Greater length of hospital stay for concurrent hip and upper limb fractures compared to isolated hip fractures: a systematic review of 13 studies including 210,289 patients and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe impact of concurrent upper limb and fragility hip fractures has not been well defined. A greater understanding of this can guide decision making in the early peri-operative period and subsequent rehabilitation of such patients.AimsTo identify if patients with concurrent upper limb and fragility hip fractures have different outcomes and demographics than those with an isolated hip fracture.MethodsA search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed to identify cohort and case-control studies, comparing concurrent hip and upper limb fractures with isolated hip fractures. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Subgroup analyses were performed for concurrent distal radius and concurrent proximal humerus fractures.Results13 studies were included reporting on 196,916 patients with an isolated hip fracture and 13,373 with concurrent hip and upper limb fractures. Patients with concurrent upper limb fractures had a significantly longer length of hospital stay (mean difference: 3.97 days, 95% CI: 1.36, 6.57, P=0.003) as compared to those with isolated hip fractures. Patients with concurrent upper limb fractures were significantly more likely to be female (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.70, P<0.00001), reside at home pre-injury (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.96, P=0.03) and have no cognitive impairment (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35, 0.84, P=0.006). Patients with concurrent distal radius fractures had significantly lower 90-day mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.99, P=0.04) and 1-year mortality (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.90, P=0.008).ConclusionsConcurrent fragility hip and upper limb fractures are associated with increased length of hospital stay. We recommend early, aggressive, individualised rehabilitation to help improve outcomes and early hospital discharge in this highly vulnerable patient group.     

BMD and Bone Geometry in Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputees

Prolonged unloading of bone(s) in the residual limb after amputation may cause significant bone loss in the hip and distal bony end of the residual limb. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of amputation on bone geometry, volumetric BMD (vBMD), and areal BMD (aBMD) by comparing the intact and residual limbs in unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputees. Amputees (seven above‐knee; seven below‐knee) and two groups of nonamputee control subjects gave informed consent to participate in this study. aBMD of the dual proximal femur, lumbar spine, and total body was assessed using DXA. Bone geometry and vBMD were assessed at the distal ends of the residual limb and intact limb and at a comparable cross‐sectional slice of the intact limb using pQCT (Stratec XCT 3000). There were no significant group differences in age, height, weight, physical activity, time as an amputee, hours wearing a prosthesis per day, or total body and lumbar spine BMD and BMC. There were significant side × group interactions for total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter BMD, with the amputated side having lower BMD, and differences being most severe in above‐knee amputees. Total and cortical vBMD and area were significantly lower at the end of the residual limb compared with the similar slice of the intact limb for both above‐ and below‐knee amputees. In conclusion, amputees exhibited large decrements in BMD, both at the hip and at the end of the residual limb, compared with the intact side. These lower BMD values put amputees, particularly the above‐knee amputees, at increased risk for osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the hip.     

Bilateral femur fractures are associated with concomitant femoral neck fracture

Objective

The purpose of this study is to determine the rate of femoral neck fractures in patients who have sustained bilateral femur fractures compared to unilateral femur fractures.

Design and setting

A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical center.

Patients

All patients treated for a femur fracture between May 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included.

Results

Twenty-one patients sustained bilateral femur fractures (11%) and 166 sustained unilateral femur fractures. Fifteen associated ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were identified. Eight of the 15 (53%) associated femoral neck fractures were observed in patients who sustained bilateral femur fractures. Eight of the 21 patients with bilateral femur fractures, 42 fractures in total, had an associated ipsilateral femoral neck fracture (38% of patients; 19% of fractures, respectively), while only seven of the 166 patients (4%) with a unilateral femur fracture had an associated femoral neck fracture (p < 0.001). Of the 208 femur fractures, 19 (9%) were open fractures. Ten of the 21 patients with bilateral femur fractures, 42 fractures in total, were identified to have an open femur fracture (48% of patients, 24% of fractures), while only nine of the 166 (5%) unilateral femur fractures were open (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate an association between bilateral femur fractures, open femur fractures, and associated femoral neck fractures. Surgeons treating these injuries should maintain a high index of suspicion for associated ipsilateral proximal.

