Activities of Fosfomycin,Tigecycline, Colistin,and Gentamicin against Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Foreign-Body Infection Model

Limited antimicrobial agents are available for the treatment of implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. We compared the activities of fosfomycin, tigecycline, colistin, and gentamicin (alone and in combination) against a CTX-M15-producing strain of Escherichia coli (Bj HDE-1) in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase (MBC_log) and stationary phase (MBC_stat) were 0.12, 0.12, and 8 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 0.25, 32, and 32 μg/ml for tigecycline, 0.25, 0.5, and 2 μg/ml for colistin, and 2, 8, and 16 μg/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In time-kill studies, colistin showed concentration-dependent activity, but regrowth occurred after 24 h. Fosfomycin demonstrated rapid bactericidal activity at the MIC, and no regrowth occurred. Synergistic activity between fosfomycin and colistin in vitro was observed, with no detectable bacterial counts after 6 h. In animal studies, fosfomycin reduced planktonic counts by 4 log₁₀ CFU/ml, whereas in combination with colistin, tigecycline, or gentamicin, it reduced counts by >6 log₁₀ CFU/ml. Fosfomycin was the only single agent which was able to eradicate E. coli biofilms (cure rate, 17% of implanted, infected cages). In combination, colistin plus tigecycline (50%) and fosfomycin plus gentamicin (42%) cured significantly more infected cages than colistin plus gentamicin (33%) or fosfomycin plus tigecycline (25%) (P < 0.05). The combination of fosfomycin plus colistin showed the highest cure rate (67%), which was significantly better than that of fosfomycin alone (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the combination of fosfomycin plus colistin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.     

Activities of Fosfomycin and Rifampin on Planktonic and Adherent Enterococcus faecalis Strains in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

Enterococcal implant-associated infections are difficult to treat because antibiotics generally lack activity against enterococcal biofilms. We investigated fosfomycin, rifampin, and their combinations against planktonic and adherent Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 19433) in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC/MBC_log values were 32/>512 μg/ml for fosfomycin, 4/>64 μg/ml for rifampin, 1/2 μg/ml for ampicillin, 2/>256 μg/ml for linezolid, 16/32 μg/ml for gentamicin, 1/>64 μg/ml for vancomycin, and 1/5 μg/ml for daptomycin. In time-kill studies, fosfomycin was bactericidal at 8× and 16× MIC, but regrowth of resistant strains occurred after 24 h. With the exception of gentamicin, no complete inhibition of growth-related heat production was observed with other antimicrobials on early (3 h) or mature (24 h) biofilms. In the animal model, fosfomycin alone or in combination with daptomycin reduced planktonic counts by ≈4 log₁₀ CFU/ml below the levels before treatment. Fosfomycin cleared planktonic bacteria from 74% of cage fluids (i.e., no growth in aspirated fluid) and eradicated biofilm bacteria from 43% of cages (i.e., no growth from removed cages). In combination with gentamicin, fosfomycin cleared 77% and cured 58% of cages; in combination with vancomycin, fosfomycin cleared 33% and cured 18% of cages; in combination with daptomycin, fosfomycin cleared 75% and cured 17% of cages. Rifampin showed no activity on planktonic or adherent E. faecalis, whereas in combination with daptomycin it cured 17% and with fosfomycin it cured 25% of cages. Emergence of fosfomycin resistance was not observed in vivo. In conclusion, fosfomycin showed activity against planktonic and adherent E. faecalis. Its role against enterococcal biofilms should be further investigated, especially in combination with rifampin and/or daptomycin treatment.     

Efficacy of Daptomycin in Implant-Associated Infection Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Importance of Combination with Rifampin

