Long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to define the potential for long-term survival with severe left ventricular dysfunction after coronary bypass and to quantify any improvement in overall functional status. METHODS: Left ventricular dysfunction was confirmed preoperatively and the long-term survival and functional outcome after bypass was determined by follow-up studies obtained during the span of a decade. RESULTS: From 1/1990 to 12/1999, 86 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction, 0.18 +/- 0.03; range, 0.10 to 0.20) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. There were 10 perioperative deaths (11% mortality). The mean survival was 55 months (standard deviation +/- 34 months; range, 2 to 141 months) with an actual 5-year survival rate of 59% (actuarial 5-year 65%, 10-year 33%). Echocardiography obtained between 1 and 6 months, 6 months and 1 year, 1 and 2 years, 2 and 4 years, 4 and 6 years, and 6 and 11 years showed the ejection fraction improved to 0.29 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.001), 0.31 +/- 0.14 (p < 0.002), 0.35 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.001), 0.27 +/- 0.10 (p = 0.002), 0.36 +/- 0.14 (p = 0.004), and 0.30 +/- 0.11 (p = 0.004), respectively. At 1 to 6 months, 6 months to 1 year, and 1 to 2 years, the diastolic left ventricular dimension was unchanged, but the systolic left ventricular dimension decreased significantly from 5.02 +/- 0.77 cm to 4.26 +/- 0.91 cm (p = 0.046), 3.98 +/- 1.43 cm (p = 0.08), and 4.10 +/- 1.14 cm (p = 0.07). The preoperative New York Heart Association classification for all patients improved from 2.8 +/- 0.8 to 1.6 +/- 0.7 (p < 0.001) after a mean of 53 months (standard deviation +/- 34 months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction can derive long-term benefit from coronary bypass through improved left ventricular contractility as documented by a significantly decreased systolic left ventricular dimension and increased ejection fraction. Successful bypass is associated with a 59% actual 5-year survival rate and significantly improved New York Heart Association functional class.     

Outcomes and long-term quality of life of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery

Purpose  

The aim of this study was to identify determinants of long-term results after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in group of Iranian patients with systolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.     

左心室收缩功能低下冠心病病人冠状动脉旁路移植术的中远期效果

目的　总结并分析左心室收缩功能低下冠心病病人行冠状动脉旁路移植手术(CABG)的中、远期效果。方法　34例左心室射血分数(LVEF)低于0 30且不伴左心室室壁瘤的冠状动脉粥样硬化心脏病病人行CABG ,平均年龄(5 8 0±9 4 )岁。冠状动脉造影显示LVEF为0 15～0 30 ,平均0 2 7±0 0 4 ,其中2支病变3例,3支病变31例(包括左主干病变4例)。超声心动显示左心室舒张末直径(LVDD)平均为(6 1 5±8 9)mm ,LVEF平均0 2 8±0 0 7。心功能分级平均为2 9±0 7。体外循环下手术2 6例,非体外循环常温手术(OPCAB) 8例。每例旁路移植2～6支,平均(3 9±0 9)支。随访率94 1% ,随访时间平均(3 5±1 9)年。结果　无手术死亡。早期主要并发症为心功能不全。所有病人心绞痛症状明显减轻,左心室舒张末直径平均(5 5 2±7 1)mm ,LVEF平均0 4 7±0 11。心功能分级平均1 9±0 3。以上指标与术前进行统计学比较,差异均具统计学意义。随访3年生存率为91 9% ,5年生存率为85 7%。5年免除心绞痛为81 3% ,心功能分级为1～3级,平均1 4±0 6。结论　伴左心室收缩功能低下的CABG病人的中、远期疗效满意,充分的术前准备是手术成功关键。     

