Does the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Short Curriculum Increase Resident Knowledge in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology?

Study ObjectiveTo determine if the North American Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology (NASPAG) Short Curriculum improves self-reported knowledge in pediatric and adolescent gynecology (PAG) among obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents, at programs without PAG-trained faculty.DesignProspective, cross-sectional exposure to the NASPAG short curriculum with a follow-up questionnaire.SettingOb/Gyn residency training programs without PAG faculty.ParticipantsOb/Gyn residents in training from February 2015 to June 2015.InterventionsExposure to the NASPAG Short Curriculum.Main Outcome MeasuresImprovement in self-perceived knowledge after completion of curriculum.ResultsTwo hundred twenty-seven residents met inclusion criteria; 34 completed the study (15% response). Less than 50% of residents reported adequate knowledge in the areas of prepubertal vaginal bleeding, vulvovaginitis, precocious and delayed puberty, Home environment, Education and Employment, Eating, peer-related Activities, Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide/depression, Safety from injury and violence (HEEADSSS) interview, pelvic pain, and bleeding management in teens with developmental delay. After completion of the curriculum, self-reported knowledge improved in 8 of 10 learning objectives, with no significant improvement in bleeding disorders or Müllerian anomalies. There was no association between pretest knowledge and level of residency training, type of residency program, previous exposure to PAG lectures, and previous exposure to patients with PAG complaints.ConclusionSignificant deficiencies exist regarding self-reported knowledge of core PAG topics among Ob/Gyn residents at programs without PAG-trained faculty. Use of the NASPAG Short Curriculum by residents without access to PAG-trained faculty resulted in improved self-reported knowledge in PAG.     

Barriers Preventing Medical Students From Performing Pelvic Examinations During Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinical Clerkship Rotations

ObjectiveThis study sought to identify barriers that prevent medical students from performing pelvic examinations in their obstetrics and gynaecology (Ob/Gyn) clinical clerkship rotations and to compare the perspectives of faculty, residents, nurses, and students regarding perceived barriers.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to third-year Dalhousie University (Halifax, NS) medical students on completion of their Ob/Gyn clerkship rotations in the 2015-2016 academic year and to Ob/Gyn nursing staff, faculty, and residents (Canadian Task Force Classification III).ResultsThere were 82 responses, giving an overall response rate of 28%. Students reported performing an average of 9.2 speculum examinations, 3.8 cervical checks, and 2.8 bimanual examinations during their 6-week rotations. They reported being declined the opportunity to perform an examination an average of 7.1 times. Students perceived themselves to be more competent performing these examinations compared with staff perception of student competency. Students perceived resident interest in teaching, resident and staff time constraints, and patient willingness to have a medical student involved in their examination as frequent barriers. Faculty, residents, and nurses perceived student gender, patient willingness, difficulty of examination, and resident time constraints to be significant barriers.ConclusionThis study is the first to examine multidisciplinary perspectives on perceived barriers to medical students performing pelvic examinations. Staff and students have different perceptions of a student's competence performing these examinations. Existing barriers are likely multifactorial.     

Fetal ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents

OBJECTIVE: To assess the present state of fetal ultrasound training in the United States from the perspective of obstetrics and gynecology ultrasound program directors and residents. METHODS: One hundred thirty-six ultrasound program directors from 254 accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs completed a web-based survey regarding obstetric ultrasound training for residents. Questions were presented in yes-or-no, ranking, short-answer, and open-comment formats that examined general teaching environment and curriculum content. These results were compared with a mandatory fetal ultrasound training survey that was independently administered to 4,666 obstetrics and gynecology residents during the 2003 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG) In-Training Examination. Friedman one-way analysis of variance was used to compare ranked nonparametric data with the Dunn posttest. Statistical significance was taken at the P <.05 level. RESULTS: Fifty-four percent of accredited obstetrics and gynecology residencies responded to the survey of ultrasound directors from November 2000 to April 2003. Nearly all responding directors were obstetrician-gynecologists, many of whom had subspecialty training in maternal-fetal medicine. Full-time faculty and sonographers were the most important individuals contributing to ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents. Hands-on scanning and observation were the most significant educational activities for ultrasound training. Ultrasound program directors generally rated the overall preparedness of residents as ranging from adequate to excellent. The most important learning obstacles were limited curriculum and faculty time. Most programs evaluated competency by direct observation of scanning skills. According to the CREOG survey, only 16.3% of residents indicated that the performance and interpretation of fetal ultrasound examinations were mandatory program requirements. Nearly two thirds of residents believed that their training would be adequate by the time of graduation. Only 18.4% of residents, however, were planning to perform or interpret fetal ultrasound scans in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Fetal ultrasound training for obstetrics and gynecology residents is perceived by most ultrasound program directors and residents to be adequate. Future development of standardized guidelines and competency assessment tools should consider that approximately one fifth of obstetrics and gynecology residents are currently planning to use this diagnostic modality in clinical practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2     

The benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for obstetrics and gynecology residents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of a special elective gynecologic oncology program for Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents. METHODS: We reviewed our housestaff records from July 1992 to June 1998 and the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) subspeciality match results for gynecologic oncology from its inception in 1994 to 1999. RESULTS: From July 1992 to June 1998, a total of 146 residents participated in our elective program. Of the 104 candidates who went through our program and subsequently participated in the NRMP, 55 (53%) obtained match positions. After completion of the elective, 42 of the 146 residents (29%) did not participate in the NRMP for gynecologic oncology and therefore were not eligible to obtain match appointments. During the study period, there were 255 other residents in the United States who applied for gynecologic oncology fellowship positions through the NRMP and did not participate in our program. Of these 255 candidates, 137 (54%) matched. CONCLUSION: The percentage of residents who went through our program, participated in the NRMP, and obtained fellowships did not differ significantly from the percentage of residents who matched without participating in the program. However, almost one-third of the residents who went through our program did not participate in the NRMP. The reasons for their lack of participation were not formally evaluated, but are likely related to a personal decision to pursue another carrer pathway, a decision facilitiated by their experience in our program. Therefore, it appears that the main benefits of the program are to help potential candidates decide whether or not to pursue a career in gyencologic oncology and to aid fellowship programs in identifying exceptional candidates for subspecialty training.     

Dealing with Female Sexuality: Training,Attitude, and Practice of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents from a Developing Country

IntroductionThere is little research on how obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents deal with female sexuality, especially during pregnancy.AimThe aim of this study was to assess the training, attitude, and practice of Ob/Gyn residents about sexuality.MethodsA cross-sectional survey of Brazilian Ob/Gyn residents enrolling in an online sexology course was conducted. A questionnaire assessed their training in sexuality during medical school and residency and their attitude and practice on sexual issues during pregnancy.Main Outcome MeasuresTraining, attitude, and practice of Ob/Gyn residents regarding sexuality were the main outcome measures.ResultsA total of 197 residents, from 21 different programs, answered the online questionnaire. Mean age was 27.9 ± 2.2, most were female (87%), single (79%), and had graduated in the last 5 years (91%). Almost two-thirds (63%) stated that they did not receive any training at all and 28% reported having only up to 6 hours of training about sexuality in medical school. Approximately half of the respondents (49%) stated that they had received no formal training about sexuality during their residency up to that moment and 29% had received ≤6 hours of training. Over half (56%) never or rarely took a sexual history, 51% stated that they did not feel competent or confident to answer their pregnant patients’ questions about sexuality, and 84% attributed their difficulties in dealing with sexual complaints to their lack of specific knowledge on the topic.ConclusionThe vast majority of Brazilian Ob/Gyn residents enrolling in a sexuality course had little previous formal training on this topic in medical school and during their residency programs. Most residents do not take sexual histories of pregnant patients, do not feel confident in answering questions about sexuality in pregnancy, and attribute these difficulties to lack of knowledge. These findings point to a clear need for additional training in sexuality among Brazilian Ob/Gyn residents. Vieira TCSB, de Souza E, da Silva I, Torloni MR, Ribeiro MC, and Nakamura MU. Dealing with female sexuality: Training, attitude, and practice of obstetrics and gynecology residents from a developing country. J Sex Med 2015;12:1154–1157.     