Limited treatment options are available for implant-associated infections caused by methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We compared the activity of daptomycin (alone and with rifampin [rifampicin]) with the activities of other antimicrobial regimens against MRSA ATCC 43300 in the guinea pig foreign-body infection model. The daptomycin MIC and the minimum bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase and stationary growth phase of MRSA were 0.625, 0.625, and 20 μg/ml, respectively. In time-kill studies, daptomycin showed rapid and concentration-dependent killing of MRSA in stationary growth phase. At concentrations above 20 μg/ml, daptomycin reduced the counts by >3 log₁₀ CFU/ml in 2 to 4 h. In sterile cage fluid, daptomycin peak concentrations of 23.1, 46.3, and 53.7 μg/ml were reached 4 to 6 h after the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. In treatment studies, daptomycin alone reduced the planktonic MRSA counts by 0.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml, whereas in combination with rifampin, a reduction in the counts of >6 log₁₀ CFU/ml was observed. Vancomycin and daptomycin (at both doses) were unable to cure any cage-associated infection when they were given as monotherapy, whereas rifampin alone cured the infections in 33% of the cages. In combination with rifampin, daptomycin showed cure rates of 25% (at 20 mg/kg) and 67% (at 30 mg/kg), vancomycin showed a cure rate of 8%, linezolid showed a cure rate of 0%, and levofloxacin showed a cure rate of 58%. In addition, daptomycin at a high dose (30 mg/kg) completely prevented the emergence of rifampin resistance in planktonic and adherent MRSA cells. Daptomycin at a high dose, corresponding to 6 mg/kg in humans, in combination with rifampin showed the highest activity against planktonic and adherent MRSA. Daptomycin plus rifampin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated MRSA infections.Implants are increasingly used in modern medicine to replace a compromised biological function or missing anatomical structure. Periprosthetic infections represent a devastating complication, causing high rates of morbidity and consuming considerable health care resources. Implant-associated infections are caused by microorganisms growing adherent to the device surface and embedded in an extracellular polymeric matrix, a complex three-dimensional structure called a microbial biofilm (8). Bacterial communities in biofilms cause persistent infection due to increased resistance to antibiotics and the immune system and the difficulty with eradicating them from the implant (6).Staphylococcus aureus is one of the leading pathogens causing implant-associated infections. Successful treatment requires the use of bactericidal drugs acting on surface-adhering microorganisms, which predominantly exist in the stationary growth phase. Previous in vitro, experimental, and clinical studies demonstrated that rifampin (rifampicin)-containing antimicrobial regimens were able to eradicate staphylococcal biofilms and cure implant-associated infections (23, 25). Quinolones are often used in combination with rifampin in order to prevent the emergence of rifampin resistance (4, 19, 21). However, methicillin (meticillin)-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are often resistant to quinolones. In addition, MRSA strains were recently shown to have decreased susceptibility to vancomycin, reducing the efficacy of this drug. Therefore, alternative drugs for use in combination with rifampin against implant-associated infections are needed (12, 20).Daptomycin is a negatively charged cyclic lipopeptide with bactericidal activity against gram-positive organisms, including MRSA (17). The drug inserts into the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane in a calcium-dependent fashion, leading to rapid cell death without lysis, and causing only minimal inflammation (15). Daptomycin has been well tolerated in healthy volunteers dosed with up to 12 mg/kg of body weight intravenously for 14 days (2). Only limited data on the use of daptomycin in combination with rifampin against staphylococcal implant-associated infections are available.In this study, we investigated the activity of daptomycin against MRSA ATCC 43300 in vitro. In addition, we evaluated the activity of daptomycin in combination with rifampin in a cage-associated infection model in guinea pigs and compared the efficacy of the treatment with the efficacies of three other antibiotics commonly used against MRSA, vancomycin, linezolid, and levofloxacin (alone and in combination with rifampin).(Part of the results of the present study were presented at the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, DC, 24 to 29 October 2008 [abstr. B-1000].)     

Fosfomycin-Daptomycin and Other Fosfomycin Combinations as Alternative Therapies in Experimental Foreign-Body Infection by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

The efficacy of daptomycin, imipenem, or rifampin with fosfomycin was evaluated and compared with that of daptomycin-rifampin in a tissue cage model infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Strain HUSA 304 was used. The study yielded the following results for MICs (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 4; daptomycin, 1; imipenem, 0.25; and rifampin, 0.03. The study yielded the following results for minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 8; daptomycin, 4; imipenem, 32; and rifampin, 0.5. Daptomycin-rifampin was confirmed as the most effective therapy against MRSA foreign-body infections. Fosfomycin combinations with high doses of daptomycin and rifampin were efficacious alternative therapies in this setting. Fosfomycin-imipenem was relatively ineffective and did not protect against resistance.     

Fosfomycin Synergy In Vitro with Amoxicillin,Daptomycin, and Linezolid against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium from Renal Transplant Patients with Infected Urinary Stents

Fosfomycin is a potential option for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) infections despite limited in vitro and clinical data. In this study, 32 VRE isolates from renal transplant patients with urinary stent infections were susceptible to fosfomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid and resistant to amoxicillin, minocycline, and nitrofurantoin based on their MIC₅₀s and MIC₉₀s. Fosfomycin was bacteriostatic at 0.5 to 16× the MIC (32 to 2,048 μg/ml); synergy occurred when fosfomycin was combined with daptomycin (2.8 to 3.9 log₁₀ CFU/ml kill; P < 0.001) or amoxicillin (2.6 to 3.4; P < 0.05). These combinations may be potent options to treat VRE urinary infections pending investigation of clinical efficacy.     

A Novel Approach Utilizing Biofilm Time-Kill Curves To Assess the Bactericidal Activity of Ceftaroline Combinations against Biofilm-Producing Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Medical device infections frequently require combination therapy. Beta-lactams combined with glycopeptides/lipopeptides are bactericidal against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Novel macrowell kill-curve methods tested synergy between ceftaroline or cefazolin plus daptomycin, vancomycin, or rifampin against biofilm-producing MRSA. Ceftaroline combinations demonstrated the most pronounced bacterial reductions. Ceftaroline demonstrated greatest kill with daptomycin (4.02 ± 0.59 log₁₀ CFU/cm²), compared to combination with vancomycin (3.36 ± 0.35 log₁₀ CFU/cm²) or rifampin (2.68 ± 0.61 log₁₀ CFU/cm²). These data suggest that beta-lactam combinations are useful against MRSA biofilms.     

