The utility of the growth hormone (GH) releasing hormone-arginine test for diagnosing GH deficiency in adults with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial irradiation

CONTEXT: The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is the current standard diagnostic test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD), but alternative tests, such as the GHRH-arginine test, have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the GHRH-arginine test using ITT as the gold standard in diagnosing GHD in a group of young adults treated with cranial irradiation (CRT) for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We estimated the positive and negative predictive values of the GHRH-arginine test among patients as well as a number of individual characteristics and therapy-related factors during both the GHRH-arginine test and ITT. DESIGN: Forty-three young adults, treated for childhood ALL with 18-30 Gy CRT and chemotherapy, were studied, and comparison was made with matched controls. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated four different cutoff levels for GHD in the GHRH-arginine test: 5, 7.5, 9, and 16.5 microg/liter. Using 7.5 microg/liter as the cutoff yielded high specificity (94%), but at the same time the sensitivity was only 66%, which leads to a low negative predictive value (27%). In contrast, a failed GH response to the GHRH-arginine test accurately reflects the presence of radiation-induced GHD, illustrated by a high positive predictive value (95% at 7.5 microg/liter). Only age at CRT and body mass index remained significant predictors of the peak GH during the GHRH-arginine test. Because a high proportion of GHD patients show a normal response to the GHRH-arginine test, it cannot be used reliably to exclude GHD in these patients. Complementary ITT is also warranted to confirm GHD in obese patients.     

Attenuated pulse size, disorderly growth hormone and prolactin secretion with preserved nyctohemeral rhythm distinguish irradiated from surgically treated acromegaly patients

BACKGROUND: Radiation induces time-dependent loss of anterior pituitary function, attributed to damage of the pituitary gland and hypothalamic centres. The development of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in irradiated acromegaly patients is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Detailed analysis of spontaneous 24-h GH and prolactin (PRL) secretion in relation to other pituitary functions and serum IGF-I concentrations in an attempt to find criteria for GHD in acromegalic patients with a GH response < 3 microg/l during the insulin tolerance test (ITT). DESIGN: Plasma hormone profiles obtained by 10 min sampling for 24 h in postoperatively irradiated acromegalic patients, compared with patients cured by surgery only and matched healthy controls. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: University setting. Fifteen subjects in each group. OUTCOME MEASURES: GH and PRL secretory parameters quantified by deconvolution, cluster, cosinor and approximate entropy (ApEn) analyses, IGF-I concentrations. RESULTS: Irradiation attenuated pulsatile secretion of GH and PRL, but total PRL secretion was unchanged. GH and PRL secretory regularity were diminished. Circadian timing remained intact. Pulsatile GH secretion and IGF-I were correlated (R = 0.30, P = 0.04). Criteria of pulsatile GH secretion = 12 microg/l/24 h and ApEn = 0.800 separated 12 of 15 irradiated patients from all others. CONCLUSION: Irradiated acromegaly patients with a subnormal GH response to ITT have very limited spontaneous GH secretion, with specific attenuation of the size of GH bursts and a highly irregular pattern, but with retained diurnal properties. These patients are thus likely GH-deficient and might benefit from GH replacement.     

Different responses of growth hormone secretion to guanfacine, bromocriptine, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegalic patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-containing and mixed GH/prolactin-containing pituitary adenomas

There is great variability in the GH secretory responses to different stimuli in patients with acromegaly. In the present study, we compared the effects on GH secretion of two compounds (bromocriptine and TRH), which presumably act directly at the pituitary level, with the effect of the centrally acting alpha-adrenergic agonist guanfacine in 14 untreated acromegalic patients. These in vivo responses of GH release were correlated with the results of immunocytochemical studies of the pituitary adenomas. In nine patients with pure GH-containing adenomas, GH secretion was suppressed by bromocriptine by more than 50% in one patient, while TRH stimulated GH release by more than 100% in another patient. Guanfacine (2 mg, orally) did not elicit a change in circulating GH levels in any of these nine patients. In the group of five patients with mixed GH/PRL-containing adenomas, however, bromocriptine suppressed GH levels by more than 50% in all patients, and TRH stimulated GH release by more than 100% in four of them. Guanfacine stimulated GH secretion significantly in four of these five patients. Guanfacine inhibited GH secretion significantly in five other acromegalic patients who had been treated 5-10 yr previously by external pituitary irradiation. We conclude that in acromegaly, the presence of PRL within the GH-secreting pituitary adenoma makes GH secretion more sensitive to bromocriptine and TRH, while normal sensitivity to hypothalamus-mediated stimulation (alpha-adrenergic agonist) is retained to some extent. In contrast, pure GH-secreting tumors responded little or not at all to bromocriptine, TRH, or guanfacine.     