Video Playback as an Educational Tool for Improving Resident Laparoscopic Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Study ObjectiveIn this single-masked randomized controlled study, we evaluate whether watching video recordings of oneself performing Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Skills (FLS) exercises results in an improvement on the 30-point Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) assessment among Obstetrics and Gynecology (Ob/Gyn) residents.DesignTwenty-three Ob/Gyn residents in the 2020–2021 academic year completed the FLS exercises while being timed, video recorded, and receiving real-time feedback from an Ob/Gyn faculty member. Baseline GOALS assessment was completed by participants and faculty. After the intervention, all participants then repeated the FLS exercises while being timed and were again scored using the GOALS assessment. Each participant completed the study in a single session. In addition, all participants completed a pre- and post-test survey.SettingUniversity of Louisville Laparoscopic Skills Labortaory.ParticipantsUniversity of Louisville Ob/Gyn residents in the 2020–2021 academic year.InterventionTwelve participants were randomized to the intervention and were allowed to watch their video recording in addition to receiving verbal feedback whereas the remaining 11 received verbal feedback only.Measurements and Main ResultsThere were significant improvements in faculty (p <.01) and self-reported GOALS scores (p <.01) when comparing both the intervention and control group with baseline scores. The intervention group improved by 3.2 points more than that of the control group based on masked faculty evaluation (95% confidence interval, 1.4–5.0 points; p <.01). The difference was not significant in resident self-scores. Overall time improved for all participants (15:54 ± 0.21 minutes before and 13:13 ± 0.14 minutes after), but this difference was not significant between the 2 groups. Higher postgraduate year (PGY) residents reported significantly more comfort performing laparoscopic tasks, earned higher GOALS score (faculty and self-scores), and completed the first set of exercises in less time. A significant interaction between PGY and intervention was detected with improvement in GOALS score most strongly associated with PGY4 residents (p <.01).ConclusionAlthough all learners objectively benefit from watching recordings of themselves performing surgical tasks, advanced learners may benefit the most when video recordings are used as an educational tool.     

Surgical experiences and training of residents: perspective of experienced gynecologic oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report the opinions of experienced gynecologic oncologists concerning the surgical education and experiences of residents. METHODS: The 1997 membership directory of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists was used to identify individuals who were members for at least 5 years and on the faculty of residency training programs. One hundred seventy members were identified and a nine-question survey was mailed to them. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen (70%) surveys were returned. One hundred seventeen individuals were on the faculty of residency training programs and involved in the surgical training of residents. Ninety-six percent reported that gynecologic oncologists were a major resource for surgical education at their institution. Eight-nine (76%) reported a change in the volume of major abdominal and vaginal surgical procedures performed for noninvasive disease over the past 5 years. Of these 89, 16 (18%) reported that surgical volume at their institution decreased by 10%, 38 (43%) reported that surgical volume decreased by 10-25%, and 17 (19%) reported that surgical volume decreased by more than 25%. Sixty-three percent of all respondents reported that residents were not as well versed in pre- and postoperative care when compared to those of 5 years ago. Sixty-five percent of all respondents reported that graduating residents were less prepared in surgical techniques when compared to those of 5 years ago. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported that the primary care requirements of the RRC have decreased the amount of surgical experience, ICU rotations, and anesthesia rotations. Sixty percent of all respondents operated with other attending surgeons on more difficult cases, and 29% had changed to this practice within the past 5 years. Eighty-two percent believed that more time during residency training needs to be devoted gynecologic surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: Experienced gynecologic oncologists on the faculty of residency training programs report a decrease in surgical skills and surgical experiences when compared to residents trained 5 years ago.     

Managed health care and resident education

OBJECTIVE: We wished to determine the impact of managed health care on resident education in obstetrics and gynecology. STUDY DESIGN: A multiquestion survey was mailed to program directors of the 267 obstetrics-gynecology resident training programs in the United States. The questions ascertained departmental philosophy regarding the role of obstetrician-gynecologists as primary care versus specialist physicians, the extent of involvement with managed health care companies, educational curriculum content, the effect of managed care on patient volume, faculty time available for resident teaching, and the effect of managed care on resident education. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 210 (79%) program directors. One hundred twenty-six (63%) program directors responded that obstetrician-gynecologists should be primary care physicians for women, and 120 (60%) believed that the role of subspecialists will be reduced in the near future. In 1996, 177 (94%) programs had managed care contracts; many (57%) had >20 contracts. All programs participate with other specialties to teach primary care to their residents. One hundred twelve (59%) programs have had a decrease in patient volume, prompting 90 (45%) programs to increase their number of teaching sites. Of concern, 54 (26%) program directors noted that managed care companies discourage but do not restrict resident participation in the care and treatment of managed care patients, and 41 (20%) programs had some restrictions placed on such resident involvement. Budgetary constraints have decreased resources to 97 (47%) programs and threaten the time available for faculty teaching. CONCLUSIONS: Managed health care is having an effect on many resident teaching programs. Program directors are integrating managed care concepts into the educational curriculum and are negotiating with managed care organizations to involve residents in the care and treatment of managed care patients. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:1157-64.)     