     

Intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur in a bilateral above-knee amputee: A case report with technical tips for intraoperative positioning and literature review

Intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur are one of the most common fractures of the lower limbs. Most cases require osteosynthesis with suitable implants, and intraoperative positioning of the patient on the fracture table is a prerequisite to facilitate fracture manipulation, traction, reduction and fluoroscopy assessment. However, positioning the limbs of bilateral above-knee amputees for internal fixation of related proximal femoral fractures is a difficult task, which requires customized inventory for effective limb positioning and fracture manipulation. This study reported a rare case following a crush injury of bilateral lower limb in a road traffic accident, and described some technical tips of acute femoral neck fractures in bilateral above-knee amputation. The patient was managed with immediate guillotine amputation and later secondary wound closure followed by internal fixation of the right-sided femoral neck fracture with multiple cancellous cannulated screws.     

Does anatomical type of proximal hip fracture affect rehabilitation outcomes among older adults?

Background and purposeNumerous studies have detailed the potential benefits of inpatient geriatric rehabilitation for older adults with hip fractures. However, data regarding effect of fracture type (femoral neck, intertrochanteric, or subtrochanteric) on rehabilitation outcomes are limited. This study assessed whether the anatomical type of proximal hip fracture affects rehabilitation outcomes among disabled older adults.MethodsA population-based study was conducted comparing all patients with a recent hip fracture who were admitted to a geriatric rehabilitation facility in Israel. Data were collected retrospectively from an electronic database during a 5-year period (2014–2019). The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was used to assess physical and cognitive function at admission and discharge.ResultsThe analyses included 624 older adults with hip fractures. We found significant differences in motor FIM score at admission, as patients with femoral neck fracture performed better than patients with intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture did. The disparity in motor FIM score remained consistent through discharge, with all groups achieving a median gain of 14 points. Within one month of rehabilitation, about a third of all patients achieved a higher functional level.ConclusionsPatients with femoral neck fracture have better motor ability than do those with intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, which were retained throughout the course of rehabilitation; yet, the level of improvement remained similar. Clinicians should be aware of such differences in functional ability when discussing goals of care with older adults with hip fractures and consider them when implementing individual rehabilitation programs .     

Stump fractures in lower extremity amputees

A series of 23 above-knee and below-knee amputees who sustained an ipsilateral lower extremity fracture was qualitatively evaluated with respect to the nature of the injuries sustained, associated problems, and results of fracture treatment. The overall incidence of these fractures was 3% in a population of lower-extremity amputees. The stump fractures encountered were distal femur fractures and fractures about the hip. More than one fourth of these fractures had an initially missed or 'delayed' diagnosis. Most femur fractures were successfully treated by nonoperative means, and most of the hip fractures were treated operatively. The final rehabilitated status of the dysvascular amputees was the poorest: one half of those who were previous household ambulators remained wheelchair confined postinjury.     

Elderly patients with two episodes of fragility hip fractures form a special subgroup

PURPOSE. To identify the demographic features of patients aged 65 years or older admitted with 2 episodes of fragility hip fractures. METHODS. From July 2003 to December 2004 inclusive, 50 consecutive elderly patients underwent surgery for a second episode of hip fracture. Patients in a very poor physical condition and therefore unfit for surgery were excluded. Risk factors of fractures in both episodes and whether risk factors were corrected after the first episode were analysed. Detailed radiological assessment and charting of elderly mobility scores and Barthel index were completed and the one-year mortality rate documented. The rehabilitation periods for the 2 episodes of hip fracture were compared. RESULTS. Most patients were female and had trochanteric fractures. In patients aged 65 to 75 years, the incidence of femoral neck fracture occurred as often as trochanteric fracture; while trochanteric fracture was predominant in older patients. Subclinical osteomalacia and undiagnosed hyperthyroidism was found in 3 of the 7 younger patients. Only 30% of them were on treatment for osteoporosis after the first fracture, which underlines the importance of osteoporosis treatment in these patients. CONCLUSION. Elderly patients with 2 episodes of fragility hip fractures form a special subgroup among geriatric hip fracture patients. Fall prevention programmes and treatment for osteoporosis are recommended.     

Amputations: no longer the end of the road.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effect of an intensive in-patient rehabilitation programme upon the mobility of amputees. METHODS: All major lower limb amputations between 1997 and 1999 received a pre-operative mobility assessment and, where appropriate, were referred for a vigorous rehabilitation programme. RESULTS: 92 lower limb amputations were performed in 87 patients (57 below knee, 33 above knee, two hip disarticulations). Overall, 63% of patients were able to ambulate independently following rehabilitation. Univariate analysis revealed that the only predictor of mobility was the level of amputation, below knee gaining better mobility than above knee (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Lower limb amputees should participate in an aggressive in-patient physiotherapy regimen since reasonable mobility can be achieved in the majority of patients.     