Clinical implications of residual growth hormone (GH) response to provocative testing in adults with severe GH deficiency

CONTEXT: The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on provocative tests of GH release, all influenced by clinical factors. It is unknown whether the amount of residual GH reserve under the cutoff value has any physiological implication. OBJECTIVES: We used a large pharmacoepidemiological database of adult GHD (KIMS) and tested the impact of confounding factors on GH release of no greater than 3 microg/liter after an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and evaluated its potential physiological role. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PATIENTS: A total of 1098 patients fulfilled the criteria of having a GH peak of no greater than 3 microg/liter during ITT as well as documented IGF-I levels. OUTCOMES: The impact of underlying hypothalamic-pituitary disease, age, gender, body weight, as well as treatment modalities such as irradiation on peak GH level to ITT was evaluated, and the correlations between GH peak and targets of GH action were analyzed. RESULTS: The GH response to ITT was regulated by gender, age, and the number of additional pituitary deficiencies. In a multivariate evaluation, the extent of hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction was the most important single predictor of GH peak in ITT. GH peaks in ITT were positively related to IGF-I levels and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, as well as inversely to triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: Even in adult severe GHD, GH release appears to be regulated by factors defined to play an important role in normal GH secretion. The impact of very low GH release on IGF-I and lipid parameters indicates a persistent physiological role of low GH concentrations in severely affected patients with GHD.     

Update on the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults

GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of GHD is generally straightforward in children as growth retardation is present; however, in adults, diagnosis of GHD is often challenging. Other markers are therefore needed to identify adults who have GHD and could potentially benefit from GH replacement therapy. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adult GHD recommend provocative testing of GH secretion for patients who have evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary disease, patients with childhood-onset GHD, and patients who have undergone cranial irradiation or have a history of head trauma. Suspicion of GHD is also heightened in the presence of other pituitary hormone deficits. Tests for GHD include measurement of the hormone in urine or serum or measurement of stimulated GH levels after administration of various provocative agents. The results of several studies indicate that non-stimulated serum or urine measurements of GH levels cannot reliably predict deficiency in adults. Although glucagon and arginine tests produce a pronounced GH response with few false positives, the insulin tolerance test (ITT) is currently considered to be the gold standard of the GH stimulation tests available. Unfortunately, the ITT has some disadvantages and questionable reproducibility, which have prompted the development of several new tests for GHD that are based on pharmacological stimuli. Of these, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) plus arginine and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide (GHRP) appear to be reliable and practical. Thus, in cases where ITT is contraindicated or inconclusive, the combination of arginine and GHRH is an effective alternative. As experience with this test as well as with GHRH/GHRP-6 accumulates, they may supplant ITT as the diagnostic test of choice.     

Cranially irradiated adult cancer survivors may have normal spontaneous GH secretion in the presence of discordant peak GH responses to stimulation tests (compensated GH deficiency)

