Fractionated perineal high-dose-rate temporary brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: is lymph node sampling necessary?

PURPOSE: To study the influence of imaging based nodal staging and local dose escalation by a high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost in the treatment of locally confined prostate cancer in terms of prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival (biochemical non-evidence of disease (bNED)), treatment toxicity and prognostic variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prospectively recorded files of 144 men aged in a median of 68 years with a mean follow-up of 8 years (60-171 months) receiving curatively intended, transrectal ultrasound guided high-dose-rate 192-iridium-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for locally confined prostate cancer were analyzed. T-stages were defined by digital rectal investigation and transrectal sonography (TRUS), nodal staging was performed with computed tomography(CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (UICC/AJCR 1992). Twenty-nine patients (20.1%) had T1b-T2a tumors, and 115 patients had T2b-T3 tumors. Median initial PSA (iPSA) was 12.15 ng x mL(-1) (mean 25.61 ng x mL(-1)). The total planned dose applied by external beam radiation was 50 Gy in the pelvis, and 40 Gy in the prostate by in-field-dose modification by individual compensators. The perineal, TRUS guided HDR-BT was delivered in two fractions of 15 Gy each. The target of BT boost was the peripheral zone of the prostate. RESULTS: The overall survival was 71.5% and that of the disease free survival 82.6%. Freedom from distant metastases in T3 stage was 91.3%, whereas for G3 lesions, it was 88.23%. The bNED rate was 72.9%. Regarding treatment related late toxicity according to the EORTC/RTOG score, we observed grade 1, 2, 3 proctitis in 9.72%, 6.94%, 4.10% as well as grade 1, 2, 3 cystitis in 12.5%, 4.16%, 2.08%, respectively. Grade 4 and 5 proctitis or cystitis were not registered. CONCLUSION: The minimum 5-year and mean 8-year results confirm that local dose escalation by TRUS guided perineal HDR-BT and complementary external beam radiation of the pelvic lymphatics has curative potential in men with locally confined high-risk prostate cancer, although surgical staging results in the literature suggest a high probabilityof microscopic nodal involvements at the level of 25.61 ng x mL(-1) mean PSA. The influence of additional short-term (< 6 months) hormonal ablation on the treatment results could not be stated.     

Hypofractionated radiotherapy with carbon ion beams for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: Analysis of the results of hypofractionated conformal carbon ion radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer was performed, with special regard to normal tissue morbidity and biochemical relapse-free rate (bNED). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Analysis was performed for 201 patients treated with the dose fractionation regimen established during three clinical trials performed between June 1995 and February 2004. Outcomes were measured in terms of toxicity, survival, freedom from local recurrence, and bNED. RESULTS: No Grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed in either the rectum or genitourinary system, and the incidences of Grade 2 rectum or genitourinary morbidity were only 1.0% and 6.0%, respectively. The overall 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 83.2% without any local recurrence. Gleason score, initial PSA, and T stage were all significant prognostic factors for bNED, which was 97.1% in patients with Gleason score < or =7 and initial PSA <20 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionated carbon ion radiotherapy with the established dose fractionation regimen yielded satisfactory bNED without local recurrence and with minimal morbidity. Long-term results are necessary to confirm the utility of carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.     

Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of radiotherapy dose on prostate cancer patient outcome and biopsy positivity in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 305 stage T1 through T3 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy or 78 Gy of external-beam radiotherapy between 1993 and 1998. Of these, 301 were assessable; stratification was based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (PSA). Dose was prescribed to the isocenter at 2 Gy per fraction. All patients underwent planning pelvic computed tomography scan to confirm prostate position. Treatment failure was defined as an increasing PSA on three consecutive follow-up visits or the initiation of salvage treatment. Median follow-up was 40 months. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were randomized to the 70-Gy arm and 151 to the 78-Gy arm. The difference in freedom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups, respectively, at 5 years was marginally significant (log-rank P: =.058). Multiple-covariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that the study randomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and stage. The patients who benefited most from the 8-Gy dose escalation were those with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy arms, respectively. There was no difference between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: A modest dose increase of 8 Gy using conformal radiotherapy resulted in a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL. These findings document that local persistence of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients is a major problem when doses of 70 Gy or less are used.     

Outcome and predictive factors for patients with Gleason score 7 prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the biochemical outcome and factors predictive of outcome in prostate carcinoma patients with Gleason score 7 tumors who were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). METHODS: Between August 1990 and October 1997, 163 T1-T3NXM0 prostate carcinoma patients with Gleason score 7 were treated with definitive 3DCRT alone. The median follow-up, International Commission on Radiological Units dose, and pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) for the entire group were 50 months, 76 grays (Gy), and 11.4 ng/mL, respectively. Independent predictors based on multivariate results were used to stratify the patients into prognostic groups for which biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control was reported. Biochemical NED failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition. RESULTS: The 5-year bNED control for all patients was 66%. Stratified by pretreatment PSA, 5-year bNED control rates were 83%, 65%, and 21% for 0-9.9 ng/mL, 10-19.9 ng/mL, and > or =20 ng/mL, respectively. Dose to the central axis was found to be a significant treatment factor, with patients receiving > or =76 Gy experiencing 76% 5-year bNED control versus 54% when treated with <76 Gy to isocenter. Pretreatment PSA, dose, and palpation stage were significant independent predictors for bNED control upon multivariate analysis. Patients with a PSA <10 ng/mL who received a dose of > or =76 Gy had excellent 5-year bNED control of 100% compared with 50% bNED if patients had PSA >10 ng/mL or received radiation therapy doses of <76 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Gleason score 7 adenocarcinoma who had a pretreatment PSA <10 ng/mL and received doses of > or =76 Gy had excellent 5-year bNED control, emphasizing the importance of higher central axis doses in treating Gleason 7 tumors. Patients with intermediate PSA (10-19.9 ng/mL) also required doses > or =76 Gy. Pretreatment PSA > or = 20 ng/mL portends a very poor bNED outcome for Gleason 7 patients treated with radiation therapy alone, and thus efforts should be directed toward multimodal or long term hormonal treatment strategies.     

Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up

PURPOSE: This communication reports the long-term results of the original group of prostate cancer patients who participated in the first prospective Fox Chase Cancer Center radiation dose escalation study for which 8-12 years of follow-up is now available. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1, 1989 and October 31, 1992, 232 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy only at Fox Chase Cancer Center in a prospective dose-escalation study. Of these patients, 229 were assessable. The 8-, 10-, and 12-year actuarial rates of biochemical control (biochemically no evidence of disease [bNED]), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), and morbidity were calculated. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess multivariately the predictors of bNED control and FDM, including pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (continuous), tumor stage (T1/T2a vs. T2b/T3), Gleason score (2-6 vs. 7-10), and radiation dose (continuous). The median total dose for all patients was 74 Gy (range 67-81). The median follow-up for living patients was 110 months (range 89-147). bNED control was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. RESULTS: The actuarial bNED control for all patients included in this series was 55% at 5 years, 48% at 10 years, and 48% at 12 years. Patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 10-20 ng/mL had statistically significant differences (19% vs. 31% vs. 84%, p = 0.0003) in bNED control when stratified by dose (<71.5, 71.5-75.6, and > 75.6 Gy, respectively) on univariate analysis. For the 229 patients with follow-up, 124 (54%) were clinically and biochemically without evidence of disease. Sixty-nine patients were alive at the time of last follow-up, and 55 patients were dead of intercurrent disease. On multivariate analysis, radiation dose was a statistically significant predictor of bNED control for all patients and for unfavorable patients with a pretreatment PSA <10 ng/mL. For the patients with a pretreatment PSA level of 10-20 ng/mL, the radiation dose was a statistically significant predictor across all groups. No radiation dose response was seen for those patients with a pretreatment PSA level >20 ng/mL, although large numbers of patients are required to demonstrate a difference. The radiation dose, Gleason score, and palpation T stage were significant predictors for the entire patient set, as well as for those with pretreatment PSA levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL. The FDM rate for all patients included in this series was 89%, 83%, and 83% at 5, 10, and 12 years, respectively. For patients with pretreatment PSA levels <10 ng/mL, all four covariates (radiation dose, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, and palpation T stage) were significant predictors of distance metastasis. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scale, no difference was noted in the frequency of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary and Grade 3 gastrointestinal morbidity when patients in this data set were stratified by radiation dose. However, a significant increase occurred in Grade 2 gastrointestinal complications as the radiation dose increased. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of the original Fox Chase radiation dose escalation study with >9 years of median follow-up confirm the existence of a dose response for both bNED control and FDM. The dose response in prostate cancer is real, and the absence of biochemical recurrence after 8 years demonstrates the lack of late failure and suggests cure.     

Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To report the long-term results of a randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1993 to 1998, a total of 301 patients with stage T1b to T3 prostate cancer were accrued to a randomized external beam dose escalation trial using 70 Gy versus 78 Gy. The median follow-up is now 8.7 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compute rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (nadir + 2), clinical failure, distant metastasis, disease-specific, and overall survival as well as complication rates at 8 years post-treatment. RESULTS: For all patients, freedom from biochemical or clinical failure (FFF) was superior for the 78-Gy arm, 78%, as compared with 59% for the 70-Gy arm (p = 0.004, and an even greater benefit was seen in patients with initial PSA >10 ng/ml (78% vs. 39%, p = 0.001). The clinical failure rate was significantly reduced in the 78-Gy arm as well (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.014). Twice as many patients either died of prostate cancer or are currently alive with cancer in the 70-Gy arm. Gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or greater occurred twice as often in the high dose patients (26% vs. 13%), although genitourinary toxicity of grade 2 or greater was less (13% vs. 8%) and not statistically significantly different. Dose-volume histogram analysis showed that the complication rate could be significantly decreased by reducing the amount of treated rectum. CONCLUSIONS: Modest escalation in radiotherapy dose improved freedom from biochemical and clinical progression with the largest benefit in prostate cancer patients with PSA >10 ng/ml.     

Hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy in carcinoma of the prostate: five-year outcome analysis

PURPOSE: Recent publications have indicated that the alpha/beta ratios for carcinoma of the prostate are much lower than had originally been thought, suggesting that prostate cancer may be highly sensitive to fraction size. We have reviewed our unique experience of the use of 3.13 Gy fractions in a large cohort of men treated homogeneously in a single institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The outcome for 705 men with T1-T4, N0, M0 prostate cancer who received conformal radiotherapy between 1995 and 1998 at this center was analyzed. No patient received hormonal manipulation. Mean age was 68 years (range: 49-84 years). Median pretreatment PSA was 13 ng/mL (range: 0.6-270 ng/mL). Disease characteristics were as follows: Stage T1, 125 (18%); T2, 365 (52%); T3/4, 215 (30%); Gleason 2-6, 463 (66%); Gleason 7-10, 242 (34%); pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, 291 (41%); 10 to < or =20, 228 (32%); >20, 186 (27%). Median follow-up was 48 months (range: 1-82 months). Biochemical-free survival (bNED) was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Radiotherapy was delivered to a planning target volume (prostate plus all/base of the seminal vesicles dependent on risk criteria with a 1-cm margin) with a 4-field conformal technique to a dose of 50 Gy in 16 daily fractions over 22 days. RESULTS: The 5-year bNED survival was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with pretreatment PSA, stage, and Gleason score. Five-year bNED rates with respect to pretreatment characteristics were as follows: 73% (PSA < or =10), 52% (>10-20), 35% (>20), 64% (Stage T1/2), 38% (T3/4), 61% (Gleason score 2-6), and 46% (Gleason > or =7). When patients were grouped into good (Stage T1/2, PSA < or =10 ng/mL, and Gleason score <7) (n = 181), intermediate (1 raised value) (n = 247), or poor (2 or more raised values) (n = 277) prognostic groups, the bNED was, respectively, 82%, 56%, and 39%. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade > or =2 bowel toxicity was 5% and bladder 9%. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the delivery of a relatively low total dose using a hypofractionated regime results in similar tumor control and normal-tissue toxicity to 65-70 Gy delivered in 1.8-2 Gy fractions. These data suggest that this is an acceptable regime for good-prognosis patients. However, because of the evidence for a dose effect at doses above 70 Gy with "conventional fractionation," we are now treating intermediate- and poor-risk patients within a hypofractionated dose escalation trial to 60 Gy in 20 fractions using intensity- modulated radiotherapy.     

Defining the optimal radiation dose with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma by using recursive partitioning techniques

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the effect of dose and its interaction with known prognostic variables, including pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), and T classification, on patients with nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) alone using recursive partitioning analysis. METHODS: Between November 1987 and November 1997, 939 patients with nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma were treated with 3DCRT alone at Fox Chase Cancer Center. Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control was defined using the American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus definition. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to identify subgroups with similar risks of bNED failure. Prognostic factors used in the model included pretreatment PSA, GS, T classification, and radiation dose. The median follow-up was 47 months (range, 2-133 months). RESULTS: Twelve terminal nodes of the decision tree were merged to form four prognostic groups with similar bNED control rates. The 5-year actuarial rates of bNED control rates for Groups I, II, III, and IV were 84%, 41%, 16%, and 67%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Increasing the dose to greater than 7235 centigray (cGy) improved bNED control rates for patients with PSA levels of 10-19.9 ng/mL and T1/2a classification disease. Increasing the dose to greater than 7629 cGy improved bNED control rates for patients with T2b/3 classification disease with PSA levels less than 20 ng/mL. Patients with PSA levels greater than or equal to 20 ng/mL need high-dose 3DCRT. For those patients with GS 2-6 and T1/2a classification disease, treatment with greater than 7400 cGy resulted in 67% bNED control rate versus 16% at 5 years for treatment with less than 7400 cGy. High radiation dose (> 7700 cGy) improved bNED control rate from 16% to 41% for patients with high-risk disease (PSA > or = 20 ng/mL and GS 7-10) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The authors showed that with recursive partitioning techniques radiation dose continues to be an important predictor of bNED control rate and that a radiation dose response for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma exists. Patients with one or more prognostic feature (PSA > 10 ng/mL, classification T2b/T3, GS 7-10, or the presence of perineural invasion) achieve similar rates of bNED control compared with those patients with lower volume disease when radiation dose is increased.     

Hazards of dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of escalating the dose in definitive prostate cancer radiotherapy vs. the associated risk of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1987 and 1999, 1087 patients with clinical Stage T1b-T3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were definitively irradiated without hormonal therapy and had a pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score recorded. The median follow-up was 65 months. Doses ranged from 64 to 78 Gy, with the treatment techniques corresponding to the year of therapy and the prescribed dose. A total of 301 patients were treated on a randomized protocol to either 70 or 78 Gy. Also, 163 patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal therapy and had dose-volume histograms available for review. RESULTS: Tumor stage, grade, pretreatment PSA level, and radiation dose were all independent predictors of PSA disease-free survival (PSA-DFS) in multivariate analysis. The hazard rate for biochemical failure peaked at 1.5-3 years after radiotherapy. Although a statistically significant dose effect on PSA-DFS was found in the pretreatment PSA levels of those with both < or =10 ng/mL and >10 ng/mL, in those with a pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL, the improvement in outcome was only seen going from a dose level of 64-66 Gy to 68-70 Gy with a 5-year PSA-DFS rate of 66% vs. 81% (p <0.0001). This was also confirmed by the data from the randomized patients who showed no difference in outcome whether treated to 70 Gy or 78 Gy. In patients with a pretreatment PSA level >10 ng/mL, a statistically significant improvement was found in disease-free outcome among the 64-66-Gy, 68-70-Gy, and 78-Gy levels. PSA-DFS was approximately 50% better at each higher dose level at 5 and 8 years after treatment. The dose had a statistically significant impact in both intermediate- and high-risk groups. Rectal morbidity was both dose and volume related. Although at 5 years after therapy, the Grade 2-3 rectal complication rate was twice as high for patients treated to 78 Gy than to 70 Gy, 26% vs. 12%, this risk could be markedly diminished by adhering to dose-volume constraints. CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients, although it appears that radiation-dose escalation may improve PSA-DF outcome, the price paid in treatment morbidity can be high without adequate attention to dose-volume constraints of normal tissue. Care must be taken to consider not only the hazard of tumor recurrence but also that of complications.     

External beam radiotherapy dose response characteristics of 1127 men with prostate cancer treated in the PSA era

PURPOSE: To characterize the relationship of radiotherapy dose to prostate cancer patient outcome, with an emphasis on the influence of pretreatment prognostic variables. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The 1127 Stage T1-T4 prostate cancer patients examined were treated consecutively with definitive external beam radiotherapy at the University of Texas-M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1987 to 1997. All had a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. Treatment failure was defined as two consecutive PSA elevations on follow-up. There were 994 patients treated with a four-field box throughout to 60-70 Gy after a small reduction at 46 Gy and 161 treated with a six-field conformal boost after 46 Gy to 74-78 Gy. No patient received neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen ablation. Median follow-up was 51.8 months. RESULTS: Patients were divided into three radiotherapy dose groups consisting of 67-77 Gy (n = 495), and >77 Gy (n = 132). Relative to other prognostic factors, there were fewer patients treated to the highest dose level with a pretreatment PSA (PSAB) 20 ng/ml, Stage T3/T4 disease, or a Gleason score of 2-6. Actuarial 4-year freedom from biochemical failure (bNED) rates for the entire cohort were 54%, 71%, and 77% (p < 0.0001) for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose groups. PSAB, palpable stage, and Gleason score were also highly significant. In Cox proportional hazards regression, dose (p < 0. 0001 as a continuous or categorical variable) was an independent predictor of bNED, as were the other prognostic factors. Pairwise univariate comparisons showed that an increase in dose from 67-77 Gy was associated with improved bNED rates for all PSAB (10), stage (T1/T2 and T3/T4), and Gleason score (2-6 and 7-10) subgroups tested. In contrast, the only prognostic group that benefited from raising dose from >67-77 Gy to >77 Gy was patients with a PSAB >10 ng/ml; although trends were noted for Stage T1/T2 and Gleason 2-6 patients. Patients with the combined features of a PSAB >10 ng/ml and Stage T1/T2 disease had 4-year bNED rates of 61% and 93% at the intermediate- and high-dose levels. A strongly significant linear association between dose (60-78 Gy) and 4-year actuarial bNED was demonstrated for patients with these intermediate-risk features. CONCLUSION: Prostate cancer dose response to external beam radiotherapy should be considered in the context of pretreatment prognostic factors. Our data indicate that, for favorable patients with a PSAB of 67-77 Gy provide the same rate of control as higher doses. However, longer follow-up may reveal a benefit to dose escalation >77 Gy, even in this favorable subset. Substantial and clinically relevant enhancements in bNED were seen at all dose levels for moderate-risk patients, such as those having a PSAB >10 ng/ml and Stage T1/T2 disease. Sustained bNED was not realized for high-risk patients, even using 78 Gy; these patients may be best treated with higher doses, whole pelvic irradiation, and/or androgen ablation plus radiation.     

