Directly observed hepatitis C treatment with opioid substitution therapy in community pharmacies: A qualitative study

BackgroundThe hepatitis C virus (HCV) will only be eliminated through successful engagement with people who inject drugs (PWID), however some of this population experience socioeconomic and individual issues that can lead to poor HCV treatment adherence. A key sub-group of (PWID) are those who receive opioid substitution therapy (OST). In Australia, OST is most often delivered under direct supervision by a community pharmacist every day or multiple times a week. This regular interaction could be an ideal opportunity to enhance direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment adherence under directly observed therapy (DOT) by the pharmacist.AimThe aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of OST patients with a lived experience of HCV to understand whether or not dispensing DAAs in the same way as, or simultaneously with OST would benefit HCV treatment.MethodsData collection occurred from June to August 2017. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of PWID living with HCV and on OST programs (n = 12) in Melbourne, Australia. Interviews were voice recorded and transcribed in verbatim. Interpretive phenomenology guided analysis of the data.ResultsThemes reported by participants that provide insight into the suitability of DOT of DAAs include: Adherence and non-adherence to DAA treatment; Mixed views towards DOT of DAAs; Experiences and perceptions of OST providers; and Perceived stigma in the pharmacy.ConclusionsCommunity pharmacies offering OST may be an effective place for DOT of HCV treatment, but is likely only to benefit people who face significant challenges to adherence. We suggest that a positive pharmacist-patient relationship, high OST adherence, and commitment to reducing stigma in the pharmacy would be necessary for the intervention to be effective. Further research is needed to evaluate the expanded-role of community pharmacies in improving DAA adherence and eliminating HCV.     

UM171 promotes expansion of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells from poorly mobilizing lymphoma patients

BackgroundAutologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an effective therapeutic strategy for lymphoma patients. However, some patients have to give up receiving transplantation because of failing to obtain sufficient CD34⁺ cells yields. Therefore, we ex vivo expanded HSCs of lymphoma patients using UM171 to solve the problem of HSCs deficiency.MethodsMobilized peripheral blood-derived CD34⁺ cells from lymphoma patients were cultured for 10 days with or without UM171. The fold of cell expansion and the immunophenotype of expanded cells were assessed by flow cytometry. RNA-seq experiment was performed to identify the mechanism by which UM171 promoted HSCs expansion.ResultsUM171 treatment increased the proportion of CD34⁺ (68.97 ± 6.91%), CD34⁺ CD38⁻ cells (44.10 ± 9.20%) and CD34⁺CD38⁻CD45RA⁻CD90⁺ LT-HSCs (3.05 ± 2.08%) compared to vehicle treatment (36.08 ± 11.14%, 18.30 ± 9.49% and 0.56 ± 0.45%, respectively). UM171 treatment led to an 85.08-fold increase in LT-HSC numbers relative to initial cells. Importantly, UM171 promoted expansion of LT-HSCs achieved 138.57-fold in patients with poor mobilization. RNA-seq data showed that UM171 upregulated expression of HSC-, mast cell-specific genes and non-canonical Wnt signaling related genes, and inhibited genes expression of erythroid, megakaryocyte and inflammatory mediated chemokine.ConclusionsOur study shows that UM171 can efficiently promote ex vivo expansion of HSCs from lymphoma patients, especially for poorly mobilizing patients. In terms of mechanism, UM171 upregulate HSC-specific genes expression and suppress erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation, as well as activate non-classical Wnt signaling.     

