Transgenic anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody secretion by mouse segmental pancreas allografts promotes long term survival

To compare the effectiveness of transgenic and systemic monoclonal antibody therapy for pancreas transplantation, vascularised segmental pancreas allografts from wild-type or transgenic pancreatic tissue that secreted monoclonal anti-CD4 were placed in CBA recipients in which diabetes had been induced chemically by streptozotocin (STZ, non-autoimmune diabetes). In untreated CBA recipients, wild-type BALB/c or C57BL/6 bml pancreas transplants were rejected in a mean survival time (MST) of 27 and 30 days, respectively. BALB/c and C57BL/6 graft survival improved when recipients were given a short course of T cell depleting monoclonal anti-CD4 antibody, (GK 1.5, 2 mg total on days -1, 0, 1, 2 with grafting on day 0) with MST +/- S.D. of 71 +/- 29 and 44 +/- 36 days, respectively. Thus, transient depletion of CD4 was effective in delaying pancreas allograft rejection in these strain combinations. The use of C57BL/6 bml mice transgenic for a rat anti-CD4 antibody (GK5 mice) as pancreas donors provided allografts that secreted sufficient anti-CD4 antibody to cause CD4 T cell depletion in the recipients (CD4 cells decreased from 30 to < 5% of small lymphocytes). This degree of depletion was not sustained and the CD4 recovery inversely correlated with graft survival. Mice with > 20% CD4 cells in the splenic lymphocyte population 4 weeks post-transplant rejected their grafts (3 of 10 mice). However, in 7 of 10 mice CD4 cells remained low (< 15%) and allografts survived for > 80 days. The GK5 allografts survived significantly longer than those from non-transgenic bml controls (MST 83 +/- 32 days, compared with 30 days, P < 0.0005). This survival time was similar to that of BALB/c allografts in CBA recipients treated with a high dose of anti-CD4 antibody. Thus, transgenic secretion of anti-CD4 antibody by the pancreas allograft was very effective in prolonging its survival.     

Rejection responses to allogeneic hepatocytes by reconstituted SCID mice, CD4, KO, and CD8 KO mice

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the capacity of CD4+, CD8+, or non-T cells to independently initiate acute rejection of allogeneic hepatocytes using reconstituted SCID, CD4 or CD8 knockout (KO) recipient mice. METHODS: Allogeneic hepatocytes (FVB/N, H-2q) were transplanted into C57BL/6.SCID (H-2b), CD4 KO (H-2b), CD8 KO (H-2b), or beige/beige (H-2b) mice. SCID mice with functioning hepatocellular allografts subsequently received purified non-T cells (NTC), CD4+, or CD8+ splenocytes. Some mice were treated with anti-CD4, anti-CD8, and/or anti-nkl.1 mAb. Recipient mice were also assessed for donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses and donor-reactive alloantibody production. RESULTS: Median hepatocellular allograft survival time (MST) was 28 days in CD4+ reconstituted SCID mice and 14 days in CD8+ reconstituted SCID mice. SCID hosts reconstituted with NTC demonstrated indefinite hepatocellular allograft survival (>120 days). MST was 10 days in untreated beige/beige (NK cell deficient) mice. MST was 14 days in untreated, 35 days in anti-CD4 mAb treated, and 10 days in anti-nkl.1 mAb treated CD8 KO mice. MST was 10 days in untreated, 35 days in anti-CD8 mAb treated, and 7 days in anti-nk1.1 mAb treated CD4 KO mice. Donor-reactive DTH responses were not detected in reconstituted SCID mice, were minimal in CD4 KO mice, and were prominent in CD8 KO mice after rejection of allogeneic hepatocytes. Similarly, donor-reactive alloantibody, was not detected in CD4 KO hosts, but was readily detected in CD8 KO hosts. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (but not host NTC) can independently initiate the rejection of allogeneic hepatocytes. While hepatocyte rejection by isolated CD4+ T cells is not surprising, rejection by CD8+ T cells (in the absence of CD4+ T cells) was unusual, and may explain the failure of "standard" immunosuppressive regimens to suppress acute rejection of allogeneic hepatocytes, as noted in prior studies. Furthermore, NK cells do not appear to be required for either CD4+ T cell or CD8+ T cell initiated hepatocyte rejection.     

