Establishment of a human malignant fibrous histiocytoma cell line, COMA. Characterization By conventional cytogenetics, comparative genomic hybridization, and multiplex fluorescence In situ hybridization

The human COMA cell line has been established from a storiform pleomorphic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). As expected for this tumor type, a very complex karyotype was observed after R-banding analysis. An extensive analysis by 24-color painting, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed. Twelve complex marker chromosomes recurrently observed were clearly identified; among them, three were systematically present in all analyzed metaphases. Amplifications detected by CGH were refined by FISH with probes specific for various candidate loci. A significant aneuploidy and numerous micronuclei were observed, which could be related to the anomalies of centriole numbers detected in a proportion of cells. Such an analysis, performed on a series of MFH cell lines, would allow the delineation of the genomic alterations specific for the oncogenesis or progression of this complex tumor type or both.     

Analysis of ameloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization

In order to characterize the chromosomal alterations in ameloblastomas, a combination of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques was performed on 9 tumors. Chromosomal alterations including a gain at 1q and losses at 1pter, 10q, and 22q could be detected by CGH only in 1 tumor. Interphase FISH analysis, using centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 10, and 22 as well as region-specific probes for 1p36 and 10q26, revealed the most frequent alterations to exist in the tumor with the abnormal CGH profile. These alterations included marked to slight increases of monosomic cells for chromosome 10 (91.5%), 10q26 (35.8%), 1p36 (24.4%), and chromosome 22 (18.8%), as well as significant elevations of trisomic cells for chromosome 1 (41.2%). Moreover, FISH analysis revealed a frequent loss of chromosome 22 in all tumors examined, except for one lesion, indicating that loss of the entire or a part of this chromosome is a common event in ameloblastomas, possibly being a predisposing factor to ameloblastoma tumorigenesis.     

Importance of using comparative genomic hybridization to improve detection of chromosomal changes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

We used comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and conventional cytogenetics (CC) to define chromosomal changes and to evaluate the usefulness of CGH in 65 patients having childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Subsequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to evaluate the CGH and cytogenetic results. Comparative genomic hybridization revealed DNA copy number changes in 49 (75%) patients (including 7 patients with unsuccessful cytogenetics and 2 patients with normal karyotype). A total of 85 losses and 195 gains were detected. The most commonly gained chromosomes were 21 (35%), X (31%), 18 (27%), 10 (26%), 6 (25%), 17 (25%), 4 (23%), and 14 (22%). Losses were most frequently observed on chromosomes 9p (18%) and 12p (11%). Other losses were detected on chromosomes 13q (9%), 6q (9%), 7p (8%), and chromosome X (6%). Conventional cytogenetics revealed chromosomal changes in 53 (82%) patients. The employment of CGH and FISH together with CC analysis revealed chromosomal changes in 62 (95%) of the childhood ALL patients investigated. The CGH completed CC results in 36 patients; in 9 patients, the changes escaped detection without using CGH. The results of our study were compared to 6 other CGH studies previously reported. Our observations underline the benefits of supplementing routine cytogenetic investigation in childhood ALL by FISH and CGH, because small unbalanced changes may escape detection when conventional cytogenetics is the only diagnostic method used.     

Cytogenetic aberrations in myelodysplastic syndrome detected by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Conventional cytogenetics (CC) is proven as a diagnostic and prognostic factor in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, CC may be hampered by insufficient metaphase preparation and cannot analyze interphase nuclei. These problems are solved by using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The CGH was applied to samples from 45 patients with MDS, and the results were compared with CC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The CC detected aberrations in 12 of 45 samples, including chromosomes 3 (n = 1), 5 (n = 9), 7 (n = 2),8(n = 1), 18(n = 1),21 (n = 1), X (n = 1), and Y(n = 2). In one patient, loss of B and C group chromosomes and a marker chromosome were seen. The CGH revealed chromosomal imbalances in 18 of 45 samples, including chromosomes 5 (n = 11), 7 (n = 2), 8 (n = 1), 18(n = 1), 20(n = 1), 21 (n = 1), X (n = 1), and Y (n = 2). All unbalanced aberrations found by CC were detected by CGH, too. In two patients, the CGH found additional aberrations and redefined the aberrations of the chromosomes of the B and C group in one sample. The FISH confirmed these aberrations. Additionally performed FISH for chromosomes 5, 7, and 8 gave normal findings in all patients found to be normal in CC and CGH. The CGH and FISH confirmed the results obtained by CC. All three techniques showed changes of chromosomes 5 and 7 as the most frequent aberrations, emphasizing the importance of these chromosomes in the development of MDS. Furthermore, the CC is proven as the basic technique for cytogenetic evaluation of MDS.     