Evaluation of Double- and Triple-Antibiotic Combinations for VIM- and NDM-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae by In Vitro Time-Kill Experiments

Combination therapy is recommended for infections with carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, limited data exist on which antibiotic combinations are the most effective. The aim of this study was to find effective antibiotic combinations against metallo-beta-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae (MBL-KP). Two VIM- and two NDM-producing K. pneumoniae strains, all susceptible to colistin, were exposed to antibiotics at clinically relevant static concentrations during 24-h time-kill experiments. Double- and triple-antibiotic combinations of aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, colistin, daptomycin, fosfomycin, meropenem, rifampin, telavancin, tigecycline, and vancomycin were used. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log₁₀ decrease in CFU/ml between the combination and its most active drug after 24 h, and bactericidal effect was defined as a ≥3 log₁₀ decrease in CFU/ml after 24 h compared with the starting inoculum. Synergistic or bactericidal activity was demonstrated for aztreonam, fosfomycin, meropenem, and rifampin in double-antibiotic combinations with colistin and also for aztreonam, fosfomycin, and rifampin in triple-antibiotic combinations with meropenem and colistin. Overall, the combination of rifampin-meropenem-colistin was the most effective regimen, demonstrating synergistic and bactericidal effects against all four strains. Meropenem-colistin, meropenem-fosfomycin, and tigecycline-colistin combinations were not bactericidal against the strains used. The findings of this and other studies indicate that there is great potential of antibiotic combinations against carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. However, our results deviate to some extent from those of previous studies, which might be because most studies to date have included KPC-producing rather than MBL-producing strains. More studies addressing MBL-KP are needed.     

In Vitro Efficacies and Resistance Profiles of Rifampin-Based Combination Regimens for Biofilm-Embedded Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

To compare the in vitro antibacterial efficacies and resistance profiles of rifampin-based combinations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a biofilm model, the antibacterial activities of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, minocycline, linezolid, fusidic acid, fosfomycin, and tigecycline alone or in combination with rifampin against biofilm-embedded MRSA were measured. The rifampin-resistant mutation frequencies were evaluated. Of the rifampin-based combinations, rifampin enhances the antibacterial activities of and even synergizes with fusidic acid, tigecycline, and, to a lesser extent, linezolid, fosfomycin, and minocycline against biofilm-embedded MRSA. Such combinations with weaker rifampin resistance induction activities may provide a therapeutic advantage in MRSA biofilm-related infections.     

Daptomycin plus Fosfomycin,a Synergistic Combination in Experimental Implant-Associated Osteomyelitis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Rats

The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin in experimental chronic implant-associated osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infection was induced in the tibiae of rats by the insertion of a bacterial inoculum (1 to 5 × 10⁸ CFU/ml) of a clinical MRSA isolate and a titanium wire. Four weeks after infection, each animal was assigned to a treatment group: daptomycin monotherapy at 60 mg/kg of body weight once daily (n = 10), fosfomycin monotherapy at 40 mg/kg once daily (n = 10), or daptomycin and fosfomycin combined at 60 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, respectively, once daily (n = 9). Ten animals were left untreated. After a 3-week treatment period, the animals were euthanized, and the infected tibiae and implants were processed for quantitative bacterial cultures. The bacterial cultures from bones were positive for MRSA in all animals in the untreated group, the daptomycin group, and the fosfomycin group, with median bacterial counts of 2.34 × 10⁶ CFU/g bone, 1.57 × 10⁶ CFU/g bone, and 3.48 × 10² CFU/g bone, respectively. In the daptomycin-fosfomycin group, 6 out of 9 animals were positive for MRSA, with a median count of 7.92 CFU/g bone. Bacterial cultures derived from the titanium wires were negative in the fosfomycin- and daptomycin-fosfomycin-treated groups. Based on bacterial counts in bones, treatment with daptomycin-fosfomycin was statistically significantly superior to all that of the other groups (P ≤ 0.003). Fosfomycin was superior to daptomycin and no treatment (P < 0.0001). No development of resistance was observed in any treatment arm. The combination of daptomycin and fosfomycin demonstrated synergism against MRSA in experimental implant-associated osteomyelitis.     

Evaluation of the Novel Combination of High-Dose Daptomycin plus Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole against Daptomycin-Nonsusceptible Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model of Simulated Endocardial Vegetations

Daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) Staphylococcus aureus is found in difficult-to-treat infections, and the optimal therapy is unknown. We investigated the activity of high-dose (HD) daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole de-escalated to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against 4 clinical DNS methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of simulated endocardial vegetations (10⁹ CFU/g). Simulated regimens included HD daptomycin at 10 mg/kg/day for 14 days, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 160/800 mg every 12 h for 14 days, HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 14 days, and the combination for 7 days de-escalated to HD daptomycin for 7 days and de-escalated to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 7 days. Differences in CFU/g (at 168 and 336 h) were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Tukey''s post hoc test. Daptomycin MICs were 4 μg/ml (SA H9749-1, vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus; R6212, heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus) and 2 μg/ml (R5599 and R5563). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole MICs were ≤0.06/1.19 μg/ml. HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole displayed rapid bactericidal activity against SA H9749-1 (at 7 h) and R6212 (at 6 h) and bactericidal activity against R5599 (at 72 h) and R5563 (at 36 h). A ≥8 log₁₀ CFU/g decrease was observed with HD daptomycin plus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against all strains (at 48 to 144 h), which was maintained with de-escalation to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 336 h. The combination for 14 days and the combination for 7 days de-escalated to HD daptomycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was significantly better than daptomycin monotherapy (P < 0.05) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy (P < 0.05) at 168 and 336 h. Combination therapy followed by de-escalation offers a novel bactericidal therapeutic alternative for high-inoculum, serious DNS MRSA infections.     

Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline Tested against Staphylococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Linezolid,Daptomycin, or Vancomycin from U.S. Hospitals, 2008 to 2011

Vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin are very active against staphylococci, but isolates with decreased susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents are isolated sporadically. A total of 19,350 Staphylococcus aureus isolates (51% methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and 3,270 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were collected consecutively from 82 U.S. medical centers from January 2008 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility against ceftaroline and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. Among S. aureus strains, 14 isolates (0.07%) exhibited decreased susceptibility to linezolid (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), 18 (0.09%) to daptomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml), and 369 (1.9%) to vancomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml; 368 isolates at 2 μg/ml and 1 at 4 μg/ml). Fifty-one (1.6%) CoNS were linezolid resistant (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), and four (0.12%) were daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml). Ceftaroline was very active against S. aureus overall (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.5% susceptible), including MRSA (MIC_50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 97.2% susceptible). All daptomycin-nonsusceptible and 85.7% of linezolid-resistant S. aureus isolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. Against S. aureus isolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥2 μg/ml, 91.9, 96.2, and 98.9% were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, and linezolid, respectively. CoNS strains were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml; 99.1% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), including methicillin-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml), linezolid-resistant (MIC_50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (4 isolates; MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin, and it may represent a valuable treatment option for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant staphylococci.     

Role of rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model

Propionibacterium acnes is an important cause of orthopedic-implant-associated infections, for which the optimal treatment has not yet been determined. We investigated the activity of rifampin, alone and in combination, against planktonic and biofilm P. acnes in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. The MIC and the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) were 0.007 and 4 μg/ml for rifampin, 1 and 4 μg/ml for daptomycin, 1 and 8 μg/ml for vancomycin, 1 and 2 μg/ml for levofloxacin, 0.03 and 16 μg/ml for penicillin G, 0.125 and 512 μg/ml for clindamycin, and 0.25 and 32 μg/ml for ceftriaxone. The P. acnes minimal biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) was 16 μg/ml for rifampin; 32 μg/ml for penicillin G; 64 μg/ml for daptomycin and ceftriaxone; and ≥128 μg/ml for levofloxacin, vancomycin, and clindamycin. In the animal model, implants were infected by injection of 10⁹ CFU P. acnes in cages. Antimicrobial activity on P. acnes was investigated in the cage fluid (planktonic form) and on explanted cages (biofilm form). The cure rates were 4% for daptomycin, 17% for vancomycin, 0% for levofloxacin, and 36% for rifampin. Rifampin cured 63% of the infected cages in combination with daptomycin, 46% with vancomycin, and 25% with levofloxacin. While all tested antimicrobials showed good activity against planktonic P. acnes, for eradication of biofilms, rifampin was needed. In combination with rifampin, daptomycin showed higher cure rates than with vancomycin in this foreign-body infection model.     

Telavancin In Vitro Activity against a Collection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates,Including Resistant Subsets,from the United States

Telavancin had MIC₅₀, MIC₉₀, and MIC₁₀₀ values of 0.03, 0.06, and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively, against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and non-multidrug-resistant (non-MDR) and MDR subsets. MRSA with elevated MIC values for vancomycin (2 to 4 μg/ml) or daptomycin (1 to 2 μg/ml) had telavancin MIC₅₀ (0.06 μg/ml) values 2-fold higher than those of isolates with lower MIC results (MIC₅₀, 0.03 μg/ml). However, telavancin had MIC₉₀ and MIC₁₀₀ results of 0.06 and 0.12 μg/ml (100% susceptible), respectively, regardless of the MRSA subset.     

