Efficacy of quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication after failure of proton pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy in Singapore

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication is the mainstay in the treatment of H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease. Current standard eradication therapy consists of 1 week of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antibiotics selected from amoxicillin, metronidazole and clarithromycin. In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetra‐cycline and metronidazole in patients for whom initial H. pylori eradication using a triple therapy regimen consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin was unsuccessful. METHODS: Consecutive patients with H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease, in whom H. pylori with triple therapy had been unsuccessful, were included in the study. These patients had been treated with a regimen that included a PPI (standard dose twice daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) and clarithro­mycin (500 mg twice daily) for 1 week during 1997?2001. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease was made at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection was considered to be present on the basis of either a positive rapid urease test, positive histo­logical identification of H. pylori or both. Failure of initial H. pylori eradication was established with either a rapid urease test, a ¹³C urea breath test or histology. Quadruple therapy consisted of a PPI (standard dose twice daily), metronidazole (400 mg three times daily), tetracycline (500 mg four times daily) and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg twice daily). Failure of quadruple therapy was diagnosed on the basis of a positive ¹³C urea breath test. RESULTS: Fifty‐three patients received quadruple therapy. The median age was 52 years (range 20?74) and the male to female ratio was 42 : 11. On an intent‐to‐treat basis, the eradication rate was 69.8%, whereas on a per‐protocol basis, the eradication rate was 82.2%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a 1‐week quadruple therapy regime consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole was effective in 82.2% of patients who experienced an unsuccessful initial H. pylori eradication attempt with PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin.     

Sequential therapy achieves a higher eradication rate than standard triple therapy in Taiwan

Background and Aims: Most clinical trials concerning sequential therapy have been conducted in Italy. The efficacy of sequential therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in Asia remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of sequential therapy with standard triple therapy in Taiwan. Methods: From January 2005 to December 2009, 233 H. pylori‐infected patients receiving either a 10‐day sequential therapy (40 mg pantoprazole and 1 g amoxicillin, twice daily, for the initial 5 days, followed by 40 mg pantoprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 500 mg metronidazole, twice daily, for the subsequent 5 days, n = 118) or a 7‐day standard triple therapy (40 mg pantoprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin, and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 7 days, n = 115) were included in the retrospective study. All the patients underwent a follow‐up endoscopy with a rapid urease test and histological examination or a urea breath test at 8 weeks after the end of anti‐H. pylori therapy to assess H. pylori status. Result: Intention‐to‐treat analysis demonstrated a significantly higher eradication rate for the sequential group than for the triple group (93% vs 80%, respectively, P = 0.003). Per‐protocol analysis also showed similar results (93% vs 80%, P = 0.005). Both groups had similar frequencies of adverse events (29% vs 22%) and drug compliance (98% vs 97%). Conclusion: Sequential therapy achieves a higher eradication rate than standard triple therapy in Taiwan. The novel treatment can be used as a first‐line therapy for H. pylori infection for Taiwanese.     

Effect of pretreatment with Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2716 on first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

