conducted to examine the pharmacokinetics of rizatriptan tablets during and between migraine attacks. Participating patients met IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura, and suffered between one and eight migraines per month for the previous 6 months. In part 1 of the study, 21 patients were randomized to receive a single 5-mg tablet of rizatriptan or placebo in the migraine-free state. In part 2, the same patients were treated during migraine with rizatriptan 5-mg tablets (n=18) or placebo (n=3). Blood samples were obtained before dosing and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after dosing. The plasma concentration profile (ie, AUC_(0-∞), C_max, T_max) of rizatriptan 5-mg tablets administered during and between migraine attacks were comparable. The median T_max for rizatriptan between and during attacks was 1 hour, indicating rapid absorption even during a migraine attack. Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated and 67% of the patients experienced headache relief 2 hours postdose.     

Lack of antinociceptive activity of sumatriptan in rodents

The present study attempts to determine whether the novel anti-migraine drug sumatriptan has antinociceptive activity in rodents. Sumatriptan had little or no antinociceptive activity against a range of noxious stimuli and we therefore conclude that it is unlikely that the beneficial effects of the drug in treating migraine are due to a non-specific analgesic action.     

Early migraine intervention with sumatriptan 100 mg in patients with a history of nonresponse to sumatriptan 50 mg: an open-label, prospective study of multiple attacks

Background

Early treatment with sumatriptan tablets (50 and 100 mg) has been shown to be effective in retrospective and prospective study designs. Despite the efficacy of sumatriptan 50 mg and early intervention, however, some patients continue not to respond completely to this dose. New evidence with a scientific basis for early intervention suggests that some patients may need to treat early to prevent the establishment of central sensitization. Also, patients cite complete pain relief as the most important attribute of a migraine medication.

Objective

The primary objective of this study was to determine the 2-hour efficacy of sumatriptan 100 mg in achieving complete pain relief in patients with a history of nonresponse to sumatriptan 50 mg in an early-intervention treatment paradigm. Secondary end points included complete pain relief at 4 hours, consistency of complete relief in at least 2 of 3 attacks, sustained complete relief over 24 hours, satisfaction with the 100-mg dose, and relief of associated symptoms.

Methods

This open-label, prospective study was conducted at the Wesley Headache Clinic (Memphis, Tennessee). Male and female patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years who fulfilled International Headache Society classification criteria for migraine, and who had a documented history of nonresponse to sumatriptan 50 mg at 2 hours after dosing when treating in the early, mild-pain phase in at least 2 of 3 migraine attacks were eligible for the study. Patients were instructed to receive one 100-mg sumatriptan tablet at the earliest sign of pain, while still mild, in 3 subsequent migraine attacks. After each treated attack, patients were to record a detailed diary entry.

Results

Twenty patients (17 women, 3 men; mean age, 44 years) treated all 3 migraines during the early, mild-pain phase and completed the study. Of the 60 attacks treated, 48 (80%) were pain free at 2 hours, 56 (93%) were pain free at 4 hours, and 45 (75%) were pain free at 2 hours and continued to be pain free at 24 hours (sustained pain-free response). Sumatriptan 100 mg was well tolerated; none of the patients reported any adverse events.

Conclusions

In this study of migraineurs with a history of nonresponse to sumatriptan 50 mg at 2 hours after dosing in the early, mild-pain phase of migraine, increasing the dose of sumatriptan from 50 mg to 100 mg in the early-intervention paradigm, in most attacks complete pain relief was achieved for up to 24 hours. Because patients have indicated that becoming pain free was their therapeutic goal, based on the results of this study, physicians may want to consider increasing the dose of sumatriptan to 100 mg at the first sign of pain if the patient has consistently not responded to sumatriptan 50 mg in the early-intervention model.     

