Clinical analysis of community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical features, etiology, and outcome of patients over 65 years old hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. PATIENTS: Eighty-four patients (50 males, 34 females) hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia in Kawasaki Medical School Kawasaki Hospital between April 1998 and March 2000. RESULTS: Most of the patients had respiratory symptoms or signs, but over one-third also had atypical symptoms of pneumonia such as dyspnea, consciousness disturbance, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The causative microorganisms were identified in 48% of these patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae (13%), respiratory viruses (13%), Haemophilus influenzae (8%) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (8%) were frequently identified, but Mycoplasma pneumoniae was less frequently noted in the elderly. Double infection was recognized in 19 % and a combination of some virus and bacteria in 13%. Treatment consisted of the administration of second or third generation cephalosporin antibiotics intravenously, because antibiotics had already been preadministered in 39%. The prognosis was poor (mortality rate 9%) for the elderly with community-acquired pneumonia despite mechanical ventilation in 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the range of microorganisms causing community-acquired pneumonia differed slightly from that in previous reports; namely, lower frequency of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila, it is suggested that the initial antibiotic treatment should always cover S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. In addition, since a prevalence of virus infections related to the increase in community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly was found in this study, the routine use of influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccines in the elderly is recommended to reduce the high mortality rate.     

Clinical analysis of pneumonia in the elderly in a community hospital--comparison of community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia]

We experienced 530 elderly cases with pneumonia among 930 patients with pneumonia in Kawasaki Medical School Kawasaki Hospital between April 1986 and September 1998. Clinical analysis of all these patients and a comparison of one group consisting of 418 patients with community-acquired pneumonia and another group composed of 112 patients with nosocomial pneumonia were performed. In all of the elderly patients with pneumonia, respiratory symptoms and inflammatory findings were less frequent, but were frequent for those in poor general and nutritional condition. The causative microorganism was isolated in 42% of these patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae, MSSA and Klebsiella pneumoniae were frequently isolated from the sputum of the patients with community-acquired pneumonia, while Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were frequently isolated from that of nosocomial pneumonia patients. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and some viruses were less frequent for patients in both groups. Although many intravenous antibiotics, such as cephem or carbapenem were administered to patients in both groups, the prognosis was relatively good for those with community acquired pneumonia but was extremely poor for those with nosocomial pneumonia despite mechanical ventilation or steroid pulse therapy for many patients.     

Clinical analysis of community-acquired pneumonia and pulmonary tuberculosis in the elderly and advances in treatment]

We treated 510 elderly case (over 65 years old) among 1,017 patients with community-acquired pneumonia and 60 similar cases among 112 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Kawasaki Medical School Kawasaki Hospital during approximately the past 15 years. These were compared with non-elderly cases (below 65 years old). In the elderly cases with community-acquired pneumonia, atypical clinical symptoms or physical signs were frequent and the mortality rate was high because of severe underlying diseases, and poor general and nutritional conditions. Regarding a prospective study of 84 elderly cases with community-acquired pneumonia during the past two years, S. pneumoniae, Respiratory virus, Gram-negative bacilli, H. influenzae, M. Tuberculosis were frequently isolated. In addition, mixed viral and bacterial infections, which were frequently noted during the winter, were significantly related to the increased frequency of community-acquired pneumonia. In treating elderly cases with community-acquired pneumonia, immunization therapy (e.g., influenza vaccine), second cephalosporin and/or macrolide antimicrobial agents for outpatients with mild pneumonia, and carbapenem and/or macrolide antimicrobial agents for hospitalized patients with moderate or severe pneumonia were most effective. The number of elderly cases with pulmonary tuberculosis has recently increased and the recognition of 10 cases was delayed because of a low percentage of positive smears, but no resistance to antituberculosis drugs have been observed. Regarding the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis, fluoroquinolone and rifamycin derivative antibiotics have been developed as antituberculosis drugs with strong antituberculous activity. However, due to the high percentage of adverse effects in elderly patients, careful treatment with desensitization therapy for antituberculosis drugs is considered important.     

