18F-FDG符合线路显像在不明原发灶肿瘤中的临床价值

目的评价^18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)符合线路显像在不明原发灶肿瘤(UPT)中的临床价值。方法UPT患者36例，在^18F-FDG符合线路显像后4周内进行常规影像学检查。结果^18F-FDG符合线路显像对原发灶的检出灵敏度为42％(15／36例)；1例原发灶仅被^18F-FDG显像发现，3例首先被^18F-FDG显像发现，后在^18F-FDG显像结果的提示下被其他影像学检查发现，11例同时分别被^18F-FDG显像和常规影像学检查发现；14％(5／36例)患者因找到原发灶而改变了治疗方案；53％(19／36例)患者发现新的转移灶。结论^18F-FDG符合线路显像是寻找UPT原发灶的一种有效方法，并可同时评价患者的全身转移情况，可为选择最佳治疗方案和预后评价提供依据。     

18F-FDG PET for evaluation of bone marrow infiltration in staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysis.

The ability of PET with (18)F-FDG to evaluate bone marrow infiltration in patients with lymphoma has been a matter of extensive investigation with controversial results. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate systematically, with a meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET in this setting. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified with MEDLINE and EMBASE searches (last update, August 2004). Data on the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET were combined quantitatively across eligible studies. We estimated weighted summary sensitivities and specificities, summary receiver-operating-characteristic (SROC) curves, and weighted summary likelihood ratios. We also conducted separate analyses according to various subgroups. Bone marrow biopsy (BMB) was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible nonoverlapping studies, which enrolled a total of 587 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The independent random-effects weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity against BMB were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-64%) and 91% (95% CI, 85%-95%), respectively. Results were consistent in the SROC curve: a sensitivity of 51% corresponds to a specificity of 92%, whereas a specificity of 91% corresponds to a sensitivity of 55%. The weighted positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 5.75 (95% CI, 348-9.48) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.82). Six of 12 patients with positive (18)F-FDG PET and negative initial biopsy were found to have bone marrow involvement when biopsy was performed at the sites with positive imaging signals. Subgroup analyses showed better sensitivity in patients with Hodgkin's disease and in aggressive histologic types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma than in patients with less aggressive histologic types and in studies using unilateral BMB compared with those using bilateral biopsy. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that (18)F-FDG PET has good, but not excellent, concordance with the results of BMB for the detection of bone marrow infiltration in the staging of patients with lymphoma. (18)F-FDG PET may complement the results of BMB and its performance may vary according to the type of lymphoma.     

Noninvasive assessment of Crohn's disease intestinal lesions with (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

Pilot studies have shown good sensitivity and specificity for (18)F-FDG PET in detecting gastrointestinal lesions of Crohn's disease. The combination of (18)F-FDG PET with CT may further improve the localization and characterization of lesions with increased (18)F-FDG uptake. Our aim was to assess the use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the activity and location of Crohn's disease along the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS: After giving informed consent, 22 patients with Crohn's disease were prospectively studied. They underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT, followed by ileocolonoscopy within 1 wk (mean, 2 d). The Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) was calculated, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin were measured before endoscopy. The Crohn's disease endoscopy index of severity (CDEIS) was calculated during endoscopy. The global CDEIS score and endoscopic subscores for various ileocolonic segments were used for analysis. RESULTS: Globally, 95 intestinal and colonic segments in 22 patients were analyzed. (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected 35 of 48 endoscopically affected segments (sensitivity for the detection of endoscopic lesions, 72.9%). The sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of severe endoscopic lesions (deep ulcers and strictures) was 100% (14/14). The global PET/CT score significantly correlated with CDEIS (r = 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.77; P = 0.017), CDAI (r = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.17-0.80; P = 0.005), and CRP (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.19-0.81; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT was globally well correlated to the clinical, endoscopic, and biologic activity of Crohn's disease. Above all, this technique had a good sensitivity for the detection of intestinal and colonic segments with moderate to severe mucosal lesions. The potential impact of this promising tool on the global management of patients with Crohn's disease should be further evaluated in prospective studies.     

