Effects of lung volume reduction surgery in hamsters with elastase-induced emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to improve respiratory mechanics in selected patients with severe emphysema. This is thought to be due to an improvement in lung elastic recoil. This study was aimed at gaining further understanding about the effects of LVRS on respiratory mechanics and airway function. Control hamsters instilled with saline (Ctrl; n=8) were compared with emphysematous animals that underwent either a sham operation (Sham; n=7) or an LVRS (LVRS; n=7). As expected, there was a significant increase in the static lung volumes in the Sham as compared to the Ctrl group and a significant decrease of these volumes in LVRS as compared to the Sham group. Surprisingly, emphysema was associated with a significant increase and LVRS with a significant decrease in vital capacity. Despite a tendency toward an increase in lung compliance as compared to Sham, indices of maximal expiratory flows tended to decrease with LVRS. As opposed to humans, there was no change in the distribution of airway diameters in Sham compared to Ctrl. These findings appear to be largely explained by the high compliance of the hamster chest wall. This allows for better matching between the emphysematous lung and the chest-wall sizes than in humans.     

Increased effective lung volume following lung volume reduction surgery in emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema has a variable effect on spirometry with improvement linked to increases in lung elastic recoil. The mechanism by which recoil increases following LVRS has not been described completely. This study examines preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function to describe a mechanism for changes in airflow obstruction. DESIGN: Change in pulmonary function following LVRS. Setting : Public teaching hospital in Australia. PATIENTS: Patients with severe emphysema and pulmonary function measurements made before and after LVRS. MEASUREMENTS: Routine pulmonary function testing performed with ventilated lung alveolar volume (VA) derived from the gas transfer measurement used as a proxy for the effective lung volume. RESULTS: Pulmonary function tests from 36 consecutive patients with measurements made at the same laboratory were analyzed. The mean FEV(1) was 29.1% predicted presurgery and increased following LVRS from 0.900 L (SD, 0.427 L) to 1.283 L (SD, 0.511 L; p < 0.0001) and TLC (143% predicted) decreased from 8.19 L (SD, 1.492 L) to 7.07 L (SD, 1.52 L; p < 0.0001; n = 35). The mean VA increased by 0.674 L (SD, 0.733 L) from 4.04 to 4.72 L (p < 0.0001; n = 34). The change in FEV(1) correlated well with the change in VA (r = 0.63). The change in FEV(1) in those patients whose VAs did not increase (n = 7) was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in VA reflects an increase of functional or ventilating lung volume and is associated with an improvement in spirometry following LVRS.     

Radiologic evaluation of emphysema for lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery has created an opportunity for the advanced imaging of emphysema. Patients with CT or perfusion scintigraphy demonstrating an upper- or lower-lobe-predominant pattern of emphysema have better patient outcomes after LVRS than patients with emphysema diffusely or homogeneously distributed throughout the lungs. Some patients with diffuse or homogeneous emphysema may demonstrate improvement in function or dyspnea after surgery, but the magnitude of the improvement seen is less than in patients with heterogeneous emphysema, and the duration of benefit is not known. An ongoing, multicenter National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)/Health Care Financing Association (HCFA) sponsored trial of LVRS aims to determine whether LVRS together with maximal medical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation improves patient outcomes compared with maximal medical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation alone. This study will address the duration of clinical benefit and the cost-effectiveness of LVRS.     

Cardiac morphology in lung volume reduction surgery for endstage emphysema

Lung volume reduction surgery for endstage emphysema produces significant improvements in various pulmonary parameters, but its effects on cardiac morphology and function have not been clearly defined. Ten patients scheduled for lung volume reduction surgery underwent pulmonary function testing, right-heart catheterization, and electron beam computed tomography of the heart. These studies were repeated 12-16 weeks after the procedure. Quantitative assessments of right and left ventricular function and left ventricular muscle mass were obtained. Postoperatively, all patients showed significant improvements in forced expiratory volume at one minute compared to the preoperative value (1.57 +/- 0.24 L versus 1.10 +/- 0.21 L), predicted residual lung volume (115% +/- 15% versus 205% +/- 15%), and 6-minute walk test (318 +/- 17 m versus 267 +/- 24 m). There were no significant differences between postoperative and preoperative right ventricular end-diastolic volumes (167.3 +/- 21.2 mL versus 169.2 +/- 17.3 mL) or left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (112.5 +/- 10.2 mL versus 119.2 +/- 9.7 mL).     

