Interleukin (IL)-5 but not immunoglobulin E reconstitutes airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in IL-4-deficient mice

We studied the role of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E in the development of allergen-induced sensitization, airway inflammation, and airway hy-perresponsiveness (AHR). Normal, IL-4-, and IL-5-deficient C57BL/6 mice were sensitized intraperitoneally to ovalbumin (OVA) and repeatedly challenged with OVA via the airways. After allergen sensitization and airway challenge, normal and IL-5-deficient, but not IL-4-deficient, mice developed increased serum levels of total and antigen-specific IgE levels and increased IL-4 production in the lung tissue compared with nonsensitized control mice. Only normal mice showed significantly increased IL-5 production in the lung tissue and an eosinophilic infiltration of the peribronchial regions of the airways, whereas both IL-4- and IL-5-deficient mice had little or no IL-5 production and no significant eosinophilic airway inflammation. Associated with the inflammatory responses in the lung, only normal mice developed increased airway responsiveness to methacholine after sensitization and airway challenge; in both IL-4- and IL-5-deficient mice, airway responsiveness was similar to that in nonsensitized control mice. Reconstitution of sensitized, IL-4-deficient mice before allergen airway challenge with IL-5, but not with allergen-specific IgE, restored eosinophilic airway inflammation and the development of AHR. These data demonstrate the importance of IL-4 for allergen-driven airway sensitization and that IL-5, but not allergen-specific IgE, is required for development of eosinophilic airway inflammation and AHR after this mode of sensitization and challenge.     

Role of IgE in the development of allergic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness – a murine model

The importance of IgE in airway inflammation and development of AHR in allergen-sensitized mice has been compared and contrasted in different models of sensitization and challenge. Using different modes of sensitization in normal and genetically manipulated mice after anti-IgE treatment, we have been able to distinguish the role of IgE under these different conditions. Striking differences in the three sensitization protocols were delineated in terms of the role of allergen-specific IgE, extent of eosinophilic airway inflammation, and development of AHR (Table 1). The highest levels of IgE and eosinophil infiltration (approximately 20-fold increases) were achieved after systemic sensitization with allergen (plus adjuvant) followed by repeated airway challenge. Passive sensitization with allergen-specific IgE followed by limited airway challenge induced a modest eosinophilic inflammatory response in the airways despite high levels of serum IgE. Exposure to allergen exclusively via the airways also resulted in a modest serum IgE response and a limited eosinophilic inflammatory response (approximately fourfold increases). Under all of these conditions, inhibition of IL-5-mediated eosinophilic airway inflammation was associated with attenuation of AHR. In contrast, the differences in the responses to the different modes of allergen exposure were associated with differences in the requirements for IgE in the development of AHR (Table 1). In the two models associated with mild eosinophil infiltration (passive sensitization and exclusive airway exposure), IgE was required for the development of AHR but did not substantially enhance airway inflammation on its own. However, IgE-allergen interaction was able to enhance T-cell function in vitro and induce T-cell expansion in vivo. In mice systemically sensitized and challenged via the airways, IgE (or IgE-mediated mast-cell activation) was not required for T-cell activation, eosinophilic inflammation and activation in the airways, or development of AHR. This was most clearly seen in B-cell-deficient and mast-cell-deficient, low-IgE-responder mouse strains (B6, B10) and in anti-IgE-treated high-IgEresponder mice (BALB/c). At the same time, we confirmed the importance of IgE in the induction of immediate-type hypersensitivity (mast-cell activation, immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity, passive cutaneous and systemic anaphylaxis). These differences were also highlighted by the means used to detect altered airway function. Passive sensitization and limited airway challenge or exclusive airway exposure to allergen over 10 days elicited changes in airway function that could be detected only in tracheal smooth-muscle preparations exposed to EFS. In contrast, systemic sensitization followed by repeated airway challenge resulted not only in changes in the contractile response to EFS but also in increased responsiveness to inhaled MCh. Thus, these results distinguish not only the differential involvement of IgE and eosinophil numbers but also their contribution to the readouts used to monitor airway function. Based on these studies, we conclude that IgE plays an important role in the development of airway inflammation and AHR under conditions in which limited IL-5-mediated eosinophilic airway infiltration is induced. In conditions where a robust eosinophilic inflammation of the airways is elicited, IgE (and IgE-mediated mast-cell activation) does not appear to be essential for airway inflammation and the development of AHR, detected as increased responsiveness to inhaled MCh. These findings reveal the potential importance of differential targeting in the treatment of allergic diseases with a predominance of IgE-mediated symptoms, e.g., allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis, where anti-IgE may be an effective therapy, compared to those diseases with a predominant inflammatory component, e.g., AHR in atopic bronchial asthma, where anti-inflammatory or anti-IL-5 therapy may be more beneficial.     

