New agents for the treatment of systemic fungal infections--current status

Systemic antifungal chemotherapy is enjoying its most dynamic era. More antifungal agents are under development than ever before, including agents in entirely new classes. Major goals of current investigations are to identify compounds with a wide spectrum of activity, minimal toxicity and a high degree of target specificity. The antifungal drugs in development include new azoles {voriconazole, posaconazole (formerly SCH-56592), ravuconazole (formerly BMS-207147)}, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, a lipid formulation of nystatin, echinocandins {anidulafungin (formerly, LY-303366, VER-002), caspofungin (formerly MK-991), micafungin (formerly FK-463)}, antifungal peptides other than echinocandins, and sordarin derivatives. This discussion reviews the currently available antifungal agents and summarises the developmental issues that surround these new systemic antifungal drugs.     

Newer triazole antifungal agents: pharmacology,spectrum, clinical efficacy and limitations

New triazole antifungals (voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole and albaconazole) have been developed to meet the increasing need for new antifungals, and address the rising incidence of invasive fungal infections and the emergence of fungal resistance. This report describes the spectrum of activity of the newer-generation triazoles based on data from in vitro, animal and clinical studies. The authors discuss the use of these agents in combination with other antifungals, the extent of cross-resistance, their toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic properties. A total of two agents are currently available: voriconazole (which is becoming a primary treatment for the management of invasive aspergillosis) and posaconazole (which demonstrates a broad antifungal spectrum). A further two agents, albaconazole and ravuconazole, are undergoing early clinical evaluation and their future is uncertain. For all newer triazoles, concerns about emerging drug-resistant fungi and the incidence and management of breakthrough infections will dictate their role in antifungal prophylaxis and treatment.     

Newer triazole antifungal agents: pharmacology, spectrum, clinical efficacy and limitations

New triazole antifungals (voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole and albaconazole) have been developed to meet the increasing need for new antifungals, and address the rising incidence of invasive fungal infections and the emergence of fungal resistance. This report describes the spectrum of activity of the newer-generation triazoles based on data from in vitro, animal and clinical studies. The authors discuss the use of these agents in combination with other antifungals, the extent of cross-resistance, their toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic properties. A total of two agents are currently available: voriconazole (which is becoming a primary treatment for the management of invasive aspergillosis) and posaconazole (which demonstrates a broad antifungal spectrum). A further two agents, albaconazole and ravuconazole, are undergoing early clinical evaluation and their future is uncertain. For all newer triazoles, concerns about emerging drug-resistant fungi and the incidence and management of breakthrough infections will dictate their role in antifungal prophylaxis and treatment.     

New generation azole antifungals in clinical investigation

Considerable progress in treating systemic mycoses has been achieved in the past years through development of new drugs in association with more advanced diagnostic procedures. Here, we review the pharmacological, microbiological and clinical development progress with the so-called ‘second generation’ triazoles: voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, isavuconazole and albaconazole. All these drugs exhibit a favourable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile and possess high activity against resistant and emerging pathogens. However, only voriconazole and posaconazole have been adequately investigated in Phase III studies and have been approved by the regulatory agencies in the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections, respectively. On the contrary, ravuconazole, isavuconazole and albaconazole have not been investigated in adequate clinical trials and, in the absence of proper data, the real possibilities of these agents as competitors for the treatment and prevention of invasive mycoses in the clinical setting are still unknown. The drug interactions and the variability in the absorption and/or metabolism of the triazoles, in particular voriconazole and posaconazole, may determine an unpredictable exposure of the pathogens to the antifungal treatments. Literature evidences strongly support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for these triazoles which may be crucial for the proper management of severe invasive fungal infections.     

