Widespread chromosomal abnormalities in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Comparative genomic hybridization study of pure high-grade DCIS

For a variety of technical reasons it is rarely possible to study cytogenetic abnormalities in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using traditional techniques. However, by combining molecular biology and computerized image analysis it is possible to carry out cytogenetic analyses on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of chromosomal amplifications and deletions in high-grade DCIS and to look specifically for unique or consistent abnormalities in this pre-invasive cancer. Twenty-three cases of asymptomatic, non-palpable, screen-detected, high-grade DCIS were examined using CGH on tumour cells obtained from histology slides. All cases showed chromosomal abnormalities. A wide variety of amplifications and deletions were spread across the genome. The most frequent changes were gains of chromosomes 17 (13 of 23), 16p (13 of 23), and 20q (9 of 23) and amplifications of 11q13 (22 of 23), 12q 24.1–24.2 (12 of 23), 6p21.3 (11 of 23), and 1q31-qter (6 of 23). The most frequent deletions were on 13q 21.3–q33 (7 of 23), 9p21 (4 of 23), and 6q16.1 (4 of 23). These findings indicate that high-grade DCIS is, from a cytogenetic viewpoint, an advanced lesion. There was no absolutely consistent finding in every case, but amplification of 11q13 was found in 22 of the 23 cases. The precise significance of this is unknown at present. This region of chromosome 11q harbours a number of known oncogenes, including cyclinD1 and INT2. It is likely that many of these findings are the result of accumulated chromosomal abnormalities, reflecting an unstable genome in established malignancy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization of ductal carcinoma in situ and synchronous invasive lobular cancer

It has been increasingly recognized that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and invasive cancer of the breast are often closely associated with one another. However, the genomic relationship between these histologically distinct entities has not been well characterized. Refinements in high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) techniques allow for a detailed comparison of genomic alterations in synchronously occurring tumors. The following case illustrates how array CGH may be used to better understand whether synchronous neoplasms share a common origin.     

Genomic profiling of gastric carcinoma in situ and adenomas by array‐based comparative genomic hybridization

Although genomic copy number aberrations (CNAs) of gastric carcinoma at the advanced stage have already been extensively characterized by array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) analysis, those of gastric carcinoma in situ (CIS) are still poorly understood. Furthermore, no reports have demonstrated correlations between CNAs and histopathological features of gastric adenoma. In this study, we investigated CNAs of 20 gastric CISs (Vienna category 4.2) and 20 adenomas including seven low‐grade adenomas (LGA; Vienna category 3) and 13 high‐grade adenomas (HGA; Vienna category 4.1), using oligonucleotide‐based array CGH. The most frequent aberrations in CIS were gains at 8q (85%) and 20q (50%), and losses at 5q (50%) and 17p (50%), suggesting that these CNAs are involved in the development of CIS. We found that the pattern of CNAs in HGA was quite different from that in LGA. The most frequent CNAs in HGA were gains at 8q (62%) and 7pq (54%), whereas those in LGA were gain at 7q21.3‐q22.1 (57%) and loss at 5q (43%). Interestingly, gains at 8q and 7pq, both of which occurred most frequently in HGA, were not detected in any cases of LGA. Of note, 8q gain was detected most frequently in both HGA and CIS but was undetected in LGA. Since HGA is believed to have a higher risk of progression to invasive carcinoma than LGA, these data suggest that 8q gain is important for the malignant transformation of gastric adenoma. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Heterogeneous versus homogeneous genetic nature of multiple foci of in situ carcinoma of the breast

The vast majority of in situ breast cancers represent focal lesions all derived from a single clone and requiring local treatment alone. We focused our attention on rare cases of multicentric in situ carcinomas affecting different quadrants, which required mastectomy. Defining the origin from single- or multiple-cell clones of separate independent neoplastic foci in the breast may be of pathogenetic interest and of importance in deciding the type of therapy to be administered. We employed a molecular assay based on loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and human androgen receptor assay (HUMARA) analysis of microdissected samples from 19 mastectomies. Two or more tissue samples were obtained from 7 patients with multicentric lobular in situ carcinoma (LCIS), either classical or large-cell variety; and 12 patients with multicentric ductal in situ carcinomas (DCIS), either low-grade (7 cases) or high-grade (5 cases) variety. Separate foci of high-grade (comedonic) DCIS were found to be monoclonal in nature. On the contrary, definite evidence favoring the origin from different cell clones of separate carcinomatous foci within the same breast was obtained in 2 cases of low-grade DCIS and in 6 cases of LCIS. A genetic imbalance might be the factor favoring the development of multifocal heterogeneous foci of in situ breast cancer. Such a small subgroup of in situ cancers affecting diffusely the entire breast and originating from independent foci presents both clinical and pathogenetic interest.     

