Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation

Background

Dislocation is a major complication following total hip arthroplasty, with risk factors such as surgical technique, implant positioning, and implant design. Literature has suggested the distance the femoral head must travel before dislocation to be a predictive factor of dislocation where smaller travel distance has increased dislocation risk. The purpose of this study was to compare 3 designs (hemispherical, metal-on-metal, and dual mobility [DM]) in terms of the dynamic dislocation distance and force required to dislocate.

The Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Femoral Head Size on Hip Range-of-Motion to Impingement

Background

About 50%-70% of dislocators have cups placed within so-called “safe zones.” It has been postulated that factors such as femoral head size and pelvic tilt, obliquity, or rotation may influence postoperative stability. Therefore, we assessed varying degrees of pelvic tilt and head sizes on the range of motion (ROM) to impingement.

A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system

Purpose

Larger-diameter (≥40 mm) femoral heads decrease the incidence of post-operative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study was conducted to discover whether larger-diameter femoral heads result in greater range of motion of the hip with the use of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system.

Methods

Thirty-nine primary THAs were performed via a posterolateral approach using a CT-based navigation system. The stem was inserted in the femur in line with the original femoral neck anteversion. Considering the range of motion during various daily activities which could occur without impingement, the cup anteversion was decided at 10 ° increments according to the stem anteversion. While the cup inclination was set at 40 ° in order to avoid a high inclination angle to prevent the edge roading between the HXLPE liner and ceramic head. After implantation, trial liners and femoral heads were used with either 28 or 40 mm diameter. Maximal hip flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation in extension at 0° and internal rotation angles in flexion at 90 ° were measured. The differences between the ranges of motion with the 40-mm and 28-mm heads were tested. The results were assessed with paired Student t-tests.

Results

The ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation angles improved significantly with the 40-mm heads compared with the 28-mm heads. The ranges of motion of cases where maximal flexion angle was 90° or less were excluded, improved significantly with the 40 mm heads.

Conclusions

We concluded that the larger-diameter 40-mm femoral prosthetic heads result in greater ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation.

     

Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis

BackgroundImpingement is a leading cause for instability resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impingement can be prosthetic, bony, or soft tissue. The purpose of this study is to investigate, using a virtual simulation, whether bony or prosthetic impingement presents first in well-positioned THAs.MethodsTwenty-three patients requiring THA were planned for a ceramic-on-poly cementless construct using dynamic planning software. Cups were orientated at 45° inclination and 25° anteversion when standing. Femoral components and neck lengths were positioned to reproduce native anteversion and match contralateral leg length and offset. The type and location of impingement was then recorded with recreation of anterior and posterior impingement during standard and extreme ranges of motion (ROM).ResultsIn standard ROM, flexion produced both prosthetic and bony impingement and extension resulted in prosthetic impingement in models with lipped liners. In extreme ROM, anterior impingement was 78% bony in 32-mm articulations, and 88% bony in 36-mm articulations. Posterior impingement was 65% prosthetic in 32-mm articulations, and 55% prosthetic in 36-mm articulations. Dual mobility cups showed the greatest risk of posterior prosthetic impingement in hyperextension (74%).ConclusionIn standard ROM, both bony and prosthetic impingement occurred in flexion, while prosthetic impingement occurred in extension in models with lipped liners. In hyperextension, prosthetic impingement was more common than bony impingement, and was exclusively the cause of impingement when a lip was used. In flexion, impingement was primarily bony with the use of a 36-mm head. The risk of posterior prosthetic impingement was greatest with dual mobility cups.Level of Evidence3.     

Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach

Hip range of motion after total hip arthroplasty has been shown to be dependent on prosthetic design and component placement. We hypothesized that bony anatomy would significantly affect range of motion. Computer models of a current generation hip arthroplasty design were virtually implanted in a model of pelvis and femur in various orientations ranging from 35° to 55° cup abduction, 0° to 30° cup anteversion, and 0° to 30° femoral anteversion. Four head sizes ranging from 22.2 to 32 mm and two neck sizes ranging from 10‐mm and 12‐mm diameter were tested. Range of motion was recorded as maximum flexion–extension, abduction–adduction, and axial rotation of the femur before any contact between prosthetic components or bone was detected. Bony impingement preceded component impingement in about 44% of all conditions tested, ranging from 66% in adduction to 22% in extension. Range of motion increased as head size increased. However, increasing head size also increased the propensity for bony impingement, which tended to reduce the beneficial effect of increased head size on range of motion. Reducing neck diameter had a greater effect on prosthetic impingement (mean, 3.5° increase in range of motion) compared to bone impingement (mean, 1.9°). This model allowed for a clinically relevant assessment of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty and may also be used with patient‐specific geometry [such as that obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans] for more accurate preoperative planning. © 2007 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:443–452, 2008     

