Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of the laparoscopic approach to splenectomy, its application in patients with massive splenomegaly (splenic weight >or= 1000 g) remains controversial. In this study we evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly compared with open splenectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One surgeon applied the laparoscopic approach to splenectomy to all comers with massive splenomegaly, while other surgeons carried out the surgery through a laparotomy. The outcomes of the two approaches were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Results of continuous variables are shown as medians. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy between 2000 and 2005, and 13 underwent open splenectomy between 1996 and 2003. The two groups were comparable for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and splenic weight (1.3 vs. 1.1 kg). There was one conversion (6.6%) to open surgery. Although laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with significantly longer operating time (175 vs. 90 minutes, P < 0.001), it carried lower postoperative morbidity and mortality (13.3 vs. 30.8% and 0 vs. 7.7%, respectively). Laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with significantly lower total dose (29 vs. 264 mg morphine-equivalent, P < 0.0001) and duration of opiate usage (1 vs. 4 days, P < 0.0001); duration of parenteral hydration (24 vs. 96 hours, P = 0.006) and more rapid resumption of oral diet (24 vs. 72 hours, P = 0.017); and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (3 vs. 10 days, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to splenectomy for massive splenomegaly is feasible and safe. Despite a longer operating time, the postoperative recovery following laparoscopic splenectomy is smoother, with lower morbidity and shorter postoperative hospital stay compared with open splenectomy.     

Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the preferred operative approach for diseases involving normal-sized spleens. Our experience with laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of massive splenomegaly is presented. METHODS: A prospective review of patients undergoing LS for massive splenomegaly was conducted. Massive splenomegaly (MS) in adults was defined as a craniocaudal length >or=17 cm or a morcellated weight >or=600 g. In children, spleens measuring fourfold larger than normal for age were considered massive. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients with MS were treated with LS. The most common primary diagnoses were lymphoma and leukemia. Mean splenic length was 20 cm (15 to 27 cm), with weights ranging from 600 to 4,750 g. Twelve patients with supermassive splenomegaly (length >22 cm) required a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. There were no conversions to open surgery. Mean operating time was 171 minutes (90 to 369). Mean blood loss was 114 cc (<30 to 600 cc). Average length of stay was 2.3 days (1 to 16). Minor postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy in the setting of splenomegaly is safe and appears to minimize perioperative morbidity. In patients with supermassive splenomegaly, a hand-assisted laparoscopic approach may be required.     

手助腹腔镜及开腹脾切除巨脾的临床疗效比较

目的比较手助腹腔镜(HALS)和开腹切除(OP)巨脾的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2004年—2010年行脾切除术患者的临床资料,比较其中大于20 cm脾脏行HALS和OP的临床疗效。结果大于20 cm的巨脾切除术患者41例,21例为HALS手术,20例为开腹脾切除手术。HALS组的中转开腹率4.7%。HALS和OP组的平均出血量为227 mL和887 mL(P=0.01),平均输血为0和0.6单位(P<0.05)。HALS组的住院时间比OP显著为短(4.3 d vs.8.4 d)(P=0.001)。并发症发生率两者相比无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 HALS是一项安全和有效的巨脾(大于20 cm)切除技术。相比开腹脾切除其住院时间更短,出血及输血更少,是一种行之有效的替代方法。     

Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly in benign hematological diseases

Background

Laparoscopic splenectomy has become the standard of care for benign hematological disease affecting the spleen; its role in massive splenomegaly remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of laparoscopic splenectomies in terms of spleen size in a group of 83 patients of benign hematological diseases.

Methods

From July 2003 to December 2009, 83 patients underwent laparoscopic splenectomy for various benign hematological diseases. The data were recorded and analyzed in a retrospective manner. The patients were divided in to two groups according to the spleen weight; group I?<?2,000?g (n?=?54) and group II?>?2,000?g (n?=?29). Age, sex, hematological condition, operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion to open surgery, splenic weight, length of hospital stay, time to liquid diet, and morbidity were all recorded.