Comparing the impact of Hydroxychloroquine based regimens and standard treatment on COVID-19 patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundPharmacological treatments including antivirals (Lopinavir/Ritonavir), Immuno-modulatory and anti-inflammatory drugs including, Tocilizumab and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been widely investigated as a treatment for COVID-19.Despite the ongoing controversies, HCQ was recommended for managing mild to moderate cases in Saudi Arabia . However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have been conducted in Saudi Arabia to assess its effectiveness.MethodsA hospital-based retrospective cohort study involving 161 patients with COVID-19 was conducted from March 1 to May 20, 2020. The study was conducted at Prince Mohammed bin Abdul Aziz Hospital (PMAH).The population included hospitalized adults (age ≥ 18 years) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Each eligible patient was followed from the time of admission until the time of discharge. Patients were classified into two groups according to treatment type: in the HCQ group, patients were treated with HCQ; in the SC group, patients were treated with other antiviral or antibacterial treatments according to Ministry of Health (MOH) protocols.The outcomes were hospitalization days, ICU admission, and the need for mechanical ventilation.We estimated the differences in hospital length of stay and time in the ICU between the HCQ group and the standard care (SC) group using a multivariate generalized linear regression. The differences in ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were compared via logistic regression. All models were adjusted for age and gender variables.ResultsA total of 161 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Approximately 59% (n = 95) received HCQ-based treatment, and 41% (n = 66) received SC. Length of hospital stay and time in ICU in for patients who received HCQ based treatment was shorter than those who received SC. Similarly, there was less need for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation among patients who received HCQ based treatment compared with SC, (8.6% vs. 10.7 and 3.1% vs. 9.1%). However, the regression analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient outcomes.ConclusionHCQ had a modest effect on hospital length stay and days in ICU compared with SC. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution. Larger observational studies and RCTs that evaluate the efficacy of HCQ in COVID-19 patients in the Saudi population are urgently needed.     

Safety and efficacy of Rituximab in systemic sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeRituximab is widely prescribed to treat systemic sclerosis (SSc) by the depletion of pathogenic B cells. Nonetheless, the clinical benefit of Rituximab in SSc remains contentious. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy profile of Rituximab in SSc patients.Patients and methodsWe performed a systematic online query in PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The available studies on the use of Rituximab in SSc patients were comprehensively reviewed and investigated.ResultsIn total, 14 studies, including 597 participants, were analyzed. Pooled results showed the long-term improvement in the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) for skin function (ΔmRSS: 7.00 at 6 months, 9.70 at 12 months, and 10.93 at 24 months), while forced vital capacity (FVC) (ΔFVC: −0.69 at 6 months, −2.62 at 12 months, and −0.67 at 24 months) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (ΔDLCO: −2.39 at 6 months, −3.28 at 12 months, and −0.79 at 24 months) for lung function remained stable in SSc patients after Rituximab treatment. The rate of Rituximab-related adverse events was 12% in the pooled results.ConclusionThe pooled results of this meta-analysis indicated that Rituximab is well tolerated, and it is able to improve cutaneous function and stabilize pulmonary function in SSc patients.     

Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among rheumatoid arthritis patients in Saudi Arabia

Background and aimThe use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is unexplored among Saudi rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and types of CAM used among patients with RA and factors associated with their use.Experimental procedureA cross-sectional study was conducted at rheumatology clinics in two tertiary hospitals located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The data was collected between May 2017 and February 2018. Unpaired Student's t-tests, Chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation tests were used to compare users vs nonusers.ResultsA total of 438 patients (mean age = 49, SD ± 15 years; 89.7% females) were included in this study. Sixty seven percent of included patients had used CAM for their RA. The majority of CAM users were female (92.1%). The most frequently used CAM products were vitamin D (47%), calcium (37%), honey (15%), ginger (13%), turmeric (11%), black seeds (8%), and fenugreek (8%). One hundred ninety-six (45%) patients believe that CAM is safe, and 287 (96%) patients took it because they believed that CAM had “added benefits”. Statistically significant differences were found for gender, RA duration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) level, and seropositivity between CAM users and nonusers (P = 0.019, P = 0.011, P = 0.022, and P < 0.0001, respectively). A significant correlation was found between the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) level, RA duration and CAM use (r = 0.110, P = 0.022 and r = 0.121, P = 0.012, respectively). These data indicated that patients who used CAM had higher ESR level and longer disease duration than patients didn’t use CAM.ConclusionThere is a high prevalence of CAM use among RA patients. CAM use was perceived to add benefit and patients using it had higher ESR. Larger studies are needed to assess the use of CAM and its impact on RA and its management.     

