共查询到16条相似文献,搜索用时 94 毫秒
1.
目的:比较直肠癌新辅助放化疗后达到临床完全缓解(clinical complete response,cCR)采取等待观察策略和手术切除治疗策略在肿瘤控制及生存期方面的差异,以此阐述等待观察策略的可行性。方法:在国外数据库中检索关于直肠癌新辅助放化疗(nCRT)达到cCR关于等待观察策略和手术切除对比试验的相关文献,按照纳入和排除标准进行文献筛选和质量评估,使用STATA 12.0软件进行Meta分析,对比两组在局部复发、远处转移、肿瘤相关死亡、2年及5年无疾病进展生存期和总体生存期之间的差异。结果:本研究总共纳入9篇文献,Meta分析结果显示:等待观察组相比手术组有着较高的局部复发率(LR)(RR=5.05;95%CI:2.22~11.51;P<0.001),但是两组在远处转移(RR=0.93;95%CI:0.51~1.68;P=0.805)、肿瘤相关死亡(RR=0.83;95%CI:0.37~1.87;P=0.658)、2年无疾病进展生存期(RR=0.97;95%CI:0.91~1.03;P=0.277)、2年总体生存期(RR=1.03;95%CI:0.97~1.10;P=0.346)、5年无疾病进展生存期(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.83~1.08;P=0.406)、5年总体生存期(RR=1.03;95%CI:0.95~1.11;P=0.534)并无统计学差异。结论:对于部分nCRT后达到cCR的患者采用等待观察策略是可行的,但需要制定严格的筛选标准以及规范的随访。 相似文献
2.
新辅助治疗已成为局部晚期直肠癌的标准治疗模式。新辅助治疗后对肿瘤反应进行评估及再分期对于制定患者后续的治疗策略和预测肿瘤的预后至关重要。有一部分患者在新辅助治疗后能达到临床完全缓解甚至病理完全缓解,而在病理未明确之前如何评估临床缓解一直是目前国内外专家关注的焦点。本文就直肠癌新辅助治疗后的最佳评估时间和评估方法的进展进行综述。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
新辅助治疗是局部进展期直肠癌综合治疗的重要手段,其能使根治性手术成功率提高,使无法切除的肿瘤缩小并可切除,提高保肛率,也使部分患者获得临床完全缓解。针对新辅助治疗后临床完全缓解的患者目前有3种治疗措施,包括根治性切除、局部切除及非手术治疗。论文对3种治疗措施的实施及其预后做一综述。 相似文献
6.
7.
新辅助放化疗联合全直肠系膜切除术为分期T
3-T
4期或N+的局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗,但往往会带来一系列术后并发症,尤其是接受腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术(Mile′s术)不能保留肛门者,严重影响生活质量。对于新辅助治疗后肿瘤(近)临床完全缓解者,器官保留策略在与根治性手术达到相似治疗疗效... 相似文献
8.
目的 通过比较新辅助放化疗后cCR的直肠癌患者采用非手术治疗和TME治疗的效果,旨在探讨非手术治疗策略的可行性。方法 选取2006—2016年中山大学肿瘤防治中心接受术前放化疗并获得cCR的135例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期直肠癌患者,根据治疗方法的不同将其分为非手术组(43例NOM组)和标准手术组(92例SOM组)。比较2组患者的局部复发率、挽救性治疗后的累计LC率、DFS、OS以及保肛率等。Kaplan-Meier法计算LC、OS、DFS并Logrank法检验,χ2检验保肛率。结果 中位随访39个月(10~127个月)。135例患者的局部复发率及远处转移率分别为3.7%和11.1%,术后3年DFS和OS分别为90.5%和97.0%。NOM组与SOM组术后3、5年DFS率分别为87%与93%、73%与87%(P=0.089),OS率分别为98%与99%、98%与97%(P=0.578)。NOM组局部复发5例(12%),80%患者得到挽救性治疗,累计LC率为98%;SOM组无局部复发病例;两组差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。NOM组保肛率为93%,显著高于SOM组的70%(P=0.030)。结论 新辅助放化疗后获得cCR的直肠癌患者采取非手术治疗策略是可行的,部分局部复发患者仍可通过及时的挽救性治疗痊愈,从而有效避免了TME及其并发症,提高了患者的生活质量。 相似文献
9.
目的 评估影响直肠癌新辅助放化疗后pCR的临床因素。方法 回顾分析2009—2012年间接受新辅助放化疗随后行根治性手术的116例直肠癌患者临床资料。所有患者术前接受盆腔调强放疗50 Gy分25次,同期氟尿嘧啶为基础化疗,完成治疗休息4~8周后行根治性手术。应用 Logistic法分析影响pCR和非pCR的临床因素。结果 共20例患者经新辅助放化疗后达pCR,pCR率为17.2%。单因素分析表明肿瘤侵犯直肠管腔周径范围达75%以上(全周肿瘤)、治疗前血清CEA水平、T分期、N分期、肛缘距离、分化程度、肿瘤最大直径与直肠癌新辅助放化疗后肿瘤pCR水平相关。多因素分析结果显示全周肿瘤、治疗前血清CEA水平和T分期是影响放化疗后肿瘤pCR预测因素。结论 非全周肿瘤、低CEA水平和早T分期等治疗前临床因素可能是获得pCR的重要决定因素。 相似文献
10.
目的 探讨局部晚期直肠癌患者接受新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后达病理完全缓解(pCR)的关联因素.方法 回顾性分析2017-06-01—2019-04-10福建医科大学附属协和医院305例确诊为局部晚期直肠癌患者临床资料,所有患者均接受nCRT及根治性手术,80例术后达pCR为病例组,225例未达pCR为对照组.采用病例对... 相似文献
11.
Jun Li Hao Liu Jie Yin Sai Liu Junjie Hu Feng Du Jiatian Yuan Bo Lv Jun Fan Shusheng Leng Xin Zhang 《Oncotarget》2015,6(39):42354-42361
A wait-and-see policy might be considered instead of surgery for rectal cancer patients with no residual tumor or involved lymph nodes on imaging or endoscopy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (clinical complete response, cCR). In this cohort study, we compared the oncologic outcomes of rectal cancer patients with a cCR who were managed according to a wait-and-see policy (observation group) or with surgery (surgery group). In the observation group, follow-up was performed every 3 months for the first year and consisted of MRI, endoscopy with biopsy, computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography. In the surgery group, patients received radical surgery. Long-term oncologic outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Thirty patients were enrolled in the observation group (median follow-up, 60 months; range, 18-100 months), and 92 patients were enrolled in the surgery group (median follow-up, 58 months; range, 18-109 months). The 5-year disease free survival and overall survival rates were similar in the two groups: 90.0% vs. 94.3% (P = 0.932) and 100.0% vs. 95.6% (P = 0.912), respectively. We conclude that for rectal cancer patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, a wait-and-see policy with strict selection criteria, follow-up and salvage treatments achieves outcomes at least as good as radical surgery. Additionally, we declare that the pCR (pathologic complete regression) and non-pCR subgroups of patients with a cCR have similar long-term failure (local recurrence and/or distant metastasis) rate. 相似文献
12.
13.
Intensified concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer 总被引:16,自引:0,他引:16
Klautke G Feyerherd P Ludwig K Prall F Foitzik T Fietkau R 《British journal of cancer》2005,92(7):1215-1220
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy intensified with irinotecan in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Eligible patients had nonmetastatic disease at a locally advanced stage that made R0 resection and sphincter preservation uncertain. They received preoperative radiation over 6 weeks to 45 Gy and boost of 5.4 Gy and concurrent continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) and weekly irinotecan 40 mg m(-2). In all, 37 patients entered the study. T stage at baseline as determined by ultrasound was T2/T3/T4 in 2/19/16 patients; 31 patients had lymph node involvement. The predominant toxicity was diarrhoea (grade 3/4 in 10/2 patients). Haematologic toxicity and surgical complications were moderate. Among 36 patients undergoing surgery, 32 (89%) had R0 resection and 23 (64%) sphincter preservation. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was achieved in eight (22%) of 36 patients, and 10 patients (28%) had only microscopic residual disease. At 4 years, overall survival was 66%, disease-free survival 73%, local relapse rate 7%, and distant failure rate 24%. Extent of resection and postoperative nodal status were significant predictors of overall and disease-free survival. Intensified neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan can be safely administered and results in a high pCR rate. 相似文献
14.
Prognostic significance of neoadjuvant rectal score in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and construction of a prediction model 下载免费PDF全文
Yanwu Sun MD Yiyi Zhang MD Xuejing Wu MD Huiming Lin MD Xingrong Lu PhD Ying Huang PhD Zongbin Xu PhD Shenghui Huang MD Xiaojie Wang MD Pan Chi MD 《Journal of surgical oncology》2018,117(4):737-744
15.
16.
目的:探索局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)经新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解(pCR)和肿瘤降期(ypT0-1)的预测因素。方法:回顾性分析71例经新辅助化疗后进行全直肠系膜切除术的局部进展期直肠癌患者的临床资料,分析其临床特征,筛选经新辅助化疗后达到pCR及肿瘤降期(ypT0-1)的预测因子。结果:单因素分析结果显示肿瘤占肠腔<1/2周(P<0.001)、基线CEA≤5 ng/mL(P=0.001)、基线临床N分期为N0期(P=0.019)以及新辅助治疗2周期后影像评估为缓解(P=0.002)与直肠癌新辅助化疗后的高pCR率有关;肿瘤占肠腔<1/2周(P<0.001)、基线CEA≤5 ng/mL(P=0.029)以及新辅助治疗2周期后影像评估为缓解(P=0.007)与直肠癌新辅助化疗后的高肿瘤降期率(ypT0-1)有关。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,肿瘤占肠腔环周大小(P=0.013)、基线CEA水平(P=0.042)以及基线临床N分期(P=0.038)是影响直肠癌新辅助化疗后pCR的独立预测因子;肿瘤占肠腔环周大小(P=0.001)是影响直肠癌新辅助化疗后肿瘤降期(ypT0-1)的独立预测因子。结论:初始诊断时肿瘤占肠腔环周大小、基线CEA水平及淋巴结是否阳性对局部进展期直肠癌新辅助化疗后pCR有预测作用,肿瘤占肠腔环周大小对局部进展期直肠癌新辅助化疗后肿瘤降期(ypT0-1)有预测作用。 相似文献