Results

Laparoscopic splenectomy was completed in 79 patients (95.2?%). Operative time (p?=?0.01) and estimated blood loss (p?=?0.001) was more in group II. The length of hospital stay (p?=?0.05) and the postoperative morbidity (p?=?0.001) also were significantly more in the second group. There was no mortality.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic splenectomy is possible and safe for massive splenomegaly in hematological disease (>2,000?g), but it needs longer operative time and hospital stay.     

Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly using a Lahey bag

BACKGROUND: Although the recent development of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has made the laparoscopic retraction of large spleens feasible, the laparoscopic removal of massively enlarged spleens (>1,000 g) remains a significant problem because these spleens do not fit into endoscopic bags. Consequently, in order to remove massive spleens either a large abdominal incision or morcellation of the spleen outside of an endoscopy bag is required. METHODS: Two patients, with spleens weighing 2,510 g and 1,720 g, underwent laparoscopic splenectomy using a hand port to ensure safe retraction. The massive spleen was placed into a Lahey bag that was inserted into the abdomen through the hand port site. While in the Lahey bag, the spleen was removed piecemeal through the hand port site. RESULTS: Both operations were completed laparoscopically without complications. The patients were discharged on postoperative day 2 and experienced minimal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The Lahey bag facilitates laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly as even the most massive spleens will fit into a Lahey bag. A massive spleen may be removed piecemeal from the Lahey bag through the small hand port incision without risking a large abdominal incision, splenosis, or the insertion of a morcellator.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy versus open splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: 20-year experience at a Canadian centre

Background

Multiple techniques for splenectomy are now employed and include open, laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy (HALS). Concerns regarding a purely laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly (> 20 cm) arise from potentially longer operative times, higher conversion rates and increased blood loss. The HALS technique offers the potential advantages of laparoscopy, with the added safety of having the surgeon’s hand in the abdomen during the operation. In this study, we compared the HALS technique to standard open splenectomy for the management of massive splenomegaly.

Methods

We reviewed all splenectomies performed at 5 hospitals in the greater Vancouver area between 1988 and 2007 for multiple demographic and outcome measures. Open splenectomies were compared with HALS procedures for spleens larger than 20 cm. Splenectomy reports without data on spleen size were excluded from the analysis. We performed Student t tests and Pearson χ² statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 217 splenectomies were analyzed. Of these, 39 splenectomies were performed for spleens larger than 20 cm. We compared the open splenectomy group (19 patients) with the HALS group (20 patients). There was a 5% conversion rate in the HALS group. Estimated blood loss (375 mL v. 935 mL, p = 0.08) and the mean (and standard deviation [SD]) transfusion rates (0.0 [SD 0.0] units v. 0.8 [SD 1.7] units, p = 0.06) were lower in the HALS group. Length of stay in hospital was significantly shorter in the HALS group (4.2 v. 8.9 d, p = 0.001). Complication rates were similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective technique for the management of spleens larger than 20 cm. The technique results in shorter hospital stays, and it is a good alternative to open splenectomy when treating patients with massive splenomegaly.     

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in children

BACKGROUND: The authors have reviewed their initial experience with laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) to identify the indications, success rate, and complications associated with this procedure compared with a series of children undergoing open splenectomy (OS) during the same time period. METHODS: The records of 51 children who underwent splenectomy from 1993 through 1998 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients aged 1 to 17 years (mean, 9.4 years) underwent LS for the following indications: ITP (n = 20), sickle cell disease or thalassemia (n = 6), hereditary spherocytosis (n = 5), other hematologic disorders (n = 4). Seventeen patients aged 2 to 17 years (mean, 11.8 years) underwent OS during the same time period for ITP (n = 4), sickle cell disease or thalassemia (n = 4), hereditary spherocytosis (n = 5), and other indications (n = 4). Concomitant cholecystectomy was performed in 4 of 35 LS and 4 of 17 OS. Accessory spleens were identified in 10 of 35 LS and 2 of 17 OS cases. Eleven spleens were enlarged in the LS group, and 8 were enlarged in the OS group. One LS required conversion to an open procedure because the spleen did not fit in the bag. No other cases were converted. Median estimated blood loss was 50 mL for both the LS and OS groups. The only intraoperative complication in the LS group was a splenic capsular tear, which had no effect on the successful laparoscopic removal of the spleen. No patient in either group required a blood transfusion. The LS patients had a shorter length of hospital stay (1.8 +/- 1 versus 4.0 +/- 1 day, P = .0001). Total hospital charges were not significantly different. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 40 months. One LS patient died 47 days postoperatively from unrelated causes. Two LS patients had recurrent ITP; accessory spleens were found in one and resected laparoscopically. CONCLUSION: LS in children can be performed safely with a low conversion rate (2.9%) and is associated with a shorter hospital stay and comparable total hospital cost when compared with OS.     