Precardiopulmonary bypass right ventricular function is associated with poor outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have an increased risk for morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the association of pre-CABG right ventricular (RV) function with outcome for patients with severe LVSD. We performed a retrospective evaluation of 41 patients with severe LVSD (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] < or =25%) scheduled for nonemergent CABG. Data were obtained from review of medical records, transesophageal echocardiography tapes, and phone interview. The pre- and post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) LVEF and the RV fractional area of contraction (RVFAC) were calculated by using intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Group 1 patients had an RVFAC < or =35% (n = 7), whereas Group 2 patients had RVFAC >35% (n = 34). The durations of mechanical ventilation and of intensive care unit and hospital stays are presented as the median. Pre-CABG LVEF was similar between Groups 1 and 2 (15.8% +/- 3.3% versus 17.8% +/- 3.9%). Compared with Group 2, Group 1 patients required greater duration of mechanical ventilation (12 days versus 1 day; P < 0.01), longer intensive care unit (14 versus 2 days; P < 0.01) and hospital (14 versus 7 days; P = 0.02) stays, had a more frequent incidence and severity of LV diastolic dysfunction, and had a smaller change in LVEF immediately after CPB (4.1% +/- 8.3% versus 12.5% +/- 9.2%; P = 0.03). All Group 1 patients died of cardiac causes within 2 yr of surgery; five died during the same hospital admission. Three Group 2 patients died: one of colon cancer at 18 mo after CABG and two of cardiac causes 24 and 48 mo after surgery. A fourth patient was awaiting cardiac transplantation 4 yr after surgery. The remaining Group 2 patients were New York Heart Association Classification I or II. For patients with severe LVSD undergoing CABG, pre-CPB RV dysfunction was associated with poor outcome. Patients with RVFAC >35% had a relatively uneventful perioperative course and good long-term survival, whereas patients with RVFAC < or =35% had a poor early and late outcome. Assessment of RV function is useful to further assess the risk of CABG. IMPLICATIONS: Right ventricular function before cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with poor outcome after coronary artery surgery in patients with poor left ventricular function.     

Predictors of early outcome after coronary artery surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The surgical survival in patients with severe myocardial dysfunction is critically dependent on the selection of patients. The present study was undertaken to identify the prognostic factors in such patients. METHODS: We analyzed the data of 176 consecutive patients (161 men, 15 women), aged 29 to 88 years (mean 58.43), with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. The LVEF ranged from 15% to 30% (mean 27.18%). Preoperatively, 33% had angina, 19.9% had recent myocardial infarction, and 21.6% had congestive heart failure. The mean number of grafts was 2.5/patient. The intra-aortic balloon was used prophylactically in 20.5% of patients and therapeutically in 4.0% of patients. RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 2.3%. The complications occurred as follows: perioperative myocardial infarction in two (1.1%), intractable ventricular arrhythmias in two (1.1%), prolonged ventilation in four (2.3%) and peritoneal dialysis in 1 (0.6%). The mean ICU and hospital stay were 2.46 +/- 0.76 and 7.57 +/- 2.24 days, respectively. The predictors of survival on univariate analysis were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (x2 = 14.458, p < 0.001), recent myocardial infarction (x2 = 5.852, p = 0.016), congestive heart failure (CHF) (x2 = 5.526, p = 0.019), and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) (x2 = 25.833, p < 0.001). However, on multivariate analysis, left ventricular end-systolic volume index was the only independent left ventricular function measurement predictive of survival (x2 = 10.228, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Left ventricular end-systolic volume index is the most important predictor of survival after coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with severe myocardial dysfunction.     

On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes

Background

We sought to evaluate the effects of on-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting techniques requiring cardioplegic arrest in patients with coronary artery disease with left ventricular dysfunction.

Methods

We report the early outcomes associated with survival, morbidity and improvement of left ventricular function in patients with low ejection fraction who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between August 2009 and June 2012. Patients were separated into 2 groups: group I underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting and group II underwent an on-pump beating-heart technique without cardioplegic arrest.

Results

In all, 131 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting: 66 in group I and 65 in group II. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 26.6% ± 3.5% in group I and 27.7% ± 4.7% in group II. Left ventricular end diastolic diameter was 65.6 ± 3.6 mm in group I and 64.1 ± 3.2 mm in group II. There was a significant reduction in mortality in the conventional and on-pump beating-heart groups (p < 0.001). Perioperative myocardial infarction and low cardiac output syndrome were higher in group I than group II (both p < 0.05). Improvement of left ventricular function after the surgical procedure was better in group II than group I.

Conclusion

The on-pump beating-heart technique is the preferred method for myocardial revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. This technique may be an acceptable alternative to the conventional technique owing to lower postoperative mortality and morbidity.     