Analysis of selected oncogenes (AKT1, FOS, BCL2L2, TGFbeta) on chromosome 14 in granulosa cell tumors (GCTs): a comprehensive study on 30 GCTs combining comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence-in situ-hybridization (FISH)

In previous studies, we have demonstrated a number of cytogenetic alterations in granulosa cell tumors (GCTs), especially on chromosomes X, 12, 14, and 22. However, little is known about specific loci on 14q, which could play an important role in tumor pathology. Therefore, we assessed four important genes in 30 GCTs using fluorescence-in situ-hybridization (FISH). Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed on paraffin-embedded material. Then, we applied FISH with gene-specific DNA probes for AKT1 (14q32.32), FOS (14q24.3), BCL2L2 (14q11.2-q12), and TGFbeta3 (14q24), and tried to find a correlation between CGH, FISH, tumor stage, and survival. In CGH, 7 of 30 cases (23.3%) showed complete gains on chromosome 14. FISH of the four loci revealed gains of hybridization signals in 8 of 30 cases (26.6%), indicating trisomy of the whole chromosome arm. The same aberration was detected by FISH in 2 of 30 cases (6.6%), which were negative using CGH. One case (1 of 30; 3.3%) was found to have a gain on chromosome 14 by CGH, which could not be confirmed by FISH. A correlation with tumor stage or survival could not be established. Our results suggest that GCTs may be characterized by trisomy of chromosome 14. A specific oncogene that could play a particular role in the tumorigenesis of GCTs was not identified on chromosome 14.     

Supernumerary ring chromosome in a Bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) is composed of interspersed sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22: a fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization analysis

Cytogenetic analysis of Bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) has not been reported previously. Here, we report the identification of a supernumerary ring chromosome in a Bednar tumor by chromosome painting with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Chromosome painting with FISH demonstrated that the supernumerary ring chromosome was composed of discontinuous, interwoven sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22. Amplification of chromosomes 17 and 22 sequences was confirmed by CGH. These results indicate that Bednar tumor and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans are characterized by the same chromosomal features. To our knowledge, this is the first report that the ring chromosome in Bednar tumor is composed of amplified material from chromosomes 17 and 22.     

Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis

BACKGROUND: The object of this study was to determine the mechanisms that produce aneuploidy in oocytes and establish which chromosomes are more prone to aneuploidy. METHODS: A total of 54 oocytes from 36 women were analysed. The whole chromosome complement of the first polar body (1PB) was analysed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), while the corresponding metaphase II (MII) oocyte was analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to confirm the results. RESULTS: Matched CGH-FISH results were obtained in 42 1PB-MII doublets, of which 37 (88.1%) showed reciprocal results. The aneuploidy rate was 57.1%. Two-thirds of the aneuploidy events were chromatid abnormalities. Interestingly, the chromosomes more frequently involved in aneuploidy were chromosomes 1, 4 and 22 followed by chromosome 16. In general, small chromosomes (those equal to or smaller in size than chromosome 13) were more prone to aneuploidy (chi2-test, P=0.07); 25% of the aneuploid doublets would have been misdiagnosed as normal using FISH with probes for nine-chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of two different techniques, CGH and FISH, for the study of 1PB and MII allowed the identification and confirmation of any numerical chromosome abnormality, as well as helping to determine the mechanisms involved in the genesis of maternal aneuploidy.     

Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) using FISH to analyze up to nine chromosomes to discard chromosomally abnormal embryos has resulted in an increase of pregnancy rates in certain groups of patients. However, the number of chromosomes that can be analyzed is a clear limitation. We evaluate the reliability of using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to detect the whole set of chromosomes, as an alternative to PGD using FISH. METHODS AND RESULTS: We have analysed by CGH both, first polar bodies (1PBs) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes from 30 oocytes donated by 24 women. The aneuploidy rate was 48%. Considering two maternal age groups, a higher number of chromosome abnormalities were detected in the older group of oocytes (23% versus 75%, P < 0.02). About 33% of the 1PB-MII oocyte doublets diagnosed as aneuploid by CGH would have been misdiagnosed as normal if FISH with nine chromosome probes had been used. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the reliability of 1PB analysis by CGH, to detect almost any chromosome abnormality in oocytes as well as unbalanced segregations of maternal translocations in a time frame compatible with regular in vitro fertilization (IVF). The selection of euploid oocytes could help to increase implantation and pregnancy rates of patients undergoing IVF treatment.     

Sequence-based design of single-copy genomic DNA probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization

Chromosomal rearrangements are frequently monitored by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using large, recombinant DNA probes consisting of contiguous genomic intervals that are often distant from disease loci. We developed smaller, targeted, single-copy probes directly from the human genome sequence. These single-copy FISH (scFISH) probes were designed by computational sequence analysis of approximately 100-kb genomic sequences. ScFISH probes are produced by long PCR, then purified, labeled, and hybridized individually or in combination to human chromosomes. Preannealing or blocking with unlabeled, repetitive DNA is unnecessary, as scFISH probes lack repetitive DNA sequences. The hybridization results are analogous to conventional FISH, except that shorter probes can be readily visualized. Combinations of probes from the same region gave single hybridization signals on metaphase chromosomes. ScFISH probes are produced directly from genomic DNA, and thus more quickly than by recombinant DNA techniques. We developed single-copy probes for three chromosomal regions-the CDC2L1 (chromosome 1p36), MAGEL2 (chromosome 15q11.2), and HIRA (chromosome 22q11.2) genes-and show their utility for FISH. The smallest probe tested was 2290 bp in length. To assess the potential utility of scFISH for high-resolution analysis, we determined chromosomal distributions of such probes. Single-copy intervals of this length or greater are separated by an average of 29.2 and 22.3 kb on chromosomes 21 and 22, respectively. This indicates that abnormalities seen on metaphase chromosomes could be characterized with scFISH probes at a resolution greater than previously possible.     

The application of comparative genomic hybridization as an additional tool in the chromosome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) there are frequently complex karyotypes with multiple structurally altered chromosomes, many of which are marker chromosomes of unknown origin. The aim of this study was to apply comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to cases of AML or MDS in transformation submitted for routine cytogenetic analysis to investigate whether this approach would yield any further information and, if possible, to predict which cases would benefit from CGH analysis. Nineteen cases with AML or MDS in transformation were analyzed. CGH revealed nine cases with gains or losses of chromosomal material. In six of these cases the chromosomal location of this material was not apparent from cytogenetic analysis especially when multiple markers were present. By using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific libraries for the chromosome regions that showed discordance between CGH and conventional cytogenetics, we were able to identify the chromosome location of material within the karyotype. In this group of six patients, four cases of an unbalanced translocation involving regions of chromosomes 5 and 17 were characterized. Three of these cases had additional abnormalities, including two cases with regions of amplification in which oncogenes are located (MYC, MLL) and one case with a dic(7;21)(p10;p10). In all six cases it was possible to characterize complex chromosomal aberrations such as derivative chromosomes, marker chromosomes, and ring chromosomes. This study demonstrates that CGH can detect true gain and loss of critical chromosome regions more accurately than conventional karyotyping in cases with very complex karyotypes, and can thus prove useful in predicting prognosis and pinpointing areas of the genome that require further study. Also, CGH can be a useful technique to identify the origin of marker chromosomes, and it can assist in choice of probes for confirmatory FISH, when there is no clue provided from the analysis of G-banded chromosomes.     

The application of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization to the characterization of genotoxicity screening tester strains AHH-1 and MCL-5.

