High flow nasal cannula outside the ICU provides optimal care and maximizes hospital resources for patients with multiple rib fractures

BackgroundHigh flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use reduces work of breathing and improves oxygenation for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Limited prior work has explored protocolized use of HFNC for trauma patients outside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate use of HFNC for patients with rib fractures when therapy was standard of care on all floors of the hospital.MethodsIn 2018, the study hospital expanded use of HFNC (AIRVO; Fisher Paykel, Auckland, NZ) to all floors of the hospital, making it available in the ICU, Emergency Department (ED), and on general inpatient floors. The study group included adult patients with three or more rib fractures who received HFNC at any location in the hospital (Phase 2: January 2018-December 2019). The study group was compared to a historical control group when HFNC was available only in the ICU (Phase 1: March 2013-July 2015). Patients were excluded from the study if they received invasive mechanical ventilation prior to HFNC. Primary outcomes were mechanical ventilation rates, ICU days, length of hospitalization, and mortality.ResultsDuring the study period, 63 patients received HFNC, with 35% of patients (n = 22) receiving the duration of therapy outside the ICU. When compared to the control group (N = 63), there were no significant differences in total hospital days (9 vs. 9, p=.64), mechanical ventilation (19% vs. 13%, p=.47), or mortality (3% vs. 5%, p = 1.00). Twenty-seven percent of patients (n = 17) in the study group avoided the ICU during hospitalization.ConclusionsFindings suggest that HFNC therapy can be safely initiated and managed on all hospital floors for patients with multiple rib fractures. Making the therapy available outside the ICU may reduce healthcare resource use without adversely affecting patient outcomes.     

Prehospital personnel discretion pediatric trauma team activations: Too much of a good thing?

PurposeTrauma team activation is essential to provide rapid assessment of injured patients, however excessive utilization can overburden systems. We aimed to identify predictors of over triage and evaluate impact of prehospital personal discretion trauma activations on the over triage rate.MethodsRetrospective comparative study of pediatric trauma patients (<18 years) evaluated after activation of the trauma team to those evaluated as a trauma consult treated between 2010 and 2013. Cohort matching of trauma activated and consult patients was done on the basis of patients’ age and ISS.Results1363 patients including 359 trauma team activations were evaluated. Median age was 6 years, Injury Severity Score (ISS) 4, 116 (8.5%) required operative intervention and 20 (1.4%) died.Matched analysis using age and ISS showed trauma activated patients were more likely to have penetrating MOI (4.7% vs.1.7%; p = 0.03) and need ICU admission(32.9% vs.16.7%; p = 0.0001). State of Florida discrete criteria based trauma activated patients when compared to paramedic discretion activations had a higher ISS (9 vs.5; p = 0.014), need for ICU admission (36.5% vs.20.4%; p = 0.004), ICU LOS(2 vs.0 days; p = 0.02), hospital LOS(2 vs.2 days; p = 0.014) and higher likelihood of death(4.9% vs.0%;p = 0.0001). Moreover, paramedic discretion trauma activated patients were similar to trauma consult patients in terms of ISS score(p = 0.86), need for ICU admission(p = 0.86), operative intervention(p = 0.86), death(p = 0.86) and hospital LOS(p = 0.86), with a considerably higher cost of care(p = 0.0002).ConclusionDiscrete criteria-based trauma team activations appear to more reliably identify patients likely to benefit from initial multidisciplinary management.     