New investigational antifungal agents for treating invasive fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections have been recognised as a major cause of morbidity and mortality during the last two decades. There are only a few therapeutic options for these infections. Severe toxicity, such as impairment of renal function, limits the use of amphotericin B. Flucytosine is associated with side effects and drug resistance. Fluconazole and itraconazole are safer, though emergence of resistance and innate resistance in some fungal pathogens is a concern in their use. Therefore, there is a need for developing novel drugs and/or treatment strategies to combat these infections. In recent years, increased efforts by the pharmaceutical industry and academia have led to the discovery of new re-engineered or reconsidered antifungal agents that are more efficacious, safer and have a broad spectrum of activity. Lipid formulations of polyene antifungal agents, amphotericin B and nystatin, have the advantage of improved therapeutic index. Activity against resistant fungi, high bioavailability, safety and longer half-life are the properties that encourage development of the newer triazoles (e.g., voriconazole, ravuconazole and posaconazole). Echinocandin-like lipopeptide antibiotics are among the antifungal agents with a novel mode of action. In addition to these lead investigational compounds, development of newer antifungal agents is underway.     

New investigational antifungal agents for treating invasive fungal infections

Systemic fungal infections have been recognised as a major cause of morbidity and mortality during the last two decades. There are only a few therapeutic options for these infections. Severe toxicity, such as impairment of renal function, limits the use of amphotericin B. Flucytosine is associated with side effects and drug resistance. Fluconazole and itraconazole are safer, though emergence of resistance and innate resistance in some fungal pathogens is a concern in their use. Therefore, there is a need for developing novel drugs and/or treatment strategies to combat these infections. In recent years, increased efforts by the pharmaceutical industry and academia have led to the discovery of new re-engineered or reconsidered antifungal agents that are more efficacious, safer and have a broad spectrum of activity. Lipid formulations of polyene antifungal agents, amphotericin B and nystatin, have the advantage of improved therapeutic index. Activity against resistant fungi, high bioavailability, safety and longer half-life are the properties that encourage development of the newer triazoles (e.g., voriconazole, ravuconazole and posaconazole). Echinocandin-like lipopeptide antibiotics are among the antifungal agents with a novel mode of action. In addition to these lead investigational compounds, development of newer antifungal agents is underway.     

Clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Management of fungal infections

Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite remarkable progress in mycology, many uncertainties and difficulties remain. Invasive fungal infections are difficult to diagnose. Noninvasive, rapid diagnostic tools, such as the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in serum or of fungal nucleic acids by molecular methods are promising, but are still under investigation. The other difficulty in diagnosis is the lack of standard, consistent criteria. Very recently, diagnostic criteria based on host factors, as well as clinical features and microbiological results, have been proposed. Treatment of invasive fungal infections is also problematic. The development of novel antifungal compounds constitutes a major advance in antifungal therapy. These include novel azoles such as voriconazole (Pfizer), posaconazole (Schering- Plough), and ravuconazole (Eisai/Bristol-Myers Squibb), and novel echinocandins such as caspofungin (Merck), anidulafungin (Eli Lilly), and micafungin (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical). These agents appear more efficacious and less toxic than currently available antifungal drugs. However, immune status of the host remains one of the major determinants of clinical outcome. This property limits the efficiency of in vitro antifungal susceptibility tests in predicting in vivo outcome. Using immune system modifiers such as cytokines in combination with antifungal agents is beneficial in the improvement of immune status, and thus clinical outcome.     

Novel triazole antifungal agents

The risk of opportunistic infections is greatly increased in patients who are immunocompromised due to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy and organ or bone marrow transplantation. Candida albicans is often associated with serious systemic fungal infections, however other Candida species such as Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata, as well as Cryptococcus neoformans and filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus, have also emerged as clinically significant fungal pathogens. Two triazole antifungal agents, fluconazole and itraconazole, were introduced over a decade ago and since then have been used extensively for the prophylaxis and treatment of a variety of fungal infections. Although both drugs are effective and have their place in therapy, limitations regarding the utility of these agents do exist. For example, fluconazole is not effective for the prophylaxis or treatment of Aspergillus species and has limited activity against C. krusei and C. glabrata. The use of itraconazole has been limited secondary to concerns regarding unpredictable bioavailability. The rising incidence of fungal infections and the reported increase of non-albicans candidal infections noted over the past two decades highlight the need for new antifungal agents with improved spectra of activity. Several new triazole agents are in various phases of preclinical and clinical trials and may be available for human use in the near future. Three such agents voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole are reviewed and compared with existing agents.     

