Thermal and mechanical antinociceptive action of spinal vs peripherally administered clonidine in the rat inflamed knee joint model

It has been demonstrated recently that in addition to its spinal analgesic actions, the alpha 2 adrenoreceptor agonist clonidine also has peripheral analgesic activity. Few data are available regarding the antinociceptive effects of spinal vs peripherally delivered clonidine in inflammatory pain. Thus we have studied spinal (intrathecal = i.t.) and peripheral (intra-articular = i.a.) administration of clonidine in the rat inflamed knee joint model. Thermal and mechanical antinociception was assessed in rats over 28 h using a modified Hargreaves box and von Frey hairs after induction of tonic persistent inflammatory pain by injection of a kaolin-carrageenan mixture into the right knee joint. Thirty minutes after injection of kaolin-carrageenan, clonidine was administered via an i.t. catheter or by i.a. injection into the right inflamed knee joint or by subcutaneous injection (s.c.) (highest effective intra-articular dose). The specific site of action was assessed using the alpha 2 antagonist yohimbine i.t., i.a. or s.c. Clonidine i.t. resulted in thermal and mechanical antinociception during ongoing inflammation, which was not enhanced by inflammation. In contrast, i.a. delivery of clonidine, which also produced a dose- dependent thermal and mechanical antinociceptive effect, revealed a leftward shift in the antinociceptive activity produced by ongoing inflammation. Yohimbine inhibited the antinociceptive action of clonidine at the site of delivery. We suggest that clonidine produces potent thermal and mechanical antinociception regardless of the route of administration. However, chronic inflammatory processing appears to enhance the antinociceptive efficacy of the peripheral alpha 2 agonist.      

Epidural clonidine produces antinociception, but not hypotension, in sheep

Intrathecally administered clonidine produces analgesia, but also produces hypotension. To assess the effects of epidural administration, the authors inserted lumbar epidural catheters in seven nonpregnant ewes, and injected, on separate days, clonidine (50-750 mcg), morphine (5-10 mg), and a clonidine-morphine combination (clonidine 150 mcg + morphine 5 mg). Clonidine produced dose-dependent antinociception and sedation, with the lowest maximally effective antinociceptive dose being 300 mcg. Morphine produced less intense antinociception than clonidine, and did not potentiate clonidine's effect. Antinociception, but not sedation, following clonidine injection was reversed by epidural injection of the alpha 2-adrenergic antagonist, idazoxan. Epidurally administered naloxone and prazosin did not reverse clonidine's antinociceptive effect, nor did intravenously administered idazoxan. Epidurally administered clonidine did not decrease blood pressure or heart rate or affect arterial blood gas tensions or spinal cord histology. These data suggest that epidurally administered clonidine produces analgesia by a local, alpha 2-adrenergic mechanism. In sheep, epidurally administered clonidine does not produce hypotension.     

Antinociceptive Response to Nitrous Oxide Is Mediated by Supraspinal Opiate and Spinal alpha sub 2 Adrenergic Receptors in the Rat

Background: Despite nearly 150 years of clinical use, the mechanism(s) of action of nitrous oxide (N2 O) remains in doubt. In some but not all studies the analgesic properties of N2 O can be attenuated by opiate receptor antagonists. The purported mechanism for the opiate antagonistic effect relates to the finding that N2 O increases supraspinal levels of endogenous opiates, although this finding has been disputed. Based on the observations that (1) N2 O promotes the release of catecholamines, including the endogenous alpha sub 2 adrenergic agonist norepinephrine, and (2) that descending noradrenergic inhibitory pathways are activated by opioid analgesics, this study sought to determine whether alpha2 adrenergic receptors are involved in the antinociceptive action of nitrous oxide.

Methods: Institutional approval was obtained for the study. Rats breathed 70% N2 O and 30% Oxygen2 in an enclosed chamber. After a 30-min exposure, significant antinociception was indicated by an increase in the latency response to a noxious stimulus (tail-flick latency). The tail-flick latency was tested in rats exposed to 70% N2 O after either systemic or regional (intrathecal or intracerebroventricular) injections with either competitive (atipamezole; yohimbine) or noncompetitive (N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline) alpha2 adrenoceptor antagonists, or the opiate receptor antagonist naloxone.