Telavancin Demonstrates Activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Reduced Susceptibility to Vancomycin,Daptomycin, and Linezolid in Broth Microdilution MIC and One-Compartment Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Models

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates have arisen with reduced susceptibility to several anti-MRSA agents. Telavancin (TLV), a novel anti-MRSA agent, retains low MICs against these organisms. Our objective was to determine the MICs for TLV, daptomycin (DAP), vancomycin (VAN), and linezolid (LZD) against daptomycin-nonsusceptible (DNS) S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), heteroresistant VISA (hVISA), and linezolid-resistant (LZD^r) S. aureus. We also evaluated these agents against each phenotype in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models. Seventy DNS, 100 VISA, 180 hVISA, and 25 LZD^r MRSA isolates were randomly selected from our library and tested to determine their MICs against TLV, DAP, VAN, and LZD via broth microdilution and a Trek panel. Four isolates were randomly selected for 168-h in vitro models to evaluate treatment with TLV at 10 mg/kg of body weight/day, DAP at 10 mg/kg/day, VAN at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), and LZD at 600 mg q12h. The MIC_50/90 for TLV, DAP, VAN, and LZD against 70 DNS S. aureus isolates were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 2/4 μg/ml, 1/2 μg/ml, and 2/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 100 VISA isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 1/1 μg/ml, 4/8 μg/ml, and 1/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 170 hVISA isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.06/0.125 μg/ml, 0.5/1 μg/ml, 1/2 μg/ml, and 1/2 μg/ml, respectively. Against 25 LZD^r isolates, the MIC_50/90 were 0.03/0.06 μg/ml, 1/1 μg/ml, 2/2 μg/ml, and 8/8 μg/ml, respectively. The TLV MIC was >0.125 μg/ml for 10/365 (2.7%) isolates. In PK/PD models, TLV was universally bactericidal at 168 h and statistically superior to all antibiotics against DNS S. aureus strain R2334. These data further establish the potency of TLV against resistant MRSA. The model data demonstrate in vitro bactericidal activity of TLV against hVISA, VISA, DNS S. aureus, and LZD^r S. aureus strains. Further clinical research is warranted.     

In Vitro Activity of Retapamulin against Staphylococcus aureus Resistant to Various Antimicrobial Agents

Retapamulin and six other antimicrobial agents were evaluated against 155 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates, including strains resistant to vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, and mupirocin by microdilution tests. Time-kill assays were performed against representative MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA), and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) isolates. Retapamulin and mupirocin demonstrated MIC₉₀s of 0.12 μg/ml and 8 μg/ml, respectively, with resistance seen in 2.6% and 10% of isolates, respectively. Retapamulin maintained good activity against 94% (15/16) of mupirocin-resistant isolates.     

Addition of Gentamicin or Rifampin Does Not Enhance the Effectiveness of Daptomycin in Treatment of Experimental Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

This study evaluated the activity of daptomycin combined with either gentamicin or rifampin against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates in vitro and one isolate in vivo against a representative strain (MRSA-572). Time-kill experiments showed that daptomycin was bactericidal against these strains at concentrations over the MIC. Daptomycin at sub-MIC concentrations plus gentamicin at 1× and 2× the MIC yielded synergy, while the addition of rifampin at 2 to 4 μg/ml resulted in indifference (two strains) or antagonism (one strain). The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight once a day) was evaluated ± gentamicin (1 mg/kg intravenously [i.v.] every 8 h [q8h]) or rifampin (300 mg i.v. q8h) in a rabbit model of infective endocarditis by simulating human pharmacokinetics. Daptomycin plus gentamicin (median, 0 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] log₁₀ CFU/g vegetation) was as effective as daptomycin alone (0 [0 to 2] log₁₀ CFU/g vegetation) in reducing the density of bacteria in valve vegetations (P = 0.83), and both were more effective than daptomycin plus rifampin (3 [2 to 3.5] log₁₀ CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.05) for the strain studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized a ratio of vegetations that was similar to that of daptomycin plus gentamicin (10/15 [67%] versus 9/15 [60%]; P = 0.7), and both regimens did so more than daptomycin plus rifampin (3/15 [20%]; P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). No statistical difference was noted between daptomycin plus gentamicin and daptomycin alone for MRSA treatment. In the combination arm, all isolates from vegetations remained susceptible to daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampin. Sixty-one percent of the isolates (8/13) acquired resistance to rifampin during monotherapy. In the daptomycin arm, resistance was detected in only one case, in which the daptomycin MIC rose to 2 μg/ml among the recovered bacteria. In conclusion, the addition of gentamicin or rifampin does not enhance the effectiveness of daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to MRSA.Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of infective endocarditis (IE), with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains found in up to one-third of all cases (11, 28). Due to multidrug resistance among many strains, vancomycin is the standard therapy for IE caused by MRSA (1). However, vancomycin therapy has been associated with poor outcomes that may be explained by the drug''s slow bactericidal activity and insufficient diffusion into valve vegetations (5, 10, 23).Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide that is rapidly bactericidal against gram-positive pathogens such as MRSA, including strains that exhibit resistance to vancomycin. It is approved for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections, S. aureus bacteremia, and right-sided native valve endocarditis (6). However, there is limited information regarding the efficacy of daptomycin in the treatment of left-sided native valve IE caused by MRSA. In a randomized clinical trial (10), none of the patients with left-sided endocarditis treated with daptomycin at 6 mg/kg of body weight/day were cured, and postmarketing registry data (24) revealed a successful clinical outcome in only 9 out of 15 cases (60%). Therefore, given the lack of efficacy data with daptomycin monotherapy in left-sided MRSA endocarditis, the continued evaluation of methods to enhance the activity of daptomycin is warranted. It is unknown whether daptomycin''s activity against MRSA may be improved by combining it with one or more additional antibiotics to produce a potentially additive or synergistic effect. Gentamicin has been shown to augment daptomycin''s activity against strains of MRSA in vitro (4, 20, 35). The combination of daptomycin plus rifampin has demonstrated additive activity against MRSA in vitro (4) and has enhanced activity against MRSA in vivo (4, 32). The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of daptomycin combined with gentamicin or rifampin against MRSA and compare treatment with daptomycin alone to treatment with both combinations in experimental MRSA aortic valve endocarditis using a human-adapted pharmacokinetic model.(This work was previously presented at the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy [ICAAC], Chicago, IL, 17 to 20 September 2007 [29a] and at the 48th Annual ICAAC-IDSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 25 to 28 October 2008 [29b].)     