Intercostal nerve cryoablation during surgical stabilization of rib fractures decreases post-operative opioid use,ventilation days,and intensive care days

BackgroundIntercostal nerve cryoablation is an adjunctive measure that has demonstrated pain control, decrease in opioid consumption, and decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients who undergo surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF).MethodsSSRF patients from January 2015 to September 2021 were retrospectively compared. All patients received multimodal pain regimens post-operatively and the independent variable was intraoperative cryoablation.Results241 patients met inclusion criteria. 51 (21%) underwent intra-operative cryoablation during SSRF and 191 (79%) did not. Patients with standard treatment consumed 9.4 more daily MME (p = 0.035), consumed 73 percent more post-operative total MME (p = 0.001), spent 1.55 times as many days in the intensive care unit (p = 0.013), and spent 3.8 times as many days on the ventilator than patients treated with cryoablation, respectively. Overall hospital LOS, operative case time, pulmonary complications, MME at discharge, and numeric pain scores at discharge were no different (all p>0.05).ConclusionIntercostal nerve cryoablation during SSRF is associated with fewer ventilator days, ICU LOS, total post-operative, and daily opioid use without increasing time in the operating room or perioperative pulmonary complications.     

The impact of obesity on polytraumatized patients with operatively treated fractures

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on outcomes following operative treatment of fractures in obese polytrauma patients.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study at a level I trauma centre from January 2014 until December 2017. The eligibility criteria were adult (age >= 18 years) polytrauma patients who presented with at least one orthopaedic fracture that required operative fixation. Polytrauma was defined as having an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >= 16. Out of 891 patients, a total of 337 were included with 85 being obese. The primary outcome variable was the total hospital length of stay in days. The secondary outcome variables were the number of patients who had an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the ICU length of stay in days, the number of patients who had mechanical ventilation, the duration of mechanical ventilation in days, perioperative complications, and mortality.ResultsObesity was associated with increased total hospital stay (36 vs. 27 days; P<0.001), increased ICU stay (13 vs. 8 days; P = 0.04), increased ICU admissions (83.5% vs. 68.6%; P = 0.008) and increased incidence of mechanical ventilation (64.7% vs. 43.7%; P = 0.001). These findings remained statistically significant following adjusted regression models for age, gender, ISS, and injuries sustained. However, the mechanical ventilation duration was not significantly different between both groups on adjusted and unadjusted analyses. However, an increase per unit BMI significantly increases the duration of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02). In terms of complications, obesity was only associated with an increase in acute renal failure (ARF) on unadjusted analyses (P = 0.004). Whereas, adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that an increase per BMI unit led to a significant increase in the odds ratio for wound infection (P = 0.03) and ARF (P = 0.024).ConclusionsThis study displayed that obesity was detrimental to polytrauma patients with operatively treated fractures leading to prolonged hospital and ICU length of stay. This highlights the importance of optimizing trauma care for obese polytraumatized patients to reduce morbidity. With 41.1% of our population being obese, obesity presents a unique challenge in the care of polytrauma patients which mandates further research in improving health care for this population group.     

Identification of concomitant injuries associated with specific spine level fractures in polytrauma patients

IntroductionSpine fractures are associated with high energy mechanisms and can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality in the trauma setting. Rapid identification and treatment of these fractures and their associated injuries are paramount in preventing adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify concomitant skeletal and non-skeletal injuries related to cervical, thoracic, and lumbar fractures.MethodsA retrospective review of institutional American College of Surgeons (ACS) registry was conducted on 3,399 consecutive trauma patients identifying those with spine fractures from 1/2016–12/2019. Two-hundred ninety patients were included(8.5%) and separated into three groups based on fracture location: eighty-eight cervical(C)-spine, 129thoracic(T)-spine, and 143lumbar(L)-spine. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify associated injuries, presenting injury severity score(ISS) and Glasgow coma scale(GCS), mechanism of injury, demographic data, substance use, and paralysis for each group. Cox hazard regression was utilized to identify factors associated with inpatient mortality.ResultsC-spine fractures were associated with head trauma(OR2.18,p = 0.003),intracranial bleeding (OR2.64,p = 0.001),facial(OR2.25,p = 0.02) and skull fractures(OR3.92,p = 0.001),and cervical cord injuries(OR4.78,p = 0.012). T-spine fractures were associated with rib fractures(OR2.31,p = 0.003). L-spine fractures were associated with rib(OR1.77, p = 0.04), pelvic(OR5.11,p<0.001), tibia/fibula (OR2.31,p = 0.05), and foot/ankle fractures(OR3.32,p = 0.04), thoracic(OR2.43,p = 0.008) and retroperitoneal cavity visceral injuries(OR27.3,p = 0.001). Falls≤6meters were also significantly associated with C-spine fractures(OR1.70,p = 0.04) while falls>6meters were associated with L-spine fractures(OR4.30,p = 0.001). Inpatient mortality risk increased in patients with C-spine fractures(HR4.41,p = 0.002), higher ISS(HR1.05, p<0.001), and lower GCS(HR0.85,p<0.001). Last, patients≥65-years-old were more likely to experience C-spine fractures(OR1.88,p = 0.03).ConclusionPatients who experience fractures of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine are at risk for additional fractures, visceral injury, and/or death. Awareness of the associations between spinal fractures and other injuries can increase diagnostic efficacy, improve patient care, and provide valuable prognostic information. These associations highlight the importance of effective and timely communication and multidisciplinary collaboration.     