Context We have previously demonstrated that spontaneous (physiological) GH secretion was entirely normal in cranially irradiated patients who had normal individual peak GH responses to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) but reduced maximal somatotroph reserve as indicated by substantially reduced group GH responses to the GHRH + arginine stimulation test (AST). The normality of spontaneous GH secretion was attributed to a compensatory increase in hypothalamic stimulatory input within a partially damaged hypothalamic–pituitary (h–p) axis. It is unknown, however, if such compensatory stimulation can also maintain normality of GH secretion in those who fail the ITT but pass the GHRH + AST. Study subjects and design We studied 24‐h spontaneous GH secretion by 20‐min sampling both in the fed state (n = 11) and in the last 24 h of a 33‐h fast (n = 9) in adult cancer survivors with subnormal peak GH responses to the ITT but either normal or relatively less attenuated peak GH responses to the GHRH + AST. The study was conducted 8·3 ± 1·8 (range 2–23) years after cranial irradiation for nonpituitary brain tumours (n = 9) or leukaemia/lymphoma (n = 2) in comparison with 30 normal controls (fasting, 14). Results Previously published diagnostic thresholds for the ITT, GHRH + AST and spontaneous GH secretion were used to characterize GH secretion. Four of the 11 patients with impaired stimulated responses to both tests showed only minor discordancies between stimulated and spontaneous GH secretion. Two of the remaining seven patients had subnormal spontaneous GH secretion. However, spontaneous GH secretion, both individually and as a group, was entirely normal in the remaining five patients who had impaired GH responses to the ITT but normal individual responses to the GHRH + AST; in these five patients, IGF‐I standard deviation scores (SDS; –2·7 to –0·8) were significantly reduced to a moderate degree compared with normals. Conclusions In cranially irradiated adult cancer survivors, it cannot be assumed that failure to pass the ITT in isolation reflects severe GH deficiency (GHD). It appears that in some patients near‐maximal compensatory overdrive of the partially damaged somatotroph axis may result in near‐normal quantitative restoration of spontaneous GH secretion, thus limiting further stimulation with the ITT to the extent that impaired GH responses can be seen even before spontaneous GH secretion starts to decline in adults. However, IGF‐I status continues to provide useful information about the adequacy of the compensatory process and therefore the degree of normality of GH secretion.     

Deterioration of growth hormone (GH) response and anterior pituitary function in young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency and ectopic posterior pituitary: a two-year prospective follow-up study

CONTEXT: The current criteria for definition of partial GHD in young adults are still a subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to reinvestigate anterior pituitary function in young adults with congenital childhood-onset GHD associated with structural hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities and normal GH response at the time of first reassessment of GH secretion. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a prospective explorative study conducted in a university research hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen subjects with a mean age of 17.2 +/- 0.7 yr and a peak GH after insulin tolerance test (ITT) higher than 5 microg/liter were recruited from a cohort of 42 patients with childhood-onset GHD and ectopic posterior pituitary at magnetic resonance imaging. GH secretion after ITT and GHRH plus arginine, IGF-I concentration, and body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, total cholesterol, and fibrinogen were evaluated at baseline and at 2-yr follow-up. RESULTS: At mean age of 19.2 +/- 0.7 yr, the mean peak GH response decreased significantly after ITT (P = 0.00001) and GHRH plus arginine (P = 0.0001). GH peak values after ITT and GHRH plus arginine were less than 5 and 9 microg/liter in 10 and eight patients, respectively. Additional pituitary defects were documented in eight patients. Significant changes were found in the values of IGF-I sd score (P = 0.0026), waist circumference (P = 0.00001), serum total cholesterol (P = 0.00001), and serum fibrinogen (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study underline the importance of further reassessment of pituitary function in young adults with GHD of childhood-onset and poststimulation GH responses suggestive of partial GHD.     

GH response to hypoglycemia and clonidine in the GH-releasing hormone resistance syndrome

GH secretion by the pituitary is the result of the balance between the stimulatory effect of GHRH and the inhibitory effect of SS. Patients with mutations in GHRH receptor (GHRH-R) gene (GHRH-R) offer a unique model to study the mechanism of action of different GH secretion stimuli. In the past, we have demonstrated a small but significant GH response to a GH secretagogue (GHRP-2) in a homogenous cohort of patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD) due to a homozygous null mutation in GHRH-R (IVS1+1G-->A). Now, we sought to determine if we could detect a GH response to hypoglycemia (ITT: insulin tolerance test) or clonidine (CL) in these patients. Nine young GHD subjects underwent both ITT and CL tests, and 2 additional subjects underwent only CL test. There was a small but significant GH increase during ITT, but not during CL test. These results indicate that a minimal albeit significant GH response to ITT can occur despite complete lack of GHRH-R function.     