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation

Implant design and positioning are important factors in maintaining stability and minimizing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Although the advent of modular femoral stems and acetabular implants increased the number of head, neck, and liner designs, the features of recent designs can cause intra-articular prosthetic impingement within the arc of motion required for normal daily activities and thus lead to limited motion, increased wear, osteolysis, and subluxation or dislocation. Minimizing impingement involves avoiding skirted heads, matching a 22-mm head with an appropriate acetabular implant, maximizing the head-to-neck ratio, and, when possible, using a chamfered acetabular liner and a trapezoidal, rather than circular, neck cross-section. Computer modeling studies indicate the optimal cup position is 45 degrees to 55 degrees abduction. Angles <55 degrees require anteversion of 10 degrees to 20 degrees of both the stem and cup to minimize the risk of impingement and dislocation.     

The Influence of Pelvic Tilt on the Anteversion Angle of the Acetabular Prosthesis

The concept of the “safe area” of the acetabular prosthesis has a long history and has been recognized by many scholars. It is generally believed that postoperative hip dislocation rate is low, when the acetabular anteversion angle is placed in the range of 15° ± 10°. Despite this, hip dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty. In recent years, more and more scholars have paid attention to the influence of pelvic tilt on the acetabular anteversion angle. The concept of acetabular anteversion changes as the pelvic tilt changes, and is challenging the traditional acetabular prosthesis “safe area.” This study summarized the potential influencing factors of pelvic tilt and discussed the influence of the phenomenon on the anteversion angle of total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular prosthesis based on the literature review. We conclude that from the supine position to standing, followed by sitting, the pelvis tends to move backward. Pelvic sagittal activity, lumbar disease (ankylosing spondylitis), lumbar fusion (lumbar fusion, spine‐pelvic fusion), and other factors related to the tilt are THA risk factors for postoperative dislocation and revision. With the change of body position, the degree of acetabular anteversion is directly related to the degree of pelvic tilt. The acetabular anteversion varies greatly, which leads to increased hip prosthesis wear and even hip dislocation. The lateral X‐ray of the spine and pelvis is recommended in supine, standing, and sitting positions before THA. In addition, the pelvic tilt should be regarded as a reference of the acetabular prosthesis in the preoperative planning of THA.     

Squatting After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Patient-Reported Outcomes and In Vivo Three-Dimensional Kinematic Study

BackgroundSquatting is an important function for many daily activities, but has not been well documented after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study investigated the participation rate of squatting and in vivo kinematics during squatting.MethodsA survey questionnaire about squatting was mailed to patients who underwent primary THA and 328 patients returned acceptable responses. Additionally, 32 hips were evaluated for dynamic 3-dimensional kinematics of squatting using density-based image-matching techniques. Multivariate analyses were applied to determine which factors were associated with anterior liner-to-neck distance at maximum hip flexion.ResultsPatients who could easily squat significantly increased this ability postoperatively (23.5% vs 46%, P < .01). In 29.5% of the patients there was still no ability to squat after THA; the main reason was anxiety of dislocation (34.2%). Kinematic analysis revealed that maximum hip flexion averaged 80.7° ± 12.3° with 12.8° ± 10.7° of posterior pelvic tilt and 9.7 ± 3.0 mm of anterior liner-to-neck distance. Neither liner-to-neck, bone-to-bone, nor bone-to-implant contact was observed in any of the hips. Larger hip flexion and smaller cup anteversion were negatively associated with the anterior liner-to-neck distance at maximum hip flexion (P < .05).ConclusionPostoperatively, approximately 70% of patients squatted easily or with support. Anxiety of dislocation made patients avoid squatting after THA. In vivo squatting kinematics suggest no danger of impingement or subsequent dislocation, but excessively large hip flexion and small cup anteversion remain as risks.     

