Analysis of prostate-specific antigen bounce after I permanent seed implant for localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To report on the incidence of benign prostate-specific antigen bounce following permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy, to describe the associations in our population and review the relationship of bounce to subsequent biochemical failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2000 to May 2005, 374 patients with localised prostate cancer were treated with I(125) permanent prostate brachytherapy at a single institution. A prospectively collected database was used to identify cases of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce, defined as a rise of 0.2 ng/ml above an initial PSA nadir with subsequent decline to or below that nadir without treatment. The patients who received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant hormone manipulation were excluded. Biochemical failure was determined using the both the ASTRO consensus definition and Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) definition. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were identified with a median follow-up of 45 months (24-85). PSA bounce was noted in 79 (37%) men, occurring at a median of 14.8 months (1.7-40.6) following implant. The median peak PSA was 1.8 ng/ml (0.4-7.4) with a bounce magnitude of 0.91 ng/ml (0.2-5.8). When pre- and post-implant factors were assessed for association to bounce, only younger age was statistically significant (p=0.002). The threshold for biochemical failure as defined by the ASTRO consensus definition (1997) was met in 4 (5%) patients after experiencing bounce as opposed to 19 (15%) non-bounce patients (p=0.01). The threshold for Phoenix (nadir +2 ng/mL) was met in 6 (7.5%) patients following bounce versus 22 (17%) of non-bounce patients (p=0.003). Both definitions are prone to false positive calls during bounce. Median PSA velocity during the bounce was 0.08 ng/mL/month (0.02-0.98) and was statistically significantly lower than the median velocity prior to the Phoenix biochemical failure at 0.28 ng/mL/month (0.07-2.04) (p=0.0005). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common finding in our population and is associated with a lower rate of subsequent biochemical failure. The noted differences in PSA velocity will require verification in a future analysis to reduce the influence of median follow-up on this finding. Patients should be advised of the potential of bounce in PSA follow-up after permanent I(125) prostate brachytherapy and physicians involved in follow-up of prostate brachytherapy patients should be aware of this phenomenon, allowing them to commit to appropriate PSA surveillance, avoiding the premature and inappropriate initiation of salvage therapy during PSA bounce.     

Using the magnitude of PSA bounce after MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy to distinguish recurrence,benign precipitating factors,and idiopathic bounce

PURPOSE: To identify events that precipitated a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and characterize the magnitude, duration, and time to PSA bounce after MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2001, 186 patients with low-risk prostate cancer underwent MRI-guided permanent 125I source implantation, with or without external beam radiotherapy. A PSA bounce was defined as a >or=15% elevation in PSA compared with the most recent value, followed by a decline to a level at or less than the prebounce value. At the time of PSA measurement, data were prospectively collected on whether the patient had recent ejaculation, ongoing radiation proctitis, or recent instrumentation. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients (61.8%) had a total of 156 PSA bounces. Of these, 36 patients had PSA bounces associated with ejaculation, proctitis, or instrumentation, and 79 experienced idiopathic PSA bounces (not associated with a precipitating event). The magnitude of the PSA bounce was significantly lower for the idiopathic PSA bounce (0.6 ng/mL) compared with that associated with ejaculation (p = 0.003), proctitis (p <0.0001), or instrumentation (p = 0.007). Patients with biopsy-proven local recurrence had a median PSA elevation of 1.2 ng/mL, significantly higher (p = 0.006) than the magnitude of the idiopathic PSA bounce, but not significantly different from the magnitude of the PSA bounce due to ejaculation, proctitis, or instrumentation. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with MRI-guided prostate brachytherapy, recent ejaculation, instrumentation, or ongoing radiation proctitis can cause a transient increase in PSA, the magnitude of which is significantly higher than that for idiopathic PSA bounce, but is similar to that in patients with recurrent disease.     