Critical Role for CD8+ T Cells in Allograft Acceptance Induced by DST and CD40/CD154 Costimulatory Blockade

Donor-specific transfusion (DST) and CD40/CD154 costimulation blockade is a powerful immunosuppressive strategy which prolongs survival of many allografts. The efficacy of DST and anti-CD154 mAb for prolongation of hepatocellular allograft survival was only realized in C57BL/6 mice that have both CD4- and CD8-dependent pathways available (median survival time, MST, 82 days). Hepatocyte rejection in CD8 KO mice which is CD4-dependent was not suppressed by DST and anti-CD154 mAb treatment (MST, 7 days); unexpectedly DST abrogated the beneficial effects of anti-CD154 mAb for suppression of hepatocyte rejection (MST, 42 days) and on donor-reactive alloantibody production. Hepatocyte rejection in CD4 KO mice which is CD8-dependent was suppressed by treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb therapy (MST, 35 days) but did not differ significantly from immunotherapy with anti-CD154 mAb alone (MST, 32 days). Induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by DST and anti-CD154 mAb immunotherapy was dependent on host CD8(+) T cells, as demonstrated by CD8 depletion studies in C57BL/6 mice (MST, 14 days) and CD8 reconstitution of CD8 KO mice (MST, 56 days). These studies demonstrate that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets contribute to induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by this immunotherapeutic strategy.     

CD4+ T cells are critical for corneal, but not skin, allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: The relative contribution of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in allograft rejection remains to be fully characterized. Some reports indicate that there is an absolute requirement for CD4+ T cells in allogeneic rejection, whereas others report that CD4-depleted mice are capable of rejecting certain types of allografts. METHODS: We compared the ability of CD4- knockout (KO), CD8- KO, and normal CD4+/CD8+ mice to reject allogeneic corneal or skin grafts. We also examined delayed-type hypersensitivity and CTL responses to donor alloantigens. RESULTS: Engraftment of C57BL/6 corneas to C.B6-(n5-7) CD4-KO mice resulted in significantly higher rates of acceptance (>85%) than either C.B6-(n5-7) CD8- KO (30%) or normal BALB/c mice (40%). Likewise, mean survival times for B6 skin grafts placed on C.B6-(n5-7) CD4- KO mice (29.2 +/- 3.5 days) were significantly increased over those of normal BALB/c mice (13.2 +/- 1 days), although most CD4- KO mice (70%) eventually reject their grafts. C.B6-(n5-7) CD4- KO mice that reject allogeneic grafts fail to develop a delayed-type hypersensitivity response, but they did demonstrate significantly greater cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) frequencies than did CD4- KO mice that accepted such grafts or that were not grafted. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that mice lacking CD4+ T cells have a significantly impaired ability to reject corneal allografts, but are able, in most cases, to reject allogeneic skin grafts. Thus, in the absence of CD4+ T cells, the likely mechanism for rejection appears to involve the generation of CD8+ CTLs.     

An increase in the survival of murine H-2-mismatched cultured fetal pancreas allografts using depleting or nondepleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies, and a further increase with the addition of cyclosporine

Depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has been shown to prolong allograft survival in mice. In this study, two rat anti-CD4 mAbs, H129.19 and GK1.5, were administered either alone or in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) to recipients of MHC-mismatched (H-2k to H-2d) cultured fetal pancreas allografts to determine their effect on graft survival. When compared with control mice, splenic CD4+ cells of GK1.5-treated mice were depleted by greater than 95%, but in H129.19-treated mice no depletion of CD4+ cells occurred. Instead, rat Ig was present on the surface of CD4+ cells in H129.19-treated mice. Anti-CD4 therapy with either H129.19 or GK1.5 prolonged fetal pancreas allograft survival to a similar extent, but did not lead to indefinite survival. Blockade of the CD4 antigen by the mAb H129.19 was as effective as the depletion of CD4+ cells by GK1.5 in prolonging allograft survival. Rejection of grafts by day 28 posttransplantation occurred in the absence of CD4+ cells, as determined by both flow cytometric examination of spleen cells and immunoperoxidase staining of the graft site. CsA alone did not prolong graft survival, but its addition to either H129.19 or GK1.5 mAb treatment significantly increased the survival rate of grafts at 28 days compared with mAb treatment alone. These results suggest that CD4+ cell depletion is not essential for effective anti-CD4 mAb therapy--and, further, that CsA may have a direct inhibitory effect on CD8+ cells during allograft rejection.     

Patterns of immune responses evoked by allogeneic hepatocytes: evidence for independent co-dominant roles for CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in acute rejection.