18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis and grading of soft-tissue sarcoma: a meta-analysis.

PET using (18)F-FDG is increasingly used for the diagnosis and grading of tumors. Several studies have been performed that evaluate the diagnostic and grading performance of (18)F-FDG PET for soft-tissue sarcoma, but each study has had a limited sample size. Therefore, we undertook a comprehensive meta-analysis of the evidence. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified from MEDLINE and EMBASE. Diagnostic and grading performance were evaluated for qualitative visualization; standard uptake value (SUV, cutoffs of 2.0 and 3.0); and metabolic rate of glucose (MRG, cutoff of 6.0 micro mol/100 g/min). Quantitative data synthesis included independent weighting of sensitivity and specificity, construction of summary receiver operating characteristic curves, and pooled analyses. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies with 441 soft-tissue lesions (227 malignant, 214 benign). For diagnosis of malignant versus benign lesions, typical pairs of sensitivity and specificity estimates from the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were 92% and 73% for qualitative visualization; 87% and 79% for SUV 2.0; 70% and 87% for SUV 3.0; and 74% and 73% for MRG 6.0. Diagnostic performance was similar for primary and recurrent lesions. By qualitative interpretation, (18)F-FDG was positive in all intermediate/high-grade tumors (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.3%-100%), 74.4% (95% CI, 58.6%-85.9%) of low-grade tumors, and 39.3% (95% CI, 29.1%-50.3%) of benign lesions (including 11 of 12 inflammatory lesions). Using an SUV cutoff of 2.0, respective rates were 89.4% (95% CI, 79.4%-95.6%), 33.1% (95% CI, 15.6%-55.3%), and 19.1% (95% CI, 10.6%-30.5%). Limited data on comparisons with MRI and CT showed no differences against (18)F-FDG PET in diagnosing recurrent and metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET has very good discriminating ability in the evaluation of both primary and recurrent soft-tissue lesions. (18)F-FDG PET may be helpful in tumor grading but offers inadequate discrimination between low-grade tumors and benign lesions.     

18F-FET PET compared with 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with head and neck cancer.

Recent studies suggest a somewhat selective uptake of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in cerebral gliomas and in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and a good distinction between tumor and inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of 18F-FET PET in patients with SCC of the head and neck region by comparing that tracer with 18F-FDG PET and CT. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with suspected head and neck tumors underwent 18F-FET PET, 18F-FDG PET, and CT within 1 wk before operation. After coregistration, the images were evaluated by 3 independent observers and an ROC analysis was performed, with the histopathologic result used as a reference. Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) in the lesions were determined. RESULTS: In 18 of 21 patients, histologic examination revealed SCC, and in 2 of these patients, a second SCC tumor was found at a different anatomic site. In 3 of 21 patients, inflammatory tissue and no tumor were identified. Eighteen of 20 SCC tumors were positive for both 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FET uptake, one 0.3-cm SCC tumor was detected neither with 18F-FDG PET nor with 18F-FET PET, and one 0.7-cm SCC tumor in a 4.3-cm ulcer was overestimated as a 4-cm tumor on 18F-FDG PET and missed on 18F-FET PET. Inflammatory tissue was positive for 18F-FDG uptake (SUV, 3.7-4.7) but negative for 18F-FET uptake (SUV, 1.3-1.6). The SUVs of 18F-FDG in SCC were significantly higher (13.0 +/- 9.3) than those of 18F-FET (4.4 +/- 2.2). The ROC analysis showed significantly superior detection of SCC with (18)F-FET PET or 18F-FDG PET than with CT. No significant difference (P = 0.71) was found between 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FET PET. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET was 93%, specificity was 79%, and accuracy was 83%. 18F-FET PET yielded a lower sensitivity of 75% but a substantially higher specificity of 95% (accuracy, 90%). CONCLUSION: 18F-FET may not replace 18F-FDG in the PET diagnostics of head and neck cancer but may be a helpful additional tool in selected patients, because 18F-FET PET might better differentiate tumor tissue from inflammatory tissue. The sensitivity of 18F-FET PET in SCC, however, was inferior to that of 18F-FDG PET because of lower SUVs.     