The impact of cranial irradiation on GH responsiveness to GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6

Patients treated with cranial radiation are at risk of GH deficiency (GHD). We evaluated somatotroph responsiveness to maximal provocative tests exploring the GH releasable pool in relation to the impact of radiation damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary unit. The GH-releasing effect of GHRH plus GH secretagogue [GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6] (GHRH+GHRP-6) was studied in 22 adult patients (age, 23.2 +/- 1.4 yr; 8 female and 14 male; mean body mass index, 22.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m(2)) who received cranial radiation for primary brain tumor distant from hypothalamic-pituitary region 7.6 +/- 0.7 yr before GH testing. Two stimulatory tests for GH secretion were employed: insulin tolerance test (ITT, 0.15 IU/kg regular insulin i.v. bolus); and GHRH+GHRP-6 test: GHRH (Geref Serono, Madrid, Spain; l microg/kg) plus GHRP-6 (CLINALFA, Laufelingen, Switzerland; 1 microg/kg) as i.v. bolus. Serum GH was measured (Delphia; Perkin Elmer, Wallac, Turku, Finland) at -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min. Anterior pituitary function was normal in all except in 1 female with hyperprolactinemia. Twelve out of 22 irradiated patients were GH-deficient (GHD) with both tests. Eleven out of 22 (50%) irradiated patients were severely GHD, according to the ITT (GH < 3 microg/liter; mean GH peak, 1.5 +/- 0.5 microg/liter). In 9 irradiated patients, in whom ITT was performed as well, mean peak GH after the GHRH+GHRP-6 test was 6.2 +/- 0.8 microg/liter, which is considered as severe GHD, according to our own cut-off for the test (peak GH < 10 microg/liter). GH responses to both tests were highly concordant, but the differential in the GH peak concentrations between GHD and non-GHD irradiated patients was significantly larger for the GHRH+GHRP-6 test than that for the ITT. The 2 discordant responses, i.e. poor response to the ITT and good response to the GHRH+GHRP-6 test, were found in 1 hyperprolactinemic female patient and in 1 other female. One irradiated patient was diagnosed as GHD only with the combined test, because ITT was contraindicated because of epilepsy. PRL and cortisol responses to ITT were normal in all irradiated patients and did not depend on the GH status. IGF-I levels were not informative or discriminative between the GHD and non-GHD irradiated adult patients. In conclusion, the use of GH secretagogues plus GHRH is an easy, reliable and accurate way of assessing GH secretion in cranially irradiated patients. Impairment of the GH releasable pool in the irradiated patients, with a maximal provocative test, reflects alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary unit caused by radiotherapy.     

Acromegaly due to ectopic growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) production: dynamic studies of GH and ectopic GHRH secretion

Dynamic studies of GH and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) secretion were performed in a man with a GHRH-producing carcinoid tumor and acromegaly. Insulin hypoglycemia stimulated and metoclopramide inhibited both GH and GHRH acutely. Bromocriptine suppressed GH both acutely and chronically without altering circulating GHRH levels and also blunted the GH response to exogenous GHRH. TRH acutely stimulated GH, but not GHRH, secretion, and iv bolus doses of synthetic GHRH-(1-40) stimulated GH release acutely. Somatostatin infusion decreased both GH and GHRH concentrations and blunted the GH responses to TRH and GHRH-(1-40). We conclude that prolonged exposure of the pituitary gland to high concentrations of GHRH is associated with chronic GH hypersecretion and may be accompanied by a preserved acute GH response to exogenous GHRH; a paradoxical response of GH to TRH may be mediated at the pituitary level, consequent to prolonged pituitary exposure to GHRH; bromocriptine suppression of GH in acromegaly is due to a direct pituitary effect of the drug; and somatostatin inhibits both ectopic GHRH secretion as well as GH responsiveness to GHRH in vivo. Since GH secretory responses in patients with somatotroph adenomas are similar to those in this patient, augmented GHRH secretion may play a role in development of the "classic" form of acromegaly.     