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema on diaphragm dimensions and configuration

Part of the functional benefit provided by lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) may be related to improvement in respiratory muscle function resulting from changes in diaphragm dimension and configuration. To study these changes, we obtained 3D reconstructions of the muscle using spiral computed tomography in 11 patients with severe emphysema before and 3 mo after surgery, and in 11 normal subjects matched for sex, age, height, and weight. Bilateral LVRS was performed by thoracoscopy in eight patients and by sternotomy in three patients. Acquisitions were made in the supine posture at relaxed FRC, midinspiratory capacity, and TLC. On average, LVRS produced a 51 +/- 11% increase in FEV(1) and a 30 +/- 4% decrease in FRC. The total surface area of the diaphragm (A(di)) and of the zone of apposition (A(ap)) at FRC increased by 17 +/- 4% and 43 +/- 8%, respectively, but the surface area of the dome did not change. Compared with the values recorded in the normal subjects, postoperative values of A(di) and A(ap) at FRC were reduced by 11% (p < 0.05) and 24% (p < 0.005), respectively. The curvature of the dome increased at TLC in the left sagittal plane, but was otherwise unaffected by the procedure. We conclude that LVRS substantially increases A(di) and A(ap), but does not significantly improve diaphragm configuration at FRC.     

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema on oxygen cost of breathing

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe pulmonary emphysema have a greatly increased oxygen cost of breathing (O(2) cost), and this is the cause of serious malnutrition, or respiratory cachexia, in such patients. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To clarify the effect of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on respiratory function and the nutritional state of these patients through a reduction in the O(2) cost of the respiratory muscles. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Setting, patients, and interventions: Twenty-three patients who underwent LVRS in Tohoku University Hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Pulmonary function and O(2) cost were measured perioperatively by utilizing a method of continuous dead space. In addition, we calculated the proportion of oxygen consumption (O(2)) of respiratory muscles to total O(2) (%O(2)resp) from the measured energy expenditure and the predicted values. RESULTS: FEV(1) and arterial oxygen pressure increased after surgery while lung volume and dyspnea decreased (p < 0.01), and O(2) cost was also reduced from 0.044 to 0.026 log(mL/min)/(L/min) [p < 0.001]. Moreover, the change in O(2) cost had a strong negative correlation with that of FEV(1) (r = - 0.70, p < 0.001), and a moderate positive correlation with that of the ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). %O(2)resp was 23.1% at rest and 55.5% at maximal ventilation. LVRS reduced %O(2)resp at maximal ventilation to 49.0% (p < 0.05), but %O(2)resp at rest did not decrease after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: LVRS reduces energy expenditure of respiratory muscles especially during exercise by decreasing small airway obstruction and hyperinflated lung volume. This may reverse the malnourished state in end-stage emphysema.     

肺减容术治疗肺气肿机制的研究进展

肺减容术（lung volume reduction surgery，LVRS）治疗重度肺气肿取得显著效果，本文介绍了其作用机制的研究进展，包括肺弹性回缩力增加及膈肌的收缩效能的提高等，为改良手术方式、提高手术疗效、选择合适的患者提供依据。     

Densitometry for assessment of effect of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema.

To explore if change in the extent of emphysema correlated with change in lung function, the effect of resection of emphysematous tissue was studied by computed tomography (CT) densitometry. In addition, the current authors studied how surgery-induced change in emphysema related to lung density in control subjects. In total, 30 patients (14 females; mean+/-sd age 59+/-10 yrs) with severe emphysema before and 3 months after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), 48 patients with moderate emphysema and 76 control subjects were investigated. Lung density (15th percentile point) of both lungs and heterogeneity of lung density between 12 isovolumetric partitions in each lung were calculated from chest CT images. The 15th percentile point and its heterogeneity could distinguish controls from subjects with moderate emphysema with a sensitivity and specificity of >95%. LVRS significantly increased lung density by 5.0+/-10.9 g.L(-1) (n=30). Improvement in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide and in residual volume significantly correlated with an increase in lung density (n=20 and 28, respectively). Change in forced expiratory volume in one second did not correlate with change in lung density. In conclusion, lung density 15th percentile point is a valuable surrogate marker for detection of both the extent of and reduction in emphysema.     

