Testing G-CSF responsiveness predicts the individual susceptibility to infection and consecutive treatment in recipients of high-dose chemotherapy

The individual risk of infection and requirements for medical treatment after high-dose chemotherapy have been unpredictable. In this prospective, multicenter, open-label study we investigated the potential of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) responsiveness as a predictor. A total of 168 patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma received a single dose of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim, 263 μg) after high-dose chemotherapy. Highly variable leukocyte peaks were measured and grouped as low (quartile 1; leukocytes 100-10 100/μL), medium (quartile 2; leukocytes > 10 100-18 300/μL), and high (quartiles 3/4; leukocytes > 18 300-44 800/μL). G-CSF responsiveness (low vs medium vs high) was inversely correlated with febrile neutropenia (77% vs 60% vs 48%; P = .0037); the rate of infection, including fever of unknown origin (91% vs 67% vs 54%; P < .0001); days with intravenous antibiotics (9 vs 6 vs 5; P < .0001); and antifungal therapy (P = .042). In multivariate analysis, G-CSF responsiveness remained the only factor significantly associated with infection (P = .016). In addition, G-CSF responsiveness was inversely correlated with grade 3/4 oral mucositis (67% vs 33% vs 23%; P < .0001). G-CSF responsiveness appears as a signature of the myeloid marrow reserve predicting defense against neutropenic infection after intensive chemotherapy. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01085058.     

A comparison of therapeutic schedules for administering granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to nonhuman primates after high-dose chemotherapy.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for reducing the period of neutropenia after chemotherapy. In this study, we compared the timing for initiating G-CSF administration after chemotherapy with the duration of neutropenia and hematopoietic regeneration. Nonhuman primates treated with high-dose chemotherapy (mechloroethamine, 1.5 mg/kg, intravenously) and not administered G-CSF therapy experienced 8 days of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] less than 1,000/mm3) and had an ANC nadir of 124 +/- 64/mm3 at day 7. Monkeys receiving G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d, subcutaneously) began treatment on either days 1, 3, 5, or 7 after chemotherapy. Monkeys treated with G-CSF had an earlier ANC recovery and the number of days with an ANC less than 500/mm3 and ANC less than 1,000/mm3 was reduced by approximately 50% in all treatment strategies. All G-CSF-treated animals, irrespective of the time that G-CSF was initiated, reached an ANC of 10,000/mm3 on day 13 +/- 1 day after chemotherapy. These results demonstrated that the duration of G-CSF therapy was almost twice as long for monkeys treated on day 1 as it was for monkeys that received therapy beginning on day 7. A comparison of the results for all treated monkeys identified a distinct difference in the responses of monkeys treated on day 1 from that of animals treated with G-CSF at later times. G-CSF initiated 1 day after chemotherapy led to an earlier onset of neutropenia and a more rapid and augmented recovery of myeloid progenitor cells in the peripheral blood when compared with control and delayed therapy groups. This study demonstrates that neutropenia due to a single dose of mechloroethamine can be equally reduced with both early and delayed initiation of G-CSF. Further, initiating G-CSF therapy after 7 days required approximately 50% less days of therapy to reach an appropriate termination point. The applicability of these findings to other chemotherapy regimens and for repeated cycles is uncertain and needs to be further evaluated. This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.     

Sustained G-CSF plasma levels following administration of pegfilgrastim fasten neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVE: Pegfilgrastim has shown to decrease the duration of severe neutropenia after conventional chemotherapy, but its use after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous blood stem cell transplantation has not been established yet. Therefore we studied the efficacy and the pharmacokinetic profile of pegfilgrastim in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. METHOD: In total, 21 patients received a single subcutaneous injection of 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day +1 after transplantation and pegfilgrastim plasma levels were measured daily by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clinical outcome was compared with pegfilgrastim levels of 282 plasma samples and data of a historical control group of patients without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim levels showed an inverse correlation (r = -0.68, p < 0.01) with neutrophil counts. Peak levels were reached at day +4 (94 ng/mL; range: 37-205) and were maintained until day +7 (85 ng/mL; range: 35-186). Comparison with the control group without G-CSF support showed that time to neutrophil reconstitution was significantly shorter in the pegfilgrastim group with 10 vs 15 days, respectively (p < 0.001). There was no correlation of pegfilgrastim levels and the duration of neutropenia, although patients with a fivefold increase in neutrophil counts the day after pegfilgrastim administration had a significantly shorter median duration of neutropenia in comparison to patients who were less susceptible to G-CSF stimulation (5 vs 7 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neutrophil reconstitution after high-dose chemotherapy could be accelerated by the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with myeloma. Responsiveness of neutrophils to pegfilgrastim before neutropenia was correlated with faster neutrophil reconstitution, whereas G-CSF levels had no impact on neutrophil recovery.     