POSTOPERATIVE PLASMA GH LEVELS AND RESTORATION OF GH DYNAMICS IN ACROMEGALIC PATIENTS SURGICALLY TREATED BY THE TRANSSPHENOIDAL APPROACH

In 44 patients with acromegaly treated by transsphenoidal pituitary microsurgery, the relationship between changes in pre- and post-operative GH dynamics and postoperative fasting plasma GH levels was examined to clarify which is the optimal approach for evaluating postoperative removal of the tumour. TRH, LHRH and bromocriptine tests, which act directly on the pituitary somatotroph, and the oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT), which act via hypothalamus, were carried out pre- and post-operatively. Abnormal responses postoperatively were found in most patients with fasting postoperative plasma GH over 5 ng/ml. In 24 patients with postoperative fasting plasma GH level of 5 ng/ml or below, 7 of 17 (41%) showed abnormal responses in the TRH test, 2 of 5 (40%) in the LHRH test and 3 of 13 (23%) patients in the bromocriptine test. All patients with a fasting plasma GH level less than 10 ng/ml, except for those with panhypopituitarism, showed normal responses to ITT and the paradoxical increases with the oGTT were absent. These results indicate that abnormal responses caused by a direct action on adenoma cells do not necessarily disappear even when the fasting plasma GH level is below 5 ng/ml. Abnormal responses caused by indirect actions, through the hypothalamus, disappear when the level is less than 10 ng/ml.     

Diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency: still a matter of debate

The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is established by laboratory testing in patients with an appropriate clinical history of hypothalamic pituitary disease. As the measurement of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels as well as the spontaneous GH secretion are not considered reliable parameters, the diagnosis of GHD in adults may be established by GH provocative tests, provided that a reproducible test with clear normative limits is available. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is a reliable diagnostic test in adults, but is contraindicated in several clinical conditions which are often observed in adult patients with suspected GHD. The other classic GH provocative tests, except the glucagon test, have a poor diagnostic utility and should be abandoned. GHRH combined with arginine or GH secretagogues represent a potent, safe, reproducible and reliable test which should be preferable to the ITT as a first-choice diagnostic test for GHD.     

The diagnosis of partial growth hormone deficiency in adults with a putative insult to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis

CONTEXT: Similar to patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD), those with a more moderate impairment of GH secretion [GH insufficiency (GHI)] have abnormal body composition, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance. Given the inherent problems in the diagnosis of severe GHD, the situation is likely to be even more difficult in individuals with GHI. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the utility of GH stimulation tests and GH-dependent proteins in the diagnosis of GHI. DESIGN: The study was a cross-sectional, case-controlled study. PATIENTS: The study included 31 patients with GHD, 23 with GHI [peak GH 3-7 microg/liter (9-21 mU/liter)], and 30 age- and sex-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and biochemical markers of GH status were measured. RESULTS: Nineteen of the patients with GHI (83%) had no additional anterior pituitary hormone deficits. Ten GHI patients showed discordant GH status based on the two GH stimulation tests performed. GH status was defined by the highest peak GH value achieved; in four this was to the insulin tolerance test (ITT), four the arginine test, and two the GHRH-arginine test. In five of the six patients in whom GH status was not defined by the ITT, peak GH levels to the ITT were in the range 2.4-2.9 microg/liter. IGF-I values for the GHI adults were significantly lower than the control subjects (121 +/- 48 vs. 162 +/- 75 microg/liter; P < 0.05); however, only six (26%) had values below the 10th percentile of levels seen in the control group. IGF binding protein-3 and acid labile subunit levels of the GHI adults were not significantly different from the controls. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of GHI in an individual is extremely difficult because the patients rarely exhibit additional pituitary hormone deficits, and levels of GH-dependent proteins are normal in the majority. Diagnosis relies heavily on GH stimulation tests and requires two tests in all patients to define GHI; obesity when present is potentially a major confounder.     