Background and Aim: Helicobacter pylori eradication clearly decreases peptic ulcer recurrence rates. H. pylori eradication is achieved in 70–90% of cases, but treatment failures due to poor patient compliance and resistant organisms do occur. Lactobacillus gasseri can suppress both clarithromycin‐susceptible and ‐resistant strains of H. pylori in vitro. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment with L. gasseri‐ containing yogurt on H. pylori eradication. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial in patients with H. pylori infection. Methods: A total of 229 patients were randomized into either a 1‐week triple therapy of rabeprazole (10 mg bid), amoxicillin (750 mg bid), and clarithromycin (200 mg bid) or triple therapy plus L. gasseri‐containing yogurt. In the yogurt‐plus‐triple therapy groups, yogurt containing L. gasseri OLL2716 (112 g) was given twice daily for 4 weeks (3 weeks pretreatment and also 1 week during eradication therapy). Clarithromycin resistance was determined by the detection of a mutation in 23S rRNA using nested polymerase chain reaction and the direct sequencing of DNA from pretreatment feces. H. pylori eradication was diagnosed based on the urea breath test and a stool antigen test after 8 weeks of eradication. Results: The status of H. pylori susceptibility to clarithromycin was successively determined in 188 out of 229 samples. The rate of infection with clarithromycin‐resistant strains of H. pylori was 27.1%. Overall eradication (intention to treat/per protocol) was 69.3/74.5% for the triple‐only group, and 82.6/85.6% for the yogurt‐plus‐triple group (P = 0.018/P = 0.041). Eradication of primary clarithromycin‐resistant strains tended to be higher for yogurt‐plus‐triple therapy than triple‐only therapy (38.5 vs 28.0%, respectively, P = 0.458). Conclusion: This study confirmed that the major cause of treatment failure is resistance to clarithromycin. A 4‐week treatment with L. gasseri‐containing yogurt improves the efficacy of triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of the efficacy of 1‐day high‐dose quadruple therapy versus 7‐day triple therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The proton pump inhibitor (PPI)‐based 7‐day triple therapy is the regimen with the highest cure rates for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and has been recommended as the first‐line regimen in the world. It had been reported that a 1‐day quadruple therapy could also successfully cure 95% of the H. pylori infected patients. OBJECTIVES: To observe the efficacy of 1‐day high‐dose quadruple therapy versus 7‐day triple therapy for treatment of H. pylori infection, and to observe side‐effects of the two different regimens. METHODS: This randomized, open, parallel‐controlled study was conducted at Renji Hospital between November 2004 to March 2005. A total of 80 consecutive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia, who were H. pylori positive proven by both rapid urease test and histology were included and randomly assigned to 1‐day quadruple therapy or 7‐day triple therapy. Thirty‐nine patients were administered with 1‐day high‐dose quadruple therapy including esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d., colloidal bismuth subcitrate 440 mg q.i.d., amoxicillin 2 g q.i.d. and metronidazole (400 mg q.i.d.) for 1 day. Forty‐one patients received a standard 7‐day triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 7 days. The eradication rates were evaluated by the ¹³C‐urea breath test at least 4 weeks after completion of a course treatment. RESULTS: Seventy‐seven patients completed the trial and three patients dropped out. The eradication rates in the 1‐day therapeutic group and the 7‐day therapeutic group were 39.5% (15/38) and 84.6% (33/39), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.0001). Short‐lasting and self‐limiting side effects including thirst, a metallic taste, diarrhea and abdominal pain were reported in three patients (7.9%) in the 1‐day group and seven patients (18%) in the 7‐day group (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: A 1‐day high‐dose quadruple therapy with amoxicillin, metronidazole, bismuth salt, and esomeprazole is not effective for eradication of H. pylori compared with the standard 7‐day triple therapy.     

Efficacy of Reduced Dosage of Rabeprazole in PPI/AC Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)- based triple therapy has been a recent trend for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, with the PPI–amoxicillin–clarithromycin (PPI/AC) regimen being one of the most popular. We have reported the effectiveness of PPI/AC regimens in the Japanese population and have demonstrated that the effectiveness of 40 mg rabeprazole, a recently developed PPI, is similar to that of 40 mg of omeprazole and 60 mg of lansoprazole when used in combination with amoxicillin and clarithromycin. In this study, we focused on whether 20 mg of rabeprazole is effective in our patient population by comparing that dosage with 40 mg of rabeprazole and 60 mg of lansoprazole. In all, 308 H. pylori-infected patients [236 men and 72 women; age (mean ± sem) 49.3 ± 0.6 years] with peptic ulcer disease (N = 270) or nonulcer dyspepsia (N = 38) were randomly assigned to one of three different PPI/AC regimens for seven days: LAC (N = 104), consisting of lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day, and clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; RAC (N = 104), consisting of rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day, and clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day; and the R1/2AC regimen (N = 100), which included rabeprazole 10 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 500 mg three times a day, and clarithromycin 200 mg twice a day. Cure of the infection was determined by the [¹³C]urea breath test one month after completion of the treatment. Intention-to-treat based and per-protocol based cure rates for the LAC, RAC, and R1/2AC regimens were 82.7 (95% CI, 74–89) and 88.7% (81–94), 85.6 (77–92) and 89.8% (82–95), and 87.0 (79–93) and 89.7% (82–95), respectively. Although adverse effects were reported by 20.3% of the patients, these affected compliance in only five patients in the RAC and LAC regimens and none in the R1/2AC group. Overall complete compliance was achieved in 94.7% of interviewed patients. In conclusion, the effectiveness of the PPI/AC regimen with 20 mg of rabeprazole is comparable with and even safer than that of 40 mg of rabeprazole and 60 mg of lansoprazole in our patient population.     