Mortality in polytrauma patients with moderate to severe TBI on par with isolated TBI patients: TBI as last frontier in polytrauma patients

BackgroundMortality caused by Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) remains high, despite improvements in trauma and critical care. Polytrauma is naturally associated with high mortality. This study compared mortality rates between isolated TBI (_ITBI) patients and polytrauma patients with TBI (_PTBI) admitted to ICU to investigate if concomitant injuries lead to higher mortality amongst TBI patients.MethodsA 3-year cohort study compared polytrauma patients with TBI (_PTBI) with AIS head ≥3 (and AIS of other body regions ≥3) from a prospective collected database to isolated TBI (_ITBI) patients from a retrospective collected database with AIS head ≥3 (AIS of other body regions ≤2), both admitted to a single level-I trauma center ICU. Patients <16 years of age, injury caused by asphyxiation, drowning, burns and ICU transfers from and to other hospitals were excluded. Patient demographics, shock and resuscitation parameters, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and mortality data were collected and analyzed for group differences.Results259 patients were included; 111 _PTBI and 148 _ITBI patients. The median age was 54 [33-67] years, 177 (68%) patients were male, median ISS was 26 [20-33]. Seventy-nine (31%) patients died. Patients with _PTBI developed more ARDS (7% vs. 1%, p = 0.041) but had similar MODS rates (18% vs. 10%, p = 0.066). They also stayed longer on the ventilator (7 vs. 3 days, p=<0.001), longer in ICU (9 vs. 4 days, p=<0.001) and longer in hospital (24 vs. 11 days, p=<0.001). TBI was the most prevalent cause of death in polytrauma patients. Patients with _PTBI showed no higher in-hospital mortality rate. Moreover, mortality rates were skewed towards _ITBI patients (24% vs. 35%, p = 0.06).DiscussionThere was no difference in mortality rates between _PTBI and _ITBI patients, suggesting TBI-severity as the predominant factor for ICU mortality in an era of ever improving acute trauma care.     

Pediatric burn-trauma patients have increased length of stay compared to trauma-only patients: A propensity matched analysis

BackgroundTrauma is the leading cause of mortality in children. Burn injury involves intensive resources, especially in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that among pediatric trauma patients, combined burn-trauma (BT) patients have increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality compared to trauma-only (T) patients.MethodsThe Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014–2016) was queried and BT patients were 1:2 propensity-score-matched to T patients based on age, gender, hypotension on admission, injury type and severity.Results93 BT patients were matched to 186 T patients. There were no differences in matched characteristics. BT patients had a longer median LOS (4 vs 2 days, p < 0.001) with no difference in mortality (1.1% vs 1.1%, p = 1.00), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (3 vs 3 days, p = 0.55), or complications including decubitus ulcer (0% vs 1.1%, p = 0.32), deep vein thrombosis (0% vs 0.5%, p = 0.48), extremity compartment syndrome (1.1% vs 0%, p = 0.16), and urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.1%, p = 1.00).ConclusionPediatric BT patients had twice the LOS compared to a matched group of pediatric T patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in ICU LOS, complications or mortality rate. When evaluating risk-stratified quality metrics such as LOS, concomitant burn injury should be incorporated.     