Role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjunct therapy for septicemia in children with acute leukemia

The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to accelerate recovery from severe neutropenia and to decrease the incidence of documented infections after intensive chemotherapy in cancer patients. However, the routine prophylactic use of G-CSF is expensive. This study was conducted to determine the role of G-CSF as adjunct therapy for septicemia following neutropenia caused by chemotherapy in children with acute leukemia. Fifty consecutive episodes of septicemia were studied involving 34 episodes of Gram-negative, 7 episodes of Gram-positive, 5 episodes of polymicrobial bacterial septicemia, one episode of fungemia, and 3 episodes of disseminated fungal infection. In the first 25 episodes, G-CSF was not used (group A). For the next 16 episodes, G-CSF 200 μg per square meter per day subcutaneously was given immediately after the septicemia was documented until the absolute neutrophil count was maintained at more than 1,500 per cubic millimeter (group B). Thereafter, G-CSF at the same dose as that of group B was prophylactically used in all the children who received high-dose cytosine arablnc-side-containing regimens. Nine episodes of septicemia occurred (group C). The incidences of mortality per episode of septicemia in groups A, B, and C were 12.0% (3/25), 12.5% (2/16) and 0% (0/9), respectively. Statistically, there was no difference between the three groups overall and in pair-wise comparisons (all P > 0.5). The durations of G-CSF administration in group B ranged from 6 to 26 days with a median of 12 days and the durations of G-CSF administration in group C ranged from 10 to 23 days with a median of 19 days. With or without G-CSF, there may be no significant difference in the mortality of septicemia following neutropenia caused by chemotherapy in children with acute leukemia.     

Glycosylated vs non-glycosylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)--results of a prospective randomised monocentre study

The discovery of the haematopoietic growth factor granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has reduced infection-related morbidity in cancer patients by alleviating post-chemotherapy neutropenia. Two formulations of recombinant human (rh) G-CSF, one glycosylated and one non-glycosylated, are available. The glycosylated form, lenograstim, possesses at least 25% greater bioactivity in vitro. Some comparative studies into the preparation's potential to mobilise haematopoietic stem cells suggest a similar advantage. In the light of the great clinical importance of G-CSF, we have performed the first prospective, randomised, crossover study on children with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. G-CSF (250 microg/m(2)) was started 1 day after the chemotherapy block, and was administered until a WBC >1500/microl was achieved on 3 successive days. Thirty-three G-CSF cycles from 11 patients (16 lenograstim, 17 filgrastim) were studied. They were investigated for duration of very severe (WBC <500/microl, 9 vs 9.5 days, lenograstim vs filgrastim, median) and severe leukopenia (WBC <1000/microl, 11 vs 11 days), infections (CRP >5 mg/dl, 5 vs 5.5 days), infection-related hospital stay (11 vs 9 days) and antibiotic treatment (9 vs 9 days). Statistical evaluation by paired analysis could not detect any difference between treatment groups; the median difference for all end-points was zero. In summary, at least at 250 microg/m(2), in terms of their clinical effect on neutropenia, the two G-CSF preparations appear to have identical activity.     

Circulating granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) levels after allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation: endogenous G-CSF production correlates with myeloid engraftment.