Nine-Hospital Study Comparing Broth Microdilution and Etest Method Results for Vancomycin and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results for 1,800 randomly selected oxacillin (methicillin [meticillin])-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream isolates from nine U.S. hospitals (collected from 2002 to 2006) were determined by a reference broth microdilution (BMD) method using frozen-form panels with precise incremental dilutions and by the Etest technique. The Etest provided vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results that were consistently higher (0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilution steps) than those provided by the reference BMD method. The dominant MRSA population (91.2% of MRSA isolates) would be categorized as vancomycin nonsusceptible by the MIC results from the Etest method if the susceptibility breakpoint was adjusted downward to ≤1 μg/ml, as suggested by clinical outcome studies.Vancomycin is still used extensively for the treatment of oxacillin (methicillin [meticillin])-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, as well as other less serious MRSA infections. However, vancomycin treatment failure is not uncommon, even when the MRSA strains are fully susceptible to vancomycin according to the criterion (breakpoint MIC, ≤2 μg/ml) used by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). A reduction in the efficacy of vancomycin against MRSA strains for which vancomycin MICs are elevated (to 1 to 2 μg/ml) has been widely reported, suggesting that modest elevations in MICs may explain some suboptimal clinical outcomes (10, 13).The vast majority of clinical laboratories use automated systems and a distinct minority use the disk diffusion method as the routine susceptibility testing technique. However, the disk diffusion method and some automated systems do not accurately detect vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (7). In addition, there have been a growing number of reports showing discrepancies between in vitro susceptibility test results for vancomycin and clinical outcomes of MRSA infections treated with this glycopeptide (6, 11). Thus, many laboratories are being requested to assess exact MICs by reference or alternative methods, such as that of Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).Although daptomycin remains very active against S. aureus, an association between reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and reduced susceptibility to daptomycin has been reported by some investigators (1). S. aureus isolates classified as daptomycin nonsusceptible according to MICs (≥2 μg/ml) are still rare, and no definitive resistance mechanism has been identified. However, genetic mutations and increases in daptomycin MICs after prolonged vancomycin and/or daptomycin treatment of infections associated with septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, septic thrombophlebitis, and endocarditis, especially in the presence of intravenous catheters and other prosthetic devices, have been reported previously (1). Thus, microbiology laboratories may be required to perform proper daptomycin susceptibility testing. Since a daptomycin disk diffusion test has not been developed, daptomycin susceptibility has to be evaluated by reference methods (2, 3) or the Etest method. In the present study, we evaluated the correlation between vancomycin and daptomycin MICs obtained by the Etest technique and the CLSI reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.(This study was presented in part at the 48th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy-46th Infectious Diseases Society of America meeting, Washington, DC, 25 to 28 October 2008.)A total of 1,800 MRSA strains from nine hospitals, one in each of the U.S. census regions, were tested. Each medical center contributed 200 MRSA strains collected from patients with bloodstream infections from 2002 through 2006 (target, 40 strains per year per center). The participant centers were as follows: Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; New York Hospital Queens, New York, NY; Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA; University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; and the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.MICs of daptomycin and vancomycin were determined by the reference BMD method (using frozen-form panels), with the appropriate medium variation (the addition of 50 mg/liter of calcium) for testing daptomycin (2). Thirty-six precise incremental dilutions of vancomycin between 64 and 0.06 μg/ml (64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1.875, 1.75, 1.625, 1.5, 1.375, 1.25, 1.125, 1, 0.938, 0.875, 0.813, 0.75, 0.688, 0.625, 0.563, 0.5, 0.469, 0.438, 0.406, 0.375, 0.344, 0.313, 0.281, 0.25, 0.188, 0.12, 0.094, and 0.06 μg/ml) were tested, and 20 dilutions of daptomycin between 16 and 0.06 μg/ml (16, 8, 4, 2, 1.5, 1, 0.875, 0.75, 0.625, 0.5, 0.438, 0.375, 0.313, 0.25, 0.219, 0.188, 0.156, 0.12, 0.094, and 0.06 μg/ml) were tested. Isolates were also evaluated by Etest for susceptibilities to daptomycin and vancomycin according to the recommendations of the Etest manufacturer (AB Biodisk). To compare the results