Novel triazole antifungal agents

The risk of opportunistic infections is greatly increased in patients who are immunocompromised due to AIDS, cancer chemotherapy and organ or bone marrow transplantation. Candida albicans is often associated with serious systemic fungal infections, however other Candida species such as Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata, as well as Cryptococcus neoformans and filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus, have also emerged as clinically significant fungal pathogens. Two triazole antifungal agents, fluconazole and itraconazole, were introduced over a decade ago and since then have been used extensively for the prophylaxis and treatment of a variety of fungal infections. Although both drugs are effective and have their place in therapy, limitations regarding the utility of these agents do exist. For example, fluconazole is not effective for the prophylaxis or treatment of Aspergillus species and has limited activity against C. krusei and C. glabrata. The use of itraconazole has been limited secondary to concerns regarding unpredictable bioavailability. The rising incidence of fungal infections and the reported increase of non-albicans candidal infections noted over the past two decades highlight the need for new antifungal agents with improved spectra of activity. Several new triazole agents are in various phases of preclinical and clinical trials and may be available for human use in the near future. Three such agents voriconazole, posaconazole and ravuconazole are reviewed and compared with existing agents.     

Human mycoses and advances in antifungal therapy

The 11th Focus on Fungal Infections meeting was held in Washington, D.C., U.S.A., March 1416, 2001. At the conference, there were well-attended sessions that focused on the pathogenesis and therapy of fungal disease. This report focuses on new information on fungal incidence and pathogenesis as well as on the in vitro and clinical experience of established antifungal drugs (fluconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, liposomal formulations of amphotericin B, terbinafine) and the newer antifungal compounds approved for use (e.g., caspofungin) and in development (the new-generation azoles: voriconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, and the candins, micafungin and anidulafungin).     

Systemic antifungal therapy: new options, new challenges

The frequency of invasive fungal infections has increased dramatically in recent decades because of an expanding population at risk. Until now, treatment options for invasive mycoses have been primarily amphotericin B and the azoles, fluconazole and itraconazole. Traditional agents are limited by an inadequate spectrum of activity, drug resistance, toxicities, and drug-drug interactions. The recent approval of caspofungin and voriconazole clearly has expanded the number of existing antifungal drugs available. However, the enthusiasm that accompanies their availability is counterbalanced by limited clinical experience, high drug acquisition costs, and distinctive toxicities. The pharmacologic characteristics, extent of clinical experience (efficacy and toxicity), and drug acquisition costs among available systemic antifungal agents are compared, with emphasis on the new agents. Also, recommendations on the role of each agent are provided according to the most common indications for systemic antifungal therapy: invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, and febrile neutropenia.     

New developments in chemotherapy for non-invasive fungal infections

Dermatomycosis and subcutaneous mycosis comprise the non-invasive fungal infections commonly encountered in clinical practice around the world. The limited activity of early topical antifungal agents prompted the development of more effective systemic agents. While griseofulvin has been used for more than four decades, the use of early azoles, such as ketoconazole have resulted in better patient compliance and thus greater success. However, poor response and recurrence in dermatomycosis, as well as toxicity associated with ketoconazole therapy, has led to the search for newer antifungal agents and more effective treatment strategies. Terbinafine, itraconazole and fluconazole have the advantage of non-toxicity and a broad spectrum of activity. An overview of non-invasive fungal infections, antifungal agents in clinical use and recent developments in antifungal therapy is reviewed in this article.     