Myeloid engraftment after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is influenced by a number of variables, including cytoreductive chemoradiotherapy, genetic disparity, number of reinfused committed myeloid progenitor cells, healthy microenvironment, and the presence of hematopoietic growth factors. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) stimulates proliferation of myeloid progenitor cells and enhances myeloid engraftment after BMT. We investigated the temporal relationship between endogenous G-CSF production and myeloid engraftment in both children and adults after allogeneic (ALLO) and autologous (AUTO) BMT. Circulating endogenous G-CSF levels ranged between 0 and 2552 pg/mL. The correlation coefficient between circulating serum G-CSF levels and the peripheral absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was r = -.875 (P less than .001). The endogenous serum G-CSF level was highest during the first week after BMT, when the ANC was less than or equal to 200/microL (699 +/- 82.3 pg/mL) (P less than .001). Both children and adults demonstrated a similar inverse relationship between circulating G-CSF level and degree of neutropenia. One patient failed to engraft after AUTO BMT and also failed to generate any endogenous G-CSF production. Lastly, once the serum G-CSF level decreased to less than 200 pg/mL, a mean of 6.1 +/- 0.9 days elapsed before the ANC was greater than or equal to 500/microL for 2 consecutive days. This study demonstrates that endogenous G-CSF production is associated with myeloid engraftment in both children and adults after AUTO and ALLO BMT and that the rate of increase and decrease in endogenous G-CSF may be predictive of either failure to engraft or duration of neutropenia.     

Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy

Two hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors, granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF), have been shown to accelerate leukocyte and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow (BM) support. Despite their use, a prolonged period of absolute leukopenia persists during which infections and other complications of transplantation occur. We collected large numbers of peripheral blood (PB) progenitors after CSF administration using either G-CSF or GM-CSF and tested their ability to affect hematopoietic reconstitution and resource utilization in patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. Patients with breast cancer or melanoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support were studied in sequential nonrandomized trials. After identical high-dose chemotherapy, patients received either BM alone, with no CSF; BM with either G-CSF or GM-CSF; or BM with G-CSF or GM-CSF and G-CSF or GM-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Hematopoietic reconstitution, as well as resource utilization, was monitored in these patients. The use of CSF- primed PBPC led to a highly significant reduction in the duration of leukopenia with a white blood cell (WBC) count under 100 and 200 cells/mL, and neutrophil count under 100 and 200 cells/mL with both GM- and G-CSF primed PB progenitor cells, compared with the use of the CSF with BM or with historical controls using BM alone. In addition, the use of CSF-primed PBPC resulted in a significant reduction in median number of antibiotics used, days in the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, and hospital resources used. Patients receiving G-CSF primed PBPC also experienced a reduction in the median number of days in the hospital, red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, platelet transfusions, days on antibiotics, and discounted hospital charges. Phenotypic analysis of the CSF-primed PBPC indicated the presence of cells bearing antigens associated with both early and late hematopoietic progenitor cells. The use of CSF-primed PBPC can significantly improve hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous BM support. In addition, the use of G-CSF-primed PBPC was associated with a significant reduction in hospital resource utilization, and a reduction in hospital charges.     

A randomized,multicenter study of G-CSF starting on day +1 vs day +5 after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

In order to assess the effect of delaying G-CSF administration after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation on the duration of neutropenia, 87 patients were randomized to receive G-CSF 5 microg/kg/day starting on day +1 (n = 45) or +5 (n = 42) following PBPC transplantation, until recovery of the neutrophils. The duration of neutropenia (<0.5 x 10(9)/l) was shorter in the day +1 group (7 vs 8 days; P = 0.02), especially in patients receiving melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and CD34(+) cell doses >3.0 x 10(6)/kg. These patients had a later onset of neutropenia after transplant. There were no differences in time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, or in the incidence of fever and documentation of infection. Although the duration of antibiotic therapy (7 vs 10.5 days; P = 0.01) and time to hospital discharge (13 vs 15 days; P = 0.02) were shorter in the day +1 group, these differences could not be predicted by the day of G-CSF initiation in multivariate analysis. Starting G-CSF on day +1 does not result in faster neutrophil engraftment but in later onset and consequently, slightly shorter duration of neutropenia in patients who receive melphalan 200 mg/m(2) and CD34(+) cell doses >3.0 x 10(6)/kg.     