PSA kinetics following I-125 radioactive seed implantation in the treatment of T1-T2 prostate cancer

Although there is renewed interest in prostate brachytherapy, little information is available on the effect of the procedure on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes over time. This study describes PSA kinetics after iodine-125 (I-125) transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal implantation of the prostate. From February 1991-September 1997, 207 patients were treated with an I-125 prostate implant alone for T1-T2 prostate cancer. PSA values were obtained prior to treatment and at 1-73 months (median, 24 months). The change in PSA after implantation of the prostate was measured as a fraction of the pretreatment PSA (PSA at follow-up/pretreatment PSA). PSA failure was defined as two elevations in PSA or PSA > 1 ng/ml. One hundred fifty-five patients had PSA values recorded at the 1-month time period. A PSA value greater than the pretreatment PSA at 1 month was found in 27% (42/155). This had no significant effect on future PSA failure. The median percentage change in PSA after implantation for all patients were as follows: 1 month, 0.73; 3 months, 0.30; 6 months, 0.18; 12 months, 0.12; 18 months, 0.12; 24 months, 0.08; 30 months, 0.07; 36 months, 0.08; 42 months, 0.08; and 48 months, 0.05. The most significant decline occurred in the first 12 months. This was followed by a more gradual decline between 12-24 months. There was little change in PSA values after 24 months. The 1-year PSA value had a significant effect on PSA failure. Patients with a 1-year PSA <1 ng/ml (66) had an actuarial 4-year freedom-from-failure rate of 90%, compared to a rate of 62% for those with values >1 ng/ml (69) (P = 0.002). Twenty-seven patients developed PSA failure. The time to PSA failure ranged from 12-48 months (median, 24 months), but most (20/27) failures occurred after 18 months. We conclude that the greatest decline in PSA after I-125 implantation of the prostate occurs during the first year, and little change occurs after 2 years. A 1-year PSA value > 1 ng/ml is highly predictive of eventual PSA failure, which occurs in most patients after 18 months posttreatment.     

Prostate-specific antigen bounce after prostate seed implantation for localized prostate cancer: descriptions and implications

PURPOSE: To calculate the actuarial risk of developing a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after prostate brachytherapy alone, using three definitions of bounce mentioned in the literature, and to explore the relationship between disease and treatment variables and the risk of developing a bounce. The impact of PSA bounce on PSA failure was also explored. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 373 patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer underwent radioactive seed implant using 125I (n = 337) or 103Pd (n = 36) without hormonal therapy or external beam RT. All patients had a minimum of 1 year (median 4, maximum 11) of follow-up and at least three follow-up PSA values. PSA bounce was defined by a rise of one or two PSA values with a subsequent fall. Three definitions of bounce were used: definition 1, rise > or = 0.1 ng/mL; definition 2, rise > or = 0.4 ng/mL; and definition 3, rise >35% of previous value. RESULTS: The actuarial likelihood of experiencing a PSA bounce at 5 years was 31% for definition 1, 17% for definition 2, and 20% for definition 3. The median time to develop a bounce was 19.5 months for definitions 1 and 2 and 20.5 months for definition 3. Gleason score, initial PSA level, and clinical stage did not predict for bounce using any definition. Using definition 1, younger patients (< or = 65 years) had a bounce rate at 5 years of 38% vs. 24% for older patients (p = 0.009). 125I patients receiving an implant dose of < or = 160 Gy had a bounce rate (definition 1) at 5 years of 24% vs. 38% for those receiving a dose delivered to 90% of the gland on the 1 month postimplant dose-volume histogram (D90) >160 Gy (p = 0.04). Using definition 2, prostate volume significantly affected the incidence of bounce. Patients with larger glands (>35 cm(3)) were more likely to experience a bounce (23% at 5 years) than those with smaller glands (< or = 35 cm(3)) who had a bounce rate of 11% at 5 years (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis of factors predicting for PSA failure, PSA bounce was not found to be significant. CONCLUSION: PSA bounce is a common phenomenon after prostate brachytherapy and occurs at a rate of 17-31%, depending on the definition used. It is more common in younger patients, those receiving higher implant doses, and those with larger glands. PSA bounce does not predict for future PSA failure.     