INTRODUCTION: This is the first in a series of reports that characterizes immune responses evoked by allogeneic hepatocytes using a functional model of hepatocyte transplantation in mice. METHODS: "Donor" hepatocytes expressing the transgene human alpha-1-antitrypsin (hA1AT-FVB/N, H2q) were transplanted into C57BL/6 (H2b) or MHC II knockout (H2b) hosts treated with anti-CD4, anti-CD8, or a combination of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Hepatocyte rejection was determined as a loss of circulating ELISA-detectable transgene product (hA1AT). In addition, some C57BL/6 mice underwent transplantation with FVB/N heterotopic cardiac allografts and were treated with anti-CD4 mAb. Cardiac allograft rejection was determined by palpation. Graft recipients were tested for donor-reactive alloantibodies and donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. RESULTS: The median survival time (MST) of allogeneic hepatocytes in normal C57BL/6 mice was 10 days (no treatment), 10 days (anti-CD4 mAb), 14 days (anti-CD8 mAb), and 35 days (anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs). The MST of hepatocytes in B6 MHC class II knockout mice was 10 days (no treatment) and 21 days (anti-CD8 mAb). The MST of cardiac allografts was 11 days (no treatment) and >100 days (anti-CD4 mAb). Donor-reactive DTH responses were readily detected in both untreated and mAb-treated recipients. Donor-reactive alloantibody was barely detectable in untreated hosts. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that allogeneic hepatocytes are highly immunogenic and stimulate strong cell-mediated immune responses by both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, even when treated with agents that can cause acceptance of cardiac allografts. Indeed, CD4+ or CD8+ T cells seem to independently cause hepatocellular allograft rejection. Allogeneic hepatocytes evoked strong donor-reactive DTH responses but were poor stimuli for donor-reactive antibody production. This is an unusual pattern of immune reactivity in allograft recipients.     

Regulation of skin and islet allograft survival in mice treated with costimulation blockade is mediated by different CD4+ cell subsets and different mechanisms

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific transfusion (DST) and a brief course of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces permanent islet and prolonged skin allograft survival in mice. Induction of skin allograft survival requires the presence of CD4 cells and deletion of alloreactive CD8 cells. The specific roles of CD4 and CD4CD25 cells and the mechanism(s) by which they act are not fully understood. METHODS: We used skin and islet allografts, a CD8 T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic model system, and in vivo depleting antibodies to analyze the role of CD4 cell subsets in regulating allograft survival in mice treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. RESULTS: Deletion of CD4 or CD25 cells during costimulation blockade induced rapid rejection of skin but only minimally shortened islet allograft survival. Deletion of CD4 or CD25 cells had no effect upon survival of healed-in islet allografts, and CD25 cell deletion had no effect upon healed-in skin allograft survival. In the TCR transgenic model, DST plus anti-CD154 mAb treatment deleted alloreactive CD8 T cells, and anti-CD4 mAb treatment prevented that deletion. In contrast, injection of anti-CD25 mAb did not prevent alloreactive CD8 T cell deletion. CONCLUSIONS: These data document that (1) both CD4CD25 and CD4CD25 cells are required for induction of skin allograft survival, (2) CD4CD25 T cells are not required for alloreactive CD8 T cell deletion, and (3) CD4CD25 regulatory cells are not critical for islet allograft tolerance. It appears that skin and islet transplantation tolerance are mediated by different CD4 cell subsets and different mechanisms.     

Mediation of skin allograft rejection in scid mice by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