Frailty as a predictor of negative outcomes in trauma patients with rib fractures

BackgroundIn patients with rib fractures, adverse outcomes are associated with number of rib fractures; however, studies suggest an association with frailty. We assessed whether frailty, measured using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging clinical frailty scale, was associated with adverse outcomes in this population.MethodsPatients ≥50 years admitted for rib fractures from July 2015 to June 2020 were retrospectively scored for frailty. Demographics, comorbidities, injury information, hospital course, and complications were collected. Univariate analyses were performed to assess significant differences between the fit, prefrail, and frail groups. The association between number of rib fractures and frailty with outcomes was determined.ResultsControlling for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, preadmission anticoagulant, injury mechanism, and comorbidities and nonchest Abbreviated Injury Scores showing significant differences, the number of rib fractures was associated with developing pneumonia (odds ratio = 1.197 [1.076–1.332]; P = .001), hospital length of stay (odds ratio = 1.066 [1.033–1.100], P < .001), mortality (odds ratio = 1.157 [1.048–1.278], P = .004), and discharge to long-term acute care facilities (odds ratio = 1.295 [1.084–1.546], P = .004). Frailty was associated with hospital length of stay (odds ratio = 1.659 [1.059–2.598], P = .027) and discharge to skilled nursing facilities (odds ratio = 5.282 [1.567–17.802], P = .007).ConclusionIn our population, the number of rib fractures was associated with respiratory complications and mortality. Frailty was associated with longer hospitalization and discharge to higher level of care.     

Comparing epidemiologic features,outcomes, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of traumatic patients before and during COVID-19 pandemic: Data from the National Trauma Registry of Iran

PurposeTo prepare for future possible communicable disease epidemics/pandemics, health care providers should know how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced injured patients. This study aimed to compare epidemiologic features, outcomes, and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of trauma patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital before and during the pandemic.MethodsThis retrospective study was performed on data from the National Trauma Registry of Iran. All injured patients admitted to the hospital from July 25, 2016 to March 10, 2021 were included in the study. The patients were excluded if they had hospital length of stay less than 24 h. The injury outcomes, trauma mechanisms, and therapeutic and diagnostic procedures of the 2 periods: before (from July 25, 2016 to February 18, 2020) and during (from February 19, 2020 to March 10, 2021) COVID-19 pandemic were compared. All analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0 software (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).ResultsTotally, 5014 patients were included in the registry. Of them, 773 (15.4%) were registered after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic on February 19, 2020, while 4241 were registered before that. Gender, education level, and cause of injury were significantly different among the patients before and after the beginning of the pandemic (p < 0.001). In the ≤ 15 years and ≥ 65 years age groups, injuries decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < 0.001). The frequency of intensive care unit (ICU) admission decreased from 694 (16.4%) to 88 (11.4%) (p < 0.001). The mean length of stay at the hospital (days) and at the ICU (days) declined as follow: 8.3 (SD = 17.2) vs. 5.5 (SD = 6.1), p < 0.001 and 7.5 (SD = 11.5) vs. 4.5 (SD = 6.3), p < 0.022. The frequency of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures before and during the pandemic was as follows, respectively: ultrasonography 905 (21.3%) vs. 417 (53.9%) (p < 0.001), echocardiography 313 (7.4%) vs. 107 (13.8%) (p < 0.001), angiography 1597 (37.7%) vs. 534 (69.1%) (p < 0.001), MRI 166 (3.9%) vs. 51 (6.6%) (p < 0.001), surgery 3407 (80.3%) vs. 654 (84.6%) (p < 0.001), and internal/external fixation 1215 (28.6%) vs. 336 (43.5%) (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe pandemic affected the epidemiology of traumatic patients in terms of gender, age, educational level, and trauma mechanism. It changed the outcomes of injured patients: ICU admission, length of stay at the hospital and ICU decreased. The patients received more diagnostic and therapeutic procedures during the pandemic. To be more precise, more research is needed on the details.     