Survival following bilateral staple lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Despite numerous reports of short-term response to lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for treatment of emphysema, to our knowledge, longer-term survival has not been reported. We describe survival following LVRS in a large cohort of 256 patients treated with bilateral staple LVRS (n = 236 video-assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] approaches, n = 20 median sternotomy) by a single group of physicians over a 3 1/2-year period from April 1994 to November 1997. DESIGN: Prospective survival study. Overall survival, survival stratified by preoperative presentation, and acute postoperative response were investigated using Kaplan-Meier methods. The simultaneous effects of preoperative predictors and postoperative response variables on survival were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. SETTING: Community hospital and university medical center. PATIENTS: We studied 256 consecutive patients with severe emphysema treated with LVRS. INTERVENTIONS: Bilateral staple LVRS by VATS. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Overall survival information was known with certainty for 246 of 256 patients as of February 1, 1998. Median follow-up time was 623 days (range, 0 to 1,545 days). Mean FEV1 was 0.635L+/-0.015 L preoperatively and rose to 1.068L+/-0.029 L postoperatively. By standard analysis methods (missing patients censored at the time of last contact), 1-year survival was 85+/-2.3% compared with 83+/-2.4% 1-year survival with "worst case" analytic methods (assuming all missing patients died). Two-year survival averaged 81+/-2.7% by standard analysis vs 76+/-2.9% by worst case evaluation. Survival was significantly better for patients who were younger (< or = 70 years old, p = 0.02) and with higher baseline FEV1 (> 0.5, p < 0.03) and PO2 (> 54, p < 0.001). Patients who had greatest short-term improvement in FEV1 following surgery (> 0.56 L increase) also had significantly better longer-term survival following LVRS. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first longer-term survival analysis of a large series of patients who underwent bilateral staple LVRS for emphysema. Substantial long-term mortality is seen, particularly within identifiable high-risk subgroups. Careful comparison to comparably matched control patients will be needed to definitively assess the benefits and risks of LVRS. This study suggests that prospective, controlled trials may need to stratify patient randomization based on preoperative risk factors to obtain meaningful results.     

Surgical aspects and techniques of lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has become an accepted procedure for palliative treatment of diffuse, nonbullous emphysema. Single or multiple peripheral segmental wedge resections of the most destroyed areas of the lungs are performed with the use of stapling devices, in order to decrease hyperinflation and restore diaphragmatic function. Median sternotomy, videoendoscopy or anterior muscle sparing thoracotomies have been used as surgical approaches. The functional improvement after bilateral resections exceed those after a unilateral approach. LVRS has demonstrated its potential as an alternative to transplantation, and with growing experience, the indications for the procedure have been widened. In selected patients with peripheral lung cancer who have been considered unsuitable for a surgical resection, the combination of both tumour resection and LVRS has successfully been performed. In contrast to LVRS, laser surgery of the emphysematous lung has been abandoned in most institutions.     

Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

Over the past decades, extensive literature has been published regarding surgical therapies for advanced COPD. Lung-volume reduction surgery would be an option for a significantly larger number of patients than classic bullectomy or lung transplantation. Unfortunately, the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by major questions regarding the optimal surgical approach, safety, firm selection criteria, and confirmation of long-term benefits. In fact, the long-term follow-up reported in patients undergoing classical bullectomy should serve to caution against unbridled enthusiasm for the indiscriminate application of LVRS. Those with the worst long-term outcome despite favourable short-term improvements after bullectomy have consistently been those with the lowest pulmonary function and significant emphysema in the remaining lung who appear remarkably similar to those being evaluated for LVRS. With this in mind, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute partnered with the Health Care Finance Administration to establish a multicenter, prospective, randomized study of intensive medical management, including pulmonary rehabilitation versus the same plus bilateral (by MS or VATS), known as the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. The primary objectives are to determine whether LVRS improves survival and exercise capacity. The secondary objectives will examine effects on pulmonary function and HRQL, compare surgical techniques, examine selection criteria for optimal response, identify criteria to determine those who are at prohibitive surgical risk, and examine long-term cost effectiveness. It is hoped that data collected from this novel, multicenter collaboration will place the role of LVRS in a clearer perspective for the physician caring for patients with advanced emphysema.     