Clinical analysis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia caused by a mixed infection of polymicrobial agents--including a comparative study of an infectious group with monomicrobial agents and an infectious group with unknown agents

We clinically analyzed 83 patients with community-acquired pneumonia caused by a mixed infection of polymicrobial agents who we have treated during the past 15 years. A comparative study among three groups; an infectious group with polymicrobial agents (83 cases), an infectious group with monomicrobial agents (335 cases), and an infectious group with unknown agents (599 cases) was performed. The results were as follows; (1) The highest percentage of patients were elderly and bedridden. (2) Striking atypical pneumonic symptoms, including dyspnea, consciousness disturbance, gastrointestinal symptoms and hypotension (shock) were present. (3) Laboratory findings of poor nutritional conditions, including decreases in serum protein, albumin, and cholineesterase, and hypoxia remarkably increased. (4) The prognosis was poor because the mortality rate (15.7%) was higher. (5) There were two polymicrobial agents for 75 patients and three agents for 8 patients. The coupling of polymicrobial agents was most frequent in five patients with Haemophilus influenzae + MSSA and five with H. influenzae + respiratory virus. These results suggest that the patients with community-acquired pneumonia caused by a mixed infection of polymicrobial agents had clinical features and causative microorganisms resembling those of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia. We recommended that treatment with antibiotics for them was adequate if the treatment resemble that of elderly patients.     

Clinical analysis of patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization classified by age group

We classified 1017 patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization experienced in Kawasaki Medical School Kawasaki Hospital during the past 15 years into five age groups (< or = 54 years old, 55-64 years old, 65-74 years old, 75-84 years old, > or = 85 years old). With particular emphasis on the elderly patients, we then compared the clinical and microbiological findings in the five groups. The results were as follows; (1) Half of patients in the over 85 years old group were bed-ridden. (2) The proportion receiving antibiotics before hospitalization decreased with age. (3) There were striking atypical pneumonic symptoms, such as dyspnea and consciousness disturbance in the two age groups over 75 years old. (4) Hypotension (shock) increased with age. (5) Markers of nutritional conditions, such as serum protein, albumin, cholinesterase, and hypoxia remarkably increased in the two age groups over 75 years old. (6) There were no significant differences in the isolation rate of etiological microorganisms. (7) The number of polymicrobial agents in the < or = 54 years old group was lower than that in the other age groups. (8) Mycoplasma pneumoniae was most significantly higher in < or = 54 years old group, Haemophilus influenzae in patients 55-64 years old, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in both 65-74 and 75-84 years old groups. (9) The isolation rate of MSSA, gram-negative bacilli such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respiratory viruses increased with age. (10) The amount of sepsis increased with age. (11) The prognosis was poor in the two groups over 75 years old because the mortality rate (over 10%) was higher that for the other age groups.     

2002～2003年中国社区呼吸道感染常见病原菌的耐药性监测

目的　调查 2 0 0 2～ 2 0 0 3年中国社区呼吸道感染常见病原菌的耐药性。方法　收集2 0 0 2年 4月～ 2 0 0 3年 4月全国 5个地区 5家医院社区呼吸道感染患者中分离的 779株肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌、卡它莫拉菌、A群 β溶血链球菌及苯唑西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌 (MSSA) ;同时收集北京市两家幼儿园儿童鼻咽携带的 185株肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌及卡它莫拉菌。琼脂稀释法测定头孢丙烯等 10种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度 (MICs)。结果　全国 5个地区 ,青霉素中介的肺炎链球菌(PISP)为 2 3 9% ,青霉素耐药 (PRSP)为 2 2 7%。PISP发生率从高至低依次为杭州 (4 4 1% )、武汉(2 6 2 % )、沈阳 (2 1 5 % )、上海 (2 0 8% )、北京 (18 5 % )、北京幼儿园 (12 7% ) ;而PRSP的排序则为北京幼儿园 (34 9% )、上海 (31 9% )、武汉 (2 7 9% )、杭州 (2 2 1% )、沈阳 (13 8% )、北京 (8 6 % )。肺炎链球菌对左氧氟沙星的敏感率为 96 3%。 9 5 %的流感嗜血杆菌和 87 4 %的卡它莫拉菌产生 β内酰胺酶 ,这两种菌对阿莫西林 /克拉维酸、头孢克洛、头孢丙烯、头孢呋辛、头孢曲松、阿奇霉素、左氧氟沙星的敏感率在 96 4 %～ 10 0 %之间。肺炎链球菌、A群 β溶血链球菌、MSSA对阿奇霉素耐药率高于 6 0 %。头孢丙烯对PISP     