Results: When administered systemically, both the opiate (naloxone) and alpha2 adrenoceptor antagonists (atipamezole, yohimbine, and N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline) blocked the enhanced tail-flick latency response to N2 O. Naloxone administered intracerebroventricularly, but not intrathecally, blocked the enhanced tail-flick latency response to N2 O. Conversely, atipamezole administered intrathecally, but not intracerebroventricularly, blocked the enhanced tail-flick latency response to N2 O.     

An isobolographic analysis of the adrenergic modulation of diclofenac antinociception

We evaluated the noradrenergic modulation of the antinociceptive activity of diclofenac in mice using the acetic acid writhing test. Dose-response curves were obtained for the antinociceptive effect of diclofenac, phenylephrine, clonidine, desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine administered both systemically and intrathecally, and ED(50)s were calculated. Noradrenergic modulation was evaluated by performing an isobolographic analysis of the systemic or intrathecal coadministration of fixed-ratio combinations of diclofenac with each adrenergic drug. The systemic, but not the intrathecal, combinations of diclofenac with phenylephrine or clonidine showed supraadditivity, suggesting that the activation of alpha(1) and alpha(2) adrenoceptors interfered with the nociceptive transmission at spinal and supraspinal levels. Supraadditive effects were not demonstrated for the intrathecal injection of diclofenac combined with phenylephrine, clonidine and a selective norepinephrine uptake inhibitor (desipramine) or adrenergic antagonists. We conclude that interaction between adrenoceptors and diclofenac can modulate antinociception by activating common or different mechanisms. Diclofenac has an antinociceptive activity that, in addition to cyclooxygenase inhibition, can be modulated by additive and supraadditive interactions with adrenergic drugs. IMPLICATIONS: Diclofenac analgesia in mice can be modulated by interaction with adrenergic drugs. The systemic but not the intrathecal administration of phenylephrine and clonidine produced supraadditive interactions. For desipramine, prazosin, and yohimbine, supraadditive interactions were not statistically demonstrated. The coadministration of drugs inducing supraadditive effects could be clinically relevant for the treatment of chronic pain because of reduction of doses and side effects.     

Production of Paradoxical Sensory Hypersensitivity by α2-Adrenoreceptor Agonists

Background: Administration of opioid receptor agonists is followed by paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity. This hypersensitivity has been suggested to contribute to the antinociceptive tolerance observed with opioids. The authors hypothesized that [alpha]2-adrenoreceptor agonists, which also produce antinociceptive tolerance, would produce sensory hypersensitivity.

Methods: [alpha]2-Adrenoreceptor agonists were administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats as a single subcutaneous injection, a continuous subcutaneous infusion, a single intrathecal injection, or a continuous intrathecal infusion. Thermal sensitivity was determined using latency to withdrawal of the hind paw from radiant heat. Tactile sensitivity was determined using withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments. Spinal dynorphin content was measured by enzyme immunoassay.

Results: Single systemic or intrathecal injections of clonidine or dexmedetomidine produced antinociception followed by delayed thermal and tactile hypersensitivity. Six-day systemic or intrathecal infusion of clonidine produced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity observed even during clonidine infusion. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by coadministration of the [alpha]2-adrenoreceptor-selective antagonist idazoxan or the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-selective antagonist MK-801. Six-day infusion of intrathecal clonidine increased dynorphin content in dorsal lumbar spinal cord. MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum reversed clonidine-induced sensory hypersensitivity.     