Early and midterm clinical outcome in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing coronary artery surgery are at increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The present study investigated early and midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of patients with severe LV dysfunction undergoing coronary surgery at our institution. METHODS: Data on 5,195 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone (in-hospital mortality 1.35%) from April 1996 to August 2002 were prospectively recorded in the Patient Analysis and Tracking System. Two hundred and fifty patients (median age 65 years [interquartile range, 57 to 70]) with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% (74 off pump; 29.6%) were identified and early and midterm clinical outcomes analyzed. Propensity scores were used to take account of the imbalance in the distribution of prognostic factors between the on-pump and off-pump groups. RESULTS: Patients undergoing on-pump surgery were less likely to have current congestive heart failure, insulin-dependent diabetes, a history of hypertension, have had gastrointestinal tract surgery or an ulcer, or unstable angina. They had on average lower Parsonnet scores and New York Heart Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Score ratings. However they were more likely to have more extensive coronary artery heart disease and to require more grafts than those undergoing off-pump surgery. After adjustment for consultant team and propensity scores no differences between groups with regard to in-hospital mortality and morbidity were found. The only in-hospital outcome to show a significant difference after adjustment was the need for intraoperative inotropic support, which was higher in the on-pump group (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval 2.55 to 10.2; p < 0.001)). The median follow-up times for the on- and off-pump groups were 3.4 years and 1.4 years respectively. Three-year survival was higher with on-pump surgery (87% on-pump versus 73% off-pump) but this difference did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for prognostic variables (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.26, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients presenting with severe LV dysfunction is low with comparable results with both on- and off-pump coronary artery surgery. Midterm clinical outcome is encouraging and seems to justify surgical revascularization for this high-risk group of patients.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction

Objective  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is known to preserve left ventricular function better than conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CCAB). This study was carried out to investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction. Methods  Three hundred and eighty eight consecutive patients with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 39% who underwent CABG between January 2001 through October 2007 were included in this retrospective study. Two hundred and eleven patients were operated by off-pump technique (group 1) and 178 patients were operated by on-pump technique (CCAB) (group 2). The postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Of these, 204 (52.57%) patients were diabetics, 355 (91.49%) patients had documented prior myocardial infarction, 316 (81.44%) patients were in canadian cardiovascular society(CCS) class III and 47 (12.11%) patients were in CCS class IV. Results  There was no significant difference in the number of grafts per patient between the two groups [group 1 3.02 ± 0.76 vs group 2 3.18 ± 0.72 (P=0.07) and the index of completeness of revascularization was comparable [1.08 ± 0.08) (OPCAB) vs 1.04 ± 0.06 (CCAB) (p=0.52)] The left internal thoracic artery was anastomosed to left anterior descending artery in 98% of patients. Operative mortality was 2.8% (6 deaths) following OPCAB and 3.93% (7 deaths) following CCAB (p=0746). Postoperative usage of IABP support was higher in CCAB group (12 patients vs 4 patients: P<0.03) and usage of moderate or higher doses of inotropic support was also higher in the conventional group (p<0.0006). More worsening of preexisting renal insufficiency was observed in CCAB group (p=0.01) and no significant difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation was observed between the groups. Conclusions  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible and safe in patients with depressed left ventricular function and the postoperative morbidity was less in OPCAB group compared to on-pump group.     

Long-term survival and functional recovery after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Objective  Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left ventricular dysfunction has been considered to be a challenging operation. We assessed the early angiographic and long-term clinical and functional outcomes of patients with poor left ventricular function who underwent isolated CABG. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed the records of 78 patients with a poor left ventricular ejection fraction (35% or less) who underwent isolated CABG between January 1991 and November 2006. The mean age of the patients was 66.1 ± 9.4 years, and their mean New York Heart Association functional class was 3.1 ± 0.8. Their mean end-diastolic left ventricular diameter was 57.4 ± 8.1 mm, and their mean grade of mitral regurgitation was 0.7 ± 1.0. Early postoperative angiograms were performed at 32.5 ± 33.5 days after the operation. Interval echocardiographic data were analyzed, and the long-term survival rate was evaluated. Results  The average number of distal anastomoses per patient was 3.2 ± 1.1. The operative mortality rate was 7.7%. Stroke occurred in 1.3% of patients. The overall patency rates for arterial and venous grafts were 100% and 97.2%, respectively. The left ventricular ejection fraction significantly improved from 28.2% ± 5.1% to 34.4% ± 8.4%. Both the end-diastolic and end-systolic left ventricular dimensions significantly decreased from 57.4 ± 8.1 to 55.1 ± 8.8 mm and from 47.4 ± 8.4 to 45.1 ± 9.7 mm, respectively. The actuarial patient survival rate at 10 years was 73.1%. Conclusion  CABG in patients with left ventricular dysfunction was effective, with favorable early graft patency rates. The long-term outcome was also acceptable, with echocardiographic functional recovery.     

Is the outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery predictable in patients with severe ventricular function impairment?