Therapeutic monitoring of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone after surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation-evaluation of the relationship between clinical effect and the serum concentration

BackgroundAssociation between clinical effect and serum concentration of amiodarone (AMI) and its active metabolite desethylamidarone (DEA) in patients after surgical ablation (SA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not yet been studied.AimsWe wanted to find a correlation between AMI and DEA serum concentration and maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) after SA of AF.MethodsSixty eight patients with AF who had undergone surgical ablation between 2014 and 2017 were included in a single-centre, prospective, observational study. Maintaining of SR was evaluated by standard 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring at months 1, 3, 6 and 12 following surgery. Therapeutic monitoring of AMI and DEA concentrations was done to optimize therapy and adverse effects were followed up.ResultsWe have noticed a high success rate in maintaining of SR (overall 83%). The median of serum concentration of AMI was 0.81 mg/L (range 0.16–2.35 mg/L) and DEA 0.70 mg/l (range 0.19–2.63 mg/L). No significant differences were found in the serum concentratration of AMI, DEA or DEA/AMI concentratration ratios between patients with SR and persistent supraventricular tachyarrhythmia except on the second outpatient visit. We observed significant correlation between serum concentration of DEA and thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation.ConclusionWe confirmed the efficacy of AMI and DEA at the measured serum concentrations. However, analysis of these concentrations alone cannot replace assessment of the clinical response for treatment. Establishment of individual AMI (and DEA) concentrations at which the optimal therapeutic response is achieved seems to be advantageous. Therapeutic monitoring of AMI and DEA is helpful in personalised pharmacotherapy after SA of AF.     

Comparison between standard Vs. Escalated dose venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A two centers,observational study

IntroductionThe risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 was found to be significantly higher in patients who experienced thromboembolic events. Thus, several guidelines recommend using prophylactic anticoagulants in all COVID-19 hospitalized patients. However, there is uncertainty about the appropriate dosing regimen and safety of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, this study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of standard versus escalated dose pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19.MethodsA two-center retrospective cohort study including critically ill patients aged ≥ 18-years with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at two tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia from March 1st, 2020, until January 31st, 2021. Patients who received either Enoxaparin 40 mg daily or Unfractionated heparin 5000 Units three times daily were grouped under the “standard dose VTE prophylaxis and patients who received higher than the standard dose but not as treatment dose were grouped under ”escalated VTE prophylaxis dose“. The primary outcome was the occurance of thrombotic events, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, mortality, and other ICU-related complications.ResultsA total of 758 patients were screened; 565 patients were included in the study. We matched 352 patients using propensity score matching (1:1). In patients who received escalated dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, any case of thrombosis and VTE were similar between the two groups (OR 1.22;95 %CI 0.52–2.86; P = 0.64 and OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.16–3.38; P = 0.70 respectively). However, the odds of minor bleeding was higher in patients who received escalated VTE prophylaxis dose (OR 3.39; 95% CI 1.08–10.61; P = 0.04). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality nor in-hospital mortality between the two groups (HR 1.17;95 %CI0.79–1.73; P = 0.43 and HR 1.08;95 %CI 0.76–1.53; P = 0.83, respectively).ConclusionEscalated-dose pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 was not associated with thrombosis, or mortality benefits but led to an increased risk of minor bleeding. This study supports previous evidence regarding the optimal dosing VTE pharmacological prophylaxis regimen for critically ill patients with COVID-19.     

Curative efficacy of purified serine protease inhibitor PTF3 from potato tuber in experimental visceral leishmaniasis

To overcome the drug toxicity and frequent resistance of parasites against the conventional drugs for the healing of human visceral leishmaniasis, innovative plant derived antileishmanial components are very imperative. Fuelled by the complications of clinically available antileishmanial drugs, a novel potato serine protease inhibitor was identified with its efficacy on experimental visceral leishmaniasis (VL). The serine protease inhibitors from potato tuber extract (PTEx) bearing molecular mass of 39 kDa (PTF1), 23 kDa (PTF2) and 17 kDa (PTF3) were purified and identified. Among them, PTF3 was selected as the most active inhibitor (IC₅₀ 143.5 ± 2.4 µg/ml) regarding its antileishmanial property. Again, intracellular amastigote load was reduced upto 83.1 ± 1.7% in pre-treated parasite and 88.5 ± 0.5% in in vivo model with effective dose of PTF3. Protective immune response by PTF3 was noted with increased production of antimicrobial substances and up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Therapeutic potency of PTF3 is also followed by 80% survival in infected hamster. The peptide mass fingerprint (MALDI-TOF) results showed similarity of PTF3 with serine protease inhibitors database. Altogether, these results strongly propose the effectiveness of PTF3 as potent immunomodulatory therapeutics for controlling VL.     