Long term outcomes following rib fracture fixation in patients with major chest trauma

BackgroundSevere chest injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical rib fixation has become a more commonplace procedure to improve chest wall mechanics, pain, and function. The aim of this study was to characterise the epidemiology and long-term functional outcomes of chest trauma patients who underwent rib fixation in a major trauma centre (MTC).MethodologyThis was a retrospective review (2014–19) of all adult patients with significant chest injury who had rib fixation surgery following blunt trauma to the chest. The primary outcome was functional recovery after hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, maximum organ support, tracheostomy insertion, ventilator days.Results60 patients underwent rib fixation. Patients were mainly male (82%) with median age 52 (range 24–83) years, injury severity score (ISS) of 29 (21–38), 10 (4–19) broken ribs, and flail segment in 90% of patients. Forty-six patients (77%) had a good outcome (GOSE grade 6–8). Patients in the poor outcome group (23%; GOSE 1–5) tended to be older [55 (39–83) years vs. 51 (24–78); p = 0.05] and had longer length of hospital stay [42 (19–82) days vs. 24 (7–90); p<0.01]. Injury severity, rate of mechanical ventilation or organ dysfunction did not affect long term outcome. Nineteen patients (32%) were not mechanically ventilated.ConclusionsRib fixation was associated with good long-term outcomes in severely injured patients. Age was the only predictor of long-term outcome. The results suggest that rib fixation be considered in patients with severe chest injuries and may also benefit those who are not mechanically ventilated but are at risk of deterioration.     

Outcomes following burn injury in intensive care patients with major psychiatric disorders

AimsPatients with psychiatric comorbidity have been shown to experience high rates of burn injury. Burn epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes have been sparsely documented for patients with major psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes in intensive care burn patients with pre-existing and acute major psychiatric disorders .MethodsA retrospective study was performed including intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed. Major psychiatric co-morbidities were collected according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 classifications. Patients were stratified according to F-diagnoses.ResultsA total of 1325 patients were included. 16.6 % of all patients had one or more major psychiatric disorders- 9.3 % with anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, somatoform and other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 9.2 % with mood (affective) disorders, 3.5 % with schizophrenia and other non-mood psychotic disorders, and 1.8 % with disorders of adult personality and behavior. Patients with major psychiatric disorders presented with significantly higher burn severity, reflected by higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) scores (5.9 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001) and larger total body surface area (TBSA) affected (15.9 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.002). Burned TBSA ≥ 30 and inhalation injuries were observed more frequently in patients with MDP, however without statistical significance. They also experienced prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (25.5 vs. 16.3 days, p < 0.001), prolonged intensive care unit LOS (14.8 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001), underwent surgical interventions (3.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation more frequently (34.1 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.43) and had significantly longer ventilation durations (73.5 vs. 31.2 h, p = 0.002). Mortality rates were lower compared to patients without major psychiatric disorders (5.9 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe prevalence of major psychiatric disorders in burn patients is considerably high. Patients with psychiatric comorbidities were found to have greater burn severity, prolonged total hospital and ICU LOS, underwent surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation more frequently and had prolonged ventilation duration. Our results highlight the importance of identifying burn patients with major psychiatric disorders who may necessitate additional resources and require extensive inpatient psychiatric care and counseling.     