Airway eosinophilia is not a requirement for allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness

BACKGROUND: House dust mites (HDMs) are the major source of perennial allergens causing human allergic asthma. Animal models mimicking as closely as possible the allergic features observed in human asthma are therefore interesting tools for studying the immunological and pathophysiological mechanisms involved. Especially the role of eosinophils and allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E in the pathophysiology of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) remains a subject of intense debate. OBJECTIVE: To develop a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness based on the use of purified house dust mite allergen (Der p 1) as clinical relevant allergen. Furthermore, we studied the effects of low dose allergen exposure on the airway eosinophilia and AHR. METHODS: On day 0, C57Bl/6 mice were immunized with purified Der p 1 intraperitoneally. From day 14-20, the mice were exposed daily to a 30-min aerosol of different concentrations of house dust mite extract. RESULTS: Mice, actively immunized with Der p 1 and subsequently exposed to HDM aerosols, developed AHR, eosinophil infiltration of the airways and allergen-specific IgE. Moreover, lowering the concentration of the HDM aerosol also induced AHR and IgE without apparent eosinophil influx into the airways. Der p 1-sensitized mice exposed to PBS produced IgE, but did not show AHR or eosinophil influx. CONCLUSION: This in vivo model of HDM-induced allergic airway changes suggests that AHR is not related to either eosinophil influx or allergen-specific serum IgE, thereby reducing the importance of these factors as essential elements for allergic AHR.     

Syk activation in dendritic cells is essential for airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation

We evaluated the role of Syk, using an inhibitor, on allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation in a system shown to be B cell- and mast cell-independent. Sensitization of BALB/c mice with ovalbumin (OVA) and alum after three consecutive OVA challenges resulted in AHR to inhaled methacholine and airway inflammation. The Syk inhibitor R406 (30 mg/kg, administered orally, twice daily) prevented the development of AHR, increases in eosinophils and lymphocytes and IL-13 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, and goblet cell metaplasia when administered after sensitization and before challenge with OVA. Levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IFN-gamma in BAL fluid and allergen-specific antibody levels in serum were not affected by treatment. Because many of these responses may be influenced by dendritic cell function, we investigated the effect of R406 on bone marrow-derived dendritic cell (BMDC) function. Co-culture of BMDC with immune complexes of OVA and IgG anti-OVA together with OVA-sensitized spleen mononuclear cells resulted in increases in IL-13 production. IL-13 production was inhibited if the BMDCs were pretreated with the Syk inhibitor. Intratracheal transfer of immune complex-pulsed BMDCs (but not nonpulsed BMDCs) to naive mice before airway allergen challenge induced the development of AHR and increases in BAL eosinophils and lymphocytes. All of these responses were inhibited if the transferred BMDCs were pretreated with R406. These results demonstrate that Syk inhibition prevents allergen-induced AHR and airway inflammation after systemic sensitization and challenge, at least in part through alteration of DC function.     