Ghrelin test for the assessment of GH status in successfully treated patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: Posttreatment assessment of disease activity and definition of cure of acromegaly, using measurement of GH secretion, remains problematic. Furthermore, with our efforts to achieve tight biochemical control of the disease it is foreseeable that a proportion of patients may be rendered GH deficient, thus requiring testing for GH deficiency. The aim of our study was to evaluate residual GH secretion in cured patients with acromegaly. DESIGN AND METHODS: At baseline, circulating GH, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, leptin and lipid (cholesterol and tri-glycerides) levels were measured in 33 acromegalic patients nine years after treatment with surgery of whom 6 were additionally irradiated. Two tests were performed: the GH suppression test--oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the GH provocation test--ghrelin test (1 microg/kg i.v. bolus) and the results were compared with 11 age- and sex-matched control subjects. RESULTS: According to the consensus criteria (normal IGF-I levels and post-OGTT GH nadir <1 microg/l), 21 treated acromegalic patients were cured, 6 had discordant IGF-I and GH nadir values during OGTT, while 6 had persistent acromegaly. After the GH provocative test with ghrelin (cut-off for severe GH deficiency is GH <3 microg/l), we detected 9 severely GH deficient patients (GHD) among 21 cured acromegalic patients. Mean GH peak (+/-s.e.m.) response to the ghrelin test in GHD acromegalics was significantly lower compared with acromegalics with sufficient GH secretory capacity and control subjects (1.2 +/- 0.2 microg/l vs 20.1 +/- 2.4 microg/l vs 31.1 +/- 2.5 microg/l respectively, P<0.0001). Mean IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels were not different between GHD and GH-sufficient cured acromegalics. Leptin levels and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in GHD male acromegalics compared with GH-sufficient male acromegalics. GHD female acromegalics tended to have higher BMIs while leptin levels were not different. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of residual GH secretory capacity by the GH provocation test is necessary in the long-term follow-up of successfully treated acromegalics since a large proportion of these patients are rendered GH deficient.     

Glucagon stimulation test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults

The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is considered the test of choice for the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD). However, in patients with contraindications to ITT, alternative provocative tests must be used with appropriate cut-offs. The glucagon stimulation test has proved to be a safe, low-cost and effective means of stimulating GH secretion, and therefore can be considered as a suitable alternative to the ITT. We have studied the GH response to the glucagon test in 33 patients with known pituitary disease, 12 males and 21 females, aged between 21 and 60 yr (41.18 +/- 9.47 yr); 5 had isolated GHD and 28 had panhypopituitarism. We also evaluated a control group of 25 individuals, matched for age and sex (8 males and 17 females), aged between 20 and 60 yr (39.28 +/- 12.10 yr). They were selected via the ITT if their peak GH response was > 5.0 ng/ml. GH peak after glucagon was significantly lower in the group of patients compared to the control group (0.49 +/- 0.85 vs 8.69 +/- 5.85 ng/ml, p = 0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plot analyses of the control and GHD group showed an area under the curve of 0.982 for GH peak response to glucagon. The response value of 3.0 ng/ml showed the best pair of sensitivity (97%)/specificity (88%), and was chosen as the cut-off defining GHD. After evaluation of positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) through simulation of different prevalences of the disease, we concluded that the cut-off point of 3.00 ng/ml maximizes both PPV and NPV (100%). In conclusion, we have shown that the glucagon stimulation test has a good performance and great diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of GHD.     

Effect of acute pharmacological modulation of plasma free fatty acids on GH secretion in acromegalic patients

OBJECTIVES: In acromegaly GH secretion is markedly increased due in most cases to a GH secreting pituitary adenoma. GH secretion is modulated by variations in the levels of free fatty acids (FFA). Recent studies in different clinical situations, have shown that reduction in FFA with acipimox (A) modifies somatotroph cell responsiveness. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute pharmacological reduction of plasma FFA on both basal GH levels and GHRH-mediated GH secretion in acromegalic patients. PATIENTS: Six acromegalic patients (four female, two male) aged 57 +/- 4 years., with active disease due to pituitary adenomas were studied. Four of the patients had been treated previously by surgery and/or radiotherapy. The diagnosis of active acromegaly was established by clinical assessment, increased serum IGF-I and impaired GH suppression after oral glucose. MEASUREMENTS: Four tests were performed: placebo, A (250 mg, orally, - 210 minutes and - 60 minutes), GHRH (100 microg, iv, 0 minutes) and GHRH plus A. The different tests on each subject were performed in random order one week apart, each subject served as their own control. Serum GH was measured by RIA at appropriate intervals. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal METHOD: Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon test. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The administration of A induced a FFA reduction during the entire test both when administered with placebo and with GHRH: AUC (mmol/l x 90 minutes): placebo plus placebo: 88.2 +/- 7.3. Placebo plus A: 23.2 +/- 4.6 (P < 0.05). Placebo plus GHRH: 85.4 +/- 6.9. A plus GHRH: 21.8 +/- 3.8 (P < 0.05). Mean peak GH level (microg/l) after placebo plus placebo was 5.0 +/- 1.8 not significantly different than after placebo plus A with a mean peak of 6.2 +/- 2 (P = ns). Mean peak GHRH-induced GH secretion was 26.0 +/- 15.4 and was not modified by previous A administration with mean peak of 24.4 +/- 11.8 (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients acute pharmacological reduction of FFA with acipimox did not modify basal GH levels or GHRH-induced GH secretion, suggesting that the adenomatous somatotroph cell is unresponsive to physiological signals such as FFA which act at a pituitary level. These data support the hypothesis of an intrinsic neoplastic pituitary defect for the pathogenesis of acromegaly.     