We analyzed the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in H-2-disparate skin allograft rejection in the mutant mouse strain C.B-17/Icr scid with severe combined immunodeficiency. On the day of skin allografting, scid mice were adoptively transferred with negatively selected CD4+ or CD8+ splenocytes from normal unsensitized C.B-17/Icr mice. These populations were obtained using a double-mAb--plus--complement elimination protocol using anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 mAb that resulted in no detectable CD4+ or CD8+ cells by FACS and negligible numbers of cytolytic T lymphocytes by limiting dilution analysis in anti-CD8 treated populations. Spleen cells were removed from grafted mice at the time of rejection and were tested in vitro for antidonor reactivity in several assays: mixed lymphocyte culture, cell-mediated lympholysis, and LDA for CTL and for IL-2-producing HTL. The presence of Thy 1.2+, CD4+, or CD8+ cells was determined by FACS. All control C.B-17 mice and scid mice adoptively transferred with nondepleted CD4+, and CD8+ cells rejected skin allografts with similar mean survival times (15.6 +/- 1.5, 18.8 +/- 3.4, 18.0 +/- 5.4, respectively), whereas control scid mice retain skin allografts indefinitely (all greater than 100 days). C.B-17 syngeneic grafts survived indefinitely in all groups. At the time of rejection, splenocytes from scid mice receiving CD4+ cells had negligible donor-specific cytotoxicity in CML and negligible numbers of CTL by LDA, but demonstrated a good proliferative response in MLC and IL-2-producing cells by LDA (frequency = 1/1764). There were no detectable CD8+ cells present by FACS analysis. Conversely, splenocytes from scid mice adoptively transferred with CD8+ cells had strong donor-specific cytotoxicity in CML (58.8% +/- 16.1%) and CTL by LDA (frequency = 1/3448), but no significant proliferation was detected in MLC. There were no detectable CD4+ cells by FACS, but there were small numbers of IL-2-producing cells by LDA (frequency = 1/10,204). These data demonstrate that CD4+ cells adoptively transferred into scid mice are capable of mediating skin allograft rejection in the absence of any detectable CD8+ cells or significant functional cytolytic activity. The adoptive transfer of CD8+ cells also results in skin allograft rejection in the absence of detectable CD4+ cells. The detection of small numbers of IL-2 secreting cells in these mice may indicate that CD(8+)-mediated allograft rejection in this model is dependent on IL-2-secreting CD8+ cells.     

A major role for host MHC class I antigen presentation for promoting islet allograft survival

The purpose of this study was to determine the role for CD8 T cells versus generalized MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation in islet allograft rejection and tolerance. Diabetic C57BI/6 (B6, H-2(b)) controls, C57BI/6 CD8-deficient (CD8 KO), or MHC class I-deficient C57BI/6 (beta 2m KO) recipients were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islets. Islet allografts were acutely rejected in untreated B6, CD8 KO, and in beta 2m KO mice, indicating that neither CD8 T cells nor host MHC class I is required for allograft rejection. We then determined the efficacy of costimulation blockade in these same strains. Costimulation blockade with anti-CD154 therapy facilitated long-term islet allograft survival in both B6 and in CD8 KO recipients. However, anti-CD154 treated beta 2m KO recipients were completely refractory to anti-CD154 therapy; all treated animals acutely rejected islet allografts with or without therapy. Also, anti-NK1.1 treatment of wild-type B6 mice abrogated graft prolongation following anti-CD154 therapy. Taken together, results show a dramatic distinction between two forms of MHC class I-restricted pathways in allograft prolongation. Although anti-CD154-induced allograft survival was CD8 T-cell independent, an intact host MHC class I-restricted (beta 2m-dependent) pathway is nevertheless necessary for allograft survival. This pathway required NK1.1+ cells, implicating NK and/or NKT cells in promoting allograft prolongation in vivo.     

Requirement of CD4 cells for induction and maintenance of unresponsiveness in islet xenografted mice

Abstract: Long-term survival of islet xenografts in the hamster to mouse model can be induced by a short-course treatment with a nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb but not with a depleting anti-CD4 mAb (Lu et al. Xenotransplantation 1998; 5:154–1631. Although CD4 cells are known to play a key role in the rejection of islet xenografts, it remains unclear whether CD4 cells are also required for the induction and/or maintenance of specific unresponsiveness to xenografts. To investigate this problem, islets were isolated from golden hamsters and transplanted into streptozotocin-induced diabetic CBA/J mice. Nondepleting mAb YTS 177.9 was used to block CD4 cells for the induction of islet xenograft unresponsiveness and subsequently depleting mAb GK1.5 to deplete CD4 cells in the unresponsive recipients.
First, we now confirm that second donor-strain xenografts were permanently accepted in recipients that had been unresponsive to the first grafts, whereas Lewis rat islet xenografts, used as third-party grafts, were rejected like a primary graft within 7–8 days. Second, we depleted CD4 cells in recipient mice, which had been treated perioperatively with the nondepleting mAb YTS 177.9 and became unresponsive to their primary hamster islet graft, by using a depleting anti-CD4 mAb at different time points post-transplant. Depletion of CD4 cells in the unresponsive recipients by the depleting anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5 did abrogate this unresponsive state, since the grafts were always rejected within an average of 25.5 days after the mAb GK1.5 injections. Therefore, our results strongly suggest that CD4 positive cells play an active suppressive role and that their presence in the recipients appears essential for both induction and maintenance of long-term islet xenograft survival or specific unresponsiveness.     

Non-depleting anti-CD4, but not anti-CD8, antibody induces long-term survival of xenogeneic and allogeneic hearts in alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GT-Ko) mice

The anti-galactose-alpha1,3-galactose (Gal) antibody (Ab) response following pig-to-human transplantation is vigorous and largely resistant to currently available immunosuppression. The recent generation of GT-Ko mice provides a unique opportunity to study the immunological basis of xenograft-elicited anti-Gal Ab response in vivo, and to test the efficacy of various strategies at controlling this Ab response [1]. In this study, we compared the ability of non-depleting anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 to control rejection and antibody production in GT-Ko mice following xenograft and allograft transplantation. Hearts from baby Lewis rat or C3H mice were transplanted heterotopically into GT-Ko. Non-depleting anti-CD4 (YTS177) and anti-CD8 (YTS105) Abs were used at 1 mg/mouse, and given as four doses daily from day -2 to 1 then q.o.d. till day 21. Xenograft rejection occurred at 3 to 5 days post-transplantation in untreated GT-Ko recipients, and was histologically characterized as vascular rejection. Anti-CD4, but not anti-CD8, Ab treatment prolonged xenograft survival to 68 to 74 days and inhibited anti-Gal Ab as well as xeno-Ab production. In four of the five hearts from anti-CD4 mAbs-treated GT-Ko mice, we observed classic signs of chronic rejection, namely, thickened intima in the lumen of vessels, significant IgM deposition, fibrosis and modest mononuclear cell infiltrate of Mac-1+ macrophages and scattered T cells (CD8>CD4). Xenograft rejection in untreated, as well as anti-CD4- and anti-CD8-treated, recipients was associated with increased intragraft IL-6, IFN-gamma and IL-10 mRNA. C3H allografts were rejected in 7 to 9 days by untreated GT-Ko mice and were histologically characterized as cellular rejection. Treatment with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAb resulted in graft survivals of >94.8 and 11.8 days, respectively. Anti-CD4 mAb treatment resulted in a transient inhibition of alloreactive and anti-Gal Ab production. The presence of circulating alloreactive and anti-Gal Abs at >50 days post-transplant was associated with significant IgM and IgG deposition in the graft. Yet, in the anti-CD4 mAb-treated group, the allografts showed no signs of rejection at the time of sacrifice (>100 days post-transplantation). All rejected allografts had elevated levels of intragraft IL-6, IFN-gamma and IL-10 mRNA, while the long-surviving anti-CD4-treated allografts had reduced mRNA levels of these cytokines. Collectively, our studies suggest that the elicited xeno-antibody production and anti-Gal Ab production in GT-Ko mice are CD4+ T-cell dependent. The majority of xenografts succumbed to chronic rejection, while allografts survived with minimal histological change, despite elevated levels of circulating alloAbs. Thus, immunosuppression with anti-CD4 mAb therapy induces long-term survival of allografts more effectively than to xenografts.     

CD4+ T cell recognition of a single discordant HLA-A2-transgenic molecule through the indirect antigen presentation pathway induces acute rejection of murine cardiac allografts.

To further define the role of indirect allorecognition, cardiac allografts from HLA-A2-transgenic (HLA-A2+) C57BL/6 mice were heterotopically transplanted into normal C57BL/6, CD4 T cell-knockout (KO) C57BL/6 mice, CD8 T cell-KO C57BL/6 mice, fully MHC-discordant BALB/c mice (allogeneic control), and HLA-A2+ C57BL/6 mice (syngeneic control). HLA-A2+ grafts were acutely rejected when transplanted into BALB/c mice (mean survival time: 10+/-0.8 days), normal C57BL/6 mice (mean survival time: 16.5+/-2.1 days) as well as CD8-KO mice (mean survival time: 12.8+/-1.3 days). Histopathological analysis revealed classical acute cellular rejection with moderate to severe diffuse interstitial CD4+ and CD8+ cellular infiltrates and significant intra-graft deposition of IgG and complement. In contrast, HLA-A2+ grafts were not rejected when transplanted into CD4-KO mice or HLA-A2+ mice. CD8-KO recipients treated with an anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, but not with an anti-NK monoclonal antibody, failed to reject their allografts with prolonged administration of antibody (30 days). Spleen cells from mice rejecting HLA-A2+ allografts failed to lyse HLA-A2+ target cells indicating a lack of involvement of CD8+ T cells in the rejection process. In contrast, spleen cells from rejecting animals proliferated significantly to both HLA-A2+ cells and to a peptide derived from the HLA-A2 molecule. Development of anti-HLA-A2 antibodies was observed in all animals rejecting HLA-A2+ allografts. These results suggest that indirect allorecognition of donor MHC class I molecules leads to rejection of cardiac allografts and development of alloantibodies in this unique transplant model in which there is a single MHC discordance between donor and recipient.     