AHH-1 TK+/- is a human B cell-derived lymphoblastoid cell line that constitutively expresses a high level of the cytochrome CYP1A1. The MCL-5 cell line was developed by transfection of AHH-1 with cDNAs encoding the human cytochrome P450s, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 and microsomal epoxide hydrolase carried in plasmids. The metabolic components of these cell lines make them a useful screening tool for use in mutagenicity studies. Although AHH-1 and MCL-5 are closely related, the two cell lines show differences which cannot be attributed to transfection. In the present study both cell lines were investigated for chromosome stability by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using whole chromosome probes and telomeric probes. Amplification in chromosomes 4q, 3q and 9p was observed in both cell lines. To compare the cell lines directly, AHH-1 and MCL-5 DNAs were co-hybridized on the same metaphases using a modified CGH technique. The only difference observed between AHH-1 and MCL-5 was the degree of amplification involving the subtelomeric region of chromosome 4; the additional telomeric region (4q) was translocated onto chromosome 11 and/or chromosome X. FISH was use to show the presence of isochromosomes 3q and 9p in both cell lines with a chromosome number of 48 or higher. These data demonstrate that CGH and FISH with chromosome-specific probes are able to resolve complex karyotypes and to highlight subchromosomal regions involved in rearrangements and potential chromosome fragile sites. Analyses such as those described here may be of considerable value in the determination of the stability of a variety of the cell lines used in the mutagenicity testing of chemicals.     

The Art and Applications of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Endocrine Pathology

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or molecular cytogenetics is currently recognized as a reliable, sensitive, and reproducible technique for identifying the copy number and structure of chromosomes. FISH combines molecular genetics with classic cytogenetics and allows simultaneous morphologic evaluation on a single slide. Centromeric DNA probes are used to detect specific chromosomes and telomeric probes to demonstrate all chromosomes. Sequence-specific probes can localize in situ a single gene copy on a specific chromosome locus. FISH allows cytogenetic investigation of metaphase spreads and interphase nuclei. Several protocols have been proposed to analyze preparations from fresh samples or archival material. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a novel cytogenetic technique, which combines FISH with automatic digital image analysis. Comparative analysis of the hybridization products of tumor DNA and reference DNA with normal metaphase chromosomes, each labeled with color different fluorochrome, can retrieve chromosomal imbalances of the entire genome in a single experiment. FISH and CGH are powerful morphologic tools in understanding physiologic mechanisms and in resolving problems of the pathogenesis of several diseases. These techniques shed light on the cytogenetic background in many endocrinological disorders, providing a better understanding of the activities and alterations of endocrine cell function.     

Significant hybridization differences in comparative genomic hybridization due to nucleotides used for DNA labelling and to DNA chosen for cohybridization.

OBJECTIVE: Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been established as an informative technique in genetic analysis. However, differences in the ratio of hybridization intensities were reported for particular chromosomes, which may affect CGH results. The aim of this study was to define these differences in more detail. For this purpose, CGH results of 70 samples of bone marrow cells (BMC) with normal karyotype in conventional cytogenetics (CC) were evaluated using seven different reference DNAs and two different DNA labeling systems. METHODS AND RESULTS: CGH using fluorochrome-conjugated nucleotides for DNA labeling indicated signal deviations in 21/70 BMC samples. Deviations affected chromosomes 1 (n = 21), 2 (n = 11), 4 (n = 11), 5 (n = 9), 6 (n = 7), 7 (n = 2), 8 (n = 2), 12 (n = 5), 13 (n = 15), 14 (n = 1), 16 (n = 17), 17 (n = 11), 19 (n = 21), 20 (n = 12), and/or 22 (n = 17). None of the imbalances were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Using digoxigenin and biotin-conjugated nucleotides in exemplary cases (n = 5) led to the disappearance of the signal deviations. Repeated CGH experiments using seven different reference DNAs showed remarkable variations in the signal deviations. CONCLUSION: Hybridization differences depend not only on the hapten or fluorochrome-labeled nucleotides used for DNA labeling, but also on the reference DNA chosen. Therefore, close control of CGH experiments is mandatory, and additional techniques such as FISH should be performed to confirm the results obtained by CGH.     