obtained with the BMD method and those obtained with the Etest technique, BMD results were rounded up to the next dilution provided for the Etest method. Resistance to oxacillin was confirmed by the reference BMD method (dilution range tested, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml) and cefoxitin susceptibilities tested by disk diffusion (2, 3). Quality control strains S. aureus ATCC 25923 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 were evaluated concurrently with every set of tests.MICs of vancomycin obtained by the Etest method were consistently higher (+0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilutions) than those obtained by the BMD method (Fig. ​(Fig.1a).1a). For strains from all centers combined, the overall vancomycin MIC mode determined by the BMD method was 0.75 μg/ml (corresponding to 75.3% of values, including those rounded up from measured 0.563-, 0.625-, and 0.688-μg/ml MICs) and 96.9% of strains exhibited vancomycin MIC results of ≤1 μg/ml. In contrast, when tested by the Etest, MICs for 58.3 and 32.1% of MRSA strains were 1.5 and 2 μg/ml, respectively (Fig. ​(Fig.1a1a).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Scattergrams showing the correlations between vancomycin (a) and daptomycin (b) MICs obtained by the BMD method and the Etest. Solid lines indicate CLSI susceptibility breakpoints, and broken lines indicate complete agreement between results from the two methods.For all strains except one, the Etest yielded higher vancomycin MICs than the reference method. Among 1,628 strains for which the Etest MIC was 1.5 μg/ml (1,050 strains) or 2 μg/ml (578 strains), only 44 (2.7%) had BMD MIC results of >1 μg/ml. Furthermore, among 13 strains considered to be nonsusceptible (intermediate) to vancomycin (MIC, 3 or 4 μg/ml) according to the Etest results, only 1 had a vancomycin MIC result of >2 μg/ml by the reference method, demonstrating a positive predictive value of only 7.7%.Etest MICs of daptomycin were also slightly elevated (+0.5 to 1 log₂ dilution) compared to BMD MICs (Fig. ​(Fig.1b).1b). When tested by the BMD method, the daptomycin MIC mode was 0.19 μg/ml (corresponding to 55.4% of values, including MICs of 0.156 and 0.188 μg/ml) and 92.9% of strains exhibited daptomycin MIC results of ≤0.25 μg/ml. In contrast, when tested by the Etest, the MIC mode was 0.38 μg/ml (corresponding to 37.2% of values), which is 1 doubling dilution higher than that obtained by the BMD method. Among nine strains considered to be daptomycin nonsusceptible according to the Etest results, only two had a MIC result of >1 μg/ml when tested by the reference BMD method, demonstrating a positive predictive value of 22.2% (Fig. ​(Fig.1b1b).Although the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains and that of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus strains are reasons for concern, these organisms still are extremely rare (12). Nevertheless, a number of studies have demonstrated increased clinical failure with MRSA isolates for which vancomycin MICs are increased (>1 μg/ml) but still within the CLSI-defined susceptibility range (≤2 μg/ml) (3, 11, 13). In addition, there are reports of the increase of vancomycin MICs over time (designated “MIC creep”) at individual institutions, although this trend has not been validated by large, multi-institutional studies (14). Thus, it is becoming clear to physicians that an “S” result for vancomycin is not sufficient to appropriately guide therapy and that the clinical laboratory should provide accurate and reliable MICs.Since most clinical laboratories use automated systems to perform susceptibility testing and these systems do not provide a precise vancomycin MIC, many laboratories are using alternative methods for testing vancomycin in selected cases (6). The Etest method is an attractive option for alternative vancomycin testing since it is easy to perform and cost-effective for testing only one drug-bug combination. However, the results of the present study clearly show that the Etest provides vancomycin and daptomycin MIC results consistently higher (by 0.5 to 1.5 log₂ dilutions) than those provided by precisely performed reference BMD tests. Furthermore, the fact that the higher vancomycin MIC results provided by the Etest appear to be more reliable in predicting vancomycin treatment responses (6) indicates that the vancomycin susceptibility breakpoint should be reevaluated.The susceptibility testing method used may have a large impact on physician decisions for vancomycin and daptomycin treatment of MRSA infections. According to the information presented here, the dominant MRSA population (91.2% of strains) would be categorized as vancomycin nonsusceptible by the Etest method if the susceptibility breakpoint was adjusted to ≤1 μg/ml, as suggested by some published clinical outcome studies on recognizing isolates for which vancomycin MICs are 2 μg/ml (4, 5, 8-10, 14). Daptomycin MICs were also affected by the method used, but to a lesser degree (MICs were found to be 0.5 to 1 dilution step higher by the Etest method than by the reference method, with 0.4% false-nonsusceptible results), and may also suffer from the perception of declining daptomycin potency.     