Production of paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity by alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists

BACKGROUND: Administration of opioid receptor agonists is followed by paradoxical sensory hypersensitivity. This hypersensitivity has been suggested to contribute to the antinociceptive tolerance observed with opioids. The authors hypothesized that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists, which also produce antinociceptive tolerance, would produce sensory hypersensitivity. METHODS: alpha 2-Adrenoreceptor agonists were administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats as a single subcutaneous injection, a continuous subcutaneous infusion, a single intrathecal injection, or a continuous intrathecal infusion. Thermal sensitivity was determined using latency to withdrawal of the hind paw from radiant heat. Tactile sensitivity was determined using withdrawal threshold to von Frey filaments. Spinal dynorphin content was measured by enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Single systemic or intrathecal injections of clonidine or dexmedetomidine produced antinociception followed by delayed thermal and tactile hypersensitivity. Six-day systemic or intrathecal infusion of clonidine produced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity observed even during clonidine infusion. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by coadministration of the alpha 2-adrenoreceptor-selective antagonist idazoxan or the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-selective antagonist MK-801. Six-day infusion of intrathecal clonidine increased dynorphin content in dorsal lumbar spinal cord. MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum reversed clonidine-induced sensory hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: alpha 2-Adrenoreceptor agonists produce sensory hypersensitivity that may be analogous to that produced by opioids. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented by idazoxan, demonstrating that it is mediated by alpha 2 receptors. Clonidine infusion increased spinal dynorphin content. Sensory hypersensitivity was prevented or reversed by MK-801 and dynorphin antiserum, implicating N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and spinal dynorphin in its production. Clinicians should be mindful of the possibility of drug-induced hyperalgesia in patients treated with alpha 2-adrenoreceptor agonists.     

Antagonism of antinociception produced by intrathecal clonidine by ketorolac in the rat: the role of the opioid system

The management of severe pain may require "balanced analgesia," involving the use of analgesics with different modes of action. Clonidine, an alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor agonist produces analgesia by itself as well as when given with morphine and local anesthetics. Ketorolac is indicated for the management of moderately severe acute pain and causes analgesia equivalent to morphine. This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of ketorolac promotes antinociception produced by intrathecal administration of clonidine in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Intrathecal injection of clonidine (1-30 microg) induced a dose-dependent increase in antinociception as measured by the tail flick (TF) and hot plate tests. Ketorolac alone (150-600 microg) increased the antinociception by 50%-60% only in the TF test. Ketorolac (10 microg) decreased clonidine (10 microg)-induced antinociception from 69.1% +/- 7.8% to 23.5% +/- 1. 6% (P < 0.05) in the TF test and 35.7% +/- 4.7% to 4.5% +/- 0.1% (P < 0.05) maximum possible effect in the hot plate test. Ketorolac also antagonized the effect of 30 microg of clonidine. The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone antagonized the antinociceptive effect of clonidine and ketorolac, indicating the involvement of the opioid system in the antinociception produced by clonidine or ketorolac. However, neither clonidine nor ketorolac (10(-8) to 10(-3) M) inhibited the binding of specific ligands to mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors, indicating a lack of direct interaction of clonidine and ketorolac with opioid receptors. These results suggest that intrathecal injection of ketorolac antagonizes the antinociception produced by clonidine.     

Intrathecal adenosine: interactions with spinal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Spinal adenosine receptor agonists exert antinociception in animal models of acute and chronic pain, but adenosine itself has not been examined. The authors tested the antinociceptive and antihypersensitivity interactions of intrathecal adenosine and its interactions with intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute thermal nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity. METHODS: Rats were prepared with lumbar intrathecal catheters. Responses to acute noxious stimulation were evaluated by latency to paw withdrawal from a radiant heat source focused on the hind paw. Postoperative hypersensitivity was measured after an incision in the rat hind paw by application of von Frey filaments to the heel adjacent to the wound. An isobolographic design was used to distinguish between additive and synergistic drug interactions. RESULTS: Spinal administration of clonidine and neostigmine, but not adenosine, produced dose-dependent antinociception to noxious thermal stimulation. Addition of adenosine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not neostigmine. In contrast, each of these three agents alone reversed postoperative hypersensitivity. Pretreatment with the alpha-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine completely reversed adenosine's antihypersensitivity action. Adenosine interacted synergistically with neostigmine and additively with clonidine in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that intrathecal adenosine by itself has no antinociceptive properties to acute noxious thermal stimulation in rats, but enhances clonidine's antinociception. In contrast, intrathecal adenosine is active against postoperative hypersensitivity by an adrenergic mechanism. Different interactions between adenosine, clonidine, and neostigmine in acute nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity models are consistent with altered central processing of sensory information after peripheral injury.     

Nitrous Oxide Produces Antinociceptive Response via [small alpha, Greek]2B and/or [small alpha, Greek]2C Adrenoceptor Subtypes in Mice

Background: Opiate receptors in the periaqueductal gray region and [small alpha, Greek]2 adrenoceptors in the spinal cord of the rat mediate the antinociceptive properties of nitrous oxide (N2 O). The availability of genetically altered mice facilitates the detection of the precise protein species involved in the transduction pathway. In this study, the authors establish the similarity between rats and mice in the antinociceptive action of N2 O and investigate which [small alpha, Greek]2 adrenoceptor subtypes mediate this response.

Methods: After obtaining institutional approval, antinociceptive dose-response and time-course to N2 O was measured in wild-type and transgenic mice (D79N), with a nonfunctional [small alpha, Greek]2A adrenoceptor using tail-flick latency. The antinociceptive effect of N2 O was tested after pretreatment systemically with yohimbine (nonselective [small alpha, Greek]2 antagonist), naloxone (opiate antagonist), L659,066 (peripheral [small alpha, Greek]2-antagonist) and prazosin ([small alpha, Greek]2B- and [small alpha, Greek] (2C-selective) antagonist). The tail-flick latency to dexmedetomidine (D-med), a nonselective [small alpha, Greek]2 agonist, was tested in wild-type and transgenic mice.

Results: N2 O produced antinociception in both D79N transgenic and wild-type litter mates, although the response was less pronounced in the transgenic mice. Antinociception from N2 O decreased over time with continuing exposure, and the decrement was more pronounced in the transgenic mice. The antinociceptive response could be dose dependently antagonized by opiate receptor and selective [small alpha, Greek]2B-/[small alpha, Greek]2C-receptor antagonists but not by a central nervous system-impermeant [small alpha, Greek]2 antagonist (L659,066). Whereas dexmedetomidine exhibited no antinociceptive response in the D79N mice, the robust antinociceptive response in the wild-type litter mates could not be blocked by a selective [small alpha, Greek]2B-/[small alpha, Greek]2C-receptor antagonist.     

Interaction between opiate subtype and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists in suppression of noxiously evoked activity of WDR neurons in the spinal dorsal horn.

Several studies have demonstrated synergistic antinociception following low-dose administration of morphine and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists at the spinal level. This study was carried out in order to identify the opiate subtypes that are likely to be involved in such synergistic suppression of noxiously evoked activity of wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. We also examined the effect of opiate antagonists and alpha-2 adrenergic antagonists on the suppression produced by opiate or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists. Extracellular activity of single WDR neurons in the spinal dorsal horn, which was evoked by a radiant heat stimulus (51 degrees C), was recorded in decerebrate, spinally transected cats. Agonists were administered spinally and antagonists intravenously. In the synergism study, ineffective doses of the moderately selective mu agonist morphine (25 micrograms), the delta agonist DADL (20 micrograms), and the selective delta agonist DPDPE (30 micrograms), when combined with an ineffective dose of the alpha-2 adrenergic agonist clonidine (5 micrograms) produced significant synergistic suppression of noxiously evoked WDR neuronal activity. However, the ineffective or slightly effective dose of the selective mu agonist DAGO (1 or 1.5 micrograms, respectively) did not show any synergistic action with clonidine. Furthermore, the synergism between morphine and clonidine was reversed by the selective delta antagonist ICI 174,864. We interpret these results to indicate that opiates interact at spinal delta receptors to produce a synergistic suppression of evoked WDR neuronal activity in the presence of spinal clonidine. An alternative explanation is that ICI 174,864 may interact in some way with alpha-adrenergic systems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Peripheral Nerve Injury Alters the α2 Adrenoceptor Subtype Activated by Clonidine for Analgesia

Background: Previous studies suggest that the [alpha]2A adrenoceptor subtype is the target for spinally administered [alpha]2-adrenergic agonists, i.e., clonidine, for pain relief. However, ST 91, a preferential [alpha]2 NON-A adrenoceptor subtype agonist, induces antinociception, and intrathecally administered [alpha]2C antisense oligodeoxynucleotide decreases antinociception induced by clonidine in the rat, suggesting non-A sites may be important as well. Therefore, the authors examined the subtype of [alpha]2 adrenoceptor activated by clonidine and ST 91 in normal rats and those with nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity.

Methods: The same mechanical stimulus was applied to normal rats and those following spinal nerve ligation, and the effect of intrathecal clonidine and ST 91 on withdrawal threshold to the stimulus was determined. To further examine subtypes, animals were spinally pretreated with vehicle, BRL 44408 (an [alpha]2A subtype-preferring antagonist), and ARC 239 (an [alpha]2 NON-A subtype-preferring antagonist).

Results: In normal animals, clonidine's effect was diminished by pretreatment with either antagonist, whereas ST 91's antinociceptive effect was solely blocked by pretreatment with ARC 239. In nerve-injured animals, the antihypersensitivity action of both clonidine and ST 91 was blocked by administration of ARC 239, whereas BRL 44408 was ineffective.     

Intrathecal clonidine: analgesia and effect on opiate withdrawal in the rat

Clonidine, an alpha 2 adrenergic agonist, has analgesic properties and recently has been used to suppress opiate withdrawal. These two properties theoretically make it a suitable analgesic substitute in patients tolerant to opioids. The objectives of this study were to see if intrathecal clonidine is analgesic and whether it can modify morphine withdrawal at the spinal level. Rats chronically implanted with catheters in the lumbar subarachnoid space were utilized. In analgesia experiments, intrathecal clonidine produced analgesia with the peak effect in the paw-lick test occurring at 200nM, and in the tail-flick test analgesia was apparent at 100 nM and peaked at 400 nM (in 10 microL Ringer's lactate). In dependency experiments, animals dependent on morphine (300 mg X kg-1) received intrathecal clonidine 25, 50, 200 nM in 10 microliter Ringer's lactate 72 h after morphine. Following this, a naloxone challenge, 3 mg X kg-1 was administered and withdrawal assessed. Clonidine-treated animals showed significant weight loss and decrease in temperature, and those treated with high doses showed marked hypothermia and hind-limb flaccidity. Intrathecal clonidine prevented the hyperalgesia associated with opiate withdrawal but did not affect the occurrence of the majority of behavioral signs (e.g., piloerection, irritability) associated with morphine withdrawal. Intrathecal clonidine prevented the naloxone-induced increase in blood pressure during withdrawal and in animals not treated with morphine-produced hypotension. Thus, intrathecal clonidine is analgesic, and part of the antiwithdrawal action of clonidine may be exerted at the spinal level.     

Peripheral nerve injury alters the alpha2 adrenoceptor subtype activated by clonidine for analgesia

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that the alpha adrenoceptor subtype is the target for spinally administered alpha -adrenergic agonists, clonidine, for pain relief. However, ST 91, a preferential alpha adrenoceptor subtype agonist, induces antinociception, and intrathecally administered alpha antisense oligodeoxynucleotide decreases antinociception induced by clonidine in the rat, suggesting non-A sites may be important as well. Therefore, the authors examined the subtype of alpha adrenoceptor activated by clonidine and ST 91 in normal rats and those with nerve injury-induced hypersensitivity. METHODS: The same mechanical stimulus was applied to normal rats and those following spinal nerve ligation, and the effect of intrathecal clonidine and ST 91 on withdrawal threshold to the stimulus was determined. To further examine subtypes, animals were spinally pretreated with vehicle, BRL 44408 (an alpha subtype-preferring antagonist), and ARC 239 (an alpha subtype-preferring antagonist). RESULTS: In normal animals, clonidine's effect was diminished by pretreatment with either antagonist, whereas ST 91's antinociceptive effect was solely blocked by pretreatment with ARC 239. In nerve-injured animals, the antihypersensitivity action of both clonidine and ST 91 was blocked by administration of ARC 239, whereas BRL 44408 was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: These data agree with previous studies supporting that the alpha adrenoceptor is important to the antinociceptive effect of clonidine in normal animals. Nerve injury alters this and results in a total reliance on alpha adrenoceptors.     

Intrathecal Adenosine: Interactions with Spinal Clonidine and Neostigmine in Rat Models of Acute Nociception and Postoperative Hypersensitivity

Background: Spinal adenosine receptor agonists exert antinociception in animal models of acute and chronic pain, but adenosine itself has not been examined. The authors tested the antinociceptive and antihypersensitivity interactions of intrathecal adenosine and its interactions with intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine in rat models of acute thermal nociception and postoperative hypersensitivity.

Methods: Rats were prepared with lumbar intrathecal catheters. Responses to acute noxious stimulation were evaluated by latency to paw withdrawal from a radiant heat source focused on the hind paw. Postoperative hypersensitivity was measured after an incision in the rat hind paw by application of von Frey filaments to the heel adjacent to the wound. An isobolographic design was used to distinguish between additive and synergistic drug interactions.

Results: Spinal administration of clonidine and neostigmine, but not adenosine, produced dose-dependent antinociception to noxious thermal stimulation. Addition of adenosine enhanced the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not neostigmine. In contrast, each of these three agents alone reversed postoperative hypersensitivity. Pretreatment with the [Greek small letter alpha]-adrenergic antagonist phentolamine completely reversed adenosine's antihypersensitivity action. Adenosine interacted synergistically with neostigmine and additively with clonidine in reducing postoperative hypersensitivity.     

A comparison of the antinociceptive and behavioral effects of intrathecally administered opiates, alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, and local anesthetics in mice and rats

This study was undertaken to compare the antinociceptive and behavioral effects of intrathecally administered opiates, alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, and local anesthetics injected by lumbar puncture in the mouse and rat. Antinociception was determined by observing the response to a clamp applied to the tail (Haffner test) of the mouse and by the rat tail-flick test; log dose-response curves for antinociception were generated for each drug in each test. Motor coordination and other behavioral effects were also observed. Morphine and fentanyl (mu-opiate agonists) as well as ethylketocyclazocine (EKC) and U50488H (kappa-opiate agonists), together with buprenorphine (partial mu-opiate agonist) and the alpha-2-adrenergic agonist clonidine, all produced antinociception in both species without causing significant behavioral or motor dysfunctions at antinociceptive doses. Xylazine (also an alpha-2-adrenergic agonist), ketamine, procaine, and lidocaine inhibited responses but only at doses that also produced motor impairment or paralysis. Nalbuphine (mixed opiate agonist-antagonist) was without any effect in both species. These data suggest that the mu- and kappa-opiate agonists and clonidine are the preferred agents for producing antinociception without compromising motor function.     

Synergistic Antinociceptive Interactions of Morphine and Clonidine in Rats with Nerve-ligation Injury

Background: Ligation injury of the L5/L6 nerve roots in rats produces behavioral signs representative of clinical conditions of neuropathic pain, including tactile allodynia and thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia. In this model, intrathecal morphine shows no antiallodynic activity, as well as decreased antinociceptive potency and efficacy. This study was designed to explore the antinociceptive activity of intrathecal clonidine alone or in combination with intrathecal morphine (1:3 fixed ratio) in nerve-injured rats. The aims, with this study, were to use nerve-injured animals to determine: (1) whether the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of intrathecal clonidine was altered, and (2) whether the combination of intrathecal morphine and clonidine would act synergistically to produce antinociception.

Methods: Unilateral nerve injury was produced by ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal roots of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Sham-operated rats underwent a similar surgical procedure but without nerve ligation. Morphine and clonidine were given intrathecally through implanted catheters alone or in a 1:3 fixed ratio. Nociceptive responses were measured by recording tail withdrawal latency from a 55 degrees Celsius water bath, and data were calculated as % maximal possible effect (%MPE).

Results: Morphine produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in both sham-operated and nerve-injured rats. The doses calculated to produce a 50 %MPE (i.e., A50) (+/- 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were 15 +/- 4.9 micro gram and 30 +/- 18 micro gram, respectively. Though morphine was able to produce a maximal response (100%) in sham-operated rats, the maximal response achieved in nerve-injured animals was only 69 +/- 21.9 %MPE. Clonidine produced a dose-dependent effect, with an A50 (+/- 95% CI) of 120 +/- 24 micro gram in sham-operated rats. In nerve-ligated rats, clonidine produced a maximal effect that reached a plateau of 55 +/- 10.9 %MPE and 49 +/- 10.2 %MPE at 100 and 200 micro gram, respectively, preventing the calculation of an A50. In sham-operated rats, a morphine-clonidine mixture produced maximal efficacy, with an A50 (+/- 95% CI) of 15 +/- 9.2 micro gram (total dose), significantly less than the theoretical additive A50 of 44 +/- 10 micro gram. In L5/L6 nerve-ligated rats, the morphine-clonidine combination produced maximal efficacy, with an A50 (+/- 95% CI) of 11 +/- 5.4 micro gram (total dose), which was significantly less than the theoretical additive A50 of 118 +/- 73 micro gram, indicating a synergistic antinociceptive interaction. The intrathecal injection of [D-Ala2, NMePhe4, Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) produced A50 values of 0.23 micro gram (range, 0.09-0.6) and 0.97 micro gram (range, 0.34-2.7) in sham-operated and ligated rats, respectively. Phentolamine (4 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) produced no antinociceptive effect alone and attenuated, rather than enhanced, the effect of morphine in both groups of rats.     

Intrathecal ketorolac enhances antinociception from clonidine

Although both alpha2-adrenergic agonists and cyclooxygenase inhibitors produce analgesia, their exact sites of action and interaction remain unclear. A previous report demonstrated a surprising inhibition of antinociception in rats from intrathecal clonidine by co-administered ketorolac. There are no other reports of interaction between these two classes of analgesics. We therefore reexamined this interaction, determining the effect of intrathecal clonidine and ketorolac alone and in combination in normal rats. Clonidine, but not ketorolac, produced antinociception to noxious hind paw thermal stimulation. The addition of ketorolac significantly enhanced the effect of clonidine, indicating a synergistic interaction for analgesia. Although the reasons for the discrepancy between this and the previous report are unclear, these results are consistent with previous studies that indicate an antinociceptive action of intrathecal alpha2-adrenergic agonists in the normal condition, a lack of such effect for cyclooxygenase inhibitors, and positive reinforcing effects of these two systems when co-stimulated. IMPLICATIONS: Spinal injection of the alpha2-adrenergic agonist clonidine and the cyclooxygenase inhibitor ketorolac results in a synergistic interaction for antinociception in normal animals, suggesting that the combination of these drugs will enhance rather than detract from the analgesia of either alone.     

Dextromethorphan potentiates morphine antinociception at the spinal level in rats

PURPOSE: Morphine is an effective analgesic, but adverse effects limit its clinical use in higher doses. The non-opioid antitussive, dextromethorphan (DM), can potentiate the analgesic effect of morphine and decrease the dose of morphine in acute postoperative pain, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We previously observed that DM increases the serum concentration of morphine in rats. Therefore, we investigated the effects of drugs administered at the spinal level to exclude possible pharmacokinetic interactions. As DM has widespread binding sites in the central nervous system [such as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, sigma receptors and alpha(3)ss(4) nicotinic receptors], we investigated whether the potentiation of morphine antinociception by DM at the spinal level is related to NMDA receptors. METHODS: We used MK-801 as a tool to block the NMDA channel first, and then studied the interaction between intrathecal (i.t.) morphine and DM. The tail-flick test was used to examine the antinociceptive effects of different combinations of morphine and other drugs in rats. RESULTS: DM (2-20 microg) or MK-801 (5-15 microg) showed no significant antinociceptive effect by themselves. The antinociceptive effect of morphine (0.5 microg, i.t.) was significantly enhanced by DM and reached the maximal potentiation (43.7%-50.4%) at doses of 2 to 10 microg. Pretreatment with MK-801 (5 or 10 microg, i.t.) significantly potentiated morphine antinociception by 49.9% or 38.7%, respectively. When rats were pretreated with MK-801, DM could not further enhance morphine antinociception (45.7% vs 50.5% and 43.3%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that spinal NMDA receptors play an important role in the effect of DM to potentiate morphine antinociception.     

Isoflurane and nociception: spinal alpha2A adrenoceptors mediate antinociception while supraspinal alpha1 adrenoceptors mediate pronociception

BACKGROUND: The authors recently established that the analgesic actions of the inhalation anesthetic nitrous oxide were mediated by noradrenergic bulbospinal neurons and spinal alpha2B adrenoceptors. They now determined whether noradrenergic brainstem nuclei and descending spinal pathways are responsible for the antinociceptive actions of the inhalation anesthetic isoflurane, and which alpha adrenoceptors mediate this effect. METHODS: After selective lesioning of noradrenergic nuclei by intracerebroventricular application of the mitochondrial toxin saporin coupled to the antibody directed against dopamine beta hydroxylase (DbetaH-saporin), the antinociceptive action of isoflurane was determined. Antagonists for the alpha1 and alpha2 adrenoceptors were injected at spinal and supraspinal sites in intact and spinally transected rats to identify the noradrenergic pathways mediating isoflurane antinociception. Null mice for each of the three alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha2A, alpha2B, and alpha2C) and their wild-type cohorts were tested for their antinociceptive response to isoflurane. RESULTS: Both DbetaH-saporin treatment and chronic spinal transection enhanced the antinociceptive effects of isoflurane. The alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin also enhanced isoflurane antinociception at a supraspinal site of action. The alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine inhibited isoflurane antinociception, and this effect was mediated by spinal alpha2 adrenoceptors. Null mice for the alpha2A-adrenoceptor subtype showed a reduced antinociceptive response to isoflurane. CONCLUSIONS: The authors suggest that, at clinically effective concentrations, isoflurane can modulate nociception via three different mechanisms: (1) a pronociceptive effect requiring descending spinal pathways, brainstem noradrenergic nuclei, and supraspinal alpha1 adrenoceptors; (2) an antinociceptive effect requiring descending noradrenergic neurons and spinal alpha2A adrenoceptors; and (3) an antinociceptive effect mediated within the spinal cord for which no role for adrenergic mechanism has been found.     

Spinal Endogenous Acetylcholine Contributes to the Analgesic Effect of Systemic Morphine in Rats

Background: Systemic morphine is known to cause increased release of acetylcholine in the spinal cord. Intrathecal injection of the cholinergic receptor agonists or acetylcholinesterase inhibitors produces antinociception in both animals and humans. In the present study, we explored the functional importance of spinal endogenous acetylcholine in the analgesic action produced by intravenous morphine.

Methods: Rats were implanted with intravenous and intrathecal catheters. The antinociceptive effect of morphine was determined by the paw-withdrawal latency in response to a radiant heat stimulus after intrathecal treatment with atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), mecamylamine (a nicotinic receptor antagonist), or cholinergic neurotoxins (ethylcholine mustard aziridinium ion [AF64A] and hemicholinium-3).

Results: Intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg morphine increased significantly the paw-withdrawal latency. Intrathecal pretreatment with 30 [mu]g atropine (n = 7) or 50 [mu]g mecamylamine (n = 6) both attenuated significantly the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The inhibitory effect of atropine on the effect of morphine was greater than that of mecamylamine. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of morphine was significantly reduced in rats pretreated with intrathecal AF64A (n = 7) or hemicholinium-3 (n = 6) to inhibit the high-affinity choline transporter and acetylcholine synthesis. We found that intrathecal AF64A reduced significantly the [3H]hemicholinium-3 binding sites but did not affect its affinity in the dorsal spinal cord.