Application of the health Belief Model to assess community preventive practices against COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia

BackgroundThe novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has affected hundreds of thousands of people across more than 200 countries. As the pandemic continues, the health agencies, worldwide, are recommending strict preventive practices to avert its transmission at community scale. We sought to predict the behavior of the Saudi population for adopting community preventive practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsAn online questionnaire consisting of 22 items pertaining to the Health Belief Model constructs was used to measure the perceived susceptibility and perceived severity of contracting COVID-19, along with the perceived benefits and perceived barriers to follow the Ministry of Health’s recommendations. The outcome was assessed by their readiness to be compliant with the community protective measures. Data were analyzed using STATA at significance level of 0.05.ResultsA total of 900 individuals received the online survey link, of which 688 (response rate: 76.4%) respondents consented to participate in the study. The mean age of the respondents was 31.39 (SD = 8.94). Positive associations were observed between perceived susceptibility (Beta: 0.24; p value < 0.001), perceived severity (Beta: 0.16; p value < 0.001), perceived benefits (Beta: 0.41; p value < 0.001), cue to action (Beta: 2.61; p value < 0.001) and the participation in community preventive practices during the pandemic of the COVID-19.ConclusionsHealth belief model's constructs of perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and cue to action can be adopted to help strengthen COVID-19 limiting behaviors and prevention programs which can delivered through community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia as well as around the world.     

Influence of anti-thymocyte globulin plasma levels on outcome parameters in stem cell transplanted children

IntroductionAllogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative option for malignant and non-malignant pediatric diseases. Serotherapy is often employed to avoid graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) on one hand and graft rejection on the other hand. Therapeutic drug monitoring is increasingly used to allow for more precise dosing especially in pediatric patients due to their specific pharmacological characteristics. Application of T-cell directed antibodies is not routinely monitored, but may benefit from more precise dosing regimens.MethodsTwo different preparations of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), Thymoglobuline® and ATG-F (Grafalon®), are frequently used to prevent GvHD in pediatric patients by in vivo T-cell depletion. Total rATG levels and active rATG levels were analyzed prospectively in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. Clinical and laboratory outcome parameters were recorded.ResultsrATG levels were measured in 32 patients, 22 received thymoglobuline and 10 received ATG-F. The median total peak plasma level was 419.0 µg/ml for ATG-F and 60.4 µg/ml for thymoglobuline. For ATG-F, exposure could be predicted from the calculated dose more precisely than for thymoglobuline. Active peak plasma levels neither of ATG-F, nor of thymoglobuline correlated significantly with the number of lymphocytes prior to serotherapy. There was no significant difference in incidence of aGvHD, cGvHD, rejection, mixed chimerism or viral infections in the two cohorts. However, in our cohort, patients with high thymoglobuline exposure showed a compromised reconstitution of T cells.ConclusionsATG-F and thymoglobuline show different pharmacological and immunological impact in children, whose clinical significance needs to be investigated in larger cohorts.     

Investigation of the effects of different beverages on the disintegration time of over-the-counter medications in Saudi Arabia