Sequential therapy in clarithromycin-sensitive and -resistant Helicobacter pylori based on polymerase chain reaction molecular test

Background and Aim: The present study was designed to determine the eradication rate of 10 day sequential therapy in genotypic clarithromycin‐resistant Helicobacter pylori group identified by molecular polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection in Thai patients. Methods: Between May 2007 and June 2010, patients who had undergone gastroscopic examination at the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, for dyspeptic symptoms were recruited. Two biopsy samples from gastric antrum were obtained, one for rapid urease test and another for PCR. PCR‐sequencing was performed to determine point mutations in 23S rRNA gene. Patients received 10 day sequential therapy consisting of lanzoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 5 days followed by lanzoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and nitroimidazole 500 mg twice daily for the remaining 5 days. Urea breath test (UBT) was performed to assess eradication therapy. Results: A total of 151 patients (mean age 52.7 years, 75 males and 76 females) were recruited in this study. All patients completed sequential therapy without significant side effects. Point mutations at A2143G and A2142G were detected in 17 patients (11.3%). Overall eradication rate was 94%. The eradication rate in the group with point mutation was significantly lower than the eradication rate in the group without point mutation (64.7% vs 97.8%; odds ratio = 19.6 and 95% confidence interval = 4.3–88.8; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Genotypic clarithromycin resistance was detected in only 11.3% of H. pylori infections in Thailand. Sequential therapy is highly effective in clarithromycin‐sensitive but is less effective in clarithromycin‐resistant H. pylori. PCR‐molecular test could be a useful tool to identify antimicrobial resistance for optimizing an eradication regimen.     

Effectiveness of minocycline-based triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Widespread use of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori has increased the prevalence of clarithromycin‐resistant strains. The purpose of the present paper was to measure the in vitro antibacterial activity of minocycline against H. pylori, and study the effectiveness of minocycline‐based first‐ and second‐line eradication therapies. Methods: For first‐line therapy, 79 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and minocycline. For second‐line therapy, 88 patients were tested for sensitivity to metronidazole: 67 patients with metronidazole‐sensitive strains received a 7‐day course of rabeprazole, minocycline, and metronidazole; the remaining 21 patients were given a 7‐day course of rabeprazole, minocycline, and faropenem. Results: There was virtually no resistance to minocycline among the strains tested. The eradication rate of H. pylori infection in first‐line therapy was significantly lower for minocycline‐containing regimen (38.5%, 15/39) than for clarithromycin‐containing regimen (82.5%, 33/40; P < 0.01). For second‐line therapy, a high eradication rate against metronidazole‐sensitive strains was obtained with rabeprazole, minocycline and metronidazole (85%, 57/67). Conclusions: A combination of rabeprazole, minocycline, and metronidazole is safe and effective for second‐line therapy of H. pylori infection. Because this regimen can be administered to patients with penicillin allergy and patients who suffer adverse reactions to amoxicillin, such as diarrhea and other digestive symptoms, it should be considered useful for second‐ and third‐line eradication therapy.     