Incidence and clinical features of community-acquired legionellosis in hospitalized patients

In a two-year prospective study of patients hospitalized because of community-acquired pneumonia, the incidence of legionellosis was found to be 3.8% (17/442 cases). After S. pneumoniae, M. pneumoniae and influenzae viruses, legionellae were the fourth most frequently identified pneumonia agents. We evaluated the clinical data from 41 cases with legionellosis, 17 diagnosed in this prospective study and 24 prior to the study. The age range of all patients (22 women, 19 men) was 24-78 yrs (median 61.3 yrs), 14 of 41 cases (34.1%) had extrapulmonary organ involvement. Twelve patients (29.3%) died. The fatality rate was 4.5% (1/22 cases) in patients treated with erythromycin, and 57.9% (11/19 cases) in patients treated with other antibiotics. Antibiotics effective in legionellosis should be added to the routine therapy of community-acquired pneumonia when this aetiology can not be excluded.     

Clinical differentiation of atypical pneumonia using Japanese guidelines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atypical pneumonia occupies an important position in community-acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study was to examine whether making a diagnosis of atypical pneumonia is possible based upon the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines. METHODS: The data from three prospective studies were reviewed. A total of 285 patients with mycoplasmal pneumonia or chlamydial pneumonia and 515 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia or Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia were assessed to determine whether these pneumonias met the diagnostic criteria for atypical pneumonia used in the Japanese Respiratory Society guidelines. The criteria were: (i) age less than 60 years; (ii) no or only minor underlying diseases; (iii) persistent cough; (iv) limited chest auscultatory findings; (v) no sputum, or no identified aetiological agent by rapid diagnosis; and (vi) a peripheral white blood cell count below 10,000/microL. RESULTS: All items of the criteria proved to be valid except for 'age' in patients with Chlamydophila pneumoniae pneumonia using multiple regression analysis. The sensitivity and specificity for atypical pneumonia were 77.0% and 93.0% based on four or more of the criteria respectively. CONCLUSION: Pure atypical pneumonia can be differentiated to some degree by clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. It is important to differentiate and treat bacterial pneumonia and atypical pneumonia in regions such as Japan, where Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance to macrolides is high. Treatment covering the two types of pneumonia should be considered in elderly patients and those with underlying respiratory disease.     

Is it possible to distinguish between atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia?: evaluation of the guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in Japan

The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) published the guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in 2000. The guidelines set up nine parameters and criteria for the differential diagnosis of atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia based on clinical symptoms, physical signs and laboratory data. To evaluate the performance of these guideline criteria, 91 cases of Chlamydia pneumoniae (53 cases were pure-C. pneumoniae and 38 cases were mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia), 103 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (86 cases were pure-M. pneumoniae and 17 cases were mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia) and 144 cases of bacterial (Streptococcus pneumoniae and/or Haemophilus influenzae) pneumonia were analyzed. The accordance rate for a suspected atypical pneumonia with the guideline criteria was 84.8% for pure-M. pneumoniae pneumonia and 60.3% for pure-C. pneumoniae pneumonia, but only 9.0% for bacterial pneumonia, 12.1% for mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia and 16.6% for mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of the criteria in the JRS guidelines were 75.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Our results indicated that the differentiation of pneumonia in the JRS guidelines is useful for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae pneumonia, but difficult to apply to the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae pneumonia.     