The value of compassion: Healthcare savings of palliative care consults in trauma

BackgroundThe effects of palliative care (PC) consultation on patient costs and hospitalization metrics in the adult trauma population are unclear.Study DesignWe interrogated our Level I trauma center databases from 1/1/19 to 3/31/21 for patients age ≥18 admitted to the trauma service. Patients undergoing PC consult were matched using propensity scoring to those without PC consultation based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score and Head Abbreviated Injury Scale. Total costs, total cost per day, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, intubation days, discharge disposition, and rates of nephrology consultation and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements were compared.Results140 unique patients underwent PC consultation and were matched to a group not receiving PC consult during the same period. Median total costs in the PC cohort were $39,532 compared to $70,330 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per day in the PC cohort were $3,495 vs $17,970 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per ICU day in the PC cohort were $3,774 vs $17,127 in the controls (p<0.01).  Mean hospital LOS (15.7 vs 7 days), ICU LOS (7.9 vs 2.9 days), and ventilator days (5.1 vs 1.5) were significantly higher in the PC cohort (all p<0.01).  Rates of nephrology consultation (8.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.03) and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements (12.1 vs 1.4%, p<0.01) were also higher in the PC group.  Patients were more likely to discharge to hospice if they received a PC consult (33.6 vs 2.1%, p<0.01).  Mean time to PC consult was 7.2 days (range 1 hour to 45 days). LOS post-consult correlated positively with time to PC consultation (r = 0.27, p<0.01).ConclusionExpert PC services are known to alleviate suffering and avert patient goal- and value-incongruent care. While trauma patients demand significant resources, PC consultation offered in concordance with life-sustaining interventions is associated with significant savings to patients and the healthcare system. Given the correlation between LOS following PC consult and time to PC consult, savings may be amplified by earlier PC consultation in appropriate patients.     

Why routine intensive care unit admission after elective open infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm repair is no longer an evidence based practice

BackgroundElective open infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair is major surgery performed on high-risk patients. Routine ICU admission postoperatively is the current accepted standard of care. Few of these patients actually require a level of care that cannot be provided just as effectively in a surgical high dependency unit (HDU). Our aim was to determine, ‘can high risk patients that will require ICU admission postoperatively be reliably identified preoperatively?’.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all elective open infrarenal AAA repairs in our institution over a 3-year period was performed. The Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) model was used as our risk stratification tool for predicting post-operative morbidity. Renal function was also considered as a predictor of outcome, independent of the E-PASS.Results80% (n = 16) were admitted to ICU. Only 30% (n = 6) of the total study population necessitated intensive care. There were 9 complications in 7 patients in our study. The E-PASS comprehensive risk score (CRS)/Surgical stress score (SSS) were found to be significantly associated with the presence of a complication (p = 0.009)/(p = 0.032) respectively. Serum creatinine (p = 0.013) was similarly significantly associated with the presence of a complication.ConclusionsThe E-PASS model possessing increasing external validity is an effective risk stratification tool in safely deciding the appropriate level of post-operative care for elective infrarenal AAA repairs.     

Surgical strategy for femoral shaft fractures in severely injured patients: A 13-year experience from a tertiary trauma centre