Helicobacter pylori:Management in 2013

Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)is a prevalent,worldwide,chronic infection.Choice of treatment can be modified according to antibiotic-resistance rates of H.pylori.The ideal therapeutic regimen for H.pylori infection should achieve an eradication rate of≥80%.In some countries,triple therapy with a proton-pump inhibitor(PPI),clarithromycin,and amoxicillin or metronidazole is still the best option.Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy consisting of bismuth salts,tetracycline,metronidazole and PPI,may be the preferred option in countries with clarithromycin resistance>20%.Sequential therapy including a PPI and amoxicillin given for the first 5 d,followed by triple therapy including a PPI,clarithromycin,and nitroimidazole antimicrobial(all twice daily)for the remaining 5 d,can be another option for the first-line treatment of H.pylori.Recent data suggest that treatment with PPI,levofloxacin,and amoxicillin for 10 d is a good choice for second-line therapy.Concomitant therapy consisting of PPI,amoxicillin,clarithromycin and metronidazole is another option for second-line treatment.If second-line treatment also fails,it is recommended to culture H.pylori from biopsy specimens and perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing.Rescue treatment should be based on antimicrobial susceptibility.     

Hybrid vs sequential therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan: a prospective randomized trial

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of sequential vs hybrid therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From March 2013 to May 2014,one hundred and seventy-five H. pylori infected patients who had not been treated for H. pylori before wererandomized to receive either sequential therapy(rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 5 d,followed by rabeprazole 20 mg,clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 5 d) or hybrid therapy(rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 7 d,followed by rabeprazole 20 mg,amoxicillin 1 g,clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 d). H. pylori status was confirmed by positive results of both rapid urease test and histology examination or a positive result of culture. Eradication efficacy was assessed by follow-up endoscopy with rapid urease test and histological examination 8 wk after the end of anti-H. pylori therapy,or 13C-urea breath test at least 4 wk after completion of treatment. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication by intension-to-treat(ITT) and per-protocol(PP) analyses.RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients(83 patients in the sequential group and 84 patients in the hybrid group) completed the study. The compliance rates were 97.6% and 97.7% for the two groups,respectively. The eradication rate was 78.2% for the sequential group and 92% for the hybrid group by ITT analysis(P = 0.01). The eradication rate was 81.9% for the sequential group and 96.4% for the hybrid group by PP analysis(P = 0.01). Univariate analysis for the clinical and bacterial factors did not identify any risk factors associated with treatment failure. Severe adverse events were observed in 2.3% of patients in the sequential group and 2.4% of those in the hybrid group.CONCLUSION: Due to a grade A( 95%) success rate for H. pylori eradication by PP analysis,similar compliance and adverse events,hybrid therapy seems to be an appropriate eradication regimen in Taiwan.     

Efficacy of a 1‐week rabeprazole triple therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori and ulcer healing: an ‘in‐clinical‐practice’ study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of a 1‐week treatment regimen consisting of rabeprazole and two antibiotics, clarithromycin and amoxicillin, in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in an ‘in‐clinical‐practice’ setting. METHODS: Patients selected had unequivocal evidence of H. pylori infection based on urease test and histology of antral and corpus biopsies obtained at endoscopy. Patients with complicated ulcers were not included. Patients received rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 1 week and were assessed for successful eradication at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy by repeat gastroscopy and gastric biopsies. Eradication was defined as absence of bacteria in both antral and corpus biopsies tested by histology and urease test. Ulcer patients did not receive continued acid suppression therapy following the 1‐week course of treatment. RESULTS: The study recruited 205 patients of whom 25 were not compliant with the medications or defaulted on follow‐up and were therefore not included in the per‐protocol analysis. Eradication of H. pylori was successful in 166/180 of patients on per‐protocol analysis (92.2% [95% CI: 87.3, 95.7]) and in 169/205 patients on intention‐to‐treat analysis (82.4% [95% CI: 80.5, 90.2]; P = 1.000). There were 47 patients with active ulcers: DU 27, GU 18, DU/GU 2. Overall, ulcer healing was achieved in 42 of 44 (95.5%) patients who had successful eradication of H. pylori infection, but ulcers did not heal in any of the three patients (DU 2, GU 1) who did not eradicate the infection. Of the total group, 199 were assessed for compliance and side‐effects of treatment. Side‐effects were in general mild and tolerable. Of 14 patients who were not compliant with medication, 4 (2.0%) attributed it to side‐effects of treatment (increased abdominal pain, dizziness and taste disturbances) and the remaining 10 did not give specific reasons. The most common side‐effect was bitter taste, reported by 39.2% of patients. Other side‐effects, such as giddiness, increased abdominal pain, lethargy, loose bowel motions and skin rash, were mild and found in only a small percentage of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The rabeprazole 1‐week triple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin is effective in eradicating H. pylori in an ‘in‐clinical‐practice’ setting. The treatment was well tolerated by patients. Good ulcer healing was achieved with short‐course H. pylori eradication therapy without the need for continued acid suppression.     