Comparison of community-acquired pneumonia in relation to influenza A and RS virus infections

We experienced 142 cases with community-acquired pneumonia between April 1998 and March 2000. By measuring the titers of respiratory viruses for these cases, we were able to identify acute phase infections of influenza A virus in 10 cases and RS virus in 6 cases and determined that there was an increase in community-acquired pneumonia during both winter seasons. Thereafter we compared the clinical features of community-acquired pneumonia with regard to these two types of virus infection by dividing the patients into two groups, both of which frequently included in the elderly. In the influenza virus group, such general symptoms as high fever, headache and general fatigue were dominant. Common bacteria were isolated in nine cases with mixed infection; four of them with Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the RS virus group, there were fewer general symptoms and common bacteria were isolated in four cases with mixed infection; three with Haemophilus influenzae. The severity of the illness was greater in the Influenza virus group; i.e.) three cases required mechanical ventilation and two of these three cases died. In the RS virus group, on the other hand, the prognosis was good because no mechanical ventilation was required and there were no deaths. Influenza vaccination is especially important for the elderly, because the epidemiology of the influenza virus groups showed none had a history of influenza vaccination in this study.     

Pneumonia in the elderly (geriatric) population

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review of recent studies (2003 and 2004) concerning pneumonia in the very old. RECENT FINDINGS: Hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the elderly is associated with a high mortality and with a high rate of readmission within the following year. Functional status, altered mental status, number of comorbidities, aspiration pneumonia, renal failure, and nutritional status are all indicators of adverse prognosis. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Enterobacteriacae, and Staphylococcus aureus are the most frequently identified causative microorganisms, viruses account for up to 26% of hospital admissions for CAP. Chlamydia pneumoniae is also implicated in CAP and in nursing-home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP), with recent reports of outbreaks in nursing homes. Aspiration pneumonia is frequent in the elderly and occurs with increased frequency in patients with nasogastric tubes or percutaneous enterogastric tubes. In severe aspiration pneumonia, 20% of organisms implicated are anaerobic and 80% aerobic, most of which are gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae. Poor oral hygiene increases subsequent risk of pneumonia: dental plaque may act as a reservoir for pathogenic organisms implicated in CAP or NHAP. Prevention of CAP and NHAP relies on the combined use of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, which decreases hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality for CAP. SUMMARY: Recent studies stress the importance of aspiration as a frequent mechanism of CAP, provide new insights as to causative organisms in this setting, and underline the contribution of combined vaccination in reducing morbidity and mortality.     

Etiologies and treatment outcomes for out-patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen, Thailand

Most patients with community-acquired pneumonia are treated as out-patients with empirical therapy, since initially the etiologic agent is unknown. We prospectively assessed the etiologies and treatment outcomes of pneumonia from February 2003 to 2004 at ambulatory clinics. Forty-four patients were included with a mean age of 49.2 (SD 18.2) years. The male to female ratio was 1:1.4. The incubation period was 6.9 (SD 4.4) days. Half of the patients were healthy. Asthma and COPD were common in patients with underlying diseases. The etiologic diagnosis was determined by a sputum culture and a serology test of paired serum samples. Hemo-culture produced no growth in any patients. Atypical pathogens and H. influenzae were the most common finding, each occurring in 31.8% of the patients followed by S. pneumoniae and H. parainfluenzae (27.3% each). Twenty-two patients were infected with multiple pathogens. C. pneumoniae was the most common co-infecting pathogen. Two of 12 S. pneumoniae isolates were penicillin resistant. Nine of 14 H. influenzae isolates were cotrimoxazole resistant and 8 of 14 were not sensitive to erythromycin. For H. parainfluenzae, 11 of 12 isolates were not sensitive to erythromycin, and 7 of 12 were not sensitive to cotrimoxazole. Oral antibiotics were prescribed as out-patient treatment. Forty patients (90.9%) improved, with symptoms-score improvement averaging 6.4 days. Four patients got worse and needed a change of antibiotics, the symptoms usually worsen within 3-5 days. We conclude that, antibiotics for CAP out-patients should cover atypical pathogens, H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae and H. parainfluenzae. If the clinical symptoms do not respond after 3-5 days of out-patient treatment, resistance or an unusual organism (eg B. pseudomallei) should be considered.     