Functional outcome and health related quality of life after dual mobility cup total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in middle aged Egyptian patients

AimThis study was done to assess the functional and clinical results after one year of cemented THR with dual mobility cup for the treatment of fracture neck femur in active middle-aged patients in Egypt (Middle Eastern population).Patients and methodsThis study included 31 patients (32 hips) with displaced femoral neck fractures that were admitted to El Hadara University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt. Their mean age was 66.4 ± 5.9 years. Fifteen patients were females. All the patients were treated with total hip replacement using a cemented dual mobility cup (Ecofit^® 2 M, Implantcast GmbH, Germany) total hip replacement through the standard posterior approach. Functional assessment was done using Harris Hip Score (HHS), SF-36 questionnaire for health related quality of life (HRQoL) with assistance of a physiotherapist.ResultsThe mean HHS improved over the follow up period from 79.04 ± 7.9 at 12 weeks to an average of 92.8 ± 11.1 at 1 year follow up. HRQoL measures showed a pattern of initial drop at 3 months postoperatively, then a steady rise to be restored at 1 year as compared to the preoperative baseline measures. There were no dislocations encountered in this series over one year follow up. The following complications were encountered; 1 deep infection, 2 deep vein thrombosis, 2 heterotopic ossifications, and 1 patient died within one year after surgery.ConclusionsDual mobility cup total hip replacement is an acceptable method for treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in active middle aged patients in Egypt as it provides pain relief and good function without compromising the stability.     

Simultaneous hip and upper limb fracture in the elderly: incidence, features and management considerations

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to a single unit over 4 years with fractured neck of femur. Of the 760 patients admitted over this period of time 36 (4.7%) were found to also have a fracture of the upper limb. The associated upper limb fractures were distal radius (n=28), olecranon (n=2) and neck of humerus (n=5) and fifth metacarpal (n=1), with the same ratio of intracapsular to extracapsular fractures as the whole group. The female to male ratio in the isolated hip fracture group was 2.4:1 and for the combined fractures group was 8:1 (difference P=0.014). The mean patient age was 77.3 years for isolated hip fractures and 83.9 for the combined group (P=0.037). The mean total length of stay in hospital for isolated hip fracture was 15.6 days and for combined fractures was 20.4 days (P=0.010). We have demonstrated that combined upper limb and neck of femur fractures occur in a population that is older and predominantly female. They are associated with a significant increase in hospital stay and increased difficulties in mobilisation as a consequence of the combined fractures. It is therefore important to recognise this specific subgroup of patients presenting with hip fractures in order to ensure that they receive adequate treatment and rehabilitation and that the use of valuable health care resources are optimised.     

High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures of hip: A pilot study

BackgroundVitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a major cause of poor bone health that could lead to fragility fractures, however, there is paucity of literature on prevalence of VDD and associated bone mass in patients of fragility fractures. Hip and spine are the commonest region affected by these fractures and the present study was conceptualised to ascertain the prevalence of VDD and bone mass in patients of hip fragility fractures (proximal femur) to evaluate their role in incidence of these fractures.Methods and materialsBetween January 2013 and December 2013, 66 patients of fragility fractures around hip with age more than 50 years presented to our out patient department. Baseline evaluation of calcium profile, renal function tests, parathyroid hormone and 25(OH)D were done. All patients underwent DXA scan of the non -fractured hip.ResultsTotal number of male patients was 29 and females was 37, with mean age of 64.1 and 70.3 years, respectively. Intertrochanteric femur fractures were the most common type with 35 cases. Fall in bathroom was the most common mode of injury with 36 cases (54.5%). VDD was found in 74.2% of all patients. Prevalence of secondary hyperparathyroidism was observed in 27 patients. Osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis were observed in 15.2%, 62.1% and 18.2% of patients respectively. Sun light exposure was inadequate in 59% of patients with only 1 female patient having adequate exposure.ConclusionPrevalence of Vitamin D deficiency is very high in patients with hip fragility (proximal femur) fractures with secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteoporosis commonly associated. These fractures in our part of the world, occur at a younger age group as compared to the Western population. Majority of the patients sustain in-house fractures.     