An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty

We have developed an intraoperative model to quantify total hip arthroplasty impingement and dislocation mechanics using fluoroscopy and shape-matching techniques. Two patient groups were investigated: group 1 consisted of 12 hips using 28- or 32-mm femoral heads and an anterolateral surgical approach, and group 2 consisted of 17 hips using 22- or 26-mm femoral heads and a posterolateral surgical approach. During intraoperative hip stability testing consisting of extension and external rotation motions, group 1 was more unstable, and prosthetic impingement was the major reason for dislocation. With flexion and internal rotation motions, group 2 was more unstable, and superior-lateral impingement or soft tissue traction was the major reason for dislocation. Intraoperative quantitative assessment of hip mechanics provides a safe and clinically relevant method to characterize potential complications and evolve techniques to prevent them.     

The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic impingement due to poor positioning can limit the range of motion of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. In this study, a computer model was used to determine the effects of the positions of the acetabular and femoral components and of varying head-neck ratios on impingement and range of motion. METHODS: A three-dimensional generic hip prosthesis with a hemispherical cup, a neck diameter of 12.25 millimeters, and a head size ranging from twenty-two to thirty-two millimeters was simulated on a computer. The maximum range of motion of the hip was measured, before the neck impinged on the liner of the cup, for acetabular abduction angles ranging from 35 to 55 degrees and acetabular and femoral anteversion ranging from 0 to 30 degrees. Stability of the hip was estimated as the maximum possible flexion coupled with 10 degrees of adduction and 10 degrees of internal rotation and also as the maximum possible extension coupled with 10 degrees of external rotation. The effects of prosthetic orientation on activities of daily living were analyzed as well. RESULTS: Acetabular abduction angles of less than 45 degrees decreased flexion and abduction of the hip, whereas higher angles decreased adduction and rotation. Femoral and acetabular anteversion increased flexion but decreased extension. Acetabular abduction angles of between 45 and 55 degrees permitted a better overall range of motion and stability when combined with appropriate acetabular and femoral anteversion. Lower head-neck ratios decreased the range of motion that was possible without prosthetic impingement. The addition of a modular sleeve that increased the diameter of the femoral neck by two millimeters decreased the range of motion by 1.5 to 8.5 degrees, depending on the direction of motion that was studied. CONCLUSIONS: There is a complex interplay between the angles of orientation of the femoral and acetabular components. Acetabular abduction angles between 45 and 55 degrees, when combined with appropriate acetabular and femoral anteversion, resulted in a maximum overall range of motion and stability with respect to prosthetic impingement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: During total hip arthroplasty, acetabular abduction is often constrained by available bone coverage, while femoral anteversion may be dictated by the geometry of the femoral shaft. For each combination of acetabular abduction and femoral anteversion, there is an optimum range of acetabular anteversion that allows the potential for a maximum range of motion without prosthetic impingement after total hip arthroplasty. These data can be used intraoperatively to determine optimum position.     

Acetabular and Femoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Although most hip dislocations occur in either standing or sitting position, the safe zone for implant position is defined for the supine position. Our goal was to determine preoperative and postoperative pelvis and hip orientations and whether the safe zone defined in supine position can be used to assess standing radiographs.

Does Functional Cup Orientation Change at Minimum of 10 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BackgroundCup orientation has been shown to influence the postoperative risk of impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and may change over time due to changes in pelvic tilt that occur with aging. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant change in acetabular cup inclination and anteversion over a 10-year period following THA.MethodsA retrospective, multisurgeon, single-center cohort study was conducted of 46 patients that underwent THA between 1995 and 2002. A total of 46 patients were included, with a median age at surgery of 56 years, and a median time between initial postoperative radiograph and the most recent one being 13.5 years (minimum 10 years). Cup orientation was measured from postoperative and follow-up supine anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs. Using a validated software, inclination and anteversion were calculated at each interval and the change in cup anteversion and inclination angle was determined. Furthermore, the difference in the sacro-femoral-pubic angle was measured, reflecting the difference in pelvic tilt between intervals.ResultsNo significant difference was detected between measurements taken from initial postoperative radiograph and measurements a minimum of 10 years later (P > .45), with the median (interquartile range) change in anteversion, inclination, and sacro-femoral-pubic being 0° (−1° to 3°), 1° (−3° to 2°), and 0° (−2° to 3°), respectively.ConclusionOur study found no significant change in functional cup orientation a minimum of 10 years after THA. No shifts in functional cup orientation as a result of altering spinopelvic alignment seemed to be present over a 10-year period.     