Rat xenograft survival in mice treated with donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody is enhanced by elimination of host CD4+ cells

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a donor-specific transfusion (DST) and a brief course of anti-mouse CD154 (anti-CD40-ligand) monoclonal antibody (mAb) prolongs the survival of both allografts and rat xenografts in mice. The mechanism by which allograft survival is prolonged is incompletely understood, but depends in part on the presence of CD4+ cells and the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Less is known about the mechanism by which this protocol prolongs xenograft survival. METHODS: We measured rat islet and skin xenograft survival in euthymic and thymectomized mice treated with combinations of DST, anti-CD154 mAb, anti-CD4 mAb, and anti-CD8 mAb. Recipients included C57BL/6, C57BL/6-scid, C57BL/6-CD4null, and C57BL/6-CD8null mice. RESULTS: Pretreatment with a depleting anti-CD4 mAb markedly prolonged the survival of both skin and islet xenografts in mice given DST plus anti-CD154 mAb. Comparable prolongation of xenograft survival was obtained in C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. In contrast, anti-CD8 mAb did not prolong the survival of either islet or skin xenografts in mice treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. Thymectomy did not influence xenograft survival in any treatment group. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes from C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb and bearing long-term skin xenografts revealed the presence of residual xenoreactive cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb induces a state of "functional" transplantation tolerance. They also support the hypothesis that both the induction and maintenance of graft survival based on this protocol depend on different cellular mechanisms in allogeneic and xenogeneic model systems.     

CD4+ T-cell-independent rejection of corneal allografts

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest that a significant number of corneal allografts undergo rejection in the absence of CD4 T cells. This study examined the role of CD4 T cell-independent mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection. METHODS: BALB/c corneal allografts were transplanted to C57BL/6 beige nude mice that received either CD8 or CD8 T cells from C57BL/6 CD4 knockout (KO) mice that had rejected BALB/c corneal allografts. Immune effector functions of CD8 or CD8 T cells from C57BL/6 CD4 KO mice were assessed using delayed-type hypersensitivity assays and Annexin V apoptosis assays respectively. RESULTS.: Both CD8 and CD8 T cells from CD4 KO corneal allograft rejector mice mediated corneal allograft rejection following adoptive transfer to nude mice. CD8 T cells, but not CD8 T cells, from CD4 KO mice adoptively transferred donor-specific DTH and induced apoptosis of BALB/c corneal endothelial cells in vitro. Apoptosis of BALB/c corneal endothelial cells was mediated by double negative (DN) T cells, as treatment of CD8 cells from CD4 KO mice with anti-Thy 1.2 plus complement abolished their effector function. CONCLUSION: The results support the proposition that CD4 T cell-independent rejection of corneal allografts can be mediated by either CD8 or CD8 T cells. The CD8 T cells represent a unique DN T cell population that might mediate rejection by either direct cytolysis or by inducing apoptosis of the donor corneal endothelium.     

Anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody treatment induces long-term, tissue-specific, immunologic hyporesponsiveness to peripheral nerve allografts

The CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway plays a crucial role in allograft rejection. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment as a method to induce long-term, tissue-specific, immunologic hyporesponsiveness to peripheral nerve allografts. Sciatic nerve allografts were performed from BALB/c donor mice into C57BL/6 recipients. Anti-CD40L mAb (1 mg) was administered intraperitoneally to recipient mice on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. After a 14-, 28-, or 60-day recovery period, the mice were rechallenged with either a BALB/c cardiac or peripheral nerve allograft. Rejection was assessed by measuring the production of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin (IL)-2, -4, and -5, and alloantibodies immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG. IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IgM, and IgG responses were much lower in the anti-CD40L mAb group compared with controls. Nerve allograft and nerve isograft rechallenge 60 days following the original nerve allotransplantation produced low cytokine responses, whereas cardiac allograft rechallenge produced high cytokine production, indicative of acute rejection. Short-term anti-CD40L treatment may cause long-term, tissue-specific, immunologic hyporesponsiveness. This may allow time for native axons to traverse the transplanted nerve allograft and replace the graft with autogenous peripheral nerve tissue.     

Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in murine skin and heart allograft rejection across different antigenic desparities

The factors that influence the relative contribution of the T cell subsets to allograft rejection remain unclear. We compared skin and heart rejection in CD4 Knockout (KO), and CD8 KO mice across full-, minor-, and class II histocompatibility antigen (HA) mismatches. Skin allografts were rejected by either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells alone at any degree of antigenic mismatch. However, either the absence of CD4+ cells or a lesser degree of HA mismatch resulted in prolongation of graft survival. In contrast, fully allogeneic heart grafts were accepted in CD4 KO recipients, and minor HA mismatched heart grafts were accepted by both CD4 KO and CD8 KO mice. Thus, the T cell subsets required for allograft rejection are determined by the immunogenicity of the tissue transplanted. In the absence of CD8+ T cells, perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) but not granzyme B mRNA were detected in rejecting grafts. Thus, granzyme B is a CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-specific effector molecule.     

Long-term survival of hamster islet xenografts in mice under short-course treatment with nondepleting versus depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies

ABSTRACT: Xenogeneic grafts provide a potential alternative to the current shortage of human organs for transplantation. However, the prevention of rejection and tolerance induction of xenografts still remain to be further explored. Islet xenografts appear more promising than vascularized whole organ xenografts and additionally also more resistant to the recurrence of autoimmune disease than allografts. Recently, the nondepleting monoclonal antibody (mAb), which blocks the CD4 molecule on lymphocytes, was reported to be able to induce tolerance in allotransplantation and CD4 positive cells were further confirmed to be a major factor responsible for cellular xenograft rejection. Therefore, we hypothesize that anti-CD4 nondepleting mAb could also be effective in protecting cellular xenografts and inducing unresponsiveness of recipients. We studied the effect of the nondepleting anti-CD4 mAb YTS177.9 on islet xenograft survival by using the hamster-to-mouse islet transplantation model. Results were compared with that of the depleting anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5 that was shown to have similar binding sites on the CD4 molecule to mAb YTS 177.9. Our data show that mAb YTS 177.9 did effectively prolong the survival of islet xenografts and, in addition, also successfully did induce long-term acceptance of 40% grafts after only three penoperative injections of 0.5 mg mAb per mouse. The average survival of the graft was markedly prolonged to >66.8±37.1 days compared with controls (8.3±1.4 days) or with the depleting anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5 (25.7±5.5 days). However, the latter displayed a more profound inhibition in in vitro and ex vivo mixed lymphocyte xenoreaction than mAb YTS 177.9. Moreover, the activity of this nondepleting mAb was found to be dose-dependent and 80% of grafts survived permanently when the dose was increased to six injections of 0.5 mg mAb. Like mAb GK1.5, mAb YTS 177.9 also prevented rejection when given after a delay of two days posttransplant. In addition, we found that neither depleting nor nondepleting anti-CD8 mAb was effective in this model. Our results strongly suggest that an anti-CD4 nondepleting or blocking mAb alone is able to induce long-term acceptance of islet xenografts and that blocking the CD4 molecule is significantly superior to depleting CD4 positive cells for the protection of islet xenografts. This may indicate that CD4 cells play a major role in xenograft tolerance induction.     

Analysis of the CD40 and CD28 pathways on alloimmune responses by CD4+ T cells in vivo