北京地区成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体流行病学调查

目的　对引起社区获得性肺炎 (CAP)的病原体进行流行病学调查 ,加强对非典型致病原重要性的认识。方法　收集 2 0 0 1年 11月至 2 0 0 2年 6月CAP患者共 10 3例。分别检测患者急性期及恢复期肺炎支原体、嗜肺军团菌、肺炎衣原体血清抗体。应用聚合酶链反应 (PCR)分别扩增肺炎支原体P1黏附蛋白基因及肺炎衣原体 16SrRNA基因。应用酶免疫测定 (EIA)方法检测尿中嗜肺军团菌抗原。取患者急性期痰标本进行细菌培养 ,应用常规方法分离鉴定细菌。结果　 10 3例CAP患者 ,病原体检出率为 48.5%。 2 3例 (2 2 .3 % )检出肺炎支原体 ,3例 (2 .9% )检出嗜肺军团菌 ,2例 (1.9% )检出肺炎衣原体。 12例分离出肺炎链球菌 (11.7% )、9例分离出流感嗜血杆菌 (8.7% )、7例分离出肺炎克雷伯菌 (6.8% )。 6例患者存在混合感染 (5.8% ) ,其中 5例为肺炎支原体混合其他病原体。结论　非典型病原体尤其是肺炎支原体感染在CAP中占据重要地位 ;肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌仍为常见的致病细菌 ;混合感染不容忽视     

Nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia: correlation between cause and severity or comorbidity

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia frequently constitutes a nonsevere infection manageable at home. However, for these low-risk episodes, the epidemiological features have not been carefully analyzed. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cause of nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia and to investigate if a correlation exists between cause and severity or comorbidity. METHODS: During a 3-year period, all patients with nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia, according to the Pneumonia Patient Outcome Research Team prognostic classification (patients in groups 1-3), were included in the study. Causes were investigated through the following procedures: cultures of blood, sputum, and pleural fluid; serologic tests; and polymerase chain reaction methods to detect Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in whole blood or Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in throat swab specimens. RESULTS: Of 317 initially included patients, 247 were eligible for the study. A microbial diagnosis was obtained in 162 patients (66%), and the main pathogens detected were S pneumoniae (69 patients [28%]), M pneumoniae (40 patients [16%]), and C pneumoniae (28 patients [11%]). For the 58 patients in prognostic group 1, M pneumoniae was the most prevalent cause, and atypical microorganisms constituted 40 (69%) of the isolated agents. In contrast, for patients in prognostic groups 2 and 3, S pneumoniae was the leading agent, and a significant reduction of M pneumoniae cases and a greater presence of other more uncommon pathogens were observed. The existence of comorbid conditions was not a determining factor for particular causes. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia, there was a certain correlation between severity and cause. In contrast, the existence of a comorbidity did not have a predictive causative value.     