Diesel exhaust particles exert acute effects on airway inflammation and function in murine allergen provocation models

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies show that sudden surges in ambient particulate matter (PM) levels can trigger acute asthma exacerbations. Although diesel exhaust particles (DEPs) act as an adjuvant for allergic sensitization, this is a delayed response and does not explain acute PM effects on airway hyperreactivity (AHR). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the acute effects of DEPs on AHR using a mouse model. METHODS: Three protocols were developed, 2 of which require OVA sensitization, whereas the third was OVA independent. In the mild sensitization protocol BALB/c mice receive intraperitoneal OVA without alum and are then challenged with aerosolized OVA with or without DEPs. In the postchallenge model DEPs are delivered after OVA challenge to animals sensitized by intraperitoneal OVA plus alum. In the third protocol nebulizer DEPs were also delivered to IL-5-overexpressing mice that exhibit constitutive airway inflammation. Animals were subjected to whole-body plethysmography (WBP) and then killed for performance of bronchoalveolar lavage, histology, and serology. RESULTS: DEP delivery concomitant with OVA challenge or after the induction of airway inflammation with this allergen induced increased AHR in models 1 and 2, respectively. Although these animals showed DEP-induced inflammation and mucus production in the intermediary airways, there was no effect on OVA-specific IgE or T(H)2 cytokine production. In the IL-5 transgenic mice it was possible to induce similar effects with DEPs in the absence of an allergen. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that DEPs induced AHR independent of their adjuvant effects, suggesting the use of these models to study the mechanism or mechanisms of acute asthma exacerbation by means of PM.     

Suppression of allergic airway inflammation and IgE responses by a class I restricted allergen peptide vaccine

CD8 T cells are known to deviate CD4 T-cell responses from Th2 toward Th1. Reduction of Th2 cytokines and increased interferon-γ ameliorates allergic airway disease. We have developed a novel approach to the suppression of allergic airway inflammation, by designing a MHC class I-restricted allergen peptide vaccine, which induces potent and long-lived CD8 T-cell responses. Vaccination of C57BL/6 mice before allergen sensitization completely prevented allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody responses. Vaccination after sensitization failed to suppress IgE, but inhibited accumulation of eosinophils and neutrophils in airways after subsequent allergen challenge. Vaccination suppressed Th2 airway infiltration and enhanced the lung Th1 response without inducing excessive CD8 cellular infiltration or interleukin-17, and the combination of class I peptide with adjuvant was more effective than adjuvant alone. Airway hyperreactivity was prevented by vaccination in an allergen-specific fashion. Class I peptide vaccines might therefore represent a robust and long-lasting immunotherapeutic strategy in allergic disease.     

Divergent effects of biolistic gene transfer in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation

Particle-mediated epidermal delivery (PMED) of allergen genes efficiently prevents systemic sensitization and suppresses specific immunoglobulin E synthesis. We investigated in a mouse model of allergic airway disease the effect of PMED on the elicitation of local inflammatory reactions in the lung. BALB/c mice were biolistically transfected with plasmids encoding beta-galactosidase (betaGal) as model allergen under control of the DC-targeting fascin promoter and the ubiquitously active cytomegalovirus promoter, respectively. Mice were challenged intranasally with betaGal-protein with or without intermediate sensitization with betaGal adsorbed to aluminiumhydroxide. Subsequently, local cytokine production and recruitment of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) effector T cells into the airways were determined, and inflammatory parameters such as cellular infiltration in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) were measured. PMED of betaGal-encoding plasmids before sensitization significantly reduced frequencies of eosinophils in the BAL and shifted the local T helper (Th) cell response from a distinct Th2 response toward a Th1-biased response. However, AHR triggered by allergen challenge via the airways was not alleviated in vaccinated mice. Most important, we show that PMED using betaGal-encoding DNA without subsequent sensitization recruited Tc1 cells into the lung and caused a Th1-prone local immune response after subsequent intranasal provocation, accompanied by neutrophilic infiltration into the airways and elicitation of AHR. We conclude that robust Th1/Tc1 immune responses, although highly effective in the counter-regulation of local Th2-mediated pathology, might as well trigger local inflammatory reactions in the lung and provoke the induction of AHR in the mouse model of allergic airway disease.     

Induction, distribution and modulation of upper airway allergic inflammation in mice

BACKGROUND: To further elucidate mechanisms of human allergic rhinosinusitis, we studied the induction, distribution and modulation of allergen-induced upper airway inflammation in a BALB/c mouse model. METHODS: Allergic inflammation induced with ovalbumin (OVA) by intraperitoneal (IP) injection in alum was compared to repeated intranasal instillation. The type and distribution of inflammatory cells was compared in the respiratory and olfactory epithelial compartments. Eosinophil distribution was assessed using Scarlet Red stain and a polyclonal antibody recognizing eosinophil major basic protein (MBP). The role of interleukin (IL)-5 in upper airway inflammation was tested by administration of polyclonal anti-IL-5 antibody during the sensitization protocol. RESULTS: Unsensitized control mice receiving saline failed to develop upper airway eosinophil infiltration. IP OVA-sensitized mice developed marked upper airway mucosal eosinophil infiltration after aerosol OVA challenge, whereas repeated intranasal instillation of OVA produced qualitatively similar, but less intense eosinophil infiltration. Using either sensitization protocol, eosinophil infiltration was seen in areas of the lower portion of the nasal septum, the floor and the lower lateral walls of the mid-caudal region of the nasal cavity. Immunofluorescence staining for MBP confirmed this distribution of eosinophils but also demonstrated some eosinophils in the maxillary sinuses and in circumscribed regions of the ethmoturbinates. All areas of eosinophil infiltration were lined by respiratory epithelium. The selective infiltration of respiratory but not olfactory epithelium by eosinophils was unassociated with a measurable induction of epithelial ICAM-1 or eotaxin expression. OVA-induced upper airway eosinophil infiltration was found to be IL-5 dependent, since administration of a polyclonal anti-IL-5 antibody (TRFK-5) during OVA sensitization resulted in a marked modulation (80% decrease) in eosinophil infiltration in response to subsequent OVA challenge. CONCLUSION: The mouse upper airway, specifically in areas containing respiratory epithelium, is a target for OVA-induced allergic inflammation. This selective infiltration of respiratory, but not olfactory, epithelium is, in part, dependent upon IL-5. This model is useful for further dissection of the inflammatory response with genetic manipulations and targeted immunological approaches.     

Respiratory syncytial virus infection prolongs methacholine-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in ovalbumin-sensitized mice

Severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-induced disease is associated with childhood asthma and atopy. We combined models of allergen sensitization and RSV infection to begin exploring the immunologic interactions between allergic and virus-induced airway inflammation and its impact on airway hypersensitivity. Airway resistance was measured after methacholine challenge in tracheally intubated mice by whole body plethysmography. Lung inflammation was assessed by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and histopathology. RSV infection alone did not cause significant airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to methacholine. Ovalbumin (OVA)-induced AHR lasted only a few days past the discontinuance of OVA aerosol in mice that were ovalbumin sensitized and mock infected. In contrast, OVA-sensitized mice infected with RSV during the OVA aerosol treatments (OVA/RSV) had AHR for more than 2 weeks after infection. However, 2 weeks after either RSV or mock infection, OVA/RSV mice had significantly more lymphocytes found during BAL than OVA mice, whereas the OVA and OVA/RSV groups had the same number of eosinophils. Histopathologic analysis confirmed an increased inflammation in the lungs of OVA/RSV mice compared with OVA mice. In addition, OVA/RSV mice had a more widespread distribution of mucus in their airways with increased amounts of intraluminal mucus pools compared with the other groups. Thus, prolonged AHR in RSV-infected mice during ovalbumin-sensitization correlates with increased numbers of lymphocytes in BAL fluid, increased lung inflammation, and mucus deposition in the airways, but not with airway eosinophilia. A further understanding of the immunologic consequences of combined allergic and virus-induced airway inflammation will impact the management of diseases associated with airway hyperreactivity. J. Med. Virol. 57:186–192, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Immunostimulatory DNA inhibits transforming growth factor-beta expression and airway remodeling

Immunostimulatory sequences of DNA (ISS) inhibit eosinophilic airway inflammation, Th2 responses, and airway hyperreactivity (AHR) in mouse models of acute ovalbumin (OVA)-induced airway inflammation. To determine whether ISS inhibits airway remodeling, we developed a mouse model of airway remodeling in which OVA-sensitized mice were repeatedly exposed to intranasal OVA administration for 1-6 mo. Mice chronically exposed to OVA developed sustained eosinophilic airway inflammation and sustained AHR to methacholine compared with control mice. In addition, the mice chronically exposed to OVA developed features of airway remodeling, including thickening of the peribronchial smooth muscle layer, peribronchial myofibroblast accumulation, expression of the profibrotic growth factor transforming growth factor-beta, and subepithelial collagen deposition (assessed by quantitation of the area of peribronchial trichrome staining using image analysis, and immunostaining with anti-collagen V antibodies). Administration of ISS systemically every other week significantly inhibited the development of AHR, eosinophilic inflammation, airway mucus production, and importantly, airway remodeling in mice chronically exposed to OVA for 3-6 mo. In addition, ISS significantly reduced bronchoalveolar lavage and lung levels of the profibrotic cytokine transforming growth factor-beta. These studies demonstrate that ISS prevents not only Th2-mediated airway inflammation in response to acute allergen challenge, but also airway remodeling associated with chronic allergen challenge.     

Early interleukin 4-dependent response can induce airway hyperreactivity before development of airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma

In experimental models of bronchial asthma with mice, airway inflammation and increase in airway hyperreactivity (AHR) are induced by a combination of systemic sensitization and airway challenge with allergens. In this report, we present another possibility: that systemic antigen-specific sensitization alone can induce AHR before the development of inflammation in the airway. Male BALB/c mice were sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) by a combination of intraperitoneal injection and aerosol inhalation, and various parameters for airway inflammation and hyperreactivity were sequentially analyzed. Bronchial response measured by a noninvasive method (enhanced pause) and the eosinophil count and interleukin (IL)-5 concentration in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) gradually increased following the sensitization, and significant increase was achieved after repeated OVA aerosol inhalation along with development of histologic changes of the airway. In contrast, AHR was already significantly increased by systemic sensitization alone, although airway inflammation hardly developed at that time point. BALF IL-4 concentration and the expression of IL-4 mRNA in the lung reached maximal values after the systemic sensitization, then subsequently decreased. Treatment of mice with anti-IL-4 neutralizing antibody during systemic sensitization significantly suppressed this early increase in AHR. In addition, IL-4 gene-targeted mice did not reveal this early increase in AHR by systemic sensitization. These results suggest that an immune response in the lung in an early stage of sensitization can induce airway hyperreactivity before development of an eosinophilic airway inflammation in BALB/c mice and that IL-4 plays an essential role in this process. If this early increase in AHR does occur in sensitized human infants, it could be another therapeutic target for early prevention of the future onset of asthma.     

Intranasal delivery of whole influenza vaccine prevents subsequent allergen-induced sensitization and airway hyper-reactivity in mice

BACKGROUND: Infection with influenza virus has been associated with seemingly opposing effects on the development of asthma. However, there are no data about the effects of mucosal vaccination with inactivated influenza on the inception of allergic asthma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the immunological effects of inhaled inactivated influenza vaccine, using two different types of flu vaccines, on the inception of allergic sensitization and allergen-mediated airway disease in a mouse model. METHODS: BALB/c mice were intranasally or intratracheally vaccinated with whole or split influenza virus vaccine (days -1 or -1, 27) before systemic sensitization with ovalbumin (OVA) (days 1, 14) and repeated airway allergen challenges (days 28-30). Allergen sensitization (IgE serum levels), airway inflammation (differential cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) and airway hyper-reactivity (AHR) (in vivo lung function) were analysed. RESULTS: The intranasal instillation of whole influenza vaccine before allergen sensitization significantly reduced the serum levels of total and OVA-specific IgE as well as allergen-induced AHR. Prevention was due to an allergen-specific shift from a predominant T helper (Th)2- towards a Th1-immune response. Application of split influenza vaccine did not show the same preventive effect. CONCLUSION: Intranasal administration of inactivated whole influenza vaccine reduced subsequent allergen sensitization and prevented allergen-induced AHR. Our results show that the composition of the influenza vaccine has a major influence on subsequent development of allergen-induced sensitization and AHR, and suggest that mucosal inactivated whole influenza vaccination may represent a step towards the development of a preventive strategy for atopic asthma.     

Requirement for chemokine receptor 5 in the development of allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation

Chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 is expressed on dendritic cells, macrophages, CD8 cells, memory CD4 T cells, and stromal cells, and is frequently used as a marker of T helper type 1 cells. Interventions that abrogate CCR5 or interfere with its ligand binding have been shown to alter T helper type 2-induced inflammatory responses. The role of CCR5 on allergic airway responses is not defined. CCR5-deficient (CCR5(-/-)) and wild-type (CCR5(+/+)) mice were sensitized and challenged with ovalbumin (OVA) and allergic airway responses were monitored 48 hours after the last OVA challenge. Cytokine levels in lung cell culture supernatants were also assessed. CCR5(-/-) mice showed significantly lower airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and lower numbers of total cells, eosinophils, and lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid compared with CCR5(+/+) mice after sensitization and challenge. The levels of IL-4 and IL-13 in BAL fluid of CCR5(-/-) mice were lower than in CCR5(+/+) mice. Decreased numbers of lung T cells were also detected in CCR5(-/-) mice after sensitization and challenge. Transfer of OVA-sensitized T cells from CCR5(+/+), but not transfer of CCR5(-/-) cells, into CCR5(-/-) mice restored AHR and numbers of eosinophils in BAL fluid after OVA challenge. Accordingly, the numbers of airway-infiltrating donor T cells were significantly higher in the recipients of CCR5(+/+) T cells. Taken together, these data suggest that CCR5 plays a pivotal role in allergen-induced AHR and airway inflammation, and that CCR5 expression on T cells is essential to the accumulation of these cells in the airways.     

Airway hyperresponsiveness in the absence of CD4+ T cells after primary but not secondary challenge

CD4+ T cells have been shown to play a role in the development of airway hyperresponsivness (AHR) and airway eosinophilia in mice using ablation as well as adoptive transfer experiments. However, as other T cell subsets (CD8, NKT) may play a role in these models, we examined the responses of sensitized CD4-deficient mice after either primary or secondary airway allergen challenge. After sensitization, CD4-deficiency in mice was not associated with airway eosinophilia, allergen-specific IgE, or elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-4 or IL-13. Increases in lung CD8 T cells and IL-5 were observed and shown to be essential for AHR as demonstrated after CD8 T cell depletion or anti-IL-5 treatment. In contrast to the response of sensitized CD4-deficient mice to primary allergen challenge, they failed to develop AHR after secondary allergen challenge. Although the importance of this CD4+ T cell-independent pathway in normal mice is unclear at this time, these studies identify the diversity of the cellular pathway, which may contribute to the development of AHR after primary allergen exposure of sensitized mice.     

Estrogen determines sex differences in airway responsiveness after allergen exposure

The female hormone estrogen is an important factor in the regulation of airway function and inflammation, and sex differences in the prevalence of asthma are well described. Using an animal model, we determined how sex differences may underlie the development of altered airway function in response to allergen exposure. We compared sex differences in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) after allergen exposure exclusively via the airways. Ovalbumin (OVA) was administered by nebulization on 10 consecutive days in BALB/c mice. After methacholine challenge, significant AHR developed in male mice but not in female mice. Ovariectomized female mice showed significant AHR after 10-day OVA inhalation. ICI182,780, an estrogen antagonist, similarly enhanced airway responsiveness even when administered 1 hour before assay. In contrast, 17beta-estradiol dose-dependently suppressed AHR in male mice. In all cases, airway responsiveness was inhibited by the administration of a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. These results demonstrate that sex differences in 10-day OVA-induced AHR are due to endogenous estrogen, which negatively regulates airway responsiveness in female mice. Cumulatively, the results suggest that endogenous estrogen may regulate the neurokinin 1-dependent prejunctional activation of airway smooth muscle in allergen-exposed mice.     

Exposure to endotoxin and allergen in early life and its effect on allergen sensitization in mice

BACKGROUND: Exposure to endotoxins, allergens, or both in early life might regulate the development of tolerance to allergens later in life. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether continuous exposure of infant mice to aerosolized endotoxin, allergen, or both inhibits subsequent allergen-induced immune and inflammatory responses. METHODS: Infant BALB/c mice were pre-exposed to aerosolized endotoxin, ovalbumin (OVA), or both (3 times a week for the first 4 weeks of life) before systemic sensitization (days 1-14) and repeated airway challenge (days 28-30) with OVA. RESULTS: Compared with that seen in negative control animals, systemic sensitization and airway allergen challenges induced high serum levels of allergen-specific IgE (0.7 +/- 0.09 vs 0.02 +/- 0.01 OD units), predominant T(H)2-type cytokine production (IL-5 by splenic mononuclear cells in vitro, 1.2 +/- 0.2 vs 0.04 +/- 0.06 ng/mL), airway inflammation (bronchoalveolar lavage fluid leukocytes, 125 +/- 15 vs 64 +/- 7/microL; eosinophils, 28 +/- 5 vs 1 +/- 0/microL) and development of in vivo airway hyperreactivity (maximal enhanced pause, 11 +/- 1.9 vs 4 +/- 0.2). Pre-exposure with LPS before sensitization increased production of specific IgG2a (67 +/- 10 vs 32 +/- 5 U/mL) but failed to prevent T(H)2-mediated immune responses. Pre-exposure with OVA or with OVA plus LPS completely suppressed allergen sensitization, airway inflammation, and development of in vivo airway hyperreactivity; values were similar to those of negative control animals. Inhibition was due to allergen-specific T-cell anergy indicated by omitted allergen-specific T(H)2 and T(H)1 immune responses. In addition, combined exposure to endotoxin and allergen induced a general shift toward an unspecific T(H)1 immune response. CONCLUSION: Exposure with endotoxins before allergen sensitization is not able to induce unresponsiveness but might decrease the susceptibility for sensitization to a variety of common allergens.     

Oral administration of desloratadine prior to sensitization prevents allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyper-reactivity in mice

BACKGROUND: Histamine-1-receptor (H1R)-antagonists were shown to influence various immunological functions on different cell types and may thus be employed for immune-modulating strategies for the prevention of primary immune responses. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an H1R-antagonist on allergen-induced sensitization, airway inflammation (AI) and airway hyper-reactivity (AHR) in a murine model. METHODS: BALB/c mice were systemically sensitized with ovalbumin (OVA) (six times, days 1-14) and challenged with aerosolized allergen (days 28-30). One day prior to the first and 2 h prior to every following sensitization, mice received either 1 or 0.01 microg of desloratadine (DL) or placebo per os. RESULTS: Sensitization with OVA significantly increased specific and total IgE and IgG1 serum levels, as well as in vitro IL-5 and IL-4 production by spleen and peribronchial lymph node (PBLN) cells. Sensitized and challenged mice showed a marked eosinophilic infiltration in broncho-alveolar lavage fluids and lung tissues, and developed in vivo AHR to inhaled methacholine. Oral treatment with DL prior to OVA sensitization significantly decreased production of OVA-specific IgG1, as well as in vitro Th2-cytokine production by spleen and PBLN cells, compared with OVA-sensitized mice. Moreover, eosinophilic inflammation and development of in vivo AHR were significantly reduced in DL-treated mice, compared with sensitized controls. CONCLUSION: Treatment with H1R-anatagonist prior to and during sensitization suppressed allergen-induced Th2 responses, as well as development of eosinophilic AI and AHR. This underscores an important immune modulating function of histamine, and implies a potential role of H1R-anatagonists in preventive strategies against allergic diseases.     

Loss of classical transient receptor potential 6 channel reduces allergic airway response

Background Non-selective cation influx through canonical transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs) is thought to be an important event leading to airway inflammation. TRPC6 is highly expressed in the lung, but its role in allergic processes is still poorly understood.
Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of TRPC6 in airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and allergic inflammation of the lung.
Methods Methacholine-induced AHR was assessed by head-out body plethysmography of wild type (WT) and TRPC6^−/− mice. Experimental airway inflammation was induced by intraperitoneal ovalbumin (OVA) sensitization, followed by OVA aerosol challenges. Allergic inflammation and mucus production were analysed 24 h after the last allergen challenge.
Results Methacholine-induced AHR and agonist-induced contractility of tracheal rings were increased in TRPC6^−/− mice compared with WT mice, most probably due to compensatory up-regulation of TRPC3 in airway smooth muscle cells. Most interestingly, when compared with WT mice, TRPC6^−/− mice exhibited reduced allergic responses after allergen challenge as evidenced by a decrease in airway eosinophilia and blood IgE levels, as well as decreased levels of T-helper type 2 (Th2) cytokines (IL-5, IL-13) in the bronchoalveolar lavage. However, lung mucus production after allergen challenge was not altered by TRPC6 deficiency.
Conclusions TRPC6 deficiency inhibits specific allergic immune responses, pointing to an important immunological function of this cation channel in Th2 cells, eosinophils, mast cells and B cells.     

Airway subepithelial fibrosis in a murine model of atopic asthma: suppression by dexamethasone or anti-interleukin-5 antibody

Fibrosis in the reticular layer beneath the epithelial basement membrane is a feature of airway remodeling in human asthma. We previously reported the presence of subepithelial fibrosis (SEF) in a disease model of atopic asthma in which mice were sensitized and intratracheally challenged with ovalbumin (OVA) (Blyth and colleagues, Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 1996;14:425-438). Here, we describe further studies to quantify the degree of SEF after its induction by repeated exposure of the airways to allergen. The amount of subepithelial reticulin in the airways of animals challenged three times with 80 microg OVA was typically increased 1. 4-fold. The increased amount of reticulin showed no reduction after a 50-d period after the third allergen challenge. A reduction in SEF was achieved by daily treatment with dexamethasone (DEX) for 8 d during the allergen challenge period, or by treatment with anti-interleukin-5 antibody (TRFK5) at the time of allergen challenge. Postchallenge treatment with DEX for 15 d resulted in significant resolution of previously established SEF. Severe nonallergic inflammation during repeated exposure of airways to lipopolysaccharide did not induce SEF. The results indicate that development of SEF is associated with eosinophil infiltration into airways, and may occur only when the inflammatory stimulus is allergic in nature.     

Blocking the leukotriene B4 receptor 1 inhibits late-phase airway responses in established disease

Most of the studies investigating the effectiveness of blocking the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) receptor 1 (BLT1) have been performed in models of primary or acute allergen challenge. The role of the LTB4-BLT1 pathway in secondary challenge models, where airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation have been established, has not been defined. We investigated the effects of blocking BLT1 on early- and late-phase development of AHR and airway inflammation in previously sensitized and challenged mice. Female BALB/c mice were sensitized (Days 1 and 14) and challenged (primary, Days 28-30) with ovalbumin. On Day 72, mice were challenged (secondary) with a single OVA aerosol, and the early and late phases of AHR and inflammation were determined. Specific blockade of BLT1 was attained by oral administration of a BLT1 antagonist on Days 70 through 72. Administration of the antagonist inhibited the secondary ovalbumin challenge-induced alterations in airway responses during the late phase but not during the early phase, as demonstrated by decreases in AHR and in bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophilia and eosinophilia 6 and 48 hours after secondary challenge. The latter was associated with decreased levels of KC protein, macrophage inflammatory protein 2, and IL-17 in the airways. These data identify the importance of the LTB4-BLT1 pathway in the development of late-phase, allergen-induced airway responsiveness after secondary airway challenge in mice with established airway disease.