Characterization of complex chromosomal abnormalities in uveal melanoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization, spectral karyotyping, and comparative genomic hybridization

Several nonrandom recurrent chromosomal changes are observed in uveal melanoma. Some of these abnormalities, e.g., loss of chromosome 3, gain of the q arm of chromosome 8, and chromosome 6 abnormalities, are of prognostic value. Cytogenetic analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are used to detect these changes. In some cases, however, detailed cytogenetic analysis is not possible due to the presence of complex abnormalities. To define more accurately these cytogenetic changes, we have applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and/or spectral karyotyping (SKY) to two uveal melanoma cell lines and five primary uveal melanomas, with partially defined and/or complex abnormalities. SKY provided additional information on 34/39 partially defined aberrant chromosomes and revealed a new abnormality, a der(17)t(7;17)(?;q?), that had not been recognized by conventional cytogenetics. Additionally, using SKY, abnormalities involving chromosome 6 or 8 were found to be twice as common as observed with cytogenetic analysis. CGH was especially useful in assigning the abnormalities identified by SKY to specific chromosomal regions and, in addition, resulted in the detection of a small deletion of chromosome region 3q13 approximately 21. We conclude that SKY and CGH, as methods complementary to cytogenetic and FISH analysis, provide more complete information on the chromosomal abnormalities occurring in uveal melanoma.     

Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics

The quality of cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours has greatly improved in the past decade, but a number of technical difficulties remain which limit the characterization of solid tumour chromosomes by conventional cytogenetics alone. The identification of regions of chromosomal abnormality has been aided by the introduction of molecular cytogenetic techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of these, a recently developed approach, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), has had a particular impact on the cytogenetic analysis of solid tumours. It incorporates the sensitivity of in situ techniques and overcomes many of the drawbacks of conventional cytogenetic analysis. This review first outlines the CGH method, giving details for the preparation of DNA probes and target human metaphase chromosomes together with information on the in situ technique and data handling criteria used in our laboratory. It then presents an overview of some of the current applications of CGH, together with a discussion of future directions in the field. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Centralization errors in comparative genomic hybridization array analysis of pituitary tumor samples

Reliable interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH) results requires centralization and normalization of the data. We evaluated the reliability of aCGH centralization by comparing aCGH results (with classical centralization‐normalization steps) to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results. In addition, we propose a method to correct centralization bias. Sixty‐six pituitary tumors were analyzed (Agilent aCGH + SNP 4 × 180K microarray). For each tumor, the FISH‐based log₂(ratios) of a subset of chromosomes were compared with the corresponding aCGH raw log₂(ratios). With our new normalization‐centralization process, this difference was added to all log₂(ratios), before performing loess regression on non‐altered probes only. Finally, the mean log₂(ratio) and the percentage of normal probes were compared between CGHnormaliter and our new FISH‐based method. For 11 tumors, FISH results and raw CGH log₂(ratios) differed significantly. In addition, nine tumors showed discrepancies between results generated by CGHnormaliter and our new‐method. Such discrepancies seemed to occur with tumours with many abnormalities (0%‐40% normal probes), rather than in those tumours with fewer abnormalities (31%‐100% normal probes). Five tumors had too few normal probes to allow normalization. In these tumors, which can exhibit many changes in DNA copy number, we found that centralization bias was frequent and uncorrected by current normalization methods. Therefore, an external control for centralization, such as FISH analysis, is required to insure reliable interpretation of aCGH data.     

Low frequency of chromosomal imbalances in anaplastic ependymomas as detected by comparative genomic hybridization

We screened 26 ependymomas in 22 patients (7 WHO grade I, myxopapillary, myE; 6 WHO grade II, E; 13 WHO grade III, anaplastic, aE) using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). 25 out of 26 tumors showed chromosomal imbalances on CGH analysis. The chromosomal region most frequently affected by losses of genomic material clustered on 13q (9/26). 6/7 myE showed a loss on 13q14-q31. Other chromosomes affected by genomic losses were 6q (5/26), 4q (5/26), 10 (5/26), and 2q (4/26). The most consistent chromosomal abnormality in ependymomas so far reported, is monosomy 22 or structural abnormality 22q, identified in approximately one third of Giemsa-banded cases with abnormal karyotypes. Using FISH, loss or monosomy 22q was detected in small subpopulations of tumor cells in 36% of cases. The most frequent gains involved chromosome arms 17 (8/26), 9q (7/26), 20q (7/26), and 22q (6/26). Gains on 1q were found exclusively in pediatric ependymomas (5/10). Using FISH, MYCN proto-oncogene DNA amplifications mapped to 2p23-p24 were found in 2 spinal ependymomas of adults. On average, myE demonstrated 9.14, E 5.33, and aE 1.77 gains and/or losses on different chromosomes per tumor using CGH. Thus, and quite paradoxically, in ependymomas, a high frequency of imbalanced chromosomal regions as revealed by CGH does not indicate a high WHO grade of the tumor but is more frequent in grade I tumors.     