Development of growth hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiencies in patients with prenatal or perinatal-onset hypothalamic hypopituitarism having invisible or thin pituitary stalk on magnetic resonance imaging

A gradual loss of anterior pituitary hormones is suspected in patients treated with irradiation due to brain tumors. Development of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) with age has been documented in patients with idiopathic GHD. A gradual loss of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion has been also shown in a patient with severe GHD and an invisible pituitary stalk on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this longitudinal and cross-sectional study was to evaluate the gradual loss of growth hormone (GH) and ACTH in a homogeneous group of patients with hypopituitarism. Twenty-eight patients (23 males, 5 females) from four hospitals were diagnosed as having prenatal or perinatal-onset hypothalamic hypopituitarism. They had an abnormal pituitary stalk on MRI (invisible in 18 patients, thin in 10 patients) without any other organic disease of the brain. Each patient had GHD upon initial evaluation. Height (n=20) was analyzed as standard deviation score (SDS). Longitudinal (n=8) and cross-sectional (n=28) GH secretion capacity was evaluated by GH peaks, in response to insulin tolerance test (ITT) and growth hormone releasing factor test (GRF test). Longitudinal (n=10) and cross-sectional (n=28) ACTH secretion capacity was evaluated by cortisol peaks in response to ITT. Height SDS decreased each year in all the untreated patients after birth. GH peaks decreased gradually with age. Longitudinal data showed decreased GH peaks with age in seven out of eight patients using ITT and in all four patients using GRF tests. Cortisol peaks also decreased gradually together with signs and symptoms for adrenal deficiency such as general fatigue. Cortisol peaks of less than 414 nmol/L (15 microg/dl) in response to ITT were seen in 24% of the tests before age 10 and 56% before age 25. In conclusion, GHD and ACTH deficiency developed gradually in patients with prenatal or perinatal-onset hypothalamic hypopituitarism who had invisible or thin pituitary stalks examined by MRI.     

Adenylate cyclase of GH and ACTH producing tumors of human: activation by non-specific hormones and other bioactive substances.

The adenylate cyclase responses of the human GH or ACTH producing pituitary adenomas and ectopic ACTH producing tumors to TRH, LH-RH, biogenic amines, peptides hormones, PGE1 and rat median eminence extract (MEE) have been examined. Out of 4 GH producing pituitary adenomas obtained from patients with active acromegaly at hypophysectomy two were stimulated by TRH, two by LH-RH, three by norepinephrine, one by dopamine, four by PGE1 and none by serotonin. Glucagon stimulated the adenylate cyclase in one of three and MEE in both of two tested. The positive responses of paradoxical GH release after TRH and/or LH-RH before surgery in these patients coincidentally related to the response of adenylate cyclase of each pituitary adenoma. There seems, however, to be no consistent correlation between the adenylate cyclase responses to biogenic amines and the GH release after L-Dopa or 5-hydroxytroptophan tested. The adenylate cyclase of a pituitary adenoma from case of Cushing's disease was stimulated by LH-RH, norepinephrine glucagon and MEE but not by TRH. Plasma levels of ACTH, beta-MSH and cortisol increased after LH-RH but not after TRH in this patient before hypophysectomy. The adenylate cyclase of two ectopic ACTH producing tumors (gastric carcinoid and malignant thymoma) was activated by TRH, LH-RH, norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin, PGE1 and MEE. These results indicate the presence of multiple hormone receptors in GH or ACTH producing pituitary adenomas and ectopic ACTH producing tumors, and suggest that the paradoxical GH or ACTH release after TRH and/or LH-RH injection in acromegaly and Cushing's syndrome might be caused by an alteration of the cellular membrane receptors of the pituitary adenomas.     