Graduating Obstetrics and Gynaecology Residents’ Readiness for Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

ObjectiveThis study sought to evaluate the self-reported and program director–reported comfort of graduating Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology residents in independently performing various surgical skills.MethodsA Web-based survey was distributed to four cohorts of graduating obstetrics and gynaecology residents across Canada (2014-2017). Residents were asked to indicate their comfort level with independently performing 34 core surgical procedures by using a five-point Likert-type scale. A similar survey was sent to program directors. Comfort scores for residents and program directors were compared using quantitative and qualitative methods as appropriate (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3).ResultsResident and program director survey response rates were 168 of 320 (52.5%) and 20 of 48 (41.7%), respectively. Residents were “comfortable” or “very comfortable” performing 7 of 13 (54%) gynaecology and 4 of 6 (67%) obstetrics List A procedures independently. Program directors reported that residents were “comfortable” or “very comfortable” performing 10 of 13 (77%) gynaecology and 4 of 6 (67%) obstetrics List A procedures. Compared with program directors, residents reported lower comfort with certain minimally invasive and obstetrics List A procedures (P < 0.05). Differences in comfort when performing several List A procedures were related to training program size and plans to pursue fellowship. Qualitative analysis revealed several major and minor themes supporting the dichotomy between residents’ lack of comfort and program directors’ expectation of comfort.ConclusionGraduating residents were not comfortable performing many core surgical procedures independently. Additionally, program directors believed that trainees were more comfortable than they reported, and comfort varied according to program size and future fellowship plans. The new competency-based curriculum is an opportunity to address this gap.     

Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency.

OBJECTIVE: Determine chief residents' experience with vacuum and forceps deliveries and self-perceived competencies with the procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Study 1: A written questionnaire was mailed to all fourth year residents in US RRC approved Ob/Gyn programs. Study 2: The study was replicated using a web-based survey the following year. Data were analyzed with chi (2) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests using SPSS. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 238 residents (20%) in Study 1 and 269 residents in Study 2 (23%, representing 50% of all residency programs). In both studies, residents reported performing significantly less forceps than vacuum deliveries. Virtually all residents wanted to learn to perform both deliveries, indicated attendings were willing to teach both, and felt competent to perform vacuum deliveries (Study 1, 94.5%; Study 2, 98.5%); only half felt competent to perform forceps deliveries (Study 1, 57.6%; Study 2, 55.0%). The majority of residents who felt competent to perform forceps deliveries reported that they would predominately use forceps or both methods of deliveries in their practice (Study 1, 75.8%; Study 2, 64.6%). The majority of residents who reported that they did not feel competent to perform forceps deliveries reported that they would predominately use vacuum deliveries in their practice (Study 1, 86.1%; Study 2, 84.2%). CONCLUSION: Current training results in a substantial portion of residents graduating who do not feel competent to perform forceps deliveries. Perceived competency affected future operative delivery plans.     

Residency training in colposcopy: a survey of program directors in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify how colposcopy is being taught to residents in obstetrics and gynecology and family practice programs and to see if the program directors think their residents receive sufficient clinical exposure to be adequately trained in colposcopy. STUDY DESIGN: A 30-question survey was sent to all obstetrics and gynecology and family practice residency program directors. The survey included questions about the didactic nature of the colposcopy curriculum, the type of supervision, how resident skills are evaluated, estimates of the numbers and types of patients evaluated, the numbers and types of procedures being done by each resident, and the program director's perception of residents' competence in colposcopy. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 485 of 752 program directors (64.5%). Significantly fewer family practice than obstetrics and gynecology program directors thought they had adequate numbers of colposcopy patients to train their residents. By their program directors' estimates, 86% of family practice residents evaluate 10 or fewer patients with high-grade lesions (versus 16.5% of obstetrics and gynecology residents); 51.4% evaluate 10 patients or fewer with low-grade lesions (versus 6.7% of obstetrics and gynecology residents), and 40.6% evaluate 10 patients or fewer with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (versus 3% of obstetrics and gynecology residents). Experience with vulvar disease is also limited. Program directors thought their residents' colposcopy skills were roughly comparable with their general obstetrics and gynecology skills. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that many program directors underestimate the number of colposcopic examinations required to achieve and maintain colposcopic skills. Many training programs have insufficient clinical volume to properly train residents in colposcopy.     