Hematopoietic growth factors for graft failure after bone marrow transplantation: a randomized trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus sequential GM-CSF plus granulocyte- CSF

Delay in hematologic recovery after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can extend and amplify the risks of infection and hemorrhage, compromise patients' survival, and increase the duration and cost of hospitalization. Because current studies suggest that granulocyte- macrophage (GM) colony-stimulating factor (CSF) may potentiate the sensitivity of hematopoietic progenitor cells to G-CSF, we performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing GM-CSF (250 micrograms/m2/d x 14 days) versus sequential GM-CSF x 7 days followed by G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/d x 7 days) as treatment for primary or secondary graft failure after BMT. Eligibility criteria included failure to achieve a white blood cell (WBC) count > or = 100/microL by day +21 or > or = 300/microL by day +28, no absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 200/microL by day +28, or secondary sustained neutropenia after initial engraftment. Forty-seven patients were enrolled: 23 received GM-CSF (10 unrelated, 8 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous), and 24 received GM- CSF followed by G-CSF (12 unrelated, 7 related allogeneic, and 5 autologous). For patients receiving GM-CSF alone, neutrophil recovery (ANC > or = 500/microL) occurred between 2 and 61 days (median, 8 days) after therapy, while those receiving GM-CSF+G-CSF recovered at a similar rate of 1 to 36 days (median, 6 days; P = .39). Recovery to red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence was slow, occurring 6 to 250 days (median, 35 days) after enrollment with no significant difference between the two treatment groups (GM-CSF: median, 30 days; GM-CSF+G- CSF; median, 42 days; P = .24). Similarly, platelet transfusion independence was delayed until 4 to 249 days (median, 32 days) after enrollment, with no difference between the two treatment groups (GM- CSF: median, 28 days; GM-CSF+G-CSF: median, 42 days; P = .38). Recovery times were not different between patients with unrelated donors and those with related donors or autologous transplant recipients. Survival at 100 days after enrollment was superior after treatment with GM-CSF alone. Only 1 of 23 patients treated with GM-CSF died versus 7 of 24 treated with GM-CSF+G-CSF who died 16 to 84 days (median, 38 days) after enrollment, yielding Kaplan-Meier 100-day survival estimates of 96% +/- 8% for GM-CSF versus 71% +/- 18% for GM-CSF+G-CSF (P = .026). These data suggest that sequential growth factor therapy with GM-CSF followed by G-CSF offers no advantage over GM-CSF alone in accelerating trilineage hematopoiesis or preventing lethal complications in patients with poor graft function after BMT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Neutropenic infections in 100 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's disease treated with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant: out-patient treatment is a viable option

A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL, n = 75) or Hodgkin's disease (HD, n = 25) who underwent peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant (PBPCT) following high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan (BEAM) between March 1994 and June 1997. Following PBPCT and until engraftment all patients received oral ciprofloxacin and fluconazole, patients with positive Herpes simplex virus serology received acyclovir and 91 patients received filgrastim. The median days of neutropenia and days to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/mm3 were 6 and 9, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 68 patients. Gram-positive bacteremia occurred in 14 patients. No gram-negative infections, invasive fungal infections, intensive care visits or deaths occurred during the period of neutropenia or in the first 30 days following transplant. In multivariate logistic regression the risk of development of any infection was associated only with the duration of neutropenia (P = 0.02) and the risk of bacteremia was associated only with the number of CD34+ cells infused (P = 0.046). Among 49 patients treated in the outpatient setting, 14 (28%) were never admitted. High-dose chemotherapy with BEAM supported by PBPCT, prophylactic antibiotics and filgrastim resulted in a low incidence of infections and no acute mortality. WBC engraftment occurred rapidly allowing for a predictable course during which lengthy hospital stays and amphotericin therapy could be avoided.     

Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation followed by G-CSF

Infectious complications after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) have been reported in a few studies including small patient numbers. The present study was performed to assess the incidence, types, outcome and factors affecting early and late infections in 150 patients aged 18 to 68 years (median 46.5) who underwent high-dose therapy, with G-CSF. Patients were kept in reverse isolation rooms and received antimicrobial chemoprophylaxis with oral quinolone and fluconazole. One hundred and fifteen patients (76.7%) developed fever (median 3 days, range 1-29); 20 patients (55.5%) had Gram-positive and 13 (36. 2%) Gram-negative bacterial infections. There were no fungal infections or infection-related deaths. Mucositis grade II-IV (P = 0. 0001; odds ratio 3.4) and >5 days on ANC <100/microl (P = 0.0001; odds ratio 2.3) correlated with development of infection. Only days with ANC <100/microl affected infection outcome (P = 0.0024) whereas the antibiotic regimen did not. After day +30 there were four cases of bacterial pneumonitis (2.7%), one case of fatal CMV pneumonia (0. 8%) and 20 of localized VZV infection (13.3%). Reduction of neutropenia duration with PBPCT and G-CSF is not enough to prevent early infectious complications since only a few days of severe neutropenia and mucositis are related to development of early infections. However, no infection-related deaths were seen. Although Gram-positive organisms were the major cause of bacteremia, a glycopeptide in the empirical antibiotic regimen did not affect infection outcome. In PBPCT recipients, early and late opportunistic infections were notably absent, which was at variance with what was seen with bone marrow recipients. Efforts should be made to prevent mucositis and neutropenia and identify new strategies of antibacterial prophylaxis.     

Analysis of serum lactate dehydrogenase and its isozymes during administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity is known to become elevated following granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy in some patients, but no extensive studies on this phenomenon have been performed. In 26 children with malignancies in complete remission who received recombinant human G-CSF intravenously after combined chemotherapy, we measured serum LDH and its isozymes (81 episodes) before chemotherapy (pre-Tx), during administration of G-CSF (mid-Tx), and after stopping G-CSF (post-Tx) and compared the obtained data using paired t test. Twelve episodes were excluded from analysis because of liver dysfunction (alanine aminotransferase > 45 IU/L). Serum LDH at mid-Tx (343.1+/-19.8 IU/L; mean +/- SE) was significantly higher than that at pre-Tx (186.9+/-6.7 IU/L) and post-Tx, but this difference was observed only when change in white blood cell counts (WBCs) (WBC at mid-Tx minus WBC at pre-Tx) was greater than or equal to 4000/microL (58 episodes). Percentages of LDH isozymes 3, 4, and 5 at mid-Tx (23.5+/-1.0, 11.7+/-0.8, and 8.3+/-0.7) were significantly increased compared with those at pre-Tx (19.5+/-0.7, 6.3+/-0.3, and 4.2+/-0.5) and post-Tx, resulting in a significant decrease in percentages of LDH isozymes 1 and 2 at mid-Tx. In episodes of change in WBCs > or =4000/microL, change in LDH significantly correlated to changes in WBCs and granulocytes but not to change in lymphocytes or monocytes. These results suggest that serum LDH is significantly elevated during G-CSF administration in accordance with the increase in peripheral granulocytes, which accompanies change in the pattern of percentages of LDH isozymes.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor shortens duration of critical neutropenia and prolongs disease-free survival after sequential high-dose cytosine arabinoside and mitoxantrone (S-HAM) salvage therapy for refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia

 Patients with primary refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who undergo intensive salvage chemotherapy carry a high risk of treatment failure due to infectious complications and early relapses. The study presented here assessed the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the duration of post-treatment neutropenia, the incidence of infection-related deaths, and the disease-free and overall survival. Sixty-eight evaluable patients with relapsed and refractory AML received G-CSF 5 μg/kg per day subcutaneously starting 2 days after the completion of salvage treatment with the S-HAM regimen, consisting of high-dose cytosine arabinoside twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 and mitoxantrone on days 3, 4, 10, and 11. Ninety-one patients who were treated with the identical S-HAM regimen but without G-CSF support during a preceding study served as controls. The application of G-CSF resulted in a significant shortening of critical neutropenia of less than 500 μl (36 vs. 40 days;p=0.008), which translated into a trend towards a lower early death rate (21% vs. 30%) and an increase of complete remissions (56% vs. 47%, p=0.11). In patients younger than 60 years a significant prolongation of time to treatment failure (159 vs. 93 days, p=0.038) and of duration of disease-free survival (203 vs. 97 days, p=0.003) was observed. These results indicate a beneficial effect of G-CSF on early mortality as well as on long-term outcome when administered after S-HAM salvage therapy for advanced AML.     