Recognizing breast ductal carcinoma in situ on fine‐needle aspiration: A diagnostic dilemma

In this study, we evaluated cytomorphologic features of different subgroups of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); we compared seven cytologic features between DCIS and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) aspirates to determine whether diagnosis of stromal invasion can be made based on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) findings. There were 142 cases of DCIS and 1,978 cases of IDC enrolled in our study. FNA analysis revealed 80.3% sensitivity for DCIS and 94.7% sensitivity for IDC. High and intermediate grade DCIS exhibited marked nuclear abnormality (92.1% vs. 35.7%, 30.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 < 0.001) and necrosis (69.7% vs. 0%, 10.0%; P1 < 0.001, P2 = 0.001) in a higher percentage of cases compared to low grade DCIS and intraductal/intracystic papillary carcinoma. The rates of background macrophages (71.3% for DCIS and 21.9% for IDC, P < 0.001) and extensive necrosis (54.0% for DCIS and 16.7% for IDC, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in DCIS compared to IDC. Lymphocytes were observed in conjunction with tumor cells more frequently in IDC (81.3%) compared to DCIS (36.8%, P < 0.001). Stromal fragments associated with tumor cells were only observed in invasive lesions (11.9% micro‐invasive DCIS and 52.1% IDC). Tubular structures were found exclusively in IDC (11.5%). Cytologic criteria for diagnosis of high and low grade DCIS are different. The suspicion of DCIS is raised when background macrophages and extensive necrosis are observed. Stromal invasion is suggested by FNA if lymphocytes are entwined around tumor cells or if stromal fragments associated with tumor cells or tubular structures are observed. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:710–715. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Genetic pathways in the evolution of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

The patterns of allelic loss in 28 cases of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 25 cases of DCIS associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were compared, in order to define whether pure DCIS represented an earlier stage than DCIS associated with IDC in the progression of breast carcinoma. To this aim, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on microdissected normal and neoplastic breast tissue, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Fifteen microsatellite markers were examined, on chromosomes 1p, 3p, 7q, 11q, 12p, 13q, 16q and 17q, mostly focused on regions altered in breast cancer. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was greater in pure DCIS than in the DCIS component associated with IDC for 11 out of 15 markers. The difference was statistically significant for D13S260 and D17S800 (p=0.008 and p=0.01, respectively). DCIS associated with IDC showed a lesser degree of alteration than the synchronous IDC component for ten out of 15 markers. In contrast, LOH at D11S1816 and D16S318 was lower in pure DCIS than in DCIS associated with IDC and even greater in the IDC component. These results confirm that DCIS is a possible but not an obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer and suggest that pure DCIS and DCIS associated with IDC may be genetically distinct. The evolution from DCIS to IDC may follow multiple pathways and not a linear model.     

乳腺导管内癌分子分型应用研究

目的 采用免疫组织化学检测方法 对乳腺导管内癌进行分子分型.方法 收集50例乳腺导管内癌存档蜡块,用单克隆抗体CK5/6、CK8、CK18、34βE12、p63、S-100、SMA、CD10、CD117、EGFR、ER、PR和HER2进行免疫组织化学EnVision法染色,按照免疫表型分为5种类型:腺腔A型(ER+/PR+/HER2-)、腺腔B型(ER+/PR+/HER2+)、正常乳腺样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-且不表达基底/肌上皮标记及EGFR)、HER2过表达型(ER-/PR-/HER2+)和基底细胞样型(ER-/PR-/HER2-,且至少表达一种基底型角蛋白和(或)肌上皮标记物或EGFR).结果 腺腔A型16例(32%),腺腔B型19例(38%),HER2过表达型13例(26%),基底细胞样型2例(4%),无正常乳腺型.2例基底细胞样型,均表达CK5/6、CD117,例1同时表达SMA,例2表达CK8、CK18、34βE12、S-100,均为高级别导管内癌.结论 乳腺导管内癌可按免疫表型进行分子分型,部分导管内癌具有与基底细胞样癌相同的免疫表型,可能是基底细胞样癌的前驱病变,其诊断依赖于免疫组化检测.     