Community-acquired pneumonia in patients requiring hospitalization

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the microbial aetiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients requiring hospitalization. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study of consecutive non-immunocompromised patients aged 12 years and above admitted with CAP from August 1997 to May 1999 was undertaken. RESULTS: Of 127 patients hospitalized for CAP, an aetiological diagnosis was achieved in 53 cases (41.7%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated pathogen and caused 10.2% of all the cases, followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae (5.5%), Haemophilus influenzae (5.5%), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (3.9%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3.9%). Gram-negative bacilli were significantly more frequently identified in patients aged 60 years or older and in patients with comorbid illnesses. Twelve of 13 patients who died from CAP had other comorbid illnesses compared to 63 of 114 patients who survived (P = 0.014). Three of eight bacteraemic patients died compared with 10 of 119 non-bacteraemic patients (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The microbiology of CAP in patients requiring hospitalization in Malaysia appears to be different from that in Western countries. Gram-negative bacilli were more frequently isolated in older patients and in those with comorbidity. Mortality from CAP is more likely in patients with comorbidity and in those who are bacteraemic.     

不同类型老年吸入性肺炎的病原学、抗生素应用及临床转归

目的 比较老年社区获得性吸入性肺炎(CAP)、医疗相关性吸入性肺炎(HCAP)及医院获得性吸入性肺炎(HAP,包括呼吸机相关性吸入性肺炎)三者病原学、抗生素应用及治疗转归的关系.方法 收集2005年1月一2010年12月北京二炮总医院呼吸科住院的216例老年吸人性肺炎患者病例,分析其病原学结果、抗生素应用的及治疗转归.结果 三种吸入性肺炎的病原学有显著差异,与CAP和HCAP相比,HAP患者G-杆菌的感染比例明显增多(P<0.001);抗生素应用方案有明显差异,CAP组病人未调整抗生素应用比率明显高于HCAP组与HAP组(P<0.001);抗生素应用策略不同,所致死亡率有明显差异,以升阶梯方案为最高,以降阶梯治疗为最低(P=0.03).结论 三种吸入性肺炎在感染病原菌种类、抗生素应用策略及治疗转归上有明显差异,应根据不同类型的老年吸入性肺炎特点合理经验性使用抗菌药物.     

A comparison of moxifloxacin and amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in Latin America: results of a multicenter clinical trial

Since community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disease with a high morbidity rate, it is important to obtain information concerning its etiology and susceptibility to antibiotics across different geographic areas. This study presents data obtained in 5 Latin American counties in the course of an international clinical trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of treatment with either moxifloxacin or amoxicillin administered for 10 days to patients suspected of having CAP caused by a pneumococcal infection. Details are given of the pathogens identified, the patterns of sensitivity to antibiotics observed, and the clinical and microbiological results obtained.A total of 84 patients were studied, of whom 70 (83.3%) were evaluated at the end of the trial to determine the efficacy and safety of the treatment received. Gram-positive bacteria were found in samples from 29 patients (80.5%). The pathogen was Streptococcus pneumoniae in 28 of those cases (77.7%). Gram-negative bacteria were found in 7 patients (19.4%), the most common being Haemophilus influenzae in 3 patients (8.3%). The presence of atypical microorganisms was detected in 18 of the 70 patients (25%), mainly Mycobacterium pneumoniae (n=11), and in 6 cases (8.5%) the infection was mixed. Ten strains of S. pneumoniae (35.7%) were shown to be susceptible to penicillin, 2 (7.1%) were highly resistant, and 16 (57.1%) showed moderate resistance. The clinical success rate at the final visit after treatment was 94.1% for moxifloxacin and 91.7% for amoxicillin. The results of this trial demonstrate a high prevalence of S. pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to penicillin in patients with CAP in Latin America. It also revealed a high incidence of atypical pathogens and mixed infection in 8.6% of patients. This information should be taken into account when establishing protocols for empirical treatment of CAP in Latin America.     

