Stereotactic body radiotherapy for multisite extracranial oligometastases: final report of a dose escalation trial in patients with 1 to 5 sites of metastatic disease

BACKGROUND:

A subset of patients with metastatic cancer in limited organs may benefit from metastasis‐directed therapy. The authors investigated whether patients with limited metastases could be safely treated with metastasis‐directed radiotherapy.

METHODS:

Patients with 1 to 5 metastatic cancer sites with a life expectancy of >3 months received escalating stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) doses to all known cancer sites. Patients were followed radiographically with CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and metabolically with fluorodeoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography, 1 month after treatment, and then every 3 months. Acute toxicities were scored using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, and late toxicities were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity scoring system.

RESULTS:

Sixty‐one patients with 113 metastases were enrolled from November 2004 to November 2009 on a prospective radiation dose escalation study. Median follow‐up was 20.9 months. Patients tolerated treatment well; the maximal tolerated dose was not reached in any cohort. Eleven patients (18.3%) have not progressed. One and 2‐year progression‐free survival are 33.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.8‐46.1) and 22.0% (95% CI, 12.8‐34.4); 1‐year and 2‐year overall survival are 81.5% (95% CI, 71.1‐91.1) and 56.7% (95% CI, 43.9‐68.9). Seventy‐two percent of patients whose tumors progressed did so in limited (1‐3) metastatic sites.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with 1 to 5 metastases can be safely treated to multiple body sites and may benefit from SBRT. Further investigation should focus on patient selection. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Preliminary outcome and toxicity report of extended-field, intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to report a preliminary analysis of our initial clinical experience with extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 2002 and May 2005, 13 women with gynecologic malignancies were treated with extended-field radiation therapy. Of the women, 7 had endometrial cancer, 4 cervical cancer, 1 recurrent endometrial cancer, and 1 suspected cervical cancer. All women underwent computed tomography planning, with the upper vagina, parametria, and uterus (if present) contoured within the CTV. In addition, the clinical target volume contained the pelvic and presacral lymph nodes as well as the para-aortic lymph nodes. All acute toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 3.0). All late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity score. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 11 months. Extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies was well tolerated. Two patients experienced Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Both patients were treated with concurrent cisplatin based chemotherapy. Neither patient was planned with bone marrow sparing. Eleven patients had no evidence of late toxicity. One patient with multiple previous surgeries experienced a bowel obstruction. One patient with bilateral grossly involved and unresectable common iliac nodes experienced bilateral lymphedema. Extended-field-IMRT achieved good local control with only 1 patient, who was metastatic at presentation, and 1 patient not able to complete treatment, experiencing in-field failure. CONCLUSIONS: Extended-field IMRT is safe and effective with a low incidence of acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to assess chronic toxicity, although early results are promising.     

Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial.

PURPOSE: In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients. RESULTS: Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher's exact test, P <.0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P <.0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (chi2 test, P <.001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate. CONCLUSION: For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.     

Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Patients With Limited Prostate Cancer Metastases: Deferring Androgen Deprivation Therapy

BackgroundWe investigated whether repeated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of oligometastatic disease is able to defer the initiation of palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with low-volume bone and lymph node metastases.Patients and MethodsPatients with up to 3 synchronous metastases (bone and/or lymph nodes) diagnosed on positron emission tomography, following biochemical recurrence after local curative treatment, were treated with (repeated) SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 10 fractions. Androgen deprivation therapy-free survival (ADT-FS) defined as the time interval between the first day of SBRT and the initiation of ADT was the primary end point. ADT was initiated if more than 3 metastases were detected during follow-up even when patients were still asymptomatic or in case of a prostate specific antigen elevation above 50 ng/mL in the absence of metastases. Secondary end points were local control, clinical progression-free survival, and toxicity. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.ResultsWe treated 24 patients with a median follow-up of 24 months. Ten patients started with ADT resulting in a median ADT-FS of 38 months. The 2-year local control and clinical progression-free survival was 100% and 42%, respectively. Eleven and 3 patients, respectively, required a second and third salvage treatment for metachronous low-volume metastatic disease. No grade 3 toxicity was observed.ConclusionRepeated salvage SBRT is feasible, well tolerated and defers palliative ADT with a median of 38 months in patients with limited bone or lymph node PCa metastases.     