Chromosome arm 20q gains and other genomic alterations in colorectal cancer metastatic to liver, as analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Comprehensive information about the molecular cytogenetic changes in metastases of colorectal cancer is not yet available. To define such changes in metastases, we measured relative DNA sequence copy numbers by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Samples from 27 liver metastases and 6 synchronous primary tumors were analyzed. An average of 9.9 aberrations per tumor was found in the metastases. Gains of chromosome arms 20q (85%), 13q (48%), 7p (44%), and 8q (44%) and losses of chromosome arms 18q (89%), 8p (59%), 1p (56%), and 18p (48%) were detected most frequently. Chromosomes 14 and 15 were lost in 26% and 30% of the metastases, respectively. No consistent differences were observed between primary tumors and synchronous metastases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used for further characterization of gains of chromosome arm 20q. Touch preparations of 13 tumors that had demonstrated 20q gain with CGH were examined with FISH by use of a set of probes mapping to different parts of 20q. A probe for 20p was used as a reference. FISH showed relative gain of at least one 20q locus in 12 of the tumors. High-level gains were detected in 38% of the tumors, preferentially for probes mapping to band 20q13. Our CGH data indicate that colorectal metastases show chromosomal changes similar to those that have been reported for primary tumors. Chromosomal losses were seen at higher frequency, particularly for chromosomes 14 and 15. By FISH, we identified subregions on chromosome arm 20q that are frequently involved in DNA amplifications in colorectal cancer and that may harbor candidate proto-oncogenes.     

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization

Numerical chromosome errors are known to be common in early human embryos and probably make a significant contribution to early pregnancy loss and implantation failure in IVF patients. Over recent years fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to document embryonic aneuploidies. Many IVF laboratories perform preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with FISH to select embryos that are free from some aneuploidies in an attempt to improve implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates in particular categories of IVF patients. The usefulness of FISH is limited because only a few chromosomes can be detected simultaneously in a single biopsied cell. Complete karyotyping at the single cell level can now be achieved by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). CGH enables not only enumeration of all chromosomes but gives a more complete picture of the entire length of each chromosome and has demonstrated that chromosomal breakages and partial aneuploidies exist in embryos. CGH has provided invaluable information about the extent of mosaicism and aneuploidy of all chromosomes in early human conceptuses. CGH has been applied to clinical PGD and has resulted in the birth of healthy babies from embryos whose full karyotype was determined in the preimplantation phase.     

Genetic abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization in a human endometriosis-derived cell line

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used in parallel with fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and conventional karyotyping to perform a genome-wide survey of DNA gains and losses in the endometriosis-derived permanent cell line, FbEM-1. The cytogenetic analysis showed a complex karyotype with numerical changes and multiple chromosome aberrations, including the der(1) complement marker exhibiting a large homogenous staining region (HSR). The chromosomal rearrangement interpreted as der(5) t(5;6)(q34;p11) was found in the majority of the metaphases indicating a clonal abnormality. Repeated CGH experiments demonstrated over-representation of chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6p, 7, 16, 17q, 20, 21q and 22q, while chromosomes 6q, 9, 11p, 12, 13q, 18 and X were under-represented. Using DNA from the original endometriotic tissues, including a peritoneal implant and ovarian endometrioma, CGH analysis revealed loss of DNA copy number on 1p, 22q and chromosome X, while gain was found on chromosomal arms 6p and 17q. FISH analysis confirmed that the gain at 17q includes amplification of the proto-oncogene HER-2/neu in 16% of the FbEM-1 nuclei and in 12% of cells from the primary ovarian endometrioma tissue. These findings demonstrate that FbEM-1 cells share certain molecular cytogenetic features with the original tissue and suggest that chromosomal instability is important in the development of endometriosis.