BackgroundThe treatment strategy of femoral shaft fractures in polytraumatised patients has evolved over the years and led to improved outcomes for these patients. However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal treatment strategy and surgical care can differ markedly from one country to another. We investigate the surgical treatment strategy (Early Definitive Care (EDC) or Damage Control Orthopaedics (DCO)) implemented in the care of severely injured patients with femoral shaft fractures treated at a single tertiary trauma centre in southern Finland and factors affecting decision making.MethodsThe Helsinki Trauma Registry (HTR) was used retrospectively to identify severely injured patients (New Injury Severity Score [NISS] ≥ 16) treated from 2006 through to 2018 with concomitant femoral shaft fractures. Patients <16 years old, with isolated head injuries, dead on arrival and those admitted >24 h following the injury were excluded. Based on their initial surgical management strategy, femoral fracture patients were divided into EDC and DCO groups and compared.ResultsCompared to other trauma-registry patients, those with femoral shaft fractures are younger (30.9 ± 15.9 vs. 47.0 ± 19.7, p<0.001) and more often injured in road traffic accidents (64.1% vs. 34.4%, p<0.001). The majority (78%) of included patients underwent EDC. Patients who underwent DCO were significantly more severely injured (NISS: 40.1 ± 11.5 vs. 27.8 ± 10.1, p<0.001) with longer lengths of stay in ICU (15.4 ± 9.8 vs. 7.5 ± 6.1 days, p<0.001) and in hospital (29.9 ± 29.6 vs. 13.7 ± 11.4 days, p<0.001) than patients treated with EDC. Decision making was based primarily on injury related factors, while non-injury related factors may have contributed to choosing a DCO approach in a small number of cases.ConclusionEarly definitive care is the prevailing treatment strategy in severely injured femoral shaft fracture patients treated at a tertiary trauma centre. Patients treated with DCO strategy are more severely injured particularly having sustained worse intracranial and thoracic injuries. In addition to injury related factors, treatment strategy decision making was influenced by non-injury related factors in only a minority of cases.     

Impact of Hepatitis B virus infection on postoperative complications and length of stay in elderly patients with hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundOsteoporosis and subsequent fractures are common in the chronic hepatitis B (CHB) population, especially in the elderly. This study investigated the effects of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on postoperative outcomes following hip fracture surgery.MethodsThe study identified elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery at three academic tertiary care centres between January 2014 and December 2020. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes of 1,046 patients with HBV infection to 1,046 controls.ResultsThe seroprevalence of HBV among elderly patients undergoing hip surgery was 4.94%. The HBV cohort had significantly higher rates of medical complications (28.1 vs. 22.7%, p = 0.005), surgical complications (14.0 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.003), and unplanned readmissions (18.9 vs. 14.5%, p = 0.03) within 90 days of surgery. Patients with HBV infection were more likely to have increased length of stay (6.2 vs. 5.9 days, p = 0.009) and in-hospital charges (¥52,231 vs. ¥49,832, p < 0.00001). Multivariate logistic regression suggested that liver fibrosis and thrombocytopenia were independent risk factors for major complications and extended LOS.ConclusionPatients with HBV infection were at greater risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. We should pay more attention to the considerable burden of perioperative management of CHB patients. Due to the high proportion of undiagnosed patients in the Chinese elderly population, universal HBV screening should be considered preoperatively.     

Retrospective study of consecutive rib fracture patients treated by open reduction internal fixation in a single major trauma centre,UK.

IntroductionRib fractures are a common presentation in both patients presenting with high impact poly-trauma and as a result of low energy falls in the elderly. This injury can lead to various complications including prolonged hospital admission, pneumonia, need for ventilation and in admission to intensive care unit. There is much controversy around the management of this injury in the literature, with favourable outcomes for patients treated non-operatively as well as surgically.MethodsWe collated a database for all rib fracture fixations between 2014 and 2019 that took place at the major trauma centre in Liverpool. The decision to undergo surgical fixation was after discussion with multidisciplinary team at trauma meeting. Following British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOASTs), these injuries should ideally be operated on within 48 h.ResultsOverall, a total of 220 patients were included in the study (143 male and 77 female). 142 (64%) patients were operated on within 48 h of admission. A total of 101 (45%) patients required admission to ITU. Those in the early surgical fixation group had a statistically significant decrease in their hospital length of stay (12.8 days compared to 15.5 days, p=<0.001). Mean length of ITU stay was shorter in the early surgical group with no statistical significance (p = 0.1). Those patients that required mechanical ventilation in turn stayed in hospital for a longer period compared to those who did not (p=<0.001). There is no statistical difference in survival between the 2 patient groups (p = 0.3).DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the largest data set published in the rib fracture fixation cohort. Our results agree with previous studies which have demonstrated that those who undergo ORIF tend require fewer days of hospital stay, less ventilatory support and overall have better outcomes in terms of pain when compared to those treated non-operatively. Our study adds that patients who receive treatment within 48-hours as per BOAST guidelines have better outcomes, specifically reducing hospital length of stay by nearly 4 days (p = 0.014).ConclusionEarly surgical fixation of rib fractures leads to significantly favoured outcomes.     