Transcranial Doppler in migraine attacks before and after treatment with oral zolmitriptan or sumatriptan

BACKGROUND: Intracranial blood flow velocity (BFV) changes in migraine have been studied fairly extensively. Although a number of investigations have been performed in migraineurs with nitroglycerin-induced attacks, there has been no reported transcranial study involving such attack treated with zolmitriptan or sumatriptan. METHODS: With ultrasound, we studied the BFV and pulsatility index (PI) changes in the middle cerebral artery in 45 symptom free, otherwise healthy, unmedicated patients with migraine without aura, and in 15 age- and sex-matched controls before nitroglycerin, at the time of maximum head pain induced by nitroglycerin and every 30 minutes for 2 hours after zolmitriptan (15 subjects) or sumatriptan (15 subjects) administration. Headache was rated on a 4-point scale. RESULTS: During headache attacks, BFV decreased significantly (36.7+/-3.3, 38.4+/-3.4, and 37.4+/-4 cm/sec, respectively, in the zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, and nontreated migraine groups, but not in the controls who were migraine free (P <.01). These abnormalities disappeared 1 hour after zolmitriptan or sumatriptan administration (49.7+/-3.7 and 48.9+/-3.9 cm/sec, respectively). There were no significant changes in PI. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that nitroglycerin-induced headache in individuals with migraine without aura is associated with BFV changes that are reversed by administration of an oral triptan.     

Effects of subcutaneous sumatriptan on plasma growth hormone concentrations in migraine patients

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity of 5-HT1D receptors in migraine using sumatriptan as a pharmacological probe. The drug stimulates the release of growth hormone (GH) and this effect may be used to explore the function of cerebral serotonergic systems in vivo. We administered sumatriptan and placebo to 15 migraineurs and to 10 controls. Blood samples were collected -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after injection. Placebo had no effect on hormone concentrations. Sumatriptan induced a significant (P<0.01) increase in GH concentrations both in migraine patients and healthy controls. The GH increase was not significantly different in the two groups. Our results suggest that cerebral serotonergic functions mediated by 5-HT1D receptors are not altered in migraine. Sumatriptan overuse could lead to adverse effects mediated by its neuroendocrine activity.     

Self-treatment of acute migraine with subcutaneous sumatriptan using an auto-injector device: comparison with customary treatment in an open, longitudinal study

In a multicenter open longitudinal clinical trial where 479 patients suffering from migraine with or without aura were recruited, patients treated at home one to three migraine attacks with their customary treatment, and subsequently, over a 3-month period, one to three migraine attacks with (5 mg sumatriptan sc using an auto-injector. The headache response to customary treatment was 19% at 1 h and 30.5% at 2 h, and was not significantly different when only attacks treated "adequately" according to accepted treatment recommendations were considered: 16% at 1 h and 35% at 2 h. In contrast, 69% and 82% of patients treated with 6 mg sumatriptan sc had mild headache or no headache at 1 and 2 h respectively, regardless of migraine type or duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Other migraine symptoms (nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia) were effectively treated with sumatriptan. Recurrence of migraine was observed in 31% of patients and was well controlled by a second injection of sumatriptan. It is concluded that 6 mg sumatriptan sc, self-administered using an auto-injector, is well tolerated and more effective than most currently used acute treatments for migraine in a population of severely affected patients consulting a neurologist.     

Decision making in migraine patients taking sumatriptan: an exploratory study

Until recently, much of the medical and psychological literature has examined and conceptualized the taking of medication from the viewpoint of adherence to or compliance with recommendations from health professionals. However, some authors have argued that medication taking is mostly determined by patient decision making. In order to investigate the factors and processes influencing the patient's decision to take or not take abortive therapy for migraines, 20 migraineurs (according to International Headache Society criteria) were asked, using a semistandardized interview, what factors influenced their decision to take or not take sumatriptan when they had a migraine. Qualitative analysis revealed a 2-stage decision-making process. First, the patient collects information from interoceptive and environmental cues (symptom monitoring) to predict whether the headache that is beginning will become a migraine. Then, if the patient decides it is a migraine, he or she weighs various factors to decide whether to take sumatriptan. These results are consistent with the current cognitive psychology literature on decision-making processes and could lead to significant improvements in understanding the process by which patients make decisions about taking sumatriptan and, ultimately, could lead to better patient education and more effective headache control. They also open a whole new field in the empirical investigation of medication-taking behavior.     