Refining the selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic splenectomy is considered the procedure of choice for patients with normal-sized spleens, the benefits are less clear in the presence of splenomegaly, which represents a heterogeneous patient population with a variety of underlying diseases. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic (LS) and open splenectomy (OS) for spleens between 15 and 25 cm in length in order to identify strategies for patient selection for the laparoscopic approach. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of concurrent patients undergoing splenectomy for splenomegaly (>15 cm in the long axis) from 2000 to 2005 were reviewed at two hospitals. At one hospital, LS was performed unless the spleen was >25 cm in length, while the other hospital used OS exclusively. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared for patients potentially eligible for LS. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) and were analyzed by using nonparametric tests. A value P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixty-five laparoscopic and 25 open splenectomies were performed at the two hospitals, of which 34 were for splenomegaly. Five open cases involved spleens >25 cm and were excluded, leaving 18 LS (13 hand assisted) and 11 OS for further analysis. The groups were similar in comorbidity score, spleen length, hematologic diagnosis, and intraoperative blood loss. The open group was younger, included more females, and had a shorter operative time. Time to oral intake (1 vs. 2 days; P = 0.04) and length of hospital stay (3 vs. 6 days; P = 0.01) were shorter in the LS group. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 (39%) LS and 6 (55%) OS patients (P = 0.47); these were major in 3 LS patients and 1 OS patient (P = 1.0). All 3 major complications after LS occurred in the 3 patients with myelofibrosis and involved a conversion or reoperation by laparotomy for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy confers benefit for most patients with splenomegaly between 15 and 25 cm, as it is associated with faster time to oral intake and a shorter hospital stay. Major morbidity after laparoscopic splenectomy was mostly related to surgery for myelofibrosis. These patients did not derive any benefit from the laparoscopic approach due to bleeding complications, requiring a conversion or relaparotomy.     

Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenomegaly

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy presents an advantage over open splenectomy, resulting in shorter hospital stay, decreased blood loss, and fewer operative and postoperative complications. Splenomegaly has long been considered a contraindication for laparoscopic splenectomy; however, in the hands of an experienced surgeon, this technique can be effectively applied to the treatment of splenomegaly. METHODS: Records for patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly between 2000 and 2003, performed by a single surgeon in three community-based hospitals, were reviewed and demographic, operative, and postoperative data compiled. Preoperative diagnoses included B cell lymphoma, hemolytic anemia, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. RESULTS: Seven patients underwent laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly during this time period. Splenic weights ranged from 410 to 3,100 g, and average operative time was 86.6 minutes. Estimated blood loss ranged from 50 to 350 ml; average hospital stay was 4.4 days. Two postoperative complications, ie, postoperative bleeding and superficial wound breakdown, were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy are effective methods for treatment of splenomegaly.     

巨脾切除术的技术要点

The spleen whose size reaches or exceeds third degree should be regarded as massive splenomegaly.Splenectomy for massive splenomegaly demands precise procedures.First,median incision on upper abdomen(or vertical rectus muscle splitting incision)and incision under left costal arch are preferred.Second,the spleen was freed and then 0.33 mg of epinephrine was injected via the splenic artery before splenic artery ligation.During the process,a cell saver helps to minimize blood loss and makes autoinfusion possible for patients with benign lesions.Third,preoperative administration of fibrinogen,platelet and essential styptieum combined with the cooperation between surgeons and anesthesi010gists are the key points of bloodless surgery which is important for the recovery of patients.Four common problems of splenectomy for massive splenomegaly should also be addressed,including operation discontinuance,perioperative hemorrhage,accessory injury and postoperative intractable fever.     

Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly

HYPOTHESIS: During the past 10 years, expertise with minimally invasive techniques has grown, leading to an increase in successful laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) even in the setting of massive and supramassive spleens. DESIGN: Retrospective series of patients who underwent splenectomy from November 1, 1995, to August 31, 2005. SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent elective splenectomy as their primary procedure (n = 111). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, spleen size and weight, conversion from LS to open splenectomy, postoperative length of stay, and perioperative complications and mortality. Massive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 17 cm or weight more than 600 g, and supramassive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 22 cm or weight more than 1600 g. RESULTS: Eighty-five (77%) of the 111 patients underwent LS. Of these 85 patients, 25 (29%) had massive or supramassive spleens. These accounted for 40% of LSs performed in 2004 and 50% in 2005. Despite this increase in giant spleens, the conversion rate for massive or supramassive spleens has declined from 33% prior to 1999 to 0% in 2004 and 2005. Since January 2004 at our institution, all of the massive or supramassive spleens have been removed with a laparoscopic approach. Patients with massive or supramassive spleens who underwent LS had no reoperations for bleeding or deaths and had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (mean postoperative length of stay, 3.8 days for patients who underwent LS vs 9.0 days for patients who underwent open splenectomy; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite conflicting reports regarding the safety of LS for massive splenomegaly, our data indicate that with increasing institutional experience, the laparoscopic approach is safe, shortens the length of stay, and improves mortality.     

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy in the pediatric population: a contemporary single-center experience

The purpose of this study was to compare a recent contemporaneous experience between laparoscopic (LS) and open (OS) splenectomy in children. All splenectomy cases between 1994 and 1999 at our institution were reviewed. The study included open and laparoscopic cases performed according to surgeon preference. Emergency splenectomies for trauma were excluded. The patient record was reviewed for the diagnosis, indications, postoperative length of stay, operative technique, postoperative complications, blood loss/blood transfusion, total amount of parenteral narcotics, and time to resumption of oral intake. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare measured differences for statistical significance. Between May 1994 and December 1999, 52 splenectomies were performed at Vanderbilt Children's Hospital. Of these, 45 were elective operations with 29 open and 16 laparoscopic procedures. During four OS and five LS operations a concomitant cholecystectomy was performed. The median patient age was 9.2 years (range 0.5 to 17.3). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of age, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, or estimated blood loss. There were no immediate postoperative complications in either group. There were no conversions from LS to OS. The mean duration of surgery was 264 minutes (LS) versus 169 minutes (OS) (P < 0.05). The average time to first oral intake was shorter in patients undergoing LS (1.1 vs 1.6 days, P < 0.05) and the mean postoperative length of stay was also shorter in the LS group (1.3 vs 3.1 days, P < 0.05). The use of postoperative intravenous narcotics (in morphine-equivalent doses) was significantly less in LS patients than in OS patients (7.5 mg or 0.15 mg/kg vs 46.9 mg or 1.5 mg/kg, P < 0.001), as was the need for PCA pump analgesia (90% in the OS group vs 25% in LS group, P < 0.01). Overall the average hospital charge (anesthesia fee, narcotics charge, and hospital room charge) was $5400 (range $4240-6250) in the OS group and $4950 (range $4450-6240) in the LS group (P < 0.05). Among the nine patients undergoing splenectomy with cholecystectomy, findings between the OS and LS groups were similar except for one late complication consisting of a diaphragmatic hernia in an LS patient. Both LS and OS with or without a concomitant procedure can be accomplished safely in children. LS appears to result in longer operative times but shorter lengths of stay, earlier first oral intake, and significantly fewer requirements for intravenous narcotics; all of these contribute to a reduction in hospital charges compared with the open operation.     