Full disintegration of Oral solid dosage forms is critically important to achieve reliable clinical performance of the drug. Tablets/capsules are supposed to be taken with a full glass of water; however, many patients do not follow this recommendation as they administer their medications with beverages other than water. This study aims to assess the impact of different commonly consumed beverages in Saudi Arabia on the disintegration times of common over-the-counter (OTC) medication tablets and capsules in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Five immediate release OTC drugs were chosen: Fevadol®, Solpadeine®, Ralaxon®, Artiz ®, and Brufen®. The disintegration times of these medications were assessed using a disintegration test in five beverages: Coca-cola, arabic coffee, orange juice, buttermilk and an energy drink. Times were compared to the disintegration time in water under two temperature conditions (37 °C and 5 °C). All beverages significantly increased the disintegration times of fevadol, solpadeine, and relaxon in comparison with water. The same was found for burfen, except that arabic coffee did not significantly increase disintegration time (p > 0.05). The disintegration time of artiz tablets was also significantly influenced by all beverages, except for Coca-cola and the energy drink, which had no significant impact on the disintegration time. The tested beverages should not be used as substitutes for water when ingesting medications. Patients should be advised to avoid consuming beverages other than water with therapeutic products. Increasing public awareness of drug-beverage interactions is needed.     

The evaluation of adverse drug reactions in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective observational study

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the type, severity, seriousness, reasons, and outcomes of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the reports submitted to the regional spontaneous ADR database.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted to analyze all the Tabuk Health Affairs hospitals in Saudi Arabia submitted to SFDA from January 2020 to December 2020. The database was structured according to the Saudi ADR form’s fields. The Naranjo algorithm was used to assess the causes of the ADRs (sFDA, 2022).ResultsFor 1 year, 2,349 ADR reports, along with 242 suspected drugs for 4,114 reactions, were submitted to SFDA. We found more males than females had ADRs (56.1% vs. 43.8%, P < 0.05).Antimicrobial drugs (26.9%), hematologic drugs (19.7%), and neuropsychiatric drugs (12.9%) were responsible for most ADRs. Most of the reactions were associated with the use of ciprofloxacin (7.7%), followed by the combination of lopinavir and ritonavir (4.1%). Two deaths resulted from salbutamol and cefazolin use. Based on the results of the Naranjo assessment of causality, cardiovascular events (9.9%) exhibited the highest score (≥9) for a causal relationship with the suspected drugs, followed by dermatological events (9.5%).ConclusionsThe spontaneous report database is an important and valuable source of aftermarket authorization safety information. In our study, most drugs used as antimicrobial, cardiovascular, and hematologic therapies were associated with a higher risk of developing severe and serious events. We recommend monitoring and using medications optimally to ensure patient safety.     

Impact of Docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on proinflammatory cytokines release and the development of Necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm Neonates: A randomized controlled study

IntroductionPreterm neonates have under-developed immune-regulatory system; consequently, there is a risk for developing chronic inflammation. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an acute devastating neonatal intestinal inflammatory disorder. Due to the obscure multifactorial etiology, early diagnosis and effective treatment of NEC are limited. Consequently, effective strategies in the prevention of NEC, including nutritional approaches, are critically needed. The current study was conducted to assess the potential immunomodulatory effect of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) supplementation in preterm neonates at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and subsequently its effect on preventing or reducing NEC incidence.MethodsThis was a prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 67 neonates, with gestational age equal or less than 32 weeks at birth and weight less than or equal 1500 g, were randomly assigned to either DHA group or the control group. Modified Bell’s staging criteria for NEC was used as an objective tool for diagnosis and staging of NEC. Levels of Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) were measured at baseline and after 10 days. Mortality and NICU length of stay (LOS) were also monitored.ResultsThirty neonates of each group completed the study. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding diagnosis and staging of NEC (p = 0.0001). There was also a statistically significant difference between DHA group 22(73.3), 95% CI [55.9, 86.5] and the control group 8 (26.7), 95% CI [13.5, 44.1] in the percentage change in IL-1β levels (p = 0.0001).A statistically significant association was found between IL and 1 β change and NEC diagnosis (p = 0.001). NICU LOS was significantly lower among DHA group 21.63 ± 6.67 compared to the control group 25.07 ± 4.67 (p = 0.025). Mortality n (%) among the control group 4 (11.8) was higher than DHA group 3 (9.1), however, no significant difference was detected (p = 1.0).ConclusionFindings of this study suggest that enteral DHA supplementation can reduce NEC incidence in preterm neonates through its immunoregulatory effect that modulates production of regulatory cytokines.Trial registration: Registered at clinical trials.gov (NCT03700957), 6 October 2018.