Residency Training in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Across Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study

Study ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology formal training in the United States Obstetric and Gynecology residency programs.DesignProspective, anonymous, cross-sectional study.ParticipantsUnited States program directors of Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs, N = 242; respondents 104 (43%).Results104 residency programs responded to our survey. Among the 104 residency programs, 63% (n = 65) have no formal, dedicated Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology clinic, while 83% (n = 87) have no outpatient Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology rotation. There is no significant difference in the amount of time spent on a Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology rotation among residents from institutions with a Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology fellowship (P = .359), however, the number of surgeries performed is significantly higher than those without a Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology fellowship (P = .0020). When investigating resident competency in Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, program directors reported that residents who were taught in a program with a fellowship-trained Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology faculty were significantly more likely to be able to interpret results of selected tests used to evaluate precocious puberty than those without (P = .03).ConclusionsResidency programs without fellowship trained Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology faculty or an established Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology fellowship program may lack formal training and clinical exposure to Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. This information enables residency directors to identify deficiencies in their own residency programs and to seek improvement in resident clinical experience in Pediatric and Adolescent training.     

Core Competencies for Gynecologic Endoscopy in Residency Training: A National Consensus Project

Residents and educators in obstetrics and gynecology have identified the need to improve endoscopic surgical education. The Canadian Endoscopy Education Project aims to create a national standardized endoscopy curriculum. The objective of the current project was to identify the core competencies for a gynecologic endoscopy (GE) curriculum in residency training programs. This expert consensus project (Canadian Task Force Classification III) included all 16 academic obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in Canada. Each university program selected their leading endoscopy educator to participate in the consensus process. Competencies for proficiency in GE were identified and then reviewed in 3 sequential rounds of consensus building using the Delphi technique. Overall, 213 objectives were reviewed and 199 (93%) of the items achieved consensus agreement. Competencies that were deemed outside the realm of general residency education were also collated and may represent a guide to subspecialty fellowship training in the future. The core competencies for GE training in obstetrics and gynecology residency were determined through national expert consensus. This provides the basis for a national standardized endoscopy curriculum for general obstetrics and gynecology training.     

Abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency programs

OBJECTIVE: To study abortion training in Canadian obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) residency programs. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was sent to all postgraduate year (PGY)-4 and PGY-5 ob-gyn residents (n=130) and residency program directors (n=16) in Canada. The questionnaires inquired about demographic information, details of abortion training, resident participation in training, and intention to provide abortions after residency. RESULTS: Ninety-two of 130 residents (71%) and 15 of 16 program directors (94%) responded. Abortion training is considered routine in approximately half of programs and elective in half. The majority of residents (71%) participated in abortion training, and half plan to do elective abortions after residency. More than half of residents felt competent after training to perform first-trimester aspiration and second-trimester inductions but did not feel competent in first-trimester medical abortions or dilation and evacuation (D&E). Residents were more likely to participate in training if the program arranged the training for residents (P=.04) and were more likely to intend to provide abortions if the training was considered routine (P=.02), while controlling for all significant demographic and training variables. CONCLUSION: Most Canadian ob-gyn programs offer some training in elective abortion, but only half include it routinely in training, and the minority of residents feels competent in D&E and medical abortion. Integrated abortion training was associated with greater resident participation in training and increased likelihood of intention to provide abortions after residency.     