Handport-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy in massive splenomegaly

Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy of normal-sized spleens is performed with increasing frequency. By using a handport, which allows the intraperitoneal introduction of one surgeon's hand, massively enlarged spleens may also be extirpated via a laparopscopy-assisted technique. Methods: Seven patients (54–80 years) with massive splenomegaly (3.5–5.8 kg) underwent handport-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. All patients had spleens that extended beyond the umbilicus, hypersplenism, and discomfort in the upper left quadrant due to intractable hematological malignancy. Results: Both the operation and recovery were uneventful in five of the patients, but one patient had to be converted to an open procedure due to splenic damage and bleeding, and another was reoperated for hemorrhage from a trocar. The handport allowed splenic protection while the trocars were introduced and instruments changed. It also enabled splenic mobilization, particularly prior to stapling of the hilar structures and dissection of the upper splenic pole. Conclusions: Handport-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy seems to be a viable alternative for massive splenomegaly, but it requires further evaluation with respect to safety, efficacy, and indication. Received: 7 September 1999/Accepted: 12 March 2000/Online publication: 20 July 2000     

腹腔镜巨脾切除加断流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症

目的 探讨腹腔镜下巨脾切除加断流术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症(门脉高压)的可行性.方法 回顾分析2003年10月至2010年1月12例行腹腔镜巨脾切除加断流术患者的临床资料.结果 8例完全腹腔镜手术成功,4例中转开腹.12例患者手术时间190～470 min,平均350 min,术中出血200～2200 ml,平均1300ml.8例成功腹腔镜手术时间190～410 min,平均313 min,术中出血200～1700ml,平均700ml,术后排气时间3～5 d,术后10～20 d出院.结论 腹腔镜下巨脾切除加断流术治疗肝硬化门脉高压在条件充分的情况下是可行的,可作为肝硬化门脉高压患者的一种术式选择.     

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a comparative study

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is gaining wide acceptance as a safe, effective alternative to open splenectomy (OS) in the treatment of hematologic disorders in adult and pediatric patients, with low conversion rates and complications. The aim of this retrospective case-control study was to compare two cohorts of patients, with similar characteristics, who underwent OS or LS in a single institution. The medical records of the initial 20 consecutive patients who underwent LS were reviewed and compared with a control group of 28 patients undergoing OS, matched for age, gender, diagnosis, splenic size and weight, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Data were collected regarding operative time, blood loss, blood transfusions, pathologic findings, accessory spleen detection, complications, ileus duration, and postoperative hospital stay. Nineteen patients underwent attempted LS. One procedure (5%) was converted to OS for uncontrolled hilar bleeding. Accessory spleens were detected in two cases in the LS group compared with four cases in the OS group (14%). Mean operative time was 165 minutes (range: 100-240 minutes) for LS and 114 minutes (75-180 minutes) for OS (P < 0.001). In the LS group a regular diet was tolerated 36 hours (range: 24-48 hours) after surgery compared with 72 hours (range: 48-96 hours) for the OS group (P < 0.001), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.1 days (range: 3-8 days) for LS, compared with 8.1 days (range: 5-12 days) for OS (P < 0.001). No differences were observed in blood loss, complication rates, or transfusion requirements. Compared with OS, LS requires more operative time (showing a learning curve), is comparable in blood loss, transfusion requirements, complication rates, and detection of accessory spleens and appears to be superior in terms of return of bowel function and hospital stay.     

Is splenectomy for massive splenomegaly safe in children?

PURPOSE: To study and analyze the causes, etiology, morbidity, mortality and therapeutic value of splenectomy performed for massive splenomegaly in children. METHODS: The medical records of 115 children less than 18 years old who had splenectomy for various hematological disorders were reviewed. Twenty of them had splenectomy for massive splenomegaly (spleen weight > or =1,000 g). The records of these were reviewed for age at operation, gender, hematological diagnosis, indication for splenectomy, operative procedures, postoperative complications, and outcome. RESULTS: Twenty children had splenectomy for massive splenomegaly. There were 16 males and 4 females. Their ages ranged from 4 to 15 years (mean 11.2). Twelve had sickle cell disease, 5 had sickle-beta-thalassemia, 1 had beta-thalassemia major, 1 had thalassemia intermediate, and 1 had chronic myeloid leukemia. The indications for splenectomy were hypersplenism in 11, recurrent splenic sequestration crisis in 8, and splenic abscess in 1. The transfusion requirements in the patient with beta-thalassemia major decreased markedly postoperatively from 18 transfusions/year to only 4 transfusions/year; and for those with hypersplenism, there was a marked improvement in their blood parameters following splenectomy. The patient with thalassemia intermediate required no more blood transfusions. There was no mortality. The immediate postoperative morbidity was 10% for those with massive splenomegaly compared with 6.3% for those with splenomegaly <1,000 g. CONCLUSIONS: With good perioperative management, splenectomy in children with massive splenomegaly is both safe and effective.     