The Current Knowledge on Spinopelvic Mobility

Recent studies may suggest that our conventional knowledge of risk factors for dislocation may need rethinking. Previous studies have demonstrated a large majority of total hip arthroplasty instability with acetabular cups implanted in safe zones. Recently discovered spinopelvic motion is a coordinated biomechanical relationship among acetabular anteversion, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis. Classification includes normal, hypermobile, stiff, stuck standing, stuck sitting, and fused. Normal spinopelvic motion from standing to sitting occurs with hip flexion, posterior sacral tilt, and decreased lumbar lordosis to accommodate a flexed femur and prevent impingement and dislocation. Acetabular cup implantation ideally is adapted based on spinopelvic interactions. This may lower the rate of impingement and subsequent dislocation. These new biomechanical interactions may provide a better understanding of the safe zones of anteversion and inclination.     

Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Cup Placement of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective,Randomized, Controlled Study

BackgroundMalposition of the acetabular component during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased risk of dislocation, reduced range of motion, and accelerated wear. The purpose of this study is to compare cup positioning with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system and conventional surgical technique.MethodsIn a prospective, randomized, clinical study, cups were implanted with a portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system (navigation group; n = 55) or conventional technique (conventional group; n = 55). THA was conducted in the lateral position and through posterior approach. The cup position was determined postoperatively on pelvic radiograph and computed tomography scans.ResultsAn average cup abduction of 39.2° ± 4.6° (range, 27° to 50°) and an average cup anteversion of 14.6° ± 6.1° (range, 1° to 27.5°) were found in the navigation group, and an average cup abduction of 42.9° ± 8.0° (range, 23° to 73°) and an average cup anteversion of 11.6° ± 7.7° (range, −12.1° to 25°) in the conventional group. A smaller variation in the navigation group was indicated for cup abduction (P = .001). The deviations from the target cup position were significantly lower in the navigation group (P = .001, .016). While only 37 of 55 cups in the conventional group were inside the Lewinnek safe zone, 51 of 55 cups in the navigation group were placed inside this safe zone (P = .006). The navigation procedure took a mean of 10 minutes longer than the conventional technique.ConclusionUse of the portable, accelerometer-based hip navigation system can improve cup positioning in THA.     

Quantitative Effect of Pelvic Position on Radiographic Assessment of Acetabular Component Position

Background

Intraoperative fluoroscopy aims to improve component position in total hip arthroplasty. Measurement bias related to image quality, however, has not been quantified. We aim to quantify measurement bias in the interpretation of acetabular component position as a function of pelvis and fluoroscopic beam position in a simulated supine total hip arthroplasty model.

Change in Pelvic Sagittal Inclination From Supine to Standing Position Before Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Cup anteversion and inclination are important for avoiding implant impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. However, functional cup anteversion and cup inclination also change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. Therefore, PSI in both supine and standing positions was measured in a large cohort in this study.

全髋翻修术后假体脱位的预防

目的：探讨采用后方关节囊重建方法对行后外侧入路全髋翻修术后假体脱位的防治作用。方法：本组45例（47髋）经后外侧入路行全髋翻修术的患者，男20例，女25例；平均年龄65岁（55-78岁）。术中将后方关节囊与外旋肌群分别重建固定于前上方原先切开的关节囊断端和大转子顶端的软组织处，回顾性分析术后假体脱位率及脱位的风险因素。股骨假体和髋臼假体均翻修29例（31髋），更换内衬5例（5髋），髋臼、股骨翻修的分别是10例（10髋）和1例（1髋）。第1次翻修的有29例（30髋），第2次翻修的有15例（16髋），第3次翻修的有1例（1髋）。X线评估包括翻修前后下肢长度，髋臼位相，股骨偏心距、前倾角和假体松动。临床功能评价采用Harris评分。结果：45例均获随访，平均随访时间2．7年，除1例感觉前方不稳外，无髋关节感染及脱位发生，该例X线片示髋臼假体过度前倾但无脱位发生。术后所有患者双下肢基本等长，髋臼外展角及前倾角、股骨偏心距和前倾角基本恢复至初次手术前水平。髋臼、股骨假体发生松动各1例。髋关节功能Harris评分由术前平均（49.13±15．53）分升至末次随访的平均（83．59±6.93）分（P〈0．05）。按Harris功能评分标准：优36髋，良5髋，可5髋，差1髋。结论：在假体安放正确、软组织张力恢复满意基础上，后方关节囊及外旋肌群重建有助于降低后外侧入路全髋翻修术后假体脱位的发生率。     

Variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt and their impact on prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty

Optimization of the combined anteversion of cup and stem has been emphasized to avoid prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, no study has focused on the impact of variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt against the whole femur on prosthetic range of motion. The purposes of the present study were a) to quantify the anatomical variation of sagittal and coronal tilt of the proximal canal axis against the femoral retrocondylar coordinate system, that is variation of sagittal and coronal stem tilt and b) to determine their impact on the zone of impingement‐free cup position using computer simulation. Preoperative computed tomography images of 477 femurs from 409 consecutive patients who underwent THA using computed tomography‐based computer navigation were stored. Virtual implantation of an anatomical stem was performed on the navigation workstation. The safe zone of the cup position with regard to prosthetic impingement was determined by motion simulation in the range of sagittal and coronal stem tilt of the subjects. The sagittal and coronal stem tilt varied by 10°, which was smaller than the stem anteversion variation. However, there was about 3 times the difference in the impingement‐free zone of cup position in the ranges of sagittal and coronal stem tilt. The safe zone was significantly decreased by posterior tilt and valgus tilt of the stem. Range of motion simulation revealed that the variations in sagittal or coronal stem tilt significantly influenced the safe zone of the cup. In conclusion, although the variations in sagittal and coronal stem tilt against the femoral retrocondylar coordinate system were small, their impact on prosthetic impingement was significant.     

The optimal combined anteversion pattern to achieve a favorable impingement-free angle in total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundThere have been no studies on the differences in impingement-free angle that result from different combined anteversion (CA) patterns. The aim of this study was to find the optimal CA pattern for achieving a favorable impingement-free angle, including bony and prosthetic impingement, in total hip arthroplasty.MethodsWe evaluated 100 patients with no hip arthritis. We investigated the impingement-free angle (flexion, internal rotation with 90° flexion, extension, and external rotation) after changing the stem and cup anteversions to satisfy several CA patterns [cup anteversion + stem anteversion = 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°; cup anteversion + 0.7 × stem anteversion = 37.3° (:Widmer's theory); and cup anteversion + 0.77 × stem anteversion = 43.3° (:Yoshimine's theory)] using 3-dimensional templating software.ResultsThe impingement-free angle changed dramatically among the various CA patterns. The optimal CA was changed by various stem anteversion. Only CA: Widmer with stem anteversion of 20° satisfied daily-life range of motion (ROM) requirements (flexion ≥130°, internal rotation with 90° flexion ≥ 45°, extension ≥ 40°, external rotation ≥ 40°).ConclusionGood impingement-free angle cannot be obtained with single fixed CA. Different CA patterns should be used, depending on the differences in the stem anteversion. A CA of 30° with 0° ≤ stem anteversion ≤10°; a CA:Widmer with 20° of stem anteversion; a CA of 40° or Widmer with 30° of stem anteversion. When stem anteversion is ≥40°, CA should be decided by each patient's state. Among them, a stem anteversion of 20° with cup anteversion of 23.3° was found to be the best CA pattern.     

Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

Impingement between femoral neck and endoprosthetic cup is one of the causes for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Choosing a correct combined orientation of both components, the acetabular cup and femoral stem, in manual or computer-assisted implantation will yield a maximized, stable range of motion (ROM) and will reduce the risk for dislocation. A mathematical model of a THA was developed to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion for maximizing ROM and minimizing the risk for cup-neck impingement. Single and combined hip joint motions were tested. A radiographic definition was used for component orientation. Additional parameters, such as stem-neck (CCD) angle, head-neck ratio, and the design of the acetabular opening, were also considered. The model showed that a maximized and safe ROM requires compliant, well-defined combinations of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion depending on the intended ROM. Radiographic cup anteversion and stem antetorsion were linearly correlated. Additional internal rotation reduced flexion, and additional external rotation reduced extension, abduction and adduction. The articulating hemispheric surface of acetabular cups should be oriented between 40 degrees and 45 degrees of radiographic inclination, between 20 degrees and 28 degrees of radiographic cup anteversion, and should be combined with stem antetorsion so that the sum of cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 37 degrees. Final component orientation must also consider cup containment, implant impingement with bone and soft tissue, and preoperative skeletal contractures or deformities to achieve the optimal compromise for each patient.