Coronary artery disease in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

Selective coronary angiography to determine the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been performed in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Thirty patients in this series consisted of 26 men and 4 women with an age range of 48-87 years (mean +/- SD: 67.5 +/- 8.2 years). As the atherosclerotic risk factors, cigarette smoking was present in 19 patients (63.3%), hypertension was in 18 (60%), hypercholesteremia was in 10 (33.3%), and diabetes mellitus was in 2 (6.7%). Cerebral vascular disease was present in 11 patients (36.7%). Regarding CAD, angina pectoris or old myocardial infarction was found in 9 patients (30%), and abnormal electrocardiography (ECG) was in 16 patients (53.3%). Coronary angiography prior to operation of AAA was performed to 22 patients (73.3%), and 15 patients (68.2%) among them had significant coronary artery stenosis, and 9 patients underwent myocardial revascularization (4 CABG, 5 PTCA). CAD was frequently complicated both in patients without symptoms or ECG abnormalities and in less than 65-year patients. In order to prevent fatal myocardial infarction, we recommend routine coronary angiography to patients with AAA. And if necessary, myocardial revascularization must be indicated prior to aneurysmectomy.     

Higher prevalence of obstructive airway disease in patients with thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The risk factors of aortic aneurysm (AA) are comparable with those described for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study was performed to determine whether patients with AA have a higher than average prevalence of obstructive airway disease. METHODS: We performed pulmonary function tests in 240 consecutive patients (182 men and 58 women; age, 70 +/- 10 years) with thoracic or abdominal AA. The results were compared with those in individuals without obvious cardiovascular disease (control) and in patients with coronary artery disease who were matched for age, gender, smoking status, and other atherosclerotic risk factors. RESULTS: Patients in the AA group had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (%) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (%/predicted value) than did the control group (P <.01). The proportion of patients with airway obstruction, defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity of 70% or less, was higher in the AA group (100/240; 42%) than in the control (51/223; 23%) and coronary artery disease (43/238; 18%) groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis results revealed that the presence of an AA and male gender were associated with a higher risk of airway obstruction (odds ratio, 2.928; 95% CI, 1.722 to 4.979; and odds ratio, 1.622; 95% CI, 1.055 to 2.493, respectively). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that AA may be a risk factor indicative of the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A higher prevalence of depressed pulmonary function should be suspected as a preoperative risk in presence of thoracic or abdominal AA as compared with other types of cardiovascular disorders.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with occlusive peripheral vascular disease

Over a 1-year period, 242 patients with peripheral vascular disease underwent abdominal ultrasonography to detect the presence of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. In 34 (14 per cent) an abdominal aortic aneurysm was found; half of these aneurysms were greater than 4 cm in diameter. In addition, 16 patients had ectatic aortas. Abdominal aortic aneurysms were more common in men than in women (17 versus 8 per cent). Patients with claudication were as likely to have an abdominal aortic aneurysm as those with rest pain or gangrene. The presence of aortoiliac occlusive disease increased the chance of an aneurysm being present (P less than 0.02). Patients with occlusive peripheral vascular disease are a high-risk group with regard to the development of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients with proximal occlusive disease represent a subgroup at even higher risk.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery disease

Background: The Asian population is believed to have lower incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and hence, the benefit of screening is uncertain. The size of native aorta in Asians, which shall affect the definition of AAA, has also never been reported. Our study investigated the prevalence of AAA and the infra‐renal aortic diameter (AD) in Chinese patients with severe coronary artery disease. Methods: This is a prospective observational study of infra‐renal aortic size for patients who had coronary artery bypass surgery by ultrasound. The patients' demographics, important co‐morbidities and maximum AD were recorded. Results: The study included 624 consecutive Chinese patients (mean age = 63.2 years). The mean maximum infra‐renal AD was 17.5 mm for men and 14.8 mm for women. The presence of AAA was defined as maximum AD greater than 30 mm. The result was also compared with an alternate definition that defines AAA as maximum AD of greater than 1.5 times of the group's mean. Eleven patients had an AD greater than 30 mm, and the prevalence of AAA was only 1.8%. With AAA defined as maximum AD of 1.5 times greater than the group's mean, 19 patients had AAA. The prevalence of AAA in this high‐risk group would become 3% overall. Conclusion: The prevalence of AAA in Chinese patients was low, and the result did not support routine screening. The smaller mean infra‐renal AD in Chinese merits validation by large‐scale study and consideration when deciding threshold for small AAA repair in our locality.     