The Efficacy of Moxifloxacin-Containing Triple Therapy after Standard Triple,Sequential, or Concomitant Therapy Failure for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Korea

Background/Aims

Retreatment after initial treatment failure for Helicobacter pylori is very challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacies of moxifloxacin-containing triple and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy.

Methods

A total of 151 patients, who failed initial H. pylori treatment, were included in this retrospective cohort study. The initial regimens were standard triple, sequential, or concomitant therapy, and the efficacies of the two following second-line treatments were evaluated: 7-day moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1,000 mg twice a day, and moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) and 7-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg twice a day, tetracycline 500 mg 4 times a day, metronidazole 500 mg 3 times a day, and tripotassium dicitrate bismuthate 300 mg 4 times a day).

Results

The overall eradication rates after moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy were 69/110 (62.7%) and 32/41 (78%), respectively. Comparison of the two regimens was performed in the patients who failed standard triple therapy, and the results revealed eradication rates of 14/28 (50%) and 32/41 (78%), respectively (p=0.015). The frequency of noncompliance was not different between the two groups, and there were fewer adverse effects in the moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy group (2.8% vs 7.3%, p=0.204 and 25.7% vs 43.9%, p=0.031, respectively).

Conclusions

Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy, a recommended second-line treatment for initial concomitant or sequential therapy failure, had insufficient efficacy.     

Rabeprazole,clarithromycin, and amoxicillin Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: Report of an efficacy study

AIM:To investigate the efficacy of a standard triple therapy(comprising rabeprazole,clarithromycin,and amoxicillin)for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication,noting factors that influence the outcome and documenting any adverse events.METHODS:Following institutional ethical approval,fifty consecutive and consenting symptomatic patients with evidence of H.pylori infection by either a positive urea breath test(UBT)and/or a campylobacter-like organism test who presented to the Gastroenterology clinic of Lagos State University Teaching Hospital between 2012 and 2013 were recruited into the study.Patients were openly randomized to either a 7-d or a 10-d regimen of amoxicillin 1 g,clarithromycin 500mg and rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily.The extent of symptom resolution was noted following the treatment,and at the end of one month after the completion oftreatment,a repeat UBT was performed in each patient to document the eradication of the infection.All data(demographics,symptoms,and eradication rates)were collated and analyzed with SPSS version 18.RESULTS:Forty-seven patients completed the study(three were excluded from the analysis for breaching the study protocol).The patients included 18 males and 29 females within the age range of 13-80 years(mean 43.7,SD 16.8).The clinical features of the study subjects were dyspepsia,reflux symptoms and features of gastrointestinal bleeding.The average eradication rate was 87.2%.Eighteen subjects were enrolled in the 7-d arm,while 29 were in the 10-d arm.There was no statistically significant difference in the age or sex distributions of the two arms.There was no significant advantage of the 10-d treatment duration over the 7-d duration(P=0.78),and the eradication outcomes were not influenced by the gender or age of the subjects.No adverse effects were reported in either arm.CONCLUSION:The triple therapy regime,employing a combination of amoxicillin,clarithromycin and rabeprazole,showed great efficacy and safety in the eradication of H.pylori,and this outcome was not influenced by gender or age.No difference was observed between the 7-d and 10-d regimens.     