Growth factors and hemostasis: differential effects of GM-CSF and G-CSF on coagulation activation – laboratory and clinical evidence

Granulocyte-macrophage (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) are equally effective hematopoietic growth factors in terms of their potential to shorten the period of neutropenia following high-dose chemotherapy or to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells. Thus the choice between the two preparations must be based on a comparison of adverse effects. Both GM-CSF and G-CSF have been implicated in disturbances of the hemostatic system, resulting in both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. We therefore studied the effects of GM-CSF and G-CSF therapy on hemostasis both ex vivo and clinically. In a prospective, non-randomized study 34 patients who were treated with a myeloablative regimen according to the hyper-ME+/-C protocol and stem cell or bone marrow transplantation received posttransplantation hematopoietic support with GM-CSF (n=15) or G-CSF (n=19). The patients were monitored for alterations in plasmatic coagulation parameters and clinical evidence of hemorrhagic or thrombotic events. GM-CSF, but not G-CSF, induced a significant, albeit usually mild activation of the coagulation cascade. We observed an increased frequency of veno-occlusive disease in the GM-CSF group (3/15 vs. 1/19 on G-CSF, n.s.). Other thrombotic events were rare. At the same time, hemorrhage was both more common and more severe in GM-CSF treated patients than in those on G-CSF (macroscopic hemorrhage 11/15 vs. 10/19, III hemorrhage 7/15 vs. 1/19 on GM-CSF or G-CSF, respectively). In conclusion, unlike G-CSF, if given after hyper-ME chemotherapy plus stem cell or bone marrow transplantation, at the dosage used here GM-CSF induced an activation of the coagulation system and was associated with an increased risk of hemostasis associated treatment complications.     

Transient atypical monocytosis mimic acute myelomonocytic leukemia in post-chemotherapy patients receiving G-CSF: report of two cases

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is now widely used in patients with malignant disorders receiving intensive chemotherapy to increase leukocyte count and to upregulate phagocyte function during neutropenia. Monocytosis associated with G-CSF has been reported in anecdotal literature. We report two cases of pseudoleukemia secondary to G-CSF administration. Both patients initially presented with myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 7 abnormalities that evolved into acute myeloid leukemia. Case one had deletion 7q while case two initially had monosomy 7 and subsequently developed a balanced translocation between the short (p) arm of chromosome 1 and long (q) arm of chromosome 15. Following the induction chemotherapy and G-CSF administration, both of these patients developed pseudoleukemia. Patient 1 had white blood cell (WBC) count of 26 x 10(9)/l with 72% monocytes, while patient two had WBC of 14.1 x 10(9)/l with 30% monocytes. In both patients the monocytosis resolved after the discontinuation of G-CSF therapy. In summary, patients treated with G-CSF should be followed closely. In those cases with pseudoleukemia discontinuation of the drug with no supplemental chemotherapy is probably enough to control the atypical monocytosis.     

Pegfilgrastim use during chemotherapy: current and future applications

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression is the most common dose-limiting side effect of cancer chemotherapy. Neutropenia is a serious risk with chemotherapy, associated with infectious complications, use of intravenous antibiotics, hospitalization, and even death. The occurrence of febrile neutropenia can lead to dose reductions and delay in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy that may have a detrimental affect on overall survival and disease-free survival. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) can reduce the duration of severe neutropenia, the incidence of febrile neutropenia, and allow planned dosing and timing of chemotherapy. Filgrastim is a G-CSF that has demonstrated benefit for the treatment and prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN), but its short half-life requires repeated daily subcutaneous injection. Pegfilgrastim is a recombinant G-CSF created by attaching a polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecule to the filgrastim protein. Once-per-cycle dosing of pegfilgrastim has been evaluated in clinical trials using myelosuppressive chemotherapy in breast cancer, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Trials have demonstrated that pegfilgrastim is comparable in safety and efficacy to filgrastim for decreasing the duration of severe neutropenia after chemotherapy in patients with nonmyeloid malignancy. This review will summarize recent clinical trial results and novel uses of pegfilgrastim.     