Usefulness of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected metastatic brain tumors.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET imaging in the differentiation of metastatic brain tumor from primary brain tumor and in the localization of the primary lesion in patients with metastatic brain tumor. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 127 patients (77 men, 50 women; mean age +/- SD, 55 +/- 12 y) with brain masses that were suspected to be metastatic brain tumors on radiologic studies: 77 with confirmed metastatic brain tumor and 50 with primary brain tumor. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET was performed on all patients. When the abnormal lesion was detected outside the brain, we interpreted the brain lesion as metastatic brain tumor. RESULTS: In 61 of the 77 patients with metastatic brain tumor, primary lesions were detected using whole-body (18)F-FDG PET. Of the remaining 16 patients (all false-negative cases), 7 were classified as metastases of unknown origin. In 47 of the 50 patients with primary brain tumor, whole-body (18)F-FDG PET did not show any other abnormal lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of PET for the detection of primary origin were 79.2%, 94.0%, 95.3%, 74.6%, and 85.0%, respectively. The most common primary origin of metastatic brain tumors on PET examination was lung cancer (48/61, 78.7%). The concordance rate between (18)F-FDG PET and conventional radiologic work-up was 80% in identifying primary lesion. Unknown bone or bone marrow metastases and unsuspected distant metastases were found in 14 patients (18%) and 24 patients (31%), respectively, on PET examination. CONCLUSION: Screening the patients with suspected metastatic brain tumors using whole-body (18)F-FDG PET could be helpful in differentiating metastatic brain tumor from primary brain tumor and in detecting the primary lesion.     

Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate recurrent gastric cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) for detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection through a systematic review and meta-analysis. “PubMed”, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Springer, from the beginning of 2002 to Feb 2015, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET in detecting recurrent gastric cancer. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios and likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Fourteen studies (828 patients) were included. On a per-patient basis, the forest plots showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT were 0.85 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75–0.92], 0.78 (95 % CI 0.72–0.84), 3.9 (95 % CI 2.9–5.4), 0.19 (95 % CI 0.11–0.34), and 21 (95 % CI 9–47), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.61–0.86). The area under the SROC curve of PET/CT on the basis of per-patient was 0.86. ¹⁸F-FDG PET had great value in the detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection. The sensitivities of ¹⁸F-FDG PET were 85 and 75 %, respectively, on per-patient basis and on per-lesion basis.     

18F-FDG PET/CT在黑色素瘤中的应用价值

目的 探讨18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT显像在黑色素瘤诊断、临床分期及监测治疗后肿瘤复发与转移灶中的应用价值.方法 黑色素瘤患者61例,均进行18F-FDG PET/CT全身显像.所有PET、CT及PET/CT融合图像均通过融合软件进行帧对帧对比分析.肿瘤病灶根据病理学检查、多种影像学检查及临床随访结果诊断.结果 18F-FDG PET/CT显像对黑色素瘤病灶检出的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为90.9%(40/44)、88.2%(15/17)和90.2%(55/61).其中12例治疗前患者中,18F-FDG PET/CT显像诊断的灵敏度为83.3%(10/12).在黑色素瘤病灶局部切除、尚未进行其他治疗的9例患者中,5例残余病灶18F-FDG PET/CT显像检出3例;4例远处转移灶患者全被检出,提高了临床分期,改变了治疗方案.首先发现转移性黑色素瘤病灶并且手术切除后,寻找原发灶的7例患者中,18F-FDG PET/CT检出原发灶2例,4例其他转移灶全被检出.黑色素瘤患者根治术后监测肿瘤复发或转移患者33例,18F-FDG PET/CT显像灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为100.0%(19/19)、85.7%(12/14)和93.9%(31/33).与同期临床其他影像学检查比较,18F-FDG PET/CT显像发现更多,33例患者中,16例(48.5%)病灶提高临床分期;7例(21.2%)排除可疑病灶,降低临床分期;10例(30.3%)检出病灶与临床一致.结论 18F-FDG PET/CT显像对于黑色素瘤的诊断,残余病灶、复发病灶及转移灶的检出,临床分期的明确具有重要价值.     

Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with questionable MRI findings for recurrence.

It has been reported that 18F-FDG PET is highly sensitive for the detection of recurrent head-and-neck cancer. The objective of our prospective study was to validate the ability of this technique to detect the presence of tumors in primary, nodal, and distant sites as well as to assess its overall clinical usefulness in patients with questionable MRI findings for residual or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: From January 2002 to October 2003, a group of 37 NPC patients whose postradiation follow-up MRI examination showed questionable residual or recurrent disease was assessed with 18F-FDG PET. 18F-FDG PET was interpreted visually. Disease at primary, nodal, and distant sites was assessed. The final diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically or with clinical and imaging follow-up of at least 6 mo. RESULTS: Our results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent NPC were 91.6% and 76.0%, respectively, at the primary site; 90.0% and 88.9%, respectively, at nodal sites; and 100% and 90.6%, respectively, at distant sites. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 89.5% and 55.6%, respectively. Among the 37 patients, 18F-FDG PET added significant information to the MRI findings in 18, including offering true-negative findings in 10, revealing unexpected small metastatic adenopathy in 3, and disclosing distant metastatic foci in 5. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET is highly sensitive and moderately specific for the detection of recurrent NPC in patients with questionable MRI findings. Overall, 18F-FDG PET appears to add significant information to MRI findings in about half of the NPC patients whose MRI examination shows questionable tumor recurrence.     

Differential roles of 18F-FDG PET in patients with locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma after primary curative therapy: response evaluation and impact on management.

This prospective study compares the efficacies of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and a conventional work-up (CWU) in evaluating the treatment response for patients with locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after primary curative therapy and investigates the impact of PET on patient management. METHODS: Patients who had locoregional advanced NPC (stages III and IVa-b, staged by (18)F-FDG PET and CWU) and who had completed primary curative therapy for 3 mo were enrolled. The curative therapy consisted of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy. All of the patients also underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CWU to evaluate the response. The criteria for final diagnosis were based on pathology or subsequent follow-up for at least 6 mo. Rates of detection by (18)F-FDG PET and CWU and the impact on management were determined on site and patient bases, respectively. RESULTS: From January 2002 to August 2005, 131 patients with NPC were eligible, including 71 patients with stage III NPC (group A) and 60 patients with stage IVa-b NPC (group B). Twelve patients were proven to have residual tumors. (18)F-FDG PET had a higher overall sensitivity than CWU in group A (100% vs. 25%) and group B (91.7% vs. 58.3%). The overall specificity of PET was significantly higher than that of CWU in group B (97.6% vs. 91.7%; P = 0.019) but was slightly lower in group A (95.7% vs. 96.7%). The overall accuracy of PET also was significantly higher than that of CWU in group B (97.2% vs. 89.4%; P = 0.002) but was similar to that of CWU in group A (95.8% vs. 95.3%). PET resulted in management changes in 11 patients (15.4%; 11/71) in group A, with positive and negative impacts on 3 and 8 patients, respectively. In group B, the management of 26 of 60 patients (43%) was changed as a result of PET and included positive impacts on 23 patients and negative impacts on 3 patients. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET plays differential roles in patients with stage III NPC and stage IVa-b NPC after primary curative therapy. PET has higher sensitivity and specificity in evaluating the response and results in better management of patients with stage IVa-b NPC. PET has a less prominent impact on patient management but higher sensitivity in patients with stage III NPC.     