Loss of heterozygosity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at loci reported to show allele loss in invasive breast cancers was examined in ductal in situ carcinomas of the breast using polymorphic short tandem repeats and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). LOH was detected at all loci examined in at least 11 per cent of the samples examined. The proportion of cases of in situ carcinoma showing LOH at these loci was similar to that previously reported in invasive cancers. Cases of pure in situ cancer without an invasive component exhibited an overall lower frequency of allele loss. LOH at more than one locus was observed in some intraductal cancers. In a small number of cases, LOH was present in the invasive but not in the intraductal component of the tumour, suggesting that mutation at the locus concerned was associated with development of invasive behaviour.     

HER2 status in pure ductal carcinoma in situ and in the intraductal and invasive components of invasive ductal carcinoma determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

AIM: To determine the HER2 status of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast. The increased prevalence of HER2 amplification and overexpression in DCIS is considered to be maintained in the intraductal component of IDC; however, HER2 amplification and overexpression are detected much less in IDC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were performed to detect HER2 in 270 IDCs with an intraductal component and in 50 pure DCIS samples; IHC was also performed in 116 metastatic nodes. HER2 was found to be amplified in 77 cases (28.5%) and overexpressed in 79 (29.3%) of the 270 IDCs. HER2 amplification was similar between intraductal and invasive components of the same tumour. The concordance for HER2 status between invasive and intraductal components of individual tumours was 98.5% and 99.3% by FISH and IHC, respectively. HER2 was amplified in 25 (50%) of the 50 pure DCIS samples. HER2 overexpression in metastatic nodes resembled the HER2 status in the primary tumour for 108 (93.1%) of 116 cases (kappa =0.831). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that the intraductal component of IDC may differ biologically when compared with pure DCIS. HER2 appears to lack a critical role in the progression from DCIS to IDC and HER2 status is maintained in metastatic lesions.     

Neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (NE-DCIS) of the breast--comparative clinicopathological study of 20 NE-DCIS cases and 274 non-NE-DCIS cases

Aims:  To clarify the clinicopathological significance of breast neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ (NE-DCIS), i.e. DCIS in which >50% of cells immunohistochemically express NE markers (chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin), 20 NE-DCIS were studied and the findings compared with those of 274 non-NE-DCIS.
Methods and results:  NE-DCIS accounted for 6.8% of all DCIS. Mean patient age was 50.4 years for NE-DCIS and 49.6 years for non-NE-DCIS ( P  = 0.66). The main clinical presentation of NE-DCIS was a bloody nipple discharge, seen in 72%, significantly different from the 5% in non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01). Carcinoma was preoperatively diagnosed in 67% of NE-DCIS and 95% of non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01). NE-DCIS was histologically characterized by a predominantly solid growth of cancer cells with fine-granular cytoplasm and ovoid, or occasionally spindle-shaped nuclei. A well-developed vascular network was also common. Nuclear grades and Van Nuys classification were significantly lower for NE-DCIS than for non-NE-DCIS ( P  < 0.01). The mean MIB-1 labelling index was 4.3% in NE-DCIS and 8.1% in non-NE-DCIS ( P  < 0.01). Furthermore, NE-DCIS cases had significantly higher oestrogen and progesterone receptor and lower HER2 scores than non-NE-DCIS cases ( P  < 0.01).
Conclusions:  NE-DCIS has characteristic clinicopathological features and can, therefore, be regarded as a distinct variant of DCIS.     