Antifungal agents in neonates: issues and recommendations

Fungal infections are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period, particularly among premature neonates. Four classes of antifungal agents are commonly used in the treatment of fungal infections in pediatric patients: polyene macrolides, fluorinated pyrimidines, triazoles, and echinocandins. Due to the paucity of pediatric data, many recommendations for the use of antifungal agents in this population are derived from the experience in adults. The purpose of this article was to review the published data on fungal infections and antifungal agents, with a focus on neonatal patients, and to provide an overview of the differences in antifungal pharmacology in neonates compared with adults. Pharmacokinetic data suggest dosing differences in children versus adult patients with some antifungals, but not all agents have been fully evaluated. The available pharmacokinetic data on the amphotericin B deoxycholate formulation in neonates exhibit considerable variability; nevertheless, the dosage regimen suggested in the neonatal population is similar to that used in adults. More pharmacokinetic information is available on the liposomal and lipid complex preparations of amphotericin B and fluconazole, and it supports their use in neonates; however, the optimal dosage and duration of therapy is difficult to establish. All amphotericin-B formulations, frequently used in combination with flucytosine, are useful for treating disseminated fungal infections and Candida meningitis in neonates. Fluconazole, with potent in vitro activity against Cryptococcus neoformans and almost all Candida spp., has been used in neonates with invasive candidiasis at dosages of 6 mg/kg/day, and for antifungal prophylaxis in high-risk neonates. There are limited data on itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole use in neonates. Caspofungin, which is active against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., requires higher doses in children relative to adults, and dosing is best accomplished based on body surface area. Micafungin shows a clear trend toward lower levels in the smallest patients. There are no data on the use of other new antifungal drugs (ravuconazole and anidulafungin) in neonates. In summary, the initial data suggest dosage differences in neonates for some antifungal agents, although the newer agents have not been fully tested for optimal administration in these patients.     

Voriconazole: A second-generation triazole

Voriconazole, a derivative of fluconazole, is an antifungal triazole with expanded spectrum of activity against a variety of yeasts and filamentous fungi. It exhibits fungicidal activity against Aspergillus species. Preliminary data from animal models and clinical trials show promise in the treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis. Of concern is the development of resistance to voriconazole and cross-resistance with other azoles. Voriconazole is a welcome addition to our limited armamentarium against potentially fatal fungal infections. (c) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved.     

Antifungal drugs in pregnancy: a review

The use of any medication in pregnant women requires careful consideration of benefit to the mother versus risk posed to the fetus. Fungal infections are not uncommon in pregnant women; in fact, the incidence of certain infections such as Candida vaginitis is increased in this patient population. A variety of antimycotic agents are currently available to treat systemic or mucocutaneous fungal infections. Many of these agents are capable of penetrating the placental barrier and entering fetal cord blood, therefore adverse effects of these agents on the fetus are a valid concern. The use of topical azoles for the treatment of superficial fungal infections is safe and efficacious. However, there are some data suggesting a dose-related increase in the risk of teratogenicity associated with the use of systemic azoles. Amphotericin B remains the drug of choice for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in pregnancy. There are serious risks of fetal malformations associated with the use of griseofulvin, ketoconazole, voriconazole, flucytosine and potassium iodide. These drugs are contraindicated in pregnancy. There are insufficient data regarding the use of caspofungin in pregnancy. This article will review available data regarding the safety of antifungal drug use in pregnant women.     

Antifungal drugs in pregnancy: a review

The use of any medication in pregnant women requires careful consideration of benefit to the mother versus risk posed to the fetus. Fungal infections are not uncommon in pregnant women; in fact, the incidence of certain infections such as Candida vaginitis is increased in this patient population. A variety of antimycotic agents are currently available to treat systemic or mucocutaneous fungal infections. Many of these agents are capable of penetrating the placental barrier and entering fetal cord blood, therefore adverse effects of these agents on the fetus are a valid concern. The use of topical azoles for the treatment of superficial fungal infections is safe and efficacious. However, there are some data suggesting a dose-related increase in the risk of teratogenicity associated with the use of systemic azoles. Amphotericin B remains the drug of choice for the treatment of systemic fungal infections in pregnancy. There are serious risks of fetal malformations associated with the use of griseofulvin, ketoconazole, voriconazole, flucytosine and potassium iodide. These drugs are contraindicated in pregnancy. There are insufficient data regarding the use of caspofungin in pregnancy. This article will review available data regarding the safety of antifungal drug use in pregnant women.     

Recent advances in antifungal drug development targeting lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51): A comprehensive review with structural and molecular insights

Fungal infections are posing serious threat to healthcare system due to emerging resistance among available antifungal agents. Among available antifungal agents in clinical practice, azoles (diazole, 1,2,4-triazole and tetrazole) remained most effective and widely prescribed antifungal agents. Now their associated side effects and emerging resistance pattern raised a need of new and potent antifungal agents. Lanosterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) is responsible for the oxidative removal of 14α-methyl group of sterol precursors lanosterol and 24(28)-methylene-24,25-dihydrolanosterol in ergosterol biosynthesis hence an essential component of fungal life cycle and prominent target for antifungal drug development. This review will shed light on various azole- as well as non-azoles-based derivatives as potential antifungal agents that target fungal CYP51. Review will provide deep insight about structure activity relationship, pharmacological outcomes, and interactions of derivatives with CYP51 at molecular level. It will help medicinal chemists working on antifungal development in designing more rational, potent, and safer antifungal agents by targeting fungal CYP51 for tackling emerging antifungal drug resistance.     

