Left colonic antegrade continence enema: experience gained from 19 cases

Purpose

As problems have developed with the right colonic antegrade continence enema procedure (Malone's procedure/Monti's retubularized ileocolostomy), left colonic antegrade continence enema (LACE) procedure, in which retubularized ileum or sigmoid colon is anastomosed into the sigmoid colon, has gained popularity. The aim of the study was to describe our experience with the LACE procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 19 LACE procedures that were performed at the Yonsei University College of Medicine Hospital (Seoul, Korea) from March 2001 to March 2005.

Results

Male-to-female ratio was 11:8, with median age of 10 years (range, 3-34 years). Most common diagnosis was meningomyelocele (78.9%, 15/19). The median total follow-up period was 23 months (range, 3-37 months); median antegrade continence enema volume used was 600 mL (range, 250-1500 mL); and median transit time was 30 minutes (range, 15-60 minutes). Patients performed antegrade continence enema with an average of once every 2 days (range, 0.3-3 days). Social continence was achieved in 14 patients (73.7%). Regurgitation of fecal material through stoma was not reported at all in 17 patients (89.5%).

Conclusions

We recommend LACE as the procedure of choice for children with congenital malformations or any other condition predisposing to fecal incontinence or constipation intractable to conventional treatment.     

The colon flap/extension Malone antegrade continence enema: an alternative to the Monti-Malone antegrade continence enema

PURPOSE: In situations where the appendix is not available for the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure a Yang-Monti channel or a colon flap conduit can be created. We report our experience with colonic flap conduits used for the MACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 169 MACE procedures were performed between February 1997 and March 2003. In 11 patients 12 colon flaps or cecal extensions were used to construct the MACE conduit. Diagnoses included myelomeningocele (8 patients), caudal regression (1), sacral agenesis (1) and gunshot wound (1). Mean age at creation of MACE was 11.3 years (range 4.4 to 16.9). Seven cecal flaps, 1 descending colon flap and 4 cecal extension flaps were created. RESULTS: Average followup was 22.8 months (range 2.6 to 34.6). Indications for colon flap MACE were appendicovesicostomy (6 patients), short appendix (2), shortened mesentery (1), retrocecal appendix (1), prior appendectomy (1) and right hemicolectomy (1). Initially all patients easily catheterized and flushed the MACE once daily. All 11 patients achieved fecal continence. Complications occurred in 3 cases. One obese patient could not visualize the umbilical stoma and it stenosed, requiring conversion to a spiral Monti-MACE. One patient with a cecal extension had development of a false passage, resulting in complete channel stenosis. One patient had development of stomal leakage, which was successfully treated with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection. CONCLUSIONS: A colon flap MACE conduit is a simple technique to provide access to the colon for irrigation. When faced with situations were the appendix is not available for the MACE procedure the colon flap can be a good option.     

Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema using a two-port technique

BACKGROUND: The antegrade continence enema is an effective method of treatment of fecal incontinence. We report our experience of a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure and describe a simple approach to this procedure using a two-port technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 12 children with intractable constipation and fecal soiling underwent the antegrade continence enema procedure laparoscopically. All cases had full bowel preparation the day before surgery. This procedure was done through one 5-mm camera port and two 5-mm working ports in 8 cases, and using the camera port and only one additional 5-mm working port in 4 cases. The appendix was used in 5 cases and the cecum in 3 cases with the threeport technique while the appendix was used in all 4 cases with the two-port technique. The appendix or cecum was delivered extracorporeally through the 5-mm port site in the right lower quadrant. The mucocutaneous anastomosis was stented using a gastrostomy button. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2004, 12 children (10 male, 2 female) underwent a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure at a median age of 10.5 years (range, 7-14 years). This procedure was easy to perform and no case required conversion to an open procedure. The wash-outs via the MIC-KEY gastrostomy button (MIC-KEY, Kimberly-Clark) were commenced at a median of 3.5 days (range, 1-5 days). Median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-5 days). This procedure was effective in completely resolving fecal incontinence in 9 cases and partially resolving it in 3 cases. There were no episodes of stomal stenosis, leakage, or herniation. However, one case required a revision of antegrade continence enema due to wound breakdown and leakage of irrigation fluid around the stoma. The median follow-up period was 15.5 months (range, 5-32 months). CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic technique is a simple and effective approach in creating an antegrade continence enema. The use of a gastrostomy button can potentially reduce some of the complications commonly associated with an antegrade continence enema. We describe a procedure that incorporates the advantages of both laparoscopy and a button device, which is simple and easy to perform using just two ports.     

A new complication of the Malone antegrade continence enema

The Malone antegrade continence enema now commonly known as the ACE procedure was described originally for the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence in 1990. Since this time it has been used widely in many centers for the treatment of constipation and faecal soiling in both adult and pediatric practice. This case report describes a previously unreported complication of an ACE that developed in a disused appendicocecostomy in a child. J Pediatr Surg 37:1216.     

The antegrade continence enema successfully treats idiopathic slow-transit constipation

Background

Antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) are successful for constipation and/or fecal incontinence caused by anorectal malformations or spina bifida but have been thought to be less successful in the treatment for patients with colonic dysmotility. We studied the long-term efficacy of ACE in a large group of patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation (STC).

Methods

We identified 56 children with an appendicostomy for ACE with radiologically proven STC. An independent investigator (SKK) performed confidential telephone interviews.

Results

We assessed 42 of 56 children (31 boys) of mean age 13.1 years (range, 6.9-25). Mean follow-up was at 48 months (range, 3-118). Mean symptom duration before appendicostomy was 7.5 years (range, 1.4-17.4). Indications for appendicostomy were soiling (29/42), inadequate stool evacuation (7/42), and recurrent hospital admissions for nasogastric washouts (6/42). Both quality of life (Templeton quality of life [P < .0001]) and continence (modified Holschneider continence score [P < .0001]) improved with ACE. Soiling frequency decreased in 32 of 42 (11/32 completely continent). Thirty-seven of 42 children had reduced abdominal pain severity (P < .0001) and frequency (P < .0001). Complications included granulation tissue (33/42), stomal infection (18/42), and washout leakage (16/42). Fifteen of 42 children ceased using the appendicostomy (7/15 symptoms resolved). Thirty-five of 42 families felt that their aspirations had been met.

Conclusions

Antegrade continence enemas were successful in 34 (81%) of 42 children with STC, contradicting views that ACEs are less effective in patients with colonic dysmotility.     

Durability of the Malone antegrade continence enema in pregnancy

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) is a therapeutic option to treat chronic constipation and fecal incontinence in patients with neurogenic bowel. Previous reports have described the short-term success of this procedure, but no report has described the durability of the procedure during pregnancy. We present the case of a spinal cord injury patient who underwent an uncomplicated pregnancy after a MACE procedure with no stomal catheterization difficulties or leakage during or after the pregnancy.     

The Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: early experience

PURPOSE: The successful treatment of fecal incontinence can dramatically improve the quality of life of affected children. The introduction of the Malone antegrade continence enema provides the opportunity to manage previously resistant cases. However, using the to create this catheterizable channel is not always possible, and the duration of these antegrade enemas is a source of concern for the patients. We describe a new approach to create left continent colonic access to shorten the duration of these enemas, and report the experience gained from the first 9 cases managed at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 5-year period 9 patients underwent a Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema at our institution. Incontinence was associated with myelomeningocele in 7 patients and anorectal malformation in 2. The antegrade continence enema procedure is begun by isolating a 2 cm flap in a tenia on the left colon (spleen flexure). A 12Fr silicone Foley catheter is placed on the mucosal surface of the flap to allow tubularization of the plate with interrupted polyglycolic acid 3-zero transverse sutures, creating an efferent tubular conduit. Antegrade colonic washouts were started 2 weeks after surgery with saline solution or tap water in all patients. RESULTS: Followup of our 9 cases ranged from 8 to 33 months (average 20.7). Enema volume varied from 250 to 800 ml, with administration taking from 45 to 60 minutes, and colonic evacuation occurred within 30 to 60 minutes of enema administration. Of the 9 patients 8 were completely continent and 1 was partially continent. Four patients experienced difficulty with catheterization initially because of stenosis of the stomal track. The affected stomas were dilated, which was successful in 1 case. Three patients subsequently required stomal revision. CONCLUSIONS: The Macedo-Malone procedure is a relatively straightforward operative approach providing an effective washout technique that is acceptable to parents and children.     

Outcomes following Malone antegrade continence enema and their surgical revisions

Background/Purpose

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) channel is an effective means to manage patients with neurogenic bowel; however, complications may occur that may require surgical revision. Specific reports of the outcomes of these interventions are limited. We describe our clinical results following revision of MACE.

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing MACE revision for at our institution between 1997 and 2009. Type of MACE (in situ appendicocecostomy (AC = 247), ileocecostomy (IC = 25), cecal flap (CF = 10)) performed was recorded, time from creation to revision, site of revision, and need for repeat surgical revision were recorded.

Results

Of a total of 282 patients that underwent creation of MACE during the study period, 49 patients (17%) required surgical revision. Of these 49 patients, 42 had undergone AC, four had IC and three had CF. Mean time from MACE creation to revision was 19 months. Sixty-eight revision procedures were performed in the 49 patients. Skin level or endoscopic procedures accounted for 52/67 (78%) procedures. Sixteen patients (33%) required more than one revision and three patients (6%) required more than two procedures.

Conclusions

Skin level revisions accounted for over three-fourths of MACE revisions. In our series, two thirds of patients requiring revision required only a single procedure, but one third required more than one revision.     

The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: the Amsterdam experience

Background

The Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) procedure has been previously described as a safe and effective option for the treatment of children with chronic defecation disorders when maximal medical therapy and conventional treatment have failed.

Purpose

To evaluate clinical success, complications, and quality of life of children with chronic defecation disorders with a MACE stoma.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 23 patients who underwent the construction of a MACE stoma was performed. Preoperative and postoperative data were evaluated. A specific questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction.

Results

A significant increase was found in defecation frequency (1.0 [range, 0-4] pretreatment vs 5.5 [range, 0-28] posttreatment per week; P < .006) and a significant decrease in fecal incontinence frequency (10 [range, 0-14] pretreatment vs 0 [range, 0-14] posttreatment per week; P < .034). Postoperative complications of the MACE procedure were fecal leakage (43%), wound infection (52%), and stomal stenosis (39%). A total of 86% of the patients were satisfied with the results of the Malone stoma (n = 21).

Conclusions

The MACE procedure is an effective treatment in children with intractable defecation disorders. Postoperative complications are, however, not uncommon. Further refinement of the technique focused to reduce the complication rate is necessary to expand the application of this approach.     

Robot-assisted Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstruction using divided appendix

Fecal soiling or intractable constipation frequently occurs in association with urinary incontinence in children with varying pathologic conditions. To manage double incontinence or the combination of wetting and severe constipation, a Mitrofanoff conduit and a channel for antegrade continence enema is constructed using the appendix by open surgery. We present a video of the first case of robot-assisted laparoscopy for simultaneous reconstruction of a continent urinary diversion using the Mitrofanoff principle and a Malone antegrade continent enema using the divided appendix.     

Modified technique of antegrade continence enema using a stapling device

PURPOSE: We present a stapling technique for constructing an antegrade continence enema (ACE) conduit that is helpful in cases of insufficient appendiceal luminal length or when a concomitant appendiceal Mitrofanoff stoma is required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 6 patients with a mean age of 9.5 years who required an ACE procedure the cecum was tubularized in continuation with the orthotopic appendix at its base, using a stapling device to construct an ACE conduit. The tubularized segment was imbricated with permanent suture material. In 3 cases appendiceal length after tubularization was sufficient to allow splitting for the concomitant creation of an appendiceal Mitrofanoff stoma. RESULTS: Patients have been followed an average of 16.5 months. Stomal continence was achieved in all cases as well as reliable catheterization of the appendiceal cecostomy in 6 and the Mitrofanoff conduit in 3. CONCLUSIONS: This modification of the ACE procedure with cecal tubularization in continuation with the appendix using a stapling device is an excellent approach in cases of inadequate appendiceal length. It successfully creates a catheterizable stoma with a reliable flap valve continence mechanism. The complex reconstructive procedure is simplified by eliminating the need to use tapered small intestine, while allowing the creation of a concomitant appendiceal Mitrofanoff stoma as necessary.     

Left-colon antegrade continence enema (LACE) procedure for fecal incontinence

Purpose: Antegrade continence enemas (ACE) are an efficacious therapeutic option for patients with fecal incontinence. The authors review their institution’s experience with a variation of the Monti-Malone ACE procedure using the left colon as a source of an intestinal conduit and enema reservoir.Methods: From 2000 to 2002, 18 patients with fecal incontinence or intractable constipation underwent left-colon ACE (LACE) procedure. Concomitant Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy was performed in 15 patients and bladder augmentation in 9. The majority of patients had neural tube defects. A segment of left colon was tubularized, tunneled into the muscular wall of the distal colon, and exteriorized through the left upper quadrant or midabdomen. Stomal catherization and enema installation were started one month postoperatively.Results: Fifteen patients (83%) achieved fecal continence, 2 remain incontinent of stool, and 1 experienced stomal closure (mean follow-up was 24 ± 9 months). Two patients had stomal stenosis that required revision. The mean enema volume in patient’s achieving continence was 360 ± 216 mL, and the mean transit time was 18 ± 12 minutes.Conclusions: LACE is an efficacious procedure for fecal incontinence that can be performed safely at the time of major urologic reconstruction. Administration of enemas into the left colon has several physiologic advantages that result in predictable bowel evacuation.     

Outcome of antegrade continence enema procedures for faecal incontinence in adults

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence has major consequences. Colostomy has been the mainstay of therapy when other options fail. Operations such as the Malone procedure have been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and quality of life of patients having a Malone procedure for the treatment of faecal incontinence. METHODS: Charts of patients who had had a Malone procedure or equivalent between 1998 and 2004 were reviewed. The patients completed a Short Form (SF) 36 quality of life questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 25 patients (17 female; median age 47 years). In seven, the appendix was used; an ileoneoappendicostomy was performed in the other 18. Three patients were lost to follow-up; the remaining 22 were followed for a median (range) of 21 (1-61) months. Five patients had a cutaneous stenosis; another had the appendicostomy removed and replaced by a colostomy. Four patients no longer used the stoma for irrigation. All other patients were completely clean except one, who reported occasional night-time seepage. The mean SF-36 showed a good physical recovery (43.9) but persisting psychological distress (36.0). CONCLUSION: The Malone procedure or equivalent achieves good results in the management of faecal incontinence, although psychological distress persists after surgery.