Prediction of PSA bounce after permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Background  

We aimed to calculate the frequency and features of the development of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce after prostate brachytherapy alone, to correlate the bounce with clinical and dosimetric factors and to identify factors that predict PSA bounce.     

PSA bounce after permanent implant prostate brachytherapy may mimic a biochemical failure]

PurposeTo assess the frequency of the PSA “bouncing” phenomenon after a significant follow-up in a series of patients treated by permanent implant brachytherapy for a prostate cancer. To look for the clinical and dosimetric parameters possibly linked to this transitory secondary PSA increase. To evaluate in which percentage of cases this bouncing could have mimicked a biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus criteria.Patients and methodsFrom January 1999, to December 2001, 295 patients were treated by a permanent prostate implantation (real-time technique, with free ¹²⁵I seeds- Isoseed Bebig-) by the Institut Curie–Hôpital Cochin–Hôpital Necker Paris group. The mean follow-up is 40.3 months (9–66 months). The PSA level was regularly checked, at least every 6 months. We defined as a “bouncing” all increase in PSA, starting at 0.1 ng/ml, subsequently followed by a spontaneous (without any treatment) decrease, with return to the previous level or lower. We particularly focused on the patients fulfilling the criteria for a biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus (Three successive increases in PSA). A multivariate analysis tried to identify independent factors among the usual clinical and dosimetric parameters.ResultsIn our series, 161 patients (55%) showed a transitory PSA increase (bouncing) of at least 0.1 ng/ml; 145 patients (49%) a bouncing of 0.2 ng/ml, 93 patients (32%) a bouncing of 0.4 ng/ml and 43 patients (15%) a bouncing of at least 1 ng/ml. Mean PSA bounce was 0.8 ng/ml (0.1–4.1), and mean time to bounce was 19 months. Thirty-two patients (11% of the total number) presented three successive PSA increases with a significant (3 months) interval between the dosages, and therefore were to be considered as being in biochemical relapse according to the ASTRO consensus criteria. Actually, among those 32 patients, 18 (56%) subsequently showed a complete normalization of their PSA, without any treatment. Ten patients went on increasing their PSA, and were considered to be really in biochemical relapse. For the last 4 patients, the situation still remains ambiguous. In multivariate analysis, age < 70 years (P < 0.00001) and D90 > 200 Gy (P < 0.003) were identified as independent factors for a PSA bouncing of at least 0.4 ng/ml.ConclusionsThe observed rate of 32% of patients showing a PSA bouncing of at least 0.4 ng/ml in our series is in good agreement with what has been previously reported in the literature. Age < 70 years and D90 > 200 Gy were found to be independent factors predicting for such a secondary transitory increase in PSA. Interestingly, among 32 patients fulfilling the classical criteria of the ASTRO for a biochemical relapse, 18 (56%) subsequently showed a spontaneous PSA decrease, demonstrating that the ASTRO consensus is not well adapted to the biochemical follow-up of our patients undergoing permanent implant prostate Brachytherapy.     

PSA kinetics after prostate brachytherapy: PSA bounce phenomenon and its implications for PSA doubling time