Radical radiation therapy for oligometastatic breast cancer: Results of a prospective phase II trial

Background and purpose

We conducted a prospective phase II multicentric trial to determine if radical radiation therapy to all metastatic sites might improve the progression-free survival (PFS) in oligometastatic breast cancer patients. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

Combination hormone therapy for metastatic breast cancer. An ECOG study of megestrol and aminoglutethimide

This study was performed to determine the toxicity and effectiveness of megestrol acetate used with aminoglutethimide-hydrocortisone in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Forty-five patients were treated, 29 of whom were fully eligible. Twelve of the 45 who had diabetes and/or hypertension were also analyzed. All had measurable sites of disease. The median age was 63 years, and the median time from first recurrence to on-study was 19 months. Approximately half the patients already had chemotherapy, and about 90% had hormone therapy for advanced disease. The most common side effects were skin rash, weight gain, hyperglycemia, and renal and neurologic problems. No life-threatening or lethal toxicities were reported. The overall response rate (complete or partial) among the fully eligible patients was 34% (90% confidence intervals from 20% to 51%), with a 5-month median duration of response. Patients with soft tissue, visceral, and osseous disease responded. Seventy-two percent of fully eligible patients have progressed or relapsed. The median time to failure of treatment was 6 months, and the median survival time was 15 months.     

A phase II study of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable advanced breast cancer responding to standard-dose therapy.

PURPOSE: The study was designed to determine the duration of complete response (CR) for patients with unresectable or metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) while responding to conventional-dose therapy. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included histologically documented metastatic or unresectable breast cancer, at least a partial response (PR) to conventional-dose therapy, no prior pelvic radiotherapy, cumulative doxorubicin of less than 500 mg/m3, and physiologic age between 18 and 55 years. Patients with inadequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary, and/or cardiac function or tumor involvement of marrow or CNS were excluded. Cyclophosphamide 6,000 mg/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 were given by continuous infusion over 4 days. After recovery, sites of prior bulk disease were to be radiated or resected if feasible. RESULTS: Of 29 registered patients, one died of toxicity (3%; hemorrhage). CRs and PRs continued a median of 16 and 5 months after transplant, respectively (26 and 9 months from initiation of chemotherapy for metastatic disease). Of 10 patients transplanted in CR, four have not progressed at 17 to 31 months after transplantation (25 to 43 months after beginning standard-dose therapy). One of four patients with uptake on bone scan as their only sites of residual disease before transplant and one of three who converted from PR to CR with transplant have not progressed at 27 and 29 months, respectively, after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: CTCb is an intensification regimen with a low mortality that delivers a significantly increased dose of agents with known activity at conventional doses in breast cancer. Although the duration of PR is short as expected, CRs appear to be durable.     

Concomitant 5-FU, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with external beam radiation therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of alternate week concurrent 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and cisplatin with radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients received 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea and cisplatin with radiotherapy on an alternate week basis. Chemoradiotherapy was given day 1-5, and no therapy given day 6-14 for each 14 day cycle. Chemotherapy doses were as follows: hydroxyurea 1 mg every 12 h starting day 0, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days starting day 1, and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every other cycle. A radiation dose of 6000 cGy was prescribed. Acute toxicities were monitored and therapy modified for hematologic toxicity. Nine patients enrolled, however eight were evaluable; one patient expired prior to therapy. The median radiation dose delivered was 5540 cGy. Sixty-three percent required a chemotherapy dose reduction. Fifty percent achieved local control by radiographic imaging after completion of therapy. Median survival was 12 months. Acute toxicity included: 38% grade 2-3 nausea, 37% grade 2-3 vomiting, 63% grade 2-3 mucositis, 63% grade 2-3 neutropenia, and 88% grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Other sequelae included hand-foot syndrome, deep venous thrombosis, hearing loss, seizures, and anorexia. Patients achieved the same median survival as compared to other reported studies of radiation therapy with single agent 5-fluorouracil. We do not recommend this protocol due to the significant toxicity. Future studies to incorporate conformal radiation therapy with more active, less toxic chemotherapeutic agents should be investigated.     

Pelvic radiotherapy in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis: Refining the paradigm

Purpose

Conflicting results concerning the toxicity of radiotherapy in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis were reported in literature. This work describes the toxicity profiles of patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies at our institution.

Acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy

PURPOSE: To assess the acute toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for implant monotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level /= Grade 3, e.g., hourly nocturia, gross hematuria, diarrhea requiring parenteral support, narcotics for pain control, or catheterization for acute urinary retention, was observed. CONCLUSION: Although relatively high doses of radiation are delivered to prostate cancers with 3D-CRT compared with conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT is surprisingly well-tolerated. No patients in the cohort eligible for implant monotherapy experienced acute toxicity >/= Grade 3.     

Combined Radiotherapy and New Systemic Therapies – Have We Moved Beyond Palliation?

The new systemic therapies for cancer are having major impacts on the prognosis of patients with advanced cancers, some achieving long-term survival with targeted therapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Interactions of radiotherapy with the new systemic therapies are reviewed. Many agents increase radiosensitivity and particular caution is required combining BRAF inhibitors and radiotherapy because of significant toxicity. Most new systemic therapies can be used safely with palliative doses of radiotherapy, but it is important to be aware of overlapping toxicities depending on the site treated. DNA damage response modulators increase radiosensitivity and may potentially increase radiation toxicity but are at an earlier stage of development. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may produce further survival gains in patients responding to targeted therapy and immunotherapy.     

Feasibility of carbon‐ion radiotherapy for re‐irradiation of locoregionally recurrent,metastatic, or secondary lung tumors

Intrathoracic recurrence after carbon‐ion radiotherapy for primary or metastatic lung tumors remains a major cause of cancer‐related deaths. However, treatment options are limited. Herein, we report on the toxicity and efficacy of re‐irradiation with carbon‐ion radiotherapy for locoregionally recurrent, metastatic, or secondary lung tumors. Data of 95 patients with prior intrathoracic carbon‐ion radiotherapy who were treated with re‐irradiation with carbon‐ion radiotherapy at our institution between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy‐three patients (76.8%) had primary lung tumors and 22 patients (23.2%) had metastatic lung tumors. The median dose of initial carbon‐ion radiotherapy was 52.8 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and the median dose of re‐irradiation was 66.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). None of the patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow‐up period after re‐irradiation was 18 months. In terms of grade ≥3 toxicities, one patient experienced each of the following: grade 5 bronchopleural fistula, grade 4 radiation pneumonitis, grade 3 chest pain, and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. The 2‐year local control and overall survival rates were 54.0% and 61.9%, respectively. In conclusion, re‐irradiation with carbon‐ion radiotherapy was associated with relatively low toxicity and moderate efficacy. Re‐irradiation with carbon‐ion radiotherapy might be an effective treatment option for patients with locoregionally recurrent, metastatic, or secondary lung tumors.     

Safety of Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy after Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP): A Propensity Score Matched Pair Analysis

PurposeTo determine the genitourinary (GU) toxicity outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) who have undergone a prior transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and compare it to a similar non-TURP cohort.Materials and MethodsFifty prostate cancer patients who had undergone a single TURP, had a good baseline urinary function, and had been subsequently treated with SBRT were chosen from a prospectively maintained database. These were propensity score matched to a similar non-TURP cohort treated during the same period. Matching was done for diabetes mellitus and volume of radiation therapy. Acute GU and late GU toxicity were scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Stricture and incontinence were scored using Common Terminology for Common Adverse Events version 4.0.ResultsMedian follow-up for the entire cohort was 26 months (non-TURP vs TURP, 30 months vs 22 months, P = .34). The median duration between TURP and start of SBRT was 10 months. There was no significant difference between non-TURP versus TURP cohort in terms of RTOG acute GU toxicities grade ≥2 (8% vs 6%, P = .45), RTOG late GU toxicities grade ≥2 (8% vs 12%, P = .10), stricture rates (4% vs 6%, P = .64), and incontinence rates (0% vs 4%, P = .15). The median duration of time to late toxicity was 16 months vs 10 months (P = .12) in non-TURP and TURP cohort, respectively.ConclusionsAlthough modestly increased as compared with non-TURP patients, GU toxicities remains low with SBRT in post-TURP patients. SBRT can be safely performed in carefully selected post-TURP prostate cancer patients.     

Multicenter phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer in a phase II multicenter trial. Entry criteria were relatively liberal to reflect the heterogeneity of metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had histologically confirmed and measurable metastatic breast cancer. Up to two prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease, including prior therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes and prior high-dose therapy, were allowed. Paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) was administered weekly for 4 weeks per 4-week cycle. RESULTS: We enrolled 212 patients; 211 were assessable for toxicity and 177 were assessable for response. Ninety percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy (adjuvant, metastatic, or both), 46% of patients had three or more involved metastatic sites, and 60% of patients had visceral-dominant disease. Responses were documented on two occasions and were independently reviewed. The overall response rate (complete plus partial response) was 21.5% (95% confidence interval, 15.4% to 27.5%), with 41.8% of patients having disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 4.7 months, and overall survival in all 212 patients enrolled was 12.8 months. Therapy was well tolerated, with a 15% incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity and a 9% incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity; other serious toxicities were rare. The response rate and toxicity profile in the 34% of patients > or = 65 years of age were similar to that of younger patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated and demonstrated reasonable activity in this relatively heavily pretreated population with advanced disease. Further study of weekly paclitaxel in combination therapy is warranted.     

Docetaxel, capecitabine and carboplatin in metastatic esophagogastric cancer: a phase II study

PURPOSE: A Phase I investigation of docetaxel, carboplatin, and capecitabine at our institution demonstrated the safety and tolerability of this regimen in patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer. The objectives of this Phase II study were to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival for patients with metastatic esophagogastric cancer treated with this regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy na?ve patients with metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer received a regimen comprised of docetaxel 40 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8, carboplatin AUC = 2, Days 1 and 8, and capecitabine 2000 mg/m(2), Days 1-10 in 21-Day cycles. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Twelve of 25 patients (48 percent) had a Grade 3/4 toxicity. There were no Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities, and 1 patient (4 percent) had neutropenic fever. There were 3 complete responses, and 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48 percent. The median survival was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5-13 months), and the 1-year survival was 36 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel and carboplatin with capecitabine was an easily administered outpatient regimen. The response rate and 1-year survival were similar to more complex regimens. Future trials may investigate the substitution of carboplatin with more active agents.     

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: a regimen with unexpected early toxicity.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine that could be safely administered. We also sought to identify the toxicities associated with this treatment protocol. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with planned doses of radiation (59.4 Gy) and PVI of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/d) with gemcitabine doses of 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/wk. RESULTS: Two of three patients at the 100-mg/m(2)/wk dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), as did three of four at the 50-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. One patient experienced a mucocutaneous reaction described as a Stevens-Johnson syndrome that was attributed to chemotherapy. Three patients developed gastric or duodenal ulcers with severe bleeding requiring transfusion. One patient developed severe thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 4 weeks. Three of the five episodes of DLT developed at radiation doses < or = 36 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on this experience, we cannot recommend further investigation of regimens incorporating gemcitabine into regimens of radiation with PVI 5-FU. The mechanism of this synergistic toxicity remains to be determined.     

Correlation of toxicity with treatment parameters for 131I-CC49 radioimmunotherapy in three phase II clinical trials

Analyses were performed on 40 patients with TAG-72 expressing metastatic cancer who were entered into three phase II clinical trials. The dose selected was the maximum tolerated dose in phase I studies. Patients all had unresectable metastatic colon or prostate cancer and had recovered from prior therapies. Patients in trials #1 and #2 received 75 mCi/m2 131I-CC49 antibody whereas those in trial #3 received a total of 75 mCi/m2 with equal amounts of 131I-CC49 and 131I-COL-1. The three trials have resulted in a reproducible degree of reversible marrow suppression; 72.5% of patients experienced moderate or severe toxicity. Comparisons were made between demographic, clinical and pharmacokinetical variables and the grade of WBC toxicity, platelet toxicity and the sum of the two as total toxicity. Whole body radiation dose had a statistically significant relationship with platelet toxicity (r = 0.38, p = 0.015) and total toxicity (r = 0.34, p = 0.035). The bone marrow radiation dose is significantly related to all toxicity indicators with correlation coefficients with WBC and platelet toxicities of 0.47 (p = 0.002) and 0.34 (p = 0.033), respectively. Plasma half-life had the strongest correlation with WBC toxicity and combined toxicities. Multivariate models were developed to help describe the simultaneous effect of these variables on toxicity. The results show that the MTD dose was safely given to patients who varied in age, disease burden and degree of marrow compromise. This supports the contention that a fixed dose of radiolabeled antibody per body mass or m2 can be given to a diverse group of non-lymphoma patients with a predictable toxicity range.     

A phase II trial of a combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer who had previously received an anthracycline and a taxane in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting were treated with gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (intravenous; days 1 and 8) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (intravenous; day 8) every 21 days. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received a median of five cycles (range one to 22) of treatment and were followed until death or for a median of 28 months (range 19.4-36.6) among living patients. Fourteen partial responses for an overall response rate of 24% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16% to 39%] were documented. Nine (15%; CI 5% to 32%) patients had stable disease for >6 months. The median survival time was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.3-18.9) and the 1 year survival rate was 49% (95% CI 38% to 64%). The median time to progression was estimated to be 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.3). The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 83% and 27% of patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Other common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (17%), dyspnea (15%), rash (7%) and anorexia (5%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pemetrexed and gemcitabine is clinically active, with an overall response rate of 24% in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have previously been treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. Myelosuppression (66% grade 4 neutropenia and 14% febrile neutropenia) was the major treatment-related toxicity observed for this combination.     

High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients

To report the acute and late toxicity and preliminary biochemical outcomes in 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Between April 1996 and January 2001, 772 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with IMRT. Treatment was planned using an inverse-planning approach, and the desired beam intensity profiles were delivered by dynamic multileaf collimation. A total of 698 patients (90%) were treated to 81.0 Gy, and 74 patients (10%) were treated to 86.4 Gy. Acute and late toxicities were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity grading scales. PSA relapse was defined according to The American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology Consensus Statement. The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 6–60 months).

Thirty-five patients (4.5%) developed acute Grade 2 rectal toxicity, and no patient experienced acute Grade 3 or higher rectal symptoms. Two hundred seventeen patients (28%) developed acute Grade 2 urinary symptoms, and one experienced urinary retention (Grade 3). Eleven patients (1.5%) developed late Grade 2 rectal bleeding. Four patients (0.1%) experienced Grade 3 rectal toxicity requiring either one or more transfusions or a laser cauterization procedure. No Grade 4 rectal complications have been observed. The 3-year actuarial likelihood of ≥ late Grade 2 rectal toxicity was 4%. Seventy-two patients (9%) experienced late Grade 2 urinary toxicity, and five (0.5%) developed Grade 3 urinary toxicity (urethral stricture). The 3-year actuarial likelihood of ≥ late Grade 2 urinary toxicity was 15%. The 3-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival rates for favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable risk group patients were 92%, 86%, and 81%, respectively.

These data demonstrate the feasibility of high-dose IMRT in a large number of patients. Acute and late rectal toxicities seem to be significantly reduced compared with what has been observed with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques. Short-term PSA control rates seem to be at least comparable to those achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at similar dose levels. Based on this favorable risk:benefit ratio, IMRT has become the standard mode of conformal treatment delivery for localized prostate cancer at our institution.