Sixty consecutive patients, with a mean ejection fraction of 31.8% underwent coronary revascularization at the K. U. Leuven (Belgium). The operative mortality was 6%. At twelve months after surgery, the total actuarial survival was 90.0%, at twenty four months the total survival was down to 77.9%. All the preoperative data were entered into a mathematical model and using the stepwise logistic regression method, the predictability of death at 18 months postoperatively was analyzed. Using only the ejection fraction the accuracy of the prediction was 83.3%, the sensitivity 36.4% and the specificity 93.9%. Combining ejection fraction and NYHA functional classification before surgery the accuracy increased to 91.7%, the sensitivity to 72.7% and the specificity to 95.9%. Ejection fraction alone is a poor predictor of late death with only 36.4% sensitivity, but combining it with other parameters it is possible to construct a formula predicting death at 18 months with an accuracy of 91.7%.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in the left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to report our experience in off-pump coronary artery surgery in patients who have left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery was performed to 48 patients who were chosen randomly among 265 patients having two or more coronary artery disease and whose ejection fraction (EF) was less than 30%. In these patients fractioned shortening (FS) was evaluated by echocardiography, EF with multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) and ischaemic regions with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy both pre- and postoperatively. Coronary artery angiography was done to all patients at the end of the 1st year and patients were evaluated according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. RESULTS: There were three deaths. The clinical situations of 41 of 45 patients (91.1%) improved after the operation. These four patients who didn't improve in NYHA status were the ones in whom complete revascularization couldn't be done. The FS and EF values were significantly increased at the 1st month, and 1st year. The constant perfusion defects and irreversible damaged areas changed into dynamic myocardial tissue in the 1st year scintigraphies. DISCUSSION: Off-pump CABG can be done with an acceptable mortality and clinic results in patients who have ventricular dysfunction.     

Non-cardioplegic coronary surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Although most surgeons use cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), some still use non-cardioplegic methods with very good early and long-term outcome. However, the results in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction remain unproved. This study evaluates the perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction submitted to CABG using non-cardioplegic methods. METHODS: From April 1990 through December 1997, 3,180 patients were consecutively subjected to isolated CABG using non-cardioplegic methods, for construction of the distal anastomoses. This prospective study is based on the 107 (3.4%) patients with severe impairment of the left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 30%). The mean age at operation was 57.0 +/- 9.2 years and 95.3% of patients were male. Fifty three patients (49.5%) were in class CCS III/IV and 12 (11.2%) were subjected to urgent surgery. A history of previous myocardial infarction was recorded in 99 (92.5%) patients. Ninety seven (90.6%) patients had triple vessel and 17 (15.9%) left main stem disease, and 77 (71.9%) had a left ventricular end-diastolic pressure > 20 mmHg. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 73.1 +/- 21.7 min. The mean number of grafts per patient was 3.2. At least one internal mammary artery was used in all cases and 16 patients (14.9%) had bilateral internal mammary artery grafts (1.2 arterial grafts/patient). Endarterectomies were performed in 23 (21.5%) patients. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 2.8% (respiratory-1; cardiac-2). Forty one (38.3%) patients required inotropes, but for longer than 24 h in only 12 (11.2%), and two (1.9%) needed intra-aortic counterpulsation. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 2.8%. Two (1.9%) patients had reintervention for haemorrhage and another five (4.6%) for sternal complications. The incidences of supraventricular arrhythmias, renal failure and cerebrovascular accident were 16.8%, 3.6% and 2.8%, respectively. The mean time of hospital stay was 9.3 +/- 6.4 days. CONCLUSION: These results appear to demonstrate that non-cardioplegic methods afford good myocardial protection and operating conditions with excellent applicability, even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.     

冠状动脉旁路移植术后病人生存质量探讨

目的观察研究冠状动脉旁路移植（CABG）术病人术前、术后生存质量（QoL）。方法分为体外循环手术组（ONCAB）和非体外循环手术（OPCAB）组，于手术前1周内、术后3个月和6个月进行西雅图心绞痛调查表（SAQ）和SF-36量表的测评。结果SAQ各项内容评分，术前以心绞痛稳定状态（AS）得分最低，术后各项目有明显好转；SF-36的生理健康内容（PCS）和心理健康内容（MCS）在术后均有不同程度改善；ONCAB和OPCAB两组之间各纬度得分在术后3．6个月比较差异均无统计学意义。结论冠状动脉旁路移植术后病人生活质量提高。ONCAB和OPCAB组生存质量比较差异无统计学意义。