Occurrence of GH deficiency in adult patients who underwent neurosurgery in the hypothalamus-pituitary area for non-functioning tumour masses.

Hypothalamus-pituitary tumours and their treatments (neurosurgery and/or radiotherapy) are major causes of acquired hypopituitarism. Scientific and clinical evidences show the positive effect of GH replacement therapy in severe adult GH deficiency (GHD) pointed toward the need of diagnostic screening of conditions at high risk for GHD. We screened 152 adults (82 males, 70 females; age: 52.3+/-1.2 years, age-range: 20-80 years, BMI: 26.4+/-0.8 kg/m(2)) in order to disclose the presence of GHD after neurosurgery for hypothalamus-pituitary tumours. The whole group (studied at least 3 months after neurosurgery) included: 111 non-functioning pituitary adenomas and 41 peri-pituitary tumours (24 craniopharyngiomas, 7 meningiomas, 5 cysts, 2 chondrosarcomas, 1 colesteatoma, 1 germinoma and 1 hemangiopericitoma). In 14 patients who underwent both neurosurgery and radiotherapy due to a tumour remnant, the somatotroph function was evaluated again 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. GHD was assumed to be shown by GH peak <5 microg/L (severe <3 microg/L) after Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT) or <16.5 microg/L (severe <9 microg/L) after GH-releasing hormone+arginine test (GHRH+ARG) (3rd and 1st centile limits of normality, respectively), two widely accepted provocative tests. Before neurosurgery GHD was present in 97/152 (63.8%) and resulted severe in 66/152 (43.4%) patients. After neurosurgery GHD was present in 122/152 (80.2%) and severe in 106/152 (69.7%). While 26 patients developed severe GHD (GHD) as consequence of neurosurgery, only one patient who had been classified as GHD before neurosurgery showed normal GH response after surgery. After neurosurgery, 91.0% (81/89) of the pan-hypopituitaric patients showed severe GHD. Considering the 14 patients who underwent also radiotherapy after neurosurgery, 7/14 had GHD before neurosurgery while 12/14 became severe GHD after radiotherapy in a context of pan-hypopituitarism. IGF-I levels below the 3rd age-related normal limits were present in 39.0% of patients in whom severe GHD was showed by provocative tests. In conclusion, this study shows that the occurrence of acquired severe GHD is extremely common in adult patients bearing non-functioning tumour masses in the hypothalamus-pituitary area and further increases after neurosurgery. All patients bearing non-functioning hypothalamus-pituitary tumours should undergo evaluation of their somatotroph function before and after neurosurgery that represents a condition at obvious more than high risk for hypopituitarism.     

Diagnosis of adult GH deficiency

Based on previous consensus statements, it has been widely accepted that the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) must be shown biochemically by provocative tests of GH secretion; in fact, the measurement of IGF-I as well as of other markers was considered unable to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. The Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT) was indicated as that of choice and severe GHD defined by a GH peak lower than 3 μg/l. It is now recognized that, although normal IGF-I levels do not rule out severe GHD, very low IGF-I levels in patients highly suspected for GHD (i.e. patients with childhood-onset severe GHD or with multiple hypopituitarism acquired in adulthood) can be considered as definite evidence for severe GHD. However, patients suspected for adult GHD with normal IGF-I levels must be investigated by provocative tests. ITT remains a test of reference but it should be recognized that other tests are as reliable as ITT. Glucagon as classical test and, particularly, new maximal tests such as GHRH in combination with arginine or GH secretagogues (GHS) (i.e. GHRP-6) have well defined cut-off limits, are reproducible, able to distinguish between normal and GHD subjects. Overweight and obesity have confounding effect on the interpretation of the GH response to provocative tests. In adults cut-off levels of GH response below which severe GHD is demonstrated must be appropriate to lean, overweight and obese subjects to avoid false positive diagnosis in obese adults and false negative diagnosis in lean GHD patients.