Validation of immunolocalization of the urokinase receptor expression in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison with detection by non-isotopic in-situ hybridization

AIMS: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a pre-invasive form of mammary carcinoma with no microscopic evidence of cancer cell invasion through the basement membrane. However, for initiation of invasion, tumour cells have to acquire and focus proteolytic activity on to the cell surface in order to infiltrate the surrounding extracellular matrix. The receptor (uPA-R or CD87) for the serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) plays a central role in invasion and metastasis. This study was performed to determine and localize m-RNA and protein of uPA-R in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed uPA-R mRNA and protein expression by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in 50 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of DCIS. Three different antibodies were used to stain cell-associated uPA-R; chicken polyclonal antibody (pAb) HU277 and monoclonal antibodies (mAb) IID7 and 3936. In all cases, myoepithelial and stromal cells reacted with either antibody. Especially, reaction of macrophage-like cells with mAb 3936 resulted in a well-marked and bright staining. Applying mAb IID7, in 46 of the 50 breast specimens tumour cells showed a positive immunoreaction. Likewise pAb HU277 stained tumour cells in 40 of the 50 cases, whereas mAb 3936 reacted with only 24 of the 50 tissue sections. Endothelial cells were marked by both mAb IID7 and pAb HU277 (46/50 and 35/50, respectively); mAb 3936 did not label at all. All of the cell types stained by mAb IID7 and pAb HU277 also displayed reactivity with uPA-R mRNA-specific antisense oligonucleotides in in-situ hybridization. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the presence of the tumour invasion-related receptor for the protease uPA not only in invasive ductal breast carcinoma but also in different types of DCIS.     

Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast

The advent of mammography screening presents a diagnostic challenge to the cytopathologist as an increasing proportion of breast lesions requiring investigation will be nonpalpable and up to 40% will be accounted for by atypical intraductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ, as opposed to previously, when these lesions represented less than 10% of palpable tumors. We studied 133 fine-needle aspirates from breast tumors and found that nuclear morphology, myoepithelial cells, signs of invasion, and degree of cellular dissociation are among the most potent factors discriminating between benign epithelial proliferations, atypical intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma.     

Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

AIMS: To compare the morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative and ER-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, in an attempt to establish more objective criteria for the classification of DCIS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sections of 64 cases of in-situ carcinoma of the breast were stained for ER, progesterone receptors (PgR), androgen receptors (AR), c-erbB-2 and p53, using the immunoperoxidase technique. The cases included 60 DCIS and four lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Four DCIS lesions were associated with foci of microinvasion. The 60 DCIS cases included 31 high grade, 23 intermediate grade and six low grade. Twenty-four DCIS cases (40%) were ER-negative and 36 were positive. ER negativity was significantly associated with high nuclear grade (88% versus 27% for ER-positive cases, P < 0.001), PgR negativity (100% versus 25%, P < 0.001), c-erbB-2 positivity (79% versus 14%, P < 0.001) and p53 positivity (58% versus 6%, P < 0.001). There was no difference between ER-negative and -positive DCIS as regards AR expression, with 91% of cases in each group being AR-positive. Of the four cases of DCIS with microinvasion, three were ER- and PgR-negative, all four were c-erbB-2-positive and AR-positive and one was p53-positive. None of the four LCIS was ER, PgR or AR-negative and none was c-erbB-2- or p53-positive. CONCLUSIONS: There is a highly significant direct relationship between ER negativity in DCIS and high nuclear grade, PgR negativity and c-erbB-2 and p53 positivity. We suggest that immunohistological assessment of ER status may help in providing a more objective way of classifying DCIS.     

Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics

The quality of cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours has greatly improved in the past decade, but a number of technical difficulties remain which limit the characterization of solid tumour chromosomes by conventional cytogenetics alone. The identification of regions of chromosomal abnormality has been aided by the introduction of molecular cytogenetic techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of these, a recently developed approach, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), has had a particular impact on the cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours. It incorporates the sensitivity of in situ techniques and overcomes many of the drawbacks of conventional cytogenetic analysis. This review first outlines the CGH method, giving details for the preparation of DNA probes and target human metaphase chromosomes together with information on the in situ technique and data handling criteria used in our laboratory. It then presents an overview of some of the current applications of CGH, together with a discussion of future directions in the field. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