BACKGROUND: Blockade of the CD40 and CD28 pathways is a powerful strategy to inhibit CD4-mediated alloimmune responses. In this study, we examine the relative roles of the CD40 and CD28 pathways on CD4-mediated allograft rejection responses, and further characterize the role of these pathways on CD4+ T-cell activation, priming for cytokine production, and cell proliferation in response to alloantigen in vivo. METHODS: BALB/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 Rag 1-/- recipients reconstituted with CD4 cells from CD28-/- or CD40L-/- donors. The popliteal lymph node assay was used to study the role of these pathways on CD4-cell activation and priming in vivo. To investigate the role of CD40 and CD28 blockade on CD4-cell proliferation, the fluorescein dye carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester was used. We performed heterotopic cardiac transplantation using CD40-/- mice to evaluate the role of CD40 on donor versus recipient cells in CD4-mediated rejection. RESULTS: B6 Rag 1-/- recipients reconstituted with CD28-/- CD4+ T cells acutely rejected allografts (median survival time 15 days), whereas recipients reconstituted with CD40L-/- CD4+ T cells had significantly prolonged survival of BALB/c skin grafts (MST 71 days). CD40L blockade was equivalent to or inferior to CD28 blockade in inhibition of in vivo CD4-cell activation, priming for cytokine production, and proliferation responses to alloantigen. BALB/c recipients depleted of CD8 cells promptly rejected donor B6 CD40-/- cardiac allografts, whereas B6 CD40-/- recipients depleted of CD8 cells had significantly prolonged survival of BALB/c wild-type cardiac allografts. CONCLUSIONS: The CD40/CD40L pathway, but not the CD28/B7 pathway, is critical for CD4-mediated rejection responses, however, the responsible mechanisms remain unclear.     

Aggressive skin allograft rejection in CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway.

CD28-/- mice have been utilized to study the role of B7/CD28 and B7-CTLA4 interactions. There is evidence that CTLA4 ligation may be critical for tolerance induction. The aim of the current study is to further investigate rejection responses of CD28-/- mice and to define the role of B7-CTLA4 interactions in the absence of the CD40 and CD28 pathways. Balb/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 (B6) wild type or CD28-/- mice treated with anti-CD40L, CTLA4-Ig, or combination blockade. To investigate the cellular mechanism of rejection in CD28-/- recipients, mice were treated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibodies prior to treatment with costimulation blockade. The fluoroscein dye CFSE was utilized to study T cell expansion in vivo. Surprisingly, treatment of B6 CD28-/- mice with CTLA4-Ig alone (MST 12d), anti-CD40L alone (MST 13d), or combined blockade (MST 13d) had no effect on allograft survival compared to untreated B6 CD28 mice (MST 11d). CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD4+ cells and treated with CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD40L, or combination blockade also did not have prolonged survival compared with untreated mice (MST 10d). In contrast, CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD8+ cells had markedly prolonged allograft survival when treated with either anti-CD40L alone (MST 49d) or with combination blockade (MST 57d). Studies utilizing CFSE demonstrated that CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are not defective in in vivo proliferation responses compared with wild type CD8 cells. Thus, CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are responsible for aggressive rejection responses of CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40 pathway. In addition, CD40L blockade does not result in CD4+ T cell tolerance in CD28 recipients, despite an intact B7-CTLA4 pathway.     

Evidence for tissue-directed immune responses: analysis of CD4- and CD8-dependent alloimmunity

BACKGROUND: Transplant rejection has generally been considered a CD4 T-cell-dependent immune process. CD4-independent, CD8 T-cell rejection pathways have recently gained attention because of their relative resistance to immunosuppression. In the current study, the role of the allograft tissue in activation of these distinct pathways was examined by comparing host-immune responses with allogeneic pancreatic islets or hepatocytes transplanted across the same genetic disparity. METHODS: To compare activation of CD4-dependent versus CD8-dependent alloimmunity, islets or hepatocytes retrieved from FVB/N (H-2) mice were transplanted into CD8 or CD4 T-cell-reconstituted severe combined immunodeficiency mice, CD4 or CD8 knockout (KO) mice, and anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) or anti-CD8 mAb treated C57BL/6 mice (all H-2). The ability to immunomodulate CD4-dependent allograft rejection (in CD8 KO mice) was examined in the context of several mechanistically distinct immunotherapeutic strategies, including anti-CD4 mAb, donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 mAb, and anti-lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 mAb. RESULTS: The studies demonstrate that, whereas hepatocytes evoke alloreactive CD4-dependent and (CD4-independent) CD8 T-cell immune responses, allogeneic islets only activate CD4-dependent immune pathways. CD4-dependent host-immune responses initiated by pancreatic islet allografts were readily suppressed by a variety of short-term immunotherapies, whereas hepatocyte-initiated CD4-dependent alloimmune responses were not. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that immune characteristics of the specific allograft tissue uniquely influence the pattern of host immune responses such that the propensity to activate CD4- or CD8-dependent alloimmune responses can be distinguished. Furthermore, CD4-dependent immune responses activated by different tissues from the same donor strain are distinguished by their susceptibility to specific immunotherapy.