Laparoscopic and open splenectomy for splenomegaly secondary to liver cirrhosis: an evaluation of immunity

Objective

We sought to investigate the perioperative inflammatory response and immunological function of patients with portal hypertension-induced splenomegaly who underwent laparoscopic (LS) or open splenectomy (OS).

Methods

This prospective study investigated a total of 34 patients with splenomegaly due to portal hypertension who underwent either LS (n?=?18) or OS (n?=?16) between May 2009 and September 2010. Peripheral venous blood samples were taken from these patients prior to surgery and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, and 7. The perioperative clinical outcomes and immunological function results were analyzed and compared within each surgical group.

Results

The demographics of the two groups did not differ. The patients in the LS group experienced longer operating time, less intraoperative blood loss, earlier resumption of diet, and shorter postoperative hospital stay. Both the open and laparoscopic groups exhibited statistically significant differences in interleukin -6 and C-reactive protein levels, and total lymphocyte, CD4 T, and natural killer cell numbers on POD 1 and 3 compared with pre splenectomy. The immune responses in the LS group were significantly lower than those in the OS group. The LS group exhibited better preserved cellular immune response and faster recovery than the OS group on POD 7.

Conclusions

An examination of the inflammatory reaction and cellular immune response after LS and OS demonstrated that there are significant differences in the immune responses observed in the two groups. Further human studies are required to determine the permanent effects of LS on immune function.     

腹腔镜巨脾切除的适应证与外科疗效分析

目的探讨腹腔镜巨脾切除的适应证与手术疗效。方法对23例腹腔镜巨脾切除病例与53例腹腔镜普通大小脾脏切除及35例开腹巨脾切除病例的手术疗效进行比较。结果本组腹腔镜巨脾切除23例,其中3例同时行腹腔镜巨脾切除伴责门周围血管离断术,9例同时行胆囊切除术,无手术死亡,其中2例中转开腹。巨脾组和普通组相比,手术时间长[（142±29）min vs（92±18）min]和术中出血量多[（540±90）ml vs（210±80）ml]（P均〈0．05）．术后住院时间、腹腔引流置管时间、术后并发症和中转开腹率方面没有差异。巨脾组与开腹组相比,术后腹腔镜引流置管时间[（4．7±0．5）d vs（7．7±0．9）d]和术后住院时间[（5．7＋0．5）d vs（8．4±0．9）d]短,术后并发症少（4.3％vs11.4％）（P均〈0．05）,但术中出血和手术时间差异没有统计学意义。结论腹腔镜巨脾切除术安全可行．近期疗效良好。     

腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术治疗非创伤性脾脏疾病的疗效分析

目的：探讨腹腔镜脾切除术（laparoseopic splenectomy,LS）治疗非创伤性脾脏疾病的安全性、可行性及临床疗效。方法：回顾分析2009年6月至2013年1月收治的48例因非创伤性脾相关疾病行单纯性脾切除术患者的临床资料,其中23例行LS（LS组）,25例行开腹脾切除术（open splenectomy,OS）（SS组）,对比两组患者术中、术后情况,评价其手术疗效。结果：LS组中1例因术中出血中转开腹,余均顺利完成手术。LS组术中出血量、术后进食时间、术后住院时间、切口长度显著优于OS组（P〈0．05）,手术时间稍长于OS组。LS组术后发生并发症2例,术中切除副脾3例;OS组发生并发症9例．术中切除副脾4例。术后随访5—48个月,平均（22．0±10．4）个月,均无远期并发症发生。结论：在严格掌握手术适应证的前提下,LS治疗非创伤性脾脏疾病安全、有效,与传统开腹手术相比,具有患者创伤小、术后康复快、并发症少等优点,值得推广、应用。