Concomitant therapy achieved the best eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori among various treatment strategies

AIM: To compare the Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori) eradication rate of clarithromycin-based triple therapy,metronidazole-based triple therapy,sequential therapy and concomitant therapy.METHODS: A total of 680 patients infected with H.pylori were divided into 4 groups and each group was treated with a different eradication therapy.Clarithromycin-based triple therapy was applied to the first group [rabeprazole,amoxicillin and clarithromycin(PAC) group: proton pump inhibitor(PPI),amoxicillin,clarithromycin],whereas the second group was treated with metronidazole-based triple therapy [rabeprazole,amoxicillin and metronidazole(PAM) group: PPI,amoxicillin,metronidazole].The third group was treated with rabeprazole and amoxicillin,followed by rabeprazole,clarithromycin and metronidazole(sequential group).The final group was simultaneously treated with rabeprazole,amoxicillin clarithromycin and metronidazole(concomitant therapy group).In the case of a failure to eradicate H.pylori,second-line quadruple and third-line eradication therapies were administered.RESULTS: The per protocol(PP) analysis was performed on 143,139,141 and 143 patients in the PAC,PAM,sequential and concomitant groups,respectively.We excluded patients who did not receive a C13-urea breath test(22,20,23 and 22 patients,respectively) and patients with less than an 80% compliance level(5,11,6 and 5 patients,respectively).The eradication rates were 76.2%(109/143) in the PAC group,84.2%(117/139) in the PAM group,84.4%(119/141) in the sequential group and 94.4%(135/143) in the concomitant group(P = 0.0002).All 14 patients who failed second-line therapy were treated with thirdline eradication therapy.Among these 14 patients,6 infections were successfully eradicated with the thirdline therapy.Both PP and intention-to-treat analysis showed an eradication rate of 42.9%(6/14).In the PAC group,3 of 4 patients were successfully cured(3/4,75%); 2 of 2 patients in the PAM group(2/2,100%) and 1 of 5 patients in the sequential group(1/5,20%) were also cured.In the concomitant group,all 3 patients failed(0/3,0%).CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the concomitant therapy was much higher than those of the standard triple therapy or sequential therapy(Clinical Trials.gov number NCT01922765).     

One Week of Esomeprazole Triple Therapy vs. 1 Week of Omeprazole Triple Therapy Plus 3 Weeks of Omeprazole for Duodenal Ulcer Healding in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis>-Positive Patients

In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, H. pylori-positive patients with an active duodenal ulcer (DU) received esomeprazole, 20 mg twice daily (bid), or omeprazole, 20 mg bid, with amoxicillin, 1000 mg bid, and clarithromycin, 500 mg bid, for 1 week (EAC and OAC, respectively). Patients received an additional 3 weeks of either placebo or omeprazole, 20 mg once daily (od), in the EAC and OAC groups, respectively. The intent-to-treat population included 374 patients (EAC, 186; OAC, 188). Four-week DU healing rates were similar in the EAC+placebo and OAC+omeprazole groups: 74% and 76%, respectively. DU healing rates at 8 weeks were 87% for EAC+placebo and 88% for OAC+omeprazole. H. pylori eradication rates were 75% and 79% for EAC and OAC, respectively. Both regimens were well tolerated. A 1-week regimen of esomeprazole-based H. pylori eradication triple therapy was as effective for DU healing and eradication of H. pylori as omeprazole-based triple therapy followed by an additional 3 weeks of monotherapy.     

Update on clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori in Hong Kong and its effect on clarithromycin-based triple therapy

AIM: To determine the antibiotic susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori and evaluate the efficacy of a clarithromycin-based triple therapy in relation to antibiotic resistance. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for upper endoscopy due to dyspeptic symptoms were recruited. Gastric biopsies were obtained for the CLO test, histology and culture. Antibiotic susceptibility was assessed by the E-test. Patients with H. pylori infection received rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1,000 mg, all twice daily for 7 days. RESULTS: Of 234 patients recruited, 124 were H. pylori-positive and culture was successful in 102 patients. The updated prevalences of resistance to clarithromycin, amoxicillin and metronidazole were 7.8, 0 and 39.2%, respectively. A total of 86 patients received 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1,000 mg, all twice daily, and 81 patients attended the follow-up test. Eradication rates by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis were 92.6 and 87.2%, respectively. The eradication rate by per protocol was significantly higher in patients with clarithromycin-susceptible strains than in those with clarithromycin-resistant strains (98.6 vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin resistance reduces the clinical efficacy of clarithromycin-based triple therapy. However, due to the low prevalence of clarithromycin resistance, clarithromycin-based therapy is still the first choice for clinical use.     