Are bilateral tibial shaft fractures associated with an increased risk for adverse outcome?

IntroductionLong bone fractures are assumed to be an independent risk factor for systemic complications and death after trauma. Multiple studies have identified an increased risk for mortality and morbidity in patients with bilateral femoral fractures. Data about bilateral tibial shaft fractures is rare. The aim of our study was to analyze if patients with bilateral tibial shaft fractures are at higher risk for systemic complications.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU^® from 1993 to 2008. Inclusion criteria were unilateral or bilateral tibial shaft fractures and an age ≥16. Additionally to the overall collective we analyzed different subgroups (divided into different injury severities and treatment periods).Results1899 patients with unilateral and 175 patients with bilateral tibial shaft fractures were included. Age, gender and mean ISS (25.8 vs. 26.2, p = 0.51) in the two groups were comparable. Regarding the entire study population, patients with bilateral tibial shaft fractures showed no significant higher incidence of respiratory organ failure (29.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.076) or mortality (20.0% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.203). However, subgroup analysis showed a significant higher rate of pulmonary organ failure for bilateral tibial shaft fractures as compared to unilateral tibial shaft fractures in the group ISS < 25 (20.7% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.023). Multivariate regression analysis identified the additional tibial shaft fracture as an independent risk factor for pulmonary organ failure (OR = 1.56) but not for mortality.DiscussionThe additional tibial shaft fracture is an independent risk factor for pulmonary organ failure but not for multiple organ failure or mortality. The impact of the additional tibial shaft fracture is especially pronounced in less severely injured patients (ISS < 25). These findings are comparable to results of bilateral femoral fracture studies and we therefore suggest to treat patients with bilateral tibial shaft fractures with the same caution as those with bilateral femoral fractures.     

Proximal femoral fracture and female gender are risk factors for recurrent fracture: Cohort study of 292 patients over 75 years-old with iterative osteoporotic fractures

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to: 1/ describe the characteristics of a cohort of patients over 75 years of age hospitalized in perioperative geriatric units (UPOG) for iterative fractures; 2/ investigate the risks of institutionalization related to the first fracture; and 3/ search for potential risk factors for iterative fracture.MethodsThis is a retrospective single-center study analyzing patients over 75 years old, hospitalized in UPOG.ResultsOf the 3207 patients hospitalized, 292 patients had a refracture (9.1%), with a mean age of 85.4+/-5.8 years. Initial fractures were mainly intertrochanteric (43.2%) and the femoral neck (32.9%). Refractures occurred mainly in the first year (55.5%), with a median delay of 9.6 months. Refractures were mainly intertrochanteric (29.5%), peri‑implant (prosthesis, osteosynthesis) (28.8%), and femoral neck (26.7%). Dementia was the only factor for institutionalization after the first fracture episode (p = 0.0002).Proximal femoral fracture (PFF) and female gender were risk factors for iterative fracture (10.2% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.003; 10.7% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.005 respectively), but not age (85.4 vs. 85.8 years, p = 0.24). PFF were more likely to result in the same fracture type in the second episode (58.1% vs 7.1%, p<0.0001). The time to refracture was shorter in case of peri‑implant fracture (p = 0.0002), or discharge directly to home (p = 0.04).ConclusionPFF and female gender are risk factors for recurrent fracture, which is even more likely to occur early in case of home discharge or peri‑implant fracture.     

Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures.DesignSystematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019.SettingHospitalized patients.InterventionsVHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions.MeasurementsPrimary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.ResultsVHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay.ConclusionViscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice.