Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori

Dyspepsia is defined as a chronic or recurrent pain centered in the upper abdomen. Dyspeptic symptoms have a high prevalence in the population and represent a common reason for patients to see a primary care physician. Therefore, dyspepsia displays a major health care burden and produces high socioeconomic costs. The etiology of dyspeptic symptoms is various and complex and has opened a wide spectrum of putative mechanisms. In a subset of patients dyspeptic symptoms are likely to originate from Helicobacter pylori infection. Population-based studies have demonstrated that H. pylori is detected more frequently in dyspeptic patients compared to controls. H. pylori eradication therapy gives modest but significant benefit in non-ulcer dyspepsia and leads to long-term symptom improvement. It also reduces the risk of developing peptic ulcer disease and other H. pylori-related gastric pathologies (i.e. atrophic gastritis, gastric cancer). The main therapeutic strategy for managing dyspepsia in patients under the age of 45 years is 'test and treat'. H. pylori eradication is recommended in patients with dyspepsia and no other gastroduodenal abnormalities than H. pylori induced gastritis. In patients presenting with alarm features a prompt upper endoscopy should be performed to exclude peptic ulcer disease, esophageal and gastric malignancies or other more rare upper gastrointestinal diseases.     

'Alarm symptoms' in patients with dyspepsia: a three-year prospective study from general practice

BACKGROUND: Ten percent of patients consulting a general practitioner (GP) because of dyspepsia report one or more alarm symptom(s): anemia, black stools, blood in stools, dysphagia, jaundice, weight loss. We observed the consequence of such symptoms prospectively over 3 years. METHODS: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs to obtain recorded information from patients who had consulted the GP because of dyspepsia. Mortality and gastrointestinal morbidity per 1000 person years were studied in two cohorts of patients, one presenting with, the other without, alarm symptoms and compared to expected rates from the general population. The incidence of ulcers was compared between the two cohorts. The predictive value of alarm symptoms for the development of cancer and ulcer was calculated. RESULTS: Compared to the general population, dyspeptic patients without alarm symptoms had an insignificant increase in mortality (OR = 1.5 (0.9-2.4)) and a significant increase in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (OR = 2.4 (1.1-7.1)), whereas in patients with alarm symptoms both mortality (OR = 2.3 (1.7-3.2)) and GI cancers (OR = 6.3 (3.6-11.0)) were significantly raised. In dyspeptic patients, the presence of alarm symptoms increased the risk of developing peptic ulcers significantly (OR = 5.3 (3.1-9.1)) and gastrointestinal cancer insignificantly (OR = 1.9 (0.9-4.1)). Positive predictive values for development of cancer and ulcer were 4% and 14%, respectively. During 3 years of observation, patients with alarm symptoms were diagnosed with a malignancy in 4%, ulcers in 11% and minor gastrointestinal diseases in 25% of cases. CONCLUSION: Although the presence of alarm symptoms predicts a bad prognosis, the positive predictive values were low and negative predicted values high, reflecting low incidences of the diseases in the population at risk. The majority of patients who developed cancer or ulcer did not present with alarm symptom(s) at the initial consultation.     

'Alarm Symptoms' in Patients with Dyspepsia: a Three-year Prospective Study from General Practice

Background: Ten percent of patients consulting a general practitioner (GP) because of dyspepsia report one or more alarm symptom(s): anemia, black stools, blood in stools, dysphagia, jaundice, weight loss. We observed the consequence of such symptoms prospectively over 3 years. Methods: Postal questionnaires were sent to GPs to obtain recorded information from patients who had consulted the GP because of dyspepsia. Mortality and gastrointestinal morbidity per 1000 person years were studied in two cohorts of patients, one presenting with, the other without, alarm symptoms and compared to expected rates from the general population. The incidence of ulcers was compared between the two cohorts. The predictive value of alarm symptoms for the development of cancer and ulcer was calculated. Results: Compared to the general population, dyspeptic patients without alarm symptoms had an insignificant increase in mortality (OR = 1.5 (0.9-2.4)) and a significant increase in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (OR = 2.4 (1.1-7.1)), whereas in patients with alarm symptoms both mortality (OR = 2.3 (1.7-3.2)) and GI cancers (OR = 6.3 (3.6-11.0)) were significantly raised. In dyspeptic patients, the presence of alarm symptoms increased the risk of developing peptic ulcers significantly (OR = 5.3 (3.1-9.1)) and gastrointestinal cancer insignificantly (OR = 1.9 (0.9-4.1)). Positive predictive values for development of cancer and ulcer were 4% and 14%, respectively. During 3 years of observation, patients with alarm symptoms were diagnosed with a malignancy in 4%, ulcers in 11% and minor gastrointestinal diseases in 25% of cases. Conclusion: Although the presence of alarm symptoms predicts a bad prognosis, the positive predictive values were low and negative predicted values high, reflecting low incidences of the diseases in the population at risk. The majority of patients who developed cancer or ulcer did not present with alarm symptom(s) at the initial consultation.     

Can clinical features stratify use of endoscopy for dyspeptic patients with high background prevalence of upper gastrointestinal cancer?

BackgroundWhether clinical features can stratify priority of endoscopy remains controversial for dyspeptic patients with high background prevalence of upper gastrointestinal cancer.AimTo examine the predictive performance of clinical features for cancerous lesions in dyspeptic patients in Taiwan.MethodsBetween April 2008 and July 2009, 2530 consecutive dyspeptic outpatients underwent prospective evaluation with standardized questionnaire and then upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Performance of using age thresholds and alarm symptoms to predict malignancy was determined. Independent risk factors associated with malignancy and those with negative endoscopic findings were identified.ResultsMalignant lesions were found in 31 patients (1.2%) and were independently associated with age, male gender, gastrointestinal bleeding, weight loss, and alcohol consumption. Any symptom of weight loss, bleeding and dysphagia, or simply age >45 years predicted 97% of cancer cases, with the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values being 96.8%, 29.3%, 1.7%, and 99.9%, respectively. This strategy achieved a low negative likelihood ratio (0.11) and a high diagnostic odds ratio (12.45). Negative endoscopic finding (n = 1377, 54.4%) was independently associated with younger age, female gender, no use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and no tobacco or alcohol consumption.ConclusionsAbsence of weight loss, dysphagia, and gastrointestinal bleeding predicts low likelihood of malignancy in dyspeptic Taiwanese patients aged <45 years.     

Can anti-Helicobacter pylori and anti-CagA antibodies be used to select patients with dyspepsia for gastroscopy?

BACKGROUND: agA IgG antibody in sera may indicate presence of peptic ulcer disease among dyspeptic patients and therefore may be used as a serological marker to identify high risk patients for peptic ulcer who can be subjected to endoscopy. Present study was performed to identify association of CagA IgG antibody in patients with peptic ulcer. METHODS: Consecutive patients with dyspepsia were subjected to endoscopy and sera was collected from each. Rapid urease test in antral tissue collected from each patient by endoscopic biopsy was performed. Antral tissue was also examined histologically. IgG Antibody against H. Pylori and CagA IgG antibody was tested in each patients sera. RESULTS: Out of 82 patients with dyspepsia included in the study 28 had peptic ulcer. Of whom 26 were positive for anti IgG H. Pylori antibody. More than 80% patients with peptic ulcer patients had detectable anti Cag A antibody in contrast to 33% patients with non ulcer dyspepsia (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anti-Cag A antibody may be used as a screening test in patients with dyspepsia to select high risk patients for peptic ulcer for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.     

Empirical treatment based on "typical" reflux symptoms is inappropriate in a population with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Empirical therapy or early endoscopy have been recommended as acceptable management options for GERD. The objective of this study was to determine whether diagnosis and empirical treatment based on reflux symptoms alone are appropriate as initial management for patients with gastroesophageal reflux. METHOD: Consecutive patients presenting with weekly reflux symptoms were evaluated with a structured questionnaire followed by endoscopy. Patients with dyspepsia as the predominant symptom, "alarm" symptoms (weight loss, dysphagia, or bleeding), history of peptic ulcer or gastric surgery, or recent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs intake were excluded. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty patients were studied: 82 (18%) were found to have peptic ulcer disease and 78 (95%) were infected with Helicobacter pylori. Concomitant erosive esophagitis was found in 26 (32%) of these patients with peptic ulcer disease. In the remaining 378 patients, 218 (58%) had erosive esophagitis and 1 had esophageal cancer. Among the 159 patients with no endoscopic lesion, 148 (93%) had relief of symptoms when treated with a proton pump inhibitor. Multivariate analysis showed that male gender (OR: 1.8, p = 0.03), age greater than 60 years (OR: 2.2, p = 0.01) and H pylori infection (OR: 3.6, p = 0.008) were significantly associated with a diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Coexisting dyspeptic symptom was not a predictor (p = 0.13) for peptic ulcer disease. CONCLUSIONS: In populations with a high prevalence of H pylori infection, a significant proportion of patients with GERD have concomitant peptic ulcer disease. Empirical treatment based on "typical" GERD symptoms alone may not be appropriate.     

Endoscopic evaluation of patients with dyspepsia: results from the national endoscopic data repository

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endoscopy is commonly performed to evaluate symptoms of dyspepsia. The aim of this study was to characterize patients who receive endoscopy for dyspepsia and measure predictors of primary endoscopic outcomes, utilizing a large national endoscopic database. METHODS: The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI) receives endoscopy reports from a network of 74 sites in the United States. Sixty-one percent of reports come from private practice settings. Patients with reflux dyspepsia and nonreflux dyspepsia were identified from January 2000 to June 2002. Patients with dysphagia and known Barrett's esophagus were excluded. Primary endoscopic outcomes included esophageal inflammation and stricture, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, suspected Barrett's esophagus (> or =2 cm), and suspected esophageal and gastric malignancy. The presence or absence of alarm symptoms (vomiting, weight loss, and evidence of GI blood loss) was determined. Adjusted relative risk (RR) for predicting serious outcomes was calculated in a multivariate model. RESULTS: We received 117,497 endoscopic reports, representing 99,558 unique patients. Dyspepsia, with and without reflux symptoms, accounted for 43% of upper endoscopies. Among dyspeptic patients, 36.5% were younger than 50 years of age without alarm symptoms. Esophageal or gastric malignancy in patients with dyspepsia was associated with increasing age, male sex, Asian race, Native American race, and symptoms of weight loss and vomiting. Suspected Barrett's esophagus (> or =2 cm) was associated with reflux symptoms, male sex, age, and white race. Ulcers were associated with evidence of bleeding, vomiting, male sex, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: These practice-based data reveal important practice behaviors and outcomes.     

Serologic detection of CagA positive Helicobacter pylori strains predicts the presence of peptic ulcer in young dyspeptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter Pylori infection has been strongly associated with upper gastrointestinal (GI) disease, especially duodenal ulcer. Endoscopy or contrast radiography is needed to diagnose and appropriately manage peptic ulcer disease. These diagnostic procedures, however, are time consuming and expensive; endoscopy is invasive and contrast radiography cannot help in the diagnosis of H pylori infection. Our aim was to examine in a prospective study the relation between serologic detection of cytotoxic associated gene (CagA) H pylori strains and endoscopic findings among young dyspeptic patients to determine whether this noninvasive test can help differentiate patients with from those without ulcers. METHODS: One hundred patients younger than 45 years with dyspepsia referred for upper GI endoscopy were included in the study. During endoscopy antral biopsy specimens were obtained for the rapid urease test and histologic examination. At histologic examination gastritis was graded from 0 (normal histologic features) to 3 (severe gastritis). After endoscopy blood was obtained for serologic determination of CagA status. RESULTS: Among the 100 patients 56 were H pylori positive and 44 were H pylori negative. In the group of 56 H pylori-positive patients 36 (64.3%) had peptic ulcers and 20 (35.7%) did not. Among patients with peptic ulcer 34 of 36 (94.4%) were CagA positive and 2 (5.6%) were CagA negative. The respective values for the group of patients without ulcers were 9 of 20 (45%) and 11 of 20 (55%). The difference in the proportion of CagA-positive subjects between the group with and that without peptic ulcer was highly significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Among young patients with dyspepsia, CagA seropositivity is highly associated with duodenal ulcer at endoscopy.     

The Helicobacter pylori breath test: a surrogate marker for peptic ulcer disease in dyspeptic patients.

BACKGROUND: There is interest in noninvasive H pylori testing as a means of predicting diagnosis and determining management in dyspeptic patients. AIMS: To assess the value of the 14C urea breath test as a predictor of peptic ulcer disease in patients presenting with dyspepsia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 327 consecutive patients referred for investigation of dyspepsia had a 14C urea breath test performed before endoscopy. Patients were not included if they had previously confirmed ulcer disease, previous gastric surgery, or were taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. RESULTS: Of the 182 patients with a positive 14C urea breath test, duodenal and/or gastric ulcers were present in 45% and erosive duodenitis in a further 2%. Oesophagitis was present in 12% of the breath test positive patients with two thirds of the oesophagitis patients having co-existent ulcer disease. The prevalence of ulcer disease in the H pylori positive dyspeptic patients was independently related to smoking and previous investigation status. If previously uninvestigated, the prevalence of ulcers was 67% in smokers and 46% in non-smokers. If previous upper gastrointestinal investigations were negative, the prevalence of ulcers was 53% in smokers and 28% in non-smokers. Of the 136 patients with a negative breath test, only 5% had peptic ulcers. The most frequent endoscopic finding in these H pylori negative subjects was oesophagitis, being present in 17%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a positive H pylori test is a powerful predictor of the presence of underlying ulcer disease in dyspeptic patients, especially if smokers, and that a negative H pylori test is a powerful predictor of the absence of ulcer disease. It also indicates that a negative upper gastrointestinal investigation does not preclude subsequent presentation with ulcer disease.     

Predictive value of alarm symptoms in patients with Rome Ⅳ dyspepsia:A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND No studies have evaluated the predictive value of alarm symptoms for organic dyspepsia and organic upper gastrointestinal(GI) diseases based on Rome IV criteria in the Chinese population.AIM To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms for dyspeptic patients based on Rome IV criteria.METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of dyspepsia patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria at two academic urban tertiary-care centers from March 2018 to January 2019.Basic demographic data,dyspeptic information,alarm symptoms,lifestyle,examination results,family history and outpatient cost information were collected.Dyspepsia patients with normal findings on upper GI endoscopy,epigastric ultrasound and laboratory examination and without Helicobacter pylori-associated dyspepsia were classified as functional dyspepsia.RESULTS A total of 381 patients were enrolled in the study,including 266 functional dyspepsia patients and 115 organic dyspepsia patients.There were 24 patients with organic upper GI disease among patients with organic dyspepsia.We found that based on the Rome IV criteria,alarm symptoms were of limited value in differentiating organic dyspepsia and organic upper GI diseases from functional dyspepsia.Age(odds ratio(OR) = 1.056,P = 0.012),smoking(OR = 4.714,P = 0.006) and anemia(OR = 88.270,P 0.001) were independent predictors for organic upper GI diseases.For the comparison of epigastric pain syndrome,postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome combined with postprandial distress syndrome,the results showed that there were statistically significant differences in anorexia(P = 0.021) and previous visits(P = 0.012).The Clinical Trials.gov number is NCT 03479528.CONCLUSION Most alarm symptoms had poor predictive value for organic dyspepsia and organic upper GI diseases based on Rome IV criteria.Gastroscopic screening should not be based solely on alarm symptoms.     

Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is an important emergency situation. Population-based epidemiology data are important to get insight in the actual healthcare problem. There are only few recent epidemiological surveys regarding acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Several surveys focusing on peptic ulcer disease showed a significant decrease in admission and mortality of peptic ulcer disease. Several more recent epidemiological surveys show a decrease in incidence of all cause upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding remained stable. Peptic ulcer bleeding is the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, responsible for about 50% of all cases, followed by oesophagitis and erosive disease. Variceal bleeding is the cause of bleeding in cirrhotic patients in 50-60%. Rebleeding in upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurs in 7-16%, despite endoscopic therapy. Rebleeding is especially high in variceal bleeding and peptic ulcer bleeding. Mortality ranges between 3 and 14% and did not change in the past 10 years. Mortality is increasing with increasing age and is significantly higher in patients who are already admitted in hospital for co-morbidity. Risk factors for peptic ulcer bleeding are NSAIDs use and H. pylori infection. In patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding and using NSAIDs, a protective drug was only used in 10%. COX-2 selective inhibitors do cause less gastroduodenal ulcers compared to non-selective NSAIDs, however, more cardiovascular adverse events are reported. H. pylori infection is found in about 50% of peptic ulcer bleeding patients. H. pylori should be tested for in all ulcer patients and eradication should be given.     

6 Role of gastric acid in the aetiology of dyspeptic disease and dyspepsia

The main diseases associated with dyspepsia are peptic ulcer disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-ulcer dyspepsia. Increased gastric acid secretion is a characteristic of most duodenal ulcer patients and of a small minority of non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients. Although acid secretion is normal in most gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients, the condition is mainly the result of excess exposure of the distal oesophagus to acid refluxing from the stomach. Increased mucosal sensitivity to acid is involved in the aetiology of dyspeptic symptoms in the majority of patients with peptic ulcer disease and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and in a minority of non-ulcer dyspepsia subjects. Gastric acid, therefore, plays an important role in both the aetiology of dyspeptic diseases and in the aetiology of dyspeptic symptoms.     

Update on the role of H pylori infection in gastrointestinal disorders.

Infection with Helicobacter pylori is accepted as the primary cause of peptic ulcer disease, and there is evidence to suggest its role in other gastrointestinal disorders. An estimated 20% to 40% of the Canadian population is infected with H pylori; however, clinically relevant disease is present in only approximately 10% to 20% of these individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the diseases for which eradication of H pylori is beneficial to ensure that patients do not receive unnecessary treatment. In patients with ulcers induced by long term treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, preliminary results suggest that eradication of H pylori may reduce the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. Furthermore, a benefit has been observed for the eradication of H pylori before patients commence therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. An association between the presence of H pylori and specific dyspeptic symptoms has yet to be established; however, there may be a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia who benefit from the eradication of H pylori. The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disorder and H pylori infection remains unclear. In Canada, the recommended therapy for the eradication of H pylori is seven days of twice-daily treatment with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole. Although the proton pump inhibitors are treated as a class for use in these regimens, there is suggestion that a faster onset of action may lead to a higher rate of eradication.     

Duodenal ulcer hemorrhage with and without dyspepsia

To clarify the clinical significance of dyspepsia in patients with bleeding duodenal ulcer, we studied 298 patients prospectively. Ages of patients ranged from 16 to 81 yr (mean 45.9). There were 244 (82%) dyspeptic and 54 (18%) nondyspeptic patients. In the dyspeptic group, significantly more patients were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In the nondyspeptic group, there was a higher percentage of patients with duodenal bulb deformity (p less than 0.005), which deformity was related to previous peptic ulcer disease. The age, sex, past history of dyspepsia or bleeding, consumption of alcohol and cigarettes, and the hospital course of the two groups of patients did not differ significantly. Our results show that the clinical course of duodenal ulcer hemorrhage is not significantly different in patients with or without dyspepsia, and indicate that bleeding and dyspepsia probably are two independent presentations in the natural course of the disease. The significance of the correlation between dyspepsia and duodenal bulb deformity is discussed.     

Specifics of Helicobacter pylori infection/NSAID effects in the elderly

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection increases with age worldwide. Unlike in younger patients, the presentation of peptic disease in the elderly population is subtle and atypical, and thus leads to a delay of diagnosis. Due to comorbidities and advanced age, it results in increased complications, morbidity and mortality. Bleeding and perforation are frequent complications and therefore peptic ulcer in adult patients represents a serious disease. The relationship between the infection caused by HP and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in the pathogenesis of peptic ulcer disease is still controversial. However these two factors, independently or in synergy, represent the principal cause of peptic ulcer development in the adult population. In patients diagnosed with peptic ulcer caused by HP, more than half take medications containing aminosalicylic acid. Helicobacter pylori infection in elderly NSAID users is associated with an increased ulcer incidence, but not with an increased prevalence of upper digestive tract bleeding. Helicobacter pylori and NSAID consumption are independent and unrelated risk factors for upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Eradication of HP is recommended before the initiation of a long-term aspirin administration in elderly patients. Low aspirin dosages are associated with a high risk of ulcer bleeding. The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients is significantly higher in the cases of acute abuse of NSAIDs relative to its chronic use. The simultaneous use of NSAID or aspirin and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors--antidepressants, increases the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Peptic ulcer disease in the adult population, if combined with old age, presence of serious and/or life- threatening diseases, as well as repeated ulcer bleedings, shows a high mortality rate.     

消化性溃疡患者非甾体类抗炎药服用史和幽门螺杆菌感染的协同致病性分析

目的了解服用非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)和幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)感染在消化性溃疡及合并上消化道出血发病中是否具有协同作用。方法应用病例对照研究,于1999年7月至2004年12月选取吉林大学中日联谊医院的803例消化性溃疡患者(其中208例溃疡合并上消化道出血者)与同一时期就诊的2061例非胃十二指肠疾病患者,进行NSAIDs服用史的调查和H.pylori感染的检测。结果服用NSAIDs合并H.pylori感染者患胃溃疡的OR值明显高于单纯服用NSAIDs者和单纯H.pylori感染者患胃溃疡的OR值之和;服用NSAIDs合并H.pylori感染的胃溃疡及十二指肠溃疡患者发生上消化道出血的OR值均低于单纯服用NSAIDs和单纯H.pylori感染的胃溃疡患者和十二指肠溃疡患者发生上消化道出血的OR值之和;与无溃疡未服NSAIDs者比较,偶尔服药者溃疡出血与短期服药者及长期服药者比较,差异无统计学意义。结论NSAIDs和H.pylori感染在胃溃疡的形成中具有协同作用;在溃疡合并上消化道出血的发病中无协同作用;溃疡合并上消化道出血与服用NSAIDs的时间长短无关。     

Gastroduodenal ulcer incidence in patients with venous thromboembolism

The presence of peptic ulcer disease implies a high risk of bleeding in patients on heparin therapy. We reviewed our experience with 166 consecutive patients admitted because of venous thromboembolism. Of these 166 patients, 29 were referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in order to detect the presence of any lesion that might contraindicate heparin therapy. A gastric ulcer was found in 10 patients, a duodenal ulcer in 11, and gastric erosions with signs of bleeding in 3 patients. Given the unexpectedly high frequency of ulcer in these patients, an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was routinely performed early in the course of admission in 50 consecutive patients with venous thromboembolism. A gastric ulcer was found in 5 patients (10%), a duodenal ulcer in 7 (14%), and erosions in 2. Five of these patients had an unsuspected ulcer. A case can be made for prophylactic antiulcer therapy for all patients placed on anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is indicated in patients with ulcer symptoms, in those with a previous history of peptic ulcer disease, and perhaps, in patients developing occult blood in the stools while on treatment with anticoagulants.     

Role of symptoms in diagnosis and outcome of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Apart from Japan, where screening programmes have resulted in early diagnosis in asymptomatic patients, in most countries the diagnosis of gastric cancers is invariably made on account on dyspeptic and alarm symptoms, which may also be of prognostic significance when reported by the patient at diagnosis. However, their use as selection criteria for endoscopy seems to be inconsistent since alarm symptoms are not sufficiently sensitive to detect malignancies. In fact, the overall prevalence of these symptoms in dyspeptic patients is high, while the prevalence of gastro-intestinal cancer is very low. Moreover, symptoms of early stage cancer may be indistinguishable from those of benign dyspepsia, while the presence of alarm symptoms may imply an advanced and often inoperable disease. The features of dyspeptic and alarm symptoms may reflect the pathology of the tumour and be of prognostic value in suggesting site, stage and aggressiveness of cancer. Alarm symptoms in gastric cancer are independently related to survival and an increased number, as well as specific alarm symptoms, are closely correlated to the risk of death. Dysphagia, weight loss and a palpable abdominal mass appear to be major independent prognostic factors in gastric cancer, while gastro-intestinal bleeding, vomiting and also duration of symptoms, do not seem to have a relevant prognostic impact on survival in gastric cancer.     

Impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use on the prevalence of dyspepsia and uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin (here collectively called NSAIDs) use is the second most common aetiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease and a major factor for peptic ulcer complications. The role of NSAIDs in the pathogenesis of uncomplicated peptic ulcer is less well understood and the interaction between NSAIDs and Helicobacter pylori infection on ulcer development is controversial. The aim of the present study was to examine the role of NSAIDs in the occurrence and clinical features of uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease. METHODS: A total of 1091 consecutive patients referred for open-access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy by general practitioners (GPs) were enrolled. The use of NSAIDs was gathered from a structured questionnaire completed by the patients and from patient files by GPs. The exclusion criteria were previous H. pylori eradication and gastric surgery, as well as symptoms and/or signs suggestive of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. RESULTS: Of the whole study group (n = 1091), 76 (7%) patients had a peptic ulcer. Thirty patients had an NSAID-use-associated peptic ulcer and 46 patients a non-NSAID-use peptic ulcer. Of patients with chronic gastritis (n = 599), 71% were H. pylori-positive and 108 used NSAIDs. Of those with chronic gastritis, 23 had an NSAID-use-associated peptic ulcer and 38 a non-NSAID ulcer. Of patients with normal gastric histology (n = 492), 75 patients used NSAIDs, 7 had an NSAID ulcer and 8 a non-NSAID ulcer. The only independent risk factor for peptic ulcer in patients using NSAIDs was H. pylori infection (odds ratio (OR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-7.3), whereas dyspepsia (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.4), male sex (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.6-3.4), age (OR 1.0 per decade, 95% CI 0.8-1.3) and anaemia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 0.9-8.7) were not risk factors. In patients not using NSAIDs, independent risk factors for peptic ulcer were dyspepsia (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.1-8.8), male sex (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), age (OR 1.2 per decade, 95% CI 1.0-1.5), anaemia (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.6-14.9) and H. pylori infection (OR 7.5, 95% CI 3.4-16.6). When comparing patients using NSAIDs or not, the OR of patients on NSAIDs for peptic ulcer was 2.7 (95% CI 1.5-5.0) among patients with chronic H. pylori gastritis (n = 424) and 5.3 (95% CI 1.8-15.0) among patients with normal gastric mucosa (n = 492). CONCLUSIONS: The use of NSAIDs increases the risk of peptic ulcer 3- and 5-fold in H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients, respectively. Dyspepsia is a poor predictor of peptic ulcer among patients using NSAIDs, and serologic H. pylori testing and treatment for chronic NSAID users is recommended.     

老年消化性溃疡230例临床与内镜特点探讨

目的：研究老年消化性溃疡的临床特征和内镜特点.方法：分析2009年12月～2010年8月收治的230例老年消化性溃疡患者,并分析这230例老年消化性溃疡患者的临床资料.结果：230例老年消化性溃疡患者中,其中男性患者140例,占60.87%,女性患者90例,占39.13%;有不良嗜好（如吸烟,喝酒）者共60例,其中男性43例,占71.67%,女性17例,占28.33%;将230例患者分为有不良嗜好组和无不良嗜好组两组,其中不良嗜好组幽门梗阻、上消化道出血、巨大溃疡有39例,发生率为65%;无不良嗜好组幽门梗阻、上消化道出血、巨大溃疡有35例,占20.59%,不良嗜好组幽门梗阻、上消化道出血、巨大溃疡发生率明显高于无不良嗜好组.经统计学分析有统计学差异.结论：老年消化性溃疡男性发生率比女性高,消化性溃疡并发症幽门梗阻、上消化道出血、巨大溃疡跟不良嗜好之间有一定的联系.