Operative note dictation: should it be taught routinely in residency programs?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of formal education regarding operative dictation in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology residency programs and to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of formal teaching regarding operative dictation. METHODS: A 1-page questionnaire was mailed to all U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology residency program directors (n = 270). The operative dictations of all Obstetrics and Gynecology residents at the University of Iowa before and after a 30-minute formal teaching session were evaluated using a scoring system developed by the authors of this study (scale 0-20). RESULTS: A 73% response rate (n = 198) was obtained from the surveys. The results from the survey demonstrated that only 23% of programs provide formal teaching regarding operative dictations; however, 83% of the residency program directors felt that it is an important skill to teach. All 16 obstetrics and gynecology residents at the University of Iowa attended a 30-minute teaching session on operative dictation. The mean scores for all residents improved from 9.06 to 18.56 after a formal teaching session (P <.001). The preteaching scores comparing the 4 classes of residents also varied significantly (ranging from a score of 5.5 for first-year residents to 11.25 for the fourth-year residents, P =.009). There were no differences between scores among the residents after they attended the formal teaching session (P =.11). CONCLUSION: Formal teaching of operative dictation is uncommon in U.S. residency programs but felt to be important by most residency program directors. A brief teaching session is effective and may be useful during residency training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3     

Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency

To examine the status of resident training in robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology programs in the United States, an online survey was emailed to residency program directors of 247 accredited programs identified through the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. Eighty-three of 247 program directors responded, representing a 34% response rate. Robotic surgical systems for gynecologic procedures were used at 65 (78%) institutions. Robotic surgery training was part of residency curriculum at 48 (58%) residency programs. Half of respondents were undecided on training effectiveness. Most program directors believed the role of robotic surgery would increase and play a more integral role in gynecologic surgery. Robotic surgery was widely reported in residency training hospitals with limited availability of effective resident training. Robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency needs further assessment and may benefit from a structured curriculum.     

Episiotomy and perineal repair. An evaluation of resident education and experience

OBJECTIVE: To describe current training practices and experience with episiotomy and perineal repair in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire mailed to all directors of accredited programs in the United States for distribution to fourth-year residents in their last four months of training included 30 questions regarding formal teaching, supervision, experience and repair techniques. RESULTS: A total of 297 of 1,177 (25.2%) residents, representing 47% of programs, responded. The response rates for the various program sizes were: 32.0% for < or = 12 residents, 29.5% for 13-19 residents, 24.6% for 20-24 residents and 18% for > or = 25 residents. Of the residents, 59.9% received no didactics on episiotomy repair techniques; 59.3% had no formal teaching on pelvic floor anatomy; and 27.7% of third-degree repairs were supervised by attending physicians. Of the respondents, 6.8% had repaired > 20 fourth-degree lacerations and 40.3%, > 20 third-degree lacerations. Ten percent of the graduates felt inadequately trained in perineal repair. CONCLUSION: This survey of fourth-year residents from 47% of obstetric programs indicated that the majority of residents received no formal training in pelvic floor anatomy, episiotomy or perineal repair and, when engaged in such activities, had limited supervision.     

Teaching operative dictation. A survey of obstetrics/gynecology residency program directors

OBJECTIVE: To assess current efforts to teach operative dictation in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. STUDY DESIGN: A survey detailing the didactics of operative dictation was distributed in a single mailing to all program directors listed in the roster of the Council on Residency Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. RESULTS: Of 274 surveys distributed, 115 (42%) were returned. Ten percent of program directors reported defined curricula related to operative dictation. Using a combination of lectures, personal instruction and review of previous notes, attendings and senior residents share the responsibility for teaching operative dictation in the majority (78%) of programs. Sixty percent of program directors were in favor of more formal guidelines for residency education in the technique of operative dictation, 34% were opposed, and 6% offered no opinion. CONCLUSION: Obstetrics and gynecology residency programs rarely have a structured curriculum for teaching operative dictation, and the majority of program directors support the institution of more formal guidelines.     

The effects of fellowships on residency training in obstetrics and gynecology

The impact of subspecialty fellowships on resident training deserves examination. Program directors responded to a nationwide survey assessing their opinions, their residents' views, and the Residency Review Committee's comments about fellowship effects on the residency. The directors agreed that the fellows' teaching and research contact enhances training. Competition between fellows and residents for scarce, nonroutine surgical cases detracts from this relationship. Residents reportedly benefit from fellows, yet they resent deferring select surgical experiences to them, such as microsurgery and radical pelvic surgery. The majority of the programs the Residency Review Committee reviewed received positive or neutral comments. Programs that grant their fellows junior faculty status and emphasize research over clinical duties recognize the full benefits of a combined residency-fellowship program.