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Telavancin against Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure

Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with potent activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). The activity of telavancin against MRSA and MSSA after prior vancomycin exposure was studied in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Two clinical MRSA and two MSSA isolates, all with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, were subjected to humanized free drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h) for 96 h, telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 96 h, and vancomycin at 1 g q12h for 72 h followed by telavancin at 750 mg q24h for 48 h (120 h total). The microbiological responses were measured by changes from 0 h in log₁₀ CFU/ml at the end of experiments and area under the bacterial killing and regrowth curves over 96 h (AUBC₀₋₉₆). The control isolates grew to 8.8 ± 0.3 log₁₀ CFU/ml. Initially, all regimens caused −4.5 ± 0.9 reductions in log₁₀ CFU/ml by 48 h followed by slight regrowth over the following 48 to 72 h. After 96 h, vancomycin and telavancin achieved −3.7 ± 0.9 and −3.8 ± 0.8 log₁₀ CFU/ml changes from baseline, respectively (P = 0.74). Sequential exposure to telavancin after vancomycin did not result in additional CFU reductions or increases, with ultimate log₁₀ CFU/ml reductions of −4.3 ± 1.1 at 96 h and −4.2 ± 1.3 at 120 h (P > 0.05 for all comparisons at 96 h). The AUBC_0–96 was significantly smaller for the regimen of telavancin for 96 h than for the regimens of vancomycin for 96 h and vancomycin followed by telavancin (P ≤ 0.04). No resistance was observed throughout the experiment. Against these MRSA and MSSA isolates with vancomycin MICs of 2 μg/ml, telavancin was comparable with vancomycin and its activity was unaffected by prior vancomycin exposure.     

Characterization of High-Level Daptomycin Resistance in Viridans Group Streptococci Developed upon In Vitro Exposure to Daptomycin

Viridans group streptococci (VGS) are part of the normal flora that may cause bacteremia, often leading to endocarditis. We evaluated daptomycin against four clinical strains of VGS (MICs = 1 or 2 μg/ml) using an in vitro-simulated endocardial vegetation model, a simulated bacteremia model, and kill curves. Daptomycin exposure was simulated at 6 mg/kg of body weight and 8 mg/kg every 24 h for endocardial and bacteremia models. Total drug concentrations were used for analyses containing protein (albumin and pooled human serum), and free (unbound) drug concentrations (93% protein bound) were used for analyses not containing protein. Daptomycin MICs in the presence of protein were significantly higher than those in the absence of protein. Despite MICs below or at the susceptible breakpoint, all daptomycin regimens demonstrated limited kill in both pharmacodynamic models. A reduction of approximately 1 to 2 log₁₀ CFU was seen for all isolates and dosages except daptomycin at 6 mg/kg, which achieved a reduction of 2.7 log₁₀ CFU/g against one strain (Streptococcus gordonii 1649) in the endocardial model. Activity was similar in both pharmacodynamic models in the presence or absence of protein. Similar activity was noted in the kill curves over all multiples of the MIC. Regrowth by 24 h was seen even at 8× MIC. Postexposure daptomycin MICs for both pharmacodynamic models increased to >256 μg/ml for all isolates by 24 and 72 h. Despite susceptibility to daptomycin by standard MIC methods, these VGS developed high-level daptomycin resistance (HLDR) after a short duration following drug exposure not attributed to modification or inactivation of daptomycin. Further evaluation is warranted to determine the mechanism of resistance and clinical implications.     

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Human Simulated Exposures of Ceftaroline and Daptomycin against MRSA,hVISA, and VISA with and without Prior Vancomycin Exposure

The effects of prior vancomycin exposure on ceftaroline and daptomycin therapy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have not been widely studied. Humanized free-drug exposures of vancomycin at 1 g every 12 h (q12h), ceftaroline at 600 mg q12h, and daptomycin at 10 mg/kg of body weight q24h were simulated in a 96-h in vitro pharmacodynamic model against three MRSA isolates, including one heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) isolate and one VISA isolate. A total of five regimens were tested: vancomycin, ceftaroline, and daptomycin alone for the entire 96 h, and then sequential therapy with vancomycin for 48 h followed by ceftaroline or daptomycin for 48 h. Microbiological responses were measured by the changes in log₁₀ CFU during 96 h from baseline. Control isolates grew to 9.16 ± 0.32, 9.13 ± 0.14, and 8.69 ± 0.28 log₁₀ CFU for MRSA, hVISA, and VISA, respectively. Vancomycin initially achieved ≥3 log₁₀ CFU reductions against the MRSA and hVISA isolates, followed by regrowth beginning at 48 h; minimal activity was observed against VISA. The change in 96-h log₁₀ CFU was largest for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (−5.22 ± 1.2, P = 0.010 versus ceftaroline) and for sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by ceftaroline (−3.60 ± 0.6, P = 0.037 versus daptomycin), compared with daptomycin (−2.24 ± 1.0), vancomycin (−1.40 ± 1.8), and sequential therapy with vancomycin followed by daptomycin (−1.32 ± 1.0, P > 0.5 for the last three regimens). Prior exposure of vancomycin at 1 g q12h reduced the initial microbiological response of daptomycin, particularly for hVISA and VISA isolates, but did not affect the response of ceftaroline. In the scenario of poor vancomycin response for high-inoculum MRSA infection, a ceftaroline-containing regimen may be preferred.