Selective fascicular coaptation of free functioning gracilis transfer for restoration of independent thumb and finger flexion following Volkmann ischemic contracture

Children are prone to developing moderate to severe Volkmann ischemic contracture following a supracondylar fracture of the humerus or its treatment. Given the variable extent of forearm muscle damage, tendon transfers and tenodeses are often unavailable. To address these contractures, intensive hand therapy and a free functioning muscle transfer are required. Despite functional improvement following free muscle transplantation, reconstructed patients with severe Volkmann ischemic contracture tend to have persistent difficulty with fine motor activities owing to the losses of intrinsic muscle function and independence of thumb and finger flexion. The authors demonstrate how selective coaptation of separate fascicular territories of the gracilis nerve branches to the branches of the anterior interosseous nerve that innervate flexor pollicis longus and flexor digitorum profundus may be performed to establish a degree of independent thumb and finger flexion with a single free gracilis transfer. This technical refinement as well as its long-term outcomes in a series of three patients is presented.     

Bilateral elbow flexion reconstruction with functioning free muscle transfer for obstetric brachial plexus palsy

A child suffered a bilateral obstetric brachial plexus palsy involving the C5 and C6 nerve roots. Abduction of the shoulder joints had recovered by 1 year, but elbow flexion did not recover on either side. Free gracilis muscle transfers were performed on both sides, at an interval of 6 months, to achieve elbow flexion. The spinal accessory nerve was used as the donor nerve.     

Transfer of one fascicle of ulnar nerve to functioning free gracilis muscle transplantation for elbow flexion

Background: In brachial plexus injury, elbow flexion is the first priority in reconstruction. Neglected cases need functioning free muscle transplantation that requires the donor nerve to supply the transplanted muscle. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and results of transferring one fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the transplanted gracilis muscle. Methods: One woman and two men with neglected avulsions of the C5,C6 roots of the brachial plexus underwent free gracilis muscle transfer for elbow flexion. One fascicle of the ulnar nerve was used as the donor nerve. Results: The mean period of follow‐up was 33.3 months. The average reinnervation time of gracilis muscle was 3.7 months. At the final examination, the mean strength of elbow flexion was 4.3 kgf. The grip strength, moving two‐point discrimination and the strength of the wrist volar flexion on the affected side was not worse than before surgery in any patient at the last follow‐up examination. Conclusions: A fascicle of the ulnar nerve can be one of the most effective options for functioning free muscle transplantation for elbow flexion.     

Obturator nerve injury associated with femur fracture fixation detected during gracilis muscle harvesting for functioning free muscle transfer

A rare case is reported in which injury of the motor nerve of the gracilis (obturator nerve) was detected during its harvesting for functioning free muscle transfer. The probable cause of this rare injury was considered to be accidental penetration while drilling for a proximal locking screw in intramedullary nailing during previous femur fracture surgery.     

Technique of harvesting the gracilis for free functioning muscle transplantation

In this article, we describe our technique and experience in harvesting the gracilis muscle for free functioning muscle transplantation (FFMT). The gracilis is the most commonly used muscle for FFMT. The main indication for gracilis FFMT is traumatic brachial plexus injury. Gracilis muscle has a class 2 vascular pedicle, with a dominant vascular pedicle originating from the profunda femoris vessels and a single motor nerve originating from the obturator nerve. During gracilis harvest, it is important to include the entire fascia around the muscle to ensure vascularity of the skin paddle and enhance muscle gliding in its new bed. Mobilization of the adductor longus allows tracing of the pedicle to its origin from the profunda femoris vessels, hence, achieving the maximum available length of the pedicle. Lengthening of gracilis tendon with a periosteal strip provides a free gracilis long enough to span the distance from the clavicle to the distal forearm. The main complications are related to the wound, and these include delayed healing, infection, and scar-related problems. The functional deficit after gracilis harvest is negligible.     