Lung function 5 yr after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

Current datum more than 2 yr after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is limited. This prospective study evaluates pre-LVRS baseline and 5-yr results in 26 symptomatic patients (mean age 67 +/- 6 yr) (mean +/- SD) who underwent bilateral, targeted upper lobe stapled LVRS using video-assisted thoracoscopy. Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) was 0.7 +/- 0.2 L (mean +/- SD), 29 +/- 10% predicted. Following LVRS, with none lost to follow-up, mortality due to respiratory failure at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr was 4%, 4%, 19%, 31%, 46%, and 58%, respectively. Increase above baseline for FEV(1) > 200 ml and/or FVC > 400 ml at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr post-LVRS was noted in 73%, 46%, 35%, 27%, and 8% of all patients; decrease in dyspnea grade >/= 1 in 88%, 69%, 46%, 27%, and 15%; and elimination of initial oxygen dependence in 18 patients in 78%, 50%, 33%, 22%, and 0%, respectively. Expiratory airflow improved due to the increase in both lung elastic recoil and small airway intraluminal caliber. Five patients decreased FEV(1) 141 +/- 60 ml/yr and FVC 102 +/- 189 ml/yr over 3.8 +/- 1.2 yr post-LVRS, similar to their pre-LVRS rate of decline. In the 11 patients who survived 5 yr, at 0.5-1.0 yr post-LVRS peak increase in FEV(1) was 438 +/- 366 ml, with a decline of 149 +/- 157 ml the following year and 78 +/- 59 ml/yr over 4.0-4.5 yr. Bilateral LVRS provided palliative clinical and physiological improvement in 9 of 26 patients at 3 yr, 7 at 4 yr, and 2 at 5 yr.     

Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Current data for patients > 2 years after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is limited. This prospective study evaluates pre-LVRS baseline data and provides long-term results in 26 patients. INTERVENTION: Bilateral targeted upper lobe stapled LVRS using video thoracoscopy was performed in 26 symptomatic patients (18 men) aged 67 +/- 6 years (mean +/- SD) with severe and heterogenous distribution of emphysema on lung CT. Lung function studies were measured before and up to 4 years after LVRS unless death intervened. RESULTS: No patients were lost to follow-up. Baseline FEV(1) was 0.7 +/- 0.2 L, 29 +/- 10% predicted; FVC, 2.1 +/- 0.6 L, 58 +/- 14% predicted (mean +/- SD); maximum oxygen consumption, 5.7 +/- 3.8 mL/min/kg (normal, > 18 mL/min/kg); dyspneic class > or = 3 (able to walk < or = 100 yards) and oxygen dependence part- or full-time in 18 patients. Following LVRS, mortality due to respiratory failure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 4%, 19%, 31%, and 46%, respectively. At 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after LVRS, an increase above baseline for FEV(1) > 200 mL and/or FVC > 400 mL was noted in 73%, 46%, 35%, and 27% of patients, respectively; a decrease in dyspnea grade > or = 1 in 88%, 69%, 46%, and 27% of patients, respectively; and elimination of oxygen dependence in 78%, 50%, 33%, and 22% of patients, respectively. The mechanism for expiratory airflow improvement was accounted for by the increase in both lung elastic recoil and small airway intraluminal caliber and reduction in hyperinflation. Only FVC and vital capacity (VC) of all preoperative lung function studies could identify the 9 patients with significant physiologic improvement at > 3 years after LVRS, respectively, from 10 patients who responded < or = 2 years and died within 4 years (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral LVRS provides clinical and physiologic improvement for > 3 years in 9 of 26 patients with emphysema primarily due to both increased lung elastic recoil and small airway caliber and decreased hyperinflation. The 9 patients had VC and FVC greater at baseline (p < 0.01) when compared to 10 short-term responders who died < 4 years after LVRS.     