Isolated iliac artery aneurysms in patients with or without previous abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Isolated iliac artery aneurysms (IAA) in patients with or without previous abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are rare. We wanted to compare the presentation, distribution, treatment, outcome and patterns of subsequent aneurysm formation in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with isolated IAA over a 10-year period. Patients with primary isolated IAA (group 1) were compared with patients who presented with IAA after previous AAA repair (group 2). RESULTS: There were 23 patients in each group. Demographics and comorbidities were similar. No aneurysms were detected outside of the iliac system in group 1; 22% of patients in group 2 had other aneurysms. The mean time after AAA repair to IAA diagnosis was 8.8 +/- 3.2 years for operated on patients. The in-hospital mortality was 0% for elective cases and 50% for emergency cases for both groups. Three patients in group 2 (13%) developed new aneurysms during follow-up, whereas the only new aneurysm in group 1 was a contralateral IAA. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with new IAA after AAA repair have a greater tendency to develop further aneurysms in other sites, synchronously or metachronously. The time to detection of new IAA after AAA repair is at least 5 years in most cases. In both groups, a quarter to a third of patients present with rupture, with a resultant mortality of 30% to 50%, whereas those operated on electively have minimal morbidity and almost no mortality.     

High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in men with peripheral vascular disease: screening by ultrasonography

A study was carried out to see if an ultrasonic examination of the abdominal aorta was indicated in every patient who attended an outpatient clinic with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). One hundred consecutive patients were studied and compared with a control group. The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the control group was 2 per cent. In the study group, the male patients had an incidence of 20 per cent of aneurysm and ectasia, while the female patients had an incidence of 12 per cent. Of all the abnormal aortas found by ultrasound, only 31 per cent were palpable clinically. Two aneurysms that required operation were found, while the remainder are to be followed by regular ultrasound assessment. Further studies are necessary to conclude if screening of a high risk group, such as patients with PVD, is worthwhile.     

High prevalence of mild hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE: In vitro studies have recently demonstrated that homocysteine interacts with the aortic wall by inducing both elastolysis and endothelial perturbation. The aim of this study was to evaluate homocysteine plasma levels and their relationships with aortic diameter and endothelial damage in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.Subjects and Methods: Fifty-eight consecutive male patients (mean age, 69.5 +/- 6.6 years; age range, 49-78 years) who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery were enrolled in the study. Twenty-two of 58 patients had no clinical or instrumental evidence of atherosclerosis. Sixty control subjects were age matched and sex matched with the patients. In all of the subjects, we evaluated total homocysteine and thrombomodulin plasma levels and the distribution of the C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene mutation. RESULTS: Hyperhomocysteinemia was found in 26 (48%) of the 58 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, and homocysteine plasma levels were significantly higher in patients than in control subjects (15.7 +/- 6.5 micromol/L vs 9.6 +/- 3.9 micromol/L; P <. 0001). In addition, the subgroup of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who did not show evidence of atherosclerosis showed homocysteine plasma levels significantly higher than those in the controls (14.8 +/- 6.1 micromol/L vs 9.6 +/- 3.9 micromol/L; P <. 001). A larger aneurysmal size was detected in hyperhomocysteinemic patients than in those with normal homocysteine plasma levels (5.09 +/- 0.84 cm vs 5.79 +/- 1.5 cm; P <.05). The genotype distribution of the C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase mutation was as follows: TT 21%, TC 55%, and CC 24% in the patients; TT 10%, TC 58%, and CC 32% in the controls. Moreover, in patients a significant correlation (P <.005) between homocysteine plasma level and 677TT methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotype was found. Thrombomodulin plasma levels were significantly higher (P <.00005) in patients (median, 30 ng/mL; range, 10-164 ng/mL) than in controls (median, 19 ng/mL; range, 13-44 ng/mL), and thrombomodulin levels were significantly higher (P <.005) in hyperhomocysteinemic patients (median, 39.5 ng/mL; range, 15-164 ng/mL) than in normohomocysteinemic patients (median, 27.5 ng/mL; range, 10-85 ng/mL). In addition, in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm, a direct significant correlation (P <.005) was found between homocysteine and thrombomodulin. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate an association between the presence of AAA in patients selected for surgical treatment of AAA and elevated homocysteine plasma levels and suggest that homocysteine may induce endothelial perturbation and stimulation in these patients.     

Incision and abdominal wall hernias in patients with aneurysm or occlusive aortic disease

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing midline incision for abdominal aortic reconstruction appear to be at greater risk for postoperative incision hernia compared with patients undergoing celiotomy for general surgical procedures. Controversy exists as to whether incidence of abdominal wall hernia and increased risk for incision hernia is higher in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) than in patients operated on because of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AOD). We conducted a prospective multi-institutional study to assess frequency of incision hernia after aortic surgery through a midline laparotomy and of previous abdominal wall hernia. METHODS: Patients with AAA (n = 177) or AOD (n = 82) from three major institutions were prospectively enrolled in the study and examined. Data collected included demographic data, cardiopulmonary risk factors, smoking status, history of previous or current abdominal wall hernia (incision, inguinal, umbilical, femoral), previous midline incision, suture type, and postoperative complications. At a minimum of 6 months after laparotomy, patients were evaluated clinically for a new incision hernia. Differences were tested with the unpaired t test, X(2) test, or Fisher exact test, and multiple logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables. RESULTS: Mean follow-up of the cohort was 32.8 +/- 2.3 months. Rate of abdominal wall hernia and inguinal hernia in patients with AAA versus AOD was 38.4% versus 11% (P =.001) and 23.7% versus 6.1% (P =.003), respectively. Rate of postoperative incision hernia in patients with AAA was 28.2%, and in patients with AOD was 11.0% (P =.002). Adjusting for age, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, diabetes, bowel obstruction, and suture type, patients with AAA had almost a ninefold risk for postoperative incision hernia formation (odds ratio [OR], 8.8; P =.0049). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients with AOD, patients with AAA have a higher frequency of abdominal wall hernia and inguinal hernia, and are at significant increased risk for development of incision hernia postoperatively. The higher frequency of hernia formation in patients with AAA suggests the presence of a structural defect within the fascia. Further studies are needed to delineate the molecular changes of the aorta and its relation to the abdominal wall fascia.     

Coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: detection and treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: Complication due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality in the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose was to show 1) the incidence of patients who required coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and 2) risk factors for the necessity of CABG in patients with AAA. METHODS: Subjects were consecutive 159 patients (132 males and 27 females) undergoing elective repair of non-ruptured AAA between May 1993 and March 2002. Most patients (n=145) underwent routine preoperative coronary angiography (CAG) and received coronary revascularization when necessary. Clinical atherosclerotic risk factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis to determine predictors for the necessity of CABG. RESULTS: Of 43 patients (27.0%) with significant coronary stenosis, 7 patients (4.4%) underwent CABG concomitantly (n=1) or prior to the AAA repair (n=6) in the same admission. Other patients received percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (n=14) and isolated medical treatment (n=22). Overall mortality of 159 patients undergoing AAA repair was 2.5% and there were no deaths in 7 patients undergoing CABG. Univariate and multivariate analysis indicated only the history of angina as significant for the necessity of CABG in patients with AAA. Of 155 survivors, 5 patients underwent CABG later in the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of patients who required CABG in the treatment of AAA was 4.4% in our institute. It was difficult to predict the necessity of CABG without conducting CAG in patients with asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. These results may justify the routine enforcement of preoperative CAG in patients with AAA.     

The prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm and concomitant coronary artery disease

Patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are at increased risk for cardiovascular complications such as cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Dobutamine stress echocardiography is an established, cost-effective technique for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This review will focus on the additional prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography for perioperative and late prognosis in patients with AAA and CAD.     

Coronary artery bypass surgery prior to resection of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with unstable coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm in greater than 60% of cases. CAD continues to affect postoperative complication rates. Half of the deaths that follow resection of abdominal aortic aneurysms are due to perioperative myocardial infarctions. On evaluation for surgical resection of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, six patients were found to have significant CAD. Each underwent coronary artery bypass surgery prior to elective resection of the aneurysm. No deaths or myocardial infarctions occurred following any of the procedures. We restrict our indications for coronary angiography to the evaluation of patients with unstable angina (pain at rest or after minimal exertion) in whom noninvasive studies reveal evidence of CAD, and for patients who are unresponsive to medical management.     

The role of coronary artery disease in complications of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after elective surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the extent of CAD observed in coronary angiograms (more than 50% stenosis) and the frequency of postoperative myocardial ischemic complications in a consecutive series of 84 patients who underwent elective AAA repair. Ninety-four percent of the patients with clinical evidence of CAD had significant disease as observed in coronary angiograms and eight patients had left main CAD. Seventy-two patients underwent AAA repair with a mortality rate of 1.4%; five patients had preliminary myocardial revascularization, and AAA surgery was not recommended for four patients because of severe cardiac disease. Postoperative myocardial ischemic complications occurred in 13.4% of the patients who had undergone surgery--almost exclusively in patients with clinical evidence of CAD. Both myocardial ischemia and preoperative intervention were more frequent in patients with double- or triple-vessel disease than in patients with less extensive disease. Patients with symptoms and with double- or triple-vessel CAD have a high risk of developing myocardial ischemia after AAA surgery. Preliminary myocardial revascularization may be beneficial in this group of patients.     

Treatment strategy for patients with concomitant thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysm and noncardiovascular disease

Therapeutic planning for patients with concomitant thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and noncardiovascular disease such as cerebral aneurysm, carotid artery stenosis, or lung, intraabdominal or urologic tumor should be considered based on the combination of the two different conditions, the size of aneurysm, or the severity of noncardiovascular disease. The aims of this paper are to review the therapeutic plans for concomitant TAA or AAA and noncardiovascular disease. In patients with concomitant TAA or AAA and cerebral aneurysm, carotid artery stenosis, and concomitant TAA and intraabdominal or urologic tumor, the surgical procedures have usually been staged with the repair of cerebral aneurysm, or carotid artery stenosis, the resection of intraabdominal or urologic tumor performed first, followed by the repair of TAA or AAA. Simultaneous surgical treatment has been performed for most patients with concomitant TAA and lung tumor, and concomitant AAA and intraabdominal or urologic tumor. The issue of performing simultaneous pulmonary resection and repair of AAA in patients with concomitant lung tumor and AAA remains controversial. Endovascular grafting of TAA and AAA can be performed with relatively low procedure-related morbidity and mortality rates in selected patients.     