Functional outcome of extensor carpi radialis longus transfer for finger flexion in posttraumatic flexor muscle loss

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional outcome after extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) transfer for restoration of finger flexion in patients with flexor muscle loss after direct trauma. METHODS: We evaluated 8 patients who had ECRL transfer between 1995 and 2003. Flexion gained was assessed by measuring the digit-to-palm distance (DPD). The grip strength was compared with that of the opposite normal limb. The average follow-up period was 41 months. We compared the results obtained with other modalities of restoration of finger flexion, namely a pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle transfer or a free functioning muscle transfer (FFMT) using the series available in the literature. RESULTS: Four patients had a good result with a DPD of 0 cm in all fingers and an average grip strength of 65% of the opposite hand. Two patients had an average result with a DPD of 1.5, 2, 1.7, and 1.5 cm for the index, middle, ring, and small fingers, respectively, and an average grip strength of 58%; 2 patients had a poor result with a DPD of 5.0, 5.5, 5.0, and 3.0 cm for the index, middle, ring, and small fingers, respectively, and with an average grip strength of 21% of the opposite hand. CONCLUSIONS: The ECRL transfer yields good results if the intrinsic muscles of the hand are functioning, the extensor compartment is uninjured, and the lower third of the forearm where the tendon junction is performed is relatively unscarred. In such instances the range of movement and grip strength achieved are better than a latissimus dorsi muscle pedicle graft and are comparable with a FFMT. This is achieved earlier than the time taken for reinnervation of FFMT and without the attendant risks for flap failure. The ECRL transfer for finger flexor restoration is a more simple alternative that should be considered when possible.     

肱肌肌支移位重建屈指功能的远期疗效

目的报道肌皮神经肱肌肌支移位后的远期疗效。方法对3例行肌皮神经肱肌肌支移位至屈指肌支者,术后随访2年以上,并测定其肌力与肌电。结果2例术前C5、6神经支配肌群良好者(肌力4°,肌电为单纯混合相),术后屈指功能恢复良好(肌力3°,肌电为单纯或单纯混合相)。另1例术前C5、6支配肌群仅个别肌肉良好(肌力3°,肌电为单纯相),术后功能未恢复。结论肱肌肌支的功能状态是影响术后疗效的主要因素,术前C5、6神经根支配的肌群功能状态全面良好者,肱肌肌支移位术后屈指功能恢复良好。     

Nerve transfer with functioning free muscle transplantation

In this article, the author focuses on functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT), an advanced microneurovascular technique indicated in patients who have an advanced injury with a major brachial muscle or muscle group loss or denervation and in whom no locally available or ideal musculotendinous donor unit exists. FFMTs have been successfully applied clinically in cases involving adult brachial plexus palsy, obstetric brachial plexus palsy, facial palsy, severe Volkmann's ischemia, and severe crushing and traction injuries of the forearm or arm with major muscle loss. As the author notes, FFMT is a new challenge for the reconstructive surgeon. He outlines the eight major principles for nerve transfer with FFMT, basing his conclusions on the more than 333 patients who received FFMT between 1995 and 2005 in his hospital.     

Functioning free muscle transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury patients

BackgroundRestoration of elbow function in traumatic brachial plexus injury patients remains the priority in the reconstruction of the involved extremity. In cases of complete nerve root injuries and in delayed cases, the only option for elbow reconstruction is the functional free muscle transfer. The purpose of this paper was to present the clinical outcomes and complications of functioning free muscle transfers using the gracilis muscle for the restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injury patients in a tertiary institution from January 1, 2005 to January 31, 2014.Patient and methodsA retrospective review of all patients who had functioning free muscle transfers for elbow flexion was done with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Outcome measures were elbow flexion in terms of range of motion in degrees, muscle strength of the transferred muscle, VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain, postoperative DASH scores and complications of the procedure.ResultsThere were 39 males and three females. The average age at the time of surgery was 28.6 (SD, 8.5) years. The average delay to surgery was 16 months (range, 3–120 months). The flap success rate for viability was achieved in 38 of 42 patients. The average follow-up for the 38 patients was 30 months (range, 12–103 months, SD 19 months). Success rate of at least M3/5 muscle strength was achieved in 37 of 42 patients with an average range of elbow flexion of 107° (SD, 20.4°). The average post-operative VAS for pain was 3.6 (SD, 3.0). The average post-operative DASH score was 43.09 (SD, 14.9). There were a total of 10 minor complications and five major complications.ConclusionFunctioning free muscle transfer using the gracilis muscle was a reliable procedure in the restoration of elbow flexion in patients with incomplete brachial plexus injury treated beyond 6 months from the time of injury and in patients with complete injuries.     