18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的系统评价

目的 系统评价18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT显像在脑肿瘤诊断中的临床价值.方法 采用Meta分析与直接比较方法.使用计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library,从建库至2016年10月,搜索直接比较18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的诊断性试验.用Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行分析,计算两种不同显像剂的合并敏感度(sensitivity,SEN)、合并特异度(specificity,SPE)、合并阳性似然比(positive likelihood ratio,+LR)、合并阴性似然比(negative likelihood ratio,-LR)、诊断优势比(diagnostic odds ratio,DOR),并绘制综合受试者工作特征曲线计算曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)与Q*值.结果 最终共纳入4篇文章,Meta 分析结果显示,18F-FDOPA PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.97(95％ CI =0.90 ～ 1.00),SPE为0.67(95％ CI =0.45 ～0.84),+LR为2.31 (95％ CI=1.40 ～3.81),-LR为0.07 (95％ CI =0.02～ 0.24),DOR为39.72(95％ CI=8.94～176.48),AUC为0.9725,Q*为0.9239.18F-FDG PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.51(95％CI=0.39～0.63),SPE为0.75(95％ CI=0.53 ～0.90,+LR为l.59(95％ CI=0.70 ～ 3.61),-LR为0.63(95％ CI =0.47 ～0.86),DOR为2.55(95％ CI =0.82 ～7.92),AUC为0.5848,Q*为0.5638.结论 18F-FDOPA PET/CT显像诊断脑肿瘤的敏感性比18F-FDG高,对脑肿瘤具有良好的诊断价值,可作为脑肿瘤诊断的方法之一.     

Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.

This study was performed to compare (18)F-FDG PET with CT for the evaluation of primary tumors and lymph node metastases in gastric cancer. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (28 women and 53 men; mean age, 56.6 y; age range; 32-82 y) who had undergone radical (n = 74) or palliative (n = 7) gastrectomy and lymph node dissection for the management of gastric cancer were included. Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET and CT were reviewed retrospectively for primary tumors of the stomach and lymph node metastases. Any increased (18)F-FDG uptake exceeding that of the adjacent normal gastric wall was considered positive for the primary tumor. Lymph nodes were classified into 3 groups based on their anatomic sites. Because perigastric lymph nodes (N1) were often not clearly differentiated from primary tumors, N1 lymph node metastases were determined when possible. Lymph nodes were considered positive or negative on the basis of the group as a whole. Final conclusions for primary tumors and lymph node metastases were based on histopathologic specimens in all patients. RESULTS: There were 17 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) and 64 patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). For primary tumors, both PET and CT showed a sensitivity of 47% (8/17) for EGC and 98% (63/64) for AGC. The sensitivity of CT for N1 disease was significantly higher than that of PET. (18)F-FDG PET had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 34% (11/32), 96% (47/49), and 72% (58/81), respectively, for N2 metastases, whereas the corresponding CT values were 44% (14/32), 86% (42/49), and 69% (56/81). For N3 metastases, PET and CT had the same sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 50% (3/6), 99% (74/75), and 95% (77/81), respectively. Overall, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET were not significantly different from those of CT for primary tumors or for N2 and N3 metastases. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET is as accurate as CT for the detection of primary tumors of either EGC or AGC. The low sensitivities of PET and CT were insufficient to allow decision making on the extent of lymphadenectomy. In contrast, the high specificity of PET for N disease appeared valuable, and the presence of N disease on PET may have a clinically significant impact on the choice of initial therapy.     

Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making.

The preoperative staging of colorectal cancer (CRC) with (18)F-FDG PET is not as yet generally considered to be evidence based. We have found only 1 study that evaluated (18)F-FDG PET in a nonselected population with proven CRC. Several other studies have concentrated on more advanced disease. The aim of this study was to assess the potential clinical benefit of (18)F-FDG PET in the routine staging of CRC. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients who had had CRC histologically proven by colonoscopy underwent prospective preoperative staging by plain chest radiography, sonography, CT, and (18)F-FDG PET. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were retrospectively assessed by comparison with the histologic results after surgery (36 patients) or clinical follow-up (2 inoperable cases-both patients died within 1 y of the PET examination). The impact of (18)F-FDG PET on therapeutic decision making was evaluated by comparing medical records before and after (18)F-FDG PET. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET correctly detected 95% of primary tumors, whereas CT and sonography correctly detected only 49% and 14%, respectively. Lymph nodes were involved in 7 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET were 29%, 88%, and 75%, respectively. CT and sonography did not reveal any lymph node involvement. Liver metastases were present in 9 patients. (18)F-FDG PET, CT, and sonography had a sensitivity of 78%, 67%, and 25%, respectively; a specificity of 96%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; and an accuracy of 91%, 91%, and 81%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET revealed further lesions in 11 patients. Levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 tumor markers were elevated in, respectively, only 33% and 8% of cases of proven CRC. (18)F-FDG PET changed the treatment modality for 8% and the range of surgery for 13% of patients. In total, (18)F-FDG PET changed the method of treatment for 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: Plain chest radiography and sonography did not bring any clinical benefits. No correlation was found between the level of tumor markers and the stage of disease. CT is necessary for confirmation of PET findings at extraabdominal sites (PET-guided CT) and for their morphologic specification at abdominal and pelvic sites before an operation. (18)F-FDG PET is the best method for the staging of CRC in all localities, despite the high rate of false-negative PET findings in patients with lymph node involvement. PET should be performed as a first examination after verification of CRC. We propose a PET/CT hybrid system as optimal in the staging of CRC.     