Short- and long-term functional results after lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has emerged as a surgical therapeutic intervention for advanced emphysema. Designed for the relief of dyspnoea, LVRS has been demonstrated to be efficacious in a subset of carefully selected patients. Short-term improvements in dyspnoea are accompanied by improvements in forced expiratory volume in one second ranging 13-96%. Lung volumes likewise improve, with lessening of trapped gas, residual volume, and total lung capacity. Improvements in functional status and quality-of-life measures parallel the improvements in dyspnoea and lung function. One preliminary study suggests that life expectancy after 3 yrs may be improved following LVRS. Many questions regarding lung volume reduction surgery in terms of operative technique, selection of patients, and outcome remain to be answered. Data are available which begin to address some of these issues. Bilateral procedures have greater short-term improvements than unilateral procedures, but the rate of loss of function following the surgery may also be greater. Stapled resection of lung tissue has been demonstrated to be superior to laser ablation. In a majority of reports, outcome is superior in patients with heterogeneous distribution of their emphysema, and patients with alpha1-proteinase inhibitor deficiency emphysema do less well than patients with smoker's emphysema.     

Bone mineral density improvement after lung volume reduction surgery for severe emphysema

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe emphysema, bone mineral density (BMD) is reduced and the risk of osteoporosis is increased. STUDY OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of lung volume reduction surgery on BMD. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Forty emphysematous patients, all receiving oral steroid therapy, underwent bilateral lung volume reduction surgery. Thirty similar patients, who refused the operation, followed a standard respiratory rehabilitation program. MEASUREMENTS: All subjects were evaluated pretreatment and 12 months posttreatment for respiratory function, nutritional status, and bone-related biochemical parameters. BMD was assessed by dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry. RESULTS: After surgery, we observed significant improvements in respiratory function (FEV1, + 18.8% [p < 0.01]; residual volume [RV], -29.6% [p < 0.001]; diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [Dlco], + 21.6% [p < 0.01]) nutritional parameters (fat-free mass, + 6.0% [p < 0.01]), levels of bone-related hormones (free-testosterone, + 20.5% [p < 0.01]; parathormone, -11.2% [p < 0.01]), bone turnover markers (osteocalcin, -12.7% [p < 0.05]; bone-alkaline-phosphatase, -14.0% [p < 0.05]; beta-crosslaps, -33.6% [p < 0.001]), BMD (lumbar, + 8.8% [p < 0.01]; femoral, + 5.5% [p < 0.01]), and T-score (lumbar, + 21.0% [p < 0.01]; femoral, + 12.4% [p < 0.01]) with reduction in osteoporosis rate (50 to 25%). Nineteen patients who had undergone surgery were able to discontinue treatment with oral steroids. These subjects showed a more significant improvement in BMD (lumbar, + 9.6%; femoral, + 6.8%; p < 0.001) and T-score (lumbar, + 27.3%; femoral, + 14.3%; p < 0.001). The remaining 21 patients who had undergone surgery experienced significant improvement compared to respiratory rehabilitation subjects despite continued therapy with oral steroids (BMD: lumbar, + 4.5% vs -0.7%, respectively [p < 0.01]; femoral, + 2.7% vs -1.1%, respectively [p < 0.05]; T-score: lumbar, + 14 vs -2.1, respectively [p < 0.01]; femoral, + 7.4 vs -2.7, respectively [p < 0.01]). The increase in lumbar BMD was correlated with the surgical reduction of RV (p = 0.02) and with the increase in Dlco (p = 0.01) and fat-free mass (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Lung volume reduction surgery significantly improves BMD compared to respiratory rehabilitation therapy, even in patients requiring oral steroids. The increase in BMD correlates with RV, Dlco, and fat-free mass, suggesting that the restoration of respiratory dynamics, gas exchange, and nutritional status induces improvement in bone metabolism and mineral content.