PURPOSE: To analyze prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics in patients treated with prostate brachytherapy (PI) with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 162 patients treated with PI for localized prostate cancer with a minimum of 5 years of PSA follow-up were reviewed. A variety of pretreatment and posttreatment variables were examined. Patients were coded as having a PSA bounce if their PSA achieved a nadir, elevated at least 0.2 ng/mL greater than that nadir, and decreased to, or below, the initial nadir. Two definitions of biochemical failure (bF) or biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) were used: the classic American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition of three consecutive rises (bF3) and the nadir plus 2 ng/mL definition (bFn+2). Associations between a PSA bounce and the various pre- and posttreatment factors were assessed with logistic regression analysis, and the association between a PSA bounce and bF was examined with the log-rank test. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to test for differences in the PSA doubling time (PSADT) and the time to a PSA rise between the PSA bounce patients and the bF patients. PSADT was calculated from the nadir to the time of the first PSA rise, because this point is known first in the clinical setting. RESULTS: The 5-year overall bRFS rate was 87% for the bF3 definition and 96% for the bFn+2 definition. A PSA bounce was experienced by 75 patients (46.3%). Patients who experienced a PSA bounce were less likely to have a bF, regardless of the bRFS definition used (bF3: p=0.0015; bFn+2: p=0.0040). Among the pre- and posttreatment factors, only younger age predicted for a PSA bounce on multivariate analysis (p=0.0018). The use of androgen deprivation had no effect on PSA bounce. No difference was found in the PSADT between patients who had a PSA bounce and those with bF. The median PSADT for those with a PSA bounce was 8.3 months vs. 10.3 months using the bF3 definition and 8.8 months using the bFn+2 definition. However, a significant difference was found in the time to the first rise in PSA after PI for patients with a PSA bounce vs. patients with bF. The median time to the first rise in PSA after nadir for those with a PSA bounce was 15.1 months vs. 30.0 months using the bF3 definition (p=0.001) and 22.3 months using the bFn+2 definition (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing a PSA bounce are more likely to be younger and will have a better bRFS. The PSADT cannot differentiate a PSA bounce from bF. The time to the initial PSA rise after nadir is an excellent discriminator of bF from PSA bounce. The time of the PSA rise after nadir occurs far sooner for a PSA bounce than for bF. This factor should be considered when assessing a patient with a rising PSA level after PI before a patient is administered salvage therapy.     

辅助内分泌治疗配合放射性粒子组织间植入治疗局限性前列腺癌

 目的 探讨辅助内分泌治疗配合放射性粒子组织间植入治疗局限性前列腺癌的安全性和有效性。方法 22例T1 ~ T2c前列腺癌患者在采用直肠超声引导经会阴穿刺放射性125I粒子组织间植入治疗前后，给予辅助内分泌治疗4 ~ 7个月。术前2 ~ 4个月，术后1 ~ 4个月。结果 22例手术均顺利完成，手术时间60 ~ 120 min，植入125I粒子40 ~ 75枚，术后随访12 ~ 48个月，前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）＜1 ng／ml 15例，1 ng／ml≤PSA＜2 ng／ml 2例，PSA≥2 ng／ml 5例。结论 辅助内分泌治疗配合放射性粒子组织间植入治疗局限性前列腺癌安全有效     

Isotope and patient age predict for PSA spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy in low-risk patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study population consisted of 164 prostate cancer patients who were part of a prospective randomized trial comparing (103)Pd and (125)I for low-risk disease. Of the 164 patients, 61 (37.2%) received short-course androgen deprivation therapy. The median follow-up was 5.4 years. On average, 11.1 post-treatment PSA measurements were obtained per patient. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined as a PSA level of < or =0.40 ng/mL after nadir. A PSA spike was defined as an increase of > or =0.2 ng/mL, followed by a durable decline to prespike levels. Multiple parameters were evaluated as predictors for a PSA spike. RESULTS: Of the 164 patients, 44 (26.9%) developed a PSA spike. Of the 46 hormone-naive (125)I patients and 57 hormone-naive (103)Pd patients, 21 (45.7%) and 8 (14.0%) developed a PSA spike. In the hormone-naive patients, the mean time between implantation and the spike was 22.6 months and 18.7 months for (125)I and (103)Pd, respectively. In patients receiving neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, the incidence of spikes was comparable between isotopes ((125)I 28.1% and (103)Pd 20.7%). The incidence of spikes was substantially different in patients <65 years vs. > or =65 years old (38.5% vs. 16.3%). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, patient age (p < 0.001) and isotope (p = 0.002) were significant predictors for spike. CONCLUSION: In low-risk prostate cancer, PSA spikes are most common in patients implanted with (125)I and/or <65 years of age. Differences in isotope-related spikes are most pronounced in hormone-naive patients.     

PSA bounces after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and external beam radiation: impact on definitions of failure

PURPOSE: To determine the characteristics of prostate specific antigen (PSA) bounces after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and their impact on definitions of biochemical failure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Characteristics of bounce were calculated for all patients treated by EBRT with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation at our institution between 1992 and 1998 (preexclusion analysis). Calculations were repeated for the subgroup that satisfied additional inclusion/exclusion criteria (postexclusion analysis). The percentage of bounces scoring as false positives according to the ASTRO definition of biochemical failure was compared with those for three alternative definitions (Vancouver, Nadir-plus-two, and Nadir-plus-three) using McNemar's tests. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent (preexclusion cohort) and 56% (postexclusion cohort) of patients demonstrated a PSA bounce. Twenty percent (preexclusion analysis) and 25% (postexclusion analysis) of these bounces scored as biochemical failure according to the ASTRO definition. The Nadir-plus-three definition scored the smallest percentage of bounces as failure, but the difference between this definition and the ASTRO definition reached statistical significance in neither preexclusion nor postexclusion analyses (p >/= 0.070). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients treated by EBRT with neoadjuvant deprivation experienced a PSA bounce. A large percentage of these bounces scored as biochemical failure according to the ASTRO definition. The Nadir-plus-three definition is less vulnerable to this bias.     

Transient elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen following (125)I/(103)Pd brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Based on suggestions by anecdotal evidence to date, an attempt is made to estimate the occurrence of non-disease-related prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spiking in the serum PSA profiles of a series of men treated by (125)I/(103)Pd brachytherapy with or without external beam irradiation. Five hundred ninety-one patients treated between January 1988 and December 1993 were eligible for study. Patients whose clinical status was described as equivocal (declining PSA > 1.0 ng/mL or rising PSA without documented disease [9.6% of the cohort]) were not considered. Evidence of PSA increases that were followed by decline were identified. Treatment and disease-specific parameters were examined for influence of the occurrence of spiking. In patients judged biochemical successes at last follow-up (serum PSA < or = 1.0 ng/mL), 35.8% exhibited a temporary increase of 0.2 ng/mL or more. Seventy-five percent of these patients exhibited a temporary increase between 0.3 and 3.4 ng/mL. The average time of the temporary increases was 24.8 months after implant. Spiking was not associated with a higher risk of clinical failure in this data set. Conventional risk factors for recurrent disease were not associated with benign PSA spiking. Low-magnitude serum PSA spiking may occur in up to one third of patients following permanent, low-dose rate brachytherapy of the prostate. Most of these observations occur up to 3 years after implant and do not appear to be related to disease recurrence. Caution should be taken before initiating further therapy pursuant to the observation of PSA spiking of less than 2 to 3 ng/mL shortly following brachytherapy. Frequent serum PSA sampling following prostate brachytherapy with early follow-up may overestimate biochemical failure rates.     

Rationale for using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and PSA density (PSAD) to detect prostatic malignancy in a country with low prostate cancer incidence

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) values in Indonesia had been found uniquely much higher than the normal accepted values in western countries. However, PSA more than 10 ng/ml and PSAD above 0.15 in intermediate PSA of 4-10 ng/ml are still indicative of a prostate biopsy. This condition had led to unnecessary biopsies in view of the low incidence of prostatic carcinoma in our country. Our objective is to find alternative serum PSA levels and PSAD cutoff points that enhance the specificity and sensitivity of prostate cancer detection. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 805 consecutive patients from 40 to 95 years old in Sumber Waras Hospital (SWH) and Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (CMH) from 1994 to 1997. All patients underwent digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) to measure prostate volume. After the serum PSA level was determined and PSAD was calculated, prostate biopsies were performed if the PSA level was greater than 10 ng/ml or PSAD more than 0.15 at intermediate PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml. The ability of PSA, intermediate PSA level, and PSAD to improve the accuracy of prostate cancer detection was evaluated using univariate analysis. Among 805 patients, 240 patients had PSA level < 4 ng/ml, 230 patients had PSA level 4-10 ng/ml, and 335 had PSA level > 10 ng/ml. Of the 230 patients with intermediate PSA level, 108 had PSAD > 0.15. Thirty-five patients had histologically confirmed prostatic carcinoma, i.e., 3 of 108 patients with PSA 4-10 ng/ml and PSAD > 0.15, and 32 of 335 patients with PSA > 10 ng/ml. There were 105 and 303 unnecessary biopsies in those groups. With a PSA cutoff level of > or = 8 ng/ml, we found 100% sensitivity to prostate cancer. PSAD > or = 0.20 within a PSA level of 8-30 ng/ml gave 100% sensitivity to prostate cancer. Using these new cutoffs there would be 148 biopsies (33.4%) saved. We concluded from this study that the commonly accepted values of serum PSA level and PSAD resulted in many unnecessary biopsies in our patients. Instead, the most sensitive cutoff points to perform prostate biopsy are serum PSA level greater than 8.0 ng/ml, and PSAD of more than 0.20 at an intermediate serum PSA level of 8-30 ng/ml.     

Brachytherapy with transperineal (125)Iodine seeds for localized prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze the treatment results of transperineal (125)Iodine seeds in localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1996, 102 patients with T1-T2 N0 prostate cancer were treated with transperineal (125)Iodine seed implants at the Academic Medical Centre in Amsterdam. Tumours were classified as T1c in four patients, T2a in 73 patients and T2b in 25 patients. The mean pre-treatment PSA was 17 ng/ml. The (125)Iodine seeds were implanted transperineally under transrectal ultrasound guidance. The mean prostate volume was 31 ml (range 15-48 ml). An average of 49 seeds (range 29-74) was implanted. The dose to the periphery of the prostate was 160 Gy. Until 1988, 27 patients had additional external pelvic irradiation to a dose of 40 Gy in 20 daily fractions of 2 Gy. RESULTS: The 5- and 7-year actuarial survival rates were 77 and 63%, respectively (median 102 months). Ten patients (9.5%) died from prostate cancer. The 5- and 7-year clinical progression rates were 12 and 17%, respectively. Biochemical failure rates at 5 and 7 years were 39 and 44%, respectively. Age, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, differentiation grade, additional treatment, staging procedure, number of seeds, prostate volume, treatment period and PSA were analyzed as prognostic factors. Only pre-treatment PSA was a prognosticator of clinical and biochemical outcome but not of survival. Biochemical control at 6 years varied from 30% for pre-treatment PSA values higher than 20 ng/ml to 95% for values < or =8 ng/ml. Forty-one out of 49 patients who were sexually active before brachytherapy maintained sexual function during the follow-up. Complete urinary incontinence occurred in one patient. No rectal complications were seen in patients receiving brachytherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal (125)Iodine seeds brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer achieves a good clinical control and overall survival with acceptable late toxicity. Biochemical failure was strongly correlated to the pre-treatment PSA value.     

Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) in the postoperative treatment of an adenocarcinoma of the endometrium complicated by a pelvic kidney

Purpose

To report early observation of transient PSA elevations on this pilot study of external beam radiation therapy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost.

Materials and methods

Eleven patients with intermediate-risk and high-risk localized prostate cancer received MRI guided HDR brachytherapy (10.5 Gy each fraction) before and after a course of external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy). Two patients continued on hormones during follow-up and were censored for this analysis. Four patients discontinued hormone therapy after RT. Five patients did not receive hormones. PSA bounce is defined as a rise in PSA values with a subsequent fall below the nadir value or to below 20% of the maximum PSA level. Six previously published definitions of biochemical failure to distinguish true failure from were tested: definition 1, rise >0.2 ng/mL; definition 2, rise >0.4 ng/mL; definition 3, rise >35% of previous value; definition 4, ASTRO defined guidelines, definition 5 nadir + 2 ng/ml, and definition 6, nadir + 3 ng/ml.

Results

Median follow-up was 24 months (range 18–36 mo). During follow-up, the incidence of transient PSA elevation was: 55% for definition 1, 44% for definition 2, 55% for definition 3, 33% for definition 4, 11% for definition 5, and 11% for definition 6.

Conclusion

We observed a substantial incidence of transient elevations in PSA following combined external beam radiation and HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Such elevations seem to be self-limited and should not trigger initiation of salvage therapies. No definition of failure was completely predictive.     

Feasibility of high-dose-rate brachytherapy salvage for local prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy: the University of California-San Francisco experience

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of salvage high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed 21 consecutively accrued patients undergoing salvage HDR brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after EBRT between November 1998 and December 2005. After pathologic confirmation of locally recurrent disease, all patients were treated with 36 Gy in six fractions using two transrectal ultrasound-guided HDR prostate implants, separated by 1 week. Eleven patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy immediately presalvage, whereas none received adjuvant hormonal therapy postsalvage. Median follow-up time from recurrence was 18.7 months (range, 6-84 months). Determination of subsequent biochemical failure after brachytherapy was based on the definition by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. RESULTS: Based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 3), 18 patients reported Grade 1 to 2 genitourinary symptoms by 3 months postsalvage. Three patients developed Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. Maximum observed gastrointestinal toxicity was Grade 2; all cases spontaneously resolved. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of biochemical control after recurrence was 89%. Thirteen patients have achieved a PSA nadir < or =0.1 ng/ml, but at the time of writing this endpoint has not yet been reached for all patients. All patients are alive; however 2 have experienced biochemical failure, both with PSA nadirs > or =1, and have subsequently been found to have distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy appears to be feasible and effective.     

Four-year biochemical outcome after radioimmunoguided transperineal brachytherapy for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate 4-year biochemical outcomes for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma who underwent radioimmunoguided (Prostascint) permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighty patients with clinical T1C-T3A NxM0 prostate cancer underwent ProstaScint-guided prostate brachytherapy using either (103)Pd or (125)I between February 1997 and December 2000. Sixty-seven patients underwent prostate brachytherapy alone, whereas 13 patients received neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation before implantation. Risk factors (RF) included PSA >10, Stage >or=T2b, and Gleason grade >or=7. Sixty patients had low-risk disease (0 RF), 17 were intermediate risk (1 RF), and 3 were high risk (2 RF). Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was calculated using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus criteria, a PSA cutoff of 1.0 ng/mL, and a PSA cutoff of 0.5 ng/mL. RESULTS: Four-year bDFS for the entire cohort was 97.4% using the ASTRO consensus criteria. Low-risk patients (60) had a 4-year bDFS of 100%; intermediate- and high-risk patients (20 patients) were 89.2%. The hormonally na?ve group (67 patients) had a 4-year bDFS of 96.9% and a median PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL. Median time to nadir was 19.8 months (range: 1.9-53.2 months). For the neoadjuvant hormonal therapy group (13 patients), ASTRO-defined bDFS was 100%. Overall, 85.2% of patients had a posttreatment PSA 相似文献   

Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for clinically organ-confined high-grade prostate cancer with a pretreatment PSA < 20 ng/mL

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of biopsy Gleason score 8 and 9 histology on biochemical outcome following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that includes multiple periprostatic seeds and supplemental external beam radiation. Forty-six consecutive T1c-T2b (1997 AJCC) patients with Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer who were either hormone naive (33 patients) or received cytoreductive (< or =6 months) hormonal therapy (13 patients) underwent brachytherapy from June 1995 to November 2000. The median patient age was 69.7 years, with a median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 7.7 ng/mL. The median follow-up was 58 months (range 27-93 months). Forty-five of the patients were implanted with Pd-103 and 44 received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy). Biochemical success was defined by either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL after a nadir or by the ASTRO consensus definition. The actuarial 7-year biochemical disease-free survival was 84.8% using either a PSA < or = 0.4 ng/mL or the ASTRO consensus definition. The median postimplant PSA was less than 0.1 ng/mL for both the hormone naive and hormonally manipulated patients. The utilization of hormonal therapy for 6 months or less duration resulted in a statistically nonsignificant improvement in biochemical outcome (92.3% versus 81.8%, P = 0.393). When stratified by pretreatment PSA, 87.9% of patients with a pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL and 76.9% with a pretreatment PSA > 10 ng/mL (P = 0.377) remained biochemically free of disease. In multivariate analysis, none of the clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters predicted for outcome. Following a permanent prostate brachytherapy approach that used multiple periprostatic seeds, the majority of patients with clinically organ-confined Gleason score 8 and 9 prostate cancer remain biochemically free of disease with identical outcomes for both biochemical definitions of success.     