Matched-pair analysis of conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost versus external-beam radiation therapy alone for locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare our institution's experience in treating locally advanced prostate cancer with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone to EBRT in combination with conformal interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts (EBRT + HDR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 1998, 161 patients with locally advanced prostate cancer were prospectively treated with EBRT + HDR at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible for study entry: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of >/= 10.0 ng/mL, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b to T3c. Pelvic EBRT (46.0 Gy) was supplemented with three (1991 through 1995) or two (1995 through 1998) ultrasound-guided transperineal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. The brachytherapy dose was escalated from 5.50 to 10.50 Gy per implant. Each of the 161 EBRT + HDR patients was randomly matched with a unique EBRT-alone patient. Patients were matched according to PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, and follow-up duration. The median PSA follow-up was 2.5 years for both EBRT + HDR and EBRT alone. RESULTS: EBRT + HDR patients demonstrated significantly lower PSA nadir levels (median, 0.4 ng/mL) compared with those receiving EBRT alone (median, 1.1 ng/mL). The 5-year biochemical control rates for EBRT + HDR versus EBRT-alone patients were 67% versus 44%, respectively (P <.001). On multivariate analyses, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, T stage, and the use of EBRT alone were significantly associated with biochemical failure. Those patients in both treatment groups who experienced biochemical failure had a lower 5-year cause-specific survival rate than patients who were biochemically controlled (84% v 100%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Locally advanced prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT + HDR demonstrate improved biochemical control compared with those who are treated with conventional doses of EBRT alone.     

Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes,treatment optimization,and future directions

Purpose: To report the 5-year outcomes of dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment (3DCRT) of prostate cancer.Methods and Materials: Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients were treated with 3DCRT alone between 6/89 and 10/92 with ICRU reporting point dose that increased from 63 to 79 Gy. The median follow-up was 60 months, and any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed bNED. Biochemical failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rising on two consecutive recordings and exceeding 1.5 ng/ml. Morbidity was reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale, the Late Effects Normal Tissue (LENT) scale, and a Fox Chase modification of the latter (FC-LENT). All patients were treated with a four-field technique with a 1 cm clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin to the prostate or prostate boost; the CTV and gross tumor volume (GTV) were the same. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan-Meier and cumulative incidence methods and compared using the log rank and Gray’s test statistic, respectively. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors predictive of the various measures of outcome. Five-year Kaplan-Meier bNED rates were utilized by dose group to estimate logit response models for bNED and late morbidity.Results: PSA <10 ng/ml: No dose response was demonstrated using estimated bNED rates or by analysis of PSA nadir vs. dose. PSA 10–19.9 ng/ml: A bNED dose response was demonstrated (p = 0.02) using the log rank test. The logit response model showed 5-year bNED rates of 35% at 70 Gy and 75% at 76 Gy (p = 0.0049) and illustrated the relative ineffectiveness of conventional dose treatment. PSA 20+ ng/ml: A bNED dose response was demonstrated (p = 0.02) using the log rank test. The logit response model indicated a 5-year bNED rate of 10% at 70 Gy and 32% at 76 Gy (p = 0.10). Morbidity: Dose response was demonstrated for FC-LENT grade 2 and grade 3,4 GI morbidity and for LENT grade 2 GU sequelae. RTOG grade 3,4 GI morbidity at 5 years was <1%. Factors associated with bNED, cause-specific survival, and metastasis were studied using Cox multivariate analysis. Pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0001), Gleason score 7–10 (p = 0.0001), and dose (p = 0.017) were significantly predictive of bNED. For each 1 Gy increase in dose, the hazard of bNED failure decreased by 8%. Palpation stage was associated with cause-specific survival (p = 0.002) and distant metastasis (p = 0.0004). Gleason score was also predictive of distant metastasis (p = 0.02).Conclusions: A dose response was observed for patients with pretreatment PSA >10 ng/ml based on 5-year bNED results. No dose response was observed for patients with pretreatment PSA <10 ng/ml. Dose response was observed for FC-LENT grade 2 and grade 3,4 GI sequelae and for LENT grade 2 GU sequelae. Optimization of treatment was made possible by the results in this report. The improvement in 5-year bNED rates for patients with PSA levels >10 ng/ml strongly suggests that clinical trials employing radiation should investigate the use of 3DCRT and prostate doses of 76–80 Gy.     

Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a dose response exists for biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) control in prostate cancer patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 10 ng/mL and to identify the patient subgroups affected. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 5/89 and 10/97, 488 T1-T3 NX-0 M0 prostate cancer patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/mL were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) alone. Median and mean pretreatment PSA values were 6.3 and 6.2, respectively. Gleason scores of 2-6 and 7-10 were noted in 386 and 102 men, respectively. AJCC 1992 palpation T1-T2AB tumors were noted in 415 patients. Perineural invasion (PNI) was noted in 60 men. Mean and median age was 67 and 68 years, respectively. Dose to the center of the prostate ranged from 6260 cGy to 8409 cGy with a mean and median of 7423 cGy and 7278 cGy, respectively. Patients were stratified into three groups according to dose: <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy. Median dose in these three groups was 7067 cGy, 7278 cGy, and 7734 cGy, respectively. Univariate analysis was performed to determine differences in bNED control (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology [ASTRO] Consensus Guidelines definition of failure) by dose group for the entire cohort, for 310 good prognosis patients (T1-T2A, Gleason score 2-6, absence of PNI), and for 178 poor prognosis patients (T2B-T3 or Gleason score 7-10 or presence of PNI) (1). Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to determine if dose was an independent predictor of bNED control. Median follow-up was 36 months. RESULTS: A dose response was not demonstrated for the entire group of patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL. Doses of <7250 cGy, 7250-7599 cGy, and > or =7600 cGy were associated with 5-year bNED control rates of 73%, 86%, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.12). MVA demonstrated prognosis group (p = 0. 038) to be the only independent predictor of bNED control. Good prognosis patients had a 5-year bNED of 85% and no dose response was seen. The subgroup of poor prognosis patients demonstrated a 5-year bNED control rate of 81% and a dose response was seen for those receiving > or =7600 cGy, compared to the two lower dose groups (94% vs. 75% vs. 70%; p = 0.0062). MVA for the poor prognosis subset demonstrated dose (p = 0.01) to be the only independent predictor for improved bNED control. CONCLUSIONS: The poor prognosis subset of PSA < or =10 ng/mL prostate cancer patients benefit from dose escalation. A dose response is not demonstrated for prostate cancer patients with pretreatment PSA < or =10 ng/mL and other favorable features.     

Does short-term androgen deprivation substitute for radiation dose in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: Randomized trials have corroborated the clinical benefit of adding androgen deprivation (AD) to radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Another competing strategy is to escalate the RT dose using three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT). In this analysis, we asked whether the addition of short-term AD (STAD) (20 ng/mL, Gleason score 8-10, or T3-4) prostate cancer is an effective substitute for dose escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 1, 1990 and November 30, 1998, 296 high-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT alone (n = 206) or in combination with STAD (n = 90). The patient characteristics were median age 68 years, median follow-up 58 months, pretreatment initial prostate-specific antigen 21.8 ng/mL, RT dose 75 Gy, STAD duration 3 months, and time off STAD 64 months. The impact of STAD with respect to dose was examined using univariate analysis for dose ranges of <75 Gy and >or=75 Gy. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent correlates of freedom from biochemical failure (bNED), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), and overall survival. In a separate matched-pair analysis (n = 44 per group), those treated to <75 Gy + STAD (Group A) were compared with those who received >or=75 Gy alone (Group B). RESULTS: On univariate analysis, the addition of STAD had no impact on bNED, FDM, or overall survival in either dose group. On multivariate analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen level, palpation T stage, and RT dose were significant correlates of bNED. For FDM and overall survival, the significant covariates were palpation T stage and Gleason score, respectively. Finally, in matched-pair analysis, the higher RT dose group had a significantly greater bNED rate at 5 years (Group A 35% vs. Group B 57%, p = 0.0190). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that STAD, as used here (median 3 months), is not a substitute for RT dose in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. RT dose is an essential element in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.     

Effect of higher radiation dose on biochemical control after radical prostatectomy for pT3N0 prostate cancer

Purpose: The appropriate radiation dose has not been determined for postoperative radiation therapy (RT) of prostate cancer. Postoperative PSA level is a useful marker of local residual disease, and may allow evaluation of RT dose–response after radical prostatectomy.Methods and Materials: Between 1989 and 1996, 86 consecutive patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer who did not receive prior hormonal therapy or chemotherapy were irradiated postoperatively. All patients received 55.8 to 70.2 Gy (median = 64.8 Gy) to the prostatic/seminal vesicle bed. Patients were judged to be free of biochemical failure (bNED) if their PSA remained undetectable or decreased to undetectable level (< 0.2 ng/ml). The median follow-up time was 32 months from time of irradiation.Results: Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables showed that the preRT PSA level was the most significant predictor of improved bNED survival (p < 0.001). Actuarial analyses of radiation dose grouped with preRT PSA levels found higher radiation dose to be significant (p < 0.05). For the 52 patients with an undetectable preRT PSA level, the 3-year bNED rate was 91% for patients irradiated to 61.5 Gy or more and 57% for those irradiated to lower doses (p = 0.01). For the 21 patients with preRT PSA level > 0.2 and ≤ 2.0 ng/ml, the 3-year bNED rate was 79% for patients irradiated to 64.8 Gy or more and 33% for those irradiated to a lower dose (p = 0.02). No other preRT PSA interval or radiation dose level was associated with a dose–response function.Conclusion: In patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, a radiation dose–response function may be present and depends on the preRT PSA value. Patients with high postoperative PSA levels (> 2.0 ng/ml) may be less likely to benefit from higher doses of RT, and should be considered a group for which systemic therapy should be tested.     

Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial

PURPOSE: A positive biopsy after external beam radiotherapy in patients free of any evidence of treatment failure is not synonymous with eventual recurrence. Although biopsy positivity is a predictor of outcome, the utility of biopsy status as a surrogate end point, the effect of radiation dose on biopsy status, and the interrelationships of these associations to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir level are not well-defined. These issues were investigated in a cohort of men with Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer who were randomized to receive between 70 Gy and 78 Gy and were prospectively biopsied at about 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of the 301 assessable patients in the trial, 168 underwent planned sextant or greater prostate post-RT biopsies in the absence of biochemical or clinical failure; this group constituted the study cohort. Of the 168 patients, 87 were in the 70-Gy arm and 81 in the 78-Gy arm. Biopsies were classified into four groups: negative (no tumor), atypical/suspicious cells (not diagnostic of carcinoma), carcinoma with treatment effect (CaTxEffect), and carcinoma without treatment effect (CaNoTxEffect). Any diagnosis of carcinoma in the specimen was classified as biopsy positive. Freedom from failure (FFF) included biochemical failure and/or clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated from the completion of RT. For those alive in the study cohort, the median follow-up was 65 months. RESULTS: The rate of biopsy without tumor was 42%; with atypical cells, it was 28%, with CaTxEffect 21%, and with CaNoTxEffect 9%. The overall biopsy positivity rate (CaTxEffect + CaNoTxEffect) was 30%; 28% in the 70-Gy group and 32% in the 78-Gy group (p = 0.52). The distribution of PSA nadir levels was 73% 0.5-1.0, 5% >1.0-2.0, and 1% >2.0 ng/mL. Significantly more patients randomized to 78 Gy had a PSA nadir of 2.0 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: For patients free of treatment failure at the time of prostate biopsy 2 years after RT, the prognosis of no tumor cells was the same as that of atypical/suspicious cells and CaTxEffect was the same as CaNoTxEffect. The biopsy positivity rate was not altered by dose, suggesting that most of the outcome differences between the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups were due to events occurring before prostate biopsy at 2 years and/or were not entirely dependent on biopsy status. Biopsy status is a strong prognostic factor, but, as an early end point, it may be misleading. PSA nadir appears to have little clinical value in patients treated to doses of >/=70 Gy who are failure free 2 years after RT.     

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

PURPOSE: To improve results for localized prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of hyperfractionated Iridium-192 high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as a monotherapy was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 1995 and September 1998, 22 implants were performed on 22 patients with localized prostate cancer (T1:T2:T3:T4 = 4:6:9:3) at Osaka University Hospital. Nineteen patients, who had T3-T4 tumors or pretreatment PSA >/= 20.0 ng/mL, received hormone therapy. No patient had external beam radiation. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance were performed, followed by dose optimization program. Patients were irradiated twice a day, with a time interval of more than 6 h. Total dose was 48 Gy/8 fractions/5 days or 54 Gy/9 fractions/5 days. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Median follow-up time was 31 months. RESULTS: HDR brachytherapy as a monotherapy was well-tolerated. No significant intra- or peri-operative complications occurred. No patient experienced acute toxicity of grade 3 or more. PSA levels normalized in 95% of patients within 20 months after irradiation. Four-year clinical and biochemical relapse-free rates were 95% and 55%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Acute toxicity with this method was acceptable. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.     

Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: Biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen ≥10 ng/ml

: Conformal radiation technology results in fewer late complications and allows testing of the value of higher doses in prostate cancer.

: We report the biochemical freedom from disease (bNED) rates (BNED) failure in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥ 1.5 ng/ml and rising) at 2 and 3 years for 375 consecutive patients treated with conformal technique from 66 to 79 Gy. Median follow-up was 21 months. Biochemical freedom from disease was analyzed for patients treated above and below 71 Gy as well as above and below 73 Gy. Each dose group was subdivided by pretreatment PSA level (<10, 10–19.9, and ≥20 ng/ml). Dose was stated to be at the center of prostate gland.

: There was significant improvement in bNED survuval for all patients divided by a dose above or below 71 Gy (p = 0.007) and a marginal improvement above or below 73 Gy (p = 0.07). Subdividing by pretreatment PSA level showed no benefit to the PSA < 10 ng/ml group at the higher dose but there was a significant improvement at 71 and 73 Gy for pretreatment PSA 10–19.9 ng/ml (p = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively) and for pretreatment PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml (p = 0.003 and 0.02, respectively).

: Increasing dose above 71 or 73 Gy did not result in improved bNED survuval for patient with pretreatment PSA < 10 ng/ml at 2 or 3 years. Further dose escalation studies may not be useful in the patients. A significant improvement in bNED survuval was noted for patients with pretreatment PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml treated above 71 of 73 Gy; further dose escalation studies are warranted.     

High-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external-beam radiotherapy improves local and biochemical control in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Purpose Our aim was to report the 8-year outcome of local dose escalation using high-dose-rate conformal brachytherapy combined with external irradiation for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Material and methods From June 1998 to June 2007, 134 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. The median follow-up was 45 months (12-107). Only patients considered as having high-risk criteria were accepted [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or =20 ng/ml and/or Gleason >7 and/or stage > or =T3a or two intermediate-risk criteria: PSA 11-19 ng/ml, Gleason 7, stage T2b-c]. The total dose applied by external beam radiotherapy was 46 Gy in 200-cGy daily fractions. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of the 5-week radiotherapy course. The doses administered in each application was 1,150 cGy. Any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed b-NED. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan.Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors of the measures of outcome. Results Mean follow-up for the entire group was 45 months (range 12-107). The overall survival (OS) according to Kaplan-Meier estimates was 85% (+/-5) at 5 and 8 years. The 5 and 8 years for biochemical control were 80% (+/-4%) and 73% (+/-7%), respectively, whereas for failure in tumor-free survival (TFS), they were 82% (+/-3) at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The 8-year cause-specific mortality was 10% (+/-4%). The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified the number of poor prognostic factors as independent for biochemical failure. Our report includes only patients considered as high risk, and the 8-year b-NED survival rate was 83% for patients with two intermediate-risk criteria, 78% for patients with one poor prognostic factor, 56% for two and 35% for all three (p = 0.001). There were no urethral strictures and/or urinary incontinence. Gastrointestinal toxicity grade 2 was 7.5%. Conclusions The 8-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of external-beam radiation therapy with conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for patients with high-risk tumor. The late toxicity rates were low, corroborating the excellent dose conformity.     

Relationship between prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical control

PURPOSE: In patients treated with definitive three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for localized prostatic adenocarcinoma, we sought to evaluate the relationship between pretreatment prostate gland volume and posttreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir, as well as the relationship of prostate volume and PSA nadir with biochemical control (bNED). Two subgroups were studied: favorable (PSA <10 ng/mL, Gleason score 2-6, and T1-T2A) and unfavorable (one or more: PSA >/=10 ng/mL, Gleason score 7-10, T2B-T3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 655 men (n = 271 favorable and 384 unfavorable) were treated with 3D-CRT alone between May 1989 and November 1997. All patients had information on prostate volume and a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 56, range 24-126). Of the 655 men, 481 (n = 230 favorable and 251 unfavorable) remained bNED at time of analysis, with biochemical failure defined in accordance with the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. Factors analyzed for predictors of bNED included pretreatment prostate volume, posttreatment PSA nadir, pretreatment PSA, palpation T stage, Gleason score, center of the prostate dose, and perineural invasion (PNI). We also analyzed pretreatment prostate volume and its correlation to prognostic factors. For bNED patients, the relationship between PSA nadir and prostate volume was evaluated. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, prostate volume (p = 0.04) and palpation T stage (p = 0.02) were the only predictors of biochemical failure in the favorable group. On multivariate analysis of the unfavorable group, pretreatment PSA (p <0.0001), Gleason score (p = 0.02), palpation T stage (p = 0.009), and radiation dose (p <0.0001) correlated with biochemical failure, and prostate volume and PNI did not. For all 481 bNED patients, a positive correlation between pretreatment volume and PSA nadir was demonstrated (p <0.0001). Subgroup analysis of the favorable and unfavorable patients also demonstrated a positive correlation between prostate volume and PSA nadir (p = 0.003 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Using multiple regression analysis, the following were found to be predictive of PSA nadir in all bNED patients: prostate volume (p <0.0001), pretreatment PSA (p <0.0001), palpation T stage (p = 0.0002), and radiation dose (p = 0.0034). Gleason score and PNI were not predictive. For the favorable group, palpation T stage (p = 0.0006), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0083), prostate volume (p = 0.0186), and Gleason score (p = 0.0592) were predictive of PSA nadir, and PNI and radiation dose were not predictive. In the unfavorable group, prostate volume (p = 0.0024), radiation dose (p = 0.0039), pretreatment PSA (p = 0.0182), and palpation T stage (p = 0.0296) were predictive of PSA nadir, and Gleason score and PNI were not predictive. CONCLUSION: This report is the first demonstration that prostate volume is predictive of PSA nadir for patients who are bNED in both favorable and unfavorable subgroups. PSA nadir did not correlate with bNED status in the favorable patients, but it was strongly predictive in the unfavorable patients. Prostate gland volume was also predictive of bNED failure in the favorable but not the unfavorable group.