用荧光原位杂交技术检测乳腺癌细胞系第6号染色体长臂缺失

目的 研究１０例乳腺癌细胞系的６号染色体第臂缺失。方法 运用荧光原位杂交（ｆｌｕｏｒｅｓｃｅｎｃｅ ｉｎ ｓｉｔｕ ｈｙｂｒｉｄｉｚａｔｉｏｎ,ＦＩＳＨ）技术,并采用３７个分布于６ｑ１２－６ｑ２７的ＹＡＣ探针和６号染色体着丝粒特异性探针,检测了１０例乳腺癌细胞系的６号染色体长臂。结果 在５例细胞系中发现６ｑ１２－６ｑ２７的大段缺失,１例发现有６ｑ２５－ｑ２７的小段缺失。在含有多个细胞亚群的两侧细胞     

乳腺导管原位癌病理形态及c-erbB-2、p53和PCNA表达

目的：对乳腺导管原位癌进行病理形态分析，并行ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３癌基因蛋白、增殖细胞核抗原（ＰＣＮＡ）表达以及相关性的研究，以期为临床判断潜在恶性程度及预后提供参考指标。方法：运用病理形态分析以及枸橼酸－微波－ＡＢＣ免疫组化法对２５例常规福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋乳腺导管原位癌组织进行回顾性研究。结果：（１）２５例乳腺原位导管癌ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率分别为３６．０％，４０．０％和４０．０％；（２）粉刺型ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ表达的阳性率均高于非粉刺型，而且ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２阳性率相差有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）；（３）坏死、核异型性、核分裂数与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２、ｐ５３、ＰＣＮＡ的表达有关，其中，坏死与ＰＣＮＡ阳性表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５），核异型性与ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２蛋白表达显著相关（Ｐ＜０．０５）。结论：乳腺导管原位癌无论病理形态还是生物学行为都是异质性的，除了组织学亚型，某些形态指标以及ｃ－ｅｒｂＢ－２癌基因蛋白的表达也可作为恶性度指标。     

Clonal profiling of mixed lobular and ductal carcinoma revealed by multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization

A needle biopsy of a mass in the right breast of a 36‐year‐old woman revealed invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and approximately 20% of cancer cells showed unequivocal membranous staining with the HercepTest. After systemic therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by FEC (fluorouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide), a right mastectomy was performed. By histological and immunohistochemical examinations, the resected tumor consisted mainly of E‐cadherin‐negative invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and the rest was ERBB2‐positive IDC; thus, the diagnosis was mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma. Multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses revealed that ILC and IDC shared high‐level amplification of CCND1 in homogeneously staining regions (HSR) and that IDC had an additional HSR‐type amplicon of ERBB2. These findings strongly indicate that IDC and ILC had a common precursor cell with CCND1 amplification. Review of the biopsy specimen with FISH showed IDC with gene amplifications of CCND1 and ERBB2 as a minor component, IDC without amplification of CCND1 or ERBB2 as a major component, and a minute portion of ILC with CCND1 amplification. We speculate that chemotherapy and trastuzumab caused a marked reduction in IDC; however, ILC with CCND1 amplification was resistant to chemotherapy and grew.     

Quality aspects of the tissue microarray technique in a population‐based cohort with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Aims: Tissue microarray (TMA) is an efficient technique for analysis of molecular markers. Prospectively collected samples have been reported to give excellent concordance between TMA data and corresponding whole‐sections. The aim was to evaluate the usefulness of TMA in a population‐based cohort of 213 women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS). Methods and results: We studied immunohistochemical HER2, oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor status. The prognostic impact was similar for all markers comparing whole sections and TMAs. The proportion of positive tumours was similar regarding HER2 and ER, whereas PR tumours were more frequently positive in the TMAs (P = 0.007). The concordance was 80% (κ value 0.63) between original sections and TMAs. The proportion of successfully analysed tumours was 70%. Smaller tumours had a lower ratio (P < 0.0001) and a larger proportion of mismatched results (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Retrospective analyses of tumours from cohorts with long‐term follow‐up are indispensable. We have shown that the TMA technique is a useful tool for high‐throughput analysis of DCIS. However, our study has pinpointed some technical hazards within a population‐based cohort, including many small lesions and the poor condition of some donor blocks. Mismatched results may be due to tumour heterogeneity.