Transperineal 125iodine implantation for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer: 5-year tumor control and morbidity

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of transperineal 125I implants for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly men in a community cancer setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1988 to 1993, 206 patients, median age 77 years, with localized (Stage T1 and T2), low-grade (Gleason score < or = 7) prostate cancer were treated using pre-planned 125I transperineal implants. Patients were followed for biochemical freedom from disease, overall survival, and treatment-associated morbidity. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial biochemical freedom from failure rate for all patients available for follow-up was 63%. Specifically, biochemical freedom from failure was 76% in patients with pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/ml, compared to 51% of patients with values > 10 ng/ml (median observation time 35 months). Actuarial freedom from failure for patients with PSA < or = 4 ng/ml was 84%. Stage and Gleason score did not predict outcome. PSA nadir was the strongest predictor of long-term biochemical disease-free survival (p < 0.001) with only 2 failures in 62 patients who achieved a posttreatment PSA nadir < or = 0.5 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: Transperineal 125I implants for early prostate cancer are efficacious and feasible for certain populations of elderly patients with favorable prognostic indicators in the community cancer setting. Patients with poor prognostic indicators at diagnosis do not appear to be candidates for treatment with implant alone. ( 1999 El.vit r 'Cio;noo lnc     

Prostate-specific antigen spikes after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether any clinical, treatment, or dosimetric parameters correlated with the development of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) spike after permanent prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The evaluated population consisted of 218 hormone-naive patients free of biochemical or clinical failure who underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy with or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy for clinical Stage T1b-T3a adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland (1997 AJCC) between August 1995 and November 1999. No patient underwent pre- or postimplant hormonal manipulation, pretreatment seminal vesicle biopsy, or pathologic lymph node staging. In addition, none of the 218 patients possessed equivocal biochemical results (one or two consecutive PSA rises or a declining PSA >1.0 ng/mL). The median patient follow-up was 46.2 months. A PSA spike was defined as a rise of >or=0.2 ng/mL, followed by a durable decline. The clinical parameters evaluated included patient age, clinical T stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, prostate volume, brachytherapy planning volume, and patient follow-up in months. The evaluated treatment parameters included isotope and use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy. The dosimetric parameters evaluated included the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)), the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% (V(100)), 150%, and 200% (V(200)) of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the mean, median, maximal, and minimal urethral doses. Biochemical disease-free survival was defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition with the additional constraint that the most recent PSA level was 0.2 to 0.5 to 1.0 ng/mL (20%, 50%, and 80%, respectively, p <0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. A postimplant dosimetric threshold of either <115% of the minimal peripheral dose for D(90) or <55% of the prostate volume for V(150) was strongly predictive of a spike. When the variables only determinable after the occurrence of the PSA spike were included in the multivariate analysis, V(150), preimplant PSA level, and nadir PSA were the significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Of the patients, 23.9% developed a PSA spike with a median time to development of 16.3 months and a median prespike and median postspike PSA of 0.50 ng/mL and 0.90 ng/mL, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patient age, clinical stage, first postimplant PSA level, and V(150) were predictive for the development of a PSA spike. At approximately 66 months after implantation, the PSA curves converged for spike and nonspike patients, with a median PSA level <0.1 ng/mL.