Oral sumatriptan for the acute treatment of probable migraine: first randomized, controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan tablets in adults who meet International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for probable migraine but who do not meet IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura. BACKGROUND: Headaches with some but not all of the features of migraine meet criteria for probable migraine, a form of migraine recognized by the IHS. Probable migraine attacks are also prevalent and frequently underdiagnosed. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Adults (18 to 65 years) with a 1-year history of headaches that met 2004 IHS criteria for probable migraine without aura (same operational definition as 1988 IHS migrainous disorder) were eligible for enrollment. All patients were triptan- and ergot-na?ve and had never been diagnosed with migraine. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to receive sumatriptan 25, 50, or 100 mg conventional tablets or matching placebo and were instructed to treat a single moderate or severe probable migraine attack. A post hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the population of patients who achieved headache relief sustained throughout the immediate posttreatment period. Patients who reported relief within 2 hours and subsequently lost headache relief within 4 hours were considered nonresponders. RESULTS: At 2 hours, more patients treated with sumatriptan achieved headache relief, the primary efficacy measure, compared with placebo, but differences only approached statistical significance for 100 mg (P= .053). The 2-hour headache relief rate in the sumatriptan 25 or 50 mg groups was not significantly different than placebo. The time to use of rescue was significantly shorter in the placebo group compared with the sumatriptan 100 mg group (P= .002). The time to use of rescue in the sumatriptan 25 or 50 mg groups was not significantly different than placebo. More patients treated with placebo (22%) lost headache relief within 4 hours compared with patients treated with sumatriptan 25 mg (17%), 50 mg (14%), or 100 mg (7%). A post hoc analysis demonstrated that at 2 hours, headache relief sustained through 4 hours (S 0-4 hours) was achieved in 44%, 49%, and 57% of patients treated with sumatriptan 25, 50, and 100 mg, respectively, compared with 34% of patients treated with placebo (P < .05 for sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg vs. placebo). All doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that oral sumatriptan may be effective and is well tolerated for the acute treatment of probable migraine without aura, however, the difference between sumatriptan and placebo was not statistically significant for the a priori defined primary endpoint.     

Early treatment of a migraine attack while pain is still mild increases the efficacy of sumatriptan

To investigate the hypothesis that early treatment of a migraine attack with sumatriptan, while pain is still mild, results in higher pain free rates in comparison to delayed treatment, when pain is at least moderate, we performed a prospective, controlled and open label study. Migraineurs with or without aura who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria recommended by the International Headache Society were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to either 'early' or 'late' treatment with sumatriptan 100 mg tablets. In the early treatment group significantly more patients were pain free at all times measured during two hours after dosing than in the late treatment group. Furthermore, patients in the early treatment group became pain free significantly sooner after dosing than patients who delayed treatment. It is concluded that migraineurs, who are able to differentiate between a migraine attack and other forms of headache, benefit from early intervention with sumatriptan 100 mg tablets.     

Treatment of cluster headache attacks with less than 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous (SQ) sumatriptan 6 mg is effective in the treatment of acute cluster headache attacks. However, patients sometimes benefit from a dose less than 6 mg. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, we designed a prospective open study to evaluate how many patients benefit from a dose less than 6 mg SQ sumatriptan. METHODS: We enrolled 81 consecutive patients with cluster headache and recorded their use of SQ sumatriptan and oxygen. Patients regularly using SQ sumatriptan 6 mg were advised to treat attacks with doses less than 6 mg and with oxygen. Efficacy and side effects of the different treatment options (6 mg, 3 mg, 2 mg, and oxygen) were evaluated. RESULTS: As a result, 74% of the patients using SQ sumatriptan 3 mg showed efficacy and 89% reported efficacy after 2 mg. Seventy-nine percent reported side effects after the use of SQ sumatriptan 6 mg (29% severe side effects). After the use of 2 mg SQ sumatriptan, only 50% of the patients reported side effects, none of these were classified as severe. Patients' preference was 41% for 6 mg sumatriptan, 28% for doses less than 6 mg, and 31% for oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sumatriptan in doses less than 6 mg can be effective in the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks. We suggest that patients should have experience in their individual efficacy of sumatriptan doses less than 6 mg.     