Dilemma for Fracture Fixation of Paediatric Ipsilateral Neck with Shaft Femur Fracture

BackgroundIpsilateral femoral neck with shaft fracture (IFNSF) in the paediatric population is a rare injury. This high-impact trauma is often associated with other orthopaedic and systemic injuries. Prognosis is usually guarded as both these osseous injuries are serious and exist together. We report two such patients of IFNSF.MethodsTwo children with IFNSF were admitted at our hospital in 2018. The first patient had an associated head injury, while in the second patient, the shaft femur fracture was open. We report on the treatment and results in these two patients. Both the patients were serially assessed and followed 2 years after the injury.ResultsUnion was achieved in neck and shaft femur fractures in both the patients by 3 months. Complications like avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head, coxa vara, non-union or malunion of fractures, limb length discrepancy, knee and hip stiffness were not seen in either of the patients.ConclusionIFNSF is a rare injury pattern seen in children, usually associated with concomitant orthopedic and other systemic injuries. Early operative stabilization is the preferred modality of treatment. For an undisplaced neck fracture, a provisional temporary fixation of a relatively less displaced neck fracture, definitively stabilizing the shaft fracture, and thereby returning to fix neck fracture is advocated. For displaced neck fractures, a direct open reduction is advocated. Anatomical fixation with separate implants and a relatively longer immobilization can provide the best-expected results. Long-term follow-up is needed to foresee any complications.Level of EvidenceV (case series). Therapeutic.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-020-00315-z.     

Prevalence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Between Two Different Femoral Component Designs Used in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femur fractures are a well-documented complication following direct anterior uncemented total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures between 2 different femoral component designs used in direct anterior total hip arthroplasty.MethodsBeginning in February 2015, a single fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon performed 361 consecutive direct anterior total hip replacements using a flat, single-taper, wedged femoral implant. In June 2016, that same surgeon, using the exact same surgical technique and postoperative weight-bearing protocol, began using a dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant for 789 consecutive hips. The patients were carefully monitored for 3 months after surgery to identify the frequency of periprosthetic femur fractures. A Fisher’s exact test was used to determine if the prevalence of periprosthetic femur fractures differed between the 2 implant designs.ResultsFive of 361 (1.4%) patients sustained proximal femur fractures at an average of 19.6 days postoperatively in the first group, all demonstrating a Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture and requiring femoral revision. No patients (0/789, 0%) in the second cohort sustained a postoperative, periprosthetic fracture (P = .006).ConclusionIn this comparison of 2 consecutive cohorts, the dual-taper, hydroxyapatite-coated implant had a statistically significant lower postoperative periprosthetic fracture rate than a flat, single-taper, wedged design.     

Evaluation of osteosynthesis with dual fibular bone grafting for neglected femoral neck fractures

BackgroundFemoral neck fractures in young adults is an unsolved problem and neglected femoral neck fractures presents more challenge to the orthopaedics surgeon if femoral head salvage is attempted. We reviewed the operative results of neglected femoral neck fractures in young adults with fixation with dual fibular bone grafting Purpose of study was evaluation of epidemiological, clinical, functional, rehabilitative outcome and complications in such patients.MethodsTwentyeight patients in age group 18–50 years were operated having fracture neck femur by dual fibular bone grafting in the Department of Orthopaedics, S.N. Medical College, Agra in (May 2005–February 2008) and divided into two groups. Group A: comprised of 8 patients treated by dual fibular bone grafting alone and Group B: comprised of 18 patients treated by dual fibular bone grafting with single cancellous hip screw.ResultsAll the patients of the present series were having neglected intracapsular fracture, neck femur which were treated by dual fibular bone grafting with or without cancellous hip screw fixation. Majority of the patients had good to fair result according to Larson method with average time of union 16 weeks. All patients had useful range of movement at hip. Satisfactory union was achieved in all patients except two.ConclusionDouble bone grafting is a simple and cost effective modality of treatment for late femoral neck fracture with good results. It is a stable and biological method of fixation with preservation of natural femoral head with fewer complications.     

Monolithic Dual Mobility Cup Total Hip Arthroplasty Has High Complication Rates With Surgical Fixation in Elderly With Femur Neck Fracture

BackgroundThis study is prospectively conducted to evaluate surgical complications of monolithic dual mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with fractured neck of the femur.MethodsNinety-seven patients (97 hips) with displaced femoral neck fracture who gave informed consent for participation were prospectively enrolled. Their mean age was 76.6 years (range, 60-95 years), and the mean bone mineral density T-score of neck of the femur was −2.8 (range, −1.2 to −5.5). All patients underwent THA with monolithic dual mobility cup, and computed tomography scans were obtained to evaluate radiographic parameters including anteversion, inclination, and loosening of acetabular cups, and periprosthetic acetabular fractures.ResultsWith regard to cup orientation, mean inclination angle was 40.2° (range, 23.5°-63°) and mean anteversion was 32.6° (range, 7°-66.2°). The proportion of surgical outliers was 10.3% (10/97) in inclination and 35.1% (34/97) in anteversion. Early cup loosening within 2 weeks was detected in 2 hips. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures were identified in 6 hips (6/97, 6.2%). Of the 6 fractures, 5 nondisplaced fractures were healed with conservative management, but 1 fracture with displacement eventually led to cup loosening and the patient underwent revision surgery. Reoperation rate of the monolithic dual mobility cup was 4.1% (4/97).ConclusionThe use of the monolithic dual mobility was associated with improper cup fixation and periprosthetic acetabular fractures in the elderly with poor bone stock, although the dual mobility cup lowered the risk of early dislocation after THA.     

Incidence and morbidity of concomitant spine fractures in combat-related amputees

Background contextHigh-energy blasts are the most frequent cause of combat-related amputations in Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF). The nondiscriminating effects of this mechanism often result in both appendicular and axial skeletal injuries. Despite this recognized coincident injury pattern, the incidence and consequence of spine fractures in trauma-related combat amputees are unknown.PurposeThis study sought to determine the incidence and morbidity of the associated spine fractures on patients with traumatic lower extremity amputation sustained during OIF/OEF.Study design/settingRetrospective case control.Patient sampleTwo hundred twenty-six combat-related lower extremity amputees presenting to a single institution and injured between 2003 and 2008 were included for analysis.Outcome measuresPhysiologic and functional outcome measures were used to determine the influence of spine fractures on combat amputees. Physiologic measures included intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, injury severity score (ISS), rate of narcotic/neuropathic pain use, and heterotopic ossification (HO) rates. Functional outcome measures included return-to-duty rates and ambulatory status at final follow-up.MethodsData from 300 consecutive combat-related lower extremity amputations were retrospectively reviewed and grouped. Group 1 consisted of amputees with associated spine fractures, and Group 2 consisted of amputees without spine fractures. The results of the two groups were compared with regard to initial presentation and final functional outcomes.ResultsA total of 226 patients sustained 300 lower extremity amputations secondary to combat-related injuries, the most common mechanism being an improvised explosive device. Twenty-nine of these patients had a spine fracture (13%). Group 1 had a higher ISS than Group 2 (30 vs. 19, p<.001). Group 1 patients were also more likely to be admitted to the ICU (86% vs. 46%, p<.001). Furthermore, Group 1 patients had a significantly higher rate of HO in their residual limbs (82% vs. 55%, p<.005).ConclusionsThe incidence of spine fractures in combat-related amputees is 13%. The results suggest that combat-related amputees with spine fractures are more likely to sustain severe injuries to other body systems, as indicated by the significantly higher ISS and rates of ICU admission. This group also had a significantly higher rate of HO formation, which may be attributable to the greater local and/or systemic injuries sustained by these patients.     

Fragility fracture following total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundWhile periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are a well-known phenomenon for orthopedic surgeons, fragility fractures following THA are also a significant, though less studied, concern. Furthermore, patients who have undergone THA have several additional risk factors for fragility fractures, including motor weakness, bone atrophy, and limping. The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of fragility fractures following THA and to clarify the characteristics of these fractures.MethodsThis study included 5678 primary THA procedures in 4589 female patients. This study evaluated body morphology data, disease type leading to THA, Japanese Orthopaedic Association hip score, range of motion of the hip joint, and medical history. Distal radius and patella fractures were defined as fragility fractures. Risk factors for fragility fractures after THA were calculated by comparing the fragility fracture group with the non-fracture group.ResultsFifty-three fragility fractures were confirmed in 53 patients (distal radius fracture: 32 fractures in 32 patients, patella fracture: 21 fractures in 21 patients). In the univariate analysis, the following eight risk factors for fragility fractures were significantly different between the groups: height, weight, follow-up period, developmental dysplasia of the hip, primary osteoarthritis, abduction before THA, internal rotation before THA, and external rotation before THA. Medical histories were not significantly different between the groups. There was no difference in any study factor and in the time of occurrence between the radius fractures and patella fractures analyzed as fragility fractures.ConclusionsThis study revealed that there are significant preoperative factors of fragility fractures following THA. These factors will serve as useful data for THA treatment strategies, preoperative explanations, and future studies.     

Concomitant hip and upper extremity fracture in elderly patients: Prevalence and clinical implications

BackgroundHip fracture and upper extremity fracture are most important age-related fracture. However, there have been few reports about the analysis of prevalence or risk factors with concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and clinical implications of the concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures in elderly.MethodsWe evaluate 1018 patients aged >65 years who were surgically treated for femoral neck or intertrochanteric fractures between March 2008 and December 2018. 35 patients (3.4%) with a hip fracture combined upper extremity fracture. All patients were classified into the isolated hip fracture and the concomitant fracture. We analyzed these patients’ characteristics such as age, gender, bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K), injury mechanism, and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe most common site of upper extremity fracture was distal radius fracture of 15 patients (42.8%), followed by proximal humeral fracture of 8 (22.8%). Concomitant fractures occurred on the same side in 30 patients (85.7%). The mean age of patients with a concomitant fracture was younger than that of patients with an isolated hip fracture (p < 0.05). Mean preinjury MMSE-K was 22.7 in isolated hip fracture and 25.6 in concomitant fracture patients (p < 0.05). Mean length of hospital stay was statistically significant different between two groups (p < 0.05). According to fracture site of hip, there was no statistically different prevalence of upper extremity fracture in femoral intertrochanteric fracture compared to the neck fracture.ConclusionWe found a 3.4% prevalence of concomitant hip and upper extremity fractures. It was found that the younger the age with preserved cognitive ability in elderly patients with a hip fracture, the higher the prevalence of upper extremity fracture. In addition, it is important to keep in mind that patients with a concomitant fracture have a longer hospital stay and difficulty in rehabilitation.     

Orthopaedic injuries associated with hip fractures in those aged over 60 years: a study of patterns of injury and outcomes for 1971 patients

IntroductionThere has been little research into the consequence of suffering a hip fracture and associated orthopaedic injures. The aim of this research paper is to describe the patient characteristics, patterns of injury and to define the effect on outcomes of orthopaedic injuries occurring simultaneously with hip fractures.Patients and methodsHip fracture data was collected prospectively. Patients under 60 years of age were excluded from the study. Between 2004 and 2010 we treated 1971 consecutive patients aged 60 years or older with a hip fracture.Results81 (4.1%) patients sustained a simultaneous fracture or dislocation. 90% (73/81) of these injuries were in the upper limb and 88% (71/81) were ipsilateral, with the wrist (34 cases) and the proximal humerus (21 cases) being the commonest site of injury. Median hospital stay was significantly longer for those with additional injures. Pubic rami fractures were not seen in association with a hip fracture.Those patients who sustained a concomitant wrist fracture tended to be slightly fitter than those without associated injuries whist those with an associated humeral fracture were slightly frailer. Mortality was increased for those with an associated proximal humeral fracture but was lower with an associated wrist fracture.Discussion and conclusionSimultaneous injuries occurring with hip fractures are mainly seen in the ipsilateral upper limb. They present a greater challenge to the multidisciplinary team than a solitary hip fracture, experiencing a longer hospital stay and inevitably a higher financial cost. Those patients with wrist fractures have the best prognosis in terms of mortality, whereas a proximal humerus fracture may indicate a higher risk of mortality.     

Influence of coincident distal radius fracture in patients with hip fracture: single-centre series and meta-analysis

BackgroundHip and wrist fractures are the most common orthopaedic injuries. Combined hip and distal radius fractures are an important clinical and public health problem, since mobilisation and rehabilitation is challenging and likely to be prolonged in this setting. Few studies have explored the influence of an associated wrist fracture in patients with hip fracture. We present the largest series of patients with concomitant hip and wrist fractures. We perform the first meta-analysis of the literature on patients with concurrent hip and wrist fractures.ResultsPatients with the combined fracture were of a similar age compared to those with isolated hip fracture. There were a significantly higher proportion of women in the cohort with both hip and wrist fractures (female:male ratio of 9:1 versus 4:1 p < 0.0001). The combination fracture group had a greater length of hospitalisation (18 vs 13 days p < 0.0001). The survivorship of both groups was not significantly different even after adjustment for age and gender. Meta-analysis of the literature showed female preponderance, increased length of stay but no significant difference in survival in patients with concomitant hip and wrist fractures.ConclusionThe combination fracture occurs much more commonly in women and patients require a greater length of hospitalisation. The patients who sustained simultaneous hip and wrist fractures experienced no statistically significant difference in survivorship when compared to those who suffer isolated hip fractures. This is not withstanding the presence of two fractures. This difference in mortality did not reach statistical significance.

Level of evidence

Level III (retrospective comparative study).