Clinical analysis of nursing home-acquired pneumonia in a community hospital

To clarify the characteristic features of nursing home-acquired pneumonia in our community hospital, we performed a clinical analysis of 86 patients with nursing home-acquired pneumonia. The patients were divided into young and elderly groups. In the young group cerebral palsy was the underlying disease. In the elderly group, it was cerebrovascular attack. Although there were no differences in ADL, the nutritional condition of the young group was comparatively good, the isolated microorganism consisted of mostly Mycoplasma pneumoniae and the prognosis was good. The elderly group where the nutritional condition was poor, the patients were detected by non-respiratory symptoms and risk factors such as obvious episodes of aspiration led us to be concerned about the risk factors for nursing home-acquired pneumonia. The microorganism isolated from the sputum of the elderly group was frequently a multi-drug resistant microorganism such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and polymicrobial infection. Their prognosis was poor despite treatment with multiple antibiotics. In the comparative study between survivors and non-survivors in the elderly group, risk factors such as hypotension, consciousness disturbance, the extension of infiltration shadows, respiratory failure, multiple organ failure and metabolic acidosis were influenced for the prognosis, but the isolated microorganisms and the antimicrobial agents were not concerned.     

Diagnosis of atypical pathogens in patients hospitalized with community-acquired respiratory infection

The object of our study was to determine the proportion of atypical respiratory pathogens among patients hospitalized with a community-acquired respiratory infection. From September 1997 to May 1999, 159 patients (57% male, median age 55, range 1-88 y) admitted to 3 regional hospitals for a community acquired respiratory infection, were enrolled in the study. Microbiological diagnosis for the atypical pathogens Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila was performed with PCR on a throat swab, sputum and/or broncho alveolar lavage (BAL). In addition, Legionella species other than L. pneumophila (L. non-pneumophila species) were detected by PCR. Two serum samples were collected and processed for M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae serology. In total, 27 patients (17%) were diagnosed with an atypical pathogen. Infection with M. pneumoniae was detected in 19 patients (12%) (PCR positive n = 7), with C. pneumoniae in 5 patients (3%) (PCR positive n = 0) and with L. pneumophila in 4 patients (2.5%) (PCR positive n = 4). In 54 (34%) patients routine microbiological investigations revealed aetiological agents other than the 3 atypical pathogens, the most frequently diagnosed pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 18), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 17), Gram-negative rods (n = 13), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 6) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 6). More than 1 pathogen was found in 13 patients. Atypical pathogens were found more often in the young age group (0-18 y), in contrast to bacterial pathogens that were found more often in the older age groups (> or = 65 y). Atypical pathogens were found less often in patients with a clinical presentation of atypical pneumonia. Legionella species other than L. pneumophila were found by PCR in 13 patients (8%), and in 6 patients in combination with another pathogen. An atypical pathogen (M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae or L. pneumophila) was found in 17% of the patients hospitalized with a community acquired respiratory infection, predominantly in the young age group. The role of Legionella non-pneumophila species as pathogen in community acquired respiratory infection needs to be determined. The clinical presentation does not predict the type of pathogen found.     

Comparative study of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila or Chlamydia pneumoniae

The objective of this study was to compare epidemiological data and clinical presentation of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila or Chlamydia pneumoniae. From May 1994 to February 1996, 157 patients with S. pneumoniae (n = 68), L. pneumophila (n = 48) and C. pneumoniae (n = 41) pneumonia with definitive diagnosis, were prospectively studied. The following comparisons showed differences at a level of at least p < 0.05. Patients with S. pneumoniae pneumonia had more frequently underlying diseases (HIV infection and neoplasm) and those with C. pneumoniae pneumonia were older and had a higher frequency of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while L. pneumophila pneumonia prevailed in patients without comorbidity, but with alcohol intake. Presentation with cough and expectoration were significantly more frequent in patients with S. pneumoniae or C. pneumoniae pneumonia, while headache, diarrhoea and no response to betalactam antibiotics prevailed in L. pneumophila pneumonia. However, duration of symptoms > or = 7 d was more frequent in C. pneumoniae pneumonia. Patients with CAP caused by L. pneumophila presented hyponatraemia and an increase in CK more frequently, while AST elevation prevailed in L. pneumophila and C. pneumoniae pneumonia. In conclusion, some risk factors and clinical characteristics of patients with CAP may help to broaden empirical therapy against atypical pathogens until rapid diagnostic tests are available.