Prospective randomized trial to evaluate two delayed granulocyte colony stimulating factor administration schedules after high-dose cytarabine therapy in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during remission induction shortens granulocytopenia and may decrease morbidity due to infections. However, the optimal timing of G-CSF administration after chemotherapy is not known. In a prospective randomized multi-center study, adult ALL patients were treated with high-dose ARA-C [HDAC, 3 g/m(2) bid (1 g/m(2) bid for T-ALL) days 1-4] and mitoxantrone (MI 10 mg/m(2) days 3-5). They were randomized to receive recombinant human G-CSF (Lenograstim) 263 micro g/day SC starting either from day 12 (Group 1) or day 17 (Group 2). Fifty-five patients (41 male, 14 female) with a median age of 34 years (range: 18-55 years) were enrolled into the study; 50 patients were evaluable. The median duration of neutropenia <500/ micro l after HDAC/MI was 12 days (range: 7-22 days) in the early G-CSF Group 1 and also 12 days (range: 4-22 days) in the late G-CSF Group 2; this was shorter than in the historical control group (15 days, range: 4-43 days, n=46) where the patients received identical cytotoxic treatment without G-CSF. Seventeen infections were observed in 14 patients in Group 1 (47%) and 13 infections in 10 patients in Group 2 (50%) compared to 27 infections in 49 patients of the historical control (54%). In Group 1, the patients received a median of 11 injections with G-CSF (range: 7-22) compared to 7 injections (range: 4-19) in Group 2. The total administered dose of G-CSF in Group 2 was significantly reduced by 40% ( P<0.0001). The delayed start of G-CSF after HDAC/MI in ALL achieves the same clinical benefit compared to the earlier initiation of G-CSF. The reduction of treatment costs by reducing the total G-CSF dose may be important in future treatment with this hematopoietic growth factor.     

Pharmacologic rationale for early G-CSF prophylaxis in cancer patients and role of pharmacogenetics in treatment optimization

The use of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) has become an integral part of supportive care during cytotoxic chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend the use of G-CSF in patients with substantial risk of febrile neutropenia. However, little consensus exists about optimal timing and tailoring of this therapy. Based on the known effects of chemotherapy and G-CSF on bone marrow compartments, we propose a model that supports the prophylactic rather than therapeutic use of G-CSF therapy. In addition, several genetic alterations in G-CSF signalling pathway have been described. These genetic variants may predict the risk of febrile neutropenia and response to G-CSF. Thus, future pharmacogenetic/omics studies in this field are warranted. Through the identification of patients at risk and the knowledge of biological basis for optimal timing, hopefully we should soon be able to improve the application of the existing guidelines for G-CSF therapy and patient's prognosis.     

重组人粒细胞—集落刺激因子预防肺癌化部期感染的效果

目的 总结重组人粒细胞－集落刺激因子（ｒｈＧ－ＣＳＦ）预防肺癌化疗期感染的效果。方法 回顾分析１６３例（３０８例次）肺癌患化疗期辅用或不同ｒｈＧ－ＣＳＦ中性粒细胞恢复和感染情况。结果 化疗期用ｒｈＧ－ＣＳＦ患（Ｇ－ＣＳＦ组）感染率（５４／２１７，２５％）明显低于非Ｇ－ＣＳＦ期（５１／９１，５６％）（Ｐ〈０．００５）；Ｇ－ＣＳＦ组化疗期中性粒细胞减少的发生率明显低于非Ｇ－ＣＳＦ组（Ｐ〈０．００５     

High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for resistant multiple myeloma

Seven patients with advanced multiple myeloma, refractory to therapy with alkylating agent-VAD (vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone), received a regimen combining high-dose melphalan with total body irradiation supported by autologous bone marrow transplantation. Very rapid, usually greater than 90% tumor mass reduction was achieved in six patients, regardless of prior chemotherapy responsiveness and marrow plasmacytosis up to 30%. Despite signs of early relapse in three patients (median remission duration of all patients, 15 months), five remain alive and well without further cytotoxic therapy from 2 to 21 months (median, 9+ months). Two patients died, one from surgical complications after transplantation and a second due to persistent neutropenia with fatal pneumonia. This treatment provides meaningful disease control for selected patients with resistant myeloma and a poor prognosis.