Comparison of the efficacy of triple versus quadruple therapy on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and antibiotic resistance

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication with pantoprazole-based 7-day standard triple therapy (PAC) and 10-day quadruple therapy (PBMT), and to study the primary resistance of H. pylori to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline. METHODS: A total of 170 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and H. pylori infection were allocated to two study groups. The PAC group received pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1.0 g b.i.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 days; the PBMT group received pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d., colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg b.i.d, metronidazole 400 mg t.i.d. and tetracycline 750 mg b.i.d. for 10 days. A total of 80 H. pylori strains were isolated and antibiotic resistance was measured by the agar dilution method. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients completed the therapy. The intention-to-treat eradication rates in the PAC and PBMT groups were 63.5% and 89.4%, respectively (P < 0.05). By per protocol analysis, the eradication rates of the two groups were 65.1% and 91.6%, respectively (P < 0.05). Overall 77 clinical isolated H. pylori strains were cultured successfully. The H. pylori primary resistance rates to metronidazole and clarithromycin were 41.6% and 20.8%, respectively, whereas all the H. pylori isolates were sensitive to amoxicillin and tetracycline. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of PAC declines in many regions in China because of high antibiotic resistance rates. The PBMT regimen achieved a high eradication rate of H. pylori and might be used as a first-line therapy.     

Prospective Trial in Saudi Arabia Comparing the 14-day Standard Triple Therapy with the 10-day Sequential Therapy for Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Background/Aims:

Treatment success for Helicobacter pylori infection in Saudi Arabia is relatively unexplored. This prospective study compared the efficacy of sequential versus standard triple therapy in curing H. pylori infections.

Patients and Methods

Eligible patients underwent upper endoscopy at a single center in Saudi Arabia from October 2011 to February 2014. Patients who tested positive for H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to sequential therapy or standard triple therapy. Sequential treatment: Esomeprazole (20 mg bid for 10 days), amoxicillin (1000 mg for 5 days), then clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg; both bid for 5 days. Standard triple treatment: Esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1000 mg each bid for 14 days. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients were tested for cure using a validated urea breath test. Application of the E-test determined susceptibility of H. pylori to different antibiotics.

Results:

Of the 115 patients who received sequential therapy, 93 completed treatment. In the triple-therapy arm, 103 of 117 patients completed treatment. The eradication rate was 58/93 (62.3%) with sequential therapy and 69/102 (67.6%) with standard triple therapy, P = 0.44. Risk ratio was 0.92 (95% CI; 0.75–1.13), and number needed to treat was 19. Overall primary resistance: Metronidazole (48.5%), clarithromycin (23.3%), amoxicillin (14.8%), levofloxacin (11.1%), and tetracycline (2.3%). Mild adverse events occurred in 35 and 17 patients in the sequential and standard therapy groups, respectively.

Conclusion:

Sequential and standard triple therapies were similarly effective at eradicating H. pylori in two-thirds of Saudi patients. Metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance to H. pylori strains was common.     

Randomized open trial for comparison of proton pump inhibitors in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in relation to CYP2C19 genotype