Long-term tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray in adolescent patients with migraine

OBJECTIVE: This 1-year, open-label, multicenter study was designed to assess the long-term tolerability and efficacy of sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg in adolescent patients with migraine. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in patients aged 12 to 17 years who were allowed to treat an unlimited number of migraines at severe, moderate, or mild pain intensity with sumatriptan nasal spray for up to 1 year. All patients started the study at the 20-mg dose of sumatriptan nasal spray. Dose could be adjusted downward to 5 mg at the discretion of the investigator to optimize therapy. RESULTS: A total of 484 adolescent migraineurs treated 4676 migraines with sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg (3593 during the first 6 months and 1083 during the second 6 months). A total of 3940 migraines and 699 migraines were treated with one and two 20-mg doses of sumatriptan nasal spray, respectively. Only 10 patients (treating 42 migraines) took the 5-mg dose of sumatriptan nasal spray. The overall percentage of migraines treated with either one 20-mg dose or one, two, or three 20-mg doses with at least 1 drug-related adverse event was 19%. The most common specific drug-related adverse event was unpleasant taste, reported in 17% of migraines. No other single drug-related adverse event was reported in more than 1% of migraines over the 1-year treatment period. When unpleasant taste was excluded from the adverse-event tabulations, the percentages of migraines with at least 1 drug-related adverse event after one or one, two, or three 20-mg doses declined to 4% and 3%, respectively. No patient experienced any drug-related changes in 12-lead ECGs, vital signs, or nasal assessments; and no clinically meaningful changes in clinical laboratory values were observed. Across all migraines with evaluable efficacy data (n=4334), headache relief was reported in 43% of migraines at 1 hour and in 59% at 2 hours after dosing with sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg. Of the 2561 migraines with headache relief 2 hours postdose, headache recurrence was reported within 24 hours of initial dosing in 7% of migraines. None of the efficacy or tolerability results varied as a function of time in the study (ie, first 6 months vs. second 6 months). CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan nasal spray 20 mg is generally well tolerated and may be beneficial during long-term use by adolescent migraineurs ages 12 to 17 years.     

Efficacy of phenazone in the treatment of acute migraine attacks: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

In this study we compared the efficacy of 1000 mg phenazone with that of placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 208 patients. The main target criterion was the number of patients with a pain reduction from severe or moderate to slight or no pain 2 h after taking the pain medication. The percentage of patients satisfying the main target criterion was 48.6% for phenazone and 27.2% (P < 0.05) for placebo. Freedom from pain after 2 h was reported by 27.6% with phenazone treatment and 13.6% (P < 0.05) with placebo. Compared with placebo, the phenazone treatment also resulted in a significant improvement in the associated migraine symptoms of nausea, phonophobia and photophobia. Of patients treated with phenazone 11.4%, and 5.8% of those treated with placebo reported adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to numbers of patients with adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The results show that phenazone at a dosage of 1000 mg is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.     

Sumatriptan and corneal reflexes in headache-free migraine patients: a randomized and placebo-controlled crossover study

A temporary sensitization of central trigeminal neurones in migraine patients during acute attacks has been described in previous studies using the electrically evoked nociceptive blink reflex. The cornea is innervated by small myelinated A-delta and unmyelinated C-fibres only. Stimulation with air puffs activates peripheral nociceptors and allows the investigation of peripheral trigeminal nerve structures. Our objective was to investigate whether corneal reflex examinations with air puff stimulation detect abnormalities in migraineurs during their pain-free interval and if the corneal reflex may be modulated by the administration of an oral triptan. After validation of the nociceptive air puff technique by investigating the corneal reflexes before and after a local anaesthesia of the cornea, we recorded corneal reflexes in 25 migraineurs during their pain-free period and 25 healthy controls before and after the oral administration of 100 mg sumatriptan in a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Baseline response areas under the curve (AUCs) and latencies of the R2 components of the corneal reflexes did not show any significant differences between patients and controls. Patients did not show any significant differences regarding their headache and non-headache side. The use of an oral triptan had no significant influence on latencies or AUCs in both patients and controls. Our data suggest that there is no facilitation of the trigeminal system in the headache-free interval among patients with migraine. The stable corneal reflexes after the oral administration of 100 mg sumatriptan suggest that there was no inhibition of the trigeminal system, both in patients during their headache-free period and in healthy controls.