The low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in relatives in Northern Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains high and has given impetus to screening. Targeted screening towards high-risk groups would increase efficacy. Relatives of previous AAA patients have been suggested as one such group. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the prevalence of AAA in relatives of previous patients in Northern Ireland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All living AAA patients, who underwent surgery between August 2001 and December 2005 in our unit, or were attending for follow-up of small aneurysms were contacted and asked for details of siblings and their family history. Screening by ultrasound was offered to the siblings and children over 50 years, with a defining threshold diameter for an aneurysm of 3.0 cm. Overall prevalence of AAA in the relatives was calculated. Separate prevalence rates were calculated according to relationship and gender of the patient and relative. RESULTS: 513 previous patients were contacted. 132 gave details of living relatives, resulting in a total of 405 relatives suitable for screening. 105 declined a scan, leaving 300 in the study. Overall mean age of the group was 63.0+/-8.7 years and 68% were siblings of male patients. Overall ten AAAs were detected by screening, giving a prevalence of 3.3%. No aneurysms were found in the subgroup of children, while the highest prevalence (12.5%) was found in brothers of female patients. 20 additional AAAs were reported in these 132 families, resulting in 14 of the 132 families (10.6%) having two or more members with AAA. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of screening detected AAA in this study is lower than anticipated. The reason is unclear, but demonstrates the multifactorial nature of the aetiology and genetic complexities yet to be unravelled by future research.     

The outcome of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with and without cardiac disease.

PURPOSE: We report the outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with and without cardiac disease. In patients with cardiac disease, we compared staged procedures and simultaneous operations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 217 patients underwent scheduled AAA repair from 1994 to 2005. When the AAA with cardiac disease was 5.0 cm or less in diameter, we performed a staged procedure. When it was more than 5.0 cm in diameter, we performed a simultaneous operation. Forty-two patients underwent simultaneous operations, and 15 had staged procedures. RESULTS: No occurrence of major cardiac complication was detected in any patient postoperatively. There were no hospital deaths in either the no-cardiac-disease group or the staged-procedure group. There were two hospital deaths in the simultaneous group. The estimated actuarial 10-year survival rates were 58.9 +/- 9.9% and 68.2 +/- 1.5% for the no-cardiac-disease group and the with-cardiac-disease group, respectively (P = 0.85). The 10-year survival rates were 71.2 +/- 1.6% and 74.8 +/- 1.3% for the one-stage-operation group and the staged-operation group, respectively (P = 0.35). There was no significant difference with regard to hospital deaths and late mortality rate among the groups. CONCLUSION: The simultaneous operation method is a useful technique in patients having both a large AAA and cardiac disease.     

Coronary artery disease in patients requiring abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Selective use of a combined operation.

The chief cause of operative mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is myocardial infarction. For this reason, routine coronary angiography followed by prophylactic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) prior to AAA repair has been recommended by some surgeons. We report here the results of the selective use of a combined operation. Two hundred twenty-seven patients had elective or emergency repair of nonruptured AAA on our service from 1972 to 1983. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent careful clinical evaluation for the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and were classified into the following: group I (n = 121), no clinical evidence of CAD, 53%; group II (n = 96), clinical evidence of stable CAD, symptomatic or asymptomatic, 42%; group III (n = 10), unstable CAD, five per cent; Group IIIa (n = 4), asymptomatic AAA; and group IIIb (n = 6), symptomatic AAA. Seven patients ultimately assigned to group II underwent stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and eight group II patients had coronary angiography before surgery. All patients in groups I and II underwent elective or urgent repair of their AAA without CABG. Prior to surgery, these patients were managed with placement of a pulmonary artery catheter and incremental volume loading to construct a left ventricular performance curve as a guide to surgical fluid replacement. All were carefully monitored for at least 48 hours after surgery in an intensive care unit. Four patients (group IIIa) with unstable CAD and asymptomatic AAA underwent CABG followed by elective AAA repair within six months. Six patients (group IIIb) with unstable CAD and symptomatic AAA underwent combined open heart surgery (CABG and, in one patient, valve replacement) and AAA repair as a single operation. There was no operative mortality in group III patients. Thirty-day operative mortality for the entire group of 227 patients was 1.3% (three deaths), with only one death from a myocardial infarction (0.4%). While there is clearly a high incidence of CAD in patients with AAA, the present results indicate that these individuals can be managed with low risk by a selective approach based upon clinical assessment of their CAD. Our experience further demonstrates that patients with unstable CAD and symptomatic AAA may have both lesions safely repaired as a single operative procedure.