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 influences the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin. However, in triple therapy (PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin), little is known about the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphism, or the use of rabeprazole, which is not well metabolized by CYP2C19. The efficacy of three PPI (omeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole) in a 1-week triple regimen were compared in relation to CYP2C19 polymorphism. METHOD: One hundred and eighty-three patients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens: amoxicillin 500 mg t.i.d., clarithromycin 200 mg t.i.d., and PPI (omeprazole 20 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, or rabeprazole 10 mg) b.i.d. CYP2C19 polymorphism was analyzed by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat-based overall cure rates for omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole regimens were 83.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 69-89%), 86.7% (CI: 75-93%), and 76.6% (CI: 64-85%), respectively, without significant difference. The cure rate of the rabeprazole regimen (but not the lansoprazole or omeprazole regimens) tended to be correlated with CYP2C19 genotypes (P = 0.076). In patients with a homozygous extensive metabolizer genotype, the per protocol-based cure rate with rabeprazole (62.5%) was significantly lower than that with lansoprazole (90.0%; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The overall cure rate of 1-week triple therapy for H. pylori eradication was not significantly different between regimens with omeprazole, lansoprazole or rabeprazole, but the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the cure rate appeared to differ between these PPI.     

Efficacy of a therapeutic strategy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To determine the efficacy of our therapeutic strategy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and to identify predictive factors for successful eradication.METHODS: From April 2006 to June 2010, we retrospectively assessed 2428 consecutive patients (1025 men, 1403 women; mean age 55 years, age range 18-92 years) with gastric histology positive for H. pylori infection referred to our unit for 13-C urea breath test (UBT), after first-line therapy with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. for 7 d. Patients who were still positive to UBT were recommended a second-line therapy (PPI b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 14 d). Third choice treatment was empirical with PPI b.i.d. + amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. + levofloxacin 250 mg b.i.d. for 14 d.RESULTS: Out of 614 patients, still H. pylori-positive after first-line therapy, only 326 and 19 patients respectively rechecked their H. pylori status by UBT after the suggested second and third-line regimens. “Per protocol” eradication rates for first, second and third-line therapy were 74.7% (95% CI: 72.7%-76.4%), 85.3% (95% CI: 81.1%-89.1%) and 89.5% (95% CI: 74.9%-103%) respectively. The overall percentage of patients with H. pylori eradicated after two treatments was 97.8% (95% CI: 97.1%-98.4%), vs 99.9% (95% CI: 99.8%-100%) after three treatments. The study found that eradication therapy was most effective in patients with ulcer disease (P < 0.05, P = 0.028), especially in those with duodenal ulcer. Smoking habits did not significantly affect the eradication rate.CONCLUSION: First-line therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin produces an H. pylori eradication rate comparable or superior to other studies and second-line treatment can still be triple therapy with amoxicillin and tinidazole.     

Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized study

Background

Antimicrobial resistance has decreased eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori infection worldwide. A sequential treatment schedule has been reported to be effective, but studies published to date were performed in Italy. We undertook this study to determine whether these results could be replicated in India.

Methods

A randomized, open-labeled, prospective controlled trial comparing sequential vs. standard triple-drug therapy was carried out at Lokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai. Two hundred and thirty-one patients with dyspepsia were randomized to a 10-day sequential regimen (40 mg of pantoprazole, 1 g of amoxicillin, each administered twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 40 mg of pantoprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 500 mg of tinidazole, each administered twice daily for the remaining 5 days) or to standard 14-day therapy (40 mg of pantoprazole, 500 mg of clarithromycin, and 1 g of amoxicillin, each administered twice daily).

Results

The eradication rate achieved with the sequential regimen was significantly greater than that obtained with the triple therapy. Per-protocol eradication rate of sequential therapy was 92.4 % (95 % CI 85.8–96.1 %) vs. 81.8 % (95 % CI 73.9–87.8 %) (p?=?0.027) for standard drug therapy. Intention-to-treat eradication rates were 88.2 % (95 % CI 80.9–93.0 %) vs. 79.1 % (95 % CI 71.1–85.4 %), p?=?0.029, respectively. The incidence of major and minor side effects between therapy groups was not significantly different (14.6 % in the triple therapy group vs. 23.5 % in sequential group, p?=?0.12). Follow up was incomplete in 3.3 % and 4.7 % patients in standard and sequential therapy groups, respectively. Sequential therapy includes one additional antibiotic (tinidazole) that is not contained in standard therapy.

Conclusions

Sequential therapy was significantly better than standard therapy for eradicating H. pylori infection.