Technical considerations in two-stage functioning free muscle transplantation reconstruction of both flexor and extensor functions of the forearm

We report on two patients with severe injuries of the forearm who were reconstructed using functioning free muscle transplantation (FFMT) for individual replacement of flexor and extensor function. In both cases a two-stage procedure was performed: The extensor reconstruction preceded the flexor reconstruction by 4–6 months. The extensor digitorum communis and flexor digitorum profundus were successfully reconstructed in both cases using bilateral gracilis FFMT. In one case the flexor pollicis longus and extensor pollicis lon-gus were also reconstructed using the adductor longus in addition to the gracilis. Clinical follow-up was a minimum of 2 years. Both patients achieved wrist control, excellent finger flexion, and metacarpophalangeal joint extension. One patient also had good interphalangeal finger extension, but the other developed a persistent claw deformity due to the lack of recovery of ulnar nerve function. Performing the extensor reconstruction prior to the flexor reconstruction theoretically allows a more rapid return of function and a shorter rehabilitation period than using the converse sequence. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Three episodes of gracilis free muscle transfer under epidural anaesthesia.

The use of regional anaesthesia in major surgery is associated with a lower risk of complications. However, recent evidence suggests that a vascular steal phenomenon may result in a reduction of free flap blood flow in such patients. We report three cases of free gracilis transfer under epidural anaesthesia in patients who were considered high risk for general anaesthesia. Our experience suggests that there remains an important role for epidural anaesthesia in the management of patients undergoing lower limb free flap reconstruction. The inability to undergo general anaesthesia does not preclude free flap surgery in carefully selected patients.     

Brachialis muscle transfer to reconstruct finger flexion or wrist extension in brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE: Tendon transfers are a routine procedure used to improve hand function in brachial plexus injuries; however, muscles from forearm donors are not always available for transfer. In this situation a distant muscle may be used. This study describes transfer of the brachialis muscle to the forearm muscles to reconstruct finger flexion or wrist extension in patients with brachial plexus injuries. METHODS: In 6 patients the brachialis muscle was transferred to the flexor digitorum profundus and the flexor pollicis longus to restore finger and thumb flexion with the goal of reconstructing a key pinch and hook grasp. In 3 patients the brachialis muscle was transferred to the extensor carpi radialis brevis to restore wrist extension. The patients were evaluated at regular intervals and had final assessments between 10 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Brachialis transfer to the flexor digitorum profundus and the flexor pollicis longus resulted in active motion with full range of digital flexion in the 2 patients who had partial flexion before surgery, and for the 4 patients who had no finger flexion before surgery it resulted in a pulp-to-palm distance for the middle finger of 1 cm in 3 patients and of 2 cm in 1 patient. A lateral key pinch and hook grasp reconstruction was achieved in all patients. Grasping and lateral pinch strengths averaged 110 and 94 mm Hg, respectively. When the brachialis was transferred to the wrist extensors the patients recovered 20 degrees of active wrist extension against resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Brachialis muscle transfer to the forearm muscle constitutes a valid strategy in the reconstruction of finger and thumb flexion and wrist extension after brachial plexus injury when forearm donor muscles are not available. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level IV.     

Functional lower lip reconstruction with a forearm flap combined with a free gracilis muscle transfer.

We applied a forearm flap combined with a gracilis muscle flap for total reconstruction of the lower lip. The motor nerve of the gracilis muscle was repaired to the buccal branch in the cheek. The patient obtained good sphincter function for eating and speaking, and he could inflate a balloon without air leakage.