Systemic antifungal agents against AIDS-related opportunistic infections: current status and emerging drugs in development.

No effective drug was available for the treatment of systemic fungal infections until the discovery of Amphotericin B in 1953. Since then flucytosine, azoles and later the triazoles, have now become available. The current interest in the development of new antifungal agents can partially be explained by the dramatic rise in the number of AIDS cases and the subsequent suppression of the immune system in patients with the disease. For example, over 90% of those diagnosed to be HIV-positive contract a fungal infection during the course of their illness. Other conditions that have spurred the development of new systemic antifungal agents include the increase in the frequency of bone marrow and organ transplants, the use of antineoplastic agents, long-term use of corticosteroids and even the indiscriminate use of antibiotics. The emergence of fungi resistant to currently available agents, especially the azoles, has made the need for new and effective antifungal agents more urgent. This review article focuses on agents targeted against opportunistic fungal infections, i.e., fungal infections which, in contrast to immunocompetent individuals, may cause serious life-threatening illness in immunocompromised individuals. Agents currently on the market or undergoing clinical development, as well as potential new agents that have been discovered, are discussed.     

Changing epidemiology of rare mould infections: implications for therapy

There has been an increase in rare mould infections in recent decades. These infections have been reported primarily in severely immunocompromised patients. The emergence of these organisms is multifactorial and can be related to more intense immunosuppression, the prolonged survival of patients who have what were previously fatal diseases, and the selective pressure of broad spectrum antifungal agents used for prophylaxis or therapy. Among these rare mould infections, the Zygomycetes are the most commonly encountered, and in some institutions the increase in these organisms appears to be associated with the use of voriconazole. Aspergillus terreus, a species that is resistant to amphotericin B, and less frequently, A. ustus and A. lentulus, have been noted increasingly as causes of invasive aspergillosis in tertiary care centres in the US. Several species of Scedosporium with innate resistance to many antifungal agents have emerged as major causes of disseminated mould infections that are frequently very difficult to treat. Among patients who have haematological malignancies, are neutropenic or have received a haematopoietic stem cell transplant, infections due to Fusarium species respond poorly to many antifungal agents. Dematiaceous, or brown-black, fungi, most often associated with chronic localised infections, are now increasingly reported as a cause of disseminated infection in immunosuppressed hosts.Concomitant with the increased number of infections with these rare moulds, several new mould-active antifungal agents have been developed. The new expanded spectrum azole, voriconazole, has changed our approach to moulds such as S.apiospermum, Fusarium species and A. terreus that are amphotericin B resistant. Posaconazole, the most recently approved expanded spectrum azole, is the first drug in the azole class to show activity against the Zygomycetes and has proven extremely useful for step-down therapy after initial treatment with amphotericin B. It is not known whether posaconazole is effective as primary therapy for zygomycosis; the use of this agent for that purpose awaits clinical trials with the recently developed intravenous formulation of posaconazole.     

Empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia

Invasive fungal infections, most commonly candidiasis or aspergillosis, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with neutropenia. Difficulty in diagnosing invasive fungal infections in these patients complicates decisions regarding pharmacotherapy. Because of the difficult diagnosis and the significant morbidity and mortality of fungal infections in patients with neutropenia, systemic antifungal agents are used as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia who are not responding to antibacterial therapy. The pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections has evolved rapidly within the past several years as numerous antifungal agents--different formulations of amphotericin B, azoles, and echinocandins--have become available for use as empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia. Various levels of evidence support the use of these agents for this indication. Their use is limited, however, by drug intolerance, drug interactions, adverse-event profiles, and limited activity with some mold species. Thus, considerations for selecting an antifungal drug for empiric use in patients with febrile neutropenia should include the epidemiology of fungal infections in the individual patient's institution and the specific clinical circumstances of the patient.