^18F-FDG PET／CT及增强CT诊断原发性肝癌及肝癌术后复发的价值

目的比较^18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET／CT与增强CT对原发性肝癌或肝癌术后复发的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析诊断为原发性肝癌或肝癌术后复发且进行^18F-FDG PET／CT与增强CT检查的病例共25例,2种检查间隔时间在1周内。其中原发性肝癌经手术或穿刺证实,肝癌术后复发经临床随访证实。结果25例患者中,确诊为原发性肝癌14例,其中肝细胞肝痛13例,胆管细胞癌1例;肝癌术后复发11例。^18F-FDG PET／CT对原发性肝癌的诊断阳性率为78．6％（11／14）,增强CT阳性率为92．9％（13／14）。在肝癌术后复发中,^18F-FDGPET／CT诊断阳性牢为100．0％（11／11）,增强CT阳性率为63．6％（7／11）。结论在原发性肝癌诊断中,增强CT优于^18F-FDG PET／CT,^18F-FDG PET／CT显像联合增强CT可明显提高诊断率。而在肝癌术后复发检测中,^18F-FDG PET／CT优于增强CT。     

18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer.

The value of PET or PET/CT with (18)F-FDG for the staging of penile cancer has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to investigate the pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake in the primary malignancy and its metastases and to determine the diagnostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the staging and restaging of penile cancer. METHODS: Thirteen patients (mean +/- SD age, 64 +/- 14.0 y) with suspected penile cancer or suspected recurrent disease were examined with a Gemini PET/CT system (200 MBq of (18)F-FDG). The reference standard was based on histopathologic findings obtained at biopsy or during surgery. RESULTS: Both the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases exhibited a pattern of (18)F-FDG uptake typical for malignancy. Sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions was 75% (6/8), and specificity was 75% (3/4). On a per-patient basis, sensitivity in the detection of lymph node metastases was 80% (4/5), and specificity was 100% (8/8). On a nodal-group basis, PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 89% (8/9) in the detection of metastases in the superficial inguinal lymph node basins and a sensitivity of 100% (7/7) in the deep inguinal and obturator lymph node basins. The mean +/- SD maximum standardized uptake value for the 8 primary lesions was 5.3 +/- 3.7, and that for the 16 lymph node metastases was 4.6 +/- 2.0. CONCLUSION: According to our results, the main indication for (18)F-FDG PET in the primary staging or follow-up of penile cancer patients may be the prognostically crucial search for lymph node metastases. With the use of a PET/CT unit, the additional information provided by CT may be especially useful for planning surgery. Implementing (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in future staging algorithms may lead to a more precise and stage-appropriate therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, invasive procedures with a high morbidity rate, such as general bilateral lymphadenectomy, may be avoided.     

18F-FDG PET/CT诊断多发癌的价值

目的 探讨18F-FDG PET/CT在多发癌诊断中的价值。 方法 回顾性分析5822例疑似肿瘤患者,均行18F-FDG PET/CT全身检查,经过活检或手术证实为多发癌患者32例。以病理结果作为金标准,以PET平均标准化摄取值（SUV_mean）≥2.5且CT上有形态学改变者作为PET/CT判断恶性肿瘤的标准,计算PET/CT诊断多发癌的灵敏度和准确率。 结果 本组患者中多发癌的发生率为0.55%,其中,双发癌30例、三发癌2例,共66个原发灶。32例多发癌的66个原发灶的SUV_mean的平均值为6.68±3.61。PET/CT诊断多发癌原发灶真阳性为58个,假阴性为8个。PET/CT诊断多发癌的灵敏度为87.9%,准确率为87.9%。 结论 18F-FDG PET/CT全身检查诊断多发癌具有较大价值。     

Clinical value of FDG PET or PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Aim

The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET or PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer.

Materials and methods

The authors conducted a systematic MEDLINE search of articles published between January 2000 and December 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study. We conducted a meta-analysis of pooled sensitivity and specificity in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of bladder cancer.

Results

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT for primary lesion detection of bladder cancer were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.70–0.99) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.74–1.00), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET or PET/CT for staging or restaging (metastatic lesions) of bladder cancer were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.72–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81–0.95), respectively.

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET or PET/CT is good in metastatic lesions of urinary bladder cancer. Due to the small number of patients and limited number of studies analyzed, the diagnostic capability of FDG PET or PET/CT in detection of primary bladder wall lesions could not be assessed.     

18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study assessed the diagnostic performances of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in detecting pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: Through a search of MEDLINE (January 1998 to March 2011), an overall weighted average for sensitivity and specificity as well as pooled estimates of positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated. A summary receiver-operating-characteristics (sROC) curve was constructed and the area under the sROC curve (AUC) was calculated. I-square was calculated to explore heterogeneity. RESULTS: The present study included 243 patients from seven studies. Results indicated a lack of significant heterogeneity for sensitivity and specificity (I(2)<50% and p>0.05). The overall pooled estimates for sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET or PET/CT scans in the detection of pelvic and/or paraaortic metastasis were 63.0% (95% CI, 48.7-75.7%) and 94.7% (95% CI, 90.4-97.4%), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 10.465 (95% CI, 5.646-19.396) and the negative likelihood ratio 0.399 (95% CI, 0.284-0.560). The AUC was 0.9533. The overall diagnostic accuracy (Q* index) was 89.5%. Conclusion The high positive likelihood value confirms the reliability of a positive FDG-PET or PET/CT to detect pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes metastasis in patients with untreated endometrial cancer. FDG-PET or PET/CT may prove beneficial to surgeons when selecting appropriate patients on whom to perform lymphadenectomy.     

应用全身18F-FDG PET/PET-CT为脑转移瘤患者寻找原发灶

目的 评价全身18F-FDG PET/PET-CT在脑转移瘤寻找原发灶中的诊断价值.方法 对67例以脑转移瘤查找原发灶为主诉的肿瘤患者的18F-FDG PET/PET-CT资料进行回顾性分析.结果 本组67例患者中57例患者的原发灶位置得到了确诊,原发灶的检出率为85.1%;其中原发性肺癌29例,占50.9%;所有肺癌中病理分型为低分化腺癌者共13/29例,占44.8%.除可检出原发灶外,18F-FDG PET/PET-CT全身显像还检出肺转移、淋巴结转移、骨转移、肝转移及其他少见部位的转移灶.与"F-FDG PET-CT相比,单纯的18F-FDG PET图像对肺转移病灶的检出率仅为10.9%.结论 18F-FDG PET/PET-CT的全身扫描有利于发现原发灶及其他转移灶.     

18F-FDG PET显像诊断原发性鼻咽癌的价值

目的　探讨18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG)PET显像对原发性鼻咽癌的诊断价值。方法　对 51例受检者行18F FDGPET显像 ,其中 3 1例行病理组织学检查 ,最后诊断根据病理组织学检查结果和临床随访。结果　18F FDGPET显像诊断原发性鼻咽癌的灵敏度为 96.0 0 % ,特异性为 76 92 % ,阳性预测值为 80 .0 0 % ,阴性预测值为 95 2 4% ,准确性为 86 2 7%。鼻咽癌、鼻咽炎症和无鼻咽病变组标准摄取值 (SUV)均值比较 ,3组间差异有显著性 (F =2 1 3 0 ,P <0 0 1)。结论　18F FDGPET显像诊断